#mrroyals.
stone gust
Can you send me the ID of an intent that this happened for? I think this may be something I have to direct you to our support to handle more closely but am happy to take a look first
candid bane
can i send something from test mode or does it have to be from production
stone gust
If you have an example of this in test mode I can definitely look at it
candid bane
seti_1NsrYKIACAYMzG11AjSzeLLB
{
"payment_method_data": {
"us_bank_account": {
"account_holder_type": "company",
"account_number": "********6789",
"routing_number": "110000000",
"account_type": "checking"
},
"billing_details": {
"name": "Testing Test"
},
"type": "us_bank_account"
},
"customer": "cus_OdFVRx7aesjA2V",
"payment_method_options": {
"us_bank_account": {
"verification_method": "microdeposits"
}
},
"payment_method_types": {
"0": "us_bank_account"
}
}```when i go to the verify page, i see this
stone gust
Thanks for the ID, checking it out. And where are you seeing "SA-XXXX"?
candid bane
sorry i meant SM-XXXXX
i want to be consistent and use only microdeposit values over 0.01 DESCRIPTOR CODE VALUES
stone gust
Gotcha, thanks for the clarification. Still looking in to this and will get back with what I can find
candid bane
ok thanks
stone gust
Hey @candid bane thanks for your patience. Unfortunately it is not possible to force this one way or the other at the moment. We initially try to use the descriptor code format ("SMXXX") and if the bank does not support it, we fall back to the two amount method
candid bane
when the descriptor code is sent, will the value sent always be 0.01?
stone gust
The amounts will change. The consistent .01 is just a test mode thing
summer saffronBOT