#GeorgeManderson

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

little rainBOT
rough badge
#

technically it doesn't need to be one, and I could just parse their charge objects but Id rather just do one call and not have to parse at all.

regal geyser
rough badge
#

Thanks, I'll take a look.

#

Looks like I can't search dispute objects directly, I can at least refine the charge object query to only include charges that are disputed. Thanks for the help.

regal geyser
#

Yes, unfortunately it looks like there isn't a way to do this with the disputes API directly so this should be the best way to get this info. I think with the search API you can still expand the dispute field on the charge object, so you may only need to make one API call here

rough badge
#

The documentation only shows a disputed field which is a Boolean. No expandable dispute field, is this an error in the documentation?

regal geyser
#

Apologis, that might have just been me making an assumption. Checking in to that

#

Yeah you are right, I think you might actually have to request each of those disputes individually after getting them with that list call.

rough badge
#

Ok that's what I planned to do if there wasn't a simpler way, thank you for your help.