MarcusStripe

[forest jolt]

👋 happy to help

actually you wouldn't be able to go that far

you have a limit of 4 expansion levels

so the best you can do is "data.items.data.price"

[craggy folio]

data.items.data.price woah confusing

is there any way to understand this whole confusing syntax?

I mean how could i come up with this myself???

so I guess instead of doing the expand, I could just retrieve the id of the price and then retrieve the priece object, expanded

[distant lava]

Hello 👋
Stepping in as tarzan needs to step away

As my colleague mentioned, expand has a limit of 4 levels

I mean how could i come up with this myself???
You'd expand one level at a time to figure out what you want here

so I guess instead of doing the expand, I could just retrieve the id of the price and then retrieve the priece object, expanded
You could if you have the ID already

[craggy folio]

Price stripePrice = subscriptionItem.getPrice();

this returns the price object... how can I JUST retrive the price id instead?

because I woudl then just for the Id retrieve both price and product at once, instead

[distant lava]

The API won't return just the ID, it returns the whole object
So you might want something like subscriptionItem.getPrice().id (given getPrice() function works as expected)

[craggy folio]

even without the expand?

or do I need the expand, so that at a minimum I get the entire price object?

[distant lava]

It'd be easier to test it out to be honest.
Can you print out what subscriptionItem.getPrice() this gets you and share the object?

[craggy folio]

easier for you for sure.

not so easy here. working on it, anyway