#Horus heresy 3.0 rule book leak
1 messages · Page 3 of 1
DA/NL
IF/IW
UM/WB
BA/EC
IH/DG
SW/TS
WS/AL
SAL/SH
idk the list started strong and felt more wrong at the end lol
just finished reading the flyer rule
this is good
flyers are only in during your turn, you get to assign a mission, and a flyer with specific mission can only act in a certain way before being removed and go back to aerial reserve during your shooting phase
the only way to damage an enemy flyer is using reaction
but flyers get harder and harder to come back, the first time they come in on 3+, second time 4+, etc. till a max of 6+
What missions are there?
Bus in, bus out, shoot and scoot, all out attack
The most 'offensive' of the missions, strafing run, can be intercepted at full BS, but it's the only one like that (We can also presume skyfire allows full BS interceptions against them all)
Even at snap shots things like autocannons are going to duff up flyers with rate of fire and the new BS table.
Yep, but interception is called while the flyer is at the board edge, not its destination
So may be interesting to see how it shakes out
Having played with a similar format in LI I’m genuinely stoked for it. It works very well there and I don’t see why it wouldn’t here.
Range limits on any intercepting weapons aside, it may encourage clever 'approach vectors' to avoid LoS of AA batteries
I can imagine Ravenwing specific detachments boosting this ability to come back next turn for flyers
Flyers are potent, but true AAA scares the crap out of it and you get into some real thematic push-pull of ground forces trying to knock out air cover for your wing to come zooming in.
They also feel like planes, not weirdly hovering amalgamations of guns with a right angle fetish.
From a core rules perspective? Quite possibly. From a datasheet / special rule perspective? We’ll need more info.
They've been good over the years at various times. We're just due it again
it reminds me of the old forge world flyer rules, where the flyer itself isn't really on the table much at all
when GW started making plastic flyers they ruined the rules so that they would actually have to stay on the table and they've never managed to figure that out
the old FW rules did have a provision for hovering, where the flyer would then behave like a skimmer, used for things like Valkyries
I think hover rule would still be there
I'm liking the flyer rules. Reminds me of the flyer rules for dropzone commander, which I loved. The intercept reaction is going to create some cinematic moments
The extraction mission is written weirdly. Like how it's written it doesn't allow the unit that wants to get on board to make a move before being in the required 2" distance from the flyer.
how so? I think it's quite clear
Huge base plus planning from the player will do the trick
You set the mission and place the flyer during reserve phase, move full movement during movement phase, resolve combat air patrol and or intercept, then unit within 2 inch of the flyer model can embark, shoot defensive weapon, then gtfo
That’s my interpretation
Good luck getting a unit lined up to be wholly with 2" of the base before you even move the flyer in a straight line
Does it have to be wholly within 2"?
Yup
You place the flyer on your table edge, the enemy now can make Intercept, then you move, then Combat Patrol, then the unit can embark if in 2 " and after that the flyer fucks off again.
Like, I guess it works if the unit is allowed to make a move after the final position of the plane is clear, but that's technically not in the rules
I wonder if hover flyers still exist
Hmm where did it say unit cannot move beforehand?
I wonder what Dreadclaw and Karhyptis will be
It just says the flyer moves in the movement phase, so I don't see you being unable to just activate the passenger unit to move first
Again. Good luck positioning a unit to be completely with range of a flyer base when the flyer isn't allowed any manoeuvre
"In the Movement Phase, a Model with an Extraction Mission can be selected and must then move up to a number of inches equal to its Movement Characteristic straight forwards without turning. At this point a Combat Air Patrol can be declared by the Reactive Player. Once any Combat Air Patrol Reactions have been resolved, an eligible Unit that has all of its Models within 2" may Embark upon the Model performing the Extraction Mission, even if that Unit has a Tactical Status that would prevent it from being able to Embark. Note that the Model assigned the Extraction Mission uses the edge of its flying base as an Access Point."
I never said I disagreed, just that at least the extraction unit CAN move.
Maybe the flyer is allowed to push models aside. That would also work
it uh, didn't say you have to complete the embarking in a single move, I think
you can move the flyer, then move the unit to within 2 inch of the flyer
That's not what the rule says
Move flyer
Resolve CAP
If unit in range, embark
It says Embark, there has to be a clear definition of Embark in the previous section
I'm inclined that Embark is a general action perform by unit during movement phase
You place it, it triggers, you move
I have no issue regarding flyer zooming in straight line
I think the key is whether I can do: Move unit A, move Vehicle A, then Embark unit A into Vehicle A
Or does Unit A have to move -> embark, before going to the next unit
The difficulty will be this:
- The flyer is placed on the edge of the board.
- Interceptions
- You can choose to move the extraction unit first in the movement phase to get them in a position where they will all be wholly within 2" of the final position of the flyer by the time it activates again and flies over
That will be tough for larger units, which is an interesting dynamic
yeah, personally I don't think it's going to be a big issue, but would be a bit weird if I had to land the flyer exactly within a 2" circle of the embarking unit
That's how it is, RAW. But at least you can move the extraction unit first to prep them
Hold on. Grabbing my Totally-Not-A-Nephilim Xiphon and feeling this out
regardless the gtfo happens at the end of shooting phase
Sure, but that has no impact on the embarking stuff
(I really am excited to see this system in action)
There was some hints that vehicles can move through units, right? So if you can plunge the flyer straight into the place the unit is in and the models just get pushed aside, it would work
This is what I'm hoping for
Because once I saw in the Death and Glory reaction that vehicles can push through, I was intrigued
Also, for reference
This is how tight a squeeze 'wholly within 2 inches' is:
where did I miss this??
It's presumably just an edit of the template
Lmao
You got got
It happens
(Though I guess delete it to avoid it confusing people)
nothing ever happens
That’s crazy. You basically have to create a donut and land the flyer in the center hole
And for my next trick....
agreed I was discussing my dislike for flyers in the table top because the rules never felt good and didnt make sense. This set of rules makes way more sense and it feels like CAS
they dont have time to load up 20 dudes, hot drop scoop and swoop
The „wholly within“ for extraction also means you cant pick up models on bases over 50mm right?
Sure, and I like that, but 2" is a VERY tight fit
Tight enough that it kinda takes me out of it a bit. See my photo etc
Like I said. huge base of the flyer helps.
RAW yeah, but I'd allow it (within reason)
Of course just raw. In the legions lists there is nothing over 50mm thats not a dread anyways is it?
Can't remember
It's not legion lists I'm worried about for that rule anyway!
the thing with the new flyer rules that im worried about is the "becomes harder and harder to bring them in from reserves" thing
so realistically you get what, 2/3 uses of them per game? feels kinda low given most of the modes that let you fire weapons only have you snapshoot
so it will be a real balancing act between their damage output/cost
Well in 2ed you get to bring them once and then they die
is it going to be very different here?
Absolutely
interceptor still exists, and snap shots are stronger than ever
Getting hit on 5+ instead of 3+ is a huge difference
Units can only react once per turn so will the enemy shooty unit intercept the flyer or save the reaction for the shooting phase?
Tbf, skyfire will possibly intercept flyers at full BS
Absolutely
sure, but thats still killing a unit
Another element though, is that intercept happens at your board edge, rather than their destination
and its not like flyers are (probably) any tougher in real terms
So it may mean some AA can't get a good shot, or range
They are not braindead great but better than in 2ed
that might be a saving grace
smart positioning to deny any actual interceptor reactions
Also, flyers only having a single AV may be interesting for survivability
We didn't saw night fighting rules so far but that could possibly also be a factor
could be, but im guessing its going to be like 10 or 11
That change slipped by a lot of people
on a xiphon at least
Yeah we'll see
fire raptor/storm eagle are probably AV12
Tbh a good table will allow that. No unit should be able to see the whole table from their starting position
another thing though is that GETTING points for flyers will be hard. Because if you just have a lot of AA saturation the enemy can decide to just have the flyer leave, so I could see some potential points denial shenanigans with them depending on what the missions are like
less a unit and more like orbital bombardment (the old chapter master rule) you use like once a battle
Kill point missions are not worth the paper they are printed on. Such a lousy concept
still, the points costs will be crucial, I dont think expensive flyers will work, or that flyer durability will be very premium (because despite my worry about interceptor, thats still realistically just one shooting attack per turn, they dont need to weather repeated/concentrated firepower)
I expect that the new core mission will be the mission we see in the new rulebook.
yes, I would assume so
although I wonder how different they will be, I think theres two options: its just the old ones reskinned or its going to go all in on the new characteristics and have lots of int checks and stuff
Not unless units came printed with something that compensates for how much harder it is to kill 10 firedrakes than 10 militia, anyway.
like Power Rating
Uh interesting. Maybe we will need intelligence for objectives and such. Could be a thing, yes
oh god 10 firedrakes....
I think they outright mentioned it in the explanation of the new stats
Where the mental fortitude of a warrior was previously represented by Leadership alone, there are now four Advanced Characteristics for each unit. These are Leadership, Willpower, Intelligence, and Cool – which oldheads will remember from the Rogue Trader era of Warhammer 40,000, and which add more nuance between units for a variety of in-game tests.
A Legion Psyker might have very high Willpower, while a tech-adept or communications specialist will have high Intelligence. Here’s how that looks on a Legionary:
Its not outright confirmed, but im trying to think of what other tests you would need "comms specialists" for
Reserves manipulation
We saw in the stream a little piece from the campaign thingy. One of the actions was an intelligence check to reduce the cost of reactions
Oh thats cool
I wonder if theres one that makes your aircraft come in more reliably
I would assume so, and probably intelligence tests used for stuff like vox disruptors too
heresy definetly has more opportunities to use intelligence than say MESBG, where the stat was implemented for borderline no reason
Now?
Yep, some cut, some rolled into another rule. Like Impact (A) replaces Rage, Impact (S) replaces furious charge etc
wheres that?
Someone else will need to post the imgur link, can't dig it up atm.
It's just the person posting more stuff on 4chan again
Missions and the full special rule list
is twin linked gone?
Yep, and mastercrafted
almost all rerolls are gone now i think
Can't say it's too much until we see what weapons have it. They could be quite weak without it
Reaping Blow got a minor buff by my reading? The fact that bulky(X) now counts as additional units. Does that mean that someone with a scythe can do a reaping blow if toe to toe with a leviathan, etc.?
Anyone have a link?
An imgur link was posted in the actual 3.0 rules channel, if you scroll up. you'll find it! (Unhelpful, I know)
Not just that, but it uses the total of enemies in the combat now, not just base contact
That's not how I read it. The weapon will grant Reaping Blow(X) and the X=the number of bonus attacks.
So I assume most scythes will be Reaping Blow (1) but morty will get like Reaping Blow (3) or something.
You misunderstand me, it compares your unit and their unit
To decide whether you're outnumbered
Ohhh, right right, I did misunderstand you. Thanks for that clarification.
Scythe users rejoice!
Wait.
WAIT.
(I shouldn't be surprised you're a DG player, in hindsight)
Mortarion's bulky letting him just solo small squads is VERY funny
Small squads of deathshroud running about will be even funnier.
Especially if he keeps his 'nothing personnel, kid' teleport
we have an actual 3.0 rules channel?
Always have. It even has been going on longer than this one, and is where most of the stuff gets posted first.
I must be blind or do i need to go add it?
No clue! It's just there for me, above The Observatory category
Isn't that just this thread we are already in?
Nope
The other thread moves too fast to keep up, so I check in here to see if there's been any leaks before wading through that one.
For anyone doing the same: tonight anon posted the pages for the special rules and the core missions.
It seems it's designed for small squads to use em.
Any new leaks/links?
I found it! t's not enabled by default.
Choose Channels & Roles at the top left, then click on the Browse Channels tab. From there you can click the checkbox for it.
Thank you so much!
Woah big buff to battlesmith with it potentially being able to repair multiple hull points/statuses
Hope the HQ techmarines get battlesmiths higher than 1
OMG multiple blast template attacks were fixed. It's not annoying anymore😍
Outflank was fixed yippee
They fixed rad phage holy shit. I didn't think it was possible
Phage looks quite scary now
You still have to scatter multiple times for multiple indirect blasts, but yeah it seems a lot faster
The vanguard rule looks fun. I can see destroyers having the no scoring objectives rule but having a high vanguard number
Hope my arquitors are good finally. Ordnance rule seems good
Quickly running through the mission pack, I'm to assume this means no more Night Fighting?
I hope theres some form of it in the actual nightlords rules or something
The way I see it, I've always been kinda weirded out by night fighting (rules) being a thing in the 40k setting at all. Even for mortal armies (except the most decrepit cult armies, maybe), night vision equipment would be trivial at the scale of abstraction the game has, and with so many superhumans running around.
So I think the fear factor of the NL shouldn't actually factor into whether it's actually dark outside, yknow? It also means they can write NL rules to exist in their own terms and not have to factor in night fighting impacting it
That, and it's crazy how much impact darkness has had on shooting and morale, for a scifi setting with post-humans and demigods, across so many editions.
To me night fighting was a stand in for bad vision environments like electricity storms, huge smoke and ash clouds, green poisoning mist and so forth and not just darkness
Well yeah, that's the only stuff we'd actually use it for in games we played. Especially ZM, weird cityfights etc.
But night fighting as a standard mechanic, yknow?
Felt out of place (to me)
Is it confirmed that there’s no more bonus attack for charging or having 2x CCWs? Also have the rules for weapons (like assault, bolt, etc) leaked yet?
Former, not confirmed. More that there's no sign of them at all, so the absence is the 'proof' so far. Even disordered charge rules don't mention a normal charge bonus, just 'rules that give a bonus on the charge.'
Latter, nah, but those weapon type indicators are almost certainly just keywords
+1 to whatever for Bolt Weapons as fists etc
Assault is different, we've only seen it on the bolt pistol profile, and is what indicates that a weapon can volley fire. So isn't related to the old assault weapons rule, since we know meltaguns don't have it, thankfully
I just see night fighting as something essential to help ensure that shooting armies aren't stupidly good
So seeing that and the changes to melee make me concerned about how melee is gonna look this edition
I mostly play all of my armies as melee-centric, so I get it
It's actually my main concern I've got, but I'll need to see how it goes.
It's just that THEMATICALLY the NF rule was odd to me
i thought this as well first
but then i realized every mission is about scoring objectives in the midfield
so i think melee is going to see a huge boost just because their gameplan is already running up the board
Yeah, we don't have the complete picture yet. Hopefully it won't be that bad. But who knows
we do have a semi complelte picture of all the missions
and all the missions say that moving up the board is key
cant wait for all people that scrambled to by multimeltas because its the new hot thing to realise they might not to be able to score a single point with them at all due to Support Squad rule
Had a read of the missions and they "say" the middle of the board but uhhh, two of the missions only say that objectives should be at least 12" away from the board edge. And another says at least 6" away
Which... doesn't seem like a good sign tbh
the key is that objectives are set before the deployment map is chosen
so actually trying to deploy them to anyones advantage is near impossible
Ahh good point
and even if you choose the corner to deploy objectives that is always in a deployment zone
you might just lose the rolloff and then the opponent chooses that spot
and then you are super fucked against melee
there are new leaks flying around
what leaks?
most of the special rules and complete core mission pack
that is old news
With TSS and HSS presumably now being in the same detachment fighting for slots, I wonder how they're going to balance that. The HSS is now way more mobile and brings more fire power in a single slot.
So both advantages of the TSS, mobility and availability, seem to be gone?
TSS is now vets I believe
from what they showed so far vets are BS5 and able to take special weapons with a heavy upgrade 1/5
the answer is points and special rules
Please just make HSS unable to score
They deserve punishment for their 2nd Ed crimes
Tactical Support Squads have Line, and/or HSS may have negaLine
YES! I CAN MAKE ARMIES OF ONLY SUPPORT ALL FLAMERS LETSGOOOOO
Hmmm
Can you build a space marine army with only one space marine is my new thought process
Spam tarantulas and the new turret, all led by one centurion
"You can't make your own legion company"
"The hell I can't!" -Some Random techmarine
brethren of iron and tarantula spam
Don't tempt me to do it for some individual blackshields iron warrior lol
huh, I'm trying to figure out how a high-Line character could end up in a support unit
I guess some HQs have a Line value?
That would make sense.
So you're disincentivizing sticking a Line 5 Herald, let's say, into a melta squad
but you'd still score as if Line 2, which is more than they'd get otherwise, so it's not totally negated
but you can negate scoring in so many different ways
apply one of 4 statuses to them, charge them from within the set-up move (which negates Overwatch reaction)
It doesn't say Wholly Within. Just within.
Anything new since this morning?
Outside the special rules and missions leak, nothing else
I just noticed that the missions are 4 turns only.
I truly hated that
It's one of the reasons that the siege of cthonia missions are bad.
What is it with GW putting awful missions in the core 30k rulebook? My group usually ends up homebrewing missions
Oops. "That has all of its models within 2", Is what I must have seen to plant wholly in my mind
Still very punishing
is there another link to the rules leaks?
It's not a huge range for sure but within is much more forgiving that WW.
hopefully it is FAQ'D to become "at the end of the movement phase, one units withing 2" may embark"
It has to be
because it's not applicable for Stormbird - neither it has a base nor it's limited to carry one unit only
or maybe Stormbird will have asignments on its own?
we havent seen super heavy rules yet, so who knows
It seems you can now shoot and charge is that correct at least from what I’m reading in the charge rules?
I don't think we've seen the page that includes the "pick a unit to charge with" step so it's hard to say
I just figured since in the choose enemy target step it doesn’t mention shooting and assaults purpose seems to be different
do we know what detachment slot the new tarantulas are in ?
Probably support with everything else lmao.
DG screwed even more then :D really hope some legion specific stuff will sort it out ^^
what, DG screwed by focusing on bread-and-butter units like they're known for?
by the need for too many consuls, we'll find out soon either way
with the amount of consuls available to astartes i am sure something will be useful
Fast attack they are now. But since that is out of the window... donno
have we seen a fortification detachment?
Yeah I'm also worried about DG and support slots.
I think having a bunch of generic-ass consuls isn't the worst of fates
but I get the idea. maybe legion stuff will take the pressure off.
nothing wrong with the consul modeling side of it, it's just points taken to get them and the faff of the new org chart,
Weird question but with the new flyer rules do you even need the models anymore? Everything being they come on and off in the same turn... Couldn't you just roll the dice and leave the model at home? 😅😅
Cant wait to be constantly putting on and taking off 3 xiphons in my alpha army lol
You need to have the model to measure LoS and embark distance from
Yeah why play with models in the first place? Just take so empty bases with paper printed cut outs
It's just gonna be such a pain to constantly move a resin thunderhawk on and off the table. Genuinely easier to just slap the base down 😅
you can if you want
there's nothing wrong about a cardboard deff dred, in my book
but it does emphasize the point that the models are ultimately just abstract tokens that we have chosen to fancy up
Get stronger. 😎
That doesn't work on resin... It can't go gym. If it falls it's shattering into a million pieces regardless of how many bicep curls your do 😂
That's not the angle I'm approaching it at. I just mean it feels like they're going to spend most of the game off the table which is sad.
Build a real one
On the side board for cool photos.
Serious answer: hopefully the changes make flyers so resilient that they actually spent more time on the table than before
Related: do reserves still start at the second turn or can flyers come onto the board in the first turn.
Would maybe be nice with 4 turn games
needed for both the movement, line of sight and for embarkation
I think Necromunda already has a bunch of characters like that
They show up first turn
Not if it gets shot down. A Thunderhawk is a wonderful terrain piece.
So, I've had a look through what we've seen so far. Any idea how flamers (assuming they have Assault) work regarding Volley Fire in assault? Can they snap fire?
it took them an entire page to explain how to place the template, volley fire with templates is probably another page or two
There is no info regarding any special condotions during snap fore so I guess you use template as normal
We can just be glad, if they CAN volley, that it can't cause panic hah
But templates are nerfed in other way
You no longer can fire if friendly model (even from the same unit) is under the template
So letting them fire as normal on snap shots seems like evening the odds
And this is very interesting: template weapons can have higher RF
In such case you multiply each hit by RF value
Wait actually, I'd have sworn that snapfiring or volley fire didn't cause Tactical Statuses, but now I can't find it. Hopefully I didn't misremember
I though so too
I had thought this was already true.
Found it. Last line of the second last paragraph of volley fire. Panic over.
Never could
What I think is a shame is that they again didn't include a side picture which shows how the templates need to be applied. RAW we have to physical touch the base of the shooter with the tip of the template which creates all sorts of questionable situations and problems. Like shooting it over a small wall when the model stands directly in front of it.
Yeah, obviously it's all wait and see. Just sat here with half an army of Salamanders clutching my pearls over whether they're gonna kick or suck ass.
I mean, hopeful as they the edition poster boys
Sounds like the wordy descriptions are doing their job, heheh
We're all just waiting to find out what our legions are going to do to ass in the new edition
Hopefully that’s not too far away
I can’t really be annoyed with GW if somethings off balance this Ed. They’ve changed around so much stuff that they have no chance at guessing what’s good.
Never having to balance your game because you rewrite it every 3 years is big brain stuff
Your guys suck? Doesn't matter, you'll get to spin the balance wheel again before you're done painting them
I’m pretty much going in to this edition assuming that stuff is gonna be bonked and broken bc there’s things they didn’t forecast or consider when basically rewriting 50% of the game from the ground up
Counter point, many of the changes were either taken from older editions and are know quantities, favorite rules of the head of the specialist team, or taken from one of currently managed and balanced specialist games. There is a decent chance that this edition might be one of the more balanced releases from GW in a long time.
Problem is the law of unintended consequences: when you start mixing in rules from old editions or different games with a current core rules set there’s going to be unforeseen interactions or combos that weren’t accounted for regardless of designer intentions or how balanced those other rules are in their own native systems
Very true
There is, I’m just more forgiving of any mess ups. The dreadnought changes and the addition of reactions should have been readable by GW
Ok, if nobody has the guts to say I have again to step in: It's sunday afternoon. Why is the lazy bastard not online and post new pictures of the ruleset?😉
we have gotten the entire book
Everything you havent seen has just been cut
We got?
Leakers and just taking pictures of the rules in order the first time challenge, difficultly: impossible
Apparently
Also using the scan button to get a smoother picture of the rules
Could depend on where the leaker is from. Here in the states its Sunday morning and Father's Day, so if the leaker is from the US that could explain it.
He is from the us
but the rulebook is in english
clearly proving he is located in England
to be fair he was taking requests
So basically drunk the whole day. Or do y'all celebrate fathers day differently?
Depends on the father, but drinking is usually involved lol
not a dad but I'll have a drink to celebrate them lol
Generally father's day here is "let's go visit grandad, go home then order a Chinese"
Funny enough since I became a father I never had time to do anything on fathers day😅
When do you think 3ed will be on preorder?
5.7.
When I'm a mom I totally intend to make mother's day "we are doing what I want" day lol
Tbf it'll be two mothers days in one day
Literally
Father's day for me was throwing my child in a paddling pool, going to a park, then taxing adopted granny into child care so I could gossip about new Heresy rules 😅
I am getting some alone time in the garage with my airbrush. 👌
Latest rumors suggest August 2nd release, so July 18 or 19 for pre-order possibly
Oh my
Where are the newest leaks at? Anything this weekend
Good question, any more leaks?
my basement has a burst pipe if that is what you are looking for
i will only let you in if you are a plumber though
WHERE ARE MY LEAKS!
at bpdonald10's place, obviously
in the produce section
It would be great to know whether the WS hit chart has changed
yea that's gonna be a big make or break for me
That was literally the first thing that was leaked, "WS chart is 2.0s"
Didn't one of the confirmed leaker said it didn't change ?
but we never got proof
Refusing to believe it unless I get a pic
Fair enough. I've only seen the leaked images, it wasn't in there.
From #hh3-rules-discussion message
Some of those are wrong based on the actual images, but I doubt it would be easy to misinterpret the hit chart
It's important to note that the person who said it, was the same person who actually posted the pictures from the books. He described some stuff via text, then switches to images
Yeah, not saying they're lying, just that they obviously skim read some rules incorrectly. That would be harder to do with a chart of simple numbers, so I'm assuming that's correct.
I hope it's at least a bit different from 2.0, personally, and he missed it
I hope it is the same chart.
I dunno, as someone who had decent access to WS5 I felt bad for WS4 units trying to fight WS5
it was a big contributor to how world eaters felt overall
pushed rampagers even harder for most people, which worsened the perception of falax blades because lmao who isn't taking falax blades on them
Just shoot those MF
"Parry this nerd"
Thats what i do, nothing i really can bring will deal with my friends SoH Reavers, so guns and various warcrimes it is
just drop a bajillion iron circle and artillery
WS4 Iron Cirlce make me incredibly sad and i hope 3.0 buffs them up a bit
If they get their 'buffed if taken with Perturabo' rule still, it's already looking more positive, since they won't count towards the 25% anymore
Rather than being locked to 3500pt games or whatever it was!
Didn't you need to take like 3 of them also if you wanted them attached to Perty?
You could attach any number to him, but you needed 3+ to get the pert-buff. Which is wild
Them presumably being retinue, so no longer part of the 25% in the new Force Org is cool, at least. If it works roughly similar, they should be easier to take
Its fun to throw them on the table, but as a retinue they have to be the worst in the game
WS4 and no Chosen Warriors
Ya that's it
You can also presumably take the Tormentor now in a real game
If they're still WS4 that's a bummer, but WS5 automata are a tough sell imo.
The 25% rule changes at least makes them more... Accessable
That'd be very cool
The thing that would make them most accessible is if Mechanicum get plastic Domitar so we can Kitbash them lol
Mechanicum mindset.
Any word if this guy is gonna keep leaking?
said thursday he was busy with work and was gonna leak over the weekend. then big leak friday night of Special rules and missions. then nothing heard since. so assuming busy
There's some stuff left that he could still leak, but 90% of rules of interest have been posted, so it's down to just pages that might clarify other things we've seen.
It's otherwise just waiting for libers at this point 😬
So they send a british pinkerton deathsquad?
Just a psycho in a bird costume
Terror confirmed to disown Ursurax and and the arlatax
I’m still trying to wrap my head around why they are changing what models can receive wounds. I loved the fact that the only models that could be engaged and receive wounds had to be in LOS and within range.
Because sweeps are gone
wait are we going back to "whole squad dies because one guy's elbow can be seen around the corner"
We don't have shooting phase rules yet, so TBD
Fight phase allows for models not in engagement (in a unit that is in a combat) to have wounds allocated to them
I kinda hope that shooting casualties are limited to visible models only, but when it comes to melee it makes sense to me that the entire unit would get involved
Oh well that helps knights and other big single unit models so that's nice
Truth be told that’s how it used to be in 40k. IIRC that’s how it was in 5th and before. 7th changed a lot with regard to shooting and melee wound allocation, not necessarily for the better
I personally am happy you can put wounds on mooks in the back
4th and I think 3rd worked like 2.0 I believe
it was just 5th that had you picking from any model
6th and 7th (and by extension 1.0) had you starting from the closest model in LOS
the 5th edition version is the laziest and my least favorite
lol it's hilarious that they give this reasoning this but then completely ruin all LOS abstraction
Basically yes
One of the reasons you ever ever ever see forest terrain anymore
the other being that GW hasnt sold kits for it in ages
Personally I like both methods. They each have pros and cons
Though 4th and before did have a lot in common with fantasy terrain rules at the time, and I’m a huge fan of fantasy terrain ru
TLOS mixed with 5th's casualty removal rules is basically the worst possible combination
since you could theoretically just wipe a whole unit shooting at one model through a tiny gap in a window
it's just dumb
at least the other casualty removal methods keep it somewhat under control
regarding things for 3.0 we still haven't seen, I really want to see the rest of the vehicle rules
I have a suspiscion that the different movement modes are gone, but I will be quite upset if things like firing arcs are gone as well
Well, I got on that train of thought because the template rules say something like "place anywhere on the firing vehicle's hull" but I guess the flyers section also specifically calls out centerline mounts
yeah I guess that's not something to worry about
3e has a similar designers' note for removing casualties in melee
sure, but it's melee so it's kind of whatever
Probably so people can't do the "well i made it so only one of my models is engagement range and you killed him so all the other wounds just magically disappear.
I'd imagine they'd keep shooting wounds only being able to be allocated to LoS of the shooting unit. That made sense and worked fine.
I guess technically you'd need at least 1 other in coherency but yeah that is kind of silly
the lack of sweeping advance might make it less of a big not losing attacks
Most people I've played games with play it how 3.0 wrote it. "Fuck it, everyone is in it. Pull whoever."
I really like the new post combat step
yes, the Sigismund mini came up with a 10 pages guide on how to abuse this exact thing to not have him locked in challenges
by not being in engagement range and only piling in later
as someone not totally ingrained in the close combat process (originally a Tau player lol...), the new system does sound cool
the whole ruling was a ripe field for abusing
i did the same thing against dreads all the time, by stretching destroyers into a line so contemptor couldnt kill more than two
and im not ashamed of it, but the way it works needed to go and thankfully it did
God that sounds miserable lmao. We always just full sent it
Waterboarded with tea.
Wait people were actually abusing pile in mechanics to game combat?
That's actually rancid
Yes. I played an alpha legion player who tried this.
I killed a bunch of his dudes at I5 and he removed his models in a way to create a gap where no more models were in b2b or in engagement range. He then was like, „welp combat over and since I’m no longer in b2b or engagement combat ends and I get away.“ to which i corrected him that since he didn’t have any I5 it went to I4 next and even if he didn’t want to move his I4 for pile in, I had I4s close enough (within 3“) to get back in to b2b. He huffed and puffed and complained bc he was banking on using that casualty removal gambit to end combat and shoot me next turn and score the objective. It bit him in the rear 🤣
Yeah it’s funny when you remind people you pile in at each initiative step
My gaming group had one person try to argue that process. My group collectively went "nah fuck that". I don't think that person came back lol
It’s already been solved in the new ed thankfully, you have to pile in
Which is the solution they had before as well
New Saturnine plasma has Barrage. I hate that.
Feels totally arbitrary. "We made a tough platform for this heavy weapon they can move and still shoot - oh also they can just shoot it out of LOS lol"
I was well interested in having 3 double plasma dudes in my backline but not if they're friggin artillery mopes.
"Tactical rapier dreadnought terminators"
Don't quite follow you.
I just don't get why they need to be able to shoot out of LOS. Feels like an unnecessary way just to push the models.
i may have missed where this was confirmed, but if it is: lmao. saturnine gotta have everything
In the article on the new kit
I think it's just meant to be a neat gimmick
oh yeah i just glanced over that section
This is pretty subjective but to ME that gun looks like it shoots a big weighty projectile. That's a Demoman main weapon slot.
... hey wait a second
Out of LOS shooting is pretty damn strong for a gimmick. Especially when it can be AP2 (or breaching).
I was just looking forward to using them but didn't want them to be too strong/unfun to play against. I did plan on taking all plasma cause I just love plasma cannons in my backline shooting over the heads of my despoilers.
You can trade the plasma bombard with a twin heavy disintegrator if you prefer, while swap the disruption fist can become a second plasma bombard or twin heavy disintegrator.
then why are there six fists, if "swap the baseline plasma for a fist" isn't an option
Got plasma HSS, Jetbikes, Deredeos, Contemptors, TSS. I'm just a plasma fanatic
Well we don't know any of the other factors
Idk just feels early to assume it's gonna be busted, PLENTY of hype new models come with kinda dinky rules.
Good question. How many Saturnine were in the big box again?
6, but the "six fists" is per kit of 3
You get six of each weapon so you can dual wield the same guns on a kit of 3, except the fist that... just has another set you can't use
That's totally fair, I am jumping the gun a bit. It's just the trauma of nonLOS shooting with good AP always wrecking the meta of every GW game in the past.
Likely an option for fist and one for fist with attached doohickey per guy
That's also fair.
Ah maybe you can choose which side is the fist, left or right.
I'm assuming choosing side is the reason
just odd to include double fist in the kit and not allow it, given the general GW trajectory
Between the six models in the Saturnine boxed set, you get six plasma bombards, six twin heavy disintegrators, and six disruption fists, each with optional particle shredders.
oh whoops i can read
well thats significantly more of a problem for their eventual standalone release
I kinda wish the plasma bombard was a rapier option
It just seems like it makes total sense for an artillery piece to have a bombard
Or even just a plasma mortar
the idea that the most advanced and toughest infantry need to 'stay safe' behind some ruins is bizarre.
I wish we had so many more rapier options
the only melee mech list that works is mass domitar;
It's not for them to hide behind ruins, but for them to harrass you with indirect fire as they lumber forwards to get a better shot.
Blast weapons don't scatter if they roll a hit, but if they fire indirectly they're forced to scatter.
Yeah I picture it as they're lobbing indirect plasma behind enemy fortifications as they advance.
Walking artillery that also has the potential to crush someone with a fist. Indirect isn't for them to hide, its so their enemies can't.
Be a super Tough unit thats mostly metal
Decide to lob plasma from behind cover instead of tanking shots like im supposed to
Be the thanatar cavas
Picture of Saturnine terminator unrelated
We also dont know the range. The plasma bombards might be 24 inches. Which isn't the longest range and would cement the idea of "firing at hidden troops while moving forward"
i hope its 72
if GW wanted saturnine to not stand still they'd have given them 7" move
Probably as a deep strike thing like other terminator teleportation
Means they can get some use out of their fists, I'd kit them out with dual guns if they were just footslogging
I want to rock those heavy disintegrators personally
Yeah they're pretty cool
I think they just deep strike. Come in, shoot, weather the retaliation, shoot again
this ruined the game for 15 years imho
The degradation of terrain rules over time is a real tragedy
I hope 3.0 gives us extensive terrain rules again. But I doubt it, and I doubt I'd like them if I did.
GW seems to love ghost-walking through walls, and I despise it
The idea that a Marine in battle plate can simply run through a concrete wall if he chooses to is pretty thematic, honestly. It's just spoiled by the fact that doing so can't degrade the wall (due to static terrain models) and also ordinary humans can do the same.
Have you seen 30k buildings? Ain't no way you're running through 6ft of solid plasteel lmao
Plus, it's less about thematics and more about gameplay. It means you can set up a unit behind a wall and it's completely, utterly, 100% unassailable until it chooses to walk forwards and charge whatever gets in range.
At least 40k gives you the ability to charge them, but in 30k you can't even charge someone who's behind a wall
Oh, I agree the rules are rubbish. But in principle, I don't mind the idea of Marines smashing through ruined walls.
It's also probably a case of wanting to make saturnine different from just a regular plasma cannon
Mass myrms is also good, same with shrimp
I don't really consider myrms to be a melee army.
They can shoot insanely well.
They kind of do everything.
Like if you cheap out on them you can fit a lot of melee capable dudes in your army, just take say Maxima bolters on their shoulders and roll with an axirach
They feel more like a multipurpose tool, capable of both melee and shooting, though they excel at shooting a tad mode, due to the changes of the WS chart
There’s a change to the WS chart?
from 1e to 2e
1e to 2e.
Ahh, gotcha
Does Reaping blow count how bulky the unit is that is using the weapon? An example is the Saturnine units count as 4. So the new Praetor has to be fighting 5 units to actually use it?
Sorry for the mistake but thank you for confirming.
Man that sucks for us Death Guard players.
Its basicly the old rampage rule
Would my Sergeant in power armor have to be by himself to use it?
Not if the opposing unit is bigger then his
It's the total size of the different units, not just in base contact anymore
Still trickier with how big that praetor/saturnine is, but yknow
yes
stick him on his own and send him in, he costs more than a contemptor anyways
Now there's an idea
So my 20 man blob of Tacticals would need to take some casualties to use it.
Nah totally brining him in a squad of six for deep strike fun. Turns one and two as alpha legion just became even more dangerous for opponents
six what, saturnine? because thats like 800pts right there
Yep
we have reinvented the nullificator deathstar
only this time its for killing tactical marines
And veterans, they only got a 3+ armour
oh yea
Exodus, sabatuer, and now saturnine death ball. It's 1k points but the rest can just be tactical or lernean terminators.
well, no one takes vets, but yes
and then you face someone with ws5 terminators and cry
Reaping blow sucks in 2.0. this new one might actually get used
Was wound allocation changed? If so then I'll just take it all on the preator.
the new one is just rage
dont think so?
Which is better than current reaping blow
Yeah we are not happy DG players.
The guess its time for the sergeant to do his job and then the preator.
for some units, not grey slayers abusing fenrisian axes
"abusing" a statistically worse weapon than Chainswords is a interesting take
reaping blow also just never works in challenges now
It rarely work in 2e as well. The rule sucked
it was definetly situational
It was way too clunky for worse performance than CS. Stalkers were a better unit in flexibility and load out.
Our house rule is that forests are line of sight blocking for models outside of it.
You clearly haven’t seen the fallout on the Dark angles sub haha
No I haven't.
just checked
some crazy doomposting
yeah its wild haha.
Hey let them doom post. Macca need to confirm his bias somewhere. Not hating on him but man it would be much harder to just discount him if he had anything positive to say about GW or heresy 2.0.
which one was macca again?
The outer circle
ahh, yeah I liked him a few years ago, but his overly salty nature really got on my nerves.
He's still around?
Ye
Yeah. Has had nothing but doom and gloom to say about 3.0 I still listen to him occasionally because he does have good points. Don't think he's a grifter or anything, just wish he could at least admit GW did some good things with 2.0.
he does have good points
Does he? It seems to be nothing but whinge whenever I've dipped a toe in
I probably share a lot of opinions with him about 3e lol but saying nothing good about 2e is just crazy.
I still miss so much from 1e, but 2e is still healthier for the gamer
he is pretty whingy
I have enough salt in my life with #hh-general
I'm amazed he managed to maintain that level of vitriol for the whole edition. Real dedication to hate.
wasn't he an iron warriors player? It would make sense if so lol
Waded through the cesspit and the leaker guy is still MIA
the leaker heresy it is then!
I just want to see like the reference pages or the shooting rules or something😭
He has some good points on balance issues, and correct criticism on GWs slow roll out of plastic infantry (even though that's because going into the edition they wanted to make vehicles more accessible for vetran players).
He also hung out with Arch so
Yeah, this is the main issue
Hobby maxxing instead if leaking
Arch was a black mark on the hobby for too long
I don't even remember what was wrong with a*ch, just that he had to change his name and that his accent makes watching him a chore
We speak not the name of the tarnished one
Openly racist
Among other things
Alt right nonsense, racist, generally cringe
ahh ok, now I remember
Just like the concentrated caricature of what people mean when they say "Warhammer fans" disparagingly
"I wonder what other videos this Guy makes"
"Oh, soft core anime porn reviews"
did he review interspecies reviewers or what? lol
Top ten [web nonsense terminology for soft core porn] of 2023
ah boring, got it
Followed by a 20 minute rant on custodes or something
I didn't have a very glowing view if the Guy after seeing that per se
So yeah idk how much weight Circle's actual analysis carries but I just don't have time for someone who sees someone like that and goes "oh we should do a podcast episode"
Big "Internet Historian hanging out with JonTron" energy
Now I am curious what happened there, but we don't need to flood the channel with more of topic stuff
I mean
One does nazi dogwhistles and plagiarises youtube videos
the other is JonTron
Neither are good things
when did he do any dogwhistles?
I don't doubt the plagirization claims though.
It's out there if you want o google it
yeah, gonna look into it, still thank you for bringing that to my attention.
This is the post to read
Anyway, back on topic
I don't disagree with him on how GW handles things. But his opinion on good rules, models aesthetics, and what makes a good game can be hit or miss and when he salts in game design it really does come off whingey
back on topic
doesn't the options on the saturnine praetor seem a bit anhemic?
compared with the tartaros or cata praetor, the dude has no options
that is the new MO with GW though, no sprue options, no ingame options. So no surprise there
The other praetors came out when options were more coming to include, even out of the box.
but none of the options look particuliarly great. Especially the cost on that teleport upgrade
MO with AoS/40k, not with SGS.
May also be because as a new armor type that seems keyed to bespoke weapons, it's less easy to port other profiles over
isn't an appeal of heresy being a great kitbashing game?
Tbh I'm kinda glad saturnine aren't stupidly broken
Saturnine Praetor isn't really anything to go off of right now.
It is - same as the rest of the SGS.
MESBG seems to be the odd one out right now, as it's pretty much wrapped up with licensing restrictions.
I'd really hate if this edition was the "you better play with the new stuff because everyone else is going to be"
I'm glad it's good but not so good you can't afford to not take saturnine
sats look decent-ish
Yeah I saw some people worried they would render old Termies obsolete
I want to see what desintegrators do (since is what wilph's sats have modelled
)
They seem very scary, but for both your target and your own unit
as is good and just
They don't make them obsolete, but they bode badly for plasma, mostly because of stats.
They have their niche, but other then the particle thing do none of the guns look that good
That doesn't seem like a "but" statement to me
I think the plasma change could be a direct consequence of the uptick of disintegrators becoming it's own range of weapons that needed it's own niche in the space marine arsenal
Depends on the price I guess
not like we were throwing plasma squads like maniacs into our lists
yeah, GW want to sell thise new sprues for guns that don't even fill the same niche. Disintegrators don't even get breaching or AP 2, so why nerf plasma even more? That should be their niche
Heavies are, regulars are S4AP3
harsh
str 5, but yes, no ap 2 anymore.
We don't want new players to use anything but saturnine stuff to kill saturnine after all/s
I mean Tart and cata don't have that many
- Choice of termie melee weapon or paragon blade
- Choice of combi-weapon
- Grenade harness
Kinda it isn't it?
they can also take various guns don't they
Oh you could take a volkite charger sure
But that's under the same choice as regular termies
And in my mind fell under "Choice of combi weapon"
werent we in meltaera just a day ago?
it's a bit weird isn't it?
Which would be sick as hell to wade into melee with a heavy gun firing and a paragon blade in the other and
we all like our mellee beat sticks, but some more options never hurt anyone
plasma blaster in one hand, chain fist in another
I am still holding out that Plasma Guns are now FP2. Yes the blaster used to be defined by its shorter range and assault 2, but it's only available for things that aren't standard marines. I could see it just being a plasma gun with shorter range, maybe more strength.
seems pretty appropiate for DA and WE
yeah, but the new box doesn't come with melta, now does it?
The logic is looking a little circular
Plasma now looks like it's supposed to be the jack of all trades gun. Maybe okay at everything between light, over heavy infantry up to medium armour. Like a rifle version of the autocannon.
Meanwhile disintegrators are the anti marine infantry weapons
Currently betting on heavy (fp). Could also work for calivers.
Makes sense to me, plasma tends to be presented as the next Tier over bolters
how?
Not volkite? They always seemed to me to be in the bolter++ role. Then plasma another level above that. Not sure where they'd sit now
What point was Kiavar making and what was your response?
centurion has it :D
That we are in a melta era and that the new box comes with 1 meltagun
touche, he's going to safe the iron warriors
get ready for the tarantula multimelta spam
new video dropped
(takes notes on my clipboard, face unreadable)
In this video, rampant pessimist Mechanid, discusses the new articles and stats by GW. :(
Character art by Svenrin Art Studio see more of her fantastic stuff here! site: https://svenrin.carrd.co
0:00 Intro
0:46 Challenges
4:16 List Building
14:43 Vehicles
19:39 Conclusion
Credits:
Wholesale Changes: https://www.warhammer-community.com/en-...
why must the mods punish me specifically with 5 second slow mode?
Post better
this is not a skill issue Genome
And yet
Who’s mechanid and why should I care?
He seems pretty new on the scene
I liked his video editing in some of the earlier vids but I didn't get the impression he's bringing much expertise to the table
For better or worse, not passing judgment on the outcome, but I agree that GW def wasn’t entirely honest or genuine with the changes they made to the system. Now will those changes pan out for the better? To be seen
I noticed that about the profile too, specifically the inability to take a shredder
are people mad today too?
stay mad stay malding
is the sky blue?
This probably isn't the place for an explanation
Just let the Saturnine take a little age, the kits are totally news, maybe we have legion specific stuff with them and with the years some options from campaigns ?
Last leaks were last week right?
Did we see rules for scatter rolls/blast weapons?
Blast (and barrage) yeah, but not the section on detailed scatter rolls itself
Yes
We have the Blast and Barrage special rules
Ah ok
The main notable change for blasts is that you roll a single to-hit roll for the template, and only scatter if that fails. Also, multiple blasts are far quicker to work out
Oh so if you hit you just get a direct hit essentially
Exactly
Well that’s nice, much better. That’s one of the main reasons I didn’t take plasma cannons on HSS
It was ages to roll out all the scatters
With multiple blasts, the streamlining is that you roll a to-hit for each blast shot, and set aside all the hits. If you missed with any, scatter the blast template ONCE and all the misses hit that point
Would I be safe to make destroyers with double alchem flamers for my Death Guard? Or should I wait? I hope they will stay in the new edition.
I don't see why not
Yeah
Part of a healthy and balanced diet, DG or not
I just wasn't sure would still be around
Alchem weapons might be still around, might not, but the flamer weapons you use to model them are going nowhere. It's just about making units that you think are cool
Also indirect blasts are forced to not make a hit test and individually scatter
Yeah
Barrage is a whole other thing I left out
True. Just don't have ton of money or time to waste.
Fair. You know your own stuff, but if you wanted to run fancy legion hand-flamers on a unit, no harm in running regular hand-flamers if the fancy ones are removed. Still fits well for DG either way
It would? Awesome. I figured Bolt Pistols would fit better but that's awesome to know.
Here's the thing. Even if alchem flamers get removed... You can still call 'em alchem flamers.
Legions were broad things. Destroyers specialise in killing things, hard. Rad grenades and missiles, anti-psychic flamers, etc. Chemical weapons fits DG, but even if they're not putting nasty stuff in the fuel, it's a radiation soaked unit drowning the enemy in fire. Destroyers are a very DG unit regardless of loadout
I don't think anyone's gonna flip the table if you say your flamers use the same rules as normal but look different
Also that ^
Thank you both. I'm more about the fluff then crunch and I want to make sure the army makes sense.
See, if fluff is your priority, you're free to do almost anything!
100%
Not every DG flamer was alchem (I imagine that stuff was probably a supply nightmare). They were a legion of marines with the full arsenal, from duelling sabres to sniper rifles, so equip them however you want, or how you think is cool.
I just want to know my liber rules at this point
"Have you fixed my army this edition?"
My idea was Loyalists who just want to kill traitors anyway they can. As painfully as they can.
Hey, if alchem rules return, sick (heh). If not, you've got a dangerous close-range radiation unit.
You probably can hold off a month anyway and see the army book rules
According to Black Book 1: Betrayal,
"Bolter, melta and flamer were now the trinity of weapons around which their wargear was based, keeping supply needs to a minimum."
So DG definitely made heavy use of flamers
I'll probably hold off just to be sure.
I forgot the Flamer part. Thank you!
Did we learn what the Overload rule does at some point? I looked through the leaks and found nothing
We have the blurb in the original weapons article, but nothing more
It's missing from the leaked keywirds
It hits the user with X hits on a 1, but not the full wording
I love special rules that I know will be used by multiple armies that aren't in the core rulebook
They can bond over their shared trinity with the sororitas
If they stayed loyal they would bond over hating the same things too.
pretty sure they said on a roll of x you get hit your own squad so i would venture to say overload two would give you a wound one a roll of a 1 or 2.
Yknow, I think you're right, I checked the article. Not sure what I was confusing it with
I mean there have been loads of rules so easy to confuse stuff. I could also be wrong it’s not a definitive definition and it’s free text from warcom so who knows haha.
I think I just figured out where the Little Sisters of Purification came from
Always happy to help clear things up. lol
What is important to know: are wounds allocated by overload keeping their AP or not (like HH2.0)?
Loyalist Death Guard Geneseed?
always looking for an excuse to add a contingent of sisters of silence to my collection
Overload says they target your own unit
Which suggests that all AP, damage, and special rules are preserved to hit you
based upon the comment of gw are you hit with your own gun, sooo...
I could have sworn I saw actual rules text for Overload (X) posted somewhere, but I guess I imagined it.
it seemingly isnt even in the core rulebook, as I didnt find it in any of the leaks
Yeah, they're doing the same daft split of half the rules being in the Core, and the other half being scattered around the Libers.
These books are done at the same time and still the didn't show up in the main rulebook. Preposterous
Same as Brutal in 2nd
And I just know Overload is gonna be one of those rules where I think "that has to be a core special rule" and spend 5 minutes flipping through the core rulebook before giving up and grabbing the liber
Maybe some traits like Overload will be found in the shooting section.
They should just print all the core special rules in the libers as well
No splitting them out
It's silly, annoying, and wastes gametime
Very unlikely, I'd say. But not impossible, you're right.
That's worse imo 
Cause they are Weapons Traits and not "universal" per say. A model can't have the Overload trait attach to it.
A model also can't have Template or Pistol but they're in the USR section of the Core
If we put both books 20 metres apart it is going to be a little workout to read the rules at least. /s
You're right, I didn't realized those rules were in the leaks
But we are still missing some rules, like the Assault trait for weapon. It's said that it's needed to make a volley fire during the charge phase, but what I want to know is if it needed if we want to shoot and charge.
In 2nd Ed it was written in the shooting section.
As Bolter lost the Rapid Fire, and it seems it's gone for good, and as the Heavy rule doesn't state that you can't charge, I am quite worried...
We're missing the whole section on who is allowed to charge and what else they can do on their turn, yeah.
Assault is a trait right? Not a speciap rule?
Yes
I think the distinction is special rules do things
Traits don't do anything directly, but other rules use traits
Yes, I mismatch a bit the naming convention. Traits doesn't have rules attached to them right ? They are only refered to in other rules ?
Ah you pre shot my answer ahah
I think it's not great form that some things can be both, like there's a Melta trait and a Melta (X) special rule.
But that was an issue last edition as well
It seems every weapon category is now a trait too
Which I assume is mostly to save arguing with Salamanders players what is and isn't a plasma weapon
(Nothing against Sallies, but that's where it came up to me)
Anyone has the link from the latest Leaks for me, please?
i think this is it?
Legend
remember you can just add /zip the the end of the URL to download the whole album
It’s says the link is expired 😩
But also any info dropped today about the dreadnought stats or weapons? I didn’t see anything in the two articles but thought I may have missed something
Nothing other than art suggesting they can take two of the same gun, and reveals of new guns
Monday we had kit and lore article for the saturnine termi, Thursday the rules, and today lore and design articles for the dread. It's likely we'll have the rules tomorrow 🙂
Probably Imgur servers being poop, worked for me earlier!
Worked just now, both on my phone and desktop, so try again!
Yup worked now!
nope, thats tomorrow
same as with the terminators
And what about a leak of the weapon charts? 😁
To give them credit, I was impressed that they posted pretty much the full datasheets for the termies and praetor. Beats small edited snippets
More of that, please
so at least we know it's coming
We've already seen 'how to model these' sections in the snippets, so I would doubt this meme
It’s also a new kit with limited options… not like other kits you can use other weapons etc
We know the dread has new weapons coming in the future as well so there will be more options in time
And as you say they’ve already said you can use this squad to model this unit
What indicates this is coming?
Nothing does.
I think we've seen enough proof that GW is being more lax with 30k than 40k.
But stricter than they have been, at least for new units.
It seems future units added in supplements are going to be "official kitbashes" of their various weapon/upgrade kits
Existing units are likely to keep their existing options.
Doomposting
Also worth noting that the Saturnine stuff isn't "no model no rules" like 40k is.
The Saturnine are allowed to double up on weapons, but the kit only includes one of each for each Terminator.
Same as the Dread - you can take double guns but only get one of each in the kit
Yeah it’s also a new kit with limited options… it’s not gonna have a lot in general 
I think it is valid to point out though that these kits have fewer options than previous things did, certainly for the Saturnine.
Other Terminators had a whole schmorgesboard of options right from the get-go, more than 40k Terminators ever had.
The Saturnine Dread at least has a similar amount of options as a Leviathan always had. But Leviathans have always been on the low end for 30k optionality
I can’t see these guys having stuff like autocannons or flamers etc just the way they want the armour to work with the ball joints etc
So it’s weapons that doesn’t use conventional ammunition
We’ve got disintegrators and plasma
I also hope the dread doesn’t get a CC choice, keep it ranged so it’s good at that but vulnerable to a pissed off leviathan
The augur command squad existing already disproves this
The Saturnine Praetor is the main one where the options are strictly limited to what's in the box. It's a huge step down even from the Cataphractii Praetor. I can understand people being a bit disappointed by that.
Thats just a problem with these bespoke wargear models
Any power weapon or whatever he could take would be worse anyway
But would of course have been nice with more, didnt even get a flamer option
Problem is more the very ecclectic choice you got. Two medium ranged weapons that can easily kill the termis, plus a fist with a great short ranged weapon for the squad, and a character with a good melee weapon but barely anything worthwile in range for his squad.
feels like the og landraider, were they can do nothing really well.
Yeah, exactly. He could have had the option of a particle shredder, which we know is a Saturnine weapon, but he can't take one because it's not in the box.
There's still plenty of flexibility in the system and loads of units will still have their full variety of options, I don't think there's any need for doomposting about it. But it's also fine to acknowledge that when new kits are released, they're going to be far more limited in options and mostly restricted to what's in the box.
Not specifically, the models were designed to be dual purpose
Or rather, the unit was designed to be represented in a specific way
NMNR isn't hard line black and white, otherwise we'd have separate kits for tank commanders vs regular russes/dorns in 40k
What is happening?
Worries your weapon options will be limited to whatever you can build in the box
It is a week since the last leak, innit? GW really got him
Ok so just on some normal anxiety since we have no new update
Pretty much
Gotta keep the doom spiral going
lol fair enough
Theres going to be some stuff still, like i bet that unit made from the rapier crew dont get options because the crew don't, but that they exist and say to use a model that doesnt really exist is a good sign anyway
The game will be here eventually.
Then we will see all of it.
Some content creators probably already have the books
I need to see the libers.
I want to have something to complain about.
What's warhammer without complaining?
i mean they could always just release "saturnine assault squad" or upgrade pack with a pdf rules lately
lets be real here is they had an option to take idk, twin saturnine claws, yet those wouldnt be in the box, we would be malding about "why give thing in the book but not give thing in the sprue"
Yeah that's the tradeoff
I definitely get the annoyance but I also remember building my T'au army and hearing everyone say "The best loadout for Crisis Battlesuits is maximum Cyclic Ion Blasters. You can get one of them in an HQ unit's kit and nowhere else."
So it's a balance
And now theyre gone, i think
I'm gonna be real I would have loved if we had the 10e crisis rules when I was building those guys. I'd actually be able to make a decision.
Did the page for weapon types leak? Like what they mean
They probably mean nothing just like in 2ed. We have already weapon types and it is just a keyword for other rules
Weapon traits don't do anything on their own, they're just there for special rules to reference so you know exactly which weapons it applies to
The number of leaks this week is insufficient
Not much left to leak
they could leak cool artwork...
-# Like Seperoth ||Sephiroth
||
We still don't have unit subtype rules.
A lot of the vehicle rules.
Cover rules.
They might have been got
I don't think we got these at all.
The leaker is busy sleeping😴
Wen liber
i have hard people have had great results by breaking into cars in the area around warhammer world
Ork snipers got him 😔
Seriously, do you honestly buy into these leak stories? To me the whole thing feels staged. GW ran into trouble before and surely learned from it. Think about the odd timing: barely a day separates the launch of “The Horus Hearsay” website and the photo of the boxed sets that popped up online. Then you have leaks dribbling out, each one careful to dodge the book’s most wanted sections. The information is being rationed straight from the source; it is a tightly managed PR move.
The real leaks will drop once the new HH edition goes up for pre-order on their website. By then, artists, influencers and distributors will already have the products at home, ready to reveal every bit that has stayed hidden so far. Until that day, the only leaks we get are the ones GW is willing to let slip.
I'm sorry man but if you've ever worked with PR departments then you know that this would not be on the table, I get why it's such a tantalising theory but I can pretty much guarantee it isn't real.
Dumping large swathes of information without any fanfare is not good for hype long term, not to mention all the information control issues faced because of it.
I’m not on the same page. Keeping a tight lid on product details and deciding exactly when to lift it has a huge effect on the community. Dripping out information stirs hype and keeps everyone talking. Plenty of modern PR teams dive into tactics like this without blinking.
GW clearly still has growing pains with their information security, doesn't help that production is now occurring in a country where there is somewhat widespread knowledge of your products.
Things need to be produced months in advance at the very least. When the production is happening in china then leaks aren't as much an issue because there isn't really anyone who has motivation to leak, or to buy sketchy FB marketplace listings. When it's in the UK it's another can of worms.
Every former member of GW who has left and gone on record about it (that I remember), such as Peachy etc during his Painting Phase days, have said that GW absolutely do not intentionally leak things. I'm not saying it's something they won't ever do at some point, but they are or were not that sort of company
They're literally already doing the drip tactic via articles
Which the leaks devalue
Release is more than a month out, dumping all of the rulebook is one go pretty much takes away 90% of what you could have teased and revealed. That's absolutely a hype killer.
Remember how much anticipation there was for the weapons article? And then how no one really cared about the list building once it was leaked?
Also there have been people saying tinfoil shit like this since the very first leak photos and their arguments never stand up except for the people who are just invested in believing them
We've heard all this before and it wasn't convincing the first dozen times
Even if all the leaks were staged what value would gw gain from leaking pretty much the entire contents of their new rulebook a month or two before release
Or leaking their big product reveal for their big tournament event over a week or two before the event derailing the whole thing.
Or launching a whole advertising campaign build up just to derail all of that and scuttle all the money and plans they had for it.
What value does any of that bring other than making GW look like utter fools to their investors
It doesn't build up hype nearly as well. Essentially blows GWs load without them even being in the room months before it should've been and now they've gotta reveal even more just to try and have some sort of content to keep fans engaged until release
I’m still not sold. Watching the official Heresy or Hearsay page pick those leaks right back up the very next day feels bold, to say the least. Can anyone point to a single leak so far that has actually derailed GW’s rollout of HH 3? From where I sit, every leak just fills in the gaps and keeps the buzz going rather than wrecking it.
So unless gw starts dipping into the libers for content they're gonna be running out of hype material pretty much now
if you look for a conspiracy you can find one when you ignore all evidence that counters your opinion. this is like being a flat earther
Hey, I'm not seeing conspiracy, haha. Just seeing here a good strategy. No more, no less.
A conspiracy, man, please, choose carefuly your words 🙂
The army building rules leaking the day before the long-awaited army building article, is not "good strategy"
GW isnt some sneaky company that will seed doubt with ex employees, existing employees, and their friends. its just a place that people work, spend time doing things, and people latch on to them being this evil super power.
i did.
Making your company look like absolute fools and destroying your credibility to run a decent marketing campaign without getting upstaged and completely toppled by some guy and his potato camera doesn't seem like grand strategy to me
Weapon charts, legion abilities and charts would be "real" leaks. This is what I say.
all belong to a book that hasnt been stolen and resold on ebay.
Customers love leaks but investors and stock holders etc want to see their money actually paying for things that will generate them more money. I.e. viral add campaigns not getting scuttled by some German man with a phone or some guy stealing a box in florida or what ever
German man with a Phone, do you speak about the 40k mission cards?
most leaks source from the people that do translations as they are contracted out to independent companies that are not as strict in keeping the lid on things
There have been more than a few occasions where leaks have originated from Germany due to some guy taking snaps of product that entered into the warehouse or local stores prior to it's actual reveal date
Indeed
As I mentioned earlier, once a product goes up for pre-order, leaks start to appear because the items have already reached the retailers. This is normal and accepted by GW.
It is not "accepted". Its incredibly difficult to prevent.
In this modern era of clout farming everyone wants to be first
You break the news and suddenly you're the centre of attention for an entire community
On preorder day reviews go out so its not even a leak at that point.
Look a the guy who leaked the rulebook. Pretty much the whole community was waiting for him to get done with work to leak more
To be honest, if you have good contacts at certain retailers, you can snag the product the same day pre-orders go live.
Look, SecretFire, like I said, if any of us were gonna buy this we would have already. Maybe you're right and that makes us dummies but continuing to try and convince us is only going to cause mutual annoyance.
Which would also result in that person getting fired or the retailer losing their contract with GW if it was ever reported with evidence.
Yeah, it happens all the time, and the people who snag these items keep quiet. That is just how it is, sorry.
I dont know what youre saying sorry for. i'm not denying that it does happen, im denying the idea that GW is okay with it or intentionally do these things.
I really appreciate everyone’s perspective, but I think it may be best to pause the discussion here. I probably shouldn’t have shared my initial comment, and it feels like we’re no longer moving forward. Let’s let it rest for now. Thanks for understanding.
Wonder why Plasma seems to be moving to breaching 5+.
Are they trying to reduce the access of AP2 in the game or just trying to push people to buy disintegrators?
Really odd choice since plasma felt very balanced last edition.
Yeah plasma changes feel a little confusing so far, maybe the gun will still have a breaching 4+ option idk
Since Disintigrators are plenty in the new box that seems unlikely
Well that's still incentive to buy the new box isn't it? But yeah I'm not exactly sold on that being the reason.
i hope that he didnt go to sleep because GW got him
It is an interesting choice, for sure. Disintegrator weapons have definitely stolen plasma's former niche of 'weapons that are deadly for the target but also dangerous for the user'. Now plasma is in a weird sort of limbo where it's not really the 'best fit' for any particular task, it's more of a generalist all-rounder that's okay in any situation.
From what we know at the moment, it looks like disintegrators are very dangerous for the user, even up to and including the Saturnine stuff. So weirdly plasma is now the 'safer' choice for people who don't want to gamble with their lives.
I also think the breaching 5+ or 6+ might be to balance out some other aspects. I'm willing to bet plasma guns will be 2 shots at 24" all the time like bolters. Nerfing breaching a bit might be the comprise to pumping out more shots on average all the time.
To me it is the rulebook and the models. People buying the box for those guns only to prepare for a new meta are morons imho
New disi(infantry mounted) is always ap3. Plasma is ap whatever, but with a potential of ap 2. They can coexist, just like powerswords and charnabal sabres did in 2.0
Oh, I didn't realise anyone actually used charnabal sabres. But yeah, that seems like an apt comparison.
i took that personally
im sorry man but if you ever worked with PR you know this is 100% on the table
do you think they just tell everyone at the company or something
It might be on the table, but not seriously considered. Games Workshop has had a 'leak' issue since its inception. You think they'd be able to keep a 'leak department' under wraps all this time?
What portion of the community watches the leaks anyway ?
the very invested part
sure, but those 3 still have to coordinate for leaks to get out. You're trying to find reasons to get around a universal rule: occam's razor
occams razor in this specific case suggest deliberate leaks
Yeah so is it really an issue to have leaks ? They (us) are so invested they gonna buy anyway 😂 and for the vast majority they just learn the news from GW or their LGS.
And there's another major reason that leaks wouldn't be coordinated: shareholders. If a leak gets out that's misjudged or so bad that it affects the sales of an item, then shareholders can sue the company if they find out the company itself is leaking their own product.
leaks drip feed exactly whats coming the next few days
if i had that book in hand its entirety would already be in everyones hands
youre the one right now grasping to reasons why these leaks cannot possibly be voluntary
In this case, absolutely not. It's like a bastardization of Hanlon's Razor. "Never assume malice when incompetence will suffice." Only in this case it's "Never assume conspiracy when incompetence will suffice."
And the first leaks started way after the leak of the box.
secret marketing is neither conspiracy nor malice
from my perspective you're the one grasping as to why coordinated leaks would be a thing. Your willfully ignoring key parts of international business and overestimating GW's ability to do any of what you're suggesting.
whats hard about the head of marketing telling an employee to put shit on 4chan
what is so implausible about that
are you even aware of what happened?
Someone stole several boxes. It's on camera. He was a warehouse worker that didn't even fully understand what they were, but he knew they were valuable so he threw them up on Ebay
Didn't even take decent pics of the product. Some madlad bought one of them and cracked it open to take pics of the book
did anyone get arrested
If they did, it wasn't newsworthy

gestures to the rest of the world considering what else is going on
Does Target publically post whenever a bike is stolen out of their store and someone is arrested? Heck no.
I watched a guy steal three bikes, one after the other. It wasn't until the 4th attempt that he was arrested.
yeah ok, gw probably leaked a lot of the shit we've seen
If you didn't work for the company, you'd have no idea it happened.
But hey, just like flat earthers, you're welcome to believe what you want. If it comes to light that GW legitimately leaks stuff purposefully, I guess I'll look the fool.
I'm very confident I will not look the fool.
just keep coping
you too buddy
cope
<@&973697908815827014> At this point it feels like this guy is just baiting.
Children, Behave
Yesterday it was plasma nerf… now it’s arguing over a leak issue
Ahh never a dull day 
I feel real dumb being baited into such an idiotic argument, but here we are.
I do think it's weird that the leaks we get are so consistently incomplete and universally photographed with potatoes. That's not to suggest some grand conspiracy, I just wish that maybe once some unreleased material could end up in the hands of someone with a more systematic mind and a handle on the basic use of a scanner.
For is defense, the books are not really scanner friendly except if you don't mind bending the pages a lot
Everyone in the modern world has a freakin twentythousand megagigapixel camera on the phone in their pocket. It's so reliable that banks accept checks photographed through their apps.
Hmm I got a book I shouldn’t and could leak it..
Do I square it up and take pics seeing as I’m not in fact in a rush and it’s not a bomb…
Shitty angle and blurry as fuck is the best I can do 
I wonder what the simplest explanation for this extremely reliable pattern is
this is what the content of my book looks like from across the room
further away
when the whole votann codex for 40kek leaked and they had to issue a public apology, that was probably part of some elaborate marketing campaign, right?
idk how we suddenly forgot that they actually had to push the dropsite preview forward in time because the box leaked
i don't know
I mean that happened. Tyranid codex for 9th edition was leaked like a month (maybe month and a half) before its actual release, which led to people just not ordering the book
I would know, im that people
Just look on how many people in here or on B&C are whining the whole time how bad the rules are and that they won't buy it. Those are lost customers to gw because of the leak. Or not, who knows how serious those comments are. Some of them cry about everything for years now without really stepping away from the game annoyingly enough😏
theyre not, they will buy the book or they will pirate it
if they pirate it they will have some kind of rationalization for it
if they buy theyll say nobody plays 2.0 so they are forced to play 3.0
Hehe yeah that sounds like them
Complaining about GW is a whole hobby in itself
And I thought my friend and I complained about GW because we are french, but I am glad to note this is international 😂
don't sniff hobby glue kids, it'll get you believing all sorts of crazy things
Wait is this still from the main rulebook?
Oh nvm it's from the current liber isn't it
I was confused for a moment about why scout armour would be in the main rulebook
sitting in a bin
Hide a predator beside one of these
One between each of two legs
Scorpius in the back, predators in the front. Our own little fortress
fully within 3"
Not sure it fits
HSS could fit though, 5++ lascannons
i doubt that is as interesting
unless they changed cover saves
Clearly you should put a bunch of tarantulas next to it
TRUUUUUUUUUUE
it all makes sense now
and solar aux can just ally it in now even easier
Going to ally 10 moritats that get BS6 with the prime bonus, easy game
Big "Don't talk to me or my sons ever again" energy
I am imagining mother hen and her chicks.
Rapiers seems like the sensible choice
Sit quad mortars next to this and just shell stuff
RIP the leaker. Tragic that James Workshop found him and had him crucified outside Warhammer world😔
Its true, he's chained to the front of the Ultramarines rhino as an example to everyone
The Pinkerton's got him
And the friends name was Bonebreaker Bobby
Don't blame him, he's probably stressed because people keep asking for more and more reveals