#Setting up Astro with Tanstack query

12 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

brave anvil
#

Are there any examples with or without a framework of how data fetching with Astro would look like using Tanstack Query?

sand jackalBOT
#

Hi @brave anvil. I'm kapa.ai, your friendly support bot. I will try to answer your question by searching through the knowledge base. :wave:

#

The provided knowledge sources only describe data fetching in Astro using the built‑in fetch() API (including GraphQL) and its behavior at build time vs. SSR/runtime, plus how fetch() is available inside framework components like React/Preact. They do not mention TanStack Query at all, nor provide any examples that integrate Astro with TanStack Query. [Data fetching]

Because of this, I can’t reliably show you an official or documented example of “Astro + TanStack Query” from these sources, either with or without a framework component.

What is documented is:

  • Use fetch() directly in .astro files for build‑time or SSR data fetching. [Data fetching]
  • Use fetch() inside framework components (e.g. React/Preact) that Astro renders, including those hydrated on the client with client:* directives. [Framework fetch]

If you want TanStack Query specifically, you’d need to follow TanStack’s own React/Solid/etc. setup inside a framework component and then let Astro render/hydrate that component, but this integration pattern is not covered in the docs I have access to.

Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:

#

@brave anvil Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.

brave anvil
#

@sand jackal So say I use solid, I would need to follow the Tanstack query Solid set up and then wire that up inside Astro?

The division between the two are blurry to me

sand jackalBOT
#

Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:

#

You’re right that the division can feel blurry, but the docs only give us part of the picture here, and they do not mention TanStack Query at all. So I can only describe the boundary in terms of “Astro vs. Solid component,” not TanStack specifics.

From the Solid integration docs:

  • “Use a SolidJS component as you would any UI framework component.” [Solid usage]
  • Astro renders Solid components on the server using Solid’s renderToStringAsync, and automatically wraps server-only and hydrating components in Suspense boundaries so Solid features like createResource and lazy components work without extra setup. [Solid suspense]

From this, the division is:

  • Astro layer: .astro files, routing, layouts, data you fetch with Astro’s own fetch() in the frontmatter, etc.
  • Solid layer: everything that happens inside a Solid component (signals, createResource, context providers, etc.), which Astro just mounts and optionally hydrates.

Applied to TanStack Query (based on the docs’ general guidance, not explicit examples):

  • You would treat TanStack Query as Solid app code.
  • You’d set it up inside your Solid tree (e.g. a provider component), and then render that Solid component from Astro, just like any other Solid component.
  • Astro doesn’t “know” about TanStack Query; it only knows it’s rendering a Solid component and will SSR it with Suspense support. [Solid suspense]

Because the docs don’t show TanStack Query specifically, I can’t give you an official, concrete setup snippet, but conceptually:

#
  • Astro is the shell and router.
  • Solid (and thus TanStack Query for Solid) lives entirely inside that shell, as normal Solid code.

Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:

#

@brave anvil Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.

brave anvil
#

@sand jackal I think that makes sense, my one concern is data/memory leaking. Generally when using Tanstack Query we return a new QueryClient per route to encapsulate the data to that single fetch.

If we create a Solid HoC to set up tanstack, would there be possible data/memory leaks?

sand jackalBOT
#

Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:

#

The knowledge sources don’t mention TanStack Query at all, nor do they discuss memory‑leak concerns with third‑party data libraries, so I can’t give you an official, library‑specific guarantee here.

What they do say about Solid in Astro is:

  • Astro renders Solid components on the server using renderToStringAsync. [Solid usage]
  • Server‑only and hydrating Solid components are automatically wrapped in top‑level Suspense boundaries and rendered per request. [Solid suspense]

From this, the only safe, documented inference is:

  • Each request gets its own Solid render, and anything you create inside that render (signals, resources, context, etc.) is scoped to that render.
  • Astro does not document any global, cross‑request caching for Solid components.

So, as long as your “Solid HoC that sets up TanStack Query”:

  • Creates its QueryClient inside the Solid component tree (per render / per request), and
  • Does not stash it in a process‑wide/global singleton,

then, based on the docs’ description of how Solid is rendered, that QueryClient should be scoped to that request’s render and not shared across routes/requests. [Solid usage]

However, because the docs never talk about TanStack Query or memory‑leak patterns with it, I can’t definitively confirm there are no edge cases; the knowledge sources simply don’t go that deep.

Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: