#NH90
142 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

@smoky relic
Oh my fucking days
Don't ever cook again with these suggestions
Check every posts I made at #livery-creation-and-discussion and #public-creations , the nh90 progress are there
Like honestly
The best thing you can do rn is give me cockpit references
At this point these things become a reminder now
Also if there were absolutely no devs making nh90, where are the fucking blueprints and stats?
These kinds of suggestions with low effort are dogshit like there are a lot of implications most original posters make but most of the time devs would still require a research of what they mean
#suggestion-rules + #rejected-suggestions in the future read this for more information about the art of suggesting
do we really need that
I'm at that point of the nh90

Suggestions ban speedrun any % @hasty delta
Isn't OP the guy who has already made several controversial suggestions?
Fr
I still waiting for his mute in suggestions 
no bc some of mine actually make sense
yea
If it wasn't announced anywhere else then it's not his fault
that and also oxtpo isn’t listed as a modeler for the game like anywhere
how was the suggester supposed to figure out that this was coming to the game when a non-dev only posted wip photos of it in the wrong channel
bro’s acting like we were all supposed to be aware
chronic
reactors not being helpful too good lord
Im only there to dogpile
If monke see
, monke go 
you can expect people to check other suggestions or #dev-showcase with reason to see if a plane is being worked on
only really active people in #livery-creation-and-discussion would know they could check there
^ I think of the same perspective as this person above this message
Well to be honest not everybody focus or expect to see these progress because it's just because it feels and people would focus on the building showcase channel more than the livery-creation-and-request channel there because build progress isn't expected there
Even I admit I don't check that channel out because I didn't expect build progress on a specific model there, I'm not as active on this server so I can't be up-to-date on progress on what's being worked on as of right now, and that could lead to a possibility of accidently suggesting something like this
never make a suggestion again 🔥
you need to provide a description of your suggestion when suggesting
If it’s a vehicle it is extremely helpful to provide blueprints and statistics
The description does not entail “I think X would be cool to have in aeronautica. You should add X to Aeronautica!”
i love the nh90 :3
when nh90 prankbros 
guys guys when community contributor dc role real 🗣️ 
anyways yea 24 people dogpiling and calling op clueless in a legitimately ok suggestion (minus the fact that they're missing some specific stats a dev could easily look up themselves in 5 seconds if they're not lazy because it's a well-known helicopter (and people could simply politely remind op to include those)) because a person without some kind of contributor tag in the discord posted wip pics in the wrong channels is insane to me
and people really called me crazy for saying this game's community can be really toxic sometimes
just wild bro
hm shrug so i readed the first words, so basicly this was suggested idk how many times now idk, i dont try to be toxic, i just see that clueless emoji and click on it lol ye idk, but ngl sometimes people should jus read the suggestion rules

isn't it even in this suggestion rules thing
hm
nah
it isn't
hm
last time it was suggested was over 3 months ago which i believe is the requirement
it says "planned" on the old suggestion however there's been no mention of it in any official place
per player i think it was standing there like that and not the same plene/heli/boat etc. 
hm shrug
ah
repost
hm
idk
but
if he saw the old suggestion then he should see basicly the model from foxtrot

anyways
could we get this a planned tag
cause
ye
Nah
It’s a community contrib model
that's even more wild then
There’s no guarantee for it to be added
uhm
this thread keeps getting better
I put planned since it makes sense
Even from community
Foxtrot has contributed before several times iirc
Ok we but can’t just add a planned tag because someone is making something in #public-creations
it’s likely to be added because of foxtrots history
But it isn’t planned in a official way
No but then again planned doesn't mean confirmed to be added
No need for a tag for every little thing
It still shouldn’t become standard to add planned tags for cc planes
ok
Nah it's more of a case-by-case thing
Yeah
people shouldn't dogpile with clueless emojis when this gets suggested again in 3 months then lol
it has even more clueless reaction than the last nh90 suggestion lol
true
petition to remove that emoji so that aeronautica players have to actually use their brains and be helpful for once
ye idk i suggested sometime something with fire fighting basicly an idea, and uh the first thing that was reacted clueless and later fly posted yt link there lol
like
its
just

Peak riogri
Peace leude was geht ab 🗣
ich bins marvin 🗣️
Und kelvin
Heute fliegen wir Hubschrauber um 3 Uhr nachts 🗣
und der game master verfolgt uns mit privat jet 🗣️
Du hast gekocht
rule 3.8 moment
was ist das 
Give it the ability to mount heavy machine guns at the cost of having the side doors always open
Why? Because in brm5 it can





shhh, both M314D 7.62x51mm (Right) and FN M3M GAU-20 .50cal 12.7x99mm (Left) are sleeping! keep the door closed until service is ready (they can be opened or closed)
theres more than what meets the eye
cuz i make aeronautica content too
last vid 1 year

