#An-124 used for crafting An-225
284 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
it doesnt?
Surprisingly, no
finnee
Where exactly is the source for the 'takes less than 20 mins' take
It’s easy to add
An-124 remodel 🙏
yez
How is this realistic
They are 2 different plane types
The an-225 is based off the 124 but uses a completely different specification for the buran

Adding An-124 to the crafting recipe would make sense
Makes the an-225 less obtainable
getting an An-124 probably isn't the hardest part

I mean i own one
True
I feel that the An-225 is already hard enough as is to get
Also isn't the only thing that the An-225 pulled from the an-124 the engines?
No 
not really
An-124 already had a use for grinding
An-225 was built from scratch (sure it's based design in at least one way)
when
Do it yourself >:3
Ok
that's from august
B-but it’s realistic!
do you wanna spend an additional 150k to get the plane

Jokes on you I already have it
would you want to spend an additional 150k if you didnt have it

Peasants who don’t have it don’t matter to me
But I’m a chill guy
if you did not have it, would you spend an additional 150k on top of the kit

- currently the only vehicle with a blue rarity donor aircraft is the 1.42 Foxglove, and thats only a 4-part kit.. 225 is a 10 part kit


i vote
simply because the kit has too many parts already 
This isn't a democracy 
But most likely nobody will ever do anything about this

Fair
it's already ~1 million


It would be annoying to have to hunt for an124 just to craft it especially when it’s a 10 part kit
I might when I finish 124 remodel


cope

It wasn’t, 225 is stretched 124 with additional gear and H shaped tailed
For that you must remodel 225 too because convert into completely model doesn’t make any sense
I’m not remodeling 225
But
while I’m doing 124 stuff in configuration
I might as well add the 124 to the 225s crafting requirements
I just told you it doesn’t make sense because you’re converting new model into model which A) completely different mesh wise B) less detailed
it was built from the ground up no?
No
Well I can’t remodel the 225
i don't think you can convert a 124's airframe into it
isn't the uh
wing structure completely different
and this suggestion makes sense
"Antonov studied the way of building a transport plane of greater capacity by making modifications on the An-124 model"
How it was built? I don't have an answer but my hypothesis here is that it was built from scratch and is not a conversion
Description of the transport plane Antonov 255 and its function nowadays.
you kinda proved my point
But requiring the an-124 only makes sense if the aircraft was built using an already built airframe
if you guys want it to be realistic you should make it that you need an An-225 to craft the An-225
(new an-225 built from mriya's wreck)
Crazy

how does a second, unfinished an-225 exists then?
derivative
This
not a conversion
the difference between conversion and derivative is that conversion is when an existing airframe gets modified, and derivative is when they build a new plane that shares something with the original one
Although, are there other aircraft that could be applied to this same logic? I know there probably is but I can't meaningfully think of any right now.

the shared part is the fuselage
Having a similar UV for both makes sense right
Verifiable?
Look at the plane

It’s quite literally a heavier-duty an124

So your saying you can confirm that an An-124 fuselage was used to make the An-225?
And when I say used, it was used for the construction
The design for the AN225 is based off the AN124’s design
Because it’s much cheaper to reuse an existing tried and true design than to make another from scratch
regardless it makes complete sense to base the AN124 and AN225 off the same UV because then you could carry a livery from one onto the other
That's outside scopes
design
not a part of a fuselage
And that's already been noted
But this I will not confirm or deny since there are examples where this hasn't gone well
erm

There’s been zero bad examples thus far
(The last item is outside scopes of suggestion)
Makes little sense for them to retrofit an existing aircraft into a heavy duty application used for carrying a fucking space shuttle, but again it’s the Soviets we are talking about
Shouldn't dwell on that either because it would be easy to go outside scope of suggestion
If the AN225 is crafted with the AN124 it would make sense for them to have the same UV so that your liveries on the AN124 would carry over to the AN225 when you craft it.
The wings are different, and the fuselage is different
Or at least a similar UV
The main fuselage design is extremely similar, thus the fuselages can be projected together onto the map in blender and placed in the same spot
Thus, your fuselage ID would carry over
They don't differ in length??
They are still an extremely similar design
plus - you could make a livery for both the AN124 and AN225 at the same time
And just extend the fuselage part of the AN225’s livery instead of having to reorient EVERYTHING
If the UV ends up split in multiple parts as some others are then that wouldn't work as intended
agreed but if not then it would

It’s the devs choice which kind of map they do afaik
But off topic to "should the an-225 require the an-124 for crafting"
(livery carrying over during the crafting is not off topic)
Should*
Assuming an-124 is required or not
Life said he’d do it
That's assuming the suggestion is accepted
So it’s planned?

Ahem
Tags don't say so
I kno
But if this is accepted then mayhaps certain other aircraft should also be applied to this
Does this mean planned or nah Life
(This entire thread should be denied because there isn’t much benefit, it would only increase the cost of each aircraft, and because it may require a remodel)

Life said he’s gonna do a 124 remodel
But then enclaved said the 225 would have to be remodeled
Which I don’t get
There's been no proof of the an-225 being a conversion from the 124
Cus this is just adding 124 to the crafting recipe
It should actually use components of the 124 in the construction
If the 124 didn’t exist there’d be no 225 
Because people will fucking riot if they spend hours making a livery on their AN124 only to spend 1.3 mil WP on an AN225 Kit, lose their AN124, and also lose their livery because it can’t transfer over

If it doesn't use it during construction then the 124 should NOT be required
(It’s based on AN124 design)

Else other aircraft need to be fit to this same policy
Not enough reasoning
737 max 8 should be convertible from 737-800 then
Dawg
not the same circumstance
thats like saying that 737-200 should have the same uv as 737 max 8
Oh?
the AN225 was developed from the AN124
Not as a new platform
Oh my goodness then the 124 shouldn't be included
Erm don’t you mean 124
Bud he just said not as a new platform
This “realism” reasoning behind suggestion makes sense, but there’s little other benefit besides that
It’s not a converted aircraft from a preexisting one, it’s based on it, kinda like say
The 727 and 737
This
While yea the AN-225 was developed from the AN-124, it was never in the first place an AN-124
IT'S NOT A CONVERSION
Same goes for the foxglove
“Modifications on the 124 model”
Modification of a design, not an airframe

Yeah, but they didn’t take an AN-124 and turn it into an AN-225
The foxglove is currently like this ingame and has a similar situation.
It was not created from a 1.44 Flatpack, but the design is a modification of the 1.44 Flatpack. The 1.42 Foxglove requires a 1.44 Flatpack to be crafted.
They took the design and went “hey let’s make this longer, bigger wings, more engines, different stabilizers, etc blah blah blah”
Or the SU-75

True
yeah I’ll change the tags
Life please don’t lock we’re having a very super cool and serious discussion
I'll gladly write something against this :3
you do that

My main issue with this suggestion is that the parts for the AN-225 are already so rare, adding a blue rare that costs 150k is a bit of a
Not nice thing
the same thing as with an-124 and an-225
Exaaactly
But on the other hand

Let’s be fr
it makes sense but also inflation go brrrr
those have different config

Who has an AN-225 who still uses the AN-124
Yea I’m using it as an example
me
124 can Supply drop 
The designs are completely different
Yeah so do I, half the time I’m too poor to refuel the 225
One has 3 engines one has two
me
Airframe is different
The AN-124 has 4 engines, the 225 has 6

The AN-225 is longer, different tail
Different wing
An-225 is based on an-224 (never built) which is based on the an-124
did you make the plane @surreal leaf
Seems awfully similar to me!

Ok but the didn’t take the 727 and make the 737 from it
Or vice versa
They designed those planes alongside each other not as a derived variant

Exactly
So you can’t compare those to the 124 and 225
Ya but the 727 still came first

chill guy ain’t so chill now
I’m starting to slightly give a flip
A380 convertible from a340 then >:3

Chill out
chill guy turned into warm guy
The double fuselage A340 was a devplane at some point I think
That or it was modeled, just never added
make airbus a380 a 747 conversion
peppa pig but a dog? 
💀
That was NOT chill
Or tu-144d as convertible from tu-144s (depending which came first)
🔒
Eh
This is off topic at this point honestly
let’s delete the 225
If the an-225 clearly uses the an-124 during construction then this makes sense but so far I cannot confirm or deny that so it shouldn't require the 124 base
taking a educated guess it was likely built by modifying a partially built 124 airframe
Is there even proof to this?
“I had to go find out myself, so I booked the next flight to Kyiv and went to the headquarters of the Antonov Design Bureau.”
soon
anyways I’m still gonna implement this because
- the 225 feels too obtainable as of right now
- even if it was built from scratch it is still heavily based on the an-124


