#Remove X 1 and X 15 reverse thrust

41 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

primal carbon
#

They literally have rocket engines. Reverse thrust dont make no sense.

#

and other planes with rockets

gloomy axle
#

nah

#

there are a lot of aircraft in-game with reverse thrust that don't have it irl

#

coding a system to block reverse thrust from being applied would just be stupid and make the experience even worse while trying to land or slow down the aircraft

#

remember

#

aeronautica is not a realistic flight sim

main wigeon
#

@primal carbon play project flight or msfs

#

also im spooky now

bold hare
#

trying to go from mach 10 to like 190 knots will feel like a century

#

so no

dusk cobalt
#

Too bad the air brakes don’t work on the ground

gloomy axle
bold hare
#

a lot of fighter jets also don't have reverse thrust

dusk cobalt
#

Why shouldn’t we add this exactly

bold hare
dusk cobalt
#

No like for all planes that don’t have reverse thrust

#

It seems like a lot of them don’t

bold hare
dusk cobalt
bold hare
#

it's going to be more of a pain in the ass to fly than it already was

bold hare
#

not compared to planes with airbrakes obviously but like still

dusk cobalt
#

Make airbrakes work on the ground and get rid of reverse thrust on planes effected and this will be fine

dusk cobalt
#

It hardly makes a difference

fringe grove
#

this is a funny suggestion ngl

bold hare
#

ngl add spoilers

#

like yeah why not

#

dont even animate them or anything

fringe grove
#

cus most planes that don't have reverse suggestion HAS reverse thrust

dusk cobalt
bold hare
#

just have an indicator that spoilers are armed in the GUI and have it kind of maybe coded in

#

easy

dusk cobalt
#

Parachutes don’t even work

wanton mesa
#

Non-reverse-thrusting aircraft having it is mostly just to compensate for the lack of pushback tugs and such, most likely. It's a quality of life thing. Just pretend it's not reverse thrust, use your imagination.