#pypi-conda
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Hi
nice
Cool!
Ooh! I didn’t know there was a push to improve that!
Awesome!
I think with the coming variants, there’s somce complexity on the horizon that needs to be handled
not to speak of the existing complexity that isn’t handled yet i.e. solving PyPI and conda packages together: only Pixi does that to this day AFAIK
Hey @vernal kettle, one of the things that initiated the discussion at PyCon is conda got a new feature called conda-pypi, that offers a channel with all the Pure Python wheels on PyPI and allows conda to install them natively in a single solve: https://docs.conda.io/projects/conda/en/stable/new-features.html
hello all! It was great to meet at PyCon
Wow! conda-pypi even supportd mapping the just-introduced extras from CEP 44! https://conda.org/learn/ceps/cep-0044 https://conda.github.io/conda-pypi/developer/marker-conversion/#optional-dependency-extras
Title Optional dependency groups
Hey @vernal kettle, yup we were very involved with that standard and the conditionals one for this use case
Question about the CEP 44 match spec for extras: how do users specify multiple extras? I was reading it yesterday and it wasn't clear to me if you can write them comma-delimited, like in python-packaging-land.