#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 366 of 1
Hello!, how are you? It's a pleasure to meet you. I am intermediate/advanced in English, and I'd like to practice by a voice call. Who is available and free to practice?
hello
@meager basin Hello Curious_man
I am learning english and math and c language
becuse exam
Is he fighting the mice?
Ć
salam alykom
personally, I really can't forcibly turn myself on the ideas of preferring to have a positive opinions on the people of the world with slightly higher pigment on their epidermis that originated from the original human homes of the continent south of Europe named from The Roman referring to the other sides of Mediterranean sea called Africa.
ignore the context is this how British people speak?
is this an active claim , its started with personally ?
what's active claim
hhhh
h?
@void arch
Alykum Assalam
baraka Allah fikom
What is your age?
19 yrs old
Mashallah
?t
Which TV show do you want your life to be like?
Meh
Nah, they use the term 'mate,' "innit" and 'oy, chips and crumbits' a bit more often than this
So more like this: "Oy, mate, I just can't bring meself to fancy folks with a bit more pigment in their skin, y'know, the ones from Africa, like. It's just not my cup o' tea, innit?"
Hello @safe depot . Great, so we can assist to each other for that particular condition
How bizarre is British accent!
i want him to be our future president 
his story makes me sad, especially the mother
Western propoganda
you claim that no cruelty and blood shed happened in syria?
:((
he remained with the revolution till the endš those are the people that we're proud of
meit warde šøfor his brother and family, Allah yerhamon
Inshallah Syria will be prosperous under Al Jollani leadership
??
May Allah have mercy, Syrians really give alot sacrifice
Do you know about Mahmud Ghaznavid? his empire, attacks and history
nope
O morning breeze! Tell the door of the Kaaba,
The message of Muslim unity has arrived.
"Imperialism has ruined the world. It is high time that we, as Muslims, realize our strength and unite to counter its nefarious designs."
Quaid
imagine sleeping
You study PhD?
I used to
Does it give anything significant for personal growth?
Absolutely not
But it opens better job opportunities?
Depends on?
On your subject
Not at all
Picking up private subject
I don't believe that it has made me any more marketable
You are PHD in Aristotle
My doctorate is in philosophy
Actually, it depends on personality sometimes
lol
Philosophy can be orthodox and secular or only one
What
Yeah, Can philosophy be religious?
Why not?
Name one
Philosoohers
Yes
I read that philosophy can't be based on religion
Avicenna is the first pattern
Although he was also doctor
Or it maybe Nietzsche, i guess
Where are you from? Name a famous philosopher of your country
You can read all sorts of silly things
Your material maybe false
Philosophy can be based on religion
Do you know about Allama Iqbal?
Akhundzadah
Bakikhanov
Who is this?
He is a poet, Iqbals poetry is philophical.
Why do you argue bro?
In vain
I named to you several philosophers from my country or europe
Philosophy is about mostly moral things
And also religions' desire is to teach such things
I wanna discuss just.
Yes, it maybe some distinctions or even oppositions
Okay, let's discuss further
Why do you think like that? It's curious to me
I was judging religious orthodoxy on philosophy and someone pointed that philosophy is totally separate from religion
You say all philosophers are irreligious or anything else?
Probably, it was me
Are you also phd?
Though i'm not even christian, it came me so interesting
It was my teacher
Master
Your teacher said to you it can be like that?
Nice, Recommend me some books that are easy to understand its my hobby to read philosophy
Actually i red a few books
About philophy
But it was among them Epictetos, Socrates
They said philosophy is separate frim religion and can't be based on religion.
And also, Plato
Yes, it can be true
But you said totally different thing, i guess
Serious chat?
. Here
Guys where are you from?
Country: The world š„
I argued that philosophers can be religious, and philosophy can be debatable and based on religion. But the point is debates on religion or discussion on religion that's the point where lagging. It was eith teacher
Bikini Bottom
Aa, you didn't emphasize the country:)
Bro, you said can philosophers be religious?
And i said definitely they can
Ant then i even named
Several ones
Here
I am telling you about discussion with teacher and point where I am stuck or on doubt you can say
Okay, but why teacher did say like that? Any reason?
I want to learn about that topic
Further
Iqbal is a religious person also his poetry is about religion and philosophy, we were talking about him, he said don't take Iqbal a philosopher, philosophy can't be on religion as criticismon religion isn't a good thing, you can't criticize it.
Its the summary
But he didn't give any source or proof?
Iqbal is a philosopher according to my view, can you share your thoughts on Iqbal after reading him, if you got time
In class we don't have much time after that we didn't discuss it more, I will discuss with him tomorrow
Absolutely i can, but for that i need pretty much time
Because of my university exams
A, you say can i share now?
Sure
Okay, give me a little time
Okay
According to Britannica, he was philosopher and also, poet
But he was also leader
He is considered one of the most significant persons in pakistani history
Elevate your selfhood so high that before destiny is written,
God Himself asks, "What is it that you desire?
An individual has worth only in relation to the nation;
A wave exists in the river, but apart from it, it is nothing.
Is that a quote?
Thats his poetry some of it
He did gain also philosophy from Cambridge
And was barrister
So, it can prove he was philosopher as official
What a nerd
This is great part of poetry
Yeah, we concluded Iqbal a philosopher and Philosophy can based on religion
Is it for me?
no
"An individual has worth only in relation to the nation"
For me?
This is commonly known thing now
I love his poetry very much
Poet can also be philopher and religious
Look at Nitzsche
Some people say that he was mad
But he wasn't at all
Yes, he was criticizing Christianity
But it's not proof that he was irreligious
Nitzsche I heard about him
Nietzsche
He was one the most hated but at the same time genius philophers in the west
What vision was he giving? Ot what kind of philosopher he was
He was loving to criticize things that several people in germany or in europe accept normally
Ā«god is deadā thatās what said Nietzsche
He didnāt recognize any religion also
And he is the most famous atheist
Iāve read it
And the people killed him
As always
I don't think so
Why he should be atheist?
"You are an eagle,
Born to soar in the sky;
Why grovel in the dust,
When you have wings to fly?"
"This universe is still incomplete,
A constant process, a timeless feat.
Rise and act, for you are the flame,
The world awaits to know your name."
"Love is the flame,
That sets the soul alight;
Without it, man is but clay,
Wandering in endless night."
Fetter not yourself with chains of fate,
The power to change is yoursācreate!
The stars are paths, not boundaries to bind,
Rise, for you are the master of your mind
"Boundaries of nation and creed divide,
Yet under one God, we all abide.
Break these chains of selfish strife,
And embrace the oneness of life."
"Awake, for the night is no longer young,
The stars fade, and the dawn has sung.
The world awaits your guiding light,
Rise, O soul, and take your flight."
"Time is a fleeting shadow,
Eternity the glowing flame.
Live not in the past or future,
But in the now, where lies your aim."
"Man is not weak; he is the wielder of fate,
A maker of worlds, a force innate.
Dare to think, dare to create,
For you are a spark of the divine estate."
"Faith is a force that can break all chains,
A light that shines where darkness reigns.
It turns deserts into blooming fields,
And in battle, it becomes the shield.
"Set your sight on lofty dreams,
For life is more than what it seems.
A goalless life is but a wave,
Adrift in the sea, its course unpaved."
Check his quotes
Is he your favorite philosopher
Can you give any samples?
Special samples that really proves
Not at every condition
But he was also saying that
Islam is the greatest, i guess
Islam is the religious that is about all mankind
Did Neitszche said that
Nietzsche's praise of Islam as a 'jaāsagende semitische Religion', his admiration for Hafiz, his appreciation of Muslim Spain, his belief in the essentially lifeāaffirming character of Islam, not only spring from a desire to find a palatable Other to JudaeoāChristianāEuropean modernity, but also comment on how little ...
What do you think about it?
He never said that
I can not say he was definitely religious or irreligious
here we need to look more at the context he wasnt so much interested in Islam as he wanted to look at Europe differently
Maybe but in some quotes he appreciated this religion
He wanted more comprehensible religion
Nietzsche: He introduced the Ćbermensch as an ideal for humanity to aspire to. The Ćbermensch transcends conventional morality, rejecting traditional religious doctrines and embracing a life-affirming philosophy. Nietzsche believed that God is "dead" in the sense that modern society no longer relies on divine morality, necessitating a new set of values.
Iqbalās Response: Iqbal admired Nietzsche's call for self-realization and transcending mediocrity but rejected his atheism and dismissal of religion. Iqbal saw Khudi (selfhood) as a spiritual force rooted in God-consciousness. For Iqbal, the true "Superman" is not one who denies God but one who realizes their divine potential through submission to Godās will.
Iqbalās verse (on Nietzscheās Superman):
"The man of God is stronger than fate;
His fire melts the heavensā weight.
He creates worlds through his divine spark,
Illuminating all in the deepest dark."
Youāre totally wrong cuz thats about islam ig
I consider that's mistake to say totally wrong
Nope
In his last times he did speak as a real mad
No. He was just obsessed with the idea of āāthe superman also disappointed in God and wanted people to become the best version of themselves. Read his book "Thus Spoken Zarathustra" and youāll understand the whole essence of his teachings
@pastel barn
Iqbal explicitly addressed Nietzsche in his Persian poetry, particularly in Payam-e-Mashriq (Message of the East), written as a philosophical dialogue with Goethe and Nietzscheās works. Iqbal appreciated Nietzscheās genius but lamented his despair and atheism.
Iqbal on Nietzsche (from Payam-e-Mashriq):
"A seer who lost his way in the dark,
His soul cried out but missed the spark.
He sought God but found Him not,
For in his heart, faith was forgot
So?
Exactly what Iām talking about
Is there any philosopher you admire or recommend?
@mystic bay
Only fydor dostoveskey and Kafka
What kind of philosophy are you interested in?
philosophy of suffering?
Philosophy of Deep emotions
which lead to suffering
Don't you see about beatiful thoughts on special religion?
It should not lead to athiestic or secular view
Life is miserable buddy there's ntg spacial without suffering
Does it mean that he apply any religion? You can just read his biography and get the point what he was an atheist
Share or Dm your thoughts on Islam
The path of truth is arduous and steep,
Where faithās flame burns, the soul does leap.
"Man is the architect of his fate,
The stars bow down to those who create.
Do not despair in the darkest night,
For the dawn comes with the believerās light."
I know. iāve read Dostoevsky in russian language, so i know perfectly what he wrote about. But the philosophy of suffering, where any choice leads to the same thing - I don't like it
life loses its meaning in this case cuz any choice you make will lead you to suffering
With whom?
To me
Okay, now?
Islam doesn't need any kind of thoughts if someone makes critisism on it
And i think that, criticizm on any religion can imrove its perfection
If it's really excellent
I need their view pont and a discussion to know their hate is becauss of fake propaganda
What is your view on it?
But suffering is real thing bruhh ....if u ever obsess with it u u never ever comes out from that
I have doubts on any monotheist religion
Why?
What are they?
I would like to research about Islam, Christianity and also Judaism
And what about who still wouldn't understand if we eloborate everything about religion?
Further
Actually, there are several things
tbh few philosophers ive read put religion in a good light. Try Plato, Aristotle or Kant (although Kant was rational he also said that faith is important for moral development)
Heart problems, they have eyes and ear
I can not comprehend your sentence
Will you recommend me some books ?
Those ppl who haven't want to understand and accept about any religion so ? What do u suppose to them ?
gimme a sec
Bro why are you so aggressive?:)
We are just arguing
Their Hearts are sealed actually wHat can we do the m if they don't want to understand
I would be happy if Muhammad shares his ideas
?
@balmy folio i also do live in country which population is mainly muslims
Ok man sry ...
And my older descendants were also muslims
It's okay man
Now
I will read them
Where do u live ?
Azerbaijan
Share them
Which is totally secular country
Previously it's about evolution and religion
I understand
Good luck with it
There maybe evolution by God
And also by nothing or nobody
Just evaluate to higher levels with only knowledge
Good idea, I'm researching on it also
And then several people would like to not trust someone or
Or live under someone's power
And to manage them
There would be special idea
Islam gave that idea already
How to manage those people who are under my control?
To create religion, to create scare?
How?
But it must be something special like nobody can argue it
Or nobody can share about it
Or not criticize, just to worship it
You can discuss about it
You can think about it, why you have to follow blindly
Think why hadith have this what is its commandment, why is it said
This force you to reason its good
Oh, man! How many people do just worship without investigation
Not everyone can do everything everyone don't worship too
That's why it's predominantly 96% population muslim country
But it is useful for now also, not?
Minority of muslims do investigate
Thunking is part of Islam
But most the people who really research about it they switch their religion,
Islam's first word is READ
But do afghans really read?
Most*
Imam Jaffar Sadiq, Imam Abu Hanifa
There are others too
I'm going to research about them
We can do together if you want
It would be good, but it would be another day
Sure
Aristotle, naturally
Even though he is not the easiest to read
(although he is worth learning Greek for)
Good joke
Such a developed state in one of the SSRs
Howās in there
Have you enjoyed under that oil field in your capital
Vietnam when their national football team wins the match
It was quite like a big riot.
Did they shoot fireworks?
They shot something like a flare.
I miss flare
Theyāre summoning more dps
ded
š¤”
Yeah u r right
Hi there, I'm ismael from Morocco exactly in Casablanca, I'm a web developer, I want to make friends (who know to code) and improve my English thank you.
He introduced a new way of debating, a hybrid debating with AI, something innovative ofc
I am looking for a U.S. friend
Hey Ismael
@meager basin
"Islam is not just a religion of rituals and prayers; it is a complete way of life. It addresses the individual and the collective, the spiritual and the material, guiding Muslims in all aspects of their existence."
Hi š
Yes, but we have developed primarily thanks to oil over decades.
Almost the same situation like the other eastern european post-soviet states
Quote is great, i wish all the muslims behave according to that rule
"That knowledge is no knowledge, O wine-cup,
Which teaches the secrets of slavery and strips away originality."
they will
If they would act like this, Islamic world would be totally different..
I agree
That's enigma man. Human is so interesting, so who can know what is going to happen due to humanous behaviour
yeah

@balmy folio Do you consider Islam to be a political religion?
There is a political Islam
What are your thoughts on it?
Political Islam is different from I SI s or terrorism
Thats a view point of scholar
I don't have a view on it. I was just wondering if the Quran dictates a certain political philosophy or an approach to violence.
Islam is a way of life, not politics or something
I will ask and tell you about it
Ok
Sometimes this "way of life" can also influence politics, don't you think?
This is the reason why most Muslim states are not secular
My understanding is that Islam had a 'militant' dimension since the beginning, even during Muhammed's own lifetime
Generally terrorism is haram
Blowing yourself up is haram
Killing innocent haram
And there are also rules for war
We can't kill womens, unarmed, innocent, monks, elders and kids
We can't cut trees
We can't burn anything
We can't steal
We can't betray
We have to treat prisoners well as we treat orphans and poor
We can't play with the dead body
@mystic bay
Judaism is like that too, the Messiah is supposed to be a political figure. To Samaritans he is a warrior of sort too
It was a monotheist revival movement
There are proofs from the Quran and Hadith for that if you want @mystic bay
"generally terrorism is haram" it isn't at times?
?
"Generally" means "most of the times/on average" this implies that there are exceptions
I didn't mean that
It's my bad English

It seems just common sense, nothing special, it should be the normality for all people
I don't see anyone doing it
Except us
What do you mean by us in modern era?
Who follow Islam (they aren't the most )
Let's say believers only
I was asking for spesific organisation or country
Not all Muslims
Normality eh? Don't you belong to the land of Roman Empire 
Normality outside our great Roman empire
With the new consuls we are making progress
We are about to abolish slavery
Apparently Romans were better at treating slaves than other empires
I didn't see any Europe country doing good things in war like what Islam said
War is war
But you said it's normal
Even Islamic countries haven't done good things in war
Everyone committed atrocities
Islam is no exception
Then search
I said "it should be the normality"
.
I'm just saying that what you said means it's not something special
Hi guys
Hi
hi
hello
doesn't matter, if u can leave peacefully that's all
lmao
Good morning, I have a question for you regarding whether there are any more help people here, if you could recommend me some free to play games from Steam because I'm looking for multiplayer games to randomly select players from the genres mmo rpg, otawert world schootery etc.: practically all of them except farming, but not cs ,valorant,fortntie League of legends I played the well-known ones and got bored of them, can someone more knowledgeable give me some advice or advise me to look at them differently? when there will be sales of cheap games on Steam and then buy that particular game
albion online is a good game
you can try black desert as well
Umm why you not waited for fc25 discount?
and something else but cs, valorant, league of legends, fortnite, etc.: would you advise waiting for game promotions when there are sales on steam and then buy something more interesting because you don't have many free to play multiplayer games in your library, that randomness will choose someone
and something else but cs, valorant, league of legends, fortnite, etc.: would you advise waiting for game promotions when there are sales on steam and then buy something more interesting because you don't have many free to play multiplayer games in your library, that randomness will choose someone
Alright alright
you meant NOT cs valorant etc?
I have this game and game 5, Battlefield, the new part, what would you advise me to do now, because in January there will be various discount game festivals on Steam, I should hunt for them
Hei guys, if some of you guys in this server are korean can you guys tell me what hapoened with the K Netz?
Because i heard in many many news that the Knetz curse the stewardess because they "safe" from Jeju air accident?
I meant Valorant, CS, League of Legends, Fortnite, I was playing these games, I got bored, I lost a lot
you might try marvel rivals
or just get better at the games
and you're good at this Marvel Rivals game, and you don't have enough free to play games on Steam in your library, exactly for my preferences, multiplayer, that it will match me with someone to play with, as I mentioned, would you advise me to buy the games on a discount promotion, I write well
i think i am misunderstanding you
and you're good at this Marvel Rivals game, and you don't have enough free to play games on Steam in your library, exactly for my preferences, multiplayer, that it will match me with someone to play with, as I mentioned, would you advise me to buy the games on a discount promotion, I write well
because I need a multiplayer game to randomly select players, but not the games I mentioned and asked if you have this new Marvel game and if many people play it on Steam
marvel rivals is #3 by online on steam right now
is it good, do you play it, is it multiplayer and will it match my preferences, does it have any other games in it, can you suggest me any other games or if you look at your Steam game library you have, do you have most of the paid games?
yeah its good
yes i play it
yes its multiplayer
it might match your preferences
my steam library is mostly paid games
heya
and for free, but when game sales get closer, would you advise me to buy specific games from Steam because January, February 2025 and the following months will be the festival
yes marvel rivals is free
i dont really know any paid games that you might like
because if promotions for games will be organized at festivals, as I mentioned in January, February 2025, would you advise taking advantage of them? Now there will be a festival of strategic games, there I will find multiplayer games tailored to my preferences. I will write and ask how old you are, because I am thirty and I am a good person?
what do you mean by promotions
sales?
but you have some paid ones, you couldn't check your Steam library, unless you have multiplayer
discounts on games on steam that are reduced
tell me how old you are because I said so?
my games would not match your preferences
tell me how old you are because I said so?
why would you want to know
alep, you suggested marvel rivlas one game for me on steam
yes i did
because I said you are younger than me, I am cultured
yes i am younger, i think you need to improve your english a bit
I'll just say it and I can see that you're nice non Toxic
I know English well, better than you, but you offered me the chance to play Marvel Rivals on Steam, it's free on PC, but when I start playing it, I have to choose the singleplayer mode, will the server immediately match it to me, and what is an open-source MMO RPG game? The world, as I mentioned, or the atmosphere of Diablo 4, etc.:
yes
I wrote to you, reply me
i think you wanted multiplayer games
marvel rivals has only multiplayer
Islam itself have principles for poltical system
The First Geneva Convention, officially the Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field (French: Convention pour l'amƩlioration du sort des blessƩs et des malades dans les forces armƩes en campagne), held on 22 August 1864, is the first of four treaties of the Geneva Conventions. It defines "the basis o...
When Jesus A.S will be back he will also fight a war
Source?
Hey mates, Could you send me a record voice for pronunciation of "750 English Oak Dr, Hinesville, Liberty, GA, United States". It should be American Native pronunciation. Thanks.
According to Quran and Hadith, Quran and Hadith don't command to kill innocents people, even if you have to go to war you have to warn them then war will start, you cannot even hide and attack before announcing war
Hi everyone , I am good at python and dsa , I am looking for someone who is fluent in english , I can teach python and dsa and return you can teach me english , it would be like a skills exchange , if anyone interested please dm e
now a days you can also ask aiš¤§
So it's fine to start a war as long as you warn the invaded country
AI sucks
lol, then don't ever use any sort of ai
I won't
you have to give them warning and options first negeotiate if they want to attack dont surrender then fight
Doesn't this make it justified to take land from a weaker country as long as they are forced to negotiate though? Imagine if Austria declared war on Liechtenstein, a nation the size of a town. How are they going to get a fair peace treaty?
Muslims can attack if their govt is cruel, not giving rights to citizens, if the nation call for help, Muslims cant attack for money, land and any other benifits, if they do thats their personal will not part of Islam its not justified.
Also if they surrender, they will not be hurt not a single citizen they will live by Islamic laws
Where is that said
There are political principles
Don't Islamic laws force people to pay extra taxes if they are not Muslims, and they cannot participate in politics and the military
I think its not psrt of the islamic law,
If we bacj to that time, the taxes that the non moslem must pay to us, is the country who got taken by islamic country
This is why nowadays European countries like Albania and Bosnia Herzegovina are Muslim majority
Prohibition of Aggression: Muslims are commanded not to be aggressors. Fighting is only permissible in defense or against oppression.
Quran 2:190:
"Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress. Indeed, Allah does not like transgressors."
Protection of Non-Combatants: The Prophet Muhammad (ļ·ŗ) forbade harming women, children, the elderly, and non-combatants.
Hadith (Bukhari, 3015):
"Do not kill women or children or non-combatants."
When enemies seek peace or surrender, fighting must cease.
Quran 8:61:
And if they incline to peace, then incline to it and rely upon Allah."
Kindness to Captives: The Prophet treated captives with dignity and encouraged their humane treatment.
Quran 76:8-9:
"And they give food in spite of love for it to the needy, the orphan, and the captive, [saying], 'We feed you only for the countenance of Allah. We wish not from you reward or gratitude.'"
Ransom or Release: Captives could be freed through ransom or goodwill.
Quran 47:4:
"Then, either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens."
They didn't want to pay taxes
After the conquest of Mecca, the Prophet forgave his former enemies who surrendered.
Hadith (Ibn Hisham, Seerah):
"Go, for you are free."
Fair Treatment: In the Battle of Badr, prisoners were treated kindly and were offered food equal to what Muslims ate.
Seerah Reference:
"Treat the prisoners well." (Musnad Ahmad 22241)
Non Muslims pay Jizya and Muslims Zakat, if govt need money then the richers from both community pay tax not poor, the tax are equal
In the case of Bosnia it's kind of complicated, it was also the fault of Christians (both Orthodox and Catholics) because they saw the Bosnian church as heretical
But yes, it often was done in order to achieve more power, in fact the second largest ethnicity of rulers in the Ottoman Empire was Albanian right after Turkish
It's also because Ottomans mostly kidnapped and enslaved Christians in Europe
No they didn
Excuse me, where you find this issue?
Islamic law historically required non-Muslims under Muslim rule to pay jizya (a tax) in exchange for protection and exemption from military service, as noted in Quran 9:29. However, they retained religious freedom and could participate in certain aspects of governance depending on the context. This system was not a blanket oppression but a reciprocal arrangement common
Literalry there is no clue the moslem goverment back then enskaved the christisn
Lmfao yes they did, it literally is medieval European history. Christians did the same, they enslaved Muslims and then both Muslims and Christians traded happily together in Crimea
Janissaries? What are those? Devshirme?
It is like war hostages trader?
Nope, they were slaves to work in camps or to serve the nobility, sometimes to serve in wars as cannon fodder or slave soldiers
"kidnapping and enslaving Christians" is oversimplified and ignores historical context. The devshirme system, was a levy of children for state service, where they were educated, trained, and rose to prominent positionsāsome even becoming grand viziers.
The Black Sea slave trade trafficked people across the Black Sea from Eastern Europe and the Caucasus to slavery in the Mediterranean and the Middle East. The Black Sea slave trade was a center of the slave trade between Europe and the rest of the world from antiquity until the 19th century. One of the major and most significant slave trades of ...
Non-Muslims held significant roles in Ottoman administration, including diplomacy and commerce.
Jews expelled from Spain in 1492 were welcomed into the Ottoman Empire and given safe haven.
Ottoman courts ensured that Christians and Jews could seek justice under Islamic law, which recognized their religious and civil rights.
After being kidnapped from their families... Right. Imagine if I started human trafficking in a poor, war thorn country but it's all fine because I am selling those children to wealthy families where they won't suffer
Your comparison is flawed of historical context. The devshirme system wasn't "human trafficking" but a state recruitment policy where children were trained, educated, and given opportunities to rise to the highest ranks of power far removed from exploitation. Many families voluntarily offered their children for better prospects, and some of these children became prominent leaders like Grand Vizier Sokollu Mehmed Pasha. Unlike European practices of colonization and slavery, which **dehumanized and brutalized **millions, the Ottoman system integrated people into society and governance. If youāre calling this "trafficking," you should examine your own history first.
My history? Ottomans literally galloped all the way from the Pontic steppes to my country (when it didn't even exist yet) to kidnap poor villagers that had no way to defend themselves
https://mikedashhistory.com/2015/01/15/blonde-cargoes-finnish-children-in-the-slave-markets-of-medieval-crimea/
Canadian PM is giving resignation speech rn
Blaming the Ottomans for the Crimean slave trade shows ignorance of history it was the Crimean Tatars, semi-autonomous vassals, who conducted these raids, not Ottoman policy. The devshirme system, though controversial, was a state recruitment process that educated and elevated individuals, not enslavement.
Welcome to 2025
God and Allah being gracefully asleep while his followers are being friendly and cooperative for once
2025 is having a good start
Meanwhile, European powers actively enslaved** millions **across continents through brutal transatlantic trade far more devastating than isolated raids. Before criticizing, perhaps review the centuries of European exploitation that shaped global suffering far more than the policies of one empire
I wonder who traded in Crimea? And what's the religion of Crimean Tatars...?
something something barbery pirates
something something slaves
Yeah IDF soldier leaving brazil to not get arrested on committing war crimes was my fav so far
The Turkish Abductions (Icelandic: TyrkjarĆ”niư [ĖtʰɪrĢ„caĖrauĖnÉŖĪø]) were a series of slave raids by pirates from Algier and SalĆ© that took place in Iceland in the summer of 1627.
The adjectival label "Turkish" (Icelandic: Tyrkja) does not refer to ethnic Turks, country of Turkey or Turkic peoples in general; at the time it was a general term for ...
Blud was on vacation
what war crimes ?
The Crimean Tatars were Muslim, but their actions were driven by local power dynamics and profit, not Islamic teachings, Prophet Teachings or direct Ottoman orders. If youāre so eager to tie religion to every crime, letās discuss how Christian European empires enslaved millions under explicitly Christian monarchies.
Yes they did, so did Muslims
Now what's your line of defence?
Irrelevant
Muslims not Islam. but your actions were justified by the religion
The whole point was: religion isn't even important when it comes to these actions, because it never was against slavery and it never reformed or incentivised these people to stop slavery
That just proves religion is just violent af
"Christians not Christianity"
Yeah Chrisitanity actually
"Participating in massive demolition of civilian homes in Gaza"
That was the quote
And Islam and Judaism
"Christianity endorses slavery, but Islam doesn't. Only Muslims practiced it but it wasn't endorsed by Islam"
Jews actions aren;t by judaisim
Bud, Israelā¦
What's up here guyzzzz
they are zionist there are many jews that condemend that
Can I also rub my tail here
no
All religions have been violent, the Middle East is the birthplace of all major world religions, and, not coincidentally, is one of the areas where most of the wars and battles have occurred
Both Christianity and Islam existed in societies where slavery was a norm, but Islam regulated and encouraged abolition through manumission, while European powers institutionalized racial slavery for profit. Ignoring Islam's reforms while defending Europe's atrocities exposes your biased narrative.
I wonder if whatever the Australian aborigines believe in is violent or not, don't they just get high and have dreams on weird stuff and the beginning of existence
Religions are frequently misused. Comparing all religions as equally violent ignores the nuances of how faith has also driven peace, charity, and social justice throughout history.
How come they were the last countries to abolish slavery then? While Christian countries were the first ones
Muslim majority and Buddhist majority countries were the last to abolish slavery and indentured servitude
Afghanistan is a great example of social justice
Also yes point out where I defended "Europe's" atrocities when I literally stated that Christians and Muslims were fine happily trading slaves together in Crimea
Saudis didn't even wanted to get rid of slavery
"Uh but you see, Europe bad and Christians bad, don't you agree?"
Yes, what now?
"Uh... Ehm... You are defending Europe"
Afghanistan's situation today is the result of decades of conflict, foreign intervention, and political instability, not a reflection of Islamic social justice principles.
Social justice is a universal principle, not confined to one country or religion.
Lol slavery was never related to relegion
It's all the white man's fault, as always
I'm pretty sure that he is an AI recycling the same sentences and didn't expect my reaction
any doubt
But you see, they could have adopted a more liberal political and economic system, which would have benefited their population, while they chose to follow the most extreme interpretations of Islam
Even Europe, destroyed after the Second World War, could have chosen a similar path, but we used common sense
so
Everyone around the globe was committing atrocities, white folks were just little good at it
Not even most of them, just few
Yeah few were exceptionally good
Most of them were living under empires, either European or not, where most people may not have been even represented like Finns not being able to use their language to participate in any institution until the late 19th century
Ultimately it is their collective imagination of the Western world, they will say all the same thing
If you didn't speak Swedish you had no ground to make any request to the local administration, let alone the central one in Sweden
Well, yes, I admit it, it's true
Btw if you want to beat AI, argue about LGBT
This method works every single time
Yes, they can think whatever, my country was an agrarian shithole and it improved in the past century, meanwhile they can live in the delusions of their past being so great and progressive
I can't wait for AIs to use the lizard argument
History teaches us that the strength of a nation is not in its wealth or military,
But in its ability to stay true to its values and spiritual vision.
~Iqbal
Second country to give universal voting rights š š» first in Europe
Any example of poor strong nation?
The history of the Muslims is a mirror of their own souls,
If they have the vision, they can reshape their fate with their will.
~Iqbal
One of the first countries to institute social welfare and worker unions, social democracy (not ideal but better than most systems)
China communist party is better than democracy in Europe
Then they will say that your country got rich through colonialism (Finland never had colonies, but has been repeatedly conquered by Sweden, Russia and Denmark to a lesser extent)
Is this why the rich Chinese kids study and live in the West?
Blud started quoting urdu poet š
China is great but uh they prefer Switzerland and USA I guess
We were a colony for like 200-300 years š
We only fully decolonised because the Russian Empire mistakenly funded the Finnboos amongst the Swedish nobility not predicting that they'd still try and achieve independence
How?
Allah says so
Muslim saying china is better than europe is mad
The Uyghurs agree
Even Minecraft would agree
I believe Europe is decades ahead of USA in terms of social values [i don't have any source, it's bro-science]
There are things that I envy from Eastern Europe even if it's deemed less developed than Western Europe
Yes and no, I still believe in the American dream
Besides Spain, most Eastern European countries treat their minorities better than Western European countries do
Then you should know my father to see the greatness of European social values
Even Serbia despite hating Albanians isn't bad to the Rusyns
USA,
Scandinavia is too cold.
But I like both because the tall handsome guys in Scandinavia
Nooo Switzerland, it's in Central/Western Europe. Sweden is the Scandinavian one
Ohš¤£
There aren't many Chinese immigrants in Switzerland because immigrating there is extremely difficult to anyone that isn't a Schengen citizen
It's also tiny compared to Japan and USA
Sigh, countries like France is being occupied by black people
Now even a Bulgarian could easily emigrate to Switzerland
True, we really overcame all barriers in 2025
Besides Ireland of course, they don't like Schengen
Since Romania joined the Schengen area I keep my wallet safe
Get ready to see news like these
Only the Balkans will understand
Another thing is that Europe doesn't speak much English.
Those Scandinavian guys make me drool all the time.
š¤Ø
It's scam
It's mad funny
Honestly same with Baltic guys to me but some of them look like the ninja turtles
Baltic? Arab?
Baltics are pretty white
No, Baltic countries (tiny countries in northeastern Europe)
Like Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia
Sup dead chat
Must be pakistani eh, after getting loans from china
Getting loans while getting your women bought up by some Chinese billionaire
Estonia is arab of Europe btw
Malta: sigh
Guys I heard , china invented a new virus again
What, when
I just heard it from the news just 2 hrs ago
Oh yea, that's been going on for months - Have they only begun reporting on it now?
I heard about this shit like last year
Tbh if I was a woman I would sell myself to a Chinese billionaire, there's nothing wrong in it
Can't work my whole life to pay stupid bills
Are they old and decrepit tho
Well, it's the parents taking a few bucks and giving their daughters to the chinese billionaires
Even better
They'll probably have a better life
No clue - Just know it happens
Speedrun
What's your views on it
Based on your morality

That is Spain or Southern Italy
Aight lemme read it
Doesn't sound like a better life tbh
Waiting for France to get added
At this point let's add Germany and the UK too
Even Sweden
No way, Germany is West Turkestan, UK is Northwest South Asia
That's really sad, they often sell em in china on pretext of marriage
For prostituition
Yea. It's not a surprise, just sad
That makes sense now
Otherwise I was shocked to see this woman getting married to a chinese billionaire, they're really racist most of the times
I don't know how to say it more politely 
It's okay, just a boy
Na i don't think so, European countries have a really great education system which promotes rationality
Yeah, but Malmƶ is pretty Arab now
What's that
Just googled it, it has 25-30% muslim population
Eventually new gen will become agnostic/ atheist
Religion weights a lot higher among arabs in europe than arabs in the middle east
It's difficult when Sweden dumped all of them in the same blocks
When I was there, in a skatepark there were only, I think, two Swedish guys from what I noticed. The new generations will be more and more Muslim going forward
In France it's the opposite, they are more spread out and you can see the results: they really turn to atheism, some even to Christianity (granted it's very few like 6% of them but still crazy)
I recall seeing 30-40% of them being atheists
Christian groups should be taken with a grain of salt - It's because it grants them cultural immunities; in Sweden you had a person larping as a christian after doing a crime to be given less weight by the jury
I just can't see any religion surviving this era without reforms
Can this really happen in Sweden? If so , it's delusional
Sweden is delusional - It's an old case, 2015
Idk about using religion but you can plead to insanity
Some believe their religion is the same as it was at the time of creation
But it's not true
No way lol, poor Sweden
Lmao yeah I've seen more progressive muslims from iran than south asia
I've known a lot of Iranians - Iranians tend to be very progressive in Europe; like,their "Islam" is just feeling, then they go around having s*xual relationships with white dudes and drinking alcohol
It's unavoidable, they'll reform the religion or it'll disappear
Arabs and Turks are bit more fundamental in their religiousity here
at least from my experience
Goddammmmit I've high hopes
Well shias in general are more progressive
Tend to be more agnostic too - It's probably to do with the strictness of the religion in Iran's government; sort of like a catholic-girl raised in catholic school type situation
Turkey sent their worst, maybe the Arab countries did too
Many Turks in Europe are minorities that live isolated from Turkish society already, or they are from the East where they are more conservative
I mean it makes sense, why would Turkey send the people that contribute the most to Germany when they could depopulate the least developed regions of the country
Depends. I've had good relationships with some Turkish girls. Though, Turks can be very progressive here too. Though, I mostly know those of middle income background; so religion is only relevant for some of them here
Aren't Turks with good educational backgrounds usually the ones who immigrate to Europe?
I don't know, not in my experience, even according to Turks from Turkey they usually aren't
But they are still less attached to their background than most immigrants
For example, in Germany, if you don't have a good education, you have no hope of finding a lucrative job
Germany needed a lot of unskilled workers as well, wasn't that the whole point of making their immigration easier?
Most of those we got here were construction workers and low skilled jobs, so not really
Now the economic situation in Germany is quite different, it is no longer the Merkel era, the Merkelreich is over. The economic recession has begun, the auto industry has cut some jobs and many have to resort to private agencies to have a full pension. If you come to Germany without even a degree, it's over for you
It's also one of the reasons why the far right leads the polls
Don't know how much it matter if you're Turkish - The discussion isn't about Turkey, but foreign workers who are of Turkish background
Here we have the kebab sellers, mostly
But I think that the next immigrant generation has more skills
Where in Turkey are you from anyways?
Because advanced economies demand nore skills today
I just wrote randomly, didn't see the messages above
Ooh, that's nice - I've always wanted to visit Istanbul again
Again, I just wrote it randomly
Lmao - Jumping from continent to continent š«”
Mr. Worldwide
I mean - Istanbul is a trans-continental city
So what you studying anywho?
Oh god - Condolences š
Knock Knock
Thatās cool
Whoās there
Oh that was my minor
The Undertaker'
Whatās your major
Respect them - It just sounds like pain
Electrical engineering
Sounds cool 2
Howād someone like mathematics!!!!!!!! I donāt understand
Mashallah
šāāļø
You don't - Just torture yourself
Pathogoryean spotted
Easy
It's a school of Greek mathematics that thought everything was made of numbers
Physics is weak spot, mathematics is kinda strong
Do you know anyone who looks sexy and studies math?
i'm in mathematics with cs
Debatable. I'm not too well-versed in Aristotle, but our local Aristotlean might go into the criticism he had of the subject
where are you from? @elder seal
Denmark
its not my majore
Without mathematics i can't be a good engineer
I'm trying to have a strong grip on it
I'm familiar - though not too familiar with Aristotle's critique
Pakistan
"Mathematics measures the visible and finite,
But the infinite realm of the soul is beyond its light."
They also thought that positive things were connected to odd numbers and negative things to even numbers, it's just a schizo yap
All this because they represented numbers with pebbles or shi
I mean - Within the context of the time, it made sense. Even today it's a fairly common belief among mathematicians given everything fundamentally is related through some quantity
oh nice
Yes, but on these assumptions they behaved like a sect
Aristotle's chief argument was that the numbers are 'abstracted away' from reality; so it's not that reality is made up of numbers, but numbers refered through reality
Depends on the group. The Mathematician group was less religious than tthe fundamentalists
The worst is Plato
Don't know why he's 'the worst'
Even if he is not a Pythagorean
I quite like Plato
I don't know, he believes in innate ideas, it's a thought very far from my logic
I won't say it doesn't make sense, it's just not close to my way of thinking
The idea is merely that everything that exist persist through forms; so this tree, and that tree, are both 'trees' presupposing a transcendental form of the tree.
Not really - Only in my own field of sociology; political science; political economy and recently gotten myself into metaphysics
Only mathematics I'm familiar with is statistics
Aristotle's critique of these is that trees are merely abstracted away from properties shared between two particulars; so the form is merely an object of similarity and distinction. A recent countercritique is Frege's idea of transcendental abstract object-class; specifically that if we deprive physical and mental properties from reality, is it true that ther's neither of those; if yes, we've already presupposed a transcendental property
Ok, I agree, but this is the collective imagination of tree. I remember when my teacher told my classmate to draw a house on the blackboard and then said that that representation was similar to the others she asked in the past, that's just collective imagination, we aren't born with an idea of what a tree is or what a house looks like
Everything we know is given by experiences
That's a strawman of the theory of forms, and probably because your teacher conflates the term "idea" with a mental object
The term 'abstract object' or 'idea' here is merely a non-physical and non-mental object
She's a bad teacher btw
She tries to give practical examples because hopefully they will be more understandable
But this discredits all the abstraction that can be behind great reasoning
This is why I don't believe in innate ideas, after all
The reasoning given by Plato was that of identity; a tree is a tree, a drawing of a tree is a tree, hence, we're presuppsoing something that's "just a tree" or a "perfect tree" - A critique herein is often given to Aristotle, though is derivative of Plato's "parmenides," that if a tree is a tree, then is that tree a tree, so is there another perfect tree before it? And so into infinity; the third man argument as it's called.
It's debatable how strong it is through, a lot of countercriticism arose through the 20th century
Counter criticism is that 'this tree' is not 'that tree' but they're both 'trees' so that assumes something that's "just a tree," we don't necessarily need a '3rd man' because the two first trees are objects of participation; while the 'form of the tree' is one of identity
Could you recommend me a good book on this?
A better example is the form of the good; if we say something is Good, we assume it partakes of Goodness; which assumes Goodness-as-such. But is the form of the Good, Good? Third man argument willsay if we accept, it must reduce it to an infinite regress. But Wittgenstein criticized the third man argument here, as he argued it conflates adjective with identity; the form of the good isn't "good," but the good. It bears the identity of goodness and is identical to itself, but does not partake of itself
I can recommend a study. https://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/VlastosTMA.pdf
Thanks bro
He specifically unbundles the argument into several logics, and then notes that the third man argument isn't even warranted
Can't log in, I'll try again later
I mean; true! - In philosophy that's like a week ago š
a lot of high profile philosophers are like 100s of years old
Most recent philosophers I'm familiar with is R. Scruton who died in 2020 and Grant Maxwell who's latest publishing is 2022 - as in books
so granted, depends on your interest area
A book I often recommend to people is Scruton's "sexual desire," if you're interest in ethics, ontology and the sort @mystic bay
You can scroll down - They're not really 'marrying,' they're promising marriage and gives money, and then prostitute the girls out to make money
It comes from the girls themselves - Some being found half-dead
Right, 600 women lied about it - I don't know what 'wrong information' you're talking about, one of them died with clear signs of malnourishment and sa after having being sold off to a Chinese man a few years after
Can you type their names?
This is disingenuous.
This is a report of around 600 women
They were of rich backhgrounds to be able to afford them.
Why's that relevant?
You do realize they're not named due to defamation laws
It's an entirely irrelevant question to begin with
I can give you one example:
In this May 22, 2019 photo, Sumaira a Pakistani woman, shows a picture of her Chinese husband in Gujranwala, Pakistan. Sumaira, who didn't want her full name used, was raped repeatedly by Chinese men at a house in Islamabad where she was brought to stay after her brothers arranged her marriage to an older Chinese man.
if you think rich people have some special innate characteristics that means they don't do this, sure
Pakistan became a focus of Chinese marriage brokers last year and activists say that since then as many as 1,000 women and girls have been married off to Chinese men. Most of the women are from Pakistan's small Christian community, who are among the country's most desperately poor.** Brokers offer families cash to give their daughters as brides, promising them well-off Chinese husbands who would give them a good life.**
The point is that they're sold off to chinese men under the promise of payment and forced into prostitution - their income is entirely trivial.
Many of these men are portrayed as rich and millionaires; many of them are merely a part of a larger trafficking network.

Again - Trivial information.
Okay, and?
Why's this relevant to the subject matter?
Sounds gross
I mean - It's a conservative piece, it's not like a condonoment of anything, merely an analysis of the subject through the lens of Kantian ethics and metaphysics; specifically Husserl's phenomenology
His chief argument is a distinction between embodiment and intentional embodiment - So that, a person is both their body and in their body; for Scruton the latter case is an object of desire for a person, while desire in terms of the body is brought up through substitution; I might desire your body, but not you, hence, I regard you merely as an object that is replaceable between people of similar characteristics
The book's fairly decent, honestly. Most critiques I found to be unsatisfactory; only one I found decent is 'I might desire their pleasure,' but then it invites the question "Do I desire their pleasure because it's them or because I merely desire the pleasure of some abstracted person?"
Because if the latter, we're still merely desiring the pleasure of some abstraction; they're merely a tool towards that end
Gross
Just fyi as well - The reason why she probably thought the Platonic ideas are ideas in terms of mental properties is because the term "idealism" also means everything is made of mental properties; the issue with the terms is it's often-time not really about mental properties, but a tertiary sphere determining the mental-and-physical sphere; often known as 'the ground' or 'God' or 'Absolute.' That's at least true for Absolute-idealism and Platonic "idealism" (realism); transcendental idealism acknowledges both subject-and-object, but notes that subjects can only ascertain objects as they appear to us
The falcon never falls from the fatigue of its flight,
If you have resolve, no danger can harm your love for the cause.
@mystic bay
There are some rules for rulers which they have to abide in Islam
š¤Ø
lifeās worth is not found in blind imitation of Western philosophies,
The path lies in nurturing the heart and spirit."
I don't see why the one can't lead to the other
Most eastern philosophies indirectly relate to western philosophy
give example
Sufiism; Ibn Sina; Sikhism
All of these are indirectly related to Plato, Aristotle and Plotinus
Yes. Ibn Sina specifically stated his inspiration was Aristotle
inspiration is separate
When your entire argumentation is build upon your reading of someone, inspiration is hardly separate.
And Sufiism's idea of "unity of being" comes from Plotinus, Plato and the Eleatic school
I love Jesus, read his teachings, I am writing poetry but dont mean that it realted to Jesus teachings
There is Ibn Arabi
This is a false analogy.
but others dont agree on unity of being
Ibn Arabi merely appropriated the idea of the one to fit islamic theology.
they dont agree on it
Then he doesn't agree with unity of being.
which is the heart of Sufiism
And Ibn sina* entire argument for God is indirectly based on Aristotle's writing in physics while reinterpretating it through Plotinus; that's why his argument seems like a "confused" ontological argument. It's just a fusion of two philosophers that predate him
Because, to put it bluntly, what I've read of it, it just sounds like neoplatonism reworded
Take Ibn Sina's "idea" of 'differentia' - that's Aristotles. Aristotle's works categories and metaphysics specifically.
I'd probably say the Ibn Arabi is a more egregious example of drawing on Greek authors; but that was common among every group during this time. It's not something new - So to say that "oh, you're reading greeks, boo" you must also automatically throw away a lot of islamic metaphysics*
Yess but ibn Sina had his own critical perspective about nature philosophy
Sure. I'm also not really arguing against any philosopher here. I'm just saying the idea of disregarding Western philosophers because they're western is stupid - Even most Arab and Iranian philosophers during the Islamic golden age would probably look at you weird if you told them that
Aristotle and Plato's contribution to most old-world philosophies, even new-worlds, isn't disputable. Greeks were far-ahead of their time in metaphysics, to the extent that a lot of their works is still relevant today
Very few authors can really be seen as comparable - Obviously in medieval western world we have Thomas Aquinas and in the east you got Ibn Khaldun etc., But if you read a lot of older authors in Greece, you'd quickly find a lot of their discussions are still debated today
I haven't read ibn Sina and Aristotle epistemology but both had own self explanatory factor
Aristotle -: about knowledge
Ibn Sina :- who moddled Aristotle epistemology about the reasoning
I'm not sure ...though
Yea - They're strongly related and worked and based on Aristotles. You can't find any large work during this time which wasn't at least impacted by the writings of Aristotles and Plato. An author I'd recommend is Ibn Khaldun; man's far beyond his time; I'd liken him to Giambasto Vico in terms of genius
both were generally unknown in their time but their works were only effectively recreated hundreds of years after
š
What does that picture mean
No clue - I'm not an artist. Nor is my concern art
Aristotle epistemology about knowledge
Looks like
That pic
š¤·š»āāļø I'm not concerned with epistemics either - Ontology chiefly. That's where i drew my distinction to
And idk what that Even mean
because that's the only form of metaphysics I can make any definitive voice on
All I know is - You can't talk philosophy without talking at least about Aristotle. Man's everywhere
I think that pic has deep meaning about knowledge and experience
A fun picture like this is the painting "the treachery of images"
It says "this is not a pipe"
It's a commentary on the theory of forms from Plato
Socrates goes brr
He's one of those people that thinks anything vaguely "western" is bad or inferior
Oh, that's funny - Granted, this prejudice exists even among western commentators; anything eastern is inferior. I just read whatever. Almost like two areas that's strongly interconnected will in some way cross-influence and define each other
Now I know nothing about philosophy but I'm sure that there would be middle grounds and things aren't as clear cut as they'd like
Uhm š¤ āš» https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/middle-ground
Well no I was more talking of philosophies that aren't unambiguously eastern or western, but I don't know much on it
I don't belive in middle grounds - I only believe in extremes. Either something is true, or it isn't true
It wasn't about extremes, simply about features
Just like having purple between red and blue
Ancient athenians always beyond of time ....but the question is why ?
A variety of reasons. I think a primary reason is they're one of the few groups who we have surviving fragments of due to the Romans; there's a lot to suggest that ancient Greeks drew a lot from Ancient Egypt, for instance
In a lot of commentaries on celtic mythology and druidic practices in ancient Britain, a lot suggests their philosophy was comparable to ancient Greece. But they only practiced it through verbal tradition, and not written
while ancient Egypt's writings essentially disappeared due to time
Specifically, the theory of forms likely arose from Egyptian notion of 'Maat.' The eleatic one and Platonic "Good" is likely inspired by Egyptian monotheistic (or henotheistic) god of Aten
Aten, also Aton, Atonu, or Itn (Ancient Egyptian: jtn, reconstructed [ĖjaĖtin]) was the focus of Atenism, the religious system formally established in ancient Egypt by the late Eighteenth Dynasty pharaoh Akhenaten. Exact dating for the Eighteenth Dynasty is contested, though a general date range places the dynasty in the years 1550 to 1292 BCE. ...
Specifically, there's always been a tendency of pagan and polytheists to move towards monotheism; Plato, Socrates and Aristotle were for all intends and purposes henotheistic
And what about democracy , arcataicture and science?
They weren't even 30 000 citizen ?
Likely independently developed. Democracy in Athens worked differently from modern democracy; modern democracy is largely based on Rome
But then again - Democratic bodies has always existed in varying ways. In Ancient Germany, most bodies and agreements in society arose through communities getting together to vote on it, known as 'things'
Cleisthenes
A thing, also known as a folkmoot, assembly, tribal council, and by other names, was a governing assembly in early Germanic society, made up of the free people of the community presided over by a lawspeaker. Things took place regularly, usually at prominent places accessible by travel. They provided legislative functions, as well as social event...
Tactitus specifically documents these formations. Roman "democracy" originate with the senate which was formed through a series of particians, who could advise the king and give formal agreement to matters - Often being of wealthy background
This isnāt actually true
Nice rebuttal.
The categorical social science depict 4 categories on two axis
This isn't even remotely a critique of what i said.
Foreign and Domestic as well as positive and negative
Asians typically fall under the perception quadrant of Foreign positive
š
This is white peopleās perception of course
So, you start up by arguing nonsense - then you go on to argue against a strawman. Interesting. Anywho, I'll leave the windbaggery to you
Windbaggery�
I mean - The ancient Athenian democracy was strictly speaking structured through sortition as a modus operandi; that is, lottery over election
In the sense you're just speaking for speaking's sake. That there's some eastern philosophy and authorship western authors like doesn't really change the point I've made. The point being that there is prejudice against eastern authorships, as demonstrated in the work orientalism
Itās literally a major understanding within the realm of social sciences pertaining to race-politics and white identity & perception.
That's cool - That doesn't make it right. And neither does it matter to the pretext I've stated.
Japan; Korea; Vietnam may be prefered - Does not make India, China or the Middle easter "liked"
You're essentially just saying nonsense to say it
Itās how white perception typically categorizes out groups.
Iām not saying itās right, Iām saying the idea that whites perceive asia as negative overall is incorrect
ām saying the idea that whites perceive asia as negative overall is incorrect
This statement is generally disagreed with within social science; E. Said specifically has already demonstrated the correctness of my claim, that there's a strict bias against eastern authorship within social science, and without, which is generally speaking a consensus. That you may agree with critics of that work does not mean there's a consensus the way you're desperately attempting to convince us of
At least within post-colonial studies, the general consensus is that western authors has a strict refrainment from eastern authors. That there's nuance within this I don't think matter to my statement - Nor is it a concern for the author I'm citing generally; a general claim can only be developed through generalized reference - Nuance is trivial in face of generality
Not going to click that.
Itās literally a pdf
Philip foltez depicting a athenians political leader while at their golden period...
IP grabber
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orientalism_(book)#Criticism You can read this though
Orientalism is a 1978 book by Edward Said, in which he establishes the term "Orientalism" as a critical concept to describe the Western world's commonly contemptuous depiction and portrayal of the Eastern worldāthat is, the Orient. Societies and peoples of the Orient are those who inhabit regions throughout Asia and North Africa. Said argues tha...
might educate yourself a bit
Hold up, how old are you?
Doesn't matter. A claim is neither correct nor wrong on basis of age
hey you two. lesgo to vc I'm tired of reading so much
Right, and I assume you have a degree in the social sciences?
I'm going to the gym soon
Same, might I ask what your focus was?
The prejudice within modern sciences is a bit more strict, in that we have structural national biasis. Specifically, people are biased towards their own nationality
Democracy is a form of governance in which
People are counted, not weighed."
Stigmatization; discrimination and racism within contemporary society
My projects has specifically be focused on stigmatization
I take it you donāt subscribe to the four quadrant pattern predicted by the Racial Position Model then?
It isn't something we were taught. Keep in mind, different countries, universities etc., have different focuses in their curriculum; it isn't universal. Secondly, I'd not consider a model a religious artefact, it should be viewed with skepticism. For instance, Korea and Japan may bear fetishicism and a positive view, but China is going to bear a lot more negative perception and prescription comparatively differentiated through time
even though all 3 are within a confucian-buddhist cultural sphere
The model therefor isn't going to be correct by definition
I take it you probably graduated around 2016 then
No. This year
Never. We didn't even focus on intersectionality a lot, most of my own work though draw on it alongside Goffman's theory of stigmatization and the concept of 'othering'
From what i can see this is a very american concept - I'd probably not say this is going to be taught in europe
suggests that U.S. racial groups are categorized based on two dimensions: perceived inferiority and perceived cultural foreignness.
Right. So I think you're misapplying it here if you're trying to translate it towards the way west-and-east view each other; it's a strictly speaking perception based, domestic perception based model within american culture. Doubt we'd find it relevant in europe
This goes a step beyond simple in-group and out-group perceptions.
And yes it is very much from the perspective of the American white conciousness
Itās more about the intersectionality of particular groups within the US
Well, then it isn't really a critique of what i said. The way the west view Iran will not really be relevant towards it
True, I apologize for not truly understanding your point before jumping the gun.
Now kiss
In either case - You'll hardly find this taught in Europe. Intersectionality is chiefly relevant among people who specialize in it, we only have one seminar on it. But for instance, the way I doubt you've read Stuart Mill's work "multiculturalism" i doubt this would ever be found in our classes
At least buy me dinner first
Aristotle doughter pythias?
Pardon?
Do you know who was Aristotle doughter?
Do you mean daughter?
Fck autocorrect shit yesssss
What about her?
man I need help wm homework
sup lousy
god bless canada šššš
Omg, is that twink
It's always been Twink. š¦ šØāš š« šØāš
& Ireland !
FINALLY OMGGGG
YESSSS
FINALLY OMG OMG OMG
About time.
literally
Tomorrow everyone is going to talk abt it
Hey guys I'd like to take a bit of an advise on how to fix my pronunciation for the TH and the B-P sounds
Those, who care about Canada
C*nada
Can'tada

Where's doctor house
This sounds like a bad joke
Gregory HOUSE that guy where is he
No need to shout
He was banned for Holocaust denial
Okay someone fill me in on the canadian issue here. Why do yaāll hate Trudy
Starmer will be the next
He's a loser
He destroyed relationships with various countries
Seems smalltime compared to our dipshit in chief
We had all better watch our step
š šš»
weird tax decisions
that ruined it all for the working class
some unpopular liberal policies
Arenāt liberal policies generally more supported by the wider populace?
From what I understand he just taxed the rich more and lowered taxes for the middle class
Agree
@desert nebula are you more leftist?
Dude, getting support does not equals to work
You see how is that trudeau passed that stupid bill whose taxes the canadians were supported by canadians
The real affect is, jobs go under the south border, canadians were fucked, and he feed bureaucratics under the slogan of climate change
Is that how liberal policies work ?
I think we will know better about liberalism after 2024, itās not about some daydream, but real interest link in between politics and bureaucratics which has nothing to do with peopleās interest
@dapper laurel do you know someone into Chinese history? Apart from 652
The Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act (French: Loi sur la tarification de la pollution causée par les gaz à effet de serre) is a Canadian federal law establishing a set of minimum national standards for carbon pricing in Canada to meet emission reduction targets under the Paris Agreement. It was passed as Part 5 of the Budget Implementation A...
Thereās no one need another bill that tax the population and feed the bureaucratics
Don't worry about it, people will figure out what you're trying to say from the context
Uh mine⦠you do know that liberal polices are generally more popular with the public when expressed in racially neutral ways
It doesnāt go to the beareucrats Mine. It goes to fund government projects
Peopleās interest tend to lean liberal;
For example; streets firefighters, healthcare, police,
Besides this had nothing to do about policy efficacy but policy support
WHAT FUCKING FUNNY is that Justin Trudeau is apparently not liked for his sympathies and relations with the CCP @feral river
And he apparently tried to use emergency powers to usurp the gov
I'm aware of that, full aware of that and people are fucked because of that.
People are fucked for wanting public goods?