#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 324 of 1
Sounds doesn't exist lol it's also a wave
Just to be sure, what are the seven colors you referred to ?
VIBGYOR
VIBGYOR
Visible light spectrum
it's relational, rather than it being a trait of the universe or humans as individual entity
Red Man In Van Uses Xray Gun
[Radio micro infrared Visible Uv ray X-ray gama ray]
We can only see visible light spectrum
sooooooo
a longitudinal wave to be exact, but for sound as we know it to happen it requires an ear
Too many random topics
Yeah wave in it self doesn't have a sound, our ear concert wave into sound
So light waves can create sounds?
It's transverse wave
Sound is longitudinal
We can build instrument to convert it to sound, but as far as ik we can hear light
interesting
si, the auditory transduction allows the magic to happen, as fascinating as it is, Humans lack the ability to regenerate ear hair cells
Your questions are really really beautiful ngl
If we think like that it changes the whole perception of the universe
Our reality is not objective reality
there never was an objective reality
Dayammm reality can be subjective
if there was such thing as an objective reality, how would we interact with it
💀
nah don't stop, keep cooking
He asked me a really deep question about why we can't hear light waves lol
Blud is master chef
My cat might not be orange, it's only my perception
This makes me sad
If everyone closed their eye, would there be no colours?
@manic juniper
there is a certain condition that can make someone perceive this as true, chromesthesia
Just googled it, and oh my fkn god this Is crazy
Aren't there the phosphenes? We don't really see no colours
well it's a pvp match so every country selected by players have to participate the war between great powers
i wonder what colours they see when metal rock is played 
Hold on i ain't getting anything, could you please elaborate more
Definitely not Taliban flag
a cat is what you interpret as a cat, it could be something different, let alone the color
epileptic attack incoming
My ex used to get those attacks 💀
especially with heavy DOOM music
hence why she's an ex now ?
grooving together with music. exclusive experience
i take back my words
Nope we grew apart
Apart from the attacks she was one of the most brilliant individual I've ever met
Anyway
Science always triggers my existential crisis
womp womp
you should give alchemy a chance
This can also answer the famous falling of tree in forest when no one is around question
It'll not make a damn sound
Because there's no ear around
yes, the analogy i always use is a plane falling somewhere with no living creature, it wouldn't make a sound
and what a coincidence, look at what day it is
It was September lol
M/D/Y USA is fkd up
what america see.
Is downfall
the West has fallen
Nothing will lasts forever not even Roman Empire or British empire
you clearly never heard of Albania
Similarly west will fall eventually for few decades east will be dominant
Enlighten me
?def sadistic
Definition (null): deriving pleasure or sexual gratification from inflicting pain on another
?def sadist
Definition (noun): someone who obtains pleasure from inflicting pain on others
💀
What
Defination of sadistic is mad
Could have been deriving pleasure from inflicting pain, suffering, or humiliation on others.
it comes from the french author marquis de sade.
you should check his books, they're very family friendly
Ok
discord not letting me upload a reply
"philosophy in the bedroom" lmao
Lmao send ss
That author is a rapist wtf
when you're psycho and locked up in prison with nothing better to do, you start rizzin
that's when he started writing his books
As someone who was obsessed with Egyptian civilization I can say it might be true
Damn I'm the animal with the larger colour range
That's why you're able to discriminate more and be more racist
/S
Are you fr?
Mammalian cut content
I'm too dumb to get it
No mammal has four cones to my knowledge
Just like only one mammal has pneumatic bones
Your knowledge is indeed quite limited in that case.
Now I get it
which one does then?
That is quite not true.
They're efficient, don't need extra things in already complex machine
Which ones do then?
Yeah but most mammals don't have 3 cones even
Not having at least 3 is just stupid
There is no point in me responding to the request, for the journey you will take to found out the truth is irreplaceable.
Sure pal
What about that article you sent earlier
Pneumatic bones are found in flightless birds such as penguins and emus.
According to it some might have 4 cone cells
🤦🏼♀️ since when are penguins mammals?
Post-cranial pneumaticity is not a thing in mammals except for the howler monkeys
Even then it's hilarious because they have ONE pneumatic bone, the hyoid
Oh, you said mammals. My bad I didn't read that.
The evidence isn't conclusive yet, it could be linked to colour blindness in males that results in tetrachromacy in women
To make em sound loud, that's masterclass by evolution
I shall point out to the fact that the stance of hatred between different species is usually called speciesism, and hatred against animals is called zoophobia, although colloquially you would call it racism, I higly recommend to avoid such a gross inaccuracy.
Yes, I love how mammals took an extremely overpowered and valuable feature and used it in the dumbest way possible
It's like the steam engine before it was used to power machines of every kind, it was used for entertainment or making kebabs
Imagine saying mechanism for territorial defence, mate attraction, danger avoidance dumb
💀
Thank you soo much for your explanation, I'll make sure to use correct word in future
Does evolution favour dumb useless traits?
That is quite noble of you to admit thy mistakes and master yourself to the very ideal stance.
Stop being racist towards mammals dawg, your reptiles are not better than mammals 
aint no way id fuck w/ reptile 🗣️ 🗣️ 🗣️
Don't force me to send a news article literally on it
I hereby officially force you.

I'm not hydrated enough today, my brain ain't working properly, engaging in intellectual topics isn't good idea, that's why I'm out
Yes but imagine if they used it to extend their potential and bring it to the stars
Hollow and pneumatic bones allowed reptiles to become overpowered, just one mammal with them could be too dangerous
It's hollow bones that allowed reptiles to challenge and defeat gravity
Good luckk on your journey back from Africa
how an animal can be innocent ?
they are the human's property
you can't say your house or the 50 bucks on your hand is innocent
hello
Like Chinese were property of Japanese
in ww2 under Japanese occupation areas yes
Bro Mine can you not with the shitty takes before noon? At least until I’ve had some caffeine in my system to balance out the nausea? @feral river
first, it's midnight here, second, I assume you are not affiliated with some stupid organization right ?
you don't really have to be the opposite of mine, you can give your counter point
and what I'm saying is basically, truth.
Youre comparing living beings to objects
Innocence can only be granted to beings not objects and things
who said they are not an object ?
objects dont have a nervous system, objects cant feel things
unlike us and animals, objects cant feel and arent alive
oh you mean "object" yeah they are not objects
but still no idea on how it is relating to innocence
can an animal be innocent ?
if someone is innocent, they dont deserve what is being cast onto them.
whether its a human or an animal
in this case, animals did nothing to deserve what we do to them
I don't think an animal could be innocent because they are human's property
that was a contradiction to your statement
for example, I can eat my dog, can you say it's an innocent dog ?
no I have the right to disposal my property
you caused it pain and distress when it did nothing to you, i guess you see it from an absolute competent point of view?
as in, anything that happens to you you deserve?
an animal could feel pain and distress that's the truth, but it doesn't mean that will stop my right to disposal their life.
if I cut off the food supply on them they will die by starvation
I understand, so you think anyone deserves pain if it is bestowed upon them simply for their inability to fight back that pain and suffering?
As in, you deserve whatever comes your way?
what trait do animals possess that makes them a property candidate
Well we do own them, they are our cattle.
you can claim ownership or guardianship over them, but this is well regulated, you can't do whatever you want with them as being a "property" implies
Well, technically we can.
What stops someone is simply their morals and what they see as right/wrong as well as society and legalities.
But technically we can do anything to them.
I don't specifically understand what do you mean by anyone deserves pain, I think if you are painful under any circumstances, you can react against it.
if you are not reacting against it, who can feel your pain then ?
technically you can break any laws or regulations, even when it comes to other humans, this isn't unique to animals
You can react but you may not be able to stop it, if a human decides to bestow pain on an animal, rarely that animal can react to stop it.
we can do that.
Yes, thats true.
What stops us from doing anything is morals and society, some have them, some dont.
you can't, what do you think anti animal abuse laws are there for ?
yeah but does that affact the actions that I did to disposal my property ?
wym by anti-animal abuse laws ?
does this exist ?
why do you think you can disturb "the public order" by abusing animals
self explanatory
It doesnt, what im trying to get to is do you think just because you can cause harm to an animal, the animal you're causing harm deserves it, simply because they cant fight back.
well ofc you can't disturbing social order in the public by torturning an animal
Yes
like you can't disturbing social order in the public by constantly break some objects
that's the same thing doesn't relevant to the target you are going to using for disturbing social order
are animals objects ?
they are not but those are all actions that disturbing the social order.
so you would be against torturing animals
Hello
I still don't understand the deserve part, that was total subjective based on my views which I explained to you, I have my right to disposal my property.
in the public yes.
in the private areas who the heck will cares that
it's okay to suffocate a cat as long as it's done privately ?
we can eat a cat or a dog as anytime we want
its simple, if an animal deserves the pain, hes not innocent.
if he doesnt deserve the pain, hes innocent.
that was the whole point, about innocence.
its a moral argument because innocence is a moral thing.
if you accidentally killed your neighbor's dog, you may only have to compensate the money based on the value of the dog you killed.
we're just talking about torturing, would that be okay as long as it's done privately regardless of anything else
well then I think you are right, you may have such moral view on something can be innocent regardless of which type of this stuff really is, you can consider a keybroad is innocent which broke by yourself because you are angry
I don't suggest that but you have the right to disposal your property.
Yeah, but keyboards arent sentient beings, they feel nothing.
I think you get my point though, it comes down to your personal moral values at the end of the day.
perhaps, my point is clear, they are properties, I may not suggest you to misuse them but I can't condemn you for exercise your right.
so for you it's all about the legal status, whatever is tagged as a property, the owner should have complete right to dispose of it if they please ?
Yeah, youre right.
Anyone can do anything to whatever they own. No one has any authority to tell them do this and that.
But it also comes with morals so you ideally shouldnt just torture an animal for fun, even if you own it.
No one can force you to not do it though, it comes to personal values and morals.
yeah basically but as I always mentioned eariler thousand of times, law/rule without enforcement is a toilet paper, even though it's illegal to do such thing but if there's no enforcement or no literal efficient enforcement you may risk yourself to do something illegal.
and you gonna pay your responsibility for it.
i think you know what kind of examples i would use to show how flawed this is
I don't think you have any examples could use against this core truth.
Law/rule without enforcement is a toilet paper
that you'd be completely fine with disposal of humans if in a given context they are portrayed as "property"
that's not possible in anywhere around the world, we have police forces or somewhere under military rules they still have basic laws to regulate people what to do, what you can't do otherwise how much you gonna pay it.
Mine, we're talking about this from a fundemental level, you're point was, the legal status is property then it's a property
just bite the bullet
based on valid enforcement, yes.
you are pro human murder, genocide, enslavement... just because the law says it's a property
that is false accusation, no comments further.
it wouldn't be shocking you tolerate animal torture
I don't do that I have 7 cats in my home they are living good
why the heck I would tortune them for nothing ?
can I get 500 bucks from tortuning them ? I can't
But for money you torture them
btw their life worth more than 500 bucks
that's called logical conclusion purely from what you've stated
Would you manipulate your girlfriend to be with u if it had benefit for u?
lmao bro has 0 morals
but according to -literally- what you've said, you're entitled to abuse them if you desire
well well well, I don't wanna state my affection history but I can give you my body count
lmao
I feel bad for ur partner but hey, i respect the honesty lol
not really they know what I'm doing and they are the type of person who's doing it
so both are benefiting from each other
why not
who the hell says woman doesn't have the desire of sex ?
that was the stupidest thing ever
im saying in general, like being manipulative etc...
im not talking about sex
well I didn't do that much, manipulate people I did it before I may break her heart but
lmao thats why i said i feel bad for ur partner, but i still do respect the honesty lmao
nothing impact me that much and I did benefit from breaking up
you will never know how fucked your partner possibly be
I'm not a fucking guy who's just randomly breaking people's heart
there was a fucking reason behind it
You seem to me like a "if it has benefit to me, i shall do it" kinda guy tbh
i mean, you stated its not wrong in ur eyes
yeah but interest do have differences, in my opinion if you ignore the long-term sustainable interest for short-term interest that doesn't even matter to you, you are so fucked of making decisions.
so I already got someone's virgin and there's nothing to having fun with it, why don't I just choose someone who fits my lifestyle to accept an easy request and we both don't have burden to liberate the innermost soul on the battle ground of a bed ?
it's hardly you can get benefit from breaking people's heart and you may got hurt back by their actions.
if you can easily get benefit from it you may find more people's doing it
where's the demand, where's the market, the unseen indiscernible hand of market is balancing everything.
if there's a business that everyone is doing, you probably will not benefit from it.
it's pretty hard to make me to do that, ofc I hold the right to disposal my property.
for instance, a million dollars
i've already made and clarified my point about your stand
yeah but that doesn't make me a bad guy
naah don't sweat it bud, since when being pro slavery or murder is considered bad
well no I don't promote that 🤣
don't criminate me from following the nature rule of survival for the fittest
people in USA are you happy by TRUMP coming? I JUST WANT TO KNOW ABOUT UNITED STATES\
Nobody is happy with Donald Trump being president of the United States
except for people who actually think Trump is better than Kamala
totally clueless
Even Joe Biden better than Kamala Harris
Joe Biden was one of the best presidents of the U.S. ever
Nobody wants a leftist backer that almost did nothing in recent years as vp and accusing some piece of shit to Trump
Donald Trump is just going to restore the order in the United States of America and make American people in the first place
He is not a European president he will make all of these guys pay for their protection fee
wtf are you talking about
He's gonna make rich people even richer
he's not gonna make America great
I’m saying he’s gonna restore the order in the US, no more zombies on the street, no more illegal immigrants, mass deportation
all trump does is push economic problems under the rug that’s how he made the gas cheap 🤦♂️
Put tariffs on everyone besides America
oh yeah, start a trade war
Yeah ofc he’s gonna do that that’s why I love him
this is beyond me
American doesn’t need a communist policy
What do you mean communist policy?
If you are seeking income equality go straight to North Korea, and you will enjoy it
Hi Suomi Queen
You said he will make rich people richer, what’s wrong with it ?
Helou
A lot of things that Biden and his administration did are things that conservatives complain about
Rich people should pay more in taxes than middle class people
Who told you that
Common sense
Why you think they have to pay less taxes than the middle class ?
In fact I don't understand why a conservative would vote Trump when Biden and Kamala did objectively better even where Trump made promises, from border, to economy, to even fighting Big Pharma
Does your common sense benefit the country?
Your common sense makes no sense in economy.
Your common sense is backing the communist ideology against America
In Ireland, my taxes go towards supporting families with more children (monthly child benefit), as well as those on social welfare
Yeah that’s why you are staying small, that’s why you don’t have Northern Ireland
What about the United States ?
North or Ireland is part of the UK
They are superpower they can deploy troops in anywhere around the world
It shouldn't be though
What does this have to do with Trump?
Yeah Hong Kong is also part of the UK in before what about now ?
It does matter because he prioritize American interests
Not you guys
*he prioritizes interests of rich Americans
Lol yea, when he said about make rich people more reach, I thought about USSR, he should love that
because it's classic USSR propaganda words against capitalism
He prioritized the interest of American state.
lmaooo
Yeah I support that he should prioritize more on riches
I don’t think those poor are paying their fair share taxes to the government but the riches are running the business, paying taxes, controlling actual power and help trump and America to maintain the global order
Then I wanna ask, people walking on the streets calling for some stupid shit, what tf they are doing for contributing their country?
They did nothing only messing around
Rich people moved their businesses in countries where it's cheaper to produce, they are weakening USA
That’s why they are losers, they lose the election
Here in Brazil is the same lol
American people choose Donald J. Trump
Where does that fucking mind of poor should be equal as rich comes from ?
Soviet Union ?
Only poor people voted for Trump
no one said they should be equal, only that the rich should pay more to contribute more to the economy
All those rich states that contribute the most to the American economy voted Kamala
Yeah poor people know vote for Harris she don’t give a shit and Trump will fight for them
Money are good when they move around the economy, if someone is just amassing them then it's no good to the economy
You don’t know what swing state really is ?
Dude they lose, completely lose
lmaooo
If this election didn’t happen you have your valid point
But now you are just defending a loser
It makes me laugh, that person hate USSR, but want regime like that, actually what nail is dreaming about is also socialism.
Get off the stage as the L
I’m sure the millionaire felon businessman has the American people’s best interest in mind
Yeah I just wonder where the fuck does that equal mind stupid common sense comes from while I can’t find another answer besides Soviet Union and communism utopia
That is real communism
Well since Trump is elected I don’t need to address that much
I will just see what will happen next
I don’t give a shit to a loser, this is my principle
You don't need to be socialist to enact progressive taxation lmao
Even Czechia has that
You talking about Russia? We did that because we need extra money, understandable why. I don't even argue about that, hard times needed hard action.
It not good, it what need to be done
Progressive taxes should be the norm
Not sure about that
Lower income inequality leads to lower crime rates
Hello I'm bored and wanna debate before bed and sleep with anger
So it kinda helps society in more than one way
Let's talk
people pay the same percentage of their income, for rich people it is much more money
What do you want to debate about?
If I work harder I pay even extra on this, why
I'm iranian so anything that relates to me
We had this conversation before lmao
Jk
Did you hear about the Iranian plot to kill Trump?
Short memory @supple harbor
So there are both flax and progressive taxes then
Mehhhh
Ofc I did
Payed 100k to some guys to pull it of
The main conspirator is in iran
I don't know if you've noticed or not, but earning more money requires more work, more training and more responsibility, and for some reason these people also have to pay more to the state.
As someone that was promoted to an higher position in my previous job, yes it required more experience but I worked a lot less and I earned a lot more
There is also a point to be made, how is it possible that some people earn many millions more than others? Did they work or study for thousands of years in a row? I don't think so, maybe they should earn 100 times more at most
Anything over 100 times more seems like unrealistic rewards to me
I have never had a situation where my job was easier and I earned more. I think your experience is unique.
it's always either more work or more responsibility
I had more responsibility but it didn't feel crushing to me, I was chief lab assistant at my university, I started as junior lab assistant years earlier
I never thought that I deserved more than those below me in the hierarchy, we just do different jobs and have different roles
in general, I can agree, but people are different. Imo responsibility should be converted into money. as for worries about work, the strongest worries were at school, and then I was a different person. I know a lot people, who going crazy when it's about responsibility.
great responsibility requires great work and preparation, it depends on the place and position, but you invest your time by working well in your place, spend time on learning thing, you become pro, and then you get a position, where you can work less, but the responsibility is higher, I think you invested your work and your time in this, and you should not pay extra.
Of course, I'm leaving out cases where a person is cheating in his position, or received a position because he is a relative or friend of somebody
Why people earn more that others people, because this people make things that others people don't, for example artist, managers and political. I think that real question is how the people spend your wealth. Thing again, how a people can concentrate wealth without earn wealth and how a people spend wealth without accumulate wealth.
There is a cool, bearded Jewish-German fellow who lived in the 1800s who wrote specifically on the topic of Wage Labour and Capital.
The "people that make things that other people don't" is an argument that works for everyone, I don't clean the streets, that's a job someone else does. So it's worth as much as mine
Working more does not necessarily mean you earn more. The same is true for physically demanding work.
The people who earn more are those who have control over the production of capital.
For example, people in real estate or finance generally earn much more than those in the trades or education positions. People who flip houses are not necessarily more skilled, educated, or hardworking; they simply have more control over capital.
Essentially, wages are determined by your position within capital's hierarchy as opposed to your individual labor power.
In most cases it mean. in any position if you try harder than others sooner or later you will be appreciated, even if you are just a waiter in a cafe or something
it is clear that in addition you need to be proactive, not be shy about declaring yourself, and so on
I get what you mean, but this doesn't often translate into higher pay or position advancement. My point is that regardless of how hard you work in your service-related job, it won't translate to wages as high as someone who deals in capital. Your wage isn't set by individual performance; it is set by the limitations of capital itself. You could work your ass off for 75-hours a week busting tables, and it wouldn't matter because it isn't hard work which determines your wage.
I work an office job with about three hours of real productivity in a twelve-hour shift. I make 7.2 times more per month than a miner living in Kenya. That's without factoring in all of the company benefits, as well as the fact that I live within the world hegemon with decreased product prices. I don't work harder than a Kenyan miner, yet I make far more, and my standard of living is higher.
Again, working harder does not determine your wage. Your position within capital's hierarchy determines your wage.
Every profession has its own ceiling of possibilities. A person sets a goal to become rich and he looks at what needs to be done for this. And the main component is he has work a lot. He will work more, than people around him to achieve this goal. this is the only way to achieve something.
In working more I include things like education, discipline, you spend all your time on achieving the goal.
Working more, it's not like you waitress, and just work more then others, and agree to stay one hour longer after work, for washing dishes. I don't mean that
I don't think that such people should pay more taxes than those, who didn't try.
although there was a story in Russia. about Demidov. he was a gunsmith, he had money but nothing outstanding. but he was noticed by the young emperor. and eventually, thanks to the emperor's help, he created an industrial empire. he earned so much money, that many of his descendants, (some invested money successfully and many did not) lived on this money super-richly. They were super rich just because.
hi
👀
pene
Hii guys I am new here
hi
The Weather outside is rizzy
How old are you?
Ok Thanks
What topic do we have today
too old
I am 19
nice to meet you bro i am 27
What do you work?
I am unemployed
How do I..well write better essays?
have a higher iq
Still didn’t see how it is benefiting the state.
social media influencers be like 💁♀️ these mfs just take a photo of smth and earn a lot of money
Earning more money doesn’t really require you to work hard but work smart, in this economy system to find a job or a business opportunity is when you can fit the role that in demand on job markets, it’s almost same thing compared with the rule of goods are rare then goods are expensive.
If there’s a normal society while 99% of people are lawyers, the last 1% of people working for generic production would be earn more than almost all of those guys.
Meanwhile there’s many ways you can directly see how the economy is impact everyone’s life based on its rule, it’s not a stupid game that you will think impose more taxes on rich which will make your society more fair to folks, but will damage the entire class of people’s interest, you think they don’t have a counter measure ? They can move out of the country, they can get rid of the business leave it to the government that doesn’t have much idea to improve it because it’s monopoly, they can move their money outside of the country that doesn’t pay your taxes at all.
If each one of those happened that doesn’t benefit almost everyone, the situation will only be worse than it before
Why we impose more taxes or restrictions on poors, because they could do nothing to against it
Once they did some counter-measure we don’t have to worry about they are stable, they are poor, they are stupid, they are non-power
because they could do nothing to against it
Except if they have guns 
Our current economy situation has already compromised a large share of the society to make sure those folks don’t go rebellion while they can participate some economy activities to become a rich.
This is the most fair system ever.
That’s why we compromised a lot to those folks, we protect their rights constitutionally, we let them feel proud of our nation, we select them by market that filter which one is benefiting the society and which one is not.
I just don’t understand how a nice situation it is while those folks still want to have more power, then we go talk by tanks.
I’m not gonna say deprive more right and impose more taxes on folks, that may not work and cause more trouble but I can clearly see through the rule of the economy to say, impose taxes on rich only will harm folks’ interest
Who’s benefiting from it ? Authority. Their money doesn’t go to your hand awake fucking loser
That’s why we compromised a lot to those folks, we protect their rights constitutionally, we let them feel proud of our nation, we select them by market that filter which one is benefiting the society and which one is not.
"let the market regulate the market" thats it
Libertarian process is happening in the society at large
that stupid left movement did not happening here is what I really appreciate.
they are the menace to the society hiding behind their so-called fairness, equality while what they are doing is stupidly follow some freaking ass opinion leader to f*ck everyone up
the problem is the centralization of power of force in the hands of state, only when there are more people able to defend yourselfs with gun power, and kill and die for your compatriot, the government no longer be able to increase rates and taxes...
and they think they are the helper they are the savior of the society, when something already happened in the history that a group of proletarians rise up and destroy the economy, destroy the state, destroy everything what they have left ? a state deep in poverty, a state that is extremely unstable, a state that civil war constantly happens, a state that ultimately become an ultra-totalitarian because they can't maintain their freaking shit.
Which country?
People's Republic of China, many people thinks we are communist apparently we are more capitalist than America
seriously? hahaha
China is not communist?
You really confused me right now
yeah for sure, that's the main reason I will continue to stay there.
I'm from a middle class family and I do business before, my major is cyber security (irrelevant to my knowledge) but I can tell you much about how Chinese economy works and how american economy works
okay making sympathy to folks that can't even earn 200 USD per month, I just can't sympathy with a loser who is not even trying to get rid of their situation but blaming everyone and beg more sympathy ?
if I was the person who's under beg by them I will say get your ass fuck off this place
and guess what did we do ? we did clear them get the fuck off of them all back to their place rather than staying in the city of Beijing, Shanghai, and other provincial capitals
including my home, Jinan city, capital of the Shandong province, you will see there's no homeless man because every single one we get their baggage straight back to their field.
that's the reason you would travel in China without seeing a homeless, that's why we are damn clean, efficient, without that much social problems like in the San Francisco
thanks to Newson did a lot during the Xi's trip to San Francisco, American people would appreciate it if Xi travel all around the america, america will be clean as ours
LMAO what a crap
blame government on the social media platform ? immediate mute or block.
that's how we maintain our social order that damn well
But Mao Tse was not a communist leader who killed millions of people?
he is but that's the past after the Deng came to power we transformed our state and economy towards capitalism
the biggest economy in the world based on purchasing power parity is People's Republic of China
second is United States of America
but you have a limit how much you can make of money per year?
not much my net worth is around 60000 USD and I generate 2000-3000 USD passively per year
I'm a student
but average annual income in China is below this number
but if you only count the city I live in, which is higher than this number and surprising we don't need to spend much to buy stuff because we are the biggest good producer all around the world because our stuff is damn cheap.
here in ocident they talk to mutch that people in China dont have freedom to make your on choices, living at a extremly totalitarian state and hostages of a system of social score, that make with the guys of already had problems with the justice or something like. Thats True?
not really, social score system is a lie, even western media confirmed it, and we are currently live under an authoritarian regime not totalitarian one
we don't have much problem in justice system
you can feel free to do whatever you want besides participating political events
How the Chinese people deals with marital betrayl? The politics benefits the familys in your vision?
Most of China isn’t like how Mine describes. Certain areas of China are allowed more fiscal freedom than others. Some areas are given more leeway. This gives it the appearance of a free capitalist state.
almost benefit everyone that contributed a lot to the society which means business owners, middle class people, and riches
Places like Beijing for example are policed less heavily to allow for some level of technological development.
Most of rural China however is under stricter laws than the cities
you are right on this point even we have differences based on cities
in my city we only undergone 3 days of lockdown under covid but Shanghai ? lockdown, open up, lockdown, open up
the capital of the XAR were under lockdown for almost 4 months!
depends on the region if you are mentioning the Northeast China then yes, but if that's the case just above the yangzte river which government clearly released a regulative measures against strict rules on farmers then no.
The justice system is another embellishment by Mine as well, its a thoroughly studied and understood issue:
There is a lack of transparency, gross overuse of capital punishment, lack of legal representation during inhuman interrogations which lead to incarceration without trial.
if you are a Chinese you are free to move for another state inside Chine or you can't do that?
lol that's your interpretation compared with american justice system
That’s comparative with the rest of the world mine. I have consistently criticized the American justice system
our justice system is completely based on the decision by the authority but they do follow the law as an instruction and guideline to prosecute people.
I don't think you would disagree with it, which is true.
I disagree with many things in my country’s justice system
well I can't make such comment in my country but in here I don't care that much I would say it is a flawed system
you can see corrupted cases everywhere
As Mine demonstrates, there is an increasingly worrisome level of nationalism amid the population @thorny steeple
like Tencent, a major company in China that almost never lose if the case were transferred to the Nanshan court.
Of course the same can be said of many countries who have neo-fascistic parties
Beyond that there is the obligatory mention of forced labor that has targeted various racial and religious minorities in China, which has been denounced by a majority of the world’s countries.
also those courts are prosecuting political criminals like former Chongqing secretary, the biggest opponent of Xi jinping, Bo Xilai, who's the only man can challenge Xi's power were prosecuted by the investigation of corruption
but we all don't know where does that corruption comes from
As you can see, their legal system is fucked
I don't wanna say this is a fair system, this is not a fair system at all, all the time but it worked
well I can't say that in the public if I was in my country because I may face prosecution of disturbing social order
and spread hate speech.
Granted you probably won’t get a fair answer out of me or Minecraft here, he’s drank too much of the coolaid from the CCP and I probably am too much of a ‘Democratic Socialist’ to give you a look into Chinese global politics that doesn’t point out it’s use of genocide
That said @thorny steeple I’ll send you some third party resources on the subject if you want
I wanna say you are right on this point but I still holding a frank mindset on the CCP which is a qualified party to rule the China.
we don't have much choices.
technically and practically
We all have a choice
move to america ? valid one but unnecessary to me
I can do that actually
Oh hell no don’t come here lmfao, not looking much better with things going the way they are
Go to finland or norway
lmfao I can really do that bro if I decide to immigrate to other countries I will come to America
I won't go some places like Japan, Norway, Finland or other places like Israel, but United States of America
Good luck you’ll have to pass a ‘whiteness’ test in the coming days probably
I embellish
Not for real
not yet I can enjoy my middle class life drinking my americano in the starbucks where in the center of the Jinan city, why would I get a fucking mortage that constantly steal my money and work in mcdonalds ?
I do advise caution against coming here right now, hate crimes against minorities is up by 20% rn
in blue states ?
Everywhere
woah that's a huge number
Happened last time Trump was elected too
Racists are emboldened by his own blatant use of white supremacy
I'm an american stock investor, a bond trader
Women are fleeing red states for fear of their safety
They’re bleeding out in the parking lots of hospitals because they are being denied basic care. Doctors refuse life saving care for fear of being prosecuted by state governments
Laws targeting trans youth have driven families to other places
why the heck doctors would refuse life saving care ?
what ? that doesn't make any sense
Because the life saving care is an abortion
oh crap
The death rates for newborn infants and pregnant women has doubled in states that ban abortion
Sensible
Beyond that many same sex couples are fleeing to states where their marriage licenses are protected by state law.
I bet he will force every state to adopt abortion ban
which will likely a victory on his side of ban abortion nationally ?
but I don't see how it is benefiting the state
Good luck half of them already adopted it in their state constitutions many of them are republican
they can still get an abortion to another state right ?
Besides many states would just say “lmfao fuck off we’re not listening to you”
they just need to drive their car to a blue state and get an abortion
Texas tried to make going to another state for it illegal
And is trying to stop pregnant women from traveling which is federally illegal
what
I keep telling you man this is the party of Trump
how is that technically possible this is not just anti-abortion this is imprison pregnant woman
what the fuck is this too wild
well... I still don't see what he can get from these radical measures against woman but
people support him apparently
🤷♂️
This was a bunch of Trump supporters at Texas Uni the day after the election
oh wtf that was too wild (I support that animals are property but definitely not a human being)
if you are waving this in China you will face prosecution of disturbing social order and spread hate speech
this is slavery to define a human being as a property
clearly slavery
Why do you think slavery is listed on his sign? Lmfao
what the fuck is wrong with these guy lmfao
Texts sent out to black students in Texas by a Trump supporter the day after the election
duke university
omg I never thought the racist problem in america is that damn severe
Its gonna be this bad and probably worse with Trump in charge
he's likely a racist
At it’s height during the Trump years, hate crimes rose 35%
honest to say
but he's qualified leader that knows how to benefit american state at most
He doesn’t
that's why support him I guess I know that was not good for american people
He has no prior experience running the state before his last presidency
His companies in NY and his charities were shut down for illegally handling funds
Which is how he got famous
told people to drink disinfectants ? idk if it's a rumor
That’s literally true
well I have heard a lot about Trump in our Chinese media platform I didn't take it seriously
He suggested killing covid with bright lights here lemme pull the clip
you will die from drinking disinfectant
President Trump said researchers should try to apply their findings on sunlight's effect on the coronavirus by inserting UV light into patients' bodies
Subscribe: http://smarturl.it/reuterssubscribe
Reuters brings you the latest business, finance and breaking news video from around the globe. Our reputation for accuracy and impartiality is un...
Do you understand why we’re all fucking terrified with this dumbfuck at the helm?
wtf is he speaking 💀
wait I don't understand what
Yeah
wait what
He’s got middle stage dementia probably, lots of doctors have commented on his behavior
using the powerful light inside of the body, and inject the disinfectant in the body under the instruction of a doctor ?
would help covid ?
Nope
what the fuck is this stupid shit
Welcome to my world
Donald Trump insisted on Friday that he was being 'sarcastic' when he raised the possibility of disinfectants being injected into people to combat Covid-19, prompting the makers of Lysol and Dettol to say its products should 'under no circumstance' be used as an internal treatment for the coronavirus. The president instead focused on another pot...
disinfectant works on the hard surface, so disinfectant works inside of the body
media who say I suggest people ingest disinfectants are fake medias ?
Yeah no he kept pushing it
Here’s one he can’t deny
#news #video #australia #world #youtube #subscribe
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/smh
Subscribe to our journalism:
https://subscribe.smh.com.au/
https://subscribe.theage.com.au/
Listen to our podcasts:
https://podcasts.smh.com.au/
https://podcasts.theage.com.au/
Just uh
Watch
ohhhhh what the
what the heck dude
im gonna share this to my friend
He goes down on the Mic like its a blowjob
Yeah wanna see his response to being called out? Its as funny as you think it might be
hadjob and blwjob on mic
?
omg im gonna share this to my friend
well that was.... considerably a valid concern
I got terrified from this shit
china virus
Kung Flu
AHAHJAHAHAHA
crazy dude
hating trump for being hilarious
This is the same guy that said he’d date his own daughter if they weren’t related
that's normal in alabama
He’s from New York first off 🤣🤣🤣
I appreciate so mutch if you can talk me more how things are in China, you can send me private chate if you prefer.
what's the trump-epstein case
Sure I’ll send you the stuff if you want
I don't know much about it
Oh that, Epstein and Trump were best friends
but they can travel to alabama and fuck there
He kept pictures of Trump hanging out with topless underage girls
sorry for the delay I had to go to the oil station
No worries hun
uhhhh... anyway that's his personality issue I think he won't screw americans up as it predicted
clutist aaaah reply
I’d look at his actual economic disaster plan Mine.
Most people were worse off in the Trump years
it's agonizing to see people believing his policies for the economy are good for workers and consumers
well that tariffs literally used for maintain the american dominance
They did the opposite
The taxes that those companies had to pay? They just added the cost to what consumers had to pay
It just increased the price of goods in America
there are studies about how tariffs affected the very industries it meant to protect and the consumers of their products
exactly, some tariffs were applied on imported washing machines so that the local ones can compete better, they just ended up matching the new price for the imported ones
It’s literally just this meme format
the consumer foots the bill, and somehow his goal is to make life more affordable
That’s exactly my point
Tariffs in a short term will significantly increase the price of goods but will help domestic businesses and achieve industry independence
But regardless of how you gonna achieve it, your American worker is definitely more expensive than Chinese worker and the price of goods will remain higher than before
So what
Is it something new that there are a lot of stupid people?
that's a little bit offensive to us because we also let some criminals pick cotton in Xinjiang
Subscribe to our YouTube channel for free here:
https://sc.mp/subscribe-youtube
Read more about this story: https://sc.mp/ragkw
World leaders have started reacting to Republican Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential election on November 6, 2024, when he capped a stunning political comeback four years after leaving the White House afte...
This chat is deader than my phone at 2%. Y’all alive or what? 😂
it shouldn't be that active as all stupid guys yelling about their freaking shit
Chill, and go study

Am here to teach someone languages like Spanish English French German etc if you are interested kindly massage me
Teach Zehra @verbal torrent Russian
Less funds to spend on police to pursue cases and solve them
Less property is damaged
Maybe the gulags weren't a mistake after all
well well well, you know how much you gonna spend on police, and how much you gonna spend on giving the equal wage for people ?
they ain't match at all
income equality is technically impossible in a capitalist society
and you can give them more money doesn't mean that they know how to spend it
most people will remain as a poor not because they don't earn enough money but overspending it
if the money were stored in the banks or holding by anyone without any transaction or simply, save it will contribute nothing to the economy cycle.
in other words, the income equality only will create more inequality in other fields
I need someone to help me with scrabble... My classmates forced me to do a competition for our section. I would really like it if someone helps me 😭
Please pm me if someone likes to help. I really appriciate it 🥺
the taxes imposed on rich doesn't really help you in any cases for a long-term maybe you are happy that they were being taxed, but guess what they have thousand of counter measures against the tax imposed by the government, they can move out of the country leave your country have barely no competitive industry in the global market
If they move out it's better
It's not like they are spending those money so they may as well leave
let's assume authority would use the money taxed from the rich will use it on the fields you would care about, education, medical services, but that ain't generate value
well then no riches, no competitive industries, your country will be like North Korea then.
because you can't generate value with bunch of proletarians
They are free to move to North Korea and start an industry there
they won't move to North Korea but they will move to somewhere and give them a settle with a lower tax or zero tax like Singapore, Dubai, Shanghai, Hong Kong
and Israel
that's why they are rich, and their citizen are generally rich
They can try that, most of those places are small and don't have the same opportunities, resources or population as the largest economies in the world
If rich people prefer to live in European countries despite all the taxes maybe there is a reason behind that choice
you have know that if you impose your taxes upon those riches, you will unable to use your resources and population to grow your economy
Not all do, but a sizeable amount of them don't move out of their countries
nobody wants to do a business with a high tax.
When USA used to have high taxes on those people they did not move out, and their country grew stronger
and a high tax would literally means less business.
Neoliberals thought that giving more money to rich people is good because they will eventually spend a lot of them, but turns out that it's not the case and the society isn't improved at large
Taxing the business is different from taxing rich people
they may not spend a lot of them but they would try to spend it or invest it not storing it in the fucking banks
storing money in the fucking banks literally means a portion of wealth on the market disappeared
that contribute nothing of your economy
and rich people have the professional teams to manage their wealth to investing industries, real estates, buying golds, bonds, contribute to the economy
Why don't they move to China if they hate European taxes?
or you give those money to poor that they will only buy some stupid stuff from riches that instantly goes down in value which eventually the money back to riches under domestic economy cycle
Maybe because they still prefer Europe
They could raise and impose progressive taxes all at once so they force those people to stay or move to countries where most wouldn't like to live in
I don't know that much happened in Europe but I can tell you every government gives subsidies to certain industry, every government impose high taxes on certain industries but depends on which one is taxing much which one is not.
Industries are different from individuals
in China if you buy a box of cigarette that means you paid 20% of taxes to the government, and cigarette business were monopoly by the government
and if you find some data you will see there's less revenue generated by cigarette business every year.
they aren't growing that much.
That's good, they need to die
did he count russian monki
I don't want to treat people for self inflicted lung cancer
lol, what I can say, I would say they are contributing the economy in the first place
Yeah but it's a paid cancer industry
and idk if you want them die or not most countries do high tax on luxuries
but let's go back to some black history of CCP, if Mao zedong in Jinggang Mount saying that no fucking cigarette businesses that damages people's health, they won't have the money to expand army and win the civil war.
everything is backed by the economy in the first place.
But Mao isn't alive and you don't need cigarettes to win a war now
the only privilege you got is based on the stable revenue generated by your industry and what you are promoting is likely destroy them.
another example is Russia's main government revenue relying on vodka export and consume
they will running out of the money to recruit more soilders, buy more advance weapons to fight against Ukraine if they say no vodkas, that's for people's health even the death rate by over-ingestion alcohol is among the highest in the world.
so you got 2 choices if you are Putin
- ban the vodka for people's health and lose the war, dismantle the Russian Federation
- let them thrive sell more vodkas and win the war, then subsidize other industries to generate more profit and slowly cut vodka off for people's health.
I didn't say to ban cigarettes, but you can slowly kill the industry like New Zealand is planning to do
why the hell we have to kill a way that could generate revenue ?
Alcohol has more cultural value than cigarettes also
contribute to the economy will benefit everyone in this country
but cutting off certain industries or taxing on the riches will only damage folks' interest
You don't have homemade cigarettes, amateur cigarettes, regional cigarettes, the most you have are Cuban cigars and other products like those but they're not that many or special compared to alcohol
you know what the word rich means
but why we can't have them ?
we can have more cigarettes and sell them for the economy
rich people have no burden to consume and once poor people addicted they will generate more revenue
once they got sick they will pay their medical bill
R they planning to get rid of it?
sometimes they are broke and all of their money contribute to the economy and they die which have no aftermath upon everyone
if I was the leader I would say why not ?
Addressing our nation’s long-term fiscal challenge will require additional revenue, including higher taxes on the rich. However, before policymakers succumb to the popular desire to impose higher marginal tax rates on the rich, they should consider whether taxes are as unfair as many people believe. They should also consider the potential uninte...
Yes
Ig it will difficult to do as tax they earn form it n addiction of ppl
Cigarettes are banned for people born after 2008
So their industry will gradually die over the years
Yes maybe, yet they will find some other addiction to have
that's sick
why don't we allow people from drinking alcohol and smoking just after they were born
or we force them to consume those stuff
and our economy will boom
No but he said and etc, what mean any languages 
but they way they're dealing with it is through a ban lel
Gradual
albeit, a ban
Don't touch vodka
SUPPORT US FOR $5.00: http://Herohero.co/thegoodliars
Talking with supporters at the Trump Rally in Greensboro, NC on November 2nd, 2024.
totally, revoke lead ban as well so the money wheel keeps rolling
Solve the mathematical question
Math is not about the formulas, its about the way you solve problems in general. learning how to deal with problems with a more level headed and logical approach.
Mine, putting more money in the pockets of poor people has always been better for one reason.
Fiscal velocity.
Interesting
Whenever we give rich people more money the money doesn’t come back into the system, no one benefits. They have no need to spend it. But if more money ends up in the pockets of Poor people they spend it immediately on things like food housing medicine and childcare items
That creates more wealth for everyone and reduces the burden on relief aid programs
If you read books you should try reading Rich Dad Poor Dad
As Robert Kiyosaki says (if i wasn't wrong): if you collected all the money in the world and give everyone on earth the same amount, people who were rich would be rich again, and people who were poor would be poor again
"b-but that means rich people would be less rich!"
The point is about achieving a better wellbeing for the biggest number of people
But doing it within a limited market
If you gave a poor man some money, most likely he would invest it in a wrong way that doesn't benefit him and that's why he is poor
And if a rich man got stolen, he already know how to gather money so he can be rich again
Hope my grammar is good enough lmao
it worked when we had extremely wealthy people who could not really move anywhere and the surplus they don't really need and don't invest in anything was just lying around like in the Scrooge McDuck cartoon, of course that time the government raised taxes to the clouds and directed the excessive money back into the economy.
ANd that is not the case now at all, since most of the wealth of billionaires is in assets and already working in the economy
If you want to do something teach poor people how to be rich or at least how to manage every one dollar they get
Yk Africa is a huge piece of diamond and gold but in the same time they are poor asf
Wrong. The New Deal proves you wrong. Also blocked. You're another idiot.
the new deal was a huge fail and america recovered because of ww2 and state expenses
funny guy
Can't read blocked messages. Bye bye.
who cares
lol he continues to refer to me even tho im blocked
bro deleted his message 🤣
so pathetic
that was called domestic consumption which will not grow your economy bigger only provide some incentives to your local business
I really wish I could read blocked messages. Too bad.
u dont know man... this is true
Proof? 
look at the gif... its real
its proven
Ahhh you got me
haters say its fake
Youre right ig im a flat earther now
yallah... welcome
we have people all around the world
Lmaoo
I have a three day weekend so fuck all of you 🤣
if you wanna earn some money from other countries, you need a group of rich entrepreneur with experienced team to dominate the global market
not a bunch of small business owners only know how to do business in their street
Tariffs are at the center of former President Donald Trump’s economic plan. He wants to put across-the-board 60% tariffs on everything from China and 10%-20% on everything else from the rest of the world. It’s an extreme trade policy that he wants to use to generate revenue to cut taxes. But how would they work?
WSJ explains how tariffs work a...
maybe it's the reason that economists hate trump's tariff
but his tariff is used for maintain american dominance over the earth
maintain US dominance and at the same time vouch to disband NATO and drop support for Ukraine, yes
he's not really going to disband NATO but threat Europeans to pay their share and protection fee for the US
Ukraine is not his shit
neither under the US global order
he made his goal clear, thankfully they passed a law to stop the country from leaving it
either you're very naive or extremely naive
a major adversary attacking a country you were backing, hmmmmm
and you say the US has no interest in Ukraine
not really I would say it's pretty clear that Ukraine, a poor nation, the front defense against Russia which is neither in the NATO or being influenced much by american investors
does Russian is in the US global order ? if you say 2018 I would say yes but not now dude
neither Ukraine is in it.
so was South Korea, Taiwan and Israel when the US started backing them, it wasn't their wealth, it's mere interests
wealth were part of the interests.
and we have priority to choose what we gonna preserve
why don't you go protect some nation in africa then
if you don't care about poor or rich
mine, what wealth was in a random small peace of middle eastern desert when the US got involved in supporting Israel
oh what the fuck you don't know that ?
oil
after the gold standard, the USD is based on the oil
do you know how much oil Israel has ?
it was binded to the oil
no but use Israel as proxy could threat the nation who want to escape from the US global order
Israel is the only US proxy in the middle east
it was US interests in that region that got them to back Israel
yes
if oil price doesn't bind with the USD, we don't have any reason to use it for global trade
South Korea had no wealth when they were backed by the US, it was pure interests
and you can't use your money printing machine to cause inflation that loot other's asset so easily
You’re typing here mr Saimon
that was in the cold war era, not under Trump administration
how many times Trump meet with North Korea leader is what I think uncessary to mention
if you're telling me that you can't see how the Rusky-Ukrainian war can involve US interests, then you'll need to rethink about it
VC is about Islam, always islam, gets too boring
I can tell you it has, but it was not worth that much as you think.
America doesn't need another Vietnam war
and Ukraine war is likely to be it
Oh yeah some people just like to hate certain religions rather than criticizing them logically
Russia being stuck into a Vietnam-esque war similar to the US, wouldn't be good for the latter's interests
yea, but even if you have valid criticism, these kind of conversations go nowhere
That’s why I leave the chat when certain pseudo intellectuals join. You never know when they ban you for pissing them off 😄
you reached my point before i said it, except it would be Vietnam for Russia
Pseudo-intellectuals is the best way to describe them, debating for the sake of debating
idk if it will be, I only see they are likely to have a negotiate with Trump and annex some part of the Ukraine to end the war
or cut off the Ukraine supplies, let Russia fully annex the entirety of Ukraine
that's what Trump hints at, which is basically surrender
I support that lol
I can't be more obvious I support Russia and Israel.
a lot do, but it doesn't align with US interests
With the rise of China, BRICS, Ukraine-Russia war, this is the worst time for an isolationist to get in office
he's not a isolationist lol
large parts of his policies are
idk why you guys hate trump
nale is a socialist that make sense
i'm stating reasons why his policies are bad and you're wondering why
I don't wanna say his policy is the best in the world, but it's better than Biden administration
at least he really do something for the economy, for the dominance
he know what things have the most priority
Who wouldn't be better than Mr. Dementia?
However trumps predecessor didn't do as bad with the economy as others say
let's say Kamala Harris ? she's pretty bad I think
She is more lucid, but the foreign policy is almost the same
lucid with a bunch of leftist supporter and ignoring what the fuck have happened at the border
Everyone knows in the end that she made most of the decisions during the Biden administration
You mean no matter if it’s the government of democrats or republicans, the foreign policy remains same ?
nope
nope
they have clear differences on foreign policy
No, no, it's not that at all, but her foreign policy would be similar to Biden's (I'm talking about Kamala)
It's not in her interests
Of course they both represent democrat party
Biden's administration did well both at home and abroad
lol
even nale won't say he did well at home and abroad
I've been waiting for 2 years for Ukraine to win, if that matters
They spent a lot of resources for a stalemate
what made you assume it's going to be a short war ?
oh no, this changes everything
2 years is still a short war
yes
It didn't even start 2 years ago anyway
Apparently the Russians thought so
2 years isn't a long term war lol
it's going to be a long, long war
Kiev by 3 days
in HOI4 maybe, irl not so much
It's about to end
not really I'm saying irl
in hoi4 I will just need few month
we can't know for certain, but if Trump surrenders it could
yeah we will keep supply Russia to let them win
North Korea already send their troops to the front line
what we are doing is handling their logistics
How do you imagine Ukraine's victory?
China doesn't bind itself to any Russian cause, they could drop them in a moment if they want
a win in this situation could be counter intuitive, it would be hard to imagine Ukraine getting back the lost territory
My predictions for the peace treaty:
Signed in Istanbul between Russia, Ukraine, USA, and the highest levels of NATO and the European Union
•Buffer zone for Russia along the entire border with Ukraine
•Russia will annex what it has conquered (annexation will be recognized by the Western bloc)
•Ukraine will not be able to join NATO for the next 20 years
•Western states will have large contracts to rebuild all of Ukraine
•Ukraine will be able to join the European Union
•Ukraine will strengthen relations with the United States, which will indirectly continue to supply it with weapons
•Expulsion of all citizens who recognize themselves as Ukrainians in the newly conquered Russian territories
turning this into a long and painful war that sucks as many resources from the Russians is a good outcome from a US perspective
if victory means taking back all the territories. what will Russia do, when Ukraine takes back all the territory, will it say we surrender? I just can't imagine what picture of events you have in your head
There will be no victory for them, but they will not be completely destroyed either
EU would never recognize the annexed lands
no NATO for Ukraine ever, or EU membership (it has a military component)
Ok than
And?
the other outcome of Trump allowing Russia to annex those parts to end the war, would be giving a message that these kind of acts are rewarded, Russia and other adversaries will exploit this
Well, from the moment a peace treaty is signed, it is inevitable to recognize a Russian victory and annexation of territories
what and ?
im saying what Russia won't agree to
The EU may agree to call Russia by another name, or agree not to recognize the territory, and then what?
Then there would be no basis for a peace treaty
EU doesn't recognize Crimea as part of Russia
My predictions:
Russia will fully annex the Ukraine.
This is for now, maybe with a future peace treaty between Russia and Ukraine, yes. This war started in 2014
Wanna bet?
after you win the match with me
No, wait, I actually don't have money
I spent it all last night
This is hard, you know
You play as Germany
yes mother
Me as the Soviets
They never recognized it and what?
You've already erased me
you can sign a contract with me that unconditionally work in the cotton fields for permanent life.
I truly don't understand why it matter
and period. that's it
How much will I earn?
Even china don't recognize it, but we work together
0 USD per month
Fair enough
but I can provide free place for you to live with enough food for survive
not bad right ?
I'm in
Will there be girls?
Hire some girls too
probably or you can rob them to the fields with you
there's no cops can get into my fields it's on mars
????
I can raid other fields, cool, I expect to have a team to get all the resources though, can you get them for me?
We can also establish an independent state and declare war on the world
Why you change your country every week 
It depends on my mood
I'm in Turkish mood now
just this message alone is enough to give you a free "re-educational" trip
im down if I will be the eternal supreme leader of everyone
For example I would like to conquer the Balkans now
everyone must unconditionally follow my order or death
you won't be the first Italian to try kek
I would like to be re-educated in truth
we'll conquer greece he said, give us a week
But in the end we conquered it
You all don't understand something here. Firstly, we most likely don't have such a large contingent to capture large cities of Ukraine. Now the war is going according to a different scenario, we can't concentrate forces, because drones are flying. And on the other hand, the cities in Donbass are fortified fortresses, which are very difficult to attack. But behind them are fields, and behind the fields are populated areas that have no experience of many years of built defense. And those territories will be taken way easier. It war match
Like Albania, and some parts of Yugoslavia
But we are brotherz now 🇮🇹🫱🏻🫲🏿🇬🇷
don't worry I have friends work in the re-education centers I will cover your back
🇮🇹🫱🏻🫲🏿🇬🇷🇦🇱🇷🇸
in the end y'all got rizzed, and lil musso got fanumtaxxed
Albania > all balkans (including italia)
👐🏿🇦🇱👐🏿🇦🇱🇦🇱👐🏿🇦🇱👐🏿🇦🇱👐🏿
you will be sentenced to death under the anti-treason law agianst Italy 😠

this is promoting separatism against western Italy
Albania was an integral part of the Italian nation
We need some re-education camps
Albania is the cradle of western civilization
You can't imagine my face when I see this 😂
@feral river
WHY WHY WHY
Hanging death, immediate execution!
i mean, if i had to choose between reacting to loosing an election like this or January 6th, i'd totally go with this
Well, I would have chosen something in the middle, you know
Cuz kamala belongs to the middle class
she belongs to leftists, communists, anarchists
and she's a loser
Dmden bir şey sorabilirmiyim
I'm not Turkish btw
And what kind of thing would that be?
Ok
actually he is jewish
@manic juniper downloading spyro, switch version (remastered) you said, at least first game is good there. I will try it
what a death match between world's largest and second largest economy
btw that would significantly increase the prices and inflation to combat with us
@modern lily @modern lily
The first game feels a bit outdated in gameplay but the other two are great and timeless
Ok
