#🧠|serious-chat
1 messages · Page 294 of 1
The Gaza strip has been under an Israeli illegal blockade for a very long time, perhaps that would also be considered an occupation.
idk if you misread what i wrote, but Gaza has been considered occupied since 1967
Lol
Yes. Israel occupied it from 1967 until 2005.
they're not going for settlements, just corridors to better counter Hamas rockets fired towards them.
my honest reaction
I've never heard him speak until yesterday
congrats, he unironically always talks like that
a classic "the west has fallen" enjoyer
hey
I don't see the point you consider the people who kicked your ass as a coward
qq. I from Ukraine and i need practice before my Java interview with hr in english. Reply if you want make something like mock interview with me/
is that even possible
why qq?
I would say you should have retreated for incorrect informations after you send that bullshit in here and don't judge me for questioning the correctness of your information which you should have NOT send incorrect information in here.
for your bravery, cowardice narrative or something LMAO
you being ass kicked not me
we are the global power in charge
that is the real power, wanna try to challenge ? see you on the ground
Ever heard of the march of return? from 2018 to 2019, Palestinians in the Gaza strip used to hold peaceful protests each Friday demanding the return of Palestinians who have been displaced from the occupied Palestine territory, obviously the Israeli response was killing a total of 223 Palestinians. Israeli snipers used to kill medics during these protests.
So, who to blame for Hamas and other groups that are specifically held under the name of resistance?
let me fix this, Israeli illegal immigrants in Gaza Strip used to hold protest against Israeli state and they were being cracked down very fast, ofc if they don't fight against the state power they won't have any causalties so good job Israel Defense Forces.
I know right, that was interesting
The definition of terrorism is: the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
If you're justifying Israel's actions, you're objectively siding with terrorism, which you usually demand not to.
And it's definitely cowardice, the IDF have bombed almost every single hospital, school, and other civilian facilities within the Gaza strip. Hurting the weak does not demonstrate any kind of bravery or power.
Free Western Sahara 🇪🇭
that's how you are using terrorism to defend your terrorist state who initiated the war against a regional power which being ass kicked even as considered and recognized the de facto terrorist regime under hamas that's how you are being a terrorist sympathizer and talking back to me
while you guys being ass kicked no matter it's hamas or hezbollah, they are heading to hell as what it should be
blame on Israel ? blame on anyone ? idc you can blame at least if you are alive but they will recklessly crack down on terrorism with us and the US
🇺🇸 long live the war on terror 🇨🇳
Why did Hamas and other labelled terror groups begin to attack Israel?
that's why Israel begin to crack down on terrorists as always side by side with the US
You didn't answer my question.
that's what I wanted to see and donate some money through investment ? I'm down
buy some guns and kill terrorists
the only solution to deal with terrorism is send them all towards hell
You still didn't answer my question. Are you deflecting?
yea i know of that event, IDF fired live ammunition on the premise that Hamas was involved and that some of them were armed, but it was still too excessive and unnecessary lose of life, big L for israel here for sure.
but this doesn't render Hamas innocent of the terrible things they've done towards israel and their own people
free Eastern Western Sahara
just because we're fighting terrorism doesn't mean no cost is too great
If Israel did claim Hamas was involved, and then proceeded to murder children according to Amnesty International:
According to local Palestinian human rights organizations in Gaza, at least 31 children have been killed while protesting during the six months of demonstrations.
Several videos posted on social media have shown unarmed protesters – men, women and children – being shot by the Israeli army.
[source]
Then there is a strong reason to believe Israel is making false claims to justify their actions.
David Cameron, a former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, labelled the Gaza strip an open air prison over 14 years ago. [source]
Israel every few years bombs Gaza as a part of a strategy it calls "Mow the Lawn", referring to Palestinians, not as human beings, but as "Lawn". [source]
This puts Israel in the aggressor picture.
well for Hamas we do know they supported the protests but to what extent they were present isn't clear. When it comes to violence though, some of them were throwing moltov cocktail and attempting to breach the border and even used incendiary kite, which caused damaged in israeli farms.
Children did that? I doubt it. If that's true though, why did snipers kill medics?
I can't find a justification for killing medics, even if we assume they killed children throwing molotovs.
i couldn't care less what the UK's prime minister has to say about this.
Israel's firing was indiscriminate and when you have a large protests made of both young and old it becomes harder to avoid such consequences.
an unnecessary and unfortunate outcome.
Except that you should. The UK has always been a close allay and supporter for Israel. His view about Gaza gives a lot of input about how the situation is going after Israel's illegal blockade.
i don't care as in the sense the opinion of a prime minister doesn't change facts or realities, it's not like Gaza wasn't considered under blockade until he acknowledged it. appealing to authority is a fallacy
Snipers are known for their precise targeting, saying that they were indiscriminate in their shot further strengthen the thought that they intentionally killed the medics and other unarmed Palestinians.
Then you chose anarchism?
snipers were not the only active shooters in that protest.
lel how did you deduct that from what i've said ??
Well no government = no law it goes to hell
no, that's not what appealing to authority means.
It's a Fallacy, when providing other evidence or justification, uses an authority figure's opinion to support their argument without their support of the figure's opinion
Avid reader of politics ig
yes, it's like saying Haitian migrants are eating dogs and pets because Trump said so
Wasn't that debunk
haha it was, but that didn't stop many and even trump himself from repeating it again and again
the MAGA experience at it's peak
True what a headache he is in this country
Asmongold Reacts to: Trump returns to site of assassination attempt for rally with JD Vance, Elon Musk
► Asmongold's Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/zackrawrr
► Asmongold's Twitter: https://twitter.com/asmongold
► Asmongold's Sub-Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Asmongold
► Asmongold's 2nd YT Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/ZackRawrr
Channe...
The fallacy of appealing to authority is committed when one cites a popular figure that agrees with them without a justification. I've cited a former British prime minister, this is a proper justification given that the UK is a close allay to Israel.
it's not like Gaza wasn't considered under blockade until he acknowledged it
That would be an irrelevant statement.
However, given his remark, it's nothing new. Israel's blockade of the Gaza strip has always been deemed illegal and a form of collective punishment, as it restricted the flow of essential goods, contributed to economic hardship, and limited Gazans' freedom of movement. This has actually led to not only the UK former prime minister to call it an open-air prison, but also several human rights organizations such as Human Rights Watch and Norwegian Refugee Council.
lel not asmongold kek
Yet they were spotted killing medics according to Amnesty International.
Well it never is unbiased
Kekw
@dense agate
Why didn't Israel simply allow the Palestinian refugees in Gaza to return to their homes where they were displaced? Using violence to block them from their rights makes Israel's position 10 times worse.
i know you weren't using the fallacy, but the PM's opinion is not needed nor worth mentioning.
and for the blockade, yea we know it's there and it's bad, nothing that i disagree when it comes to this.
Nice, then we've reached a mutual agreement.
the firing by itself was a poor choice, whether snipers were used or not, doesn't change much.
are you sure a bout that
Well life is can be in between
Well it was them who caused all the middle east problems after WW1
As I've previously mentioned, snipers rifle personnel are primarily used for precise targeting, so assuming they were blindly firing, although would be unfounded, is also a proof that they didn't care to who's being killed.
on some few fundamental things i guess, this conflict is not as simple as many perceive it
It never is simple
well the poor UK lost most of it's relevancy since then, so...
he's a MAGA farmer
True but it was their division of the middle east that we see how's it nowadays
Who?
yes, them and france, which is the cause of many tensions in both Middle East and Africa to this day
Asmonbald
Didn't notice it before
True
I disagree. It is simple if one looks into historical events.
A Palestinian territory has been occupied by illegal settlements and groups of Jewish extremists who have committed massacres against Palestinians, this occupation has been supported by the UK initially before it hands over the case to the UN.
For further information, have a look at this video:
https://youtu.be/zE8GCX1w3ys?si=GgdvTiw8qnNRsW0Q
We often hear that Israel and Palestine is a complicated issue. It's actually not, and here's why.
We take it back to the beginning and find out the history of how Israel got it wrong from the very start when it comes to Palestine.
Since the occupation of Gaza , over 20,000 people have been killed.
If you enjoy OnePath content, please consi...
The conflict is really only 100 years old.
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
One of the biggest myths about the Israel-Palestine conflict is that it's been going on for centuries, that this is all about ancient religious hatreds.
In fact, while religion is involved, the conflict is mostly about two groups of people who claim the ...
0-4
respectfully i don't watch vids to learn about these kind of things, but i can already sense and guess the rhetoric he'd be using
there was never a Palestine before 1948
nor Palestinians
I don't see there's a Palestine for all the time
they were never a sovereignty state but remained as a organization-party based separatists government
Since the creation of Zionism
yeah we cost we spend we drop bombs on them and if we don't drop now we will pay more
the best solution is drop enough bombs on terrorists and kill them all to end terrorism crisis
there wasn't a Palestinian national identity prior to Israel, Israel was built on the Mandatory Palestine ruled by the British back then.
they never became a state because they didn't get enough recognition from the west.
1st they didn't got recognization or even established some economic and international ties with global powers
True there was only transjordan
2nd they control some territory which is under Israeli sovereignty
yea but who is a terrorist ? are we considering civilians as potential recruits as well ??
civilians are not terrorists, I didn't justify any actions against innocent civilians
but some people violated the law or the rule under their local government so they will be punished
but dropping bombs in a highly urbanized area can be very disproportionate, ending up killing many civilians
like separatism in Israel and other anti-government forces initiated and led by terrorists
huh what ? what local government
State of Israel
Should Israel exists people
depends what you gonna do if terrorists hiding in buildings ? are you going to let your soldier to send their life to heaven for clearing them ?
no, we will just detonate the building
this is how war works not anything this is a war
you're aware Gaza and the West Bank aren't considered part of Israel, even to the state of israel, both territories are considered occupied
yes duh
there's only one sovereignty state in this region which is State of Israel.
there's no other one no doubt
that's their Israeli muslim/arab territory
well that can be interpreted differently, israel has influence in both, but they also have their own governments that do also have a say on some of the internal matters
or autonomous provisional government under Israeli sovereignty by State of Israel
We need a state that doesn't bring division between the people there
no they will just recklessly enforce on them
because that's under their territory
i have a question for you guys
and they have their forces, they have their justice system and other state departments active in this area
do you all want to be happy?
idk if you know but even Israel is in the motion of creating a Palestinian state, it's not like they completely oppose it, this is not a case of secession, dont confuse it with other cases of separatism
if yes , then WHY?
there's zero tolerance in Israel, that's how they gonna recklessly enforce anti-terrorism operations internally and externally.
Those type of videos can facilitate conveying information that otherwise would take walls of text in the chat. However, calling it a rhetoric would be argumentum ad hominem, since the statement attacks the person rather than his statements or arguments.
However, no worries. You don't have to watch it.
Are you happy
that's what they do not just what I say lol
well at least they didn't do it now
they are creating zones in those region, and they are fighting terrorists and separation forces
they even fought them abroad in Lebanon which is under their influence
hence why i said fighting terrorism doesn't mean no cost is too great
I should give them more when they started to fight against Hezbollah
but they don't really have a good performance lol (profits)
cost to what ? is that damaging your interest ?
I don't think so
there's a clear number of how much money they gonna spend on military
Địt mẹ trung quốc
don't do that in our territory
all of waters in this region belongs to PRC
Fuck u don't make excuses
and we will enforce it by force
the lives of civilians, it's really fascinating how easily we can dehumanize people by reducing them to mere casualties, it's analogous to how the chinese casulties were seen back in ww2
yeah we died a lot of ppl ur right but that's not your business and it's truth
isn't it ?
However, about this statement. Let me show you two pieces of evidence that prove you wrong.
First is the old Drain covers that had the name Palestine on them. Ironically, some of them still exist in the occupied territory.
Second one being an ancient Palestinian passport dating back to 1933.
Japanese killed them in the masses but they high numbers didn't strike much since it's only the Chinaman who's dying
yeah that's right but is that your business ?
how is it being my business or not relevant to this ??
it's not my business that millions died by the japanese ?
do you lose 1 USD from it ?
so what you have lost ?
that's your citizen ? they are paying taxes to you ?

Ancient stuff
It doesn't mention the Palestine war in 1948, only the naqba
True
why you think it's your business, it's not your business
bUt Is iT yOuR BuSiNeSs is the most retarded way to reply back to such catastrophes
why do you think i have to lose or gain something from me to know about it ?
or for it to effect me ?
the truth is you didn't lose anything from it
it didn't affect you
i couldn't care less about what happens in any conflict since it doesn't effect one bit
yeah that's it
that's it bro
moral > profit ?
no what the heck is moral
that's what ? wow thanks captain obvious that the bomb falling in muslimistan didn't affect me
I can use profit to buy guns, can you use moral to buy guns ?
no you can't
easy logic
bruh buy guns or whatever you want, irrelevant
I can use profit to buy house buy anything that possibly to buy by purchasing powers or money
but what the heck you can get from moral ?
I don't see a point because I'm a sponsor of Israel for sure
I take profit, and I don't see a point you judge me for that you are not muslim or you aren't from a muslim state
that's literally none of your business
a moral tuning fork, can give you the right to attack another country
Địt mẹ thằng lồn Đông á bệnh phu sủa ít thôi
it's not my business to say casualties are bad lel
this is a failed attempt on being edgy
you can say that lol I do think casualties are bad
I'm agreed with you
but some casualties are not inevitable
for example while fighting against terrorists
there's no solution to kill all the terrorist without casualties
at least for now
my dumbtard i was saying casualties are bad the whole time, that was my point, necessary or not, that doesn't change their nature
well yeah I agree with that statement but some casualties are inevitable
that's why i said just like the casulties China experienced by japan in ww2 are bad, these ones are also bad
anti-terrorism need to be enforced everywhere
that's true, ngl
True, its a sign you failed if you end up killing more than needed.
And anti pirates?
well yeah literally screwed up if you killed more people that you should not kill.
but you had to go on a ramp about "not your business " for some reason
because I don't see a point you started to mention some old history about us and how Japanese killed many people
and before that, I was just asking is that damaging your interest ?
put it in context next time
that's why I said it's none of your business
REAL
ok
The ship above was the 1% of pirates
But the actions of those ships are 99% same as pirates.
That's difficult to estimate after so many centuries
@dense agate
Have you heard about the "Map of Palestine" created by French cartographer Pierre Jacotin? He made it in 1799, that's way before 1948.
you've understood me wrong, the mandatory of palestine existed, the region called palestine did too, but the nationalistic identity of Palestine never did, there was no such thing as plaestinian people or aims of creating a palestinian state like we have today.
there was even a British census on the region about what kind of state they desired to see, it was greater Syria
if you're going to track the name "palestine", it goes even prior to that
facts don't lie, we need more pirates
and what was the result of the kind of state that they want , what ppl choose
It mentions the occupation, Balfour Declaration, and the UK and UN support for the Israeli occupation.
Later, Israel actually have established a law called the law of return, which gives only Jews with one or more Jewish grandparents the right to relocate in the occupied territory, opening the doors for illegal settlements that are usually under the sponsor of the Israeli government, and the displacement of Palestinians who used to inhabit these places.
is this a rhetorical question ?
I know. But it leaves out a minor detail: six countries got involved
Palestinians is a word that refers to Arabs ethnonational groups who've inhabited the land of Palestine. Just like Egyptians refers to people from Egypt, Syrians refers to people from Syria, Germans refers to people from Germany etc...
I'm just asking about the results of the survey and the number of votes
@dense agate
What do you mean?
Nice. Then we've reached a mutual agreement. 🤝
That's a pretty big event and he didn't mention it
Going by names is a weird thing, isn't that the entire reason why Israel exists? Because there used to be Israel and Judaea
"This place had my name on it so I'm supposed to live there"
Palestine isn’t a state, sadly. Its not a nation recognized by the international community
This video seems to completely neglect the Balfour Declaration, a declaration by someone who is not an owner to whom something did not deserve. It dates even before the UK's attack on the Ottaman Empire, which further demonstrates the intention to occupy this land.
referring to the region doesn't mean you're referring to a nationality, and this referring to Palestinians as in the people who reside in that region includes all the groups who reside there, that goes without saying again there was no national identity for Palestine, the arabs that existed there shared a stronger identity with their Arabic ethnicity.
and the term evolved later to be associated with arabs living there rather than all the cultural groups
Good. So, you agree Israel is in an offensive posture, since it occupied a land, displaced its people, and imposed a system of apartheid against them. Not to mention a long history of massacres against and imprisonment of Palestinians without a trial, even children.
it was greater Syria, a large states that unites all of that region
Yes
there's no Palestine but a terrorist government supported by terrorist sympathizer call themselves Palestinian
they are not Palestinian
it's getting hard to get the motion back on talks about establishing the Palestinian state when this current war keeps on worsening
they are either the separatists of the State of Israel, or the terrorists
since when Fatah is terrorist ?
I don't see there's still an idea that justfying themselves pretend they are a citizen of a non-existing state
actually they are not, some of them are terrorists
Fatah ( FAH-tə, fə-TAH; Arabic: فتح, romanized: Fatḥ, Palestinian pronunciation: [ˈfʌtɑħ]), formally the Palestinian National Liberation Movement (حركة التحرير الوطني الفلسطيني, Ḥarakat at-Taḥrīr al-Waṭanī l-Filasṭīnī), is a Palestinian nationalist and social democratic political party. It is the largest faction of the confederated multi-party P...
it's been clear of what fatah is doing
Fatah isn't considered terrosit since 1988, so what are you saying ?
separatism, violated the law of State of Israel
wym ? that's what you considering it ?
Israel is in charge of these regions not anyone
it's not the US or China or Russia it's Israel
what they say is terrorists which it is.
I hope Iran punch Israel hard, those dude annoy me as f.
I'm not agreeing, but assuming it's true. The people we refer to as Palestinians would still be considered the indigenous people of that land, even if it was not considered an official nationality in the modern sense.
It's worth mentioning that this land was under the Ottaman Empire, they also used to refer to people from there as Palestinians.
All in all, this leaves an inevitable conclusion that the present-day Israel is indeed an offensive occupation.
Ottomans, British, are not Palestinian
there's no Palestinian
minecraft, you're looking at this from the wrong perspective, this is not about separatism, or secession, both sides acknowledge each other, the lands on which Palestine would exist when it happens are there, the West Bank and Gaza, the talks were about what kind of state it would be.
To israel, the west bank and Gaza are occupied state that are not part of it, they are not separating from them, it s about ending the Israeli military rule, West Bank for example is subject to the military court of israel, it's similar to how Japan or Germany were under military rule by the US.
although many in West Bank have permanent residency, Gazans don't have any documentation in Israel, these are not Israelis
i don't know how you would make that conclusion from what i've said, when i made my point on why palestine didn't exist prior to 1948 so there was no occupation, but okay
that's what their terrorism rhetoric says about how we gonna separate west bank and gaza from Israeli administration then the destroy the entire Israeli state, my point is clear, there's no Palestine all the time it shouldn't be have one for multiple reasons
My question still awaits an answer from you:
Why did Hamas and other labelled terror groups begin to attack Israel?
[#🧠|serious-chat message]
there's only one sovereignty state in this region
which is State of Israel
their land, their rules, quite simple
Isreal is collapsing.
Edit; has been collapsing.
Grammer. Always a point of weakness.
Israel by itself was in talks on "separating" West bank from it (not gaza since it's not in it's administrative rule), so what now are Israelis pro terrorists to you ?
if you gonna say there's a lot of Israeli arabs who currently under terrorists rule I would say yes and Israel is helping them out.
there's no another sovereignty state besides Israel in the region
can you find another one ?
@manic juniper What do you think?
are you intentionally misreading what im writing or you're just ranting again ?
how serious is it
I don't care what their rhetoric is I focus on truth, truth is Israel in charge of all of those region
You agreed that this land was indeed known as Palestine, and agreed that certain groups of people were indigenous and inhabitants of that land.
The definition of occupation is the state of taking control of (a place, especially a country) by military conquest or settlement. This means the issue is actually simple, the land is indeed occupied.
no I understand what you are saying about how this part of Israel is not Israel
where did i say otherwise, you're talking to yourself, read > comprehend > reply
I totally understand what you are saying
and I'm saying that's your narrative of saying how is these region is not Israel
it's not part of israel according to israel itself, there is no palestine yes, but there were talks prior to this latest conflict and for a while.
it's separatism obviously
It's stupid to have a West Bank and a Gaza strip but no East Bank or Gaza towel
they are the de facto ruler of these region they are in charge
isn't it ?
the truth is they are in charge
Do you support Israel though?
what's israel and what's not isn't clear and no one can claim it is, even according to the Israeli law, they don't formally define the country's border
yes they are the hegemon of the region
Not the current Israel
what no they are in charge of these region
why you are looking at papers
Or an Israel per se, I support two states that would turn into one over time
Not when Iran in the game.
you can change papers anytime but forces won't lie
law/rule without enforcement is a toilet paper
So no I don't support Israel or Palestine, or maybe I support both, doesn't really matter
What they did all that time fight Iran proxy
the great confederation, the Palestinian state would be a puppet state almost certainly
Iran cool enough to make big harm to Israel not use their own force
What happened to this.
That would be another reason to believe they might be planning to occupy more land, as you've pointed out previously that they claim to occupy Gaza to protect themselves from Hamas and other labelled terror groups.
This reinforces the notion that they make false claims to achieve political goals.
Hm no I was thinking of creating a natural, mixed country in the region that would form peacefully over time as Israelis and Palestinians/other Arabs would set their differences and hostilities apart
Only hope for Israel is Us help
well it won't happen anyway Israel will just keep in charge
It's stupid. Arguments after arguments and no conclusion. Why no one talks about culture or social norms or maybe even weather or many other matters which can extend our knowledge. Why do people assume they are such experts on political matters?
the place was the Mandatory of Palestine, on which the UN Partition Plan was made to divide the region between the groups living there
Paleo-Lakelandic
Sure, but it was a long time since the acknowledgement of Israel by the international community; yet Israel has not clearly defined its borders. So, it does rise the question of whether they are planning to occupy more land, and therefore, defer defining their borders.
although i tend to support Israel more, i would be lying to say there would ever be peace when the hegemon of the region has a different principles and cultural identity, the whole area is doomed with long conflicts, whether the matter of Palestinian state is settled or not, that wouldn't turn the place peaceful.
it's a somewhat similar case to Prussia.
woah don't be like that there's no Palestine be confident about it
Israel will keep in charge as what I say and it happens all the time
terrorists will lose
yea this is a solid criticism, they don't define their borders and they do have interests (whether are forced or not) to expand.
I will never support a loser
never
I support Russia in Russian-Ukrainian war, I support Israeli in war on Hamas
The entire Middle East has people in conflict, they must accept one another sooner or later. And there are many countries with minorities that may be treated like shit but it doesn't always end in conflict. I don't think it's impossible for them to build peace together but there needs to be a lot of external pressure on Israel and the neutralisation of all terrorists
you're the kind of guy to be be shining the Japanese's soldier's shoes if you existed in ww2
What if Ukraine wins
better than being killed and raped and being buried in the holes
a weird perspective
I will support Ukraine then, I don't support a loser
why the heck anyone would support a loser ?
he's a person with no principles to say the least
L ? wtf ? what's wrong with the world
do u have a country bro ?
I support the loser if the winner is something I hate
Exactly
I have one my country is powerful and I'm proud of it
People's Republic of China
this doesnt change the truth
Proud of what covid ?
every empire can collapse
I don't see a point to pay off to a loser
or a puppet state ? they can't even on the stage
Yes, and they've indeed tried to occupy the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula before, it was before the Oct 6th war when Egypt returned it in 6 hours.
well that make sense but L is L
you won't change the truth if you hate the winner
and for Palestinian one it's 0-4 L have you ever see my Yasuo did 0-4
Ukraine had no chance to win even when they successfully counterattacked
If Finland won without assistance against a much stronger country why can't Ukraine
yeah you guys gonna take Ukraine back to Russia make sense
it's a region with a history of deeply rooted conflict, grievances, territorial dispute and ethnics/sectarian tensions. so it's going to be pretty hard to make peace there, would probably require another hegemon to enforce that
my principle is damn clear: I do not support a loser
but japan in ww2....
the best that can happen for Ukrain is that the war will last so long that it will be easier for Russia to conclude peace on unfavorable terms. this is the only way I see theoretical success for them
they L got 2 atomic bombs in their ass
not chine bombed
we won the war
Ukraine has been hindered throughout the entire conflict by having limits on what they can use or where they can strike up until now
we won
it's somewhat like how africa is plagued with conflicts and civil war due to similar reasons
thanks to america
don't touch my Russia
Hopefully they deliver them enough weapons to destroy all the sources of the conflict in Russia
thanks to america not gonna lie
You annoying me.
i mean you were on the losers side at the time
well we will provide more stuff to Russia through North Korea
something something the president
the whole process is, China -> North Korea -> Russia
aight bro, keep edging
that's how it works lol
A lot of people to be honest, not just him
No problem.
People don't like it when their ideas are criticized and go against their opinions.
Killing him may stop the war but he's not the only one that wants it badly
keep intense, buy our stuff and we will buy their cheap resources
we both don't want to end the war (US and China) why would the war ended ?
are we to hold all of them and their children as was done with the Tsar , keep the tradition on going
this will not happen. the less success Ukraine show, the harder it is to get new weapons.
It's more about them fighting or not, Ukrainians will fight even without any support so keeping the flow of weapons going is not a bad thing
idk if they will lose but they are likely to lose
I ain't surprised if Ukraine is part of Russia
and it should be an integral inseparable part of Russia
You may not have noticed, but Ukraine received huge amounts of money from the US. And many of our analysts, predicted that this money would be enough to stop our offensive by the end of summer or the very beginning of autumn. This did not happen.
I don't know if they will lose or not but it's better if we make the potential Russian victory as difficult and bitter as possible
It show something bad
idk but we will keep send stuff through North Korea
it's hard to imagine to us if Russia lose the war
Ukraine needs ammo more than money, Biden seemed to have forgotten about it and they were in shortage of ammo for a while
I can even say that Russia won today
If Ukraine used coins and banknotes to win they would have won long ago, they need missiles and bullets
Money=ammo
Yea it cost money logistics, also remont weapon stuff. Those money were for weapon mostly
they are likely to win and I support them because they are side with us
they are not losers
They need twice that they already get to get any chance to stop us, not win, to stop
sell more resources and we will provide more stuff to you baby
don't worry China is your back
when u get taiwan
Hm no the production of ammo wasn't really in circle so they couldn't buy ammo that didn't exist
Yea, also it win win situation. If Russia loose it obviously who will be next enemy for western
yeah so fight hard bro
we will provide more stuff I promise
North Korea is also considering to send guns to you guys
I think my Kim Jong Un mister will take care of you
You're making them do all the dirty work
shush
that's a fair trade don't say it so tricky
If I fail in life, I'll go fight in Ukraine
we are helping our friends
A promise to you West and Ukraine
Why is it illegal to drill for oil in Cyprus
why don't you try to start a life in North Korea
that's a communist paradise
the real dream land of communists
btw I hope all the communists just get to North Korea and develop their communist utopia
What on earth
a inseparatable integral part of Italy
for africa 👊🏻
Yes get those annoying western Marxist-Leninists to North Korea and Cuba
You are not friends, you are partners, BRICS itself has the sole function of opposing the West, but when the West is defeated, what will happen? There will be a new war to establish a new Chinese world order. BRICS is a collection of countries with nothing in common, and investing in a relationship with the Chinese is shortsighted
Do you mean UK
Not really
Yeah man
well.... BRICS is an economy alliance 😭
Russia is in a die-or-die situation
the meat grinder continues
So? What prevents them from also becoming a military alliance in the future?
it was not used for against the western rule but achieving economic sovereignty and independence on the US-led order which we have that capability to develop our economy institution for the new world order
+100k
idk but I don't see there's a chance we can use it for military purposes at least far from today
those are casualties, these are just deaths
I like this statistic when Russia doesn't publish statistic.
i wonder why
Well, actually you have simply created your own sphere of influence, as you did with the New Silk Road
because they need more soldiers to fight in the war
if they publish the statistics there's no more source of fighters
You can ask why, but you don't have numbers.
well yeah we have that but that's for economy
for a bunch of survelliance devices inside of the buildings we gift to some government
the numbers are getting buried in ukraine, day by day
Italy left the new silk road because Chinese exports here had tripled, the same did not happen with Italian exports to China. It was not convenient , and this makes us an economically dependent puppet, as it was happening with us, it will happen with others too
well well well that's how the price of your goods goes up
The one good thing Meloni did
when I want to fantasize we will have a good dialogue, but not today.
I'll just explain something. Russia doesn't report the number of victims. It could be 1000, 50000, 100000 with equal success. But there are no numbers and there is no point in talking about it.
25ml
And when you talk it meat grinder for Russia you guessing
Meloni is not that bad for foreign policy, I'm only concerned about her economic policies and her associate ministers
This is it
Some of them are incompetent
Our Minister of Culture doesn't even have a degree
Like Meloni, btw
for example, you think that Ukraine kills more Russians than it loses its own people, but you don't have statistics
Germany and Finland in WW2
I would not say her foreign policy is inherently good, rather careful
yes, fantasize
She feared being politically isolated because of her extremism, at least she was good with foreign policy
She knows that she cannot disappoint her european allies like Orbàn and other extremists. And that’s crystal clear from many occurrences
there are no statistics but we have statistics that one Ukrainian kills three Russian. It not enough to win by the way. But we don't know that
1 Ukrainian kill 6 they have a chance
But who say it like that, what if one Russian kill three
wow russia doesn't publicly show their data so we can't make any judgement about this or attempt to find an approximate 😔
Yes
it can only mean that Russia had no casualties
She's too neutral and in times like these it isn't really a good idea
Not even funny I explain what it mean.
you can assume they have no casualties
🤷♂️
it's not meant to funny, it's absurd
Russia also claims they have destroyed 13+ patriot systems…..
It might mean 1000 or 100000 but since you don't know you can't do anything
Only two exist in ukrain
when I talk about something I don't use numbers because there is fog of war and I just don't have the information
I mean her foreign policy is filled with insecurity because she knows that either way she’s gonna disappoint someone. It’s an hypocritical positioning
that's why it's called an estimate, and it's not like there would be a huge gap in them, there are both independent and Ukrainian sources.
Didn't Russia friendly fire on their own stealth drone and they only have two of that model

That should be difficult to replace
terrible yet not close to the Indian Sindhurakshak incident
listen to propaganda more. even if we don't have these drones at all, imagine that all three were destroyed, it doesn't affect the situation
Russia also fucking ran out of gas 50 miles over the Ukrainian boarder… how the fuck do you make that kind of a logistics error
Ukrainian drones go prrrrrrrr
if there was one type of weapon on which the entire outcome of the battle depended, but there is not
There were two S-70
The US spends more on intelligence gathering than Russia’s entire GDP. I think my info is reliable.
Sad
I saw pictures, they could be edited
Are you for real, you think it affects battle ground? If we lost all new steals drones or some gase
there is no weapon other than nuclear that can affect us
I know what will stop us this fall, it will be weather when tanks won't be able to pass
with or without tanks, catastrophes like the one in Bakhmut would be hard to avoid
to be honest about the situation, we don't have enough people to capture big cities and this is a huge problem. this is about the disadvantages of the offensive
it's not only about having enough people, it's also due to losing a lot of them to capture a single city
an actual meat grinder
I didn't say it affects Russia, just that they're difficult to replace
then I apologize. I heard about that drone, like I understand they more tests it, not really use.
notice i never said meat grinder. although russian propaganda says the same thing, that the battle is a meat grinder for ukrainians. but i dont have numbers and i cant make such a conclusion, but you can
In the end, shes western
In a nutshell
Controlled opposition
https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-ukraine-meat-grinder-campaign/32328051.html
the term "meat grinder" is used by Russians as well.
you're free to call it a meat grinder for Ukrainians also, whether you would back that up or not is up to you
A friend of a mobilized Russian soldier from Siberia has gone public with the man's account of Russia's costly offensive in Ukraine's eastern Donetsk region, describing how poorly trained and equipped mobilized soldiers take enormous casualties trying to storm hardened defensive positions.
Its war
in response to this I should find a Ukrainian who calls this a meat grinder for Ukraine?
I just like the level of argumentation
I think that like communication
lel, you took the use of the term as a "western propaganda", the article i posted is just to show it's not uncommon to call it so from the Russian side, even high influencing individuals called it so
Where are you from?
sure, you can go from denying the ability to make estimates through intelligence to whatever you want
You don't understand what I mean, it was sarcasm
I have no doubt that there are a lot of victims. But there is no data, you understand, I have no data to say that this is a meat grinder for Russia or for Ukraine, the term itself is propaganda. It's like saying we are retreating, but they are losing a lot of people and it seems like we are winning
Japann?
i never made a statement about winning or losing, just the casualties, and for Russia the estimates are high
II did
Explaining why use meat grinder termin
Those who offensive lost more people usually, this is only what I can agree with.
to describe the brutal high casualty situation, it's like a combat metaphor, it was used also in both Chechen wars
I don’t like metaphors and analogies, they are only needed to explain things that are difficult to understand.
like Schrodinger's cat
not always, even in a brutal attack as D-day, the defenders had the higher casualties.
Yeah neptune operation
you could've used DMC to illustrate this but nooo
Why
more fitting due to the nature of the enemies they're fighting
But is the Lapland War accurately represented?
¿¿ the Finns turned on the Germans ??
then i guess it doesn't represent that war
Yes, we were forced to in order to survive
?
better pizz
ehm... i'm sr, i don't agree with that
Laughs in a casual mach 2.2
What's serious topic today ?
Hello mod
Hoang Sa and Truong Sa are two archipelagos located in the East Sea, and their sovereignty is a sensitive and disputed issue among many countries in the region. Historically and legally, Vietnam asserts sovereignty over both archipelagos, based on many factors such as:
History: Vietnam has had a continuous presence and management in Hoang Sa and Truong Sa since many centuries ago, shown through historical documents, maps and management activities of the Vietnamese royal court from Nguyen Dynasty period.
Public international law: Vietnam affirms that it has established and maintained sovereignty over these archipelagos in accordance with international law, and that the use of these archipelagos has been recorded in its legal documents. many countries.
And with Chinna, claim sovereignty over Hoang Sa and Truong Sa, based on what they call the "U-shaped line" or "Nine-dash line"
So this island is is in the process of an international dispute on a legal basis, so we cannot confirm that the land is your country, even though we have clear evidence and in accordance with international law to dispute the conditions. That's still in the process of international action, so I don't agree with your statement
wow plane
hiii
If you don’t know what that is then you really don’t know what that is…. 👁️👄👁️ then you really don’t understand how sorely outmatched Russia is…
So it isn't ✈️?
What kind of plane is it
long story short, Ukraine already received the planes a few months ago
didn't notice much of a difference, or they just didn't use them
They received f15s that is not an f15
They receive f 16
so you were trying to scare me with a plane that Ukraine won't receive?
Sounds scary
I’m saying the only reason Ukraine hasn’t bowled over Moscow so we can change its name to New Florida is because we’ve only been sending fifty year old tech.
Its not even that hard apparently, the second best army in Russia managed it
Wagner
ah, i have another answer. you didn't give modern planes because you use them and if they don't perform so well in combat it will be an anti-advertisement for all modern weapons. Or you just helping Russia

No sweetheart. The F22 is so advanced, no other country on the planet has anything like it. We have a law in place that we can’t give those to anybody
in theory 
Yea you so cool, just don't show it.

hmm this minecraft guy probably won't understand and change his conservative thinking, he previously supported the massacre of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang
what?
whats topic
do you know what I'm gonna say ?
Law/Rule without Enforcement is a toilet paper
If you say that sparty island and south china sea have been under your country's sovereignty since the qing dynasty, then why can't I see it on this ancient map?
bro don't use that insulting name
It only extends to Hainan Island at most.
or I'm gonna report that
I will change it
Show me the source that proves that the whole south china sea belongs to china
not related
I changed my name
the main here is hoang sa and truong sa is a land of international justice disputes, do you understand, so It doesn't officially belong to any country yet, but why do you say it's your country territory?
Wow what is going on here
your conclusion here is not correct
So that Ukrainian was making fun of us
oh, hi~~
What is prc bro, what is that
The unrecognised country of China
Lmao
Spin? your name reminds me of.....
this is disputed waters, yes
China don’t own shit
Philippines is in the right
Vietnam is on the left
That it, bro , especially my nick is about electron orbiting the nucleus
Vietnam has left
I found a caricature from 1982
I can create something like this by AI or illustrator easily bro
okay?
idc
@feral river
I don't need any source to proof it we are the de facto owner of the sea
it was the truth not my conclusion
I didn't even stated a conclusion
truth is that's our territory and we guard our territory no matter you recognize it or not we have it and we own itthen
Haizz..
truth belong to strong one everyone
No
Sure hun.
that idea we always read on manga nowadays 🙂
anyway we should be cautious with North Korea's missle program alsao
they have nuclear weapon, they have power that all
They do have power indeed but compared to other superpowers? Nah
This is why you shouldn't let Israel hold investigations against its own soldiers. [source]
you know, we dont need superpower to become nothing, just have enough power to clear all living thing on large area, that is terrible, we all die
superpower or what that nothing , that is meaningless
@feral river
Do you support this?
world war 3 is about to start
It is supposed to happen, but north korea isn't the only one who has the power to destroy the world that's what I wanna say
we are watching war between Russ and Uka, Irag and Israel
What is the the name of the film that you are watching
Can you tell me what you mean with this gift
Israel Vs Hezbollah War LIVE | Israel Hamas War: Fresh Israeli Strikes Hit South Beirut | N18G
Israel on Monday marked the first anniversary of the deadliest attack in its history, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying the wars in Gaza and Lebanon would ensure the violence it endured last October 7 could never be repeated. Official Leb...
i dont like this, i need peaceful life
i want to live a happy life to the the end of my life
re u from Beirut?
Hello
True
That's why I think it's impossible to achieve internationalism
No no im from peaceful nation in eastern region
what
just say it
where re u from
Eastern region
Might be china Korea and Japan
They aren't peaceful at all
💀
Aight japan might be up there
At least i dont have to see they throw missle to each other like other nation like they are playing video game
That is crazy life, hell life
We really getting there
WW3
US will join this war and other european countries too
Humans are becoming even dangerous than today, humans always wanted to become greedy or powerful in any other circumstances, even though is a sad fact, soon or later we gonna auto-eradicate itselfs, due to the fact we are becoming cold and emotionless and slowly killing eachother until no one remains alive, life is not always pink as they say, because humans are always tempted to find different ways to make their lives complicated, because being peaceful and free is called weak, weak people create hard times, hard times create strong people, strong people create weak times and this cycle repeats every day, minute and second.
It's deadass hard and makes me want to jump off a building
My school is utterly crazy if they expect me to pass with no problem
then surrender
ez solution isn't it
Surrender it may sound a good choice option but is not always the viable one, Israel is keep mentioning that it doesn't fight a state and more exactly a terrorist group the hazbollah, surrender is sound too easy to say it and a state like Israel won't prefer to surrender and then the war it will continue evolve and it will be even a big humanity disaster.
Sadly, there are other deficiencies among ministers besides not having a degree. Consider his predecessor, ||Sangiuliano||, who focused on his "affair." 😑
Oh, right! He has a degree.
Well, I think that having a degree should be a prerequisite for being a minister of culture, otherwise I too could hold a similar position
I'm in my 4th year of high school rn and I don't want to go through 3 more years
And idk what to do
Being qualified in nothing can be damaging, especially if you are a minister of culture
He can have the same culture as a high school student, and if a high school boy can't hold conferences and stuff, why should he?
Best thing I can think of is filing a lawsuit
Since they refuse to label me as senior
Hominins are
And it's proof that mammals aren't truly rational besides few like the echidna
In our world we still have social classes, the low ones, middle ones and the high ones, politicians and those political high roles are supposed to be servants of the citizens, but clearly obliviously it crossed a invisible brick wall, where they don't feel they need to respond to citizens anymore, and I saw you mentioned the word meloni which it clearly may refer to giorgia meloni, which means you are from Italy and italy is known for having problem with political corruption just like my country Romania, people may trust to gain power by using unethical ways and may these ministers may have gained position through family relations, corrupt ways or any unethical behaviour, an high school boy can't hold conferences, because according to the society class he isn't a politician and politician are highly treated like some superior people, is like a peasant talking to the king when the peasant should be submissive and listen to king's order, it sounds sad but is a cruel reality, some people are becoming corrupt to gain enough power to become better and powerful than others, is a really big political competition.
The problem is that our ministers resign, we vote for them, for that government and in the end they resign, this really pisses me off
Absolutely. When it comes to prerequisites, adequate education is mandatory, but it must be combined with respect for the position you hold.
Therefore, neither one excludes the other.
Ministers resign usually when they are involved in big complicated dramas, to avoid the public exposure.
I clearly understand your message.
The fact that our minister does not have a degree in itself is irrelevant, in the end he will take it like all the others, as is already happening, but certainly my fellow citizens did not vote for him
Right, and this makes me distrust the government in the end
Clearly that minister "cheated" in his life, and gained this position through ways that should be illegal
Unfortunately when a minister resigns, it is up to the prime minister to choose a new one, it's constitutional, we cannot resort to new elections
That's why there were no riots
it may sound off topic what I try to say but Democracy in greek is separated in two words
Demos = people
Kratos = power
Demos Kratos means the power of people, what I try to say here, that you shouldn't distrust the government, because the government is technically controlled by the citizens, they need to represent, you and other complaining citizens can organize and protest and tell them your problems, because in rome era, prime minister it was called in latin the servant of the citizens, and only you and other citizens like you can change the government.
Hi!
Unfortunately in our case it is not true, because Italy is a parliamentary republic, we do not directly elect our president, it is the parliamentarians who do it, we chose parliamentarians but it isn't fair, in the end
I know, it sounds very unfair, but you can protest, you can tell your politicians, many organizations do these, even in my country Romania, they gather online and sign petitions and by usng politicians they get easier inside the parliament and things can really change
I am sure, it can exist ways to complain to change things that are unfair
only people can do this, in my country is a expression, where two people are, the power grows and the enemy gets weaker
What you guys talking about ?
corrupt politicians, political corruption in general
Brain rotting stuff
😵💫
IT can seem brain rotting, because not everyone is very open to political discussions.
✅
I don't like to talk about politics
I do really understand and I agree with your choice to not.
Let's talk about trains
I'll get headache if i talk
Me too
Lol
BTW how to check rank?
How do you determine the rationality of echidna

no I mean if you are side with Hezbollah then surrender to Israel
and don't care about your humanity shit that literally no one cares
Hezbollah doesn't care about your opinion
Autocorrect yk
they doesn't care they got ass kicked
very good
never hesitate on kill a terrorist
Discord blocked
but if they kill you first?
try
Hell yeah that's why we should kill bibi
no idea on what you are talking about, there's no any case you should justify on killing a kid
what I'm saying is no hesitation on killing a terrorist, any objections ?
any terrorism sympathizers ?
okay
Hell yeah, we should eradicate em
yeah that's it
eradicate all of the terrorists
recklessly kill them put them in charge, if we found them in toilets we put their head sink into the commode and suffocate them
💀
I hope that get better one day
do I make myself like a terrorist sympathizer ? no I'm the man who will resolutely shoot all the terrorists and put all of the terrorist sympathizers and funders in trail
Start with xi first
Apparently he's terrorist sympathizer
which terrorist ?
Hamas
Lashkar e taiba
Doesn't even consider em terrorist
The People's Republic of China (PRC) and the State of Israel formally established diplomatic relations in 1992. While the Republic of China had de jure recognized Israeli sovereignty in 1949, it eventually lost the Chinese Civil War, bringing the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to power across mainland China. In 1950, Israel became the first count...
who's terrorist?
I don't see there's something between us with terrorists
I thought you didn't see it
you wanna say we don't recognize some shit that makes us terrorist sympathizers ?
does that make any sense ?
Dayamm you're smart enough to understand my point
Thank god
Hezbollah is a terrorist group, which I can agree with, but I will come and say that Israel is ain't no saint, Israel has killed many innocent people too, using rockets and american war military machines, surrender is not a option, because hezbollah hates israel and israel hates hezbollah and no one will sacrifice to be good and surrender, Terrorists are bad, but israel is bad too, both sides have killed innocent people and by saying no one cares about the humanity part, it just shows you are a merciless I would like to call a cold human killing machine, everything that makes you human is gone, you are good to enroll in army.
correlation on your head does not imply causation
Blud your country doesn't even consider em terrorist
No one cares about your feelings in international relations
why the heck I care about it ? and does that make us a terrorist sympathizers ?
Do you consider Hamas as a terrorist organisations??
you mean we don't recognize them as terrorist group but did we really recognize them ?
wtf why would we give a shit in the middle east ?
is there any power besides Israel in the middle east
Saudis ?
Because you wanted to eradicate every terrorist
yeah that's what I wanted so what's the link between it and my state ?
Yeah apparently your country supports em
no freak
we support Israel more obviously we do business with Israelis
we have cooperation, we got companies operating in Israel
did you see any of them operating in hamas ?
Do you consider Hamas as a terrorist organisations or not??
you are asking me I would say yes
If you support Israel I'm sure you'll say yes
well yes again
I'm a sponsor of Israel
I bought their stocks, they can use my money to buy guns and bombs and kill terrorists
not pretty much but still some
wow
So not recognising Hamas as a terrorist organisations is literally anti israel
no
who the heck said that
correlation does not imply casuation
So you're saying you can support Israel and Hamas at the same time?
if hamas won the war he will support hamas
that's literally your narrative which you imposed on contradication whether recognition or not.
but recognition doesn't really a shit
especially afar of their freaking place
You should read more about international relations and geo politics
Because this statement is factually incorrect
it's just like oh it is not delicious because it looks red, then the blue one is a delicious one
that was bullshit bro
The People's Republic of China (PRC) and the State of Israel formally established diplomatic relations in 1992. While the Republic of China had de jure recognized Israeli sovereignty in 1949, it eventually lost the Chinese Civil War, bringing the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to power across mainland China. In 1950, Israel became the first count...
you better read it first we got arm trade, we got cooperations
we have companies, we have economy ties
name one we have with hamas
china ❤️ israil ❤️ usa ❤️ - russia
The way they waddle around and how they react to being filmed
While not considering Hamas as terrorist organisation lol
Blud literally put Russia and USA in same sentence
why would we need that shit ?
recognition or not why does it matter ?
will you get more money from it ?
According to bro our only enemy in the world is Hamas
🇺🇸 🇨🇳 🇷🇺 🇬🇧 🇫🇷
Terrorism is really hard to define sometimes
we are the team global powers
we decide the fate of the entire world
not anyone else.
For some it's terrorist organisations for some it's freedom fighters
France ?
It's totally based on morality of an individual
yeah that's terrorism sympathizers, good example
In my opinion, it is an expression of oppression.
And goddammm morality is subjective
in my memory you from India and you are dealing with your muslim friend in some fields and I don't see there's a potential you can get something from Israeli-Hamas war
and for moral ? what was that, can you sell it for 5 USD ?
that's a tool that authority uses to govern people
China is not innocent too
or you got private morality that was used for benefit yourself
Aah shid here we go again with straw man legend
China has both good relations with israel and palestine
Dealing with muslim friends in some fields?? Wtf that even mean lol
find something in Gaza that we have in Israel
nothing, because is destroyed
Pakistan ?
And Lebanon
oh yeah problem solved
Random
China has any good relationship with any state except for united states
even with the ex-communist states
actually..... we got a damn nice relationship with the US on commonly exploit those minor states
For me killing innocent civilians is considered as terrorism
So yeah IDF is also up there with Hamas
I don't see they are killing innocent civilians
BRO WTF
That's good then, I remember back from Donald Trump's mandate, that usa was having a bad relation with china and even banned huawei from google services, but if Is that good, it seems that usa has made good impression with the chinese authorities
if you wanna say war civilian casualties in this region or somewhere else yeah that happens, unfortunately
but there's no point to target civilians and they didn't do that
Some folks after October 7*
that's the war zone there's civilian casualties from both sides
but still no idea on bomb the shit out of those terrorists is considered as terrorism
So October 7 was justifiable because it's war zone?
Civil casualties from both sides yk
this is war what you are talking about
October 7 is the start point of the war
Of course, usually asians are well known for ther intelligence and well culture
one side declared war on the other side
this way japan genocide same think for u
Goddammmm you're obsessed with her, I've seen this ss multiple times here lol 
no idea that Japan freaking loser got 2 atomic bombs in their shithole
So yeah it was war, so it was justifiable according to your maths
Yeah killed +300k chinese ppls
well, this is a war
And u dont care
Aight lemme put it that way
What made you think Hamas is terrorist organisations??
It makes me laugh when Israel says it doesn't shoot civilians
launching terrorist attacks against a sovereignty state
they encroached their sovereignty, they rob their citizens, and they fight their army
then carrying out terrorist attacks against them
So by that logic invasion of Iraq by USA was a terrorist act??
no ? they didn't carrying out any terrorist actions against Iraq
they bomb the shit all of the region to eliminate terrorists
Seksss
We actually don't know
🤷🏼
Goddammmmit
I think I'm hot btw
I can confirm
You're the hottest person here
🫶🏻
destructive, provocative, deliberately and violently using dehumanize tactic attacks is terrorism.
idk if it's the full definition for me but that's it
and no matter it's the ISIS or Hamas, or September 11 attacks all fit on this definition
The 2003 invasion of Iraq was the first stage of the Iraq War. The invasion began on 20 March 2003 and lasted just over one month, including 26 days of major combat operations, in which a United States-led combined force of troops from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland invaded the Republic of Iraq. Twenty-two days after...
Sounds like it fit your criteria
not really
nah
What about this one
it's countering terrorism
aljazeera is sponsored by Qatar government
ignored.
🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷

When you do it it's war
When they do it it's terrorism lol
from where i see it, they are making sure the October 7 attack won't happen again, and civilian casualties are proven to be something that's almost impossible to prevent during urban warfare.
that's a different thing we never got that definition of terrorism in US war on Iraq
robbing citizens I don't think that's not terrorism
I approve this message.
yeah so kill it
I would have
kill all of the terrorists, without mercy
Before slavery
After slavery
how can i unsee this drunk bro?
I would have hit the asteroid with all the nuclear warheads possible
Blud first explain me how tf do you determine the rationality of a rat
A rat isn't rational because it's a mammal
And because rodents look hideous sometimes
aren't you rational?
Rationality was invented around 320 million years ago by the likes of Hylonomus and other early sauropsids
What about Echidnas
Nope
That's the most rational reply ever
Mammals are capable of rejecting their mammality, but it's a difficult process and most of them fail to do so
no it isn't
At least that’s not a terrorist species
Lmao
are eats terrorist species?
It has a well defined goal
Well idk if it’s a terrorist species but dog hot pot definitely delicious
U should try if you reached out in North Korea or China
probably your definition of "rational reply" should be thrown away, my opinion is at least rational.
They're nowhere near Archaeans
I still believe they're the epitome of evolution
There are a bunch of them that could qualify
it is not a stereotype?
when was the last time you ate one?
I love it
Last year
2023 November when I was in Shenyang
oh, that makes it better
Yeah they're best
Any big news in science World??
why isn't discord banned in china?
The toilet can maximumly store 3 terrorist bodies
A new hadrosaur species in North Mexico
5 if you're Chinese
https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-finally-uncover-the-true-origins-of-the-dinosaur-killing-asteroid/
It was created
Ah anyway guys
Something that feared the power of dinosaurs and wished to wipe them out
Have fun I’m gonna sleep
Goodnight
晚安
Good night
very funny. you proud of it?
Absolutely
no wonder, one of the traits of a terrorist
Na they're too muscular
We need better reconstruction
Are you accusing me of terrorism?
||My grammar is bad sorry, I'm still learning||
Early synapsids and sauropsids vs temnospondyl amphibians
Aight I've a question
Can something evolve to no longer be living??
found this on reddit
you mean go extinct?
If you mean to be dead, that's subjective because the definition of living being is somewhat flexible
Using mitochondria as an example as it evolved into being an organelle entirely depended n the host cell as an example is it possible for a species to evolve to no longer meet the qualifications of a living thing, and if so what is it considered at that point.
For example I consider viruses to be living but many (if not most) do not
Kinda
Aren't they living only inside the host
Outside they're non living
In my opinion it works like cladistics, dolphins are mammals because they descend from mammals and can't stop being mammals, same as birds being reptiles, so all descendants of the first living beings cannot be non-living. They simply will be very different in biology
So are many organisms in part, because of dead cells or minerals that cover them
So viruses might evolve from a living thing to be non living
