#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 265 of 1
idk it was yesterday or 2 days ago
Join a vc Iāll take care of it
ok but i cant talk..
Yeah Iām gonna fix that
Doesnāt matter
woooow thanks you really, i love this server
Why so serious
just ping one
hey guys
do any of you know what happend to alen g?
is he not doing his event in this server anymore?\
isael vs palestine
Palestine of course.
yes proud they are wining
Winning what?
š bro know about my 2nd move
shut up
š
delete i am just saying fact but still some people will get offended
if u dont delete then u have to defend me
Defend you?
What do you mean?
I am not asking you to define 'defend'
yes u have to protect me cuz u r my frnd
Who told you I am your friend?
You are weird pal
youre not safe around him 
why yall hate me sm

How ya?
Most definitely some cheap stuff
Right
Kinda cringe
What?
i find it best to abstain from any leaning opinion
both sides of the war have been reported to commit warcrimes
that is inexcusable
fighting against suppression is understandable until it comes to the slaughter of innocent civilians
neither side of that war is in the right when you consider the methods they use
Everyone participating in war is a loser.
i disagree
fighting against nazi oppression does not make you a loser
d-day veterans are not losers
unless youre not referring to war as all war and just mean the israel-palestine war
where still, i would not label everyone a loser
Well, yes but everyone lost something. I think what I wanted to say was rather, in war there are only losers
that may be until you remember that the losses they suffered
were incomparable to what the axis regimes would have imposed
the ethnic slaughtering
I think you may have missed my point or maybe I am poorly choosing my words. Everyone will lose something in war, no one remains unscathed
This is what I was trying to convey
i consider there to be winners in wars on case by case bases
in the sense that
you may have lost things or people, but that doesnt make you a loser when you weigh it up against what was prevented
you did lose things, but you gained other things
such as a continued freedom or perhaps even a continued life in the case for jewish people that survived ww2
for a loser to be a loser, i think they should have lost more than they gained
and keeping your own life and freedom is immeasurable
I think many people actually lost their will to live as a result of what they had to endure during war
many, but most were relieved they were not subjected to horrors beyond comprehension
ill use the nazis as an example
no freedoms with millions culled and a loss of individuality led by a deceitful, censoring, oppressive regime
thats what was at stake
the war was awful, but id weigh it as a win for the allies
what they prevented was more than what they lost
i definitely understand where youre coming from, but i still think there can be winners
I see where you're coming from but I also think that measuring if you lost or won war highly depends on the events one had to go through. It is possible that someone belonging to the "winner" faction has lost everything in a personal way (e.g. family, money, will to live etc.)
It is hard to know exactly
those who considered themselves to have won at the time were the vocal majority so one can only assume
even if they lost family, most saw it as a necessary and acceptable loss that led to the 'win'
I wouldn't say necessary and acceptable. Who thinks it is "necessary and acceptable" that your mother, father and little sister have to die, slaughtered before your eyes to stop a dictator ?
As you said yourself, life has no price
So how can you say that some lifes have to be shed to overthrow a dictatorship. How cab it be necessary or even acceptable
meaningless diplomatic threats wouldnt have stopped the expansion
what is the other option
what other way could you have saved millions more
Then this becomes the big philosophical and ethical problem - are three lives more worth than one ?
You surely know the airplane example
the nazis killed 1.5 million jews a year alone
I don't know the answer but it surely is a difficult decision
if the holocaust kept up, twice as many people would have died up to now. the war prevented a consolidated nazi rule
and i see that the war as necessary to have prevented that
we tried appeasement with czechoslovakia, then they went for poland and france
I understand your point of view. Still, is war really the only viable solution?
they are not "worth" more than one in a monetary sense, but in an intrinsic ethical sense, yes
yes, you cannot please a bloodthirsty dictator
Strong opinions
as stated, we tried pleasing him
we gave him a country, we didnt bat an eye. all we said was dont invade more countries
what happened next, the invasion of poland, the killing of millions of poles
I know about the appeasement politic. But I still wonder, is war the only solution ?
thats what started the war, the nazis culling populations without instigation
it was the last solution
if you sit back and let a dictator take your continent by storm
you have no respect for your nation or people
no metric would have satisfied hitler until he had europe and its colonies at the bare minimum
hi
I respect your opinion and think it is great to be so sure about something so difficult. I still remain sceptical about war as the only solution and the worthiness of lives.
the only other solution would be to have no war, let him lay siege your nations, let him kill potentially tens of millions more than the war did, let him take your freedoms, let him take your individuality, let him take the rest of your family because "they had a big nose" or wore glasses, or had brown hair, let him finish the nazi development on nuclear weaponry and let him destroy the planet. thats frankly how i see it
if you see worth in life, morally, you would choose the option that preserved the most life
and by all predictable measures, nazi occupation of europe, or even the world (which obviously wasnt going to happen due to the war) would have killed more
But did they know they would win the war ? What if they lost ? I don't think the decision was that easy to make. And even less if it was the right one to make
nobody would know theyd win
the whole point is to fight for your country
to save your country from horrors
far worse than war
Right, so it was a wager. A wager with lives.
would you rather the world burn
I don't think you can say something like this. What is war ? war has many faces.
what do you mean
war is a militaristic and violent diplomatic dispute
you fight to prevent the worst
you dont fight to kill. you fight to prevent more from being killed
unless you are a nazi, they fought just to kill.
I wanted to say that you can't generalize war. You can't say something is far worse than war, as war has many different aspects and is different for every single human. So the horrors of war can and were worse than the other options for some
(i am not calling you a nazi, im just using that in the 2nd person)
There you have to differentiate between those that were Nazis because they believed in Hitler and his propaganda and those that were forced to commit heinous crimes
the war resulted in 75 million deaths, nazi continuation has been calculated to result in up to 120 million people losing their lives
do you not see those 45 million lives as being technically saved
Yes, but (being blunt) I don't think that mattered much to the 75 million dead
that doesnt even factor in the technical innovation that stems from war
option A: 75 million deaths
option B: 120 million deaths
unless you can list another alternative, there was no other alternative
either you fight against it, or let it happen
We come back to the question if you can compare lives. If you can say that 120 mio are more important than 75
no diplomatic pleading would have stopped it
on a moral scale it is obviously worth more
I'm not that sure. But I think it's a really important and interesting question.
And I am glad to hear your thoughts
you either lose lives, or you lose more lives. thats how i see it
and the loss of life that was prevented, i see as a win
just imagine if the nazis finished their nuclear weapons program
the world would be cooked beyond belief
likewise š
True, but on the other hand, can you really compare lives. Maybe one of those 75 million was 'worth' 100 lives. In the eyes of family, the dead surely had more 'value' than unknown individuals.
"Bent was his bow, the Grecian hearts to wound;
Fierce as he moved, his silver shafts resound.
Breathing revenge, a sudden night he spread,
And gloomy darkness roll'd about his head.
The fleet in view, he twang'd his deadly bow,
And hissing fly the feather'd fates below."
one life is one life. one person is not worth more than another
no matter their achievements or qualities
if one is one. 120 milliom is 120 million and 75 million is 75 million. and therefore 120 million is bigger than 75 million. and therefore a 120 million loss would have been a bigger loss
My honest reaction 
Poetry reader?
My mean teacher is forcing us against our will to read one of the most epic and gorgeously-written masterpieces of all time
one is not more than another one. but 120 million is more than 75 million in the same sense 2 is more than 1. life is just quantifiable per the person in my eyes
You can't say how much a live is worth.
no i cant
but i can say one person isnt worth more than another
i dont care what theyve done
a life is a life
Okey that's seems interesting
Depends on the perspective, I guess. I mean theoretically you are maybe right, but try to explain this to an orphan who just lost their entire family.
š i am fk proud of u i had debate about this sm and never heard an answer like this u r 101% right
Finally found the answer?
i would see my perspective as an unbiased view, without personal strings
yes johnyyyš«¦
The worthiness of life is highly individual and something that, in my eyes, isn't countable or rational.
on a personal level itās obviously down to how they feel. but on a factual level, they lost less than they couldāve. i will forever see that as a win
Or thy should make yourself better?
i can and will confidently and rationally compare the losses of 120 million possible lives against 75 million lives and consider the result of less deaths as the more beneficial result on an omniscient scale
the omniscience being a bit metaphorical in the sense of just knowing the different outcomes
I understand and respect that opinion. But I'm not quite sure if I share it
Only ww3 can get a billion
itās always back to the trolly problem
three men are strapped to a train track
a train will drive over them in a minute
if you pull the lever, the train will divert onto another track with one person
Why you repeat over and over about 75 and 120 where is those numbers from especially 120
He explained it above
pull the lever, save 3 lives and kill one. or donāt pull the lever, 3 people are killed, but was it you?
the rate of nazi slaughtering for a continued length
1.5 million a year they killed
Pull the lever kill 7 billion or 5 billion
on the orphan question
That was the problem I was referring to. It is indeed a very difficult but thereby also interesting problem.
I want to say thank you for an interesting and still respectful conversation !
from earlier
What would you chose on the orphan
i cannot cater to that. they lost their family, but imagine the many more families that could have died
if you wanted that person to feel better and you didnāt have the war, if you kept their family
i will stay on the hill that i believe it would have let more die
the inaction resulting in more dying. or the action resulting in less dying, but also resulting in involvement
no problem i love having debates/discussions
if i may i should probably go to sleep anyways, i have to wake up for school in 6 hours
lovely discussion, i might be back tomorrow š
Have a good night!
have a good day/night too š
Then what would you sacrifice
What do you mean ? You seem to throw in interesting sentences and questions a lot
if countri surrender and fewer people die, should it surrender to the enemy?
In the orphan question what would you sacrifice
I hope I never have to make such a choice. But I have to ponder more about this question
What about you ?
I would thought about it, image along no family what's there to lose
why married with cousin is allowed in islam ? inbreeding
Ye causes biology problems
damnnn
Well?
this was done by the phopet so muslims must be following it
Yep
speechless.
Try process it
I bet they have story behind rules like that.
where is the story written?
u r my frnd from now
Okey
I don't know. I don't even know what country's law you're showing.
bruh u are defending thisš what story can be behind this
You annoy me.
country's law its islam law
And? He can't marry twice at the same woman if she doesn't get married after divorce, a bit weird rule, but nothing extra.
brainrot rule
I bet they have story behind that law, it might be part of tradition, religion stuff or just something happened.
Or old Arabian traditions
it must be written somewhere
cuz anyone can make random shit story and prove this shit thing right
I don't know about their legislation, but in Russia some laws were formed centuries ago, they gradually change, but not always on time. And it might looks weird
mhm
the percentage of people who are bothered by this law is so small that I don't see a problem. Tbh
Even more, I see the benefit of it, a person will be more responsible about his marriage
ok um sorry i am gonna take a ss of thisš
Yes it is but it depends on which one and I can say it cause biological problems so itās not favorable
ik this things are wrong
It depends in every religion and how you understand things how it works
so u are justifying inbreeding?
Bruh Iām not justifying it
I told u it depends on ur religion and the way u think
If u feel that thing is wrong it is logically
And if u donāt u donāt
What is wrong is wrong. If people in some community think that inbreeding is right then their thinking will not make it right it will still remain wrong . Everyone knows that killing innocent people is wrong, but if a certain community thinks it is right then it will not make it right, it will remain wrong. so stop defending this shit written in islam and giving illogical reason
if some people think its right then they have to change thier mindset
Perhaps you should recognize that there are those within every culture that partake in this behavior.
White, Black, Asian, Mexican.
You make it sound as if this were something condoned in only this one specific culture, in one part of the world.
Forgive my impertinence but if I didnāt know any better, I would think you were trying to attribute some sort of immoral and bestial nature to those that practice Islam because a some few in that demographic practice that unfortunate method of reproduction.
Of course, you wouldnāt be so foolish as to claim they do it more, as the practice is far more documented within Catholic societies, particularly royal lines.
okay nale
nale answer my question why do muslim get offended whenever anyone talk about this?
i didnt mention that this thing only happen in islam
more than half population are muslim and this type of things are written in their holy book it will ruin their mindset. why are u getting offended? dont u think this thing written in a holy book are wrong?
I donāt think thereās any group or community thinks killing innocent is correct
But some people providing taxes, fighters, stick in the grounds and provide shelters to their enemies is definitely not innocent
its just an example to prove that guy wrong read all chats
morning
guys,When you learn English, have you ever encountered a situation where you understand the words but not the meaning of the sentences?
I donāt think we should ever contempt the influential degree of Islam itself, it is the second popular religion in the world, it has rich history, faith believers, they can have potential
I cannot speak on behalf of Muslims as Iām an Atheist for one. But I can say that the implication you make by pointing out that their holy text permits it is strikingly obvious.
I can point to a number of distasteful behaviors in any of the Abrahamic faiths, or any faith for that matter.
But all we need to do is to know whatās the most beneficial way to deal with Islam for our own interests, some way can be simply contain or discourage it
Personally I would discourage all religious institutions as a whole. But thankfully I donāt have that power.
Thatās depends your own stance and interest ofc if u wanna say oh no thatās part of the freedom we donāt need to do anything to them then see how they assimilate progress is going
Make a lot of sense, then I think China is your ideal state now lol
bud no offence but i dont take atehist srsly u are atheist and defending a relegion where inbreeding is allowed but also in the text u are saying u discourage all the religious institute. make a clear decision of what u want its provoking u cuz u also know its wrong i can point out what ever i want
You mistake my condemnation of your intentions for a defense of their faith. There is a difference.
very common. you understand sentences and how words are stringed because you're used to reading things
i dont think they understand this
Its the āif youāre against me you must be siding with everyone else thatās also against me,ā mentality.
that and language constraints. you're too fluent for them
There is a plurality to this dynamic that is not they arenāt understanding. More than two factions, and its not as simple as being against everyone that isnāt you.
what do u want i mean i shouldn't talk about this type of practice?
Okay š
Perhaps address whether or not it is actually practiced, encouraged and to what degree.
Seek to understand before you criticize
We need confirmation romaboo
with the way you approach his arguments and how hostile you seem to be in deflecting constructive replies that you only interpret as meant with ill intent because you're not intellectually equipped to compromise with social diversity, yeah youre not cut for it
I wouldnāt go that farā¦
He sure isn't cut for it
This is true. You were only āgayā if you were the submissive one in the relationship.
Moreso than it is today.
True, homosexuality was present with the greeks
But the CCP suppresses ANY religious movements
nah, he withdrew himself so theres that.
As you wanted to make every religion disappear lol
Cuz we are a on-path socialist state
Petition to bring back the roman empire as our first step towards a one-world-gay-government?
True homosexuality
why don't we kick it up a notch and establish a worldwide bugis gender society
At it's finest
as far as im concerned public bath compliments and secretive pederasty are acceptance /j
Who is that
Not good ngl
I š³āšā¤ ROMAN TOWEL BOYS š£ļø
hence the /j
also good luck, youll need it
As a Gender Abolitionist I cannot agree

Okey, pass it
I do not see a man, nor a woman, I only see the beautifully perky and round bottom before me š
Ass is ass
fortunately for you said society accommodates the transition to gender abolition
Then donāt participate š
We shall abolish gender
Good,
Abolish the chains of gender!
I would say the situation may not come to be plural but the result came out might displays they are from a single prominent factor defined by Mao called prominent contradictions
That means Iām not required to get the freaking everything figured out but solve this issue everything will be settled
I mean if anyone is going to take over the world itāll be after The US Russia and China turn it to smoldering ashes
Actually if you know a single thing too better you might have a higher chance to make mistakes.
Dude you may fluent and talking circling with it around everything you think but one single point is clear that you canāt twist
At least to me
France and Britain will be offended
France is too busy trying to recover from the economic devastation that was trying to clean their river for the olympics. And so long as the US exists Britain is vying for second
Theyāre basically posh americans with, somehow, shittier cuisine than us
Britain I would consider thatās another American proxy like in Japan they use Britain to project power and control the European influential expansion
The only expanding europeans do these days is VIA excess calories
I would say EU is a potential opponent of the US
Europe cannot be united again
That would be a catastrophic to US-led global order cuz they already got a China and Russia
I wonder how could you add some fake words makes you a little bit professional ?
I kinda want to learn that shit
Like how could you say something in addition of virtual word components in the sentence displays you are a professional ?
That really makes me a little bit professional but I hate it
I kinda in favor of American way of speaking
huh?
no offense and this is most likely me being too textbook but the way you structure sentences confuse me š
No bro, I just donāt understand why would you say āthis is most likely me being too textbookā instead of āIām too textbookā
How could you just add some meaningless words in one sentence sometimes makes me confuse
There is no literal meaning for add that stuff right ?
I donāt think I usually make confusion to people by English but itās obvious you are on the higher ground about languages but I donāt understand why talking in a confuse way
I will feel uncomfortable to read that sentence because thatās the way I have never seen and I think it was used for focusing how good English ur
I was like what the heck dude u donāt need this much like that
None of the words I used were fake?ā¦
because they meant two different things? if i had said "im too textbook" that wouldve been a direct admission of my tendency in processing informations, which i'm guilty of in a lot of cases because neurodivergence makes me struggle to read between lines, but the phrase "most likely" was used because i wanted to assure that it's not just my innate reading difficulty that made your sentences hard to parse. i wanted to make sure i wasn't the only one having a hard time understanding your disjointed texts
how could you assure that you are not the only one by "this is most likely me being too textbook" ?
like is there any relation between them ?
that's...what i was trying to do š
dude that doesn't even make sense I think
who can get your point by this ?
btw what texts of mine being disjointed if I would like to ask ?
and none of the words me and nale used are meaningless. this is me being blunt, but you lack the linguistic aptitude to understand words means things and they're utilized to specify context,
I don't think in any circumstances you are required to be blunt not clear, and but you lack the ability to convey the correct meaning to the readers
is my point clear ?
maybe you need 3 lines of words to say something about this I only need one.
and I need to read all of your lines of words to wonder, wtf ur talking about
that's what I mean
I don't there's anyone having a B2 degree don't understand what im saying
nale would like to add some words that's okay at least she didn't twist the meaning
but sometimes I really get lost from your texts also once I tried to put your text into google translate it didn't even come out a correct sentence
im not in the mood to argue, but you've told me this mutiple times, in your characteristically vague way, that my tendency to overelaborate out of the compultion to make sure none of the things i said gets misinterpreted, gets in the way of delivering concise points worth engaging with. i'm very self-conscious about that and it's a major thing i've worked on fixing my whole life, because it plagues my native dictions aswell.
but i don't twist meanings, and i certainly have no targeted intention to obfuscate my arguments just to domineer over the people i talk to with my intellect or some shit, i take huge offense to that.
yeah many times as you said, and about meaning twisting I think you really need to check what you have said or it's suspcious maybe you didn't do that but when I'm reading your text that appears your intention was to twist the meaning then I put your texts to translate it didn't comes out a proper sentence.
maybe that's my bad but you know even in a translate software doesn't have the ability to know what you mean
or if you don't understand, I would say It's your intention to you are talking in your way to yourself, not convey your meaning to other people
so don't think we don't understand your word because we are lacking of linguistic aptitude, I also take offense of that
it's obvious I don't give a fuck
okay i'm actually gonna leave it at this since you're being dense anyway: im unassuming of people's capacity to discuss and debate in this channel, i lay out my opinions and arguments the way i do because the channel facilitates an atmosphere for sensibility and i try to respect the search for intelligent conversations by putting up one, which is also what i seek in this channel. you asking me to tone my superfluousness down, if it ever exists, is a suggestion i highly consider
but you do need to work on your aptitude, otherwise you wouldnt have said nale was using "meaningless words" despite him being very clear š
I always think I need that, thank you
and about superfluousness thing, well at least I confirmed you know that, that's all enough
In China, if someone publicly speaks ill of the CCP, will that person receive the wrath of the people or do they simply not care?
religion is far too inherently flawed
justifying morality through scripture is dangerous
especially when some scriptures incite their religionās followers to take part in hate and violence against others
morality is derived through the individual not through religion as commonly used in debates for religions
they are institutionally harmful for the development of humanity and cause billions to deny, without reason, the origins of the species
wow how enlightening
Yes, although the people couldn't directly elect the emperor, so I would say it was a sort of elective oligarchy
I LOVE PARLIAMENT ā¤
As far as my limited understanding about Islam, the wisdom behind the rule "a man cannot remarry a woman whom he divorced twice, before she marries another guy" is to teach him a lesson about the seriousness and sacredness of marriage relationship. There are cases in which it is very easy for a husband to divorce his wife and regret it later.
well if police officer is nearby you will immediately go to the office and they will told you to not do this and if you promised you don't do it you will be freed.
it's not even a crime or something they will just consider this as disturbing social order like shouting around in a public area
if you don't talk about Xi jinping just shout in a public area you also will be in the police office.
well I think there's 2 type of moralities, one is private morality (ē§å¾·) which is a general criteria of measure to preserve your own interest, and the another one is public morality (å ¬å¾·) which is used by authority to set a couple of standards to regulate other's actions.
one is used for defend your own interest, like there's a wallet on the ground and you decide to not to take it because here's a camera on your head if you take it, you might get in trouble
one is used for authority to regulate people, like we need to know that something not belongs to you, you have to return it to the original owner
one is in order to preserve your interest, one is in order to regulate other's actions.
What the hell happened here
This is some serious chet tbh
@feral river maybe you could sum up the discussion so we dont have too read all of this
...or you could maybe read it and thereby better understand his arguments
me watching someone get cooked for an opinion i lowkey agree with
that's just a real case of discussion if you want to sum up that, you are welcome
just compile everything into chatgpt and generate a summary
hi anyone here š
no one here expect me
just ask what is difference between doctor and physician i know it's the same meaning but who is better to say it
Phycan ?
phycan and doctor is the same meaning
but who is better to say
The only thing I could find that has the name Phycan is Physics of Cancer
I don't think Phycan exists as a word
dude translate it and you will know what " phycan " means
Can you show me the definition of "Phycan" then ? Preferably from the Cambridge dictionary
Also, this is not the appropriate channel to ask such a question. Go to #šļ½english-questions
sorry its a physician not phycan š
thanks dude for advice
isnt phycan the bird
sorry i mean physician not phycan

one's a level of university degree, the highest there is, the other's a medical profession. when comparing the two in a medical context though, people usually use the second term to refer to specialized practitioners in medicine the way surgeons do with surgery
@rotund venture
Bruh go to #šļ½english-questions
physicians brew and assign your meds based on your prescriptions, basically
guy was asking a very short question, let him be
He asked the same in the appropriate channel. Maybe answer there ?
Why not here if the damage was already done
ok thanks dude so its better to say doctor
my answer wasnt interrupting anyone or anything now was it
Those with notifications on will be very upset
there's no "better" way of saying it, there's however situations to use the term properly. you use doctor to refer to any medical professional casually, whereas you use "physician" when you talk about people adept in making and designating medicines
i muted this server tbh
hell i even muted this channel š
Not even the mentions?
I mute all non-mentions no matter the size and activity of a server
wait you mean pharmacist is physician
becouse they do the same thing " about people adept in making and designating medicines "
I suppressed all in the second category
right, pharmacists make your meds. physicians usually assist them and provide general roles. idk man its useless semantics and no one actually uses the term physician
ok dude thanks for tell me that
the server luckily doesnt abuse the first @s so i havent had to turn it on
is this chat only talk about serious things?
Yes, as explained in the description
If you believe that sauropsids are a serious matter then yes
name's for display only, in reality this is the only channel you can send paragraphs on because people here (are conditioned to) bother reading them. most of the time they just duke out on useless things like pretending to be intellectuals over newspaper politics the way old bald dads do over cups of bitter coffee
Fiscally responsible
haha so it just copy pastes word channel?
no
you're not a bot right?
i typed all that and your first thought was i was a bot how more human do i need to speak
hello, my name is zafer. i want to practice in level B1. help me please š
im sorry i think u jus copy the chat š
uhuh
Ig they often take it as a personal insult, if you bring it just for I dunno no reason
Even if it's exmuslim and you just start talking about that stuff without any particular reason it might seems you playing "oh look šš are you guys really doing it ? š² You too ? Wow my culture is so superior in contrast to you š"
In that case it's kinda understandable, but still one always has to control oneself's emotions I believe
Russia is not capable of competing anymore, unfortunately
Region power, but not in the world stance
It's the US, China is also a regional power
No matter how their economy and debt-trap policy are strong
Damn if you think Minecraft's English is not good enough, what do you think about mine ?
thatās what i particularly find interesting
the case for religion often argues individual morality would not have existed if not for the religious principles of civilization.
they argue that we would not have any right or wrongs if not for religion
i know this has some overlooking but id hurd religious followers into 2 categories
non dogmatic and dogmatic belief
and dogmatic belief is quite frankly harmful
you have the more spiritualist people, they donāt try impose their own ideals upon others and they derive their belief from within themselves
or those in the dogmatic category that often end up denying others with a clear lack of respect, something directly against their religionās ārulesā
hence why scripture is so dangerous
humanity has to accept religion is a means of cushioning the reality of life rather than using it to push lies, deceit and hate. referring especially to islam on the hate part
Ah
seriously?š
@austere dagger
So as per me size matters
But I hv smol
So I m sad
I am 5'5
That's too big

I wish I had it
You mean tall?
Why do y think size doesn't matter
Idk, I think so
Is it like 160cm?
Mine is 5 in sadly
167 or 165 something
5 what? Bananas?
At same skill then it does matter, but mighty mouse took down a bigger guy
Does it matter?
Whats your weight?
So motivating
Not bad
Thx
I am so insecure about my pp size u motivated me
You can also search "saenchai" a small fighter but KO bigger opponents
Fr? My friends are all taller
Ok senseii
Go bulk up, then you will be bigger
Let's say it's in the global average
But will girl be happy that's the question
With peaks in Europe and some areas of Africa
What if I only grow horizontally lmao
I see, sad
It also depends on how old you are
I'm 19
Still big, tbh "size" is also decided by weight
Am I cooked
Yes
I see :((
In some cases, growth ends at age 21
Depends on their taste
Where are you from?
Thx
Pakistan
I hope my 5 inches prove worth
Not bad for that country
Girls are of my size at least
Are you of Punjabi ethnicity?
Nope, gilgiti
I didn't know this ethnicity
It's in the northern areas of Pakistan
From Gilgit Baltistan
I searched on the internet, they have very European features
hmm interesting
Which features to be specific?
Blue eyes or light skin
I saw some pictures on the internet, I don't know if they are reliable
Yes, there are a lot of people with blue eyes here
And light skin too
Is there someone I can go to talk about religion
Hi
It's primordialism, not eugenics tbf
im here too
where is that chini dude
I'm a primordialist but I don't care about eugenics
I just believe that reptiles and mammals are innate unchangeable ethnicities
And do Chinese people get angry when someone speaks ill of the CCP?
Helloe
When they do something good we appreciate them
When they messed up we criticize them
Can journalists criticize them?
in vietnam yes, there are students who won first prize in a very famous knowledge contest stated online sth like that "The Communist Party of Vietnam is shit" and as a result he became the focus of criticism and abuse all over the internet.
and he was taken to the police station and as a result he was ostracized and isolated by everyone in his school.
Oh
too bad
Poor lad
Punishment for spreading the truth
https://youtu.be/kmYdpHtOv_E?si=6u0W_CWWMaNKNZug
@feral river
Over the past few decades, China has solidified its status as an economic superpower. But the countryās economic boom coupled with its increased military might has increased tensions in the region, including with Taiwan, where fears are mounting over a possible Chinese invasion.
Meanwhile, at home, Chinaās human rights record remains under the ...
Absolutely no, cuz they will lose their job if they do that
Only lose their jobs?
They may not facing any prosecution but they will lose their job certainly
Yeah
Ah, I thought it was a matter of life or death
We are not under a totalitarian government
Actually a kinda symposiate Chinese mate in the beginning
Fair
Hmm???
But sometimes I wonder if dictatorship works in the long term
Even in some timeline in Chinese history like the cultural revolution if you said something wrong they may criticize you and force you to wear a sign and go street to make a confession
And state how wrong you have done
I mean, It is a system that hinders the "natural selection" of government
Truth???
Well most of human history almost in all society people lived under some kind of dictatorship
I am living 22 years with same government in Turkey no thanks
I donāt know which one have been natural selected but obviously we have that potential to select other systems
Cuz we are damn successful
Even today democracy and so-called hybrid regimes are only 50% of countries
hmm, authoritarian or dictatorial government
Yes you can, but imagine when your government is no longer liked by your people, another bloody revolution will break out? Another fratricidal war? Better not, better a democratic system
Well one may argue that dictatorship is an invention of the 20th century u know, but I hope everyone got what I meant
Works?
Is Erdogan's government working?
Can you defy what u mean when you are asking "works"?
From an economic and qualitative point of view, does it work?
Unfortunetly yes
Well, if that is your question, so yes
Sometimes democracy is actually bad for economic growth, like in your country
What do you mean by unfortunately? Are they achieving their economic and foreign policy goals?
What about the Italian economy for the last 10 years? What about how much you are spending to pensioners and have a really low fertility rate
Our economy is growing, fortunately we have not been in crisis for a while. Democracy is an unstable system, but when you choose the right government, everything works wonderfully
The expenditure on pensions in Italy accounted for 16.8 percent of the GDP in 2019
The government is making reforms to increase births, for pensions it would be enough to privatize them
Well, I can't be happier with how the economy is doing right now
We have a higher GDP than Russia despite having less than half of its population
It couldn't get better than this
Ik, just comparing
The economy of the European Union is the joint economy of the member states of the European Union (EU). It is the second largest economy in the world in nominal terms, after the United States, and the third largest at purchasing power parity (PPP), after China and the US. The European Union's GDP is estimated to be $19.35 trillion (nominal) in 2...
In recent times we are one of the countries that has grown the most
I couldn't be more proud
really ? If you say Economy is bad you're going to Silivri (to the jail) I have been looking for job for 3 years and a few days ago 8 years old girl losted own her villages everybody searching 19 days and There was a publication ban on the new from government finally 2 days ago they founded but she was dead villages people was silent
Well, other European countries are not doing any better either
Declining fertility rate is typical of rich countries
They spent less on pensioners and kinda more willingly accept migrants, don't they?
And we were talking about democracy
When people have greater economic awareness it is difficult to encourage them to have children
Pensioners are most likely against pension reform and against migrants
So the situation could get worser and worser
Well, they don't want immigrants, so they'll increase the birth rate with policies that benefit families
That's what I meant when said that democracy could be bad for economy
And it's 2012
I just don't get it that you will always consider government is doing something not for the interest of majority of people, how they gonna maintain their authoritarian rule if they didn't gain major support by people or people hate them to be the ruler ?
recent FAIR popularity survey in 2021 shows 91% of people supports CCP's rule in China
Because there will simply come a time when the interests of the majority will become those of the government, which can sometimes prove to be disinterested in the needs of the population. This has happened in Russia, China, America, France, Italy, Spain, Greece etc. A dictatorial government cannot survive forever
throughout the history of CCP, I didn't see there's a moment they lost majority's support even it's at the peak of great leap forward and cultural revolution which killed millions of people
Yes, this may be true, but how long will it last?
Human beings need changes, it's in our nature
In China, 5000 years history, we donāt have an western liberal government ever
Indeed, how many bloody revolutions have started then?
Despite we got the century of humiliation because our leader chose to close the country to the world and we are lagging behind on technology but thatās still for the interest of majority of people and stability of the regime
You canāt even count
My speech was focused on the non-survival of dictatorial systems
But every authoritarian regime established after, they tried to avoid such mistakes that former government have done
Yes, but there must have been other revolutions, up until the last one that happened, the communist one, but the question is: how long can this non-democratic system survive?
And how many generations will be lost to future revolutions?
Thatās matter ?
I donāt see we care this point
They could be your children, or your grandchildren
We really donāt have that western morality or personal freedom something
Prypiat
So ?
You mean we established a democratic could avoid the civil war?
How we gonna deal with Americans then
The chances would be drastically reduced
What do they teach at school about Tiananmen Square in 1989?
As I always said there is only one chance that we annexed the entire world then establish democracy
Nothing ever happened
Democracy is a system that allows your enemy to exploit you
Maybe he can't even see the message through the firewall
Nothing ever happened
But I support that decision by Deng

Thatās what he should do
Lmao but for real, is it mentioned and how is it described?
Actually people support the act by CCP in Tiananmen Square
I talk with a lot people about this
I'm always amazed at how people get hung up on one episode, it always looks very strange, as if there was nothing before or after it
First you gonna know we donāt mention it or teach it but it doesnāt mean we donāt know it
We have much to learn about your culture, and I hope that one day you too will embrace ours too
We know it in another way, thereās a lot of stuff cannot be taught in China, but we learn them from discussion, internet and other stuff
Chinese internet is not as oppressive as you imagined
Otherwise you wouldn't be here telling us about it
Well the main contradiction is, democracy is a system that allows your enemy to exploit you
That will never never never happen to China
Give me a practical example
If you want šš»šš»
I agree, democracy is the people governing. but people are stupid, at least most of them.
Good afternoon
This is why the parliamentary republic exists
Good afternoon to you too
Its a good thing there are no direct democracies with any real political power
Thatās a lot to say but letās me say it in this way, do you think itās matter that other countries influences comes into your country?
Do you have that sovereignty above everything?
They got caught and shut down
Well, this is globalization, it is an inevitable process
By who
That they need to keep making agreements among themselves, in the dark. To arrive at something.
It was genuine curiosity, I wanted to know if it's taught at all or if it's a myth/meme. Apparently not
Natural social development not by any one group or person
Thatās not globalization, thatās Americanization
You have a distorted idea of democracy
Thatās what I need to clear
Your global order, globalization is based on the United States
One of our biggest potential enemy in the world
So it's akin to underground information?
Itās no difference that you guys can ban TikTok because itās a Chinese app, that you guys need your network sovereignty
Thats just a representation of the fact that America has remarkable market power so its inevitable that our culture is spread to the places we interact with
But we already censored everything you guys do in our sovereignty network environment to make sure you canāt do that to us too
Having the same political system does not mean having affinity, for example our government is not at all friendly to the American government and we have challenged it several times
Heās actually admitting to censorship now?
Oh cool then I would say we donāt give a shit to that we will not let you in
You are the enemy in our geopolitical vision
We need to contain you, thatās what we do

Which country are you from?
Hello lmao
Like for me, I don't care if you mentioned it or no.
Heās some West Taiwan
We always do that
why you think we need some Americans to mess up and spy in our internet
Well, it is, for now, but what if you decided to cooperate so that you have free competition?
Do they teach about the 1993 coup in Russia? How is it described?
When itās globalization by China not the US
I will say something unpleasant, but without that event, perhaps today would be a different China
Most countries have one event that is taught in a particular way, my country too has at least two of those
You and I both know its about keeping unwanted information from reaching the public because freedom of information would destroy the one party system
Free competition, what a joke when US stole technologies from Europe and when they rise up they say they gonna protect their copyrights
It could happen if you cooperate
I think the country that provides the most freedom to its people is the USA.
China stole half its designs from the US for military tech. 
I would say thank you we will continue to do that 
Do they teach about the Libyan genocide in Italy?
And thanks for Israeli selling your stuff to us
Imagine being so inept you canāt make your own military tech.
If so, then why cling to cases where a country did something bad?
No, not even the genocide in the Balkans done by us
Maybe in the future
I think, tell me your options.
But till now wmds is all enough
For them nothing ever happened
Donāt test our sovereignty lol
1989 isn't the worst thing that happened in China, I think you're aware of its meme-like status. I wanted to ask a Chinese citizen about his experience with the education system
Gay stole rainbow
We donāt test you guys sovereignty but it seems you guys are trying to use any chance possible to test us
No wonder Taiwan wants nothing to do with China
Thatās Republic of China
And Peopleās Republic of China
Different state
But the same people by blood
But China, and we signed one China policy in 1992
1992 consensus
They left yaāll years ago and you keep pretending youāre still a couple.
Idk do you want war ? I donāt think we want that
They pretend to be the same person
Taiwan is running if it depends on the US
Donāt test our sovereignty
No thatās why we support Taiwanese sovereignty
It's a case of inverse multiple personality disorder, where two personalities pretend to be one and that the other doesn't exist
It always amaze me, people who told what other country wants. I bet you have no idea. Did you do social research and ask people what they want?
You can support
But things will not going to be what you are supporting to
Yes only 12% of Taiwanese actually want their country to rejoin China
Amongst elders there is a significant wish for union with the PRC but most youngsters are the opposite
My best friend is from Taiwan
Well actually we donāt care that much
We both are restrained on this point and if they really do something like independence
How do you know that? Who make that research
We will just put our mighty army above them
Taiwanese domestic polls
Nothing with your opinion or something
Even if so, who cares
Guns is everything
Who strong take their land
When a gun is above your head dare you can say something bullshit
They didnāt want it so they left. We support them
What about young Chinese mainlanders? Do they wish for union with Taiwan or not?
Where are you from?
Finland
And they will be happy, china show research where 99% approve it
China only wants it back because they want the factories their that produce microchips because their engineers canāt figure it out
We all support reunification for sure but some people doesnāt support to take back Taiwan by force
They want peaceful unification but I donāt think thatās possible
Russia's neighbor
And North Korea
Yeah if they try to use force Taiwan has the USās support
Then letās do a crazy war
I doubt you know anything.
You think ur the big boys v
There already put our Find Out over they and your navy fled
Interesting perspective
Iām too
I don't think that's why.
Donāt test our sovereignty everything can be settled in a peaceful way
Thatās what we are doing, thatās what US is doing
They have Germanic blood, Germans are warmongers by nature į
Ya China can leave Taiwan alone and no one attacks anyone
The wish for union with mainland China was very nationalist in nature, but since Taiwan stopped being a dictatorship and nationalism decreased so did the sentiment
I want to die in war so bad
US leave there or WW3

See if itās WW3 as I said if war breaks out
Never test our sovereignty
I advise you learn something about how outclassed the Chinese Military isā¦
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinas-hollow-military/
I bet you ā¬5 it will be WW3
I donāt need to really lol
Since opening its market, I encourage capitalism haha
How much do you bet?
Nah bet bottlecaps, itāll be the only viable currency after ww3
I donāt want to give out bunch of useless articles to show you how American military works
We will see.
Such a Mexican standoff
We got a lot of fallout community in China
Fallout reference?
Nothing ever happened
I have no idea why you guys think you think you can do anything to us, judge us
When talking about why we canāt democratize
I think it's taught but I'm curious about how it was perceived
I would like to ask why donāt you guys surrender to China then
If Russia gives the image that it won this war, Europe is only in its own hands.
Thatās the same thing
The only country I'd surrender to is Estonia
I'm not judging anyone, sorry If it seemed that way to you
Because unlike mainland China most of our internets arenāt limited and we donāt fear out governments if we decide to do independent research.
No I just think itās a normal discussion then nale comes here say how terrible we do and saying we gonna have a fight or something
Why?
If you want a fight we can do that
You mean we canāt do that ?
What you are even talking about
The CCP is known for arresting those that have a different opinion or start poking too close to information that makes them look bad.
Proof
This is another bullshit
Best Baltic country
Sigh Iāve given you proof before and you just ignored it. So Iām not sure why you bother asking at this point
And Finland?
It's cringe
Hear, if you donāt like me you can just say it you donāt need to be like this, and about CCP arresting people on different opinions I will tell you Iām pretty angry with CCP when they doing something during the Covid
I talk with everyone if they talk about CCP politics and I will say how bad their policy during the COVID
And even Great Leap Forward, cultural revolution, tiananmen massacre something I all recognize thatās truth
If Minecraft stops replying here we know what happened
If you think thatās not enough for arrest me what you can arrest them for another reason ?
One thing that was strange to me about Estonia was the blonde girls who dyed their hair black, and you could see the blond regrowth
We will rescue the supreme leader or the nuclear response will be unavoidable
Even my friend is a member of CCP
Lol
Goths are popular there
Like you are really talking in a way of prospect by western propaganda or something idk
Not the real situation in China
https://hrf.org/reports/ccp-100-years-of-suppression/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_China
https://www.aspi.org.au/report/suppressing-truth-and-spreading-lies
https://hrf.org/programs/ccp-disruption
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_to_Suppress_Counterrevolutionaries
Censorship in the People's Republic of China (PRC) is mandated by the countryās ruling party, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). It is one of the strictest censorship regimes in the world. The government censors content for mainly political reasons, such as curtailing political opposition, and censoring events unfavorable to the CCP, such as the...
And the shopkeepers laughed at me when I spoke š„²
Holy
Why is that
I was speaking Italian and the girl in front of us started laughing
Many shopkeepers in Tallinn can speak basic Finnish, I recall having them initiating the conversation in Finnish
Those alien Indo-European languages sound funny
Anyways the US Presidential debate is tonight
But the thing that made me laugh the most was Kik in de kok
Do u know what u have said
The truth
It sounds so bad
Is it another first part or what, how does it even work
The government has censorship over all media capable of reaching a wide audience. This includes television, print media, radio, film, theater, text messaging, instant messaging, video games, literature, and the Internet. The Chinese government asserts that it has the legal right to control the Internet's content within their territory and that their censorship rules do not infringe on their citizens' right to free speech.[3] Government officials have access to uncensored information via an internal document system.
Itāll be timed
And this is the context from the information you provided
I would say LMAO
What a difference
That castle was so big
I guess Germans are to blame for that
Germans and Denmark made sure that us Finns wouldn't be able to rise up again
I was sweating after that visit, and sweating in Estonia is not that easy
Each candidate will get opening statements and individual time to answer questions on policy
@shy summit do u still remember that guy from Tibet ?
With a kik in de kok
How does it work? Do they keep offline copies of the censored info or is it akin to a key that lets them access everything?
So similar to the Biden vs Trump timed debate?
Same rules
Well no generally they have an algorithm to filter the information comes out
What time is it
From the Greek, strategy LMAO
Can I watch the live on CNN YouTube? Idk
I set an event for when the debate is supposed to start
But itās not being directly administered by government but by certain platforms by private companies following the rule by government
Weāre gonna stream it in P&R
I see, thanks
All different platforms have their own system of filters
Like how YouTube filter the racism , terrorism stuff how bilibili filter the anti-government stuff
Thatās literally the same thing
But not being operated by government officials
So freedom of speech, thatās shit
I need to ask you this, do you know ē±ä½ ē©å幓?
Doesnāt really exist in any place
Whatās that
Search on YouTube 
This one be crazy tho https://chinadigitaltimes.net/2021/12/the-ccps-willing-influencers-amplify-state-propaganda-online/
This week, a slew of new reports on Chinaās online propaganda campaigns was released. As researchers documented, the CCP is increasingly using foreign influencers to disseminate pro-China narratives on Western social mediaāparticularly regarding the crimes against humanity in Xinjiangāin order to increase engagement and defend against foreign cr...
Average Chinese
Well you donāt need to use that narrative
I already explained a lot of times about this issue
Yeah but others should see it too. Best to guard against disinformation by informing people about such campaigns
Well thatās not even a case
Much like the Russia attempts as of late
Do you like some CCP propaganda?
ę¬ē讲述äŗę大å¦å®æčļ¼åäøŖē·ēä¹é“ēē¬ćéęÆćå„å¹»ēę„åøøēę“»
åę äŗē¤¾ä¼ēē¹åę½®ęµļ¼å¦ēēēę“»ē¶ęåę ”åēę“»ēē¾å„½äøå¤å§æ
让ę£åØē»åę ”åēę“»ēēč§ä¼ę¾å°å
±éø£ļ¼č®©ę¾ē»ē»åå¦ēēę¶Æēč§ä¼ę¾å°å¾ę„ēēčæ¹
å欢就订é
äøäøŖå§~
How long have you guys known each other here?
Some months
Iāve been here for some time
I donāt just want to spread some bullshit in here like you informing other people for some bullshit
But if you really like it, I can play it in your way
šµ
If you want
Dems do it better
True
I have never knowingly and willingly spread disinformation here.
If something is incorrect its because I missed it, and not because my intention is to lie.
The Taoiseach of Sealand supports the Democrats! (I am the Taoiseach of Sealand)
okay then I will show you some real information
Just know I will check the source given our history.
åØäøå½ļ¼å®Ŗę³ē”®č®¤å ¬ę°äŗ«ęčØč®ŗčŖē±ć ä½čŖē±ęÆēøåƹēļ¼å ¬ę°åØč”使čØč®ŗčŖē±ęå©ę¶ļ¼äøå¾čæå宪ę³äøēå ¶ä»å 容ļ¼å ę¬é¢ č¦å®Ŗę³ęč§å®ēå½å®¶ęæęå¶åŗ¦ļ¼ę害宪ę³ęčµäŗēå½å®¶ēć社ä¼ēćéä½ēå©ēęå ¶ä»å ¬ę°åę³ēčŖē±åęå©ļ¼ęé ęč ęŖę²äŗå®čæč”诬åé·å®³ļ¼ę ęä¼ ęč°£čØļ¼ę°ä¹±ē¤¾ä¼ē§©åŗēć
In China, the Constitution confirms that citizens enjoy freedom of speech. However, freedom is relative. When exercising their right to freedom of speech, citizens must not violate other provisions of the Constitution, including subverting the state power system stipulated in the Constitution; damaging the national, social, collective interests or the legitimate freedoms and rights of other citizens granted by the Constitution; fabricating or distorting facts to make false accusations; deliberately spreading rumors and disrupting social order, etc.
Do you think the internet should be a lawless land?
Yes, I have no doubt that is the optic story and likely close to what is written on government documents.
When the CCP officer hits you with the äøŗäŗŗę°ęå” stare
Doesnāt change the fact that despite this claim and likely this legal text, that actions have been taken beyond the implied good stated here.
Aierken Tuniyazi, male, Uygur, born in December 1961, postgraduate of the Central Party School, member of the Communist Party of China. Currently serving as deputy secretary of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Party Committee, chairman of the regional government, and secretary of the Party Leadership Group. He has served as deputy director and director of the party and government work department of the autonomous region, deputy position of the work department of the autonomous region party committee, deputy secretary of the prefectural party committee, commissioner of the prefectural government, member of the standing committee of the autonomous region party committee, and vice chairman of the regional government.
Textual claims, and actual practice are not the same thing.
the leader of Xinjiang Uyhgur autonomous region, is a Uyhgur
I agree.
Yes, and there is still a genocidal practice happening in China.
@thorn lagoon After the edits on hyperborea, I also got the edits on Yakubia
if you enjoy it let's have more
After the so-called "Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act" was introduced by the United States, the United States and other Western anti-China forces put pressure on some companies in the world. On January 27, at a press conference on Xinjiang-related issues held in Beijing, Ilijiang Anaiti, spokesperson for the People's Government of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, responded that some anti-China institutions, organizations and politicians such as the US "Congressional-Executive Commission on China" (CECC), Amnesty International, and British Conservative Party members have publicly put pressure on some multinational companies on the grounds of "forced labor" in Xinjiang, inciting these companies to withdraw their sponsorship of the Beijing Winter Olympics and suspend the use of Xinjiang-related products or related business dealings. Under the coercion of these anti-China forces, some multinational companies have made different choices. Some respect the facts, are not afraid of hegemony, and continue to choose to use Xinjiang-related products. They have not only obtained legitimate interests, but also won the support and praise of Chinese consumers; while some companies have ignored the facts, followed the trend, removed Xinjiang products from the shelves, and suspended trade, which has been firmly resisted by Chinese consumers.
The anti-China forces in the United States and the West have openly put pressure on relevant multinational companies, forcing them to take sides on issues related to Xinjiang, in an attempt to tie these companies to the "anti-China chariot" as cannon fodder. This has seriously violated market rules and business ethics, undermined the stability of the global industrial chain and supply chain, disrupted the international trade order, and harmed the interests of related companies and workers. It is an extremely shameful act. Faced with a complex international environment and pressure from the US government, the best business strategy for companies is to respect facts. Only business decisions based on facts are most conducive to the long-term development of companies. Multinational companies in the Xinjiang-related industrial chain and supply chain are welcome to come to Xinjiang for on-site inspections, make prudent decisions after understanding the real situation, and are willing to share development opportunities with all multinational companies that respect facts and operate legally to achieve mutual benefit and win-win results. (Reporter Wang Shibo, produced by Wu Rui)
btw why we didn't have that in english
that is not how freedom of speech works
you either have it or you dont. you cant have some of it and drop the rest
So why did you forgo mentioning what happens in the Uyghur camps?
this is not how your freedom of speech works
You mentioned other events surrounding the USā objections but not that
chinese citizens are subjected to a narrative that benefits their government
this is how our freedom of speech works
i do not have freedom of speech. i live in england
Oof
cool, we have freedom of speech I live in China
do you live in the prc
we don't need that western fake freedom of speech
Fake?
yeah ofc
proceed and say xi is an atrocious leader on twitter
ill see you in a camp next week
pay me 5000 bucks ?
are you afraid to do so
pay it I will send you my bitcoin account
and you will see the messages on my twitter
its quite humorous to see those under heavy propagandist views to blame the west of propaganda when they are being directed away from an ethnic cleansing by their government
you wanna have a free service but I don't provide to lol
5000 bucks, deal it or not ?
a free service what are you on about
youre asking for an obviously substantiate amount because youre scared to do it
do you think i care about your offer

freedom is not subject to nitpicking
do you think i care about your bullshit ?
you have it or you dont
dude i dont care what you care about im mind moggled how brainwashed you are
I think the point is youād be taking a substantial risk Mine
the point is youre scared to do it
So I wouldnāt recommend it
dude I don't care what you are care about lmaoooo brainwashed ur
the point is you wanna do a free serivice I don't provide to
hop off xi when youre done
LMAO keep yapping
5000 USD, wait don't you have it ?
no i am in full time education
im sorry that's so offensive you don't have 5000 USD
really sorry for that lmao
I can't even hold my iPhone 15 I feel so guilty
oh I will got 16 after it was cames out
quite hilarious how the one talking about the west being fake decides to blanket their quite frankly disgusting animosity
dude 5000 USD isn't that much for english ?
idk if they are poor
maybe you are poor
are you going to keep going on about your offer
Wtf is happening
is this all you have to say
idk if you refuse to pay it
do you not have an actual point
do you not have an actual argument
5k USD is 35.6k Won
I have one pay it then
you started this let's go, pay it
what did i start
I think mine missed the point
you cant prove you have freedom of speech
you know what did you start why would I freaking care
youre a thoughtless moron
who are even you
grow up

