#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 227 of 1
I know more history than ur entire age
reality is sour
Boiling in this oven called Egypt
BAHRAIN
Wat word?
ohh
Yes so that they are specialŲ© ŁŲµ ŲØŲ§Ų³ŲŖŲ®ŲÆŲ§Ł
Ų§ŁŁŲ§Ł
ŁŲ±Ų§
Therefore, you must sanctify them, for they are the best of human beings and those whom God Almighty has chosen, and let us follow their example, and we follow their example, and worship God as they worship Him. This is a lack of reverence for God, and your saying this word with us is that you do not believe in God and in what was revealed
I can't sadly
Ų§Ųس٠ŁŲ§Ų³
Yet people are not serious
But they are the best people in the world that the good choose him they are the nearest peaople from the good
We don't need to insult people to be serious as someone called @whole beacon
U just shut up.
Okay
Well, I'm sorry then
I'll buy you flowers
May I ask how old are you sir?
Well sorry too.
Know how to talk properly.
21
good morning
Okay
Good morning sir
Nice
what abt u?
how are things?
Hi Domino, can I get your pizza?
Well, 17
no
Your glorification of them is a form of glorifying God and glorifying what they brought from God
REJECTIONNNN
pizza denied š«
Have you ever killed a cat?
Ohhh u minor
But Egyptian
same
ya ofc
But you can imitate them, follow their path, and do what they do. This is why God sent human beings as messengers so that you can do what they did and follow their path, which is the correct path that will lead you to Paradise
Welcome sir, are you Italiano?
no I'm from a country which borders Germany and Belarus
You said they are not special and i say that they are special
Are you moslem?
First are you a moslem
habibi I found I am gay when I slept with my girlfriend, she smelled like rotten fish
Ok they such as any human but they are really special
U people 17, which means you are a snack

u hot boy? I would fly down to your country for a ons
No they are the perfect of the paople
speak gibberish doesn't matter
ur place or mine?

Ok i advise you to change your picture because i thinked that you are not moslem from your picture
u top or bottom?
brother shut up
why don't you just let me bend over for you
allah hu akbar
librarian in chat
Please give an insight to us about the research methodology to be used
what happened babygurl
u tell me about the research methodology first
I mean the picture you put in your flag is a strange picture
the way a research is done
Yeah
all minors in chat, that's sad
brother I from bahrain english little little
my native mauritus so arabic very little
Hi guys
heyyyy
baby boyyyyyyyyyyyy
how is your mommy
?
andy how is your daddyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
!!!!!!!!!!
do you know any 6 and 9s'/\
srsy. borin
so who do u support?
israel or palas
??isint it to old a convo'\
Dear Members,
This chat is intended for serious discussions and educational content. Please refrain from indirect or direct insults, demeaning expressions, and ad hominem attacks. For constructive and respectful conversations, avoid unfounded labeling and inappropriate remarks
im sorry but what is that flag ? Gaza province of Israel ?
seems pretty weird that a provincial flag would be more unwaverable than state.
You forgot the word encroached. Let me help Palestine, which is encroached by Israel.
š
How can I help?
Mental health is an integral component of our overall well-being, yet it often doesn't receive the attention it deserves. Despite the advances in understanding and treating mental health issues, stigma and misconceptions still persist. This can prevent individuals from seeking the help they need, exacerbating their struggles.
The consequences of neglecting mental health can be severe, impacting every aspect of life from personal relationships to professional performance. Mental health disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder, can be debilitating, but they are treatable. Access to appropriate care, whether through therapy, medication, or support groups, can make a significant difference.
This doesn't even make sense
They eat this in China
Ask the Chinese girl here if you don't believe me
Now days its has become too common. we don't know who is really depressed and who is just saying for attention.
It's a country which been occupied. Looks like you're a child and didn't hear about something called: Occupation or Colonization.
Humm I see there is Hamas occupation on Gaza province of Israel
And muslim colonialism against Jewish state
Toddle knows nothing about history. Just search about Isreal and see the declaration time.
I donāt if there is another sovereign state besides Israel in that region
Only state of Israel
And the history you own the land doesnāt mean you own the land right now
Even landlords knows how ownership works
And how it can be changed by guns
Not gonna eat this kitty it barely has nothing to eat
It's very thin
How do you cook cats?
And itās not worth to do it because it also has risk to get sick
We only eat unusual meats in restaurants
Itās 100% safe under government regulations
..
Like dogs cats donkey etc.
Idk I never cook that
I never eat cat actually I didnāt try that yet but a lot of donkeys and dogs
Dog hot pot is just delicious as hell
Then you're saying that we should surrender to the present case, right? I doubt that you'll apply the same rule if a country colonized China. Which actually happened! And Chinese people fought the British!
And the flag clearly says that the Palestinians are older in this land and have many roots in it.
Unlike the western jews that claimed the ownership and declared it by powder.
Hi
In my opinion Messi is the greatest player of all time
Hmmm.
In terms of achievement, Messi is the GOAT. But I prefer Ronaldo over Messi.
Hmm.
sorry bro, i'm not interested in chess
Feedback?
My heart ache for the recognition I didn't get,
For the love I didn't feel, for the words left unsaid, For the laughter that could have been.
I spent nights crying hopping You'll look my way,I listened to break up songs and I relate,For me it was about us,Not about lovers but about a kid hoping you'll look his way too.
U so bloody oblivious to geopolitics
same
What do you guys think about the dark forest theory?
Whatās that?
Does anyone wanna play chess
on lichess.com
some blitz mabye
https://lichess.org/dvDI3Zgd
here is the link if you wanna play
and mabye we can hope on the gaming voice channel to talk while the game and analyse the game afterwards.
tag me if you wanna play
Join the challenge or watch the game here.
Hello guys, THIS IS NEITHER PALESTINE, OR UKRAINE, OR ISRAEL, BUT IT DESERVES EQUAL ATTENTION AS THEIR COUNTRIES. Yesterday Venezuela had presidential elections which were fraudulent, the population percentages indicate that there are a total of 123% of voters, people who do not exist. Yesterday, many Venezuelans stayed until dawn with bullets and threats defending the witnesses at the table, witnesses who did not want to let them pass and now many are being persecuted. But after the false defeat, now it is different because we have IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE, we have 40% of the letters revealed by the opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, the woman who was arbitrarily disqualified and for this reason we follow Edmundo GonzƔlez, her right hand and really winning candidate, we have videos and witnesses who affirm that nowhere in the country did NicolƔs Maduro win, we have videos of ballot box thefts by armed hands of the government. Yesterday, there were deaths, injuries and kidnappings. We need this to reach everyone. We achieve a lot alone, but we also need the international dissemination of audiovisual media. This has already happened in Venezuela, we have already come out of things like this, a long time ago a dictator committed electoral fraud and 17 days later there was a coup d'Ʃtat. We will be free, help us by spreading the videos, let the world know that this bloodbath is not over!
Let the courts figure it out.
Me
Let's playy
Today 99% of people who say they're depressed are just in bad mood. The real depressed person doesn't want to attract attention, they just want to d.ie and forget about everything. This mental disorder can't be cured by motivation or others support or help. Depression can be cured only with suitable medicine and nothing else. Sometimes even medicines can't help and such people just sui.cide
Depression is one of the most terrible conditions of human
Iam in depression from last year now I have started the medican
How old are you my friend
I am 17 but it's our genetic
Hlo
Good luck with that my bro
Hi
How are you
Thanks
Hello
Hello

Well please understand suitable medicine can mean anything from CBT to SSRIās depression is not a one size fits all illness.
Depression is very broad a term, as many things factor into it.
Usual mental health gatekeeping
as someone who has battled depression and suicidal ideation since i was a child, it's not a 'bad mood'.
It comes in different flavors and levels of severity tho.
as does any mental illness or even physical illness
Hi
Im the former Invictus
Who wanna be friends with me
Dm me or add me
Also I'm learning English because I am beginning in it
i'm happy to chat with you and answer questions
Depression exists only during procrastination. Next topic
I think depression is a normal process
It personally goes like this for me, my life is more like a cycle first I make a plan after studying my situation and that plan is made to accomplish few goals, after carrying on with the plan I encounter variables that i prepared for and others that I didn't predict which alters the path I drew for myself, after a while I get a feeling of displeasure if the results isn't the same as I expected before coming up with the plan or I wouldn't have an expected feeling and reaction to the result I wished for, if that happens more than once and it gets piled up, I lose faith in my own planning ability which causes depression for me, I lash out at myself and blame it for the result that aren't always in my palm to begin with, during that I immediately think of an alternative, a change wether its in my planning or behaving ... it has to be a diffrent approach so that I don't have the same failing result and the cycle repeats itself
not only is that a lie, it's a hurtful one
I'm speaking from my own experience. Whenever I set my mind on my goal, I feel no depression. When I'm stressed, I know that it's my time to perform.
Maybe it happens when people drown in this life and their only goal is to get more things from this life, when they take the life too serious. maybe being crazy is the solution for it. Idk
Thatās the dumbest statement ever made
And he thinks he ate
Way to downplay a serious health issue in the world�
Your own experience does not speak to the greater whole of the population, nor can you attest to someone elseās experience. I find it to be extremely distasteful having not only weathered the illness myself, but have had my family impacted by it so soundly as to warrant time in psychiatric wards.
The only things you demonstrate with such commentary is not that depression is easily conquered, but your callousness towards others and your inability to exercise sympathy.
Depression is over-diagnosed nowadays because the pharmaceutical industry wants to sell more.
Speaking from my perspective as someone who's been treating it for years
That is true, that doesnāt make depression nonexistent, or that all cases arenāt genuine.
Of course, mine for instance was (or is) true. But I've seen several people that honestly don't need remedies for that
Why does Sweeden sell too many antidepressants if they're considered happy
Happiness is not the absence of sadness,
What do you guys think about women empowerment. Like can you define it in simple words?
Thatās a slogan created by liberal feminism to sell corny t-shirts and crappy films
As Simone stated
Lmao, my english teacher is a feminist. She always gives this kind of shitty topics. Now, I gotta prepare an assignment on this in 500 words lmao
You can nail it
You can talk about Foucaultās theory of power
And argue that giving power to women instead of men wouldnāt change anything about society
Yes, can I put it like this that women empowerment is not about giving women the power. It is about giving them a choice if they want to be a homemaker or work as CEO?
What am I supposed to write on the topic women are better than men in every field. Like bro wtf is that topic. What am I supposed to write š ???
Wait there. Donāt forget to say that we should end a structure that provides power of a certain group over the other in the first place
Noted.
And they face sexism in work too, specially in those male centered jobs
I'll cook something, thanks for the ideas
What should I do about this š ???
Youāre welcome, good luck!
Honestly I would challenge my teacherās views
I have a good quote to state why women stay in the house
Nothing is that simple yk
Women have a logical reason to be housewives
I would argue not for power, but emancipation
Freedom
And that cannot be done in this system
Sure, I have repeatedly challenged my teacher, and each time she awarded me a D. My entire grade is being destroyed by this instructor, and I'm at my breaking point.
Because capitalism is rooted in patriarchy
Damn
Thatās so sad
I've tried thatš
I mean we can have different views on something but that doesn't mean you can ruin a child's carrer just because your views are not aligned.
Nahh, she's very toxic š
Most arguments people use to attack Christianity are either fallacious or hystorical inaccurate
According to her, women are still suppressed. Men should be assigned to the kitchen, and women should labor outside. What kind of sick mentality is that?
Thatās stupid, it literally does not change the current structure. You can argue that studies concluded that couples who both partners work outside of home are happier
Itās not only good for the relationship, it also puts them in more safety. I mean, women are more susceptible to domestic violence bc they have no control
Noted.
Christianity is the only religion where women are actually seen as holy and have important roles in there. Furthermore, it was under Christianity that women had the most advancements in Europe's history (compare to how they were opressed during Pagan times)
Damn, that's a good point
They literally burned women and called them witches
Lmao no
I can give you references if you want
Loll the church only condemned these women. They were executed under secular rule. And I want to add this was an exception
And seeing women as pure is also detrimental
Yes, please it would help me very much
Weāre not pure, weāre normal human beings
Exception lmao. Burning a person alive is no exception, it's sick mentality same as toxic feminists
The church fought against heresy (that was growing too much at that time), Aryanism, Catharism...
But we can't abstract some ideology or something out from the material society it comes from and then take it as the only things that decide a social phenomenon .
āonlyā it was thousands of innocents women
The French revolution alone killed more people than the insquisition itself š
Very few compared to other massacres in human's history.
Can you provide me with the exact number?
Your political ideology killed way more (and Idk what that is)
the Religion has a long history,From the feudal society to capitalist society,it have the different essence in different era,based on the different means of product.
Mutiny cannot be compared to burning women alive.
Women of learning mind you
The number of women r**ed by the Soviets on the post-WII was was way higher than the number of women killed by the Church
The church at the time was about maintaining power, and women breaking that mold threatened it. Knowledge is the natural predator of superstition.
Knowlege better yet is the natural predator of systems of abuse
Oh really?I remember the Soviet Union is the country that legalized Abortion right ,And give the public health services to the woman from working classes.
(I can give provide you with examples of how bad women were seen in Ancient Greece, for instance, and how it improved after Christianity. Same with most European countries)
What is my political ideology?
Where are you getting these numbers lmao, can you provide me with an article that has covered this?
you mean Athens
Ideology never killed. But misguided underlearned children prodded along by people in power kill.
That still doesn't mean you can just go around and kill innocent people.
And Given that your viewpoint you may don't know in the early era of the bolshevilks They also endeavor for Woman's right But they Want the Dedication Of the unity of class struggle and The emancipation of woman.
I never said could.
I never said should
It was an understanding of the why not a reason to
The Greek world in general. Simply skimming over an Aristotle's book gets you a hint of that
You can read Their viewpoint in the book Written by Alexandra Colenti
Yeah I know, ancient greece was horrible
with women
but specially Athens
The modern era might have given women more rights, I can't deny that. I meant, from the Ancient Times to the Middle Ages, no one it gave women several rights they did not use to have
anyway, letās talk about christianityās views on women, elaborate on that
letās talk about the present
And there's a myth that says they accepted homosexuals more than today's world
aye, i can add that lmao
Ok
oh yeah I think Foucault addresses that point in history of sexuality
I have a problem with Foucault due to his views on kids
wait What,I can't get your point.Do you mean in theAncient times to the Middle Ages,religions Do favor in the protect or establishment of Woman's rights?
heās a very controversial figure, not a big fan of his
but his view on power is dope
Yup, Enlightenment too
post structuralism is very interesting
Yeah, if you trace a line from 1600 to the Roman era, for instance, women had loads of advancements, especially when it comes to being viewed not as mere objects for reproduction but as important people for the constitution of a family
the figure of the mother is merely a creation
they created the myth of maternal instinct
calling the labour of creating and taking care innate to women
I would like to disagree with this point. Women did not have loads of advancements and they were subject to the authority of a man.
and that puts women like me, who donāt want children, to be judged and dehumanized
From the childhood, this power was in the hands of their father
Feminism also were responsible for addressing how r4pe can regularly occur in marriage
And be overlooked
As if itās the duty of women to please their husbands
In that way, she is an object
Also, women slaves were called ancillae who used to live in inhuman conditions.
Noted.
Women are allowed to be sexual without ever having a sexuality
Therefore sheās an object
Only to be looked and used
and subject to the authority of a man.
Great point. And r4pe is also a war weapon
Men use r4pe to state their power over women, as if theyāre belongings to the men of the nation
Exactly
Europeans used to kidnap and r*pe competitor countries' royal women, didn't they?
The christian guy disappeared lol
Bro got cooked lmao
Yeah
Damn⦠sexism really is the eldest form of oppression
Yes, lmao
Studying social sciences is so depressing lol
I was way happier studying space and planets
Nahh, social sciences are so interesting
It's horrible I'm telling you š
Really?
yeah
At least we can argue online
Yes.
I see ,But is such kind of phenomenon Still exist when it comes to class of Slave?
I would never pursue it because I have no talent for physics
Even tho i'm not an social science student, but i still like to read and take part in arguments.
Plus even tho social science is sad, thereās something so beautiful in people fighting together
I study something in between social sciences and biological sciences
Good becasue it gets horrible the more you study it š
"My enemies enemy is my friend" lmao
Ohh, that's great
Oh yeah we won then what about you guys ? Fighting a pointless war and suffering your own people.
Lol yeaa
I still remember when I was in senior high school,I even can't get half of the marks of all Science Subjects
that's so horrible
Idk geopolitics, all I know is I donāt support a loser
you should become self taught
But things goes reversely When it comes to history, English, Chinese, politics,And other things
I'm already depressed from Science and then comes my English teacherš
So I am a typical liberal art studentš¤
I only started liking science when I started studying for myself
Physics is all about your Imagination
but when I need to solve a problem my imagination is wrong š
Deduction is so hard dude
Lmao so true, it just fades away š
Interpreting the evidence is a talent
Yea lmao
Me too bro, I just accepted that I like it way more
š¤WOW
āWeāre poor but weāre happyā
Different countries different cultural background, but We all don't like science
Lmao
Another powerful Evidence of The possibility of the unity of the people all over the worldš¤
Well is science so damn hard than you think ?
Do you guys have psychology as a subject?
Unity for the death of science
lmao
Yeah
I never had it in school but itās my major š
Do you like it?
It's horrible. As a science student myself, stay away from it š š
Hummm idk but I think science is fun anyway
I hate the subject like Maths From the every fiber of my body
I still use my fingers to count
Yea, my friends from arts blabber about it all time. I started reading bout the human brain. That shit is too deep asf.
That was too personal š
Wait till you get know that physics is an umbrella term š
Thereās something so attractive about being our own object of study
hahahaha
Yea, found it interesting
Typical different kinds of Chinese student
Maybe ur right š
I think they donāt even study liberal arts
It was a fun talking to you guys 
Oh
Itās math science math science chess
In fact I am a Chinese student
That learning label art In My senior high school
And in my college
Either ping me or DM me if there is any political debate going on 
Graduation May means unemployment for us lmao
I met a girl here who said she had no choice but study 10h per day bc of the educational system
I felt so bad for her
Oh
Same here lol
Where are you from,European country America?
South America
.or
Brazil
Oh
Oh yeah
Thank god I study for intrinsic motivation, otherwise I would be really depressed
And if you want to get a Job in the government or National Industry,It is impossible if you don't Have a father or relatives Who works in it
oh
that's great,Far more better than me
Donāt you have exams to enter the government jobs?
I just endeavor for a higher Possibility of a stable work
nope,I am too young for that
Me too bro
But some crazy parents Think so
I would probably study really hard for a āgovernmentā job
Do you plan on leaving your country?
Impossible for my families Classical financial situation
With a good education you can leave for study/work
Yeah
That means to be the slave Physically and mentally
We have no scape really
Or you are a damn The new generation of exploitation classes
Yeah,But that is impossible
How could The historical event happened that in a so called socialist country Who in fact Betrayed its past But now be Destroyed in a revolution just like it do in almost one hundred years ago?
I didnāt studied Chinaās history
But it seems to me that this so called socialism is just another form of capitalism
I go for anarchy all the way but Iām not really sane
Yeah
The thought has always been criticized
Two hundred years ago, it is Marx and Engels Who criticized it,One hundred years ago it is Lenin and Stalin,Fifty years ago it is Mao ,then All of them Passed away
yeah like stalinism, state-capitalism
or socialism with chinese characteristics
exactly it's a combined system between government planned economy and market economy.
we kept 5 year plan and capitalism market at the same time
And after Mao,Everything changed
the communication between us is so tankie- style()
well Mao don't really good at ruling the state but he's good at to fight against enemies
he's a legendary leader for China and also the founder of People's Republic of China
he bring Chinese people out of authoritarian backward being colonized with full of foreign powers and occupations.
Didnāt they slaughter civilians or something
I remember something from contemporary history period
for what š¤£
clear out the opposition political power ?
they did that and it was failed.
I wish I could recite Chomsky but my book is in portuguese
Censorship
Even in the so called the center of the democratic and the words of freedom ,I mean America
These things still exist.
hummm idk why some people think a lot of people died in certain period is just because they want to kill those people.
Maybe you could try to read Lenin's book
I tried reading āwhat to doā (I think thatās the translation) but I need a lot more historical context
I will get back to him one day
about how capitalists lose to communists
š¤£
It is the war that recreated and reinscriped the bolshevilks and The future of soviet Russia and revolution
I need good references bro, the only guy in bookshops is this american revisionist professor
I need at least a leftist author
Maybe The ten days that shock the world byJohn Reed
You could also use the internet
I remember there is English version Internet That has marxist work
But whatever you read.
Please do not trust the yapping video on the YouTube.
Donāt worry
I was socialist before I was anarchist
I know how ideological most materials are
hahaha
Btw thereās a site with marxists work for free
Itās called marxists.org
Really good site
Congratulations
Im going to use to read more of Zizek
WOW, that's a very fashion philosopher
Idk if heās controversial but his takes on cinema are really good
Heās a superstar in philosophy
But in recent days i am Reading about Althussur(If I spell it correctly)
I spell it wrong.oh no
Iām reading a lot of Neil Postman to see if I get less addicted to social media
Marxism Is a kind of anti humanitarianism,He said that
Gosh, I hate that -ism!
Ooh
And in fact he doesn't mean he wants thousands of slaughters.
Was he?
I think you gotta be a bit naĆÆve to be a humanitarian but idk
That does nothing good for the development of the Marxist theory
WHAT?!
I was looking at Ode to Joy for a school project some time ago and this random dude came on YouTube,
Wait, are you talking about the concept of human nature, right? Which is a myth
And he yapped and yapped nonsense on Ode to Joy. š
Or it sounded like that, at least.
LMAO
He said this mainly in opposition to the prevailing humane Marxism of the time, such as Lukacs and other Western European Marxists who argued that Marx's 1844 manuscript was a truly Marxist work and shifted the core of Marxist theory from the productive relations of production to the abstract man
From 'the Pervert's Guide to Ideology' (2012)
Being a musician (ish), I can confirm!
It's just so beautiful, and I'm not even the biggest fan of classical.
Heās on the set of clockworking orange
This movie is hella creepy and thereās a lot of beethoven in the soundtrack
Anyway imma watch it
Oh?
All I remember is him yapping nonsense and being funny in that one.
I love the Ode to Joy a lot so I prefer to have my own interpretation of it, but I've read some interpretations on it, though.
Just amazing!! š
Thatās so interesting, actually
Sorry to join in but I'm actually curious.
ā Abstract manā I wonder what he means by that
Are you guys talking about Marxism?
Donāt be sorry, youāre more than welcome!
Plus you just showed me an amazing take from Zizek lmao
It's actually a matter of my own wordsļ¼sorry about that
Is this on Marxism?
It's better to say The narration Centered us humanļ¼but not the productivity.
Yes, he uses the marxist conception of ideology
Oh, I meant the discussion here. Sorry!
But in this take he is analyzing how ode to joy is used in a clockwork orange
I am unfamiliar on it but I understand communism...
Clockwork ORANGE?!
Oh, just that.
Thank goodness he did not interpret it negatively!!
You never saw/read it?
Some might say I'm being overoptimistic or even ignorant, but that's how someone I know moved away from a loss. No drugs. No prescription. Just keeping your mind preoccupied all the time
Yup, we were talking about socialism and marxism
Itās a very interesting dystopia about morality
I never heard of it.
Not a fan of communism or socialism, however.
And talk therapy is one option, yes. But mere severe cases require intervention at a more fundamental level.
I am a capitalist, as one should be!
Youāre kidding! Well, try one day. Itās about a young violent psychopath who is submitted to ābecome goodā via psychological experiment
That sounds like the end of Nineteen Eighty Four...
Oh my, room 101!
Another Classical work
2 + 2 = 5, Winston writes in the dust as the sunlight hits the desk.
Oh yes. It's very, very famous!!
Always be reinscriped to anticommunism
Itās a very different dystopia, everyone there is corrupted
Itās way more about the nature of violence and morality
Yes..! But who knows, perhaps not everyone is.
And why do you defend this system?
But to me it just seems like the majority are being controlled. That dystopian piece still reminds me Nineteen Eighty Four's end!
Because it uses one's own selfishness to provide for society. It is more efficient, and it brings competition and in the process, creativity!
Well, itās hard to tell. Nietzsche argue that morality was created by aristocracy to condemn rebellion and power
oh
"It is not the benevolence of the baker or the brewer..." that one has food on the table, but because of their own selfishness.
For God's sake,Another classical words
Oh, my.
Yes! It is really nice, The Wealth of Nations.
There is nothing nice,At least from my viewpoint
In the book?
That's fine. I haven't read it...yet!
Dogs eat dogs,or poor Goes to the hell, but weathy do well
i mean cap
This is one major problem w/ capitalism.
It aggregates discontent sometimes & there are problems with mass capitalisation and ofc, human behaviour.
Dude I donāt even know where to start
Me too
We can start anywhere! In high school they don't teach you a lot about it.
Looks like that You stand with the great thought In eighteenth century
I'm always open to re-evaluation, ofc.
Capitalism is not perfect but out of all the horrible systems it is the least horrible.
We support or Attack thought or A social system Just based on morality
But Two hundred years have passed Since then
Wait what?
I donāt see how capitalism brings creativity tho⦠when I look at ancient civilizations and smaller cultures I see an abundance of creative work and ideas. Plus, I would argue that competition is not as efficient as cooperation
āThe money machine eats creativity and sh1ts quantityā
Those civilisations stood for a very, very, long time and even then, what were they able to produce? Compare those civilisations to modern societies and how much more inventions are coming out.
Cooperation is part of competition.
It's not one person against another, it's groups against groups.
But when you're cooperating entirely it just doesn't work; it's harder to specialise and it's just difficult to see how so much unity would be beneficial. What would the motivation be even?
Seeking outside help surely has its own place. That being said, depression is rather an internal conflict that ought to be solved by the individual themselves. Self-analysis and common sense are all you need to possess to efficiently fight it.
But now it is 2024,Almost two hundred years since the communist manifesto And other Theory That prove the rule That capitalism Is going to the doom,Just as it destroyed the feudalism.
Look at our capitalist countries!
The countries w/ the highest quality of life are all capitalist.
The Feudalism last for hundreds of years,As a more energetic system,Capitalism will last far more long than It's Predecessor
It is internal, and one need not medicate themselves forever. In such circumstances the medication is a crutch to be used until the body is healed enough to stand on itās own and relearned how to walk. Therapy and medication.
But we shouldnāt downplay any aspect or treatment.
We can however see the overmedication issue as a problem.
And the globalization of capitalism,Which just accomplished For less than fifty years,So from this aspect there is still a long life for the system.
I mean, soviet union only last a few decades and they made huge progress compared to capitalist countries. Their inventions are just unbelievable, I donāt even know who decided they didnāt beat USA in cold war
Globalisation got a bad name, sadly, but in the second run the ppl who were left out should be included!
I would say the cooperation based on high centralized management with selfless contribution for long-term is not possible and its stability can't compare with high stablized capitalist under the rule of law
They definitely didn't win: they collapsed.
And creativity in capitalism is saturated and almost rare. Everyone is a copy
I tell you, a dictatorship will gets things done much faster than a democratic regime.
everything will collapse once you have made a mistake that everyone follows you
that would be catastropic
But a democratic regime is more stable and when you bring capitalism w/ it, it's still more successful.
Look at the quality of life in the Soviet Union.
Where is successful?
to be specific that's not a dictatorship but an authoritarian rule
The economic and personal freedoms that were so limited..!
So called modern life of a capitalist democratic nation is based on the bloody exploitation of the slaves in the third world And the labour
Was it not a dictatorship?
It essentialy was. There was one supreme leader.
Democracy under capitalism is almost a myth. Government only exists to protect private property and they control the means of communication too
Manipulation is not democratic
You can see the tranquil life of a Little citizen,Is based on the death of thousands of hundreds of people in Africa or other place
They protect private property but they make capitalism more fair (or they should, at least) and protect people.
And,Just as the Marxism set,Every society has its Counterpart in ideology,So do democracy freedom the protection of a private Property
We can say well maybe five hundred years ago when the kingdom and the king still alive in the most part of the world, they are progressive.
That is happening less now but this was a huge problem.
Oh really?In fact from my viewpoint, nothing changed
The fact is, however, slavery is inefficient and it's horrible and absolutely disgusting but the ppl back then were too stupid to realise.
Protect who? They slaughter people
And let them die
It has transformed, yes, but there are much more human rights and liberties than there were before.
I mean, we can keep crying about how harsh life is or utilize that time to mitigate it.
Today's scummy state of medicine is another conversation.
Compare the human rights and liberties from now and the pass; you should compare the quality of life and the persecution of those who continue to abuse others.
Ofc, there's still a lot of work to do.
āBack thenā there is slavery happening now in Bangladesh, Egypt, India, etc
Although the people in Africa get their independence with their blood to fight against the western Colonistļ¼But in today, most country of Africa has hugely affected the boss political and economicalļ¼By the largest Empire.
That is true. I was focusing on European slavery, and it's still disgusting, but compared to back then, it's a lot less.
Even then, I've read the Gov. of India is trying to stop it (as they should) but I'm not sure if it's a direct outcome from capitalism.
The point is that capitalism needs cheap labour, they canāt survive without exploitation
They're doing better thanks to capitalism.
You certainly can survive without exploitation and cheap labour. Look at modern corporations, for example.
And I also want to say so called human rights ļ¼I don't care about it,The bourgeois Always replace their own interests with the whole.And you seem to ignore that It is the capitalist globalization rule That makes the slaughter in the Africa in the Asia in the South America
It's an unfortunate outcome, that's true, but that's why there's governments and democracy and it should or will change for the better.
Well, the textile industry certainly isnāt
Even the France,A relatively weak capitalist colonial empire,Commented bloody Crimes in the North Africa And Vietnam
I did not deny or ignore it, but a lot of ppl who support capitalism don't support that, but that horrible history is changing for the better and it's happening less now.
So the so called human rights and progress under the capitalism,To these countries, people is Nothing more than a sarcasm
It's sometimes satirical! Although, it does a lot you see.
Look at how much progress has been made because of capitalism!
But the government doesnāt work for us. Thatās the reality. It works only for the bourgeoisie because itās created for them in the first place
Yeah, you can say Well, everything in the capitalist society is changing is going to the better ,But who makes that?Did the capitalist were committed the improvement Simply because they find theirDivine conscience To theSuffering neighboursļ¼
Education, specialisation, creativity, innovation, etc. The mass exploitation and colonisation was horrible, but it is clear that now modern economic powerhouses don't want that.
Of course not
And they realise now it was most cruel and horrible and that they're changing for the better, or at least trying to.
the leader that decides everything and a leader that decides somethings and nominate someone to do things under his administration is different
A lot of change, but one thing is that in these democratic societies people began to realise how awfully cruel that was.
I searched up its meaning and practically all of them match up w/ calling it a dictatorship.
The health services in Britain is the result of the workers movementļ¼The Keynesian myth also became a myth after the Second world War, when Soviet Russia, the first country in the world to use a widely planned economy, managed to save most of its people from the economic crisis.In fact, it is not the capitalist themselves improving themselves ,It is they are changing the ways they rule To keep their crown last for thousands of years to the forever.
Sorry, I do not follow.
They do, or at least they should.
In a free and democratic society, which itself is not perfect, will tend to work for the people.
Education? - it never costed more to have a degree and it has never been so useless for employment.
Inovarion ? - I see a bunch of useless junks of technology that we donāt even need and only keeps us more and more isolated and lonely and more suitable to manipulation.
Creativity? - Every product seems like a joke, style over substance
Compare that to a communist regime which is a dictatorship basically, an oligarchy, inevitably.
And this progress is limited, pale and ludicrous, and when the banner of progress violates or exceeds the limits of the Bourgeois, it is ruthlessly erased. We all remember how Chile's leftist president Allende was overthrown by a U.S.-backed military coup.
Communism doesnāt even have a state
Education is still important. There are problems w/ technology (but it's still innovation at the end of the day) but that's why we have government to create policies and regulations. It is still, creativity.
Look at all the videos you see on social media, what they're able to share and do is because of capitalism!
You, here, being able to express yourself is because of capitalism.
I do remember that, and that is very problematic and undemocratic!!
I remember reading there was regret on that decision, and it is a failure of government, no doubt in that.
And what is your concept of a dictatorship? Nothing more than the ideological waste of American imperialism. In fact, capitalism itself is a huge dictatorship. Just to a different degree and under different guise. There was the so-called democratic government of Roosevelt or Thatcher, which was so keen to repress the slaughter of workers and to take milk from their children as the fruit of their struggle, and there was Nazi Germany, which was in bed with the bureaucrats of capitalist Germany. This unabashed state apparatus, now often considered a dictatorship, took the lives of tens of millions of people.
Youāre seeing only the surface. Yes, technology is fascinated. But what those videos mean? What are they telling? Are they keeping us better?
But capitalism tends to head to the betterment of society.
Capitalism is keeping us so unhappy and burnout and all we have to express is pure sadness and depression and pessimism
I cannot tell you. It is still clearly creativity and innovation, all those new inventions! Consider all the science reports or essays or cool videos! All those skills and them being able to share is thanks to capitalism!
so you think someone decides everything like it's literally above everything he can do anything he want is as same as the leader that only gives instruction and having power to nominate someone to do the job.
is it the same ?
How is capitalism a huge dictatorship?
Nazi Germany was a terrible fascist regime. You saw the worst of humanity there.
It is not the same, but I'm not sure if I agree w/ your definition of a dictatorship (what is it, btw).
It isļ¼ based on the capitalist ways of production.The capitalist establish the framework of Policy.But one of their most important goal,Is to prevent the working class to liberate themselves.
Thatās debatable. Think all the research that is not invested because a few group of people who decides whatās valuable donāt see the use of it. Think all the pure research that is discounted because itās not applicable
I think the second one is not a dictatorship but it's an authoritarian rule
I am very happy and it seems like most people are happier than they were a long time ago, and healthier, and safer. There are societal problems, sure, but these can be managed.
both are authoritarian but one is totalitarian and another one is just authoritarian
And if you willing to read more Historical materials about now the German,You will find that This country is not the kingdom of the insane people,But a bureaucratic country Cooperated By ideology culter And Bureaucrats,Which is,The lifeline of the capitalism country.
Why do you believe that? Yikes! I'm hiring a new Secretary of State. Their thought shall be free, but may I note (actually, no, may not note) that I'll be holding a gun to their throat and plenty of spies..!
Very well stated
I'm having trouble understanding. What do you mean by its a bureaucratic country?
Even modern Germany has annoying bureaucrats, tbh.
But,Could they, could the regime,Survive even in one day without all the bureaucrats?
Where did you read that to get that definition?
humm what are you talking about
Maybe the German will be a huge Free territory without government
Just a funny analogy to your comment.
So good talking to you guys, it inspires me to study more. Anyway, itās really late and I got to sleep. Goodnight!
I have no clue.
seems pretty funny but doesn't make any sense
Goodnight!!
GOOD NIGHT
You could have a guessļ¼If some day you wake up, there's no Policeman, no armyļ¼No officers,How could the country will be?
It will be in a chaos Isn't it?
Let me clarify for you. You differentiate someone deciding everything and is above everything from someone who just gives instructions and has the power to nominate someone. In my analogy I use the SoS (bc it's American and you get the connotation of democracy or capitalism) and say that I appointed them, as if I was president, but then I added the twist which would happen if the first part of your comment applied: a gun to their throat and spies all around.
Surely it will.
Chaos. There would be no order without some government.
So you can understand why a bureaucrat is a lifeline of a capitalist country
Some form of government, even if you remove that term, "government", will happen.
Anarchism always leads to some hierarchical structure or inevitable "government."
I can see that, and government is important.
So might you differentiate the two?
A SoS being hired by "[a] leader that only gives instruction and having power to nominate someone to do the job" and then adding the twist where "someone decides everything like it's literally above everything he can do anything he want[.]"
If there is no bureaucrats to commit Oppression And something,The political order of capitalism will be ruined,If there is not ideology, state machines,People's thought well in chaos .Anti capitalist ideology will In prosperity. It will surely Effect The economic order.
Your assumption is that all of them commit oppression and making it seem like all of them are bad and then making it so they all disappear..!
you assume they got a gun on their throat and spies all around
That's wiping out all the good and bad. It's like saying if I have a piece of cheese that's a bit molded, let me remove all of it. There's no more bad cheese!
I did not, because it is my analogy, where I had that power.
that doesn't really happen in most authoritarian nations besides Soviet Union
Even then, you shouldn't have taken it that literally..!
If it isn't a gun, it's some form of bribery or control or forced loyalty.
Take, for example, your own country: China!
Omg, that reminds me when Biden called Xi Jinping a "dictator." š
isn't that obvious everyone follows order even the leader will do unlike he can just bypass it
that's not dictatorship
I don't want to say, yes, all the officials or the police, they are bad, they are fuckers, and they have to be killed, but what they are doing is actually maintaining a regime that is hostile to the working people and continues to oppress them politically and exploit them economically, and this regime is in the hands of the bourgeoisie who are hostile to the working people and exploit and oppress them economically. Nor does it mean that all the rich or the comfortable are bourgeois. Society is made up of different groups, but the material activities of the different groups are ultimately transmitted to only two levels - the bourgeoisie and the proletarians.
What?
I don't understand what you're trying to say.
Agreed
Truth hirts
They're maintaining a country yes, and you assume that it's hostile and that it continues to oppress and do so much bad (that's what we're debating here), and your assumption that there are only two classes..!
It's unfortunate, but that really isn't capitalism's fault but how silly the U.S. Government is at managing gun policies.
An individual's thought or behavior is ultimately determined by his social status. I certainly do not rule out that a dutiful policeman is a good father at home, but his social status - the police force determines that if he does his duty dutifully he will be on the opposite side of the exploited, and objectively we have to knock him down and destroy him, but not kill him.
It is
If you may note, I'm sure there's capitalist countries at the very bottom. š
Omg that emoji- I meant to type "; )!"
How so?
Capitalism is the main problem of this
saying that the government is the problem is something repetitive
This means what: "the police force determines that if he does his duty dutifully he will be on the opposite side of the exploited, and objectively we have to knock him down and destroy him, but not kill him."
If you analise, all the governments aren't enough
Because capitalism just works exploiting workers
It is his social identities determines Who he is
It is clearly the problem here. You can see the gatekeeping, the bills not passing, or the obstruction of justice on this. Then, when you do see those same policies pass in different countries, you see those rates drop and drop and drop.
How does that relate to gun violence? Or how that relates to a man buying a gun and going to shoot random ppl for no reason?! You apt to say, I am guessing, because capitalism invented the gun, and that's why..?!
Bruh, the things can get better for you if the government changes
His job, yes, which he joined because he has a passion for.
Exactly, AND IT CHOOSES NOT TO!
It chooses not to change and limit gun policies. That's exactly why those gun rates are so high.
Of course if he is a labour may be we can be a very good friendsļ¼But if he still waving his Pistols On the streetļ¼And Objectively serve For the government which was controlled and served for the capitalism and I , a labor want to get emancipation,Now we are stand on the reverse Standpoint
Everything that is profitable in capitalism is beneficial for the bourgeoisie
He legally must serve the government, but law is not everything; sometimes even if the law says something, a police officer might break it because he still has humanity in him. The law might even change after.
Yeah, maybe I can punch his faceļ¼But if he know what he is doing and do not Serve for the capitalismļ¼Even better ļ¼he Understand and even joined us,Maybe we are brother now.
The middle class?
what?
You can't punch his face, legally. He doesn't need to serve capitalism bc he is serving the government. I'm not sure what this is even about, tbh.
The bourgeoisie, is it the middle class?
No, the bourgeoisie is the rulling class
Yeah, now you are reached the different part of the Super structure .
But now I must take a sleep
Middle class are workers
Good Afternoon guys
Oh, my apologies. Is there even such a thing?
It's 12:57 a.m. here and I should probably sleep too. š
What do you mean by "such a thing"?
A "ruling class."
For your health,You had better Sleep
Iām saying the dictator you have said is a board term even it can include some administrative duties that did not directly involve the decision or like I have said nominate someone to do it, isnāt that obvious almost every government have a head that nominate people to do their job ?
Ofc. That's what I plan on doing in 5 min. Sleep well!!
Like, are you asking if the bourgeoisie is the really problem??
Itās just like you are saying oh you are the leader you decides something so itās dictatorship

Yes, but that's not what I was saying or what my analogy was on. You might've misinterpreted it.
No, if it is a thing or not, because I don't believe in it.
Bye!!
Believing or not, it exists
There needs to be more context here.
Our society is divided by social classes
A dictator is someone with extreme powers. They're above the law or whatever authority there is basically entirely, and they have total power. Usually there's no way to remove them either.
What if the law is allowed such a leader not above the law or something you said like total power
Also they pretend to be a democracy
That is not a dictatorship.
But there needs to be more context, ofc.
Then just like as I said thatās not above the law
What powers, for how long, and were they elected?
So thatās authoritarian rule
Yes, but the Soviet Union was a dictatorship.
You're saying the leader didn't have basically total power & wasn't above the law?
Power for nominate government officials, power to involve government matters, power to control the military, power to ratify the policies
It was
If the law says they have total power then they have total power.
How so not? Stalin took power to himself and persecuted opposition
I did not say that. @feral river said that the Soviet Union was not a dictatorship or something like it was more specifically authoritarian.
Yes, yes! That was my point all along.
Find something I said Soviet Union is not a dictatorship
Is or isn't?
All Iām saying is there is another term called authoritarian rule to define the leader have the power to do a lot of things to get involve in certain government matters not only just the dictatorship that determines everything
And I didnāt really say Soviet Union is not a dictatorship
Actually it is
Yes, but there's nothing that says it's "technically authoritarian."
Yes, the Soviet Union was authoritarian too but there's nothing, like I said, that makes it "technically authoritarian" and not "technically a dictatorship." Technically is such an ambiguous word, imo. Should be avoided.
The example you gave out is a technically authoritarian which is my home, China
What example?
The analogy I made?
I never understand "technically" bc it's too ambiguous. I would really change the wording so it's easier to understand what you're trying to say.
But capitalism is in fact huge dictatorship
But I'm happy we arrived at the same conclusion: the Soviet Union is a dictatorship.
Not surprised but a successful dictatorship I would say
We born in dictatorship of parents,we live under dictatorship of money and die in dictatorship of diseases.
Oh, that was f/ what happens.
WAIT A SECOND....
China is a dictatorship.
You can describe it as authoritarian too, ofc.
Your Constitution itself describes it being a dictatorship:
https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/lawsregulations/201911/20/content_WS5ed8856ec6d0b3f0e9499913.html
Article 1. The Peopleās Republic of China is a socialist state governed by a peopleās democratic dictatorship that is led by the working class and based on an alliance of workers and peasants.
It continues to use the word "dictatorship" throughout the passage.
Exactly, the police just exist to serve the rulling class. The argument of "communist want violent revolution" doesn't make any sense, because if we want to build a new system that works against the bourgeoisie, then the bourgeoisie will react towards us with violence. Not to mention EVERY system needs revolution to be built
I should sleep tbh, but my mind has not been changed.
At the end of the day, capitalism is why you are here.
both USA and China are capitalist dictatorships
Oh!
Well, I disagree. I have to go now btw.
It was nice talking and even if we disagree Iām happy we were nice & still considered our thoughts! ; )
Perhaps one day you or me will realise one of us is wrong!
Imagine if we were in slavery and a defender of it said:
"At the end of the day, slavery is why you are here."
You're literally complaining about people not being satisfacted with this system.
People's democratic dictatorship (Chinese: äŗŗę°ę°äø»äøęæ; pinyin: RĆ©nmĆn MĆnzhĒ ZhuÄnzhĆØng) is a phrase incorporated into the Constitution of the People's Republic of China and the Constitution of the Chinese Communist Party. The premise of the "People's democratic dictatorship" is that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and state represent and act on b...
This would be helpful
Dictate by people, what a dictatorship
But in the end who cares, if a dictatorship works
Many dictatorships have worked throughout history, and it was normal, today we want to live in a false democracy
And we want to delude ourselves that there is democracy
But, in reality, democracy is like communism, it can never work perfectly
communism is too high to reach
How nihilistic
When it comes to hypothetical perfection, nihilism is a must š
Did you win immediately? Let me remind of the Opium Wars you lost against the british. Let us assume we're there now, why didn't you surrender to the present case? Because it's your historical land and you've a historical right in it. Why can't you apply the same to Palestine? Outright contradiction.
I can't understand that,but seems you stand before the Enlightment

Thatās not because we are historically in it but because we are the most powerful regime and nation ever throughout the history in the region of China, even British came here and fight a war against us and even they win they still canāt divide our nation
All I can applied on Palestine is a proxy state of Iran fight against Americans Israelis and Saudis and they donāt really care the Palestine and the people who recognize themselves as Palestinian
A little chauvinism
We are the most powerful state in that region throughout the history even the time we have little connection with empires in Middle East we still dominated the region and established our rule and order
Thatās why our name is äøå½(China) not because we are exporting China so we are so called China but äøå½ means the state in the center of the world.
You must heard of Silk Road
The protectorate of west region
yeah
The Silk Road was a network of Eurasian trade routes active from the second century BCE until the mid-15th century. Spanning over 6,400 km (4,000 mi), it played a central role in facilitating economic, cultural, political, and religious interactions between the Eastern and Western worlds. The name "Silk Road" was first coined in the late 19th ce...
but is there any connections between Empires and me?
Idk maybe
ęä»„ä½ äøŗå„č¦čÆ“čæä¹äøå å°ē²ēŗ¢ä¼¼ēčÆę„
沔为ä»ä¹ļ¼äøęÆęäŗŗč°å·“åęÆå¦åå²åäøå½åå²åļ¼éč¦čÆ“äøå½ęč±å½äŗŗč·å·“åęÆå¦ę仄č²åäøę ·
äøęē蓦
ęčÆ“ä½ å·“åęÆå¦ęÆä»ä¹ļ¼
äøå½åęÆä»ä¹
å¹½é»
å°ē²ēŗ¢å°±ē®äŗå§ļ¼åä»ę„ę¬åę„
Hummm you must mean that the the more distribution of the wealth and power to proletariat they got the more communism they close.
Hi Chinese
But I donāt think the proletariat really deserve to have more wealth because they did some simple work
And he names it advanced words 
Iām a freaking capitalist-nationalist
hello random people on the internet
I think we need to solve islamophobia here
Me and my dear homies @thorny steeple @waxen oyster want to debate
I only have one question
ISLAMOPHOBIA IS A SERIOUS ISSUE TGHAT IS BEGNG DEVELOPED IN RECENT CHILDREN
No
no ? why is it
hate towards muslim is different with hate towards jew
jew?
You mean hebrew?
Semitism is just using a language that got from Sam
hate towards the people who believe in Islam is different with hate towards the people who believe in Judaism
is it ?
Judaism != Semitism
how do you think it is the same?
You are using it completly wrong here
ā
arabs are semitic
Assyrians are
Chaldeans
ah so they called semitic ?
too many ethnic groups
nope, semitism has nothing to do with religion
Not a Religion Problem
They are Semitic People, Media just focuses on Jews
Jews are not Semitic
š£ļø
They're mostly from europe yes
Hebrew people are
the religion, no
the ethnic, yes
mostly
But that's another topic
oh thank you for replenish the definition but anyway all I'm asking which is hate towards people who believe in Islam as same as hate towards people who believe in Judaism ?
because you said islamophobia
see, well its almost yes.
but the terms are being abused and used in without any reason
like, if u did anything
to jew, even if u r right
u r hating them
that's overuse
nowadays, if u don't like Israel for what THEY do, you're antisemitic
no all I'm thinking is some people thinks islam is bad, hate islam or some negative emotions towards islam and people who believe in islam is as same as some people thinks judaism is bad, hate judaism.
yep, islanophobia is when you're oppressed because of your religion
You can't maintain your own practices, or just burn alive because of your religion
Big example: france
Yes, I'm with you with this part.
I'm just pointing out the abuse of the term usage.
well that's a bit board than you think I still think if you don't like their actions you hate their state is pretty normal but hate towards people because they are holding some special attributives like religion or race something is clearly discrimination.
even for me I'm holding some terrible impression on muslims or typically people who believes islam because of my experience of conversation and communication with them.
for example the problem of religion, war, or what do they think about the war and how do they affect other people.
I See, so its the beliefs of them
if you're disagreeing with them, that's normal.
We just want some respect towards us, nothing more.
like do not deal with us specially
yes it's the belief of them that's no problem but changing the society based on their belief is what I'm opposing.
sharia law in Britain, annex Israel, independence Xinjiang
oh,you mean Shari'a Law
that was ridiculous and unacceptable.
well
if the majority of people is Muslim
isnt that their right to decide wether to apply it or not?
well yes if it's fit on the current government body under the rule of law and it regulated that you can apply it, ofc you can do
fyi, Shari'a does include non-Muslims rights to do their own beliefs
see Constitution of Medina
yes but a different system I would say if what if they don't want to apply it
there were Muslims, Jews, Christians and Pagans
why wouldn't they?
you may ask why would they because for me I'm living in current system which is not sharia law, and my life is so damn good why would I change it
you must convince them to apply your law isn't it
@feral river could you read it and tell me the problem of it for Non-Muslims?
well that's what you guys want not us, why would I know that ?
you guys are promoting it not me
why you think I have to adopt your ideology for no reason
Shari'a prevents things like intrests in Banks for example, is it good?
It's not an oppressing law as you may think
france is more oppressive imo, you can't even wear a hijab which is required for muslim women
because you are speaking as such that you're a victim in that system.
not so good in my persepectives, interests in bank used for adjust state economy and it clearly has benefits
I'm not but I just want to know what's the reason that you must enforce your belief on other people ?
because that's your belief ?
so, how did Islamic countries rise upon Christian nations while they don't have these benefits ?
Islamic empires had its own working economy, we didn't know about the current system yet and we were one of the richest
that's what you should ask yourself isn't it ?
It's like the constitution of the state, are you the one who drafted it or the state that made it?
we too, Chinese empire rise and dominated the east asia for thousand of years but we didn't promote such thing did we ?
did we export revolution abroad ? communism
yeah but most state doesn't adopt this and you guys want to adopt it in other state is the problem I'm asking
they are working properly based on current system why would they adopt you guys system ?
what about Taoism?
we dont even believe Taoism in here.
because china is secular state now
well we are a state adopted separation between religion and politics for all the time almost
well, as i said, if the majority are muslim, then they would want to adopt it, what's the problem?
based on rule of law and system of election and nomination, no problem as I said earlier
Why then killing Uyghurs in East Turkestan?
š then there is no problem.
you can see the map and you find nothing about East Turkestan
only Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region
Chinese propaganda tbh š
literally they abusing Muslims there
Don't get me started about Uyghur Muslims
oh really ? what about Hui Chinese they are muslims and they live in other places in China too but why they are living good.
yeah, that's what's oppressive, not sharia law sir
I live in China I have some Hui Chinese friends believe in Islam and there is no problem with that
we also respect their religion and practices
I'm specifically talking aboug Xinxang region for a reason
they are turkic
got invaded
Xinjiang is part of China, it's an autonomous region of China.
slayed
all the time
East Turkestan raised a revolution against China, why they didn't make the poll system and make the people choose if they want to speerate or not?
after the establishment of People's Republic of China, there is only one government in Xinjiang which is People's government of Xinjiang Uyghur autonomous region
why they killed thousands?
did you see what did I said ?
there is only one government in Xinjiang which is People's government of Xinjiang Uyghur autonomous region
the East Turkestan you have said, doesn't exist
Xinxang original name is East Turkestan.
Xinxang means (Restored Lands)
people from that region have always called it East Turkestan
trying to teach me mandarin doesn't work sir
why enforcing that name?
and you are not even arguing
trying to ignore a revolution that happened in your country isnt gonna work also
was the revolution success ?
Yes. they established the country.
then china invaded them again
Why? isn't that
oppression?
š¤£
their revolution success under Chinese rule ?
Overwhelming, huh?
that was funny
Trve
there's no muslims getting hurt in the uyghur
I hope you got the joke.
admit the truth or I will just quit the conversation.
There is only one government in Xinjiang which is People's government of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region
also, what about the the East Turkestan independence movement? is it also imagination?
the truth or your truth?
it exists
Joke or not, it's partly true
why does it exist
You are literally Chinese talking about opression
East Turkestan independence movement exists, yes as I said some people think they can establish their country in our territory.
