#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 201 of 1
which was recorded by later greek writers that he studied in India
India
They meant the Levant, certainly not China, their consideration has nothing to do with it, for them the East was a place to go on holiday
not the levant ..
Yeah a decentralized one. I don't think it's Chinese propaganda, even Japan, which has a long history of rivarly against China, shows signs of Confucian ideals according to scholars
They never had much contact with other parts of the world, I don't know which Greek philosophers you studied, but they rarely spoke about countries foreign to this area
Did he? Even Alexander didn't conquer the entire India
Only Northern parts of India
They are brainwashed
Yeah, he had a hard time conquering the Northern part, he didn't go much far towards the south
it is recorded by greek writers that Pyhthagoras studied in India
Agreed
and, took the idea of transmigration from the Indians
Furthermore, he tried to colonize this part of India, but his rule was so short that it is as if he had never been there
Provided to YouTube by Parlophone UK
Alexander the Great (356-323 B.C.) (2015 Remaster) Ā· Iron Maiden
Somewhere in Time
ā 1986, 2015 Iron Maiden LLP under exclusive license to Parlophone Records Ltd, a Warner Music Group Company (World ex. US) | 1986, 2015 Iron Maiden LLP under exclusive license to Sanctuary Records Group Ltd., a BMG Company ...
The third-century AD Sophist Philostratus claims that, in addition to the Egyptians, Pythagoras also studied under sages or gymnosophists in India
It's just a theory
Germany, absurd productive output for its size and population
whether its true or not , the greek , definitely romanticize this part of the world
as a source of wisdom
That's right
gymnosophits might be the jains
" naked philosphers"
They probably mocked it as well, they did that with Egypt
If you say so
I think Westphalen produces much more than the other parts, and that there many provinces that produces a very irrelevant amount compared to the whole country, is that right?
Egyptian society was deemed brilliant and advanced but Egyptians themselves were also made fun of for their greater attachment to traditions
They also romanticize egypt
Ultimately Greeks thought of themselves as the best, same as the Romans did
"Wise philosophers studying philosophy in Egypt and coming back " was a common trope among the greeks
For productivity, absolute credit goes to the western regions, such as Westfalen, but for quality of life and wealth the south wins over everyone. I saw cities like Augsburg which prospered, clean streets, many social initiatives, lots of business, excellent salaries, ideal cities
The South too is a productive monster
Very common trope
Why is that? Were western provinces always more prosperous or it has anything with the post-WWII division?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_German_states_by_GRDP
Bavaria is second
This article is about the gross regional domestic product (GRDP) of German states. Most figures are from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany; figures from other sources are otherwise referenced. The GRP of German states are shown in Euro (ā¬). For easier comparison as per IMF estimates, all the figures are converted into US$ according to an...
This also explains why Bayern demands independence
They got both Mercedes Benz and BMW
It has a little to do with their culture, tho
Both
It never caught up after 1989
It's a way of legitimizing their philosophy with it being traced to the egyptians
Plotinus, the great neo-platonic philosopher, did the same thing
I don't think they were making fun of the egyptians
The industrial centre of the world used to be around Benelux and England, so all regions closer to them also tended to be the most prosperous
I think Bavaria has one advantage: tourism. There are truly many places to visit, they have a great artistic, humanistic and naturalistic heritage. Then they have always had a stable government and targeted policies, furthermore their economy is very diversified, they have a large manufacturing sector
It's weird how such figures as Wagner, Nietzsche and Goethe all studied in Saxony, always ahead
trump or biden?
It's not just merely my assertion.
It's a very common trope
I mean, but there's also a cultural aspect, Bavarians think they differ very much from other Germans
" Travelling to India and egypt to learn philosophy "
Very common trope
Pyrrhus was also the one who failed miserably in conquering southern Italy
This is true, I have relatives there, speaking of other Germans and foreigners with a hint of hatred
You mean Pyrrho?
I'd go for Trump but I have nothing to do with the US
Read tao te ching
You need to faithfully and fairly engage with the Chinese system first to determine who's superior
Apophaticism and negative theology right from the beginning
Taoism and Buddhism were syncretised to form chan buddhism( or zen buddhism in Japanese)
What is bro babbling about
Comparing philosophers with generals and artists
It clearly shows your lack of knowledge in this domaine
Please stop embarrassing yourself š
And think before you say stuff
We were talking about history and culture, ergo I can make this comparison
Is this more of a general comparison between the Chinese and the greeks ?
Or between Asian and European?
Because the Mongols completely mogged the Roman Empire and Alexander the great as far as land empire and conquering goes
But, It was shot lived tho
Caesar was both an artist and a poet, Napoleon was both a mathematician and a general, Charlemagne was both an intelectual and a general. U are the one lacking stuff here.
If it weren't for the mongols ,who significantly weakened the muslim powers by their invasion, the Christian west would have a different history.
These crusaders were already petrified by the Muslims that there were hoping for some king from the east who will defeat the Muslims
Your country is?
Russia

The Mongols enslaved the Russians and massacred several Slavic peoples, now tell me how would they have helped us? Furthermore, we defended you from the Muslims long before the Mongols arrived. The Franks under Charlemagne played an essential role in this. Furthermore, Muslims have not been a significant problem for us since the fall of the caliphate, with the exception of the Turks, the only people who managed to settle in the Balkans until the early twentieth century; they were expelled en masse after the first Balkan war. In the end Europe managed to survive on its own without anyone's help
marital alliances between Christian rulers and the Mongols of the Golden Horde continued, such as when the Byzantine emperor Andronicus II gave daughters in marriage to Toqta (d. 1312) and later to his successor Ćzbeg (1312ā1341).
?
This means nothing, the golden horde had occupied European territories and they too had to be fought and defeated
Byzantine Roman emperors were giving daughters to the Mongol rulers to form alliances
Everyone in Europe did it lol
What a disgrace
The Mongols together with the Arabs tried to destroy us, they didn't succeed, I don't care about minor alliances, they were just strategic alliances, but deep down they hated each other
Lol Many of the Christian states were allying themselves with the mongols against the Muslims
This is bad?
Iam talking about how mongol invasion significantly weakens thr muslim power
Not that those alliances were bad
Didn't Mongols conquered the Muslims?
Muslim power in Europe?
"Minor alliances" lol.
It was only in the Balkans and the Iberian Peninsula of Spain lol
Great movie on your profile pic
Like Emperor giving away their daughters type of minor alliances
You didn't read the entire paragraph
.
Around 1262 or 1263, the Mamluk leader Baibars attempted an attack on Antioch, but the principality was saved by Mongol intervention.[42] In later years the Mongols were not able to offer as much support. In 1264ā1265 the Mongols were able to attack only the frontier fort of al-Bira. In 1268 Baibars completely overran the rest of Antioch, ending the 170-year-old principality.[43][44]
In 1271, Baibars sent a letter to Bohemond threatening him with total annihilation and taunting him for his alliance with the Mongols:
Hi aust
Indeed.
Iirc we have talked about this before lol
I always feel the urge to say lmao I love Bergman
Persona and The seventh seal 
Antioch isn't even in Europe
Guys you apperntly read the wrong history links
I still don't understand the point of your discussion
İg his point about how Muslims were the best in 13th century
Where
bro said that if it hadn't been for the Mongols, Europe wouldn't be the same as it is today, I was trying to say the opposite
In Africa, the Middle East, Europe?
.
Ops
Wrong ping
Hell
It is logical that if you change the past, the future will change
Emperor Michael VIII Palaiologos, after re-establishing Byzantine Imperial rule, established an alliance with the Mongols.
He signed a treaty in 1266 with the Mongol Khan of the Kipchak (the Golden Horde),[9] and he married two of his daughters (conceived through a mistress, a Diplovatatzina) to Mongol kings: Euphrosyne Palaiologina, who married Nogai Khan of the Golden Horde, and Maria Palaiologina, who married Abaqa Khan of Ilkhanid Persia.[10]
Yes, because without the mongols weakening the muslim powers, the fate of Christian Europe seems very deem as the Christian were losing territories to the Muslims lol
Central Europe suffered no damage from the Mongol invasion
It was just a strategic alliance, the Byzantines had defeated the Muslims much earlier with Greek fire
What territories?
The siege of Jerusalem for example
Jerusalem is not in Europe
the Slavs suffered a lot from their invasion, but bro only talks about the Byzantine Empire
Because they fear mongol invasion
But, it was under the Roman empire
The Slavs lived and live in Eastern Europe, not in central
Throughout history we defeated the Muslims when we were even weaker, the Mongols played a side role in this time
When the Roman Empire collapsed, the eastern weakened Roman Empire was captured by the Ottomans and they took all its territories
The Ottomans were only able to do something in the Balkans
Brother, I'm trying to explain to you that some Europeans suffered their invasions
Yes, they suffered, my hometown was burned once because of Batu
Around the 12th century
This proves that the Mongols were just barbarians who had no mercy towards anyone, but fortunately karma exists
Is that why Muslims were Over Running all your territories ?
Islam expanded into the Caucasus through the Muslim conquest of Persia in the 7th century and entered Southern Europe after the Umayyad conquest of Hispania in the 8thā10th centuries; Muslim political entities existed firmly in what is today Spain, Portugal, Sicily, and Malta during the Middle Ages.
The Caucasus is not Europe
Spain was liberated by the Christians, not by the Mongols, this reasoning makes no sense
Alexander was merciful?
Span and Portugal is not europe?
I wrote above about the Iberian Peninsula
He created new cities and exported refined Greek culture, what did the Mongols do? The guttural chants?
They created the silk Road
They were liberated by the Christians, at least this should be clear to everyone
Numerous outposts and trade routes
@thorn lagoon Do you know about the reconquista on the Iberian Peninsula?
Possible after mongols significantly weakening the muslim powers.
This mainly benefited Asia, not Europe
Why should it benefit europe tho?
Alexandra conquest benefitted the locals?
This also makes no sense, the Muslim kingdom in Spain was independent and quite prosperous too, the Mongols never got there
No
How could the Mongols weaken the Muslim Kingdom in Spain if they did not get there?
Alexander brought innovation to the peoples of the Middle East, his was to be an empire inspired by the eastern monarchies, he had no intention of destroying their history and that model of
These are campaigns whose purpose was to expel Muslims from the territories of Spain and Portugal.
Lol, I was trying to say that
Yea i got it
And you know what, the Spanish Golden Age began when the Muslims were expelled from Spain š
Iam talking about muslim power in general.
They would have expanded more into the heartland of europe
Without the mongols being there
Because Portugal and Spain became the main colonial powers of their time (and they had huge reserves of gold)
And the reconquista is the proof that the Europeans did not need the Mongols to repel the Arabs
There were no Mongols in the heart of Europe
Lol you are coping
the heart of Europe is in Bohemia
After 1295, Andronikos II offered Ghazan a marital alliance, in exchange for Mongol help to fight against the Turcomans at the Oriental frontier of the Byzantine Empire. Ghazan accepted the offer and promised to stop the incursions.[14] The death of Ghazan in 1304 was mourned by the Byzantines.[15]
This alliance would continue under Ghazan's successor, Oljeitu. In 1305, Ilkhan Oljeitu promised Andronikos II 40,000 men, and in 1308 dispatched 30,000 men to recover many Byzantine towns in Bithynia.[16] Andronicus II gave daughters in marriage to Toqta, as well as his successor Uzbek (1312ā1341),[12] but relations turned sour at the end of Andronikos's reign and the Mongols mounted raids on Thrace between 1320 and 1324, until the Byzantine port of Vicina Macaria was occupied by the Mongols.
The golden age began in 1492, when they expelled the Muslims from Iberia and discovered America
Byzantine Roman Empire giving away their daughters to mongol rulers to help them fight the muslims
This is what I said
Understood
They also expelled the Jews at that time
The Byzantine Empire was weak and looking for help, what was wrong with that?
The Ottomans also expelled Jews into Syria, Egypt and today's Israel.
But, weren't you talking about how independent and strong European powers were in resisting muslim expansion?
Seems they were seeking help of the mongols by giving away their daughters
I didnāt say anything like that, I said that Muslims were expelled from Europe long ago
Okay, then, my message is targeted on andosweher
The Byzantine Empire was not a strong power at that time
Constant raids by the Ottomans and the difficult situation inside the country weakened the country
The ottomans happened after the mongols though
We are talking about events before the ottomans
I can't remember any other countries that asked for help during the Ottoman attack lol
The Ottomans had a war with Austria in the Balkans, but the Ottomans lost
Also, from the 16th to 19th centuries, the Ottomans lost a lot of wars to Russia
Christians lost Constantinople to the muslim turks tho
U mean Constantinople?
Yeah
Yes, Constantinople has remained under Turkish rule for many years
But they won the war not with all Christians, but only with Byzantium
Byzantium then owned Constantinople
Sure,but it is one of the most important cultural place for the Christians
And , now it's Istanbul
Especially for the eastern orthodoxy
This is one of the most important cities, but this was not a great loss for Christendom
After Constantinople, Moscow became the main center of Orthodoxy
Russia adopted a lot of culture from Byzantium
I think for Christians now the main cities are Rome and Jerusalem
Almost all of Europe followed the Pope and they didnāt care about the main Orthodox city
@thorn lagoon u kn?
The truly important place for Christians is Rome
For the catholics maybe
???
Do protestant feel the same wayy ?
I think for the protestant ,its jerusalem
In general, European Christianity began to develop in Rome, and it was one of the first major Christian cities, long before Constantinople.
Protestants are a degenerate Christian movement
Initially, the Christian Church was ruled by both the Pope and Patriarch, but the church split into Catholic (led by the Pope) and Orthodox (led by the Patriarch)
Protestantism also appeared in Rome, but most of its followers were in the Germanic countries
I think we separated from our Orthodox brothers only for political reasons, I hope that one day we can reunite
Due to The filoque controversy , right?
There's a long history there
That was one of the aspects I think
I thought it was for a theologocal reason
Thr filoque controversy
It's all the fault of the Byzantines, they didn't want to be subordinated to the Pope
By the way, now the patriarch of the Orthodox Church is elected in Moscow, as I said
For Muslims, Rome is an important Christian city, some of them claim that Muhammad made a prophecy according to which the two most important Christian cities (Rome and Constantinople) will fall under the muslim rule, but I'm still waiting fo the fall of Rome
They have Mecca and Medina
The Ukrainian church broke away the communion with the Russian
Both fell into Christian hands under the rule of the British crown lol
And?
It was like that yea
Saudi Arabia was a state subordinate to the colonial power
After the ottoman rule
Nothing
It means the eastern church is divided
Nope, that means they don't want anything to do with our church.
Now the east is rising
The fact that the Ukrainian church is trying to close itself off from us does not make the Orthodox world fragmented
By the way, did you know that China carried out the genocide of the Uighurs (the only Muslim people in China)
?
By the way, did you hear about the case when Yemeni terrorists shot at Mecca with ballistic missiles?
Fake genocide
They are putting separatist in prisons
Not putting civilians inside concentration camp
In the Soviet Union there was something like concentration camps. "Gulags" are for criminals, I think China has this too
Yeah, they are being used in a negative light,by the western countries to make soviet Union and China look bad
Iam fine with gulag for the criminal
(they were not killed there, but forced to do hard work)
As if that doesnāt happen in every prison
š« brazilians are not allowed here š«
Are we too sexy for this chat
They are but you aren't
Prove
Wdym
May he burn in hell and taste the pain that he has caused to his own people
Hold on
Just delete that ugly face of him
Thanks
He's the worst and most hated for us. He's a chemical war criminal that only knows how to lie. You can search how many churches and masjids he destroyed and then talks about peace and unity or the hundred thousands that was killed bc of him or all my relatives who were either dead or scattered throughout the world
I'm just kidding, I respect you and what he might have done to you / your I'm just kidding, I respect you and what he might have done to you / your relatives
Sorry
It's alright you didn't know. I thought you were one of his supporters.
I have nothing to do with him. I live in South America.
Tamam peace
can I ask who this person is?
it sounds really awful what he's done
Syria's trash president
I heard there's much problems and conflict there but not sure about everything
is it like Kaddafi situation?
I don't know much about him but yeah the war in my country started internally it was civil war but not later as many countries interfered and only caused more destruction
that's very sad
That's life
wish there can be peace everywhere someday
I hope I live till that day:)
World is having many problems now I hope no more wars because there will be very terrible things happening then
Wars won't stop as long as humans exist actually but we can still dream of this.
Fr
No because Kaddafi's situation was rather external, whilst Asaad's is an internal conflict, though it encompasses some external support but nothing on large scale
Are u Lybian?
nnoooo i'm from europe
but I remember some of it from the news
Very Hobbes from you
But that's right, wars won't cease
Starting place is inside people
If everyone desires it why doesnāt it happen
Wow I can tell I'm aging by the way I talk
People desire it but don't practice it
Unfortunately, also I'm sorry if I sounded harsh before. If you like that kind of songs I can send you some but not about him.
So they donāt really want it. We actually love conflict
It's like when you say you want to lose weight but never start working out
Don't worry. You can send me some
I'd say we do... But... Those who want are more powerful, despite being small in gross numbers
It starts with the little things
The desire of conflict is inside of us regardless class. But yeah, overall the blame is on them
However has power wants to conserve it or increase it
Whoever*
Education
I think we naturally want to conserve energy. Sometimes making a change is fighting with your own body
Not in the short run
Neither in the long one
Education also comes from capitalist institution
It depends on them
I'm talking about family education, kids must understand that being evil or bad is not cool, it's just society brainwashing
Violence always comes from weakness
Youāre so naĆÆve I donāt even know where to start
Where do you think the parents got their education from?
Thatās so unrealistic
Plus, violence shouldnāt be taught as wrong. If your kid is being beaten, youāre saying they should do what?
https://youtu.be/XIhfnDsA0Fg?si=8l5lBWws1nXW5S7G
You can listen to this I love it.
Contact us :
Sharbel
004917672282524
004917672282453
www.samergabro.net
itunes : http://artistcamp.rebeat.com/samer-gabro/ashet-souriya/9008798186686/index.html
Violence being taught as wrong is a class brainwash to keep us guilty from getting justice
I'm talking about unnecessary violence or misbehaviors with the only purpose to take advantage of others, not about self defense
It's unrealistic because we are so f***ed up
Good to clarify
Aggression is not necessarily wrong
A lot of people are against a class revolution because of violence
Thatās brainwashing to me
Yeah but mostly because often violence comes from the nuclear family
I call that self defense
Against oppression
So itās hypocritical to say that this type of education should come from a place so fraudulent
Precisely
People who condemn it are all too comfortable
That's why we are messed up and if you can't make a difference on a political or social scale, best thing you can do is educate your kids properly because it goes without saying that they will be the society of the future
Now I stop because I'm starting to sound like a politician 
But that's my thought
I disagree
Best you can do is radicalize people
who donāt have access to education
What do you mean by radicalize?
An outdated book
I don't think god is the solution at all. Wars made in the name of god are countless you should now
Yeah but itās a classic. You gotta read once in your life
??topic
Does technology simplify life or make it more complicated?
I think radicalization is never good regardless, but 
It literally means solving the problem by itās roots
Nothing wrong w that
And of course doesnāt mean that it solve all problems in the world
Contradictions will always exist
It makes it simple and thatās the problem
Makes your life simpler by making you dumber
it do makes life simpler but cause more problems
Not against tech tho, but that's a fact
none can against technology
it develops by time
I meannn
Only if you choose to be
I can use AI to do my homework or to prepare me for my exam
Itās up to the individual
if you rely on chatgpt bots staffs to much you could be
I think you should only use Chatgpt for example when you can't arrive to the answer by yourself even if you try, because if you use it to get ideas or quickly get an answer which you could develop with you brain, you are putting your mind in sleep mode and brain is a muscle, it athrophizes if you don't use it. So the more advanced the tech the more it is a double edged sword
Technology gives us access to everything tho. We could never read so many scientific papers in history
I can read them from all around the globe
You can use it to make questions
And train you for the exam
Sometimes itās hard to find questions about a specific topic
@sonic lion yes that's a good way to use it, but as I said the more powerful a thing is, the more it can cause good and bad in greater measure
oh yeah but everything including bad things
It bad is almost all caused by the people in power
They use AI to decrease our service
Have it cheaper
The problem is also with information without knowledge
Btw I use it to help with my coding projects because it helps me focusing more on how I want to structure my project instead of the technicalities
And it goes so fast we barely have time to process
Thatās what Iām saying, on an individual level is a good thing
But when you amplify it
Itās a nightmare
Sure thing
People disqualifying artists is the worst to me
Knife in baker's hands is not the same thing as in killer's hands
Good point haha
Upcoming times are going to be interesting that's for sure
@sonic lion nice chat we had, see you 
Same < 3
There are other muslim groups in China other than the uighur
" Savage Mongols vs Civilized and merciful romans "
Your Alexander " the great" invasion was as savage and barbaric as the Mongols invasion.
But, europeans like to have fake mental and moral superiority over the others
But the man known as Alexander the Great was also one of historyās worst monsters. He was a murderous, rage-filled, paranoid, alcoholic, religious fanatic who, on at least one occasion, showed a fondness for what today might be considered necrophilia. He murdered often, at times indiscriminately. He assassinated rivals a dozen at a time, slaughtered innocents by the thousands, and exterminated entire tribes of people. Itās no exaggeration to say that Alexander killed off a generation of Macedonian officersāveterans he needed to run the army he inherited from his father, Philip. Nor were friends and family spared; within days of taking the throne, he killed Philipās most recent wife and her new infant.

Which region is this cuisine?
china bro
although it's similar to my country cuisine
Peopleās Republic of China
The Mongol conquest of China was a series of major military efforts by the Mongol Empire to conquer various empires ruling over China for 74 years (1205ā1279). It spanned seven decades in the 13th century and involved the defeat of the Jin dynasty, Western Liao, Western Xia, Tibet, the Dali Kingdom, the Southern Song, and the Eastern Xia. The Mo...
you are Mexican?
which part,i mean,like Sichuan,Canton,North food
They are anglicans .Do you consisder them as degenerate christians too ?
Lu cuisine, Shandong province, Jinan
i remembered a funny video about Shandong
hello peopleš«š«
although the word "soil" is uncountable, i read a sentence which says (( Soils also store water, preventing flood damage))
why?
chatgpt knows
-soil is uncountable that's true
-soil means ground in general
-and soils means different types of soil
like
-water means water in general and it's uncountable
-waters means water bodies, many rivers, lakes in together
in conclusion " soils" means different kinds of soil(talking about all the categories of soil)
thanks alotššš
hii
I never considered the Macedonians Roman, but they founded new cities in this war that became important, such as Alexandria in Egypt. It also brought Greek culture with new colonizers from Macedonia and the Aegean islands. The Mongols instead plundered, exterminated, and burned the villages of Eastern Europe; they don't really cared of Europeans
They have retained many aspects of Catholic doctrine, but do not recognize some of the seven sacraments. They too separated for political reasons, they have partly degenerated
Some of the most fundamental ideas and technologies in the worldāpapermaking, printing, and gunpowder manufacturing, among many othersāmade their way across Asia via the Silk Road. Migrants, merchants, explorers, pilgrims, refugees, and soldiers brought along with them their disparate religious and cultural ideas and domesticated animals, plants, flowers, vegetables, and fruit as they joined this gigantic cross-continental exchange. As historian Ma Debin describes it, the Silk Road was the original melting pot, the lifeline of the Eurasian continent.
Knowledge of gunpowder spread rapidly throughout Asia and Europe, possibly as a result of the Mongol conquests during the 13th century, with written formulas for it appearing in the Middle East between 1240 and 1280 in a treatise by Hasan al-Rammah, and in Europe by 1267 in the Opus Majus by Roger Bacon.
wait
They allowed female priest .
Isn't that a degeneration according to catholic doctrine?
how do we have a similar friend
How did the knowledge of gun powder reach europe?
Yeah, through the mongol conquest .
Large unconnected remote civilizations were made immediate and near by the silk Road established by the mongols and there were rapid exchange of ideas, cultural syncretism and knowledge
nah
yea thats the point
like i know him
but she dont ig
its been like two years
where's chinese dude?
@feral river hi dude
my phipino friend said China just claimed the south china sea but it really belongs to fipino and it's name must be west filipino sea
What do u say?
its not
where did u met with her
so u talkin to each other regularly
cant remember but
its must be beluga server or smthn
thats a rare situation
say hello to her from me
Hi #šļ½report-help, not sure if this is something worth a tag, but i was just wondering could you rename the voice chat "vegans are better?" to "veganism is better?" or something, since otherwise its creating that feeling like some are better than others while its not the point of veganism, it makes people defensive and offensive
Thanks in advance for reading
U chat here
Okay, gunpowder came here with the Mongols, and this helped us conquer the whole world later, but the Mongols massacred our populations, we won't forget that
guyzooo
Does this mean a guy that is a zoo or a guy in the zoo?
Fair
can someone tell me what padre is on about??
U can just ask me
:)) did u watch that British boy
It's like memes :))
oooooh whos that exactly?
PADRI
āI Don't Do If's Buts and Maybes, I Do Absolutes, Mane Is The Best In The Worldā | Liverpool v 1899 Hoffenheim 4-2 | #LFC Fan Cam - Redmen TV are backed for the season by Ladbrokes. New customer offer...Bet Ā£5 get Ā£20 in free bets with Promo Code: RedmenTV http://po.st/Ladbrokes_RMTV
Terms and Conditions apply.
This Red thinks that Mane could ...
lmao i know it
Heyy
ı was waitin for u to say hi
Yeah
hru homie
Im good for seeing u, how about u??
hehe same
im a bit exhausted but nice
Was it a hard day ??
Aaaaaaaa stop bad wordsš§
My day was hard too, i had some exams and a long way backing home
ooh
Now im relaxing
nice nice
Yeah
I see
I've read some chapters of it.
I didn't read the whole book 'cause it has over 3000 pages
do you guys have any idea how to improve social skills ?
If you're man, the best you can do is to improve your looks and try to be less shy
nah Everything has to have a limit hahaha.
Have you reached yours yet?
No like, i mean socials. How to talk what about to talk
The main problem is to find some topic to discuss
I don't know about that either. If you will find an answer, tell me.
Hahhaah
I will find the solution š„µ
you can bring up some basic and common topics like hobbies and what do they do for a living
maybe after finding sth in common, you both can delve deeper into that particular topic
Its hard to discuss it for a while
language barrier?
No.. I just have nothing to say
i think you are just new in those voice channels
Maybe
I went to chill chat and got called Indian gay tf
ahh chatting not calling
You are probably right
lmao well, that's one of the sad parts that you have to deal online
It was anyway weird cuz im not gay and not indian
there're a lot of weirdos and creeps in this server
some may insult or make fun of you,solely to entertain them
you're from poland?
Fr
Alotta creeps
i've never thought that poland are rude and toxic
Fr - for real?
Yep
It depends
beware with some scammers as well
All my money is in cash gl to steal it hahah
Yeah you are right
Ill be careful thank you
And have a good one! See ya later
sure, have a good one
a feminine girl
So only having feminine orgasms make u a Perfect girl?
nah bro
He probably means submissive female
yeah
Hello guys
why your thought are so f ked ?
we will do it together with by gf
how come
Oh god
How can people be so uneducated about gender roles in 2024
Men when they donāt want to pay for a maid
guys what is wrong with u?
I just meant what behaviours or idk beauty standard u want ur girlfriend to have

well ngl i have pretty accommodating standards. i'd like to become a house husband, so my ideal girl has to be able to support me financially while i take care of our chillun
you were born with wrong gender mate
if u want that type of living u better become gay
and tell ur husband to do that for ya
now girls judges us on our preference cool
Some girls like trad gender roles and are submissive
Some dont
so what went wrong when i say
i want a feminine girl
What do u mean by feminine?
Itās not about you personally, but preferences doesnāt fall from heaven. Your āpreferenceā has deep roots that youāre ignoring
a girl who do not disrespect me , act calmly
and not muscular
The unconscious 
Carl Jung moment
Girls are so uwu~
that makes sense
Itās funny how itās never about a person itself but about how you want them to treat you
Itās all about you
Lmao yeah
You want this right?
a housewife
Rare to see it nowdays it modren world
man i don't care if i do these work or my wife
Itās actually really common
You can be one
I'm a boy
and that's a basic survival skill everyone should know this
hahaha
Regardless
I hate the concept of being femnist
whaat
Yes, welcome to the awakening
Me when I chose a stem major
what do you meant by deep roots ?
femmnism is teaching female that they can be an indpenent and perfect woman by just disrepecting men and become lesbian
Okay, the Trump in your name said it all. Youāre just uneducated on the subject
Most women tend to be in medical ( just my observation ).
Very low female to male ratio in cse in my college
And ur edcutaded on it
š
Women oppression is the eldest form of oppression, our conception of women and our expectations from them comes from centuries of patriarchal organization
tf
Your preference is not neat yk
Anime girl pfp and wee/woo pronouns...
Yes, gender stereotypes always puts women in ācare takerā categories
ur disrepecting me
Yes?

one of my favorite American tbh
Ok femboy
how tf is it not neet
men got attracted to feminine traits and that's because evolution
and listen what feminine girl guys wants are cute . not disrepectfull and carying
is that alot to ask ?
i like cute girls
Wtf
š¤
You guys bettet watch some Andrew tates video
white girls are craziest stuffs in the world especially in America
Thatās literally a myth lmao femininity is fabricated by society. You should read "the second sex" by simone de beauvoir, she debunks the biology argument quite excellently
@static pivot
No ma'am thank you
Okay
And omg youāre allowed to have a preference, Iām not telling you what to do. Iām just offering a critical perspective
the thing is moder women think doing house chore
is that they are snatching their freedom .
but that a basic survival activity . ain't males who live alone do this ?
actually latina
Cuteness will degrade over time( ageing) .
You have to spend your whole life with her.
So,Personality and being an educated person is the ideal.
im getting older too that's just what i want now
You're one?
I think physical appearance is the most important thing
i wish but im a guy
To all feminists out there
Being rude and aggresive and generally unpleasent
does not make u a strong woman
It just makes u annoying
none is feminist here
Duck you
Aren't you a feminist?
Emma is
The problem with domestic work is that itās economically exploitative. They work and donāt receive any money, and by that sheās completely depended on a men. Domestic violence, abuse, psychological terror are all violence that gets them more vulnerable to live. Plus itās so hard to get out of those environments
no
Emma is just a right wing
Average looking or very attractive?
Youāre offending me. Iām a radical leftist
okay left ma'am
Lmao why so sarcastic
what the duck is wrong with u
Can i not have a anime pfp as a boy?
Exactly!!
would left radical?
A looking that can attract me, I mean, if you are cute it means you have a healthy body ready to host future offspring
There's usually a direct proportional relationship between being attractive and being dumb
can't understand
I thought the left was particularly conservative.
U closed minded
Thatās all you ask? Youāre as empty as your preferences
Thatās controversial
everyone like beautiful face that's a point
Aren't you the one preaching Andrew tate?
Then you proceed to have an anime girl pfp
PICK A LANE
Sure. But is that enough?
i hate Politics and philosophy
I could tell
not enough
So you hate life?
Reza doesn't talk to close minded peopleš«µ
no i like it very much
i could enjoy musicals all day
Your mind is so close not even oxygen enters it
šŖ sit
What topic are you guys talking about
you are mean to him emma
LOLLL
Gender roles (specifically the female one)
Just someone casually preaching about Andrew tate with wee/woo pronouns and anime girl pfp
And I'm a lil confused
lmao
I think that the main purpose of human beings is to reproduce, advance the species and generate strong successors. By the way, Would you prefer a short, ugly guy, but with a "great" personality or a tall, muscular, handsome guy with a normal personality?
Oh but like what exactly?
that's their choice
Define a normal personality, not sure about that
No it's not
im a straight man but i don't really mind them
I donāt want to reproduce, Iām asexual. Not sure Iām the best person to answer that
A person with whom you don't get bored, but with whom you don't have fun, practically neutral
asexual?
Thatās not a personality, thatās how I feel about them
Yes, it means I donāt feel sexual attraction to anyone
Having resources( money ) is also an important one .Some women will choose ugly short guy if they are rich
Personality influences these factors
and ur mama is so slow it took her 9 month to make a joke
which means you can like everyone but you won't fell in love with them
This is true in most cases
Thats the base desire but we have evolved a little out of this and have more sophistry to relationship than just breeding and making babies
and means she's gonna be single for all of her life
Ooooo so you have 0 sexual desire no matter what? Or maybe itās just really low and you havenāt found that right person yet?
that's what I'm talking about
idk why people are now normalizing the mental issues like this
Trust me brother, personality and intelligence are a side thing
someone literally could be like this
Wym? Romantic and sexual attraction are different. You can love someone without smashing. Also, asexual people do sexual acts sometimes although they donāt feel sexual pleasure from it
i don't know how do you think about it @sonic lion
I think itās more about feeling repulsed by that level of intimacy. I donāt know tho, romantic love is acceptable
Every girl I know prefers a tall, rich, muscular guy, maybe blond, and trust me, their physical appearance will also define their "good" personality
Ah. You arenāt asexual then. Asexual people donāt feel sexual desire at all. I think youāre capable of it, but as you just said, youāre repulsed by the thought of it. Asexual people arenāt repulsed by sex. They just donāt feel anything towards it

its a side thing If we are only going by base primal desire and sex .But, the point is , sex and making babies is not all there is to relationship
god damn who says that women should not work outside .
my point was that moder women think that doing house chores is a patriarchal thing .
and about domestic violence does only women suffer that ?
what the duck u saying
how come a person's physics body can afffect on his prsonolites
Read my previous message
which one ?
i think you just didn't find the right one in real life so you think about it you are asexual
Yeah, this is true for most of the girls i guess
Okay. I mean, theyāre both fine to me, I donāt care about height or muscle but the beauty factor is important I guess, Itās nice to date someone you think itās cute
In the eyes of others, they will have a good personality only because of their physical appearance, they will find them interesting only because of their physical appearance, it was an irony
nah ur wrong
Maybe
I would feel repulsed to be in that situation and I also donāt feel anything from sex. Seeing it itās boring but actually doing it would be uncomfortable and repulses me
Thereās no such a thing as a right person, you guys are too romantic
oh u actually don't believe it u mean some girls think like that right?
And also remember that morality has aesthetic standards
well i think God knows because I'm theist
Many of them think this way, those who don't think this way are the ugly ones
In what sense ?
Yeah I understand. But the repulsion feeling happens if you have a very negative view towards it or you had something traumatizing happen to you in life, especially involving anything sexual. I still do think that if you find the right person that you deeply love, that feeling towards sex can easily change. For example, I know of a fair deal of women who have almost non existent sex drives, until they get into an actual loving relationship, and soon, their sex drive really spikes. I do believe that plays a role in your situation
Thatās cultural I suppose. Plus, guys with power and money will always choose a young and beautiful girl. Both men and women have preferences driven by culture
that's fair enough
Only the uninitiated un-platonic hylic people care more about physical appearance 
just how this world works
it's better a person who is asexual does not comment on this topic
You could be right, but I feel no sexual desire at all. I donāt think that would change by romantic interests. I view romance as emotional connection and nothing more
And my response to that, when I say the right person, I donāt mean that one right person out of billions of people worldwide. Thatās not what I meant. There could be thousands of right people for you. Who knows. Iām just saying if you found someone youāre deeply in love with, your repulsive feelings can easily change. Thatās all
Lmao thatās nothing to do w me
To make you understand how important physical appearance is: would you kill a cockroach or a butterfly? Killing the butterfly would not be socially accepted, you would be considered a bad person, on the other hand, if you kill the cockroach, you'll be considered as a hero. Morality has aesthetic standards
Traits regarding looks are desired by what I call "genuine attraction" - the desire of one to have pleasure with that person.
Whilst money and personality enters the "negotiated attraction", what a woman is looking for on a long-term relationship.
Both are important and are related to evolutive aspects of the human being.
like Mexican would go to marry an American,and southeast Asian want husband from hk,Japan stuffs
Thats a flawed morality ...Going on its natural conclusion , this king of reasoning will justify killing ugly people or races which you deemed unfit or ugly
Maybe repulse is not the right word, but I would hate to be in the situation. I hate being touched and all, maybe bc Iām neurodivergent
I do agree they are different, but they relate. When you two really love each other, intimacy is like the next step. It could honestly be a pretty enjoyable, loving act. Purely out of love, with no intention of reproducing. I mean, thatās why condoms exist
Traits such as being blonde are desired because white people ruled the entire world in the last few centuries and whiteness resembles richness and social status in their minds. Nothing strictly biological but rather social
Hmmm so would you be against cuddles? Not sexual but a lot of touching
I saw long-term relationships formed by a dumb male and a beautiful, intelligent girl, the dumb guy had money and was handsome, looks is everything
Itās just disgusting and painful to me, not romantic at all
Of course they are. Looks are even more important than money. But both play a major role
And guess what, character and personality are useless
Not my cup of tea, Iām a really distant person in that aspect. But if I loved them I suppose I would be comfortable w their touch
true
Not to me
Personality plays a big role in attraction
I finally found my people
If you're a shoit person, people won't judge you much if you're beautiful. Looks overcome personality instinctively
The superficial club
Have you had anything traumatic happen to you, or have you been influenced a lot by what you see on the internet for you to develop this very negative view towards it? Or maybe you feel used for menās gratification?
So you would have a relationship with a deformed person, but with a great personality?
if you have money no one cares about presonality or sh it
Some do
Nope. Actually, sex is represented in media as this wonderful thing. I felt broken most of my life bc of it
Who?
Most people who say that don't pick an ugly but interesting person over a beautiful one whether they are women or men
They do it for the meme
What?
Idk maybe
I mean what you were saying is also true for some but not all
I'm just a realist, realistically a person would never be with another very ugly person
Then I do think it could be just not finding that person and not being in that sort of position. I do think your view towards it could slowly change over time. And yeah the touching thing I know it definitely sucks, although thatās something you may get used to or even at a point enjoy with someone you love in the future
Itās okay to like beautiful people
My point is IS IT ALL you ask?
Hold on bro, a germanic guy with blue eyes is seen as God in many parts of the world
I don't disagree .
Iam saying there are exceptions
Youāre not a realist. A realistic person recognizes every aspect of the argument, every variable. You only see what confirm your already made point
and those exceptions are very rare sir .
don't ignore the reality
Only people with interiority complex
Thank you bro, but I don't want a relationship or the attention of females rn
Ik youāre trying to help but I heard it so many times. It doesnāt change and thatās fine to me
Sure saar
In Brazil, it happens all the time. I find it kind of sad
Aren't those exceptions reality too, saar?
So do I, I prefer to focus on myself
men going their own way! š
Those people have slave mentality then.
We do
A realistic person speaks from experience, I have experience in these things, and I have observed the behaviors of the girls I have met. You might be the exception, but this doesn't make you the majority of people, not even realistic
Itās not really something that can just happen, I know. Like anyone can say it to you and it wonāt change much. Iām aware of that. But also, you havenāt been in that situation to actually feel non-repulsed or even to enjoy it. Thatās why Iām saying in the future, if you meet someone youāre super close with for a few years and absolutely adore, then those feelings of repulsion will probably go away. That wonāt happen anytime soon, but in the future. BELIEVEEE
Unfortunately, that's what happens here. Whites in Brazil used to be lords and socially they're still seen as that
Thatās being realistic? Thatās the opposite. Your environment does not dictate reality
And your observations are not impartial
The asian will be the new master in town š
Itās rooted in your subjectivity
It's the best choice rn, time to time, the perfect girl will find me
Soon
I thought not wanting to be intimate to someone was something normal, no need to use this sort of label
If my environment is not reality, what is reality? By any chance unicorns and elves?
The great replacementš
I think itās normal too but people donāt
what Asian btw
Indians, Chinese, etc
Just like you who don't want that either. But as man... The roles change
Right, we don't need you
what town
Don't take it too seriously
bet
Is "men going their own way" another term for incel?
exceptions create with opportunity saaar
do you get that . that means a normal person would love some unattractive when
they did something good for them . do you understand dumbash saaaar 
So what happens if I go to Brazil?
Reality is unknown to us. But pragmatically, you could educate yourself with people who actually make studies in the area and critically analyze them and then forme and opinion. Being a realistic person is recognizing both sides of the coin and making a fair point, itās being skeptical. Your observations could be wrong and you seem only to want to confirm a bias
Lmao
You're wrong, saaar
Not everyone is opportunistic and cynical as you, saar
Yeah, must be harder for asexual men
I have read the first two lines of the message, and I abandon the conversation with you, your argument is fallacious, reality is something material and precise
Yes but unlike incels they have a superiority complex even bigger
So youāre a materialist?
listen exception doesn't rule the world
be real mate cya š¤
Even materialists recognize what I said but anyway
I must agree (also hi)
cya mate
Iam being real.
No, I'm just saying that reality is what can be perceived by our senses, all imaginary abstractions are not reality
So, you think that what's real is what we can/want to perceive ?
Nominalist heretic
i've been trying to understand what the topic here is 
In this world, in earthly reality, yes, faith is something else if you are asking this
No, I'm wondering if so people with mental issues are seeing a "real world" as you state...
If you go to Southern Brazil, you can pass as a local.
But tough question.
There is a reality but it will never be perceived by anyone
People with mental health problems are a statistical minority, so they don't count
I can understand
It doesn't make sense from an evolutionary perspective either, no organism needs or would be able to perceive all of reality
The real realism is idealism
So you think the Reality with a big R is unreachable ?
Just because it scapes our limited sensory capacity doesnāt mean itās imaginary abstraction. Color is something phenomenological, it doesnāt exist outside of our mind who canāt even perceive the whole variable of existent spectrum of light
It can't be, from an evolutionary standpoint already. We can see more colours than most other mammals, yet we still miss other waves perceived by most birds and lizards for example
I learned that if we could perceive radio waves, it would be seen and not heard
L take from a catholic
Yeah physics is so interesting
You cannot see behind you, a scorpion can, but a scorpion barely perceives depth compared to you
They are talking about that from a human perspective
Catholic materialism?
lmao
It's no different
I thought all the church fathers were idealist/platonist
No human will ever be able to especially because it would require new brain cells
That actually blew my mind because myy little overthinking brain realized that perception is everything
Reality with big R is God
Indeed. And all those modern philosophers opposed it highly
Faith has nothing to do with this, God is real because he manifested himself with Jesus (Jesus is god, and there have been testimonies that he really existed) so I can be Catholic using this rhetoric
As a brain student I agree, it drives me nuts
Wtf
I'm glad you can have faith in something
Saying abstractions and universal are just imaginary is against catholicism
That's an inherently materialistic position
He literally ignores all the evidence against his little points
What do you define as reality from a human perspective
I already stated it, it's always incomplete, what we perceive is reality but it's incomplete
Not a matter of faith
You haven't understood, Catholicism also overcomes these useless logical quibbles for the reasons I told you before
Oh really ? That's wonderful, I guess you're ripping our hair on some questions about our brain
It's your conviction at least
Not everything we perceive is necessarily reality, our brain is flawed and can create stuff
I'm heterosexual but practice celibacy voluntarily
And I also said I'm not materialistic
So why argue any more
That's why empiricism naturally leads to skepticism
Yes, sometimes those exist because we can't understand or perceive all of it, just like we can't see the true colour of many birds
So change your statement
I think we just haven't done that yet, humans develop themselves from era to era and discover what's new. Someday there'll be nothing left.
Biologically impossible
You need infinite capabilities
Machines can help us
Or to relativism
Machines are limited too
Relativism is the most concerning thing in postmodernism
No, I'm just saying that reality is what can be perceived by our senses, all imaginary abstractions are not reality
Lol
This is just empiricism and empiricism naturally leads to materialism
Simple minds seek simple answers
I don't know much about postmodernism
Trying to define reality is almost impossible
Itās a really interesting and vast camp of thinking
But quite annoying and hopeless idk
Also David Hume's black swan problem against induction and empiricism as a means of knowledge.
No amount of observations of white swans can allow the inference that all swans are white, but the observation of a single black swan is sufficient to refute that conclusion.ā
As if urs was that developed
Empiricism alone will always lead to skepticism
Yesss
True but at least Iām not pretentious
We're all here to learn. One is only simple if they have hit their maximux level on that.
Studying epistemology is a good way to question everything around you
Are you an philosophy undergrad student?
Iām here to critique
Criticize*
Both works
No
It'd be "for critique" I think
Primitive men observed by senses that the sun comes up from the east and set to the West .
But, the Sun is stationary relative to the earth and it's actually the earth that rotates and revolves around the sun
Sense perception can always be mistaken
Barely know anything about philosophy
What's your field?
Psychology and neuroscience
Yeah me too
Critique to me sound more like a noun than properly a verb to be used after 'for'. Anyway, that doesn't matter much we all make mistakes
Oh a French word
I donāt even care about english mistakes anymore
It's passionating in my opinion
Modern English is Germanic French
Yeah if you like questions results and fundamentals
Fair enough š
Me neither
It would drive me insane
Understandable
Mistakes happen in conversations like these
We're not on an Ielts writing task
And thatās fine. Gramatical rules only exists to stop a language for changing over time
I thought they existed because things need a pattern to function
Thatās absurd. Other societies without gramatical rules or even any form of writing still function
If a language communicates, itās functional
And I also explained that God is not an imaginary abstraction, did you read what I wrote? Do I have to explain it to you with pictures?
You said, "reality is what is perceived by the senses"
You seen to be not getting the logical consequences of your statement
Jesus is god, Jesus truly existed, therefore he could be perceived by the senses of the people of the time, ergo I'm right šš»š¤
Can you perceive God with senses?
I can say Iām Godās daughter as well, that doesnāt make me so
This is faith and it's something else lol
I also believe Jesus actually existed, but I believe he was a normal person
Faith is not based on logic or any material evidence, how can you justify faith in that perspective?
Then why do Christian mystic focuses on the Ineffability of God and the nothingness of God?
They even compared God with absolute darkness beyond all comprehension by mind
can't imagine that would be said by Emma
Gregory of Nyssa
Second fallacious argument
The Jesus you perceived is the Union of hypostasis logos and a human being
Thereās historical evidences for his existence. Of course it could be wrong, Iām still skeptical. Iām atheist still
Proof?
Hypostatic union
It's simply the Trinity, if you can't understand this I can't help you
The Trinity died on the cross?
okay interesting anyway it's surprising to see a left or right wing say stuffs like this
Why?
Only his physical image, not his spiritual one
Most historians think that a Jesus-like individual existed, it's not that absurd
It doesn't have to do with political orientation
because you are an atheist.
What kind of Christianity did you study lil bro?
No, I already answered what you are going to say
.
Just because I recognize the evidence of his existence doesnāt mean I believe heās godās son tho
In precise Christian terminology
where do u believe we go after death?
Can you perceive the Trinity with senses?
Death is just recomposition of matter
Without brain activity our perception simply does not exist anymore
Jesus =son and prophet of god
GOD=father ,the creator of anything
Okay? this 2 cannot be the same thing
If I am, death is not. If death is, I am not
It has nothing to do with it, you have to have faith
so ur going to literally nothing?
It is the Trinity, you Muslims cannot understand it
Yes
nah u vaticans cannot understand
Trinity is incoherent
Do all Atheists think the same?
I thought Islam was created because of its simplicity
Only Ontological subordination of the son makes sense
There are enough evidence of his existence based off oral tradition. The only "argument" that points for him not to have existed is the lack of documents in Judea / Rome. But, guess, there are more evidence pointing to His existence than to the one of Socratis.
I mean it lines up with neo-platonism very well
You know water? it can exist in three different forms but it is always water
His first mention on documents was made by Josephus, a Roman-Jew, in 90 CE.
But it's quite stupid to doubt he existed historically
whaaat
Ur telling me god is waterr?
Are u high?
I suppose so
But , it can't simultaneously be in three forms
No, I really can't handle this brother, it was an example
One logical flaw to your analogy buddy
Good point
But God doesn't have the features of water lol
Supposing he exists he could have all three forms at once
Forms mean distinction within itself
Having distinction destroys simplicity
I mean metaphysical simplicity
Maybe you can't understand with what I said, but this image may be useful to you buddy
God doesn't have to follow any rule or law, it's not something natural
That's why Plotinus disagree with Aristotle on the Intellect being the first princiole
Because Intellect has object and subject dichotomy
And is not metaphyically simple enough
so are u telling me that the son raped his mother before he borned?
Knower and the known
no it's called parthenogenesis
A self cloning lizard doesn't violate herself to make a clone
What is that
Asexual reproduction
Then we can make up anything about what God is.
Incoherent
What is a mesozoic xenonationalist?
but wait in this logic god is limitless okay? so cannot be limited to only 3 forms? so maybe all of us and all livinging and unliving things in the world are God?
Yes, I'm an atheist so I agree
Xenonationalist is someone that is a nationalist for a nation they are not part of, and Mesozoic is the time period where reptiles were dominant and reached their diversity peak
So youāre homesick for a place that no longer exists
bruh it's just normal math problem
look
father=god
Son=god
Then the father must be son but ur telling me it isnit?ur being nonsense
If God is limitless in power why can't he limit his form lol seriously I'm an atheist but those conclusions are easy to reach
God is absolute One and there is no distinction within it
Yes sorta, I am a reptile xenonationalist of sort that misses those times
Thatās kinda cool

