#š§ ļ½serious-chat
1 messages Ā· Page 100 of 1
I mean
Nobody wants it, the only reason to have a gun is because someone else has it too.
the same thing happens with nukes
Yes such is the case for all nuclear powers in imperial periphery
I think because they donāt have it so they think everyone doesnāt need it
But actually nuclear power is an actual power
yes very true
the americans used the nukes on the japanese not for world peac
There is no doubt that nuclear power is powerful
only benefited themselves
no one needs them in the first place, tell me a single reason that doesn't depend on another human why you would want a nuke
Who has nuclear power who gets more powerful
They need a nuke for power
The power of destroying enemies
Like weapon development
okay, that's a reason that depends on another human
you are reinforcing my point.
xd
World is not 1 person
.
World is diverse, complicated
well explain why did america go for the developpment of nukes
nobody had it before them
Do you think if every country put down their nukes today that tomorrow USA will put down their nukes forever
they were the first with the gun
Yes exactly
that's why people want guns because others have them, because that gives power, and you don't want to not have power, alright?
Thatās bullshit, only few countries has nukes, nuke ensure the security and stability of the globe but they didnāt realize
Because Iām able to destroy you, forever based on nuclear power
I am asking Gaia
So they wonāt start war against each other and both goes to death
because they are imperialists, and how every megalomaniac wants to control everything
Minecraft I am agreeing with you i dont think you know what i mean there
Thatās a pretty wrong perspective.
exactly u just renforced my point
Yes true
They are nothing compared with a nuclear power
Canada is somewhat pinned by American influence, that cannot be doubted, but we still have a lot of choice.
okay, and you think that's okay?
america wanted nukes because they are imperialist power hungry fools
or not?
and make everyone race for nukes
We donāt have nuclear power but our closest alliance is the worldās most influential and powerful country.
not alliance
people want power because someone else has it
more under their thumb
It is the constant search for power
They have a great amount of influence but thatās exaggerating it too much.
when america imposed tarrifs on their allies i couldnt believe they would treat economic (partners)
like that like enemies
Canada has some sanctions on the U.S.
That point is undeniable.
they just think they better than everyone else and have to protect their economy first
But our relationship with the United States is still quite healthy.
no they dont
Um, they do.
on what
I forget but I know they do
Our relationship with the U.S. is still more healthy than unhealthy.
We get many benefits for being scrupulously close with them.
That list is incomplete.
healthy for US
so your governemeent website is incomplete and not updated?
Lol
you guys really should throw trudeau out
Um no?
AnB you are so great lol
he really embezzled millions of taxpayer dollars on vacations
There was a literal thing that said (on the government page) that they had sanctions.
Fight stupid with stupid
Oh at least we can throw them out!
What?
what
AnB you are marxist? I can invite you to good marxist Chinese study server
If you want
We had a good conversation before you started to kiss america shoes
i dont understand why you changed your views so quickly
not marxist chinese
i dont believe in marxism that much
I am not kissing the shoes of the U.S.
Ok, that's ok
socialism yes but not marxism
I am just in favour of fundamental human rights, and good governance.
such irony in a single sentence
you can not have good governance with human rights
Pardon? Iām not following.
impossible
In China, it would seem so, but thereās clearly not the latter or former.
Yes, naturally it took bad governance to lift 800 million people out of poverty in 40 years
Iāve talked about that before. It is impressive, no doubt.
However, China still remains a totalitarian nation with many questions on human rights and development.
Itās 10:47 p.m. for me so Iām trying my best not to turn this into a debate.
But it seems inevitable as weāve grown up very different, and in countries with basically polar ideologies.
Im sorry what?
I hope yk, it wonāt concocte hate or anything like that.
China obviously doesnāt have good governance and human rightsāit doesnāt even have one of those.
the respect of Law, Social Order
when u dont have those
your society is doomed to fail
šš
yes america has
^ I should go I respect your opinions but I whole-heartedly disagree with some of your opinions.
capital riots
In china its unbelievable that the parlement of the state would be overrun by traitors
I agree but probably not for the same reasons.
you simply cannot have people rioting and protesting against the government
the government does everything to help the people
and when the people scream inequalities or some bullshit reason to riot
they are ungrateful
It will depend on the type of government, right?
yes
I doubt that a government like Thatcher's would have worked like that.
mainly with a woman who called parasites to people who received social assistance
u aint a beginner
anarcho-communist
interesting concept
not to offend you but it wouldnt work
Peter Kropotkin is a good author on the subject
in an anarchic society, there isnt rule of law
and can you make sure everyone has equal assets riches
Abolition of capital is only possible under guidance and supervision of the vanguard
impossible
There is no state, which does not mean that there is no law.
Or dictatorship of the proletariat
capital is good and bad
then it cannot be communist
Yep
how will you distribute ressources evenly
if you dont have a govrnment
humans are greedy creatures
And how will you protect from external danger like invasion
Or internal like counter revolution
It would be ideal if we promote fair cooperativism and the redistribution of property
then it would just be communism
not anarcho
why did u choose to add anarcho anways
Not everything is achieved through centralization, it is a very historicist perspective.
who is we
we is someone or a group of people
and it usually is a governement
nothing is acheived without centralization
No socialist experiment has ever been close to success with out centralization of capital first
maybe you should review your political studies as you are quite misinformed on the subject
because with anarchism I mean a society where there is no monopoly of power, neither in the hands of the state, nor in the hands of the market, a society with a horizontal structure of power, different from the hierarchies that have operated in the history of humanity. .
Explain a horizontal structure of power
simply impossible
That is reductionism, how could you prove that it is so in all cases?
So there is governance but it's horizontal structure
a society needs a governement
Yes, the closest thing would be a direct democracy
How will you protect it from counter revolution and capitalist roaders
Surelly you will have worker's council to operate the direct democracy
your political ideology is simply unviable
Lol
I keep saying, give formal proof of that, otherwise you are going to make an error in your argument, because something has been like that does not mean that it continues to be that way, it is the is-ought problem raised several years ago by hume
Ah, the point is that people wake up and realize that this system is simply better, it will be the weight of the majority, to the point of forming an emerging society
- Impossible to redistribute resources equally without a government (not even centralized)
- Humans have evolved to be greedy. How can you prevent the amassing of ressources or power?
- If its an anarchic society, there isnt a rule of law therefore it cancels out your "communist utopia"
i could state even more points
Yes redistribution of resources is very important point
Do you think ants operate like a dictatorship? Or do you question power? No, they simply live that way, because there is no other way to live, they cooperate because that makes them continue, it should be the same with man
Especially in the case of mass production
Please dont dehumanize us by comparing us to ants
did ants ever go to space
- That is an axiom without semantic validity, there is nothing to prove it other than historical events.
did ants ever build suseful societies
Well, can you explain how redistribution and mass production will work
- that does not mean that culture cannot be altered, in fact it is already proven by studies that the majority of people are reciprocal altruists
please educate yourself before pulling out words you dont even know
Without a state
- I suppose it is valid from a Marxist perspective to see it that way, but I repeat, I am not a Marxist.
AnB is not marxisr
i have simply never seen anything like this in my life
Reciprocal Altruism (or Reciprocity)
Reciprocal altruism (according to Trivers) is altruism that occurs between unrelated individuals when there will be repayment (or at least the promise of repayment) of the altruistic act in the future (Trivers, 1971). (Hamilton objected to this use of altruism, and suggested āreciprocityā instead). An example is mutual grooming among many birds and mammals. Mutual assistance between members of different species is called mutualism or symbiosis (e.g., cleaner fish clean the mouths of larger fish, which in turn refrain from eating them).
That is literally a fallacy, bacteria did not go to space and some lived a million times longer than you and any of us.
how is that a fallacy
its simply a fact
and comparing us to bacteria is again dehumanizing
what does that have to do with anything
That you are stating that something is like that simply for the sake of it, is how the axioms of arithmetic, mathematics is in part a conventionalism, this is proven from Gƶdel's incompleteness theorems, if you want I invite you to read about metalology
that we share different points of what a successful society is
how is 1 a statement without logic
I am an ethical naturalist
you simply dodge all my questions and arguments by saying they are illogical or flawed
if you refuse to communicate or explain your points using logic, there is simply no point in discuss anything further
I remind you that I don't speak English, I have to translate what you say to answer you, that's why sometimes obvious questions are because I'm going one by one.
It's obvious that you don't know what semantic validity is, so have you ever studied logic?
metalogy isnt even a word
traduction error
metalogic**
metalogic theory
metalogic, the study and analysis of the semantics (relations between expressions and meanings) and syntax (relations among expressions) of formal languages and formal systems. It is related to, but does not include, the formal treatment of natural languages.
????
language?
please dont attack me using flawed arguments
yes that is the definition of metalogic
pulling out unknown words from an unfamiliar domain isnt pertinent
in this conversation
we are talking about socialpolitical
not logic or language
you started the convo
so i thought you understand this domain
Let's see if we follow a theory of truth by correspondence, something is true as long as it has empirical validity, that is, it is verifiable, or it has logical validity, that is, the truth is contained in the premises. Kant already made this distinction long ago with the analytical-synthetics,
this has nothing to do with socialpolitcalism
please use a better translator
the gibberish you typed makes no sense
Saying that societies cannot function any other way because they simply function the way they do does not make logical sense, because it is not falsifiable in the first place.
ive never said that
please answer my 1,2,3 points above
probably because I'm talking about philosophy, which precedes any debate about politics in the first place, right?
using words and expressions from socialpolitcalism
.
how is whatever you said above anything have to do with philosophy
and only politcal philosophy has to do with politics
not philosophy itself
You literally said "that only works in fairy tales, reality is reality"
anarcho communism wont work
ive stated my arguments why
and you never answered them
you deviated from our subject talking about axioms and philo
goodbye its impossible to communicate through a translator
Ok, that's silly, to give just one example, the ethical system that validates is going to totally change how you do politics, the same with your notions of what is true and what is not, your notions of how language works, of how it is behaves. people, that they are a person in the first place, you can't simply separate a field from everything else and pretend that it is an isolated area, knowledge is multidisciplinary.
It is really possible but there is not enough time to do it.
Ooh, so what is the topic?
Thatās because they have nuclear power doesnāt mean that you have nuclear power
If you have nuclear power then you are capable to become your team leader not listening your boss
But we are the boss of ourselves
Talk is dead, I can have complex conversations in Spanish but the fact that it is in another language makes it more challenging
:/
I think there is no doubt nuclear power is powerful and who have it who has power to threat other entity and protect themselves
If Ukraine has nuclear power there is no Ukraine war
Hamas has nuclear power there is no Israel
Thatās pretty ez
If Hamas had nuclear power to bomb Israel they too would be affected due to their close proximity. I don't think it would work out too well. Then again, Hamas is known for engaging in the extremes for their cause.
Israel has nuclear power but excercises it wisely due to this fact.
Thatās true, but they wonāt easily do this since the war started
The war possibly never starts because both sides are nuclear power
They do have ability to destroy another one and itās literally no benefit for them, if they are under threat they will use them definitely for protecting themselves
And Hamas is an Islamic based group. Jerusalem and Israel currently have many Islamic landmarks they wouldn't want to destroy. Therefore, I don't think Hamas could bomb Israel without destroying the territory they want.
Just like allies used nuclear weapons against empire of Japan, to save millions of allies soldiers
No i think what @feral river means
is if hamas has nukes
it would use as deterrence against israel
bombing yourself is suicidal
just like why israel has nukes
to deter arab states from ever invading again
I think no doubt that nuclear weapons = absolute power
Idk why you guys debating on this
im not
what do u thing of anarcho-communist
Because they donāt have nukes and they donāt wanna be threatened by nuclear power so they promote dismantle all of the nukes around the world
i was arguing with guy
and he refused to listen to my arguments
only using weird words
Hmm
I see
if you scroll up
I would say what type of governance you think itās good
I feel like more governments would work if people had less of a tendency to be corrupt when given power.
yes in an ideal world
humans are greedy
simply in our genes
cannot change
if our ancestors werent greedy, they would have starved
Mm
well idk but starving "things" usually are greedy
doesnt matter if its a mammal or an inveterate
Monkeys prostitute their way out of poverty, while other monkeys hoard wealth
Mammals are inherently stupid
They will not cooperate or tolerate unlike their dinosaurian counterparts
I think in this case, J. R. R. Tolkien was right by saying, "If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier worldā
That's to say, if people were less greedy and more kind and had fellowship with one another, it would be a happy world.
Humans created dragons as a reflection of themselves and their deepest desires, but real dragons (reptiles) are capable of living carelessly unlike mammals
As long as people will keep denying their mammalian nature and wishes they'll keep falling for it, instead of fighting and triumphing over it everyday
Based, bacteria achieved things that we could never
My question is, why they are so good but world is under humanās rule š¤£š¤£
The world isn't under human rule
If it was mosquitoes would be extinct
If it was all the viruses and bacteria that negatively affect us would be extinct
If it was there wouldn't be competing human groups
Do you know what is live, what is rule
Humans are attention seeker idiots that play with big weapons to feel better about their physical inferiority
You are living doesnāt mean that you are ruling
There are krills in Antarctica that outweigh all humans combined
So we are not even the heaviest combined biomass
Arenāt that useful for human ?
work together and survive for millions of years, it is undoubtedly possible that if we continue like this, human beings will not achieve that
No
Unless we are able to leave behind our mammalian nature and copy the superior psittacin (parrot) lifestyle, which I think is perfectly possible since people do or did it in the past
Mosquitoes? Viruses that kill us? Bacteria that kill us? Cancer?
Thatās not you can make mosquitoes extinct because it has food chain on this planet if you extinct them you will be affected definitely
Humans aren't all powerful, they think that technology makes them superior. Most people can't build a dam, while a beaver can. Are beavers superior to most people? I'll say yes, despite being mammals they triumphed over their flaws and greed to build successful dam societies
You can eliminate some of them but you canāt extinct them
Humans already drove to extinction countless beings, they didn't drive mosquitoes to extinction because they're incapable of it, not because it's useful. Do you really think humans are responsible? Lol
Humans literally drained one of the largest bodies of water and a very important one too, the Aral Sea, they keep polluting and industrialising their own demise. They're not smart, they can't see behind their fleshy, non-bony mammalian noses
Human for themselvesš¤£
They are responsible for themselves
Not for this planet
And once humans will be too late to avoid extinction reptiles will rise once more and start a new Mesozoic
Human is actually always responsible for themselves not other stuff
Thatās the simple fact maybe you know that
They'll achieve the ultimate technology to reverse the age of the universe, saving not only this planet but the entire cosmo
Yeah so good luck to save the cosmo
idfc
Most people donāt care then
Because they failed to reject their mammalian nature
They live trapped in their own flawed frame of morality
Morality is not eternal, interest is eternal
Everyone cares interest, morality serves the interest for majority
Is that why Homo neanderthalensis went extinct? Lol
I think I donāt need any further explanation about this
Homo sapiens will join them as well, soon
Why would you think they donāt deserve to be extinct
Have you ever heard of evolution?
How is that make sense
Evolution means change of morphology and genetics over time, that's more about natural selection
Yeah thatās natural selection
Arenāt human part of natural ?
Human is not out of natural
Neanderthals died because they didn't embrace the parrot and beaver morality and lifestyle
Itās based on natural
Yes, they are mammals, and mammals are flawed
Unlike reptiles
Bro is drawing upon his inner Charles Darwin. I respect you.
You know thatās natural selection why would you say this
I wondered
Thanks, may the psittacin (parrot) overlords bless your bloodline and lead them to bioprosperity
Now I'm even making up terms
Because you want to save the world ? Save the every life being in the world ?
Is that what you mean ?
I think all animals are flawed in at least one way. That is what allows them to be killed.
no, it isn't up to me, I'm only here to give advice
If they werenāt they would basically be animal super soldiers.
Not reptiles, at least that's what they told me
I would say, human is human, be relax
Extinct is a normal thing on this planet
Just like natural selection
Most humans are servants of other humans and of vices, that's what stops them from achieving peace. Gaia gets it
It is biological but it can be stopped
They may made a terrible choice to make one thing extinct that damages their own interest
Reptiles are flawed in their size and lacking ability to take down larger prey or predators effectively.
But it doesnāt mean that itās not make sense
Oh why you think it can be stopped ?
Birds are reptiles, they can take down preys much larger than them at times... Also dinosaurs, so they were capable of that and could be again
Because I and other people rejected it
Probably she did as well
And yet one of the theories to their extinction is mammals stealing their eggs. A weak state for their young.
You can reject it thatās your freedom
And thatās my freedom to not reject it
But dinosaurs are alive today, and their species outnumber that of mammals by almost twice as much. If you add other reptiles alongside birds they're over four times as much species
I think they won in the long run
And I donāt think anyone who has no power could change this planet
𤣠pointless actions
Very much so. Although they do lack the ability that humans have which is to work as a large (somewhat) united community. I donāt know why I am arguing as this isnāt one of my strong suits. Also, my phone is bouta die so Iāll see you guys later! Night!
ooi
Goodnight! Parrots may form communities of thousands of individuals, although they do not build much because they don't really need it, they prefer to socialise
Thatās a threat to humanity
If you think you are a human and human or yourself is not important than other stuff
I have no idea
I donāt think there is no one not going to resist if another thing is threat your life and you say we need to protect them because if we do that they will extinct
Arenāt that ridiculous ?
We do not promote extinction of species because that will damage our interest that will break environment for HUMAN
For HUMAN not any other stuff
Thatās everyoneās interest, every single nation in the world
Thatās why we already have actual actions which ensure that our interest wonāt be damaged
But it doesnāt mean that logic would work on everyone has their different interests
For example there is massive surveillance in here and why we are not protesting why we are even promoting this ? Because we need security, we think security more important than privacy
But some people in other countries think their privacy has most priority
It canāt be stopped because those people can almost never came to power
The people who represent their own peopleās interests will came to power
A monkey canāt pay taxes, canāt vote.
Thatās why I said human is ruler here
Evolution is fake. Else nature must be sexist and misogynistic for giving us a hard time.
š¤Ø
Birth pains and cycles. Why couldn't mammals be something different?
Inequality is fixed in nature unless we can change with transhumanism, merge with technology
Xenofeminism or whatever it is called. Biology need not be destiny.
If I understand correctly, you're wrestling with biology and nature, asking yourself why don't we use modern technology to get rid of what makes a woman unique.....
Yeah, uniqueness doesn't have to do with suffering and pain. Merging with machines, I'd say, is unique making your biological impediments go away.
DO you think that was the aliens who created the life on earth? 
No clue. It gets circular. Who created the aliens?
Aliens are made by aliens
x)
This chain cannot go on forever. It has to stop somewhere.
We get the same question finally, who created that entity?
Ofc i don't know, i have no clue, just the fact that he exist a lot of mysteries about human evolution who supposed an intervention (by technology) but it's just a theory and all it's possible
If I put a gun on your head, you must admit what I say who is created entity.
Thatās absolute power
Thatās how rule established, thatās why regime exist
Only because one simple factor, power
You can establish nothing without power
And only less people do have power in this world
Thatās why some people always purposing dismantle nuclear stuff, weapons, borders, anarchism
Because they are not the people who is getting benefit from those
But their intention to achieve those stuff, is also for power.
Your purpose of benefiting the humanity or the whole world is another excuse for pursuing more power and enforcing your own personal thoughts on other people
And donāt think everyone is stupid, the people in west they know the people in Middle East they know the people in Asia also know it
Especially those leaders, and elites who controls actual power and they do decisions on what they are thinking
The biggest bug of democracy is democracy itself.
But I didnāt promoting authoritarianism, authoritarian have their own problems too. Some even terrible than democratic
I would say your death worth nothing.
if you died because of your belief, you are defeated
that's the same thing because my intention is clear out my enemy, and I give you a chance that you can live but you have to follow my rule
you didn't accept that offer, then you are dead
mission completed
I don't care what is your belief and you choose death or comply, that's not I was choosing, it's you
if you say that your victory is follow your belief so your choice is to die, then it's double win
the only fact in this situation is your existance is a threat to me.
no matter who you are.
I don't care, if you think that is not the end, then go
my intention achieved
that's all enough
I said It's clear if you think you don't fear dead then go for it
my intention is clear out of my enemies, and I did it
what is your belief are you going to heaven or hell, I don't care
are you saying that strength can't control people ?
I know that belief are able to control people
pick one thing I said is against them
I didn't say I was fighting against them
but I would say one thing is clear, absolute power can forcibly control some people and achieve my intention
do I make myself clear ?
I was not talking about control
I was talking my intention is eliminate the enemy
I don't need control
I need kill them
"Send these lifeless mad dogs to hell" Mark Arthur
you are trying to use your belief to confuse me but you failed
I was clearly stating that my intention
did I define which people were controlled ?
a suicide bomber ?
I didn't say that
I didn't even say 'control' thing
that's what you are saying bro
𤣠please check what you are saying and what I'm saying if you think you are objective
It's not the first time I said I don't care your belief.
my intention is important, your belief is not
what if I wanna destory but I give them another chance ?
why can't I ?
did I say anything about control ?
did I ?
it's you are saying this
not me don't put that on me
you think it was, but it's not.
did I make myself clear ?
It's not the first time I was saying my intention in that case, I repeated at least 3 times
and I have already gave out the furture information in that case
I don't know why you are trying to debate on something unnecessary to me
if you think it's hard to control a man with firm belief that he could be a suicide bomber, I agree with you
I don't know but you said you don't care and you jumped š¤£
I assume that, you win
W @wraith birch
gg for me
I remember that Japanese in WW2 says all of their people will start suicide attack against enemies but they are being bombed by nuclear weapons 𤣠𤣠š¤£
then surrender
pretty hilarious
actually Japanese suicidal attack is successful, but they still lose the war because the war is not you have spirit to death that you will win
and Palestine... they didn't even succeed to moblize all of their people.
cool
Then how are you guys using discord tho?
Just asking because I've been to china a month ago and nothing was working even with vpnš
maybe they allow discord there? idk
Nope, didn't work for me
At least where i went it wasn't working
huh
I used VPNs and DNS changer but nothing worked
maybe they have the most secure vpn known to man or smth
I dont know but i used many VPNs with free trials and nothing workedš
china people are stupid they are slave of government but dont do anything
That's why i asked him/her if he/she was really from china china
its Xi Jinping's kid
racist
I am of chinese nationality but i dont really feel like i was a slave tho?
your chinese slave microchip hasn't activated yet then
I was born and raised outside of china thoš
your parents implanted the microchip inside you since birth
All thing in china are slave of goverment not true?
What do you even mean by that
who is feeding you this information
Yea exactly
If you mean that everything in china is owned by the government then absolutely not
A company could be private or state owned
All social media are filter
If you want to protest they come with tank(i see the video from your protest in china)
All bank are conservativelyis controlled by government
What do you think hum is that not be slaving?
@azure whale Shut up sinophobe
For example alibaba and huawei are 100% private companies
"All Chinese people are brainwashed androids, all Chinese are stupid"
Shut up, you are sinophobic
Get out of here with your white saviorism
China has over 100 protests every day
How many times they come with tank or use violence?
Shut up you sinophobe, NOW
Thats social media lol
chinese people are great n all but the problem with their government is what they are doing in Xinjiang ngl
Ok go to visit Xinjiang
You only see 1 protest over a few thousands of protests on social media lol
the visa is expensive sorry i cant
14 muslim ambassadors has visited Xinjiang and seen different re education facilities / correctional facilities. Every muslim majority country endorses China handling of deradicalization
This protest have a result no!
The UN publish an assessment of China counter terrorism in Xinjiang
Nothing like what Adrian Zenz says
de-radicalisation? more like secularisation
I dont think you need to lock up old men to "re-educate" them homie
But is a real!
The United States government was asked to publish evidence of genocide of Uighurs in Xinjiang. They publish one graph showing that birth rates have be significantly lower since Xinjiang became part of China
There is no evidence of "cultural genocide," this is so stupid and ignorant, go to Xinjiang see the mosques the signs in Turkic language the Uighur language passports say the culture is being removed
I have been in Urumqi, all muslim majority country agree with me
Only USA and western europe condemn xinjiang deradicalization and only evidence is a graph!
Of declined birth rates
hmm... I wonder how the 15 thousand mosques were destroyed tho, must've been the rain, no?
if I showed you evidence you would say its sinophobic american information wont you?
In Xinjiang
If you show me primary source then I will believe you
If you send me sensationalized secondary source I will laugh at you
alright then
But I don't think you are sinophobic
Lol you country filtering the discord dont come there and support the government š
I think you are a good well meaning person, Sh3hri3r is blatant sinophobe though
Final assessment by UN based on ALL evidence
Just curious but where are you even from
From that name I'd say around the parts of iran
I didn't know Iranians were this racist
Me too friend
you learn something new everyday
Sure my country is not better than china and my country unfortunately friend of goverment of china
You are Iranian?
Yep
just what are you writing @dry lodge
Certainly not every Iranians are racist and this goes for all the countries around the world, but all the people around the western asia that I've met were all kinda toxic but this doesn't mean that every single one of them are like that
Was answering a call in reality
yea best avoid generalizing stuff
Well if i were you I'd watch your own country and stop criticizing other people's country without prior knowledge
š
Come on bro! You really like your country government?!?!??!
Never said that
And honestly i dont even care as of now since i dont even live there
And don't call all Chinese people slave
why don't you go criticize your country's government than others then
Racist
I criticize but i dont see my people of my country there!
Nationalismš
@cedar shuttle are you currently in mainland china?
No not current, I go back in July
Oh that's unfortunate
Do you know any ways to access google or stuff there?
All the people of this two country are timid and slave because dont want the exisiting government but dont do anything for get rid of the current situation!
Or i should just stick bing, bilibili amd wechat?š
Then go protest?
Why are you even here chatting if thats what you think?
Lol yes, I use mostly Baidu. But foreign VPN, Astrill is good
If you want to revolution you cant if another people are timid
Should try that then when i go back there
If you don't start not many are going to start tho
Try raxol vpn maybe work
Desire of genocide š¤£š¤£š¤£š¤£š¤£
Tried nord vpn and express but those didnt work well
hmmm how are we sure you're not getting paid by Astrill?!
Lol proof we don't want existing government?!?? š¤£š¤£š¤£š¤£š¤£
Didn't connect at all I'd say
Is there anyone desire of genocide ?
I do
Oh no, you find my secret š
They try my vpn i say ammm in iran is work dont know in china
Now i want a part of the shares you gain from me using astrill
Not many works there
Look at your people they are slave and want your government see the up comment from pollennnšššš
I donāt need even one who has must to be my enemy, no one needs.
And china is continuing improving their great firewall
If you will be my enemy I will kill you with no mercy
Lol we are slave if we don't want our government, we are slave if we want our government?!?!
You are just racist and we are slave either way
Honestly i dont even wanna argue with him anymore
I'd rather fight a losing battle than fighting an idiot
China government lifted me and 800 million other people out of poverty in less than 40 year
clearly a troll @dry lodge
Chinese government is working for majority of people unlike some minorities
You said we bring tanks, sure but you said your country goes directly with killing, you literally pointed the gun at yourselfš
Look at your people what sayššš
A troll is smarter than him
I can consider some people saying that they are suppressing Uyghurs, Muslims and religious people in China because majority of people, 91% of people Han Chinese supports to suppress them
That is true iran have so fucking poor dictator:/
I'll advise you to be a bit careful with your words, you can get banned if you continue on being a simpleton
And those Uyghurs Muslims they areindeed criminals
Thank you
Let me tell you something, you wont ever be able to find a government that satisfies everyone
Yes. This is true. But China has been good with rehabilitation and not punishment!
@feral river so are you currently in china mainland?
There is no one, no one likes a criminal
I say true when the people in china like there dictator is similar like north korea
Iām here ofc
Rehabilitate and not punish terrorist. This is why there have not been any terrorist attack in Xinjiang since 2017!
How are you accessing discord tho?
I've been there a month ago but wasnt workingš
But the china government attack taiwan soon
New lunar year
This is China
Hahah , Taiwan is already China, we don't need to invade China š
No but they can be dont play with people like dictator!
If that choice most people love, it will definitely happen
No matter what they are
Yes. China is dictatorship of the majority, of the people
I would say we care our people
Yes
Not yours, not Taiwanese
I'll stop answering because my time is more precious than talking to him
Those railing do be looking chinese
If one place of the world do false that is mean all of the world must do it?
They are closer than what u think
Who has power who do it
We are second most powerful state
If you do something on us, just eliminate them
Those trees are 99% chinese
Come then
Dare you can come in China
Come where?
what's keeping it from being 100%
When i went there they were planting trees and stuff and covered the bottom with that white stuff
What???
Gdp per capita in china is soo looow than another country if dont have human and natural resources come poor than iran
13000 USD ?
Are u high like last time?
Was saying thay if i had to guess where i was based on the trees, 99% I'd say we are in china
Thatās not bad because we didnāt have that much before
I just said arabs and jews are close
Oh this one u mean ?
-_-
Agressive for no reason chill
Is this a top secret @feral river?š
VPN
You must comparison past of your country with past of another country no with you alive or future!
Iām using VPN to access then
Which one tho
Which one ? u wanna join ?
I tried probably over 20 vpns and dns changers
it's NORD VPN! THE BEST VPN THERE IS!
Now be quiet , racist troll
Maybe false?
Didnt work
Join in what
I donāt use nord and expressvpn
Can pandas fly?
Those we'rent working well for me when i was there
Yes
You never know
Nord vpn didn't think you were worthy of it then
Well are you currently in mainland ?
Then why would you ask me for VpNš¤£
What is emerging?
If i go back there I'd need that for sureš
Developing
Show per capita hahahahš dictator!
The sleeping giant
I thought China was considered as a developed economy tho?
That is per capita idioy
Nope
Idiot*
If i was able to use discord and in china i wouldn't be asking you about that
Chinaās developing state
No
damn
China is still developing
isn't it like the 2nd biggest economy? I would consider that as developed
too many people
@azure whale Now shut up racist troll, don't spread lie about economy you don't know about
1.4bil people u know
Well being 2nd doesn't mean that we are developed
Stop caring about him it's just a waste of timeš
well. my vpn is a little secret you know... not just like buying services from public vpn providers.
You wasted probably a few seconds typing that
you guys should do culling initiatives then!
In ranking you are 72!
š
𤣠cool
People's Gucci š
š no socialism propaganda
Dayumš
darkweb vpn
Oohhh
Tor?
I thought about that at one point but acted against that
Better safe than sorry
I'll stick with bing and bilibili
Taiwan's official name is Republic of China š¤£

I can comprehend that desire of peace, but peace is based on those superpowers
if superpower doesn't want peace, no one will have peace then
so better listening up their voice carefully if their people in some small power nation and still wanna live.
aren't you guys know that superpower have that ability to destroy anyone ?
China has an upper middle income, developing, mixed, socialist market economy incorporating industrial policies and strategic five-year plans. It is the world's second largest economy by nominal GDP, behind the United States, and the world's largest economy since 2016 when measured by purchasing power parity (PPP). Due to a volatile currency exc...
With out freedom and economy who can give people medium life superpower is mainingless
please read this article.
makes sense considering China has over a billion people
Wiki pedia and the source in 2016? Lolololol
š š š since 2016 is source in 2016
really cool bro
maybe you need to study english first not economy sorry then
my bad my bad.
Ok i know it but when %80 people can support the economy come higher like usa
where are you from ?
are you from the United States ?
The country worse than chinaš
I would say China having just not bad economy but it doesn't that it has a good economy
It does make sense tho, we got over 1b people
Hey what are you talking about?
Yes but only in important city like beijing or shanghai
well most people in city like me, my family one person can earn about 10000+ CNY around 2000 USD per month
No matter usa have 400 million and the ranking is 4
what do you think about 2000 USD ?
Im sure he wontš
the chinese economy seems to get stronger since the last two and a half decades, by investing massively in production and worldwide, however some part of China economy seems to be fragile such has real estate
well... that's a huge problem but I think we are sovling that right now.
especially receiving aids from government
That is small! we live in poor people in iran and get around 3000!
aren't they currently experiencing a deflation problem or smth?
3000 USD per month in iran š
Why not?!?!?!
selling organs ?
Dayum thats high what part of china are you in? Like Beijing? Shanghai? Shenzhen?
drugs ?
capital of Shandong, Jinan
almost but not currently.
No my father is food contractor but sure most people in iran have under 1000 usd per month
just not bad 1000 usd
3000 iranian rialsš
Thats below beijing right?
The rial is come soooo worthless with this money you cant even buy a chewing gumš
That's inflation
The country continues to print money and it will become worthless
Super inflation you cant imagine it
I dont know that much about china tho
Not counting the last month I've been there, I think it's been more than 10 years since I haven't set foot there
With 10000000 rial maybe can come two private class session
Thats just how economy in certain countries is
Of course and in. China you cant support the economy too!or when you live in unimportant city you have hard way to live in city like beijing!
is an economy supposed to have inflation or deflation btw?
First you should improve your english because i couldn't understand half of it, secondly in big cities in china are actually cheaper than most European and us countries
That's hard to say, it isn't good to have deflation and neither inflation, I'd say the best one would be a slight and predictable inflation
If the inflation is too fast and unpredictable it's surely gonna hurt the economy
ah so a healthy amount of inflation then?
Acually in most european country they give 5000 7000 usd !
If an economy is in deflation that usually means that the economy is in decline
I live in europe i can fricking say its not true
Ive been living here since i was born and i know how things are like
In the us you have a higher wage but did you ever see the prices they got?
then if an economy's experiencing stagflation that means the economy's stagnating right?
Yea
Your worker in family dont get 5000-7000 monthly!?!?! What is his work!
His or her
Most families don't
Hello!
But my family in germany have this !
I am new to the server. Can anyone give me an mini tour of ths server please
Say this in general chat
Usually a person here in italy earns round about 1500⬠a month
1500 is a good pay already
!?!?!? Which city?!?!?
Ok kind sir. I appreciate your contribution
Every city here
With this you cant travel or have middle life
They do pay more (2000 is round about the wage but usually it's paid half in contract and half undeclared)
Rome can be the capital but the pay isn't that different and actually its not even expensive to live in
I've been there for an entire month and there's really not much difference between that and other regions (aside from florence and milan)
I dont know about italy but in germany cause of living so many people from iran is differend from this you say
Germany is different, Firstly their economy is way better than Italy's, and then one thing that you may know is that in germany they tip a lot
Maybe but the yearly saving money is mostly better than china or iran
But higher wages always implies higher prices
Thats for sure
There's a reason why some people move out of their country
But if you get a good job in either china or iran you can even stay there and earn big time
Yes! And thats is show importance of gdp per capita! Who you see migration from monaco or ireland or luxemborg or emirates or qatar or denmark and like this country with have high gdp per capita
Gdp alone is not important and migration show it
Well it's not always a good thing a too high of a gdp per capita tho, usually and increase in gdp per capita means that the economy is going well, meaning more employment and more economy going on, but it could also cause an inflation in market prices
Anyway gotta go have a driving lesson to attend
Also the best of this ranking experience show they can controll it but yes some country cant controll
only good thing for americans like they can produce their own goods like their price won't goes so much high than europe and most people having middle income
their own industry is full-grown and they are able to produce everything they don't need reliant on other nation
Chinese goods is cheap because of population and incomes, that means in our places it's more even cheap than oversea.
but at least we are capable to produce everything except some chips from taiwan and america
That's fair, but since GDP is that high it might cause issues or less precise distribution and require a lot more complex infrastructure, so other issues that go with it and need to be addressed might occur.
There's always a catch imho.
that's one of a major factor impacts people's living condition.
But not much that can be done about it on the other hand, considering the amount of people and size of the currently acting business models & approaches. It is as it is..
Nevertheless the best compromise to be made, probably.
who said that is not great if it feeds much people.
I just meant it's different, not to be judging.
I'm not judging just a statement relax š¤£
I am.. I think it's neither great nor bad.
It's what works, really.
gm everyone
In there is nightšš
Nice decoration
yo sup
Is this chat also used for serious proposals?š¤
Be or not to be?
Isn't it like 4am in chinaš
that is the question
This is not serious dude
Can someone help me with a reported speech task please?
@thorny steeple @lavish finch @craggy sphinx
sup sup
Will you actually help me this time?
Change the direct speech into reported speech: Lorena: "Did Pablo fly to London two weeks ago?"
Hi! š
Long time no see.
Same here, it's been a while since the last time I sent a message here in the serious channel.
I'm good, Alhamulillah. How about you?
Not by occupation, but by knowledge yeah
been good
Nah, I can answer basic questions about English only to be frank.
Try asking people in #šļ½english-questions
#šļ½resources would be better tho
Flare I will be back aur nice seeing ya
I mean you won't get a good feedback from a nativeš
If you want to improve your vocabulary, read a lot.
If you want to improve your familiarity wit the language, listen a lot.
If you want to be able to speak fluently and easily, speak a lot and do some tongue twisters, they are great honestly.
If you want to be able to spell words correctly with ease, write a lot, this server is a good place for this very purpose.
Realistically speaking it is more likely that someone advanced/fluent would be able to help you the best
A native was born and didn't even have to try that hard to learn it
For example flare who's fluent knows a lot about learning english
If i were to ask you how i should learn arab you wouldn't know many ways since you haven't tried any of them(or at least not many of them)
Ok maybe the arab language is a bit different
But a "normal" romance language would follow that reasoning
If you don't have a speaking partner, talk out loud to yourself, imagine a discussion with somebody and let it flow off the top of your head.
You can find many people to practice your speaking skills here in the server though.
š
That's actually what i doš
When im walking to work I'd just talk to myself in englishš
I'd put an earphone on one ear, fake smiles, fake head shakes and just talk to myself about random things
But works like a charm
I'd be amazed if they knew englishš
Italian
It's got some similarities to english so it's not too hard for me actually
Don't worry! talking to yourself is perfectly normal and can be even beneficial.
You can explain to your father in advance why do you need to take this approach.
Make sure you're doing it the right way, and work hard. The harder you work, the faster you'll improve.
Lol, bro! I do this all the time that my family sometimes sneak up behind and stare at me, but now it became somewhat of the norm for them. š
Depending on my mood, I'd either use the server (which I like honestly), or use Free4Talk, but I'm not using Free4Talk that often anymore.
Arabic, I'm an Egyptian.
It's a pleasure to meet you my friend. š¤
I can relate, try using either the fluent, advanced, or the lounge channels, there is a good chance you'll meet serious people there.
Obviously. Nuclear weapons are horrible, and it's sad that China is ramping up its nuclear program. Anyways though, we're still protected by the U.S. There are downsides, but it is worth being the closest friend of the only superpower.
I'm not really into debating atm, but I hope you at least recognise the consequences that may come from nuclear weapons. No one should be making more; no one should ever have to use them. Deterrence, I am thankful for, but the irony surrounding it is incredible.
True, but at the moment, the U.S. is no doubt the world's most powerful (if not only) superpower.
I see again your arguments are flawed
Currently, Russia possess the most nuclear weapons
And have made their nuclear forces combat ready
unlike the US
I did not say they had the most nuclear weapons. I said they're the world's most powerful (or only) superpower.
On a military stand-point, the U.S. is still incredibly powerful, more than even Russia.
Note too, the U.S. may be focused on militarism, but it does not revert to kleptocracy or have whole focus on its military. But it's still the world's most powerful military. Now, imagine for a moment, the U.S. went to war with Russia. The paradigm of focus on equipment and whatever would change for the U.S. economy.
I've spoke about no one winning before, and I don't doubt that, but I hope a war like that never happens yk!
Now, I don't think it's exactly a philosophical standpoint, and even if there are nuclear weapons, you can still be a superpower.
There's nuclear deterrence, but amidst that deterrence it matters to what capacity a country may be able to still do things that won't lead to world obliteration.
And it's clear in that gap, the U.S. is far more capable than Russia is.
I'm just north of the U.S. and we don't have nuclear weapons and we were never invaded.
It's better than not having one at all.
Sure, at that point you're just "pulling hairs on nuclear war's severity", but rather have enough bombs to destroy three Earths than twenty-five.
You were wrong then previously. "It is a well known fact that all the countries which didn't have nuclear weapons were invaded by the United States."
But on your question of 'why', I am not sure. It may be because Canada holds values that the U.S. respects, and it is certain that we aren't a threat.
I'm not even sure if the U.S. tried to invade other countries that might've disagreed, but did not possess nuclear weapons.
It is sad.
I don't want this to turn into an Israel & Hamas Conflict debate, and I didn't even want a debate to happen. I will not comment on that besides generically, yk, nuclear weapon is devastating for everyone.
All I'll really say is that I just want all of these conflicts to have happy endings (ofc that's subjective), but to me that just means people can get an education, have a family, have access to water, electricity, food, etc. In sum, just be human.
Would Ukraine, a country that most European people supports, have been invaded if they had nuclear weapons by Putin?
I don't think so. Nuclear deterrence would have stopped Russia.

Greatly said 
fr, people don't understand this.
I don't defend Israel, but I don't defend Palestine either. However, it's possible that someone defending Israel might win a debate. You never know! Unfortunately, parts of history may be falsified, but that is insignificant in this case.
But yk, there's already so many uncertainties surrounding current events in that war, that you wonder how much of the past or distant past on this conflict is still missing or wrong. I'm going to avoid commenting on your other comments.
What I find funny is that my school had a protest supporting Palestine but like I swear, 60% of ppl only went bc they could skip school.
I'm sorry, but you're really just trying to force questions into me as if I was an owner or wielder to the answers of any one of your questions. š
You clearly are.
You're referring your questions in a way as if I was a person with the answers to them. Thus making it seem like I'm part of that group.
Oh, I'm not ignoring them. I recognise your opinion, I'm just trying to avoid a debate at night.
I don't because I don't support that side. I could only guess.
No, but you're clearly trying to lure me into a question that is a trap.
I don't know.
Do you?
Plus, that question you asked was part of a longer question you asked: "You guys consider those who say that homosexuality is a sin as criminals
But do not consider those who occupy land and kill children, the elderly, and women
With a criminal?"
Your use of your guys implies as if I'm part of that group.
When I've made it clear I'm not.
I say I don't know because it's a very general question. Normally, killing like that is wrong.
But you're obviously trying to politicise this, and even if it isn't that, there could be exceptions so I don't know!
You're obviously wrong.
Please, stop making false assumptions or interpretating what I'm saying wrong.
Just because I don't wholly support Palestine doesn't make me an enemy does it? š
I'll just say my opinion on this conflict bc it'll clarify things.
Obviously. I don't know why you'd bother asking yk.
I said I don't know because there were exceptions and whatever. You didn't like that answer.
I already said though, killing is generally wrong.
I don't know where this debate is going..?
Please, be more specific. š
I'm obviously not a teacher. I don't know what you mean by "the killers not criminals."
It is unfortunate that you're using one s.s. to reason, when you've seen the whole message.
I clarified later by saying "killing is generally wrong" and went on to say that I said that because there are obviously exceptions to that. However, I know you're talking about this Israel and Hamas conflict, and in that case, I believe it is wrong.
I'm still not sure if anyone who kills children, women, and elderly are criminals. There might be exceptions?
Where is this even going at this point... š
I literally just clarified.
"However, I know you're talking about this Israel and Hamas conflict, and in that case, I believe it is wrong."
That was in general.
There might be exceptions outside of the Israel and Hamas Conflict.
I said I wasn't sure.
But I could try and find one maybe, one second.
Oops. I don't know.
You probably think I'm being heartless rn, but I really don't know.
There could be exceptions. Idk. I say that because I think of extreme cases of cannibalism or something (not like there was an exception then).
But I don't see anything that says that there aren't exceptions, or that there are any.
Kk, I need to word my message carefully.
You seem to try to make me look like a villain, that's why.
Basically no one does.
That conflict, and others that are around Israel and Palestine are subjective. Calling it a 'massacre' or 'injustice' might be wrong. Some people will say you're wrong, and countries like Israel also may. I agree though that what Israel has done is terrible, and disgusting. I also agree that so much of what they've done and are doing is illegal. However, that's not to say the other side hasn't also participated in abhorrent activities.
I was just being more precise. Practically, murder is very wrong and disgusting.
Children, even more so. But there could have been exceptions in history?? Idk.
But this goes well with the last thing I'm going to say bc this is getting out of hand!! š
Need to be careful with what I say, you take it too literally, and with hostility too.
It seems natural, but it is still wrong.
Sometimes they do! Although, Hamas is clearly bad.
This conflict is soo opinionated in a lot of ways. For one, I didn't know anything about it until it happened, so it brought a lot of awareness.
Ppl might argue that the two-state solution might be promoted even more from citizen pressure (or that it's gone for good due to abbhorent actions from both sides).
Cherry picking does no good. I've criticised their actions before too.
"I agree though that what Israel has done is terrible, and disgusting. I also agree that so much of what they've done and are doing is illegal."
Very nice when addressing Israel?
It might just seem that way as you're just talking about Hamas.
A resistance is good, but certainly not one like Hamas. But one could say it has led to a lot of awareness on this conflict, and a better chance for diplomacy (but then again, the abhorrent actions of Israel and Hamas contradict this view).
I can't say with certainty either on Hamas. Perhaps a prosperous Palestine might emerge because of it? I don't know.
Or, the possibility of a two-state solution is gone for good.
They've harmed children, women, and elderly people, and so has the Israeli military.
There could have been better results maybe? Uncertaintyy.
Um, I have two things to say.
Clearly, you're taking my comments too literally. Or you're twisting them so as to fit your original perspective that I supported Israel. Calling me a liar doesn't do much either as the horrible things Hamas and Israel have done have plenty of primary evidence. You revert to not blaming Hamas for their murder because "I blame the primary cause of all these events
The criminal Israel"
Yet, you said "I blame Hamas if it harms a child, a woman, or an elderly person" which they've clearly done.
Honestly, all you're doing rn is creating unnecessary polarity. I love seeing polar sides: extreme supporters of Israel and Palestine or whatever, but atm it's unhealthy. Stupid assumptions on me, and then making contradictory statements. What's more is that you're gripped on your one perspective. Peace will not come by wishing to vanquish and destroy one side wholly and entirely--no, definitely not in this case yk! You took my beginning comment of peace, and common humanity, and turned it flip-way-up into some idek, amalgamation that makes it seem like I'm an Israeli supporter so you can punctuate and punish an extremist Palestinian view. š
That's all I have to say. Please, be more open-minded. Supporting Israel or Palestine wholly only adds to tension. It's people (extremists) who create unnecessary borders and dividing frameworks. It's a path to hate, yk. That's not the path to peace, and it never will be.
Goodnight. ā¤ļø šļø
š¤”
His whole ideology is centered around the belief that "conflicts end when the other side is smashed to nothing š„"
Which is not only ignorant but also disingenuous
There is no more deaths if you guys all surrender š¤£š¤£
I wonāt care what you guys think anymore because every peace deal in this region all being rejected by you guys
Because you guys donāt want a Jewish state in that region
Are you describing 1sr4el?
Iām talking that every peace deal rejected by Islamist
For Israel, they pursue what they needs, is eliminate all of you guys no matter what
Itās all clear and we all know that, so keep it going
No one likes terrorist
Just like our nation cleared out all of terrorist in Xinjiang and no more terrorist attack since 2017
Ok so, you really have no idea what 1sr4el has been doing to P4lest1ne to say these kinds of distorted things.

