Trophies should be based on damage instead of kills

[bleak crypt]

This is the main idea of the post, and I will state in this post what my idea is in more detail.

[frigid crag]

has been posted before but good idea

[sleek marsh]

maybe 50/50 damage/position, not outranked/deadby

[bleak crypt]

I have a few ideas on how they could be calculated

when a non-bot player dies, a certain number (example: 100) of their trophies go into the handout pool.

when the match is over, trophies are distributed by who dealt the most damage and who survived the longest

[sleek marsh]

that not calculating/

[bleak crypt]

I'm not sure what the exact ratio would be so let's use 50/50 for now. this means that half the trophies you would get would be from how high you rank, and the other half would be from how much damage you dealth (assuming you got the same amount of trophies from both)

[sleek marsh]

(*ab dunk, from-bot-dead) definetely no, cuz teamers

thats mean 5-people team be able to boost someone

[bleak crypt]

that makes sense

[nocturne basin]

Wouldn't this force you to play more aggressively instead of strategically?

[sleek marsh]

thats, should be

[bleak crypt]

I don't think so, it would mean that people would not be targeted as much because they are low health

[sleek marsh]

also no

1 kill, is still 1 kill

100%, 5%, 1% health - no matter

[bleak crypt]

but 1kill from a low health person is not as many trophies

[sleek marsh]

I will not leave the enemy behind, even if he is wounded

[bleak crypt]

not everyone plays like this
alot of people try to avoid conflict do they can survive longer and only try to kill people who are low health so they can get me pre trophies

[sleek marsh]

ok, 3 players left ( with you ), 1 - 10% healt 2 - 100%. Which target first, if the same to shoot affordable? length to enemy 1/2?

[bleak crypt]

I would shoot the 10% health person because if I kill them it would replenish my rockets

[sleek marsh]

thats only one of reasons, why wounded targets much perspective.

[bleak crypt]

it's good for strategy, needing to choose between surviving longer and inflicting more damage

if one option is always better than the other than it's not balanced

[granite dune]

if your kill gets stolen then thats too bad, but at least you know they died

I don't see a problem here

its a fight to kill the top person not hit them and run away

[plain river]

it makes sence like you got 10 assist but no kills then the game would not count all those assist and you would probably lose trophies

[bleak crypt]

alot of the time it's fight people will low health to get more trophies because it is worth it to get more kills than to kill the people with higher health and risk dying and getting les trophies

the problem I want to solve is that it is better to only attack people with low health because you are more likely to get kills and less likely to take a lot of damage

[sleek violet]

FACTUAL STATEMENTS

[fading mirage]

Calm down!