#Polls 5.0
1 messages · Page 10 of 1
Ngl I use a combination of both siril and pix
why would aliens wanna come here
If they’re aliens I wanna nuke them
pretty please ❤️
We look so hard for intelligent life outside of earth because there isnt any inside ❤️🩹
aliens would be natural though
If they're aliens they're pretty smart
Disguising themselves as a natural object, going completely dormant as they pass through the solar system on a perfect tour, and not landing on a potentially hostile planet
How’s your weather right now
17
32
2
Completely Cloudy
Ok... debatable. Right now is definitely more fun because I can get better cleaner data. But when I started it was a different kind of enthusiasm. Ngl, I miss the night of just looking trough the telescope and having the time to actually image. Right now the fun is cut because of work and other things. Sucks to be an adult
same
siril for stacking and pix for everything else but since its a free trial i'm going back to siril soon :(
It's a different kind of fun than when I started
seeing jupiters moons for the first time was such a wow effect. i cant replicate it
It'll probably feel more fun than when I started when i get my hands on a big ass dob
fatdob
same
u want more nebulae or galaxies
neb
585 more ha sensitive
its minor
not enough that I care
plus you lose some of that compared to the 533 cause the pixel difference
u gonnna get sharper pics cuz smaller pixels too
this is one of those polls that are kinda dumb, you will go with your own choice anyways
its like flipping a coin and realising the other option is the one you wanted
i like to hear other perspectives
so you go for that instead
My current rig sure beats the 3" f/8 hobby killer Newt with spherical optics and pinched primary I started with
And I haven't even factored in the camera!
The sampling is better with a 533 assuming it's being paired with an Askar 71F
whats the pixel scale
no it isnt
undersampled
speciallly for good seeing
f/6.9 (nice) and you're comparing 3.76 μm pixels (533) to 2.9 μm pixels (585)
in good seeing
actually you're right. I'm shooting at f/8 and my stars are going to be more bloated due to seeing and the big CO on my scope
f/ratios are comparable but they're not everything
Yes
lowest bob supremacy
Depends what do you want to do
You can always binn if it comes to it
already said nebula
Yeah i saw that after
533, since you dont care about ir 
who cares about ir let’s be real here
yk half of my filters are ir filter right?
no


I do and also half of the most active members on this server do lol
IR FOR LIFE
The second SWIR cameras become cheap I'm gonna buy one
Because with NIR its like two in one you get light pollution reduction similar to that of narrowband with the broadband of well broadband
me.
it works great on obscured galaxies
i need one so bad
i love and hate that galaxy
What galaxy is that again
IC 342 (Caldwell 5)
the data isn't even that good due to bad flats
its the darn hidey galaxy
The only downside is you dont get a lot of that juicy structure
You mean from IR or just due to extinction?
From the ir
I'll see what I can do with this target once my flats are actually correcting properly
Like
Could be because its black and white
I'm only shooting IR data on this target, it's part of a collaboration with a refractor user
Who
Is it gonna be on astrobin
Someone who is not a member of this server
And yes very likely
How long have you spent on it so far
About 12 hours total, but most of the data is useless due to the flat undercorrection issue I've been experiencing.
Fingers crossed I've fixed it
What you're seeing is only 4 hours (1 per panel)
This is 12hrs?
Oh
I mean its not terrible for 4hrs
The flat undercorrection issue didn't show up when I shot it on a moonless night
Still more noisy than i expected
whaaa, can i see ur fov on it?
I forgot if I even denoised this data lol
Lol can't wait till i can get into IR imaging
denoise is overrated anyways 
do a 0.8x downsample if you want denoise!!!
I cant go to b4 for the entire winter due to a lack of winter tires and during summer i can go often anyway due to my parents having jobs and whatnot so that leaves only Saturday and Sundays which i can go all the time due to moon so yeah ir is pretty much a game changer at least till i can get my proper drivers license which should be around next summer
Then i can go and spend 2 nights in a row and pretty much every night
the only issue with ir is gradients in my experiance
i have been able to correct them thoes
I did a 2x downsample

I don't have it offhand but when I pull out my mini PC I can show you
oki :3
But it's about 40'x40'
I'm trying to match my friend's Askar 120 APO field, and he's operating at 840 mm focal length
so I'm doing a 2x2 mosaic
(he also has a 533)
what software do you use
11
21
2
Pixinsight
What do you think about the recent discovery of non-gravitational acceleration of 3I/Atlas?
11
19
1
Natural
1369024926605901834
gdinsane
Thanks em
Me
you might even say... hidden galaxies
Well... either if you bin or do a software bin later you will get the same results with a CMOS.
I'm sorry but why aren't you including the correct answer?
We were created in God's image 🗣️
Then why did he make me so choped
is astro still as fun as when you started
16
27
1
its more fun now
i was created in my image 
Yeah when you have a 1 arcsecond per pixel res you really won't notice it
We are all god's children and he left us in a hot car
With 2 arcsecond seeing
If I sell my 533mc pro and L-Enhance, what should I do?
10
14
2
Buy Touptek 585mm Bundle
why is bob so bob
11
18
3
bob
Some parts may look interesting, but others are just overdone or are super easy to overprocess 😩
there is no such thing as "the nebula in its entirety" unless you're making an actual survey
^proof
what we would consider the nebula to be in its entirety
there is no set of "guidelines" for it but you could also just argue what the object classification points too
The Milky Way is a nebula
technically NA nebula is just zoomed in cygnus complex
yeah that's what i'm saying. Either you're only doing a part of it, or you're doing the whole sky lol
core of lagoon is great
entire lagoon sucks
core of orion looks cool
entire orion is mid
thats the point im trynna make
cygnus wall is super cool, entire NA nebula not as much
"core of orion looks cool" 
yup
I did not realize there's a bigger Heart Nebula than the Heart Nebula
(it's the Orion-Eridanus Superbubble)
SO MUCH DUST
Hmmm… I think I may try it out with the sct
A couple pannels should do iy
you sure? 
I love how none of you have faith in me
(The 3 people who voted yes have never taken flats)
roki way less pain and less money
what in the roki rig makes it 800
roki=700-900$ bucks
oh is this ozzy money
what should a goober do
4
6
2
all out on 8" F/4 Carbon + Meyon CC + Gemini AF
nvm
Bro didn't like the democratic opinion 😭
there has been a change in plans
Where is the RC rig option 
Never.
But... but... M'agellanic clouds
🦀 FLAT ARTIFACT IS GONE 🦀
corcles
roki is a waste
stop spending lots on little stuff
you would love high focal length imaging (with a viable rig)
n
?
Elaborate?
really shouldve looked into thsi FBW thing before i got the camera
FBW?
Focus By Wire
ah
like its actually cucked me over so much
FBW is that Nikon thingy right?
i am the most brainrotted server member.
all lenses have it
Vote!
you need to slow down, set your sights on a rig, and get it. no more buying little stuff and upgrades and accessories that are expensive and have little upgradeability / room for progression. Save up, research, and get the big rig you deserve. You got a good camera coming, you are 1 step closer to the big rig, dont think of it as a mistake. Pleeeeaaasesese trust me.
lol my dad wants me to refund the camera bc my lens wont work with it
dont tempt me to bring back brown dwarf
its all over the place atm idk waht shappening
and ive got an exam tommorow arvo and here i am worried about my astro rig
yeah see i feel like so much of what you buy is 1 step forward 2 steps back. Dont refund it, keep chipping away at getting the rig you deserve.
focus on the exam
pls listen to this tho
yea but lik when ive spent $1.5k on a camera its on me that i shouldve done my research better and bc of this my parents cant trust me to get new gear
mistakes happen, oh well. It is your money, you are an adult. They need to be less helicopter parentish - no offence.
you worked hard for it.
money is for spending, youre young.
money is for spending on telescopes and girls
those arguments wont work on indian parents
not sitting in ur bank account deppreciating
trust me - ive tried
its not an argument, its what you should do.
The flat frame issue is fixed, at least in narrowband. Thanks @brisk copper, @summer turret, and @devout tinsel for having faith in me even when I didn't
Bruv, you voted NO as well
what is this hate on sam
I do 😁
You just gotta be optimistic
See i knew it
Exactly.
We do not know
So did you.
You can tell we are astrophotographers/astronomers because a normal human being would never vote new moon
moon ugly pos :3
If you don't believe in yourself nobody else would. Confidence is the foundation of motivation.
Oh I was 100% certain the adapter was the problem
context for those who missed: an adapter in my imaging train is reflective
Valid or Invalid? - Almost all Emission Nebulae look way better when shooting the core/a bright part or specific complex (like cygnus wall in the NA Nebula or Orion's Core) in the nebula than shots showing the nebula in its entirety.
6
13
2
Semi-Valid
Did I fix my flat frame issue?
12
16
2
No
866535292869804092
pepeMeltDown
if you voted no, screw you
Sadness
.
8
14
2
Is this a poll?
aaaaahahhaha
never interacted with
can you elaborate
greenie
lover
can you make the slander
@brisk copper
buh
Bobs cheating on you
nu :c
Yesums
What lore did I miss 
hey i never said that me and tea are doing anything smh 
you never said, tea however
wait where
#1411387988776058891 message
oh yea
:3
#💬-general-chat message'
#💬-general-chat message
uhhhhhh
:3
tut tut tut
:*
tieypo
:*
Processing software above the gear in this case💀
Im doing fine with Siril and SAS
I like SAS
Way better for mono
not that I do mono
Perfect Pallet picker is great
SAS doesn't like you tho
wow
siril is all loving
use the trial version and save up for now
sas 

does the beginner get prep time
depends if they are the topaz type of beginner or not
yall think a very new beginner in B1 with untracked phone can outperform a pro APer with the best equipment in B9?
no
no
no way
probably will survive but the data would be unusable
EQ6R, yes. GTi, no 
For a raw image i think the beginner would win but processed experience would match or maybe surpass
My rig weights as much as me 💀 unless it gets hit by debris then its fine
Me without counterweights 
What would you consider I like hot chocolate
6
15
5
Friend
Starts sweating at a gentle 1mph gust of wind😂
breathes on rig
rig goes flying
guidegraph:
^v^v^v
everyone that voted on beginner doesnt know who lucas goncalves is
untracked phone isnt too bad (these are mine)
Ypu mean like this?

gore
Imagine being there in person.
😰
Nightmare fuel. Palpitations, and frustration 😭
yea :(
My next Purchase?
6
14
do i photo the moon if it one day isnt cloudy?
9
14
5
yes
I assume they meant widefield, nothing but the phone
Still experience wins
Who creates the better image?
12
20
1
Very Experienced Astrophotographer untracked with phone
Do you think your rig can survive in 60km/h winds
11
21
2
No
Best Moon Phase!
17
26
1
New Moon
🌑
Ill try do this cheap diy project when i have the time to
Js need your guys opinions 
Yes but won't be accurate
a whole ass car engine? 😭
LS sway your telescope
Nah like the motors for the back wheels
And generic batteries for power supply
Its defo better focuser than shaky hands
here it is all 9 of u
Do you think attaching a remote control car motor to focuser will work as a Autofocuser (control by remote)
7
17
2
Maybe
Tastes like Limburger
only if you're not lactose intolerant
I assure you that I´m not
mind you i was using 600 gain before
420 (blaze it)
Unity gain
Which is 215 ish
Trust me anything higher than unity gain and you will lose snr rather than increase snr
what in concerned about is full well tbh
Yeah exactly
215 has higher full well with the least amount of noise
And higher DNR
210
reawwwyyy???
Maybe he didn't know idk
i didnt knwo ._.
Should I eat the moon
18
22
1
Yes
You post it in the same way you read it💀
YEAH YOU SAY BEFORE & AFTER BUT WHY DO PEOPLE STILL POST AFTER & BEFORE AND THEN WRITE AFTER & BEFORE
I can't be the only one bugged abt this 😭 😭
I look at their comparison and think "damn this mfer did not progress at all" and then read the caption 😭
IT STILL MAKES SENSE
IF YOU WRITE AFTER AND BEFORE THEN POST AND AFTER THEN BEFORE ITS JUST THE OPPOSITE WAY ROUND AND THEY ARE EVEN ADDING A KEY TO EXPLAIN THAT???????
-# its not like they writing b&a then posting a a&b ._.
BUT THAT'S JUST SO STUPID
WHY WOULD I GO OUT OF UR WAY TO MAKE THIS MORE COMPLICATED
LIKE BE NORMAL
THEY ARE MAKING IT LESS COMPLICATED BY ADDING A KEY TO EXPLAIN IT
WOULDN'T NEED A KEY IF U FOLLOWED THE "BEFORE & AFTER" TEMPLATE THAT EVERYONE IS FAMILIAR WITH
It’s like: before and after
after and before :3
Please see yourself out of this server
Processing monochrome lunar data is needlessly frustrating
who does mono lunar 
Me
I don't have an OSC camera
I just want to be able to register all of my lunar data at once and then stack each channel separately with the common registration
L
What gain should I use for my untracked M51 or M106 project (Uranus-C)
5
6
1
400
I’m surprised so many think processing nebula is hard
I find it much easier than galaxies, and especially lunar/planetary/comets
i mean - theres a ton of different nebulas
dark nebulae being hardest as they require more careful processing
I find IFN and whatever the hell Iris Nebula is to be the hardest
Iris was the hardest nebula I’ve ever processed. I had to give up lol
reflection/IFN
i find comets hard bc theres a lot more preprocessing steps for getting it stacked
Capturing Faint Ha nebula with Stock dslr broadband
If you like pain, you go for SII
Correct way to post a before & after comparison?
13
16
1
Before on the left, after on the right
Is that really hard or just annoying
It's like trying to read indoors with sunglasses
Stock dslrs have uv/ir cut filters in them which blocks most of the Ha light which is faint enough already
I’m aware
but enough integration will solve anything
not if its dim enough
itll still appear super dim in your stacks if its barely visible
Its pointless
option 4: 🧱
You gotta hold it really really carefully
option 5: elaborate setup involving various household objects that looks like it could fall apart at any time but is actually extremely stable
this is what i did except it was not stable
i tried it once and it was surprisingly stable (it collapsed the moment i walked away tho)
then it wasn't stable
if it lasted long enough for me to be able to use it then it was stable
it only collapsed once id taken my phone off it and started to head inside
now that i thinkk about it my phone probably was what was keeping it stable
if it collapsed it wasn't stable
it collapsed after i took my phone off it
so it was stable while my phone was on it
so it was stable
for a time
by that logic nothing is stable
because if everything is stable for a time then everything can collapse eventually
it lasted for one use
i could build it again
6 days?
all of the above, just depends on what deals they have
where mak cass
Where's the Mak?
Aperture wise probably SCTs but as soon as you consider the price then dobs win
you don't get them
Is there a 24" SCT?
isnt that observatory grade?
our local observatory uses a 16" SCT
When you go big enough, I'm pretty sure the dob also wins aperture wise, because then there's no need to use a barlow on the dob anyways
Or maybe there is idk, I'm just saying things lol
If you're imaging definitely, but for visual you can probably stick with a good eyepiece or 2
Dobs have the cheapest aperture to price ratio
yes
though theyre highly impractical for obvious reasons
where class cass?
one of the obs near me uses a celestro sct :(
that had a fat 24" newt before but they downgraded :(
mechanical pencil eraser my beloved
The glorious Ritchey–Chrétien is conspicuously absent, blasphemer
- you lack a lot of scopes
- you spelt "Schmidt Camera" wrong
- A dobsonian is a newtonian
How should I hold my phone for astro
8
11
1
Pencil I found in the school floor 3 months ago
wow
this means almost nothing when you assume same apeture and optical quality, as those are the 2 main ways to judge planetary preformance
poorly phrased, not the same optical quality but assuming that the optics are good
comparing a super-sharp newtonian to a meh SCT isnt fair
though i suppose i could redo the poll rq
where is cdk?
corrected dall-kirkhams are still dall-kirkhams
(dw browi pookie i made the free option just for you)
Are we talking planetary specifically?
but yea i wouldnt get an SCT for a heq5
sct isnt worth ut
planetary and visual
with the occasional long focal length imaging
oh yea go nuts with it
SCT isn't the worst...but the glorious Ritchey–Chrétien is superior
i found this beauty for 250
true
but 400 bucks more expensive
Wait that's a steal
Unless you want to do UV imaging I'd just take that and potentially a nice reducer
(SCTs can do IR really well if you adjust the backfocus, but they fall apart in the UV)
pretty dusty
You really are the only one saying this on the server 😭
nonono
they have a point
Did you forget about TMAs?
That's a them problem, not a me problem
Nah, but man I really do want one at some point
Best Type of Telescope for Planetary all around
15
24
3
Dobsonian
who doesnt want one
I swear on God I'll build one sooner or later
Peak bullshit 🔥 🔥 🔥
I'm fairly certain the HST is a RCT and the JWST is a TMA 
Of course, but fortunately I'm not in space and neither are you (I hope???)
Unfortunately I am not. Wdym fortunately??
oxygen
Tho maybe that's just a small price to pay for no atmosphere
Also calling jwst a three mirror anastigmat feels wrong
Oxygen is a poison, everyone I know that inhaled it has died 80 years or so later.
Both JWST and HST have more than 2 or 3 mirrors. 
The main optical train had three mirrors
There's probably a lot more for redirecting the image
Those are functionally one mirror though
Sure, still feels wrong tho
Wikipedia also doesn't call it a TMA, but a "Korsch telescope"
oh wait that's just a type of TMA lol
If Meade would still be in business, which would be better?
12
12
1
Meade
Well... HST is not an RCT, is a Cassegrain reflector 
Let's all agree, that it doesn't matter how many mirrors are there. Reflectors are always gonna be superior
*compared to pure fr*cs and/or in space
Catadioptric is pretty dang viable on earth because it allows you to get more aperture
Yah... fr**cs give me the ick
What Ducky said
RCTs are cassegrains
Cassegrain just means that the light from the secondary is reflected back at the primary afaik
Well... try to have this conversation in the #1326833769495269376 . I almost got crucified for asking what's the difference between classical cassegrain and RCT
not being catadioptric makes a larger appature most viable lol
cc is parabolic primary and rct is hyperbolic
RCT isn’t the worst…but the glorious Schmidt-Cassegrain is superior
You on something?
McDonald's vs Burger King ahh discussion
high
Average coma fan
Hardest form of AP - Vote Once Per Category
8
34
Which scope is best for planetary imaging overall? (but better)
5
12
1
Parabolic Newtonian
At which price point is an 8'' SCT worth it over an 8'' Newt (Assuming HEQ5 level mount -- barely can hold either)
5
8
8
Free
How's about a
HELL YEAH
idk tho. Sounds like a lot of additional expenses
I’d need an OAG, the focuser prob bad too
RC supremacy aside – used RCs are going to be a bit of an investment in terms of time and upgrades. (New ones less so)
yea so maybe I just wait
Get an RC8
A decent one
But I could Buy this RC6 rn
This one comes with a different focuser,
TS Optics 2-1/2" rack and pinion focuser
I’m not sure if that’d good or not
Actually this is very good
is it?
My friend at the local astronomy club uses one of these
@ornate glen would have more to say on RC8 vs RC6, but it's still a good proposition in terms of total light gathering (absolute aperture, not f/ratio)
Or drop by #1326833769495269376
rack and pinion is better than crayford
Is it possible to put an EAF on it?
@swift heart @zealous cloak
Yup
i dont see the issue
That was my main concern
the RAP is the golden one right?
RC users often upgrade to this particular focused
Yes
Unless im mistaken, that is a feathertouch
Probably
yeah haha
uhhhh please stop or else I’m going to be buying it
Thats a steal
no no isn’t this sus?
The RC6 is a good little scope
Why would it be?
Guy's had it listed for almost a month and got no bites
fair
Somebody is going to get robbed in this transaction and it's going to be the seller 
He just wants to offload it at this point.
The guy i bought my RC8 from had it listed for a year or something
He just about gave it away to me lol
How goods the combo of an RC6 and 533
People are hesitant to buy RCs because of collimation woes, but it's pretty simple if you just follow the DSI method (and we can help you)
Excellent
Very
DSI?
Am I going to need a Collimation device
There's a PDF about it
No, I have a whole copypasta about this
I watched a video about the “costs of an RC” and it was a guy who spent $600 on a laser
LMAOOOOOOOOO

It looked very fancy
Sucks for him
It's quite easy to collimate these
I walked @delicate rivet through it over text and he got it dialed in quite fast
Buying a 6" Ritchey Chretien telescope if fairly inexpensive considering other options. But . . . and this is a huge BUT . . . there are some hidden costs that new owners are often unaware of and can almost triple the cost of the telescope when you are done with your "upgrades" and must "haves!"
My Astrophotography Gear
Mount: Skywatcher EQ6-...
Around an hour or less
Oh yeah for sure was ez
I always stressed and never did it but it lowkey surprised me how easy it is
I heard the rc6 sucks tho cause the obstruction
Nah I rock with mine
The problem is that a laser makes assumptions about the position of the optical axis, and if it's wrong you'll never get the system collimated. A laser can work for getting it roughly in place if it's way off, but so can a Cheshire
I’m moving to the rc thread
It's definitely a bit of a downer imo but it isnt a deal breaker
was about to say
rc6 is good enough
The obstruction is about 50% on both
🗿
I’d have a problem with seeing with an rc8 probably. It’ll be a lot more money, and I like the fov I get with an rc6
reducer moment
Waaait. Isn't the secondary mirror on axis with the sensor? Which means there's a hole in the secondary... and because there's a hole, that means no reflective surface is being obstructed... sooo it's not 50%
what
#1326833769495269376 message
so what is the obstruction then
I don’t care for your math
no more fancy words
Bruv... that's the transmittance of the telescope. 78% so the obstruction is not 50% is 22%💀
And that's because of the baffles
Yes, you don't measure the amount of light that should go trough, you measure the amount of light that makes it trough.
so why are these nerds saying the rc6 sucks
Small aperture
It's slower than the RC8 as well😅
I use a f/7 scope rn. I’m used to it
Id Go for the 8" over the 6" any time tbh
I can’t afford it
It’ll be 3x as much
Approximately
Heard that the Focuser on the 6" is a Push and pull
Its Just a Tube U fix
So itll Slip over time
So U probably would have to Invest in a new Focuser anyway
Can u Show?
Its a rack and pinion. Hes set focuser wise.
Okok
here
Apparently the focuser is worth basically the asking price. So seems like a good deal
I can always sell the rc6 and buy an 8 if I feel like it
keep the focuser
Thats what I was gonna say, you can stay with that focuser for, I think, any scope you buy unless its a SCT
It is
I don’t like SCTs lol
I was looking to get one but theyre been unavailable for so Long xd
Keep putting in votes on what is toe best place to buy telescopes and their accessories.
Good
As a Former sct User,i Like the RC way more
Its been a pain to get collimated at First but its Worth the effort
nobody better snatch this from me
Is there anything I need to ask about though?
Is it going to be plug and play? (If Collimation is good)
Pretty much
U need to be aware that the Focuser itself can introduce tilt But i have Not Have any issues with Mine so far
Other than that
he included a gso tilt plate thing
For reference i took this one when i First got my rc
I cant remember If i messed w the collimation at this Point but i think i didnt
Do I buy?
10
12
1
Yes
I mean it depends if you perfect light weight and no need for counter weight then go for the ragdoll17
3 is good imo
fat scope for planets and visual, decent sized scope on a eq mount for small dsos, and a smol frac for big nebular
2 for dso 1 for solar 1 for planetary
Voted for the last one because it depends on whether you consider a quality finderscope to be a telescope on its own
idk if I'd call any target overrated but star clusters are massively underrated
if you think about it galaxies are just really big star clusters
M42 and M31 are very overrated. Also the most tortured 
The often overprocessed orion cores 😭 😭
orion cores are more processed than mcdonalds burgers 🥀
As someone who has the latter, I am yearning for mono and filters
And more aperture 🤤
If it was mono on frac on ragdoll 17 then maybe the 2nd option
callo is justifying the loss of any astrocam for a ragdoll 17 lol
Sure, a harmonic mount may look prettier but the results are not as good 😭
DSLRs should stay for beginners or low budgets
its about longetivy according to him
this is a great argument for the EQ5 lol
It’s cheaper to upgrade cameras than mounts
Since a full mono+filter set costs close to what the ragdoll 17 does, you can upgrade either one just as easy
920 USD vs 1380 USD (- the sold EQ5 + Onstep, which goes down to an equal or lower price)
My exact setup but with a mono camera? Hell yeah
Unless it's a mono 585, no
That’s my experience
guh
Nuclear bomb vs coughing baby
thats what im saying
I'm already rocking the first option
No they are just really big nebulas because star clusters don't contain gas and dust and don't actively form stars nebulas on the other hand always have star clusters within them and actively form stars
pleiades
star cluster
has gas and dust
Yeah but its not part of it its just moving thru it
Also thats only one
And not to mention its an open cluster globular clusters are more like galaxies as they contain a central black hole
so galaxies are just big globular clustets
I said similar i didn't say exact but there is one type of galaxy that is an exact match
Which is elliptical galaxies
i don't care ❤️
galaxies will always be big star clusters in my heart
Nah you gotta be accurate
Used Eq6r Pro or New Ragdoll 17 used with 8" f/4 Newtonian
8
11
2
Ragdoll 17
How many Scopes, It's too many scopes
17
20
8
there is no number which truly represents the amount
my hand

What would you rather have in a setup?
20
21
1
Full Mono, 130pds (coma corrected) on sufficient mount
The motors too weak if i actually screw thr focuser in it lacks power 
Was worth a try maybe ill do it with a bigger remote control car motor
What the hell is this
i can get mine within a few arcmin just by placing down my scope
i dont have a polarscope either
Wow. Fair
Toy remote control car i got the motor out then try attatch to focuser
I always am off by like 4 whole degrees everytime
buh
i still dont have one :3
Grr
im just not for that life yk
my hand
oh damn tea said the same exact thing as me lol
my hand is cooler tho
your hand is less presice
more*
you have an eq mount
ya
are you at f/4?
4.5
wha
750 + 0.9x reducer = f4.5
is the reducer also a coma corrector?
yas
hol up, lemme compare our fovs
not to diffrent tbh
yea lol
Mix of 2 and 5
I remember where it is with around a degree of accuracy
then i make it arcsecond accurate with nina pa
"Not too different" while one is almost 4 times the area of the other 😭
would a lobotomy help bob
14
14
1
yes
@mint talon
hehe bram empy
lobobtermy
lobomeowty
Use a NEMA stepper motor with a gear reduction
Like a belt
lobototea
What do you primary use to control your rig?
16
23
4
NINA
andromeda galaxy...
quasar
ima just get a photo of a static from TV
call it cosmic microwave background
Elaborate more? like by coincidence? or on purpose?
yes
10 Plus billion light years 3 people
It's very likely I imaged a random quasar and don't even know it
coincidence
How do you Polar Align?
14
21
2
N.I.N.A PA
How do you Polar Align (PT. 2)
2
4
3
I use Alt/AZ
Post this in cursed setups
Why even a remote control car bro get a stepper motor
They aren't that expensive you can grab one from ali for like 10 bucks
Same with like a stepper motor controller and an ardiuno then you can install one step and be able to control your focuser with micron level accuracy
Unless that scope is for visual in which case this is overkill
thats me!!
Dk how a stepper motor works but ill see
this gives me the idea to build my own focuser
You didn't know you could?
Anything is possible with a little bit of elbow grease
not really, I have a nema 17 and a 100:1 gear box, but that might be to large of a reduction
You dont even need a gear box
You can either do a direct shaft or you can use a belts and gears but with that ideally you shouldn't go more than a 10:1 gear ratio
The larger the gear ratio the more accurate your focuser will be but the slower it will turn and also you only need micron level accuracy which the 10:1 ratio provides perfectly you need a good balance between how fast the focuser spins and how accurate it is
how far is the farthest object you've ever imaged
7
18
9
10bly
most overrated target
9
21
2
orion nebula
🪖
sir you got a game to finish
If you had the capacity/interest I would be happy to share every single one of my datasets
name your game ashens dungeon
What is the best place to buy telescopes and their accessories
18
38
2
online
do people who have seen 4 just not exist or what
nope
damn
0
what lat r u ?
53°N😅
none
There were some down to even mexico last year
You need to consider that 90% of the year, is cloudy here
Same but i got a lucky break and managed to get this too bad there was a crap ton of light pollution would've loved to see it in b4
I feel bad for those guys who had fog in that image
Behind that tree in the middle
Gotta book night flights over the nordic countries >>
yea they’re on my telescope bru where else would they be
On my OTAs and eyepieces.
0, even tho im 54N I live in the uk so yea 
no dust caps
Only one and it was a banger
What is the hardest space object to capture even with advance telescope setups?
17
34
3
dark matter
Why is this poll shaped like the North Korean elections
Because theres only one good answer
wait...
o-o
do you actually know where your dust caps are
21
25
1
yes
How many aurora have you seen
8
21
1
1
😭
Why😭
it's right in front of like 3 nebulas
not enough!!!
it blocks out literally the coolest shite in the sky
you can diffraction spike from it when its no where near the frame lol
and when its in the frame you best believe that half your frame is covered by it and there are diffraction spikes edge to edge
It assassinates you if you dare to try to shoot any of the nebulae behind it with halos or insane flashbangs
You guys want me to suffer
I don’t even know if il be able to guide properly with the RC6
time to find out if u can or not
I don’t even know how to collimate the thing 💀
Time to learn :))
Here's why
It circled itself in case you haven't spotted it yet
Nah it's just going supernova
Idk pretty pretty if you ask me
Im going to image this star just to make the haters mad
mfer so bright i can read a book in its light
tries to take picture of c 2025 k1
alnitak diffraction spike snipes the comet
Altinak is truly evil
I could be looking at the moon and a stray spike just cuts it right in half
somehow
it's just that bright
LMAO
They are real spikes
Reflector spikes are caused by the secondary mirror obstruction.
If you do the same and obstruct a refractor, you get REAL spikes
why would you add spikes 😭
but refractors dont NEED spikes
adding unecessary spikes to fracs is like idk
feels too fake and glazy
if u want spikes get a refl*ctor 😭
I'm probably gonna deflock my spider to get the spikes I thought I paid for
This would make absolutely no sense out of context
you are a fraud
Alnitak

Censor again REFLECTORS and you are done.
Just crop out the name
check otu this clutster i imagined gyus
New Ragdoll 17 Pro + New RC6 + Clear Skies
11
15
2
Risky - Test new Mount with Untested New RC6
Should I make a website for my datasets
16
22
1
Yes I would use and engage with that
welp guess its time to start barking
slightly immature 
cant change it now :(
i do find it kinda funny how he acts more immature than the people he says are immature though 
What is the worst object in the night sky. And why is it the moon
9
15
2
It washes out everything cool
if its a good image then its fine, if its dogshit then its silly to sign the image
holy hate 🙏
we have to wait until he realises everyone is different and his way of expressing himself isnt the only one, give him time 
(and everyone else that voted to ban for that matter)
"are you boring" ahh poll
no aspirations mfs assemble
Diffraction Spikes on a Refractor through a mask.
12
39
5
Criminal
again, you are not cool or cute with the way you type in here, its just cringe. ashen is right, the thing is you are kids
aaand you have proven my point 
Whatever helps you sleep at night
insomnia :(
wheres option 0
also not real

hangs out in server of kids
doesnt like kids being kids
darn children childing like how children do
Specifically when their images look like the one you showed like bud aint nobody stealing that
its ir orion but continuum subtracted 
Yup looks lovely I'm gonna steal it
FLIP
dont you dare crop my name out!!!
Whoops my hand slipped
im making a 100 page google doc on you stealing my photos to call you out!!!
this image needs a watermark 
Nooo dont do it 🥺
i think the fact its in infrared and is cyan is a watermark in itself tbh
Is it ir or sum why does it look like a plum
its duochrome infrared yea 

its part of this full image
i printed off both versions tho
they arriving in 10 days 
wtf is this
some of your stars are lasers
best sticker
infrared bread
you can blame ashen for that 
he started it but if you continue its not his fault
i didnt plan on lol
people meowing in gen chat shouldn’t be defended 💀
ashen acts really imature about it
something tells me this is inaccurate
he has been whining about it for like 6 months 
thats quite childish
Yall acting like this is ur identity or something
Furry love :3
And dogpiling on me for it 💀
Im with you Ashen, you are right. The thing is mods dont care
I am the class clown don’t you know, a true hooligan
Yeah I don’t really think it should be modded as that is veering into 1984 territory but I do think it is weird and they should grow up
Agreed
or just drop the subject 🤷♀️

I'll switch to fish noises as a compromise
Thomas isn't here anymore. Free expression of opinions is valid
Within reason
@split tinsel deleted!!!
what did they do 🥀
@split tinsel always cheating in put party
when someone has signed their images you:
16
23
1
dont care
Skill issue on your behalf
should i do a 1 hour hand tracked photo
12
17
1
yea
i am not a kid despite the fact that i am very immature
Not enough watermark
look at my new pic
is ashen crashing out over people being "immature" highly immature
10
17
1
yes
It's funny because it doesn't really matter if you are a couple of kms away from this thing, the result is the same 
frick u
would you rathet have people in general
8
9
1
meowing
it's my photo
bob
Guys you're forgetting to overprocess it with weird colours and unrealistic artifacts and overly AI denoise
Ok, the jokes been done, we can calm it down now

