Google Docs
#The blurx-request-thread
1 messages · Page 4 of 1
You are so goated, thank u so much
this image is really old but its super out of collimation and i wanna see what blurx can do
wait am i supposed to bg extract and color calibrate first
It's fine as it is
I run bx before any of that
oh wow it worked very well
ty for that
it bent the spikes of edge stars really weirdly
but it looks way better than the insane coma

BlurX please
I need some tiny stars
Bodes and cigars properly Xterminated, Sir
Maybe too tiny
Thats fine
If someone bxs this I'm going to give them a smooch, if they want, otherwise I just say thanks or something, idk, thanks
hello someone blurx pwease thank you
@formal phoenix @wispy wagon didn't go hard on either one
your data looks pretty good in general
(not my data to clarify)
mm can you go a little harder with blurx on mine
ye
thanks bossman
I'll go default on yours and you tell me if that's too much
ya bet
if I go much higher than this I'll be hitting the bx limit 
Thank you!
lmk if you want stronger settings too
I'll start a text doc with all the settings you prefer
perfection
NEED BLURX ASAP PLSSS https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iR5Z7iOwpNe7DmpbgNRDls28jqh-8gfl/view?usp=sharing
tried some old school lucky imaging
can someone please blurx this? already processed data
ANYONE
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1i8yUXNesNGxkb4emDlL_u505EITRCCFi/view?usp=sharing Can someone please blurX this
Google Docs
Did ya all go sleepin‘ or what? 
It's Saturday, I'm not home and I assume the same for the others
@pliant valley Can I be really annoying and ask you to blurx these files in a particular way?
, apparently it helps. Run it in correct-only mode first and after that in the default mode. (if you got home in the mean time, that is). Thank you pook 
yup
send me
Yeah my internet is doing it's best give it a sec lol
So correct only first, and then re run in the default settings ya?
Yep
THANK YOU BRO
Looks fine, thank you
thanks :D
Here @pliant valley
that's a starX moment
Lmao
StarX is confused that such a perfect sphere is actually a nebula 
BlurX please, but please not too aggressive on the stars @pliant valley : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lACphVwMY6ApwNxemStwG0jfeEQz5Hrg/view?usp=sharing
Google Docs
I ran it at 0.25 instead of the default 0.5, let me know if that's good
Its perfect, thank you :)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JJ5pXEHDtJD38cxJf69cVfaMSi95nH4l/view?usp=sharing. Can you do it here again? :>
Google Docs
More on the neb now please
thankyou!
umm why did the noise get deconvolved too?
It didnt. The first one is just denoised
it 100% did
that is not detail
thats deconvolved noise
noise shouldnt look like that
Its not… It probably comes from cosmic clarity superres. The small noise spotches get bigger too. Thats probably why it looks so unnatural. But it is only noise, it didnt get deconvolved. I know what I did in my process and I can tell, its noise thats didnt get deconvolved
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ejkbq0Pd8JgbTFPxlRYc5qIv_LbJgCrQ/view?usp=drivesdk id like this blurxed (and noisexed if possible) please
Google Docs
Cosmic clarity sharpening? Which is deconvolution? That’s absolutely Decon noise, no doubt about it or mistaking it
No, not the sharpening. Superresolution
The noise splotches got bigger. It's not caused by deconvolution
Right so you upsampled lol
Yea
But not deconv
I have to experiment around a bit. When I upscale it the splotches get bigger and Graxpert denoise recognizes them splotches as stars
Id highly recommend just not upscaling on a general, stacking with 2x drizzling is much better and wont cause artifacts or kill details+noise
I just wanted to try it out. And it was to little data to drizzle

can someone blurx this, sadly collimation was completely fucked
Love u 
Hello can someone please delete with blurx drifting stars. Thanks. And in Sll please gradient.
Please someone
Hi guys can u please try to edit this i dont know what should i do to have less noise. THANKS https://drive.google.com/file/d/19BGHPKNjgpOQ5TtsgCHh42weuSDIcuzS/view?usp=drivesdk
Google Docs
Try #1021002743080558642 if you want more than just blurx
Blurx would be enough
I'd appreciate some bx, not too aggressive. There is some walking noise, I was unguided at the time, so I'm not sure what BX is going to do with it, if there's a way to run it on stellar-only that would probably help it
Even better would be to run it in correct-only and then run it again in default-mode. I've heard that helps a bit too
before and after correct only
ofc, thats how I always do it
Im more curious to what the non stellar does on this
It already did a lot lol, try running stellar with a small strength ig
Yeah that would be interesting to see lol
it "sharpened" some starlight that wasn't seperated
Looks pretty similar tbh
here is with the other stellar sharpening
I wonder why
What's up with the line in the middle?
uh
It's in the un sharpened one too actually
Yeah, let me take a ss wait
I see what you mean, im trying to figure out if apple does that or pixisight
or discord
Maybe the non-stellar? The correct-only looks fine to me
Uh no it had it either way mb
It was there after correct only it seems
Not here tho
Weird, try sending the .xisf after correct only
There's a vertical one too btw
It's dividing the images in 4 regions lol
sorry, forgot to click enter
Thanks

Thank you very much
Why did you ignore me😭
Thx
Can someone try this guys
This is the bx thread, not the share your data or processing general one 🥲
oh sry i dont get that mb
i will send an m51 here once i put it on my pc and restack it
😼
sry apparently i stacked wrong so im gonna have to resend it when its done stacking
Spujds good, I'm about to go to sleep tjoifj so I'll run it again tomorrow
I could tell you're about to sleep
Google Docs
Google Docs
can anybody please do blurx and mgc using mars database if possible🙏🙏
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YQwCmbbfZaG6tBoTF-PlQwVQZQkIWH6X/view?usp=drive_link can anyone use blurx on this?
Google Docs
Bxt, nxt and narrowband normalisation please 🙏
Narrowband normalisation for such an Oiii inside like this please
i got you
all i could do
Tif file please🙏
ok
@brave solar sorry for second request🙏
all good let me do it real quick
anyone pls
got you

@lean cosmos
just bxt?

if u can do the others that would be great
let me do some basic fixing up on it
ok i did some editing but not all of it here you gohttps://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1UvxbplHl2AhbHWkCpjUQEHbkVRSYBxXj?usp=sharing
do you have uncropped
or did you need that for it to work good
this is just bxt and nxt?
yep. i do have uncropped but man it has a bad gradient even with graxpert
yea i use a heritage so light leaks are guaranteed
do you want the uncropped?
it looks stretched tho is that just because of nxt?
yea i managed to get rid of the gradients kinda
no i had to for noiseX. auto strech made it look horrible
ok
added to folder
sry for asking so much but do you have the just bxt image
uh oh i just deleted it im sorry
let me just bxt it agian
and sorry for doing more than asked haha
its uploading
just bxt
can anyone pleas blurx dis
THE FOCUS HAS DARED TO CHANGE MID SESSION, NOW THE DATA MUST EXPERIENCE THE WRATH OF BLURX
sorry this is the right one
Plz🙏🏻🙏🏻
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1x6BEy9JtNDCyek_ITKa3tPp24n2UK9GL/view?usp=sharing I desperately need blurx
Google Docs
anyone who can blurx this please do
Never mind someone else blurxed this
Can i still see the results
Hello can someone blurx on stars because of drifting please
BlurX really wanted to make your stars doubled or tripled, but here it is anyway, ran NoiseX at 60% to clean up some of the nebulosity
No noisex needed on this, there's not much noise, but next steps are definitely MGC or DBE, or some kind of gradient removal, after a quick crop
Yeah, I tried messing with the blurx settings but no dice. Honestly could be worth trying lens distortion correction in photoshop
ok but thanks for trying
not a problemo
ok wait
i will try give you fit
maybe its tiff problem?
@tame orbit try this maybe its tiff problem
ill try 1 sec
ok
I don't think filetype would make a difference, though, if there's distortion, the filetype wouldn't change that. You'd have to figure out the distortion some other way
ok
What kind of corrector do you use? Was it from your dob?
ok i did 20 seconds exposures i though someone can do blurx and delete drifting
but i was wrong
It can do it within reason but it was quite a bit of field distortion at the edges
It made me wonder what your corrector and backspacing is
The Fits file did work a little better, but didn't fix everything
Bxt on low ran (stars had some CA at default), then SPFC, MGC, SPCC and light noisex https://gofile.io/d/gQafVR
Just ran BXT on this, let me know if you need more. Data looks great, by the way, good job https://gofile.io/d/rs08pm
Thank you man you’re a real one🤝
THAAAANNKKK YOOUUUUUUU
NP
No problemo

Soon, haven’t processed yet
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1N3yzeaXFXhOjDpR1Fj4qD2NlIczmKKQs?usp=sharing a BLURX would be mercyfull
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aie_Gw266IA5sSBS4L-jkeVSOKREOqk0/view?usp=sharing
BlurX and DeepSNR pls
Google Docs
https://we.tl/t-ncAlBNdZOx guys can you apply noisex and blurx
1 file sent via WeTransfer, the simplest way to send your files around the world
Its a realy good data
I'll do the blurx reqs in this channel late tonight if no one has yet
https://gofile.io/d/6sjlgJ here you go, i have NO IDEA what it did in the bottom right, but it'll be cropped anyways
imaging trifid rn but it looks like its gonna need heavy blurx (a bit uncollimated)
https://gofile.io/d/HIIUJM bxt and deepsnr done
so expect trifid here soon
appreciated
It's wonderful data btw!
out of focus 
yea it’s the 71f.
My focus was slightly off, should be sharper
BlurX definitely will help
It’s better when you don’t zoom in
mmm compression
just broke my blurxterminator installing deepsnr LOL
i gotta remove it lsdkjghnsdfkjsgfh
Cosmic Clarity vs BlurX vs Raw
cosmic clarity isnt good
im in siril idk how to check that
an actual good free blurx alternative is graxpert deconv
no
grax deconvo is terrible
the denoise is a bit better than CC but the sharpening is terrible
its 32 bit
https://gofile.io/d/4pYpc7 blurx and noisex ran
Thanks
Google Docs
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ir25eBWuNcPte-6zTnQ0KxOcqUDL7x6o/view?usp=sharing this took an hour to stack 😭
Google Docs
don't blurx this one i added more data so i need to restack
I think im overworked, cant process the data the same anymore
Google Docs
🎣
Google Docs
why drive
its only 60mb u could send it directly
Hi guys would you mind to making me a noiseX to my M16 image. Thanks. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1imkJSQLFEDeNYdoRh0jTIH_yE1dhmwA-?usp=sharing
They took a loooooong summer vacation
😦
Yeah im waiting on my M16 data but ig they enjoying the summer days with a mojito in their hands
Im happy that they are willing to do this for plebs like us. Let them enjoy their mojitos
cc better than grax
Could you resend this but in the raw format? running noiseX on a png can introduce unwanted effects
maybe its just my data but when i tried grax was better
grax is give or take for me
different for everyone!
but now i have blurx and deepsnr so shrug dont care
which is the andromeda?
here
@opal bluff
holy crap
damn, 6 spikes
yues, 3 vane newt
wha, how u get???
3 vanes make 6 dim spikes
@terse zinc

wait sry for asking but can you run deepsnr too @pliant valley , mine removed itself
idk why, i tried installing the cuda stuff and it didnt like that i guess
ye
yeah no the tensorflow stuff from deepsnr and starnet are horrible and break shit
i had to reinstall everything for the tensorcoreflow stuff to start working again
yea it took my starnet along with it
installed the blurx one, skipped starnet and deepsnr's
they work good with the blurx one
ill run it at 0.5, tell me if that's too much
can u tell me how to reinstall everything and fix it
@terse zinc eatid ur gradient btw
this was my final process of it
yummi lookin!
you can eet
i will >:3
just dont eat my dumbbell
yesyesyesy
@terse zinc 0.75 this time
perfect
yknow what, this wouldn't be too bad
i hope grax will remove that nasty eagle gradient lmao
rotate 90, can you get omega in there too
oh true
learn how to use the mars database in pix to get rid of gradiants
it fixed my andromeda that had massive lp gradiants
i barely know how to use it either don't worry
An introduction to the MultiscaleGradientCorrection tool in PixInsight (part 1)
00:30 Loading MARS databases
01:51 Flux calibration
04:20 Reference image generation (I)
05:09 Gradient model
05:40 Reference image generation (II)
06:51 Background neutralization after MGC
oh mgc
i love that so much tho
eat it
are you deleting the galaxy with background extraction 😭
yummy :3
i see the core
lemme sharpen the stars
you left a lil bit
flip
cmon you need to learn how to eat the black hole
ill denoise it for u too!
just eat the noise
thats too easy
new and improved!
True
What about my M16 data😭
Google Docs
oh damn that's a big tif
I'm enjoying mojitos
yeah thats why i tried to send you a reduced version its shoot with canon R50 so.....
That's fine, processing data in png or jpg shouldn't be done
Even if the file is 1gb, it is what it is
Thanks
yep
uploading
Google Docs
I ran blurx to fix up the stars and halos a wee bit, ran a bit of denoise as well but I'm not sure why, the denoiser didn't do too much
gonna take a look
if I ran bx even slightly high, m16 became very frickly and noisy
did you take calibration frames?
hmmm might be stacking artefacts, let me see if i can correct it
For some reason I can't plate solve this
Doesn't matter what I try, it just refuses
yeah doing blurx beyond correct only still nukes the data
can't figure out why
idk mine data everytime has some problem
While processing others data😭🙏 well thank you
Yeah they didn't complain
w
calm down
no one should be forced to blurX your or anyones data so chill out
Im not complaining or forcing anyone
you definitely did complain a bit
A bit yeah but i did not make a drama, imma just let it happen ig
My lens kinda shitty so I need these 5 blurxed. Doesn't need to be tooo hard. I just want the stars to be "in shape" muhaha https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Mitn8SaKF_0xFkxWr15-GWK2U7q6sLJl?usp=sharing
amma make your stars less in shape, muehehehehe >:3
naur
awh, okie :<
do u have blurx tho? xD
sadly not
Ping me in a few hours if I forget
alr got it but thank you
hello, some blurxing action on these files would be much appreciated:
2 files sent via WeTransfer, the simplest way to send your files around the world
Does this guiding deserve a blurx of my M16 data with my wobbly eqm35
how tf
wobbly thats the right word
Perfect seeing
Im being fr, the backlash is too much for me but here i am with my 0.37 guiding
Google Docs
Tyyyyyy
is it only one file?
@pliant valley
1 file sent via WeTransfer, the simplest way to send your files around the world
guys can you apple noisex and blurx pls thank you
🍎
if u already used graxper denoiose it bad idea
no idont
dats goob then
@pliant valley Can I bother you?
sure
one of those has a starlink trail, did you only do 1 sub
I know, it's just test data so it's fine
It's 5 subs per channel so rejection didn't work :(
anyone got bX
guys
im sure someone will have bx in the bx request channel
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u88xIW9dGAXajRl2szh8dhXCo2jeMhI3/view?usp=sharing
can someone bx this? If you also have starx I would appreciate it if you could also do that
Google Docs
thankyou
SAVE THE DATA PLSSSS PLSSS PLSSSS i lost collimation mid session and bcs of that my G and B channels are bad pls fix it pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls
I did too much didnt i
Hi guys i have some NGC 247 data that needs blurx or noisex can u please try that. Thanks
At this point im being desperate
you have to give me access to the file
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GOl1MlD9XebGX5Xc1wYkiMncOsczaSKJ/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WuTvSpBFBoObsa-_ythKLzY8ueX_zi5K/view?usp=sharing
Google Docs
Google Docs
Sorry it should be alright now
@pliant valley Are you available to run bx? Disclaimer: the mosaic is a pretty big file
gib
?
Ye it's uploading, I'll use SendAnywhere
sounds good
if my ryzen 7 5700x3d, 3080 and 32gb of ram can't handle it, then we have a problem 
i couldnt use blurx, i did it twice but it applied lots of hot pixels on your image, so i only ran noisex eventually https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OxUZlylu_A_9hetdlM0uJcE8gfK-NXf6/view?usp=sharing
Google Docs
If you can a bit morea aggressive than usual
And correct-only first 
Oh that's only 264mb
Yeah I reduced the bits
After someone's 1gb per raw stack, I was scared you'd send me a 3gb file 
(the 1gb per stack data was fake anyway)
@formal phoenix
correct only -> 0.3, lmk if it's too strong
Thank you, looks good to me
@pliant valley
can you apply my data too
yeah
oh thansk
I have this chat muted, so in the future if you want something bx'd relatively fast feel free to ping me
got it
Did you dither? if so how often?
Yes i did but the sensor was at 40 degrees.
You got a lot of walking noise, not sure what gear you have but dithering every 2-3 minutes is ideal - obviously if your subs are longer then you just dither ever sub
I applied dithering every 3 frames
how long was each sub
the denoiser didn't do much, which is why I'm asking
Uploading
1 file sent via WeTransfer, the simplest way to send your files around the world
thank you so much
NoiseX please🙏
Please🙏
Thanks a lot
Thx but what about Ha and red
oh i only saw B and G in your message
There are 4 attachments to it
someone PLEASE blurx this I need it so bad ASAP it will save my life
https://we.tl/t-3FUNM3yY6b
bortle 2 data andromeda 150pds PLEASE
1 file sent via WeTransfer, the simplest way to send your files around the world
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1j4nnouEJn063voq9dCGq_XrCmwPgHQF9/view?usp=sharing
BlurX and DeepSNR plss
Google Docs
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19KRgQMKefwVH2Sxwp3D5xloh64HZRSaN/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sVM-bXLzzZHg1CUyc2-wCvXjWC93lfFf/view?usp=sharing
Google Docs
Google Docs
i'll have time tonight
i'll also do it tonight
Thank you
I am @sleek depot i am just a alt
Take ur time
Google Docs
Google Docs
thanks!!!
@pliant valley same shenanigan of correct first and then bx if possible. The last file is the Sii that I already had someone BX; if you can try to use settings that make it slightly sharper than the example. I feel like it can be sharpened more without over doing it
I think I got it slightly sharper, thoughts?
Tried some aggressive settings
Not too aggressive though
I'd go a tad more aggressive, like .05 more
Good, cause the seeing that night was beyond dog shit 
Thank you very much
any time
man i have so much stuff i want to send here but i dont want to give people a trillion things to blurx
i kinda already am doing that tho 😭
this three 
@terse zinc
😼
@echo eagle
@pliant valley I need your blurX skills on my M31 again pls :)) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eazNuiRq81YU6HLwH9px-l46WK1pkhBJ/view?usp=sharing
Thank you :D
JJ to Sam's job dayum
@echo eagle
@echo eagle
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VMFLBpSERQBScxNVpr67PS1q7wS0cSi9/view?usp=sharing Can someone do some bx correct only and then full bx on this please
Thank you
@pliant valley hi do you have starx
yeah
all right are you busy now
all right thanks wait a min
all good
damn that's a nice image
https://we.tl/t-EvAyeis92d @crude cape
1 file sent via WeTransfer, the simplest way to send your files around the world
If someone has the time please
@pliant valley I need your blurX again 😭 . This time something BlurX will love. 2xdrizzle https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WdDuYWEkcTK2a6Te3nI3JPK7OMdCVhlk/view?usp=sharing
Google Docs
Id really appreciate it :)
yeah will do yours too
I'll do this in a bit, I'm working and my gpu is needed for work lol
pix already crashed twice because blurx is just trying to use my entire pc
All good. Never expected to see my question so quickly answered anyways
1 file sent via WeTransfer, the simplest way to send your files around the world

1 file sent via WeTransfer, the simplest way to send your files around the world
are you undersampled or oversampled?
drizzling 2x when oversampled can lead to things looking slightly goofy
mhm
2xdrizzle with 0.8 dropshrink just halfs the pixel size?
Wit "ok seeing" I am with and without drizzling in the range of ok-good combination
with 2.4mu and 1.2mu if the size gets halfed
yeah, but if you're oversampled (i.e shooting at 0.5"/px when your limit is 1"/px") it can cause things to get smooth when 2x drizzled because you're already shooting above your aperture's limit
@sonic plume what's your fl, aperture and camera?
250mm (redcat51) paired up with the zwo 183mc pro (2.4mu)
yeah you're already oversampled
you have a resolution of 1.98" but your limit is 2.27
drizzilng gets you a resolution of 0.99" while the limit is still 2.27"
that'll cause things to look smooth
hups
would you then be willing to again blurX this for me https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qUa14mwqYSnFkq3PV4i4nweOPreLxtWg/view?usp=sharing (1xdrizzle) 
Google Docs
ye
idk what 1x drizzling does but i'll do it regardless
for clarity i don't drizzle my stuff either, i used to but it had no benefit and it just gave me artefacts when denoising, deconvolution etc
i'm oversampled too
Its now normal in Siril. I dont know how to disable it. And the preprocessing script I normaly use didnt work (idk why) so I had to do everything manually
Thankyou :D
1x drizzle is beneficial for OSC due to balancing colours better
Basically useless for mono so rip me
Huh. You are nerd now :D
:c
yeah :D
Yo guys. Can anybody do bxt and nxt
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ubeRdpWp-H682zcOQV1lfwcv9qETF00c/view?usp=sharing
Google Docs
Yo @pliant valley can I bother you?
yeah, bx'ing them
these look noisier than your usual images, did you add fake noise to them?
They don't look that different to me, I definitely didn't add noise lol
They are shorter subs because I didn't tune the mount yet
So that could be it
You can see some general trailing in fact
But seeing was better fortunately
I think the Oiii is 2.8" which here is definitely above average lol
@formal phoenix
Thank you
noiseX's colour option is crazy
I should try it on my data
big thx
NoiseX please🙏
Hi. Need bxt n nxt for these images.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1SBFRh4yCiO9V04z40jCHKGJdqr3ZV5eb?usp=sharing
Would really appreciate some blurx on this. If you do, pls leave the stars mostly alone, Like almost lowest it can do. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Tu3hxlhASCGqWIuoXlHIcxNNx5BO3cRf/view?usp=sharing
Could someone bxt and nxt this please? I really want to see how powerful it is. This data has a 2x drizzle applied.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/12EgqwgGS7Fod69XNBl5k-1MkdBqwDIzG/view?usp=sharing
Is someone of the BlurX'er willing to show me the different individual settings of blurX since I have to give the values for masterprocesser comp?
like this?
I guess. Wait, can you draw the adjust halos slider into the negative??
Just bigger halo then?
negative would be smaller halo
Ok, makes no sense but ok xD
why not? positive values increase and negative values decrease
opposite way would be even weirder
Yeah ok. I took the sharpening menue as reference. Positive means sharper and thus smaller
as in sharpen stars but not nonstellar?
idk why you would want that, but yes
just drag nonstellar all the way to 0.00
blurx should always be done on linear images
But it can be applied on stretched?
Problem is that I have already processed the image and I dont think and also dont have the time to reprocess everything to achieve the same result
nothing is stopping you, but it really shouldn't
I know :(
true deconvolution is only possible on a linear image
so if you use it on a non linear image, you could just as well use regular sharpening methods
Ok. Thank you
Would you be willing to blurX a picture for me? ((:
Google Docs
nonstellar at 0.00, sharpen stars at 0.5 and adjust halos -0.2
Google Docs
hello friend
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rnqaDLfp05izcVMrb5_82RlYQOQHYEFV/view?usp=sharing
stars 0.15 and other 0.35-0.4 is possible :D
Google Docs
Google Docs
Thank you kindly
https://drive.google.com/file/d/12EgqwgGS7Fod69XNBl5k-1MkdBqwDIzG/view?usp=sharing
some unfortunate coma
Google Docs
3.6k messages go crazy
thank you mate
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wqIW1sHgcv2eNC3-KLIfCzATGwKSl74A/view?usp=sharing would need a blurx rq
Google Docs
why is the name "ttttt"? lol
lol me do this tooo
i ran default blurx. im new to it myself so if you know any settings i can change let me know
ill turn up the sharpen stars and see what happens
hmmm its not making the bigger stars round
it makes some smaller but the larger ones seem dificult to fix
@tepid pecan would u mind doing a quick blurx on mine too?
.
I wonder how much bx can do to this
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ysaxtHTV-avNeFSqxrVsSc4x-GH2Yelp/view?usp=sharing
Google Docs
don't over bx it though
Will have to do this later, my pc's already being pushed and I can't stop it right now
alrr no problem
you have blurx ? i was gonna do dobs but its green and idk if i should color calibrate it
or just run blurx
im figuring out how to color calibrate 
you can bx and color calibrate after :p
I just run it correct only first, then a 0.2-0.6 pass depending on the data
Tyty!!
i couldnt figure out the background or color calibration but ill figure it out
i hope this is good
love❤️
the image was alrady bright so i guess it wasnt in linear but idk if blurx works best in linear
hm yeah I did dbe and spcc
but bg neut probably made it bright
stars look fab! gna start processing then ill be able to see if the rest of the image is also crisp! Thank you!!!!
hey yo when did you get magnetar?
Sometime last week, I forgot when 😅
yeah starnett isnt gonna remove those stars
I just need a star correction on them so like 0.10 or 0.20 will be enough. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1LsY9KBsnBizdZP3NUhvkr5TQPdRY_EU8?usp=sharing
Tysm
hope this is good
yea thats perfect! Thank you
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/10Z_3Tk2DOf340M9f1YSAe92dBiW6grpq Had two clear nights in a row :D Can someone please use blurx on this?
THANK YOU SO MUCHH 
im learning Pix so i tried my best for the color correction and gradient correction. tell me if you see some something strange tho
Its looking good so far, I wish I had to money rn to get pix
blurx it till it looks acceptable please 
define acceptable 
being able to look at it
then it should be better now, though it would work better if it was higher res
It was from a cheap-phone grade camera
blurx isnt magic it cant really handle the shenanigans going on in the edges
oh he did it i didnt notice
@pliant valley got any time for some bxing?
yeah
Give me a moment as it's the mosaic lol
M33 right? I want to try doing SHO on the core of it
@pliant valley here http://sendanywhe.re/FUCJURL6
Oh btw
I'm pretty sure you also bxed the Ha
I have no idea what settings you used but if you remember then try to use something similar
yeah i 100% did between 0.3 and 0.4
so i'll be doing that
@formal phoenix
check if this looks fine
Considering my internet you'll get an answer in 4 to 7 years 
😭
Ok no idea how but it did it very quickly this time
@pliant valley yep it's looking good
mega
no stellar
correct only and then some non stellar
if you cant then just non stellar pls
ok, do u know what settings u want
.4 non stellar but if it cooks do like .3
i dont think itll cook
but still
shit that was faast
got a good pc
interesting
hi can somebody do bxt n nxt pls
tysm
BlurX would be appreciated
dman that was fast thanks
tyty
forgot to rename it but lol
you always do its all good lol ill fix it
blurx would be much appreciated :)
Blurx would be appreciated
the nebula has this weird black ring around it from blurx so ill post a correct only version in a sec
Thanks
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FyPIqGgHIzdjrjC1T8PcBwd3svhoROzp/view?usp=drive_link
please blurX, and DeepSNR or NoiseX
Google Docs
Google Docs
Thanks
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eGk12wfJkTfNDNeEs7tb8rltg-Rjd8KU/view?usp=sharing
blurx n noisex pls
Google Docs
Google Docs
@pliant valley can I bother you?
Thank you very much 
Blurx would be appreciated
Google Docs
Google Docs
Hello, guys! Here's a nice stack of cepheus constellation widefield, could anyone run bxt (nxt and sxt if possible as sepate files) pls? https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1brcAno-7FJSxkNFasU2_E5g8_EjmsYsx?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/10Z_3Tk2DOf340M9f1YSAe92dBiW6grpq?usp=drive_link Helo
Can someone please use blurx on this?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Tu3hxlhASCGqWIuoXlHIcxNNx5BO3cRf/view?usp=sharing 0.15 stars (basically only correct them not make em look like pixels) and 0.3 nebulaa
ty!
May I have BlurX applied on this please? If possible I'd need StarX later too if I send the denoised image.
https://mega.nz/file/2yhCjR7R#naLKt_3hH2_B_GI_EkB4I-AF3bnWX-XEcW7mm_G5QGw
I went ahead and applied nxt and starx to the image
Starless: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_zUMLb7wz0yStMQ0cmMWWam8-lqt17Av/view?usp=drive_link
Stars: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zFcp5tH0d8oSvC2eW4ITBM5NS3Qp9oK3/view?usp=drive_link
Google Docs
Great thanks, I think I'm going to use these but to check can you also send me the BXT only file please?
sure
Stars .50, nonstellar .85
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qWtPFexYjzPUy-QV9-z0G2nAQFMFEfg1/view?usp=drive_link
Google Docs
sorry for causing you trouble, could you settle for like .5 non-stellar and .20 stellar? I can see oversharpening artifacts. If you want I can do the denoising myself using GraXpert to then send for StarX but I really appreciate you for having thought about NXT too
Google Docs
ok thanks this is good now, tomorrow I'll try to denoise and send it for StarX
https://mega.nz/file/uipSkL5J#-RzIa3IFRj_aeLqjSkvc6amdjpCIS8UKkgSARHfIbKk
Denoised using Graxpert. Needs StarX
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17TsGruswD314FCrbiFZ_1OBhhNSztAzN/view?usp=sharing
need blurx(0.25 stellar n 0.4 non-stellar) n noisex(0.65) pls
Google Docs
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XDJvEysEv6QzNcCjfnD9edRMzu1oTMO2/view?usp=drive_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rkXehXted0M20V2YrZrFZBpehWJt_EVi/view?usp=drive_link
Google Docs
Google Docs
thanks a lot
Google Docs
@pliant valley http://sendanywhe.re/XW2PGRBZ here it is
Took longer than I thought 
Need a few mins lol I'll ping you when it's done
@formal phoenix thoughts ?
Sorry I was having dinner, I'll check it out in a moment
@pliant valley damn it's so much cleaner compared to dsnr
Thank you

literally middle of the road on every denoise setting, glad it worked out first try
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1c_CmxsxM-AS3Asohoy4xq9YvsCH03kqx/view?usp=sharing 0.15 stars (basically only correct them not make em look like pixels) and 0.3 nebulaa pls and thank you :D
Google Docs
Google Docs
Thank you Sam!
blurx(0.4 stellar, 0.6 non-stellar) n noisex(0.75) please
@pliant valley I'd appreciate some BX (this is not my data). Fwhm is quite high but the data doesn't look too bad, I'd go relatively soft with 0.35 non stellar
bet
My good man
A blurx for this please:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tdHYChjGTO2O48fVSRFOuyapNdoYfypd/view?usp=sharing
Google Docs
hi, can someone blurx this? thx
Blurx would be appreciated
can someone do bxt n nxt pls🙏
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1IInCDCKIz7cwenZcWB7dTonR_8AWZbxP?usp=sharing
If possible I'd need BlurX (stellar only: 0.20), then to run StarX, real thanks
https://mega.nz/file/fi4DUR4T#BEzhtmDq-yXmF0s6KlOqAyOd46_pXx4Dd36mQnZw_tA
Stars: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1D6HxSq3BfFnthGwNHZNUb0E6eGLSSYYl/view?usp=drive_link
Starless: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yaChUEK1KkAh6yNd61239NNj8o1Krpbh/view?usp=drive_link
Google Docs
Google Docs
Could I get blurx, starx, noisex run on this thanks. Starnet is not cutting it with such vast saturations of stars. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1sdroec9OeUWrqY9qcDTAVuc_7ahNvio3?usp=sharing
Can someone blurx this, high on stellar, like .5, and .1 on non stellar
thank you
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1NFeNSeErXYNgUF46jyqAcEjkCQWaYZAO?usp=sharing can i get all 4 of these blurxed 

can someone noisex this please
It left some artifacts, but its better than it was before
thanks, much better
Google Docs
New to having BlurX used, from when I was using CosmicClarity deconvolution, you do it after back ground extraction and colour calibration right?
https://1drv.ms/u/c/1ccc06d500964d40/Efb7427u821NqlfDAzfsAUgBMvyUp5URsqYk-YHpS_YjAQ?e=xsiJOL
It doesnt really matter when you use it besides that you should use it while the image is in a linear state
Also this, I forgot to stop down the lens so halos be like 
https://1drv.ms/u/c/1ccc06d500964d40/Ec7luq_e9oNDhznlL_5uq9IB5Ffw_cruX1pNQ1PJJ3-2qg?e=3m6UrB
Google Docs
There are some artifacts around the brightest stars, but I tried to get it to a point where it wasn't as noticeable
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aO9aex510lMSh7ghKCIgT_4L5CTkzq1m/view?usp=drive_link
Google Docs
Thank you so much 🙏
Looking at them now, that makes such a big difference!!! Also both have now been downloaded 👍
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Wdk2LAEL66VznmuZtwqrouxYP7J1xki8/view?usp=drive_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19HgeeGSLKX6jlXasFCLUw8wOLkYxukQF/view?usp=sharing
pls someone bx these 2 for me, use the highest bx settings u can on these without them looking overbxed
Google Docs
Google Docs
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Tb8t-3Qf529brYKoNxaZl4eCq-AU4pCd/view?usp=drive_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1B075te-SpBNXiztB-FGQwS7oPxGXTTR-/view?usp=drive_link
Google Docs
Google Docs
Sorry to ask again, Blurx saturated the core. Here's a lighter stretch, thanks.
could you please do correct only stars and 0.3 non-stellar BlurX
what is this supposed to be if you dont mind me asking
as requested
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Un5quvVERI-X_SmZRNZeZVJIDJykC3N5/view?usp=sharing
BlurX and NoiseX/DeepSNR pleaseee
Google Docs
Wym ? The object ?
If so, it's IC 3568
uhhh did you denoise my m27???
it looks peculiar
https://we.tl/t-WCVS7EuNYW @pliant valley can you apply noise and blurx
1 file sent via WeTransfer, the simplest way to send your files around the world
BlurX request: correct only stars & 0.3 non-stellar
here
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Un5quvVERI-X_SmZRNZeZVJIDJykC3N5/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CYI462AqgDdOcS_ngU8axdccA1H18y1M/view?usp=sharing
BlurX and DeepSNR
Default settings or whatever you think looks the best.
Google Docs
Google Docs
@solid pollen sry for the tag but what settinngs did you use?
@tepid verge
@echo eagle
We talk through DM and we cant send files thru there so we do it here

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1x3092dygIivZ1zqrGeC8q6X0xVGvo_xB/view?usp=sharing
blurx n noisex pls
Google Docs
@pliant valley I'd appreciate some BX and NX. I'm doing some testing so please bear with me
. Try running bx on the individual channels -> combine -> NX and then try combine -> BX -> NX. The palette is HOO of course. Thank you in advance (as for settings, mild for BX and average for NX)
And I'd like all the different files for testing
you picked the wrong day for that 
I might be able to get around to this by 8 or 9pm your time
Don't worry, the fact you do it at all is already enough for me 
@echo eagle
So basically you want 2 files
- Bx individual channels -> Combine -> NX
- Combine -> Bx -> NX
Those are the processes yeah but I'd also like the files in between
So the individual channels bxed, the combined bxed, and the two denoised ones. So they should be 5 files
ah bet
Lowk might need to ask you for blurx too
@formal phoenix either my new pix install is doing something wrong or the data is weird
am I just tripping?
Are you in the 24 bit STF mode?
I'm guessing not from the looks of this
let me figure out how to switch, I haven't had to do this on my prev install
@formal phoenix for #1
wait ignore #2
i forgot to re-run bx after correct only
And #2
Combine -> BX
Combine -> BX -> NX
Thank you very much!
Splendid file name
settings for future reference, literally middle of the road for NX
still haven't used it enough to guess what'll be good for your data
@pliant valley may I be granted a blurx as well xD
gib file
this was off by default for some reason
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19ntaxwVpUyBdTinzBl3tyZ2CaD1SsWDx/view?usp=sharing 0.15 stars (basically only correct them not make em look like pixels) and 0.3 nebulaa if possible :D
Google Docs
Correct only + this
Thank you :D
are you sure it worked?
my corner stars are still kinda borked
its the exact same image xD @pliant valley
xddd
tyyy
can someone blurx this please its already processed
Blurx is better ran before you start processing it, beyond a background extraction and colour calibration
some people bx before anything else, some after dbe / cc
is this linear data?
ah yeah looks linear to me
may I please have some noisex and blur x on this image please, .15 stars, .15 non stellar, and .25 noise reduction
and this too
@pliant valley sorry if its late to ping you now, but if you can, can you blurx this
Sorry already in bed
K won’t bother you
@leaden wyvern
my slow internet 😭
Google Docs
thank you
sure
yes please :D
@opal bluff 0.5 on bx 0.25 on nx
thanku!
@pliant valley could you blurx these please (:
Pls
can you blurx a wepb file
I can try, it should work if pixinsight can open that file type
ok, can you do this
thank you
Thank you sm 
i sent the wrong one 😭
this is the one i meant to send xD
@solid pollen could u blurx?
I can in a few hours when I'm back at my computer
Okee
Lmk when I can c:
i couldnt attach the tif cause it was too big i hope that still works
can someone blurx this for me please?
You can use google drive
i mean fits
here it is
idk if the fit is broken but try to use it if you can
@solid pollen
if someone does this, would you mind adding noiseX as well as blurX? Thanks.
@pliant valley im so sorry to bother you but would you mind running NoiseX and BlurX on this image please?
can someone blurx this for me pleases :3
