The blurryness in my photos has happened to me my past 3 astro projects and I dont know whats causing it. I know for a fact its not a focus problem as I spend a long time focusing with the asi air app as I do with all my images. I originally thought it was the location of the object because M8 is very low for me and I can only shoot it for a brief period, but so was the north american nebula when I shot it and look how sharp the north american nebula image is compared to M8. Keep in mind these were both captured with the exact same gear.
#Could someone explain the blur in the image?
44 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
The only difference is NA nebula was shot with narrowban while M8 was unfiltered. Still don't see how that would make a difference as I was able to focus fine with and without filters.
The Nebula region in the Lagoon/Trifid are relatively sharp. I'm not sure how effective BlurX will be on a jpeg though.
Also, I think there's a bumble bee in your first image ๐
Sorry, theses were after i used sharpening software on M8. Probably an artifact. Heres the un sharpenned image.
Heres the tiff
I'll slap it around and see what I can do!
oh, could you send the stacked result instead of one already stretched?
that's the stuff ๐
I think the stars are a result of whatever lens you may be using, or a combination of that and the pixel size of your camera.
This was run through StarX, then stretched, ran through NoiseX, stars added back, then BlurX (XXX!)
How come my NA nebula image turned out so sharp then?
You didn't have any dew on your lens shooting the lagoon?
No I didnt. I checked that before I started because I felt it may have been a previous calpurate.
Weird. There's definitely some soft halos around the stars in that data. Perhaps it just comes down to atmospheric conditions (transparency/humidty/etc)
When it gets humid here, my stars look very soft through each of my telescopes. It's almost like it's out of focus, but it's just as "good as it gets" during those times. I'm in the Northeast US, nealry perpetual clouds and high night time humidity all year except the winter ๐
Yeah im in the eastern US too. I shot my NA neb picture early in the summer with most likely better conditions.
Guess I just have to deal with blurry images in the summer.
Ayo were both images taken unfiltered?
NA neb was with l-enhance and lagoon was unfiltered
You don't have a uv/ir filter to use?
What lens/scope was used?
L-enhance, and most other duo narrowband filters, reduce optical abberations in most cases, so when imaging unfiltered the abberations will look 10x worse. Also depending on your cam, whether it's DSLR or astro cam, you may need a UV/IR cut. Astro cams are sensitive to IR, which caused heavy bloat, or "blurriness" to images taken without a filter.
My T7i is sensitive to IR ๐ฆ
Yii if it's full spectrum
I was using a 135 mm Rokinon f 2.0 stopped down to f2.8. My cam was ZWO ASI533MC.
Yea def go with a 2" UV/IR cut filter, the Lagoon data, from what I can tell, is suffering from bad IR bloat.
Can IR bloat really be this extreme? Ive shot unfiltered with this camera before and it didnt look bad at all.
With the Roki at f2.8?
Yeah
Do you have any examples of images taken earlier?
Off Topic: I love that pfp @mossy thunder ๐
Lol, thanks, I had that pic lying around on my cam roll and decided to see how it looked.
I had some exposures on Anatres unfiltered I was going to show you but I cant seem to find them.
It also may not show up on single subs, due to IR being faint.
The l-enhance lets IR let through so that should have made my NA neb picture less sharp, right?