#Baader MPCC Mark III vs TS Optics 0.95x

9 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

bright cargo
#

Does anyone know which of these two coma correctors is better?
https://www.astroshop.eu/flatteners-correctors-reducers/baader-mpcc-mark-iii-multi-purpose-newton-coma-correktor/p,33547
https://www.astroshop.eu/flatteners-correctors-reducers/ts-optics-komakorrektor-0-95x-2-/p,66724

Baader MPCC Mark III - Multi Purpose Newton Coma Correktor

The only coma corrector for Newtonian telescopes which does not increase the focal length or reduce the field of view of the telescope.Large aspherical mirrors are ideal for dee...

TS Optics Komakorrektor 0.95x 2"

A coma corrector is a corrective lens for Newtonian telescopes. This type of telescope can cause distortion of the image at the edge of the field of view, making stars look like...

last lantern
#

I’d say the ts one

#

As far as I know the baader mpcc corrects the field at the expense of fuzzier/ softer images

#

I personally use the GPU coma corrector and it is really good

kindred crystal
#

Also depends on your f/ ratio. I'd probably take a look at the TS GPU or the skywatcher quattro coma correctors first (they are the same one) as they are ones of the best around for f/4-f/5, but according to some people, the mpcc is decent for f/6 scopes

violet turtle
#

I heard some people say that the mpcc creates spherical aberrations

#

Don't know about the other one though

#

But if you buy a coma corrector, buy a good one

#

Having to crop to the center of the sensor is better than having defaults across the whole field imo