#is 10 inch gso dobsonian good
198 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Get an 8 inch dob
It seems counter intuitive to go smaller but you should never buy a dob bigger than 8” if you don’t have experience with 8”
Later if you want you can sell it, and use the money from that + leftover budget to find a bigger one
What bortle do you live in btw?
But if a 8 inch newtonian on a bresser exos 2 go to mount
I have two two house one in bortle 2 and one in bortle 4 and mostly live in bortle 4 region
Alright bortle is good.
You would only be able to use it visually, not photography.
But an 8" dob has more value imo
Why only visual for newtonian on goto mount
It might be worth getting a 10" dob actually since u have a pretty good bortle level. That is if you can move it because it's heavy
Because the 8" is too heavy for that mount.
Oh then a 6 inch f5
Do you want to photograph, do visual observing, see planets or deepsky
Both
All?
Yes
What budget?
It's a bit hard to get a rig that can do all of the things for that amount.
Do you have a camera?
Maybe if you buy used stuff you can.
Ok thanks , I don't have a camera but is the exos 2 goto mount good
People don't really recomend it but i don't really know you can ask in #🤓-ask-a-nerd
skywatcher eqm35 and a 150pds
Pds ?
it's skywachers astrophotography 6" newt model. You can find it on astroshop here: https://www.astroshop.eu/telescopes/skywatcher-telescope-n-150-750-pds-explorer-bd-eqm-35-pro-synscan-goto/p,59456#specifications
you'll probably want a coma corrector for it too though
Yep
And a barlow for planetary
And eyepieces
And a camera
And a powerbank
And a laptop or asiair i think
And the shipping cost
God sunngifu I SWEAR you're getting on my nerves
you dont need all of that
I mean you really do
ya dont
How tf would you image without a camera, or use the scope visually without eyepieces, or how would you power it💀
no need for a barlow or eyepieces as it comes with a 28mm, no need for a powerbank... it can charge with a car battery or wall plug
Okay thats one eyepiece which is not enough for planetary
laptop or asiair arent necessary
And still need a barlow
he didnt say he wanted planetary
He wants all
Thats fair but in the future
well that's for him to decide, adding unnecessary stuff in the beggining can easily throw off a person
eyepieces aren't necessary.... a 28mm and barlow is better than having those pesky low mm eyepieces
Still a barlow, more eyepieces for visual, a camera and a coma corrector🙂
I have used a bunch of eyepieces and that 28mm LET is all you need
1 sec
it really isnt... any eyepieces you get at the budget he has will be shite
Still missing out on magnification for planetary, unless MAYBE you get a 5x barlow, but still at 134x
I'll remove the laptop or asiar, but other things i will keep
Then he has to up the budget... which is also kinda my point
Ofc he doesn't need them right away but it's good to know
If neither of those aren't an option😉 once again, telling him what he might need
Also what did i do to you😂😭
Telling you an eq5 isn't enough for an 8"?
yep.... a bunch of times.... you keep saying stuff that aren't true, from experience I've told you multiple times that the eq5 perfectly handles an 8" and you still continue spreading misleading stuff
It aint that deep get over it yes i told you eq5 isn't enough so did everybody else and yes i have said some wrong things but no one can ever say anything perfect. I'll try to be as proffesional as i can sometimes i'm not. don't want hate between us so lets forget this
alright, but "everybody else" are people that very much likely haven't tried to put an 8" f/5 on an eq5.... Next time base yourself on someone who actually has some experience with eq5s and 8 inchers....
Some say it works some say it doesn't. For you it works, great. Also you have to listen to others peoples opinions, ur not gonna buy an expensive thing and next night see oh it doesn't work
"some say it doesnt" -> haven't tried it and rely on a rumor or did not pa/balance correctly
"for you it works" not just for me, I'm in an ap club and there are like 6 people with 8" on eq5s including that modded c8 and they ALL work fine unguided untuned....
I think 2 of em actually have mono setups on the gear, full on cooled cam filterwheel coma corrector field flattener/reducer.
they usually get .6" tracking
but those are tuned so idk
I get .8" tracking with the dslr and stuff
if I take off the finderscope I can go down to .7
Ok so you are saying it's okay to go 90% of the weight limit with any mount?
If not, why is eq5 different
never said that
idk
Okay so why is the eq5 different
haven't tested other mounts so idk abt them
but the eq5 can def handle it
that's why I recommend the eq5 only
and not like an exos 2
but again... hey, if you wanna keep saying whatever message you're spreading feel free to go on... I'm just saying there's no need for someone to increase their budget by 500 to get an heq5 when they will be perfectly okay with an eq5
Okay i'll do some research because i'm a bit curious
I don't
mind if I take this example from cn
where tf did ya find that
motion blur is when stuff is apparently in motion... good tracking means no motion blur
I don't get motion blur in 95% of my shots
and that's at 20kn wind
Why are you fighting 😑
its called coma
i swear this guy has some kind of inner will to disprove everything i say lmao
I thought you have a coma corrector
Because he doesn't understand that an eq5 isn't a safe option
"I have used the 200PDS on a HEQ5 with mixed results - mostly not very good. It's a beast of a scope and will test the HEQ5 in all but perfect conditions. Add a camera and a guide scope and I reckon you will struggle to balance it with the included 10kg of counterweight, which should tell you something..."
i never mentioned using a heq5
I only refer to the eq5
the issue he refers to is balancing
No...
I can perfectly balance it with the guidescope
He said the results were not very good most of the times
..
because of balancing
seriously can you not read
also tests show that the eq5 out of the box has better tracking than heq5
of course payload capacity is different
but
yk
Have class rn can't talk
alr
It's not recommended
It's an EQ5 but the issue is the goto system is ass cheeks and the QC is ass
i find it odd someone arguing repeatedly using strictly quotes from people yet doesnt own it versus the guy who has one and uses it. and hangs with 8 other guys in person thats also using it. but anyway.. real life use trumps heresay. everytime. looks like someone just wants to try to win an argument honestly.
man. id love to have a 10 dob. maybe in a year or so. 🙂
This is the most ridiculous conversation
lmao yeas
People say 60-50% for a reason. Ur rig might not but it's not perfect
And i would not recomend it because ur not gonna get perfect results like you would with a better mount or a smaller scope
As a matter of fact someone eq5 broke after a year because of too much payload lmao
So were gonna end it here. It works but u won't get perfect results
for gods sake can you not understand
you will never get "perfect results"
I'm just saying there won't be much of an improvement and for some starting out its not worth the heq5
Not perfect
It doesn't work PERFEFTLY fine
it does
It works fine
fine and perfectly fine are different
thats what i'm saying
I get what u mean it works FINE
But why would you want it fine if you can get it GOOD
fine means it works fine.... perfectly fine means you don't get errors and bad tracking and stuff while saying just fine will unintentionally give a message that something bad may happen every once in a while
perfectly fine isbetter than good
God damn can you not understand a written message
Yeah it works fine meaning the tracking isn't that accurate and the results won't be as good as u'd want
tracking is that accurate thats my point
results are as good as I'd want
my mount is not an issue or concern at all
info
who and how much payload
what broke
also "someone" one single f'ing person out of tens of thousands who have an eq5
where'd you see 50-60% saying no? in this thread there's like 3 people against ya and you're by yourself....
4*
Many say
ya gotta specify bro
many ppl say the earth is flat
doesn't make it true
and what they say is and hear me out in order
"general advice" - not directed
"not a hard rule" -cmon really
"I think/normally" -yep that's right
Jacob99 - no specific reason, just not specific to the eq5, it's general advice
those are generalized for ap, if you look at the specific eq5/8" bundle, it works great
Yes thats why u shouldn't pass it because generally it's too much
It's best at or under 50-60%
doesn't apply to the eq5/8" combo
it is, but there is near to no difference compared to the 8", only upwards from that does it start goin really bad
It's going to get worse and worse every time you add more weight. 50% is the highest best, above that ur gonna start having some problems
and again, no problems here at the 90-105% gang
just learn to admit you're wrong, theres no issue with it, we will accept it and this discussion will soon vanish from our memories, you're talking to someone who has experience with the eq5 other than some statistic based opinions and refuse to admit that theyre right because a couple people told you generalized advice for other mounts
Yea we can forger it, but i don't get it why people recomend 50-60% if can actually be at 100%
because they refer to "most mounts" and not the eq5 particularly
Ok but why is the eq5 different
Ok so the eq5 can carry 10kg without a problem?
in our club we use electronically assisted balancing so it makes sense that all our eq5d work right
yep
Ok i'll belive you.
But theres still questions, why is the heq5 worse
it's not worse, but out of the box the eq5 has better accuracy for low weights
of course if you put 15kg on the heq5 it'll handle much better
eq5's gears would prob break lmao
Alright thanks for explaining everything to me.
no problem dude :)
What's heq5 and eqt ?😜
Heq5 is a better version of the eq5. But as kerbal said, the eq5 can carry the 200pds without a problem, and it also has a bit better tracking out of the box.
wow i read it all, 🤪 i should probably get back to work
