#Phone Astrophotography
1 messages · Page 21 of 1
Orion from my skies
Moon
Do y'all know how to prevent that blue diffraction thingy
Well
Basically that chromatic aberration is caused by inconsistencies in lenses, so it could be the telescope lens if you're using a refractor, or it could be the phone camera causing it.
Basically, use an actual good camera, and/or a high quality refractor.
And if you aren't seemingly made of money (like some people on this server), you can easily edit them out manually
alternatively, if you don't care about the color variations on the moons surface, you technically could also make it a B&W image so it's not as obvious
mmmm pixels
don't eat my images please
What was ur focus point?
Make it like this , India does have good low light in villages
uhh idk
Jupiter's moons captured with only the S22 Ultra 10x lens.
1/4s
ISO 1600
Better image 2s ISO 500
no scope?
yeah
Nope, just phone
thats very impressive 🙂
My high ass thought the leaf blower was like an extension tube or some shit 😭😭
2 minutes of orion low on the horizon with full moon
finally decided to try deep sky stacker out
i don't think i'll be going back to sequator
2 mins during a full moon?! what bortle?
5
comparison to overprocessed sequator image
i might restack all of my 10x images with dss and see how much i can improve the images
yeye just letting u know if u try to stack an image with foreground in dss the likelihood of it messing up is much higher
yeah sequator tends to work fine with wider field photos
I'm guessing this was with an S22/23 Ultra
Yep
nice to see more people using the S22s, they're some of the best phones for standalone AP if you dont have a telescope or a phone mount
(as long as you have 20 hours to spend on a single target)
Xiaomi:
Xiaomi is really good from what I've seen, I'm just unsure of how they perform apart from milky way or paired with a telescope
Samsung a55 good?
from what I see, the main camera should be more than adequate for milky way shots or used with a scope
use what you have
dont buy a new phone just for astro
it aint worth it, rather choose a star tracker and dslr or just used dslr with tripod
they probably already own an a55 and are wondering if it is any use for astro
Doesn't have raw so might wanna consider better options than that if you're planning to buy otherwise if you have it then you gotta make it work somehowb
Dp any clear skies??
Nope , back in city where everything's shitty
I'll have access to clear skies in maybe decemeber end
lol here too dude i am tired
be ready
in india there pretty good low artifical light in villages, dont judge with just bortle class
my village in india was around bortle 5 or 4 but in compared to here in usa, its way LESS LIGHT POLLUTION ARHHH
I won't have my device with me then lol, that was my best bet to get what I need but, I'll have my phone with me which is not great compared to nothing
Then thing is I'm not in village, I was in my village this diwali , but now i'm back in a city so yeah
hm kind of disappointing but check out places near your city , but choose a place after knowing where your target will be
nice
I'll try this out tbh , I'm still not satisfied w my data
not much data,
They're auto stacks made by gcam, they don't seem like much but its equivalent to around 720*20s exposures
Oh that's a good data
The problem with my is the BIG 3 LIGHTS OF THE CHURCH
So it made more noise even though I was 2 mile away from my city core area
Ive samsung a53, ill probably say, pretty good on video
You cant take raw pic from samsung a series
Planetary was good with scope
Heres my pic of jupiter w/scope
It doesn't support RAW I think
What scope did you use?
@grizzled lance can i see some of your images?
hmm
the camera is not allignet to the eyepiece perfectpy
thats why the images are not the best
Celestron 80eq
Is the picture of ring nebula like is it aligned properly
not quite
when you align the camera to eyepiece perfectly you can see the edges very sharp
lemme show you an example
discord just mess up our photos lol]
which is better?
14
16
1
stacked
ofc, no
Andromeda reprocessed
vs original
god I cant wait till I get to image with my phone again
generative expand 💀 🙏
so glad AI is absolutely stupid
HOW
Magic
What you guys think about Xiaomi 14T pro?
is it a good idea to do ap with the periscope telephone lens on the s22 or s23 ultra
im hoping to try it with my s22u but i got clouds for the foreseeable future
lmk how it goes
Exif?
I will try getting the red planet tonight
BTW I can see the stripes of jupiter with my eye, but my phone camera can't resolve it
What's wrong
what does it see?
could be overexposed or out of focus
Msybe
Stacked image
stacking moon will ruin mostly.
What you guys think about Xiaomi 14t pro?
it has a good camera
Very capable sensor
guys, should I go for a telescope and phone or dslr w telephoto lens ?
Dslr
if you're going for better quality photos in general, go DSLR and you can get a telescope later on
a lot of phone APers just do it because its fun to see what you can accomplish with it
Telescope (refractor)and used Dslr
What's your budget
Captured this, I think I did decent
You did good but did you stack ?
Nope
Okay what's the settings used and equipment
I might help if it's just phone
30 second exposure and 640 ISO
No equipment used
I went for 640 because the moon will rise I don't want the moon outshining the stars
What's the bortle class?
haha nice you got pleiades
Yeah
Might lower the exposure and use default zoom 1x
I don't even owe a tripod
And the zoom is 1x
It's supposed to be normal or smth? I'm kinda new
Without star tracker it's easily gets star trailing
Use 15 seconds
And take continuous many photos
i do NOT own any equipment just pure phone 
Same over here but I have 20 dollar tripod
So don't worry it's really good 👍
I'll try later I took this yesterday
Yeah take as many photos as u can
It's called integration time
If you take 100 photos, one photo of 15 seconds, you will get 25 min exposure (more exposure means more light )
me has mars moon thingy with a plane and then zoomed in moon
So I gotta set my Stutter to 15 seconds??
yep check the trialling
It's 11 am i CANNOT test this out 😔
at night
So what's my iso going to be?
whats your bortle class??
check it on "light pollution map" in google
write this and choose the second one
what's that suppose to mean
it shows your light pollution
bortle 1(darkest) is lowest- bortle 9 is brightest(bad for astrophotography)
its a past data, only light
just see dude
400-500$
This one is from 2005 iirc so might wanna switch it to trend mode to really get the idea of your bortle class in present
waguri
https://darksitefinder.com/map/?i=/%234/39.00/-98.00 go here, its a simple map, go check your location and say what color is it
this might be the easiest way to teaching man
Star trackers are mad expensive where I live so I'll probably have to make one or find one in used market I'll try to find dslrs within my budget been eyeing canon 1500d withh 55-250mm lens and kit lens
complete beginner here - I tried taking pictures of the moon, jupiter, and saturn with my dob
it’s also been overcast here for practically two months straight and I am sobbing 
Lower your exposure for jupiter and saturn
I kept it to 640
Gcam does a great job at stacking ngl
whats gcam?
who here knows how to use open live stacker?
i want to photograph jupiter and orion with this app
who here can help me take pics of orion and stack them
android phone btw
from b6 thats insane
Google camera, pixel camera basically which has astrophotography mode which auto stacks and gives out an image after 4 mins
wait is that for premium version only or not?
use low exposure, the trialling ia very much
Its a mod apk for any phone basically
How do you stack 😭
How do you do this??
You need to take a lot of pictures of the same target. Then use a stacking program like siril or dss to stack them all together. Watching a video would help
I used Gcam to capture it
Do you have a computer?
Use deep sky stacker
I will send a basic tutorial for dss
Relatively accurate bortle 5 naked eye view of Orion
Can only see it like that on the best nights though
Yeah literally looks like that form my area aswell
Slowly getting better
it looks much better
i like how there is no noise at all, just pure clean stars
Thx learned from a guy to tell me about the focus
this image is stacked right?
oh
I don't even know how to stack
30 sec?
Pretty sure it's only for people who owes laptops or pcs
luckly i bought a laptop
learned how to stack plsnets
with video
but not photos
of dso or stars
it's pretty easy
I explained how to add the script to stack with only lights here
#1020657687291252797 message
After that you just add the images to a folder called lights, put that folder in another folder , click the home button and open that folder, then start the script that was added
To start the script just click scripts and click the one you installed
I think you can do on your phone.. it wouldn't be as good and fast as a laptop or a pc but yeah you can
And if you want I can do the stacking and editing for you
i don't think you can stack on a phone
astroshader has livestacking i think but there's nothing that I know of on mobile that can stack normal images
Compatible samsung galaxy phones have the astrophotography mode that does a 4, 7, or 10 minute stack. But i've had very mixed results from that. Not to mention the fact that they changed it about a year ago to no longer be real raw images, just over processed jpgs in a .dng container
depends what phone, only tye new s models do
yeah I should have mentioned that
First time trying calibration frames
what app
Hello,what are you shooting?
attempted to shoot M36 and M38, though I doubt it will work given they're rather small and faint.
dss doesn't seem to like it so far
yeah nah that didn't work
i'll try again another time, probably on a brighter target
I did get this of Mars and M44 last night though it's not my cleanest image
also no idea what that weird purple streak is
Wait
Don't try to focus on planets right now
Go with 1x default zoom, change your tripod position every 10 images if using around 10 seconds of exposure, iso depends on your bortle scale and yeah please don't focus on planets rn it won't be as good as bright dson
I've captured Andromeda this is my current I will capture another one do you think I'll do better than before?
Okay now say the settings
I might make it more clear
S:30 ISO:800 FOCUS: INFINITY
I set my wb to auto
Lower the exposure
alright
It does look ever so slightly out of focus
Make it to 20 or 15
Due to higher exposure
And use 1x zoom
My phone can only go 10,20,30 apparently
No I just use something to stand my phone I'll get one soon
It looks like the phone is getting some shake during the exposure
Okay don't worry but Also clean the lens if you can
And see if there's something shaking the camera
when you zoom in and the stars look kind of bubbly, that's how you can tell if the focus was slightly out. though that's just nitpicking as its close enough
Yeah it's out of focus
My lense are clean the light pollution is killing me
same
Don't worry use 20 second exposure
Sad
my current botched setup is balancing my phone on my binoculars
I'll try later it's cloudy
Let me see if I have my first Andromeda photo
Should I just get a Binacoulars instead of a telescope
I mostly find them fake ngl I have low budget
And star tracker or untracked with tripod
Yeah it will ruin it
my sister recently got a DSLR for her photography course idk whether to ask her if i can use it for astrophotography
as much as I like astrography it's expensive as heck
Stacked and stretched
Yeah
You can but make sure you don't break anything
Dude whenever I edit on snap speed and maxed my structure it ends up with some ugly stars
It's done with random stacked and editing but yeah it's done in dss
Don't max it
Idk I won't be able to get a bit of detail if I don't
yeah that's why i use adobe lightroom, could never wrap my head around snapseed or whatever its called
I'm leaning lr rn
I'll try to edit my best shot
Here
I was able to give more light to orion
Set to 4000 or 5000
Cant
Vega image from earlier this year that I forgot to process
Cleean
4 min on the Milky Way in a bottle like 3.5 sky
Looks like out of focus
But still a great photo 👍
maybe a discord issue but nice photo ]
hyades n plieades
lower the iso
also if you zoomed in it might be in only JPEG
yeah that also but maybe he is in light pollutiomn area so he might go on lower iso
that's from my shaky aa hands and the fact that I balanced my phone on an empty box of mangoes to get the right angle
true

I'm not joking.
stand on the stool looking thing
the only tripod I have is way too wobbly for that
one slight touch and it'll shake for like a minute
dam
barely noticeable but turns stars into lines
what are some of the best astrophotography phones
someone bless us with this info
because don’t some phones have filters that block H alpha light
is the xiaomi 14 ultra good
dont buy a phone for astrophotography specifically
ik im just asking lmao
prolly a Xiaomi Mi 9T
https://www.astrobin.com/users/Lucasgoncalvesmiranda/
stuff taken with it
what abt xiaomi 12
what about non xiaomi
ik xiaomi is best but I'll probably get a pixel or samsung
rn i have a s20+
Xiaomi 12 is goof
Good
Pixel and Samsung r best
Budget phone cna work I got amazing pics
specific pixel or samsungs that are good tho?
i was thinking about s22 ultra but i might do s23+ or normal 24
I like the periscope telephoto
pixels are good, i wouldnt buy them specifically for AP but overall their good for daily use and the occasional AP
what about telephoto
don't they have 5x optical and they advertise same quality as 10x but it's bad
To be honest, any phone you use will be good if it has pro options
And if you have that money to spend on, maybe buy a dSLR and lens.
With the exception of iphone and maybe some newer Samsungs, their raw files aren't entirely raw
Maybe that might be case
Generally any phone that packs a modern Sony IMX sensor is considered to perform exceptionally well for astrophotography
This Luca's words
Lucas is using a patent cooler on his phone for active cooling
Some time ago he used to use Mi9t for his astro
Now he uses his Xiaomi 12
But I'm pretty sure he still uses his Mi9t at some occasions
So if ur interested in buying a phone that also performs well with astro buy a phone that doesn't overheat easily and that has a Sony IMX sensor with generous aperture to capture light
Thing with the IMX sensors put inside phones is that they are pretty similar to the IMX sensors put in professional astro cameras...which means that theoretically u could get similar results
Of course though it's not only about the sensor but the entire camera setup that's different with mobile phones and professional astro cameras...this doesn't mean though that with proper in-phone settings, a cooling patent and good editing skills u can't get pretty darn good results...proof for this is Lucas who is like a superstar on this server
Hope I was helpful enough
Also I bought a pixel 8a just a couple of weeks ago...still waiting for clear skies to test it out bruh
But when I do I'll let u guys know my impressions
But a pixel with an IMX sensor could really be ideal
Google camera proly best camera app out there
I will do that later, I already do widefield phone ap and I'm already going to buy a new phone soon and I just want it to be good at ap
I want to have the periscope telephoto tho, but s23 ultra is too expensife
s22 ultra i could do but idk
is the normal s24 good?
what do the pixels even go up to
isnt 8 the newest
or no
why is a pixel better than anything else
Generally yes if you're just using it with an eyepiece and phone mount, but for standalone not much can beat an S22 or 23 ultra's telephoto lens
I have S23 U it's super good I can send pictures of what I've got
Budget phones still do quite a good job
Just look for phones that has a big sensor size
9 pro XL is the latest most expensive in the series
because of the camera app...I wrote it above if u check
Yes standalone, I'm never going back to phone+scope ap
it does
a lot
a s9+ is terrible
while my s20+ is pretty good
even tho it's 2 phones apart
...
wdym not milky way
if you have done any other than that
that's pretty much always gonna be in a phone widefield since nothing interesting is far from the mw band
mw band?
orion constellation, pleiades
mw band??
mw is in my image of them
whats that
milky way band
ohh
yeah i mean milky way is probably a good idea for phone ap
but i dont get core here in northern hem
no
yeah but there's more than the core
we can do more than milky way
yeah but southern get much more area
ik but im saying everything that's interesting on phone is close to the mw band
send me your ap photos
so it's gonna be there
yeah true
hmmm its nice tho
mw is there but the orion and pleiades take the spotlight
when we say miky way, we mean wide field
i blew out orion core to get barnards loop
whats the setting and inte time>
this is wide field
i think it was 15mins of 640iso 15s exposures bortle 7
yeah the proccesing is not that good
bruh
?
yeah that's widefield and my image is too
thats goodd
okay okay
did you zommed in or default 1x and then cropped
crop
bc my stars at the edges are terrible
even in that image they're bad
in the uncropped version it's so bad
my other widefield
What phone?
great photos grand
nothing phone 1
same data but different people did the processing
it was bortle 5 tho
what fl
uh maybe 24 mm
it was defualt zoom
so yeah that might be
and 40 min integration time, there was 4 big street light of the church so more noise compared to a bortle 5 place with no near street light
How come your fov is so small without a telephoto lens?
but what makes the app so good lol
You got that on yout phone?
Wthhh
yes
s20+ bortle 7
possibly bortle 8
What settings did you use
Did it come with raw camera thing
The astrophotography node
Mode
Y not
use deepskycamera
Oh
it sucks
it's the best android app for imaging that i know of
so dsc is like the only other android option
nothings wrong with it
some people complain about the ui but it's fine imo
Well first of all Google camera has proly the best postprocessing AI out of any other camera app out there
Google pixel is real good
not useful for ap
😭
it's easy
Did you use just use phone or telescope
just phone
I'm impressed
You get good results trust me
i did it for a few months
i will never ever go back
Its a pain but I've got good results without even aligning it properly
Good point
Yeah phone and telescope can be a hassle
But yk it is what it is
Lemme send whta I've got
a lot of the pain was from my specific setup tho
I'll send like 3 pics
helical focuser with uneven weight on it is just begging for the focuser to slip, happened a lot
and also mount that refuses to function properly
this was 5 mins i think
it was supposed to be 150x20s
Nah that ainr phone
it is
Is it staxked
How did you track it
it was the one time my dumbass mount decided to function
What mount
virtuoso gti
i have to fight with it for an hour minimum every time I use it to force it to work
but m51 set behind my roof
I should try it
You def need to
B7
This looks way better than my individual subs
Yeah I got the dust lanes using another phone in b6
Andromeda is just a faint Grey patch for me
30 sec exposure and like 1600 iso
Mw is invisible
I agree
Its somewhat visible for me
Ik it's obvious in your pic
Stacking is so op
Wait are u talking about visual or image
I have never seen it😿
A faint line
With darker sides
But it's not like you cna see the whole thing
Its defo visible tho
Do you live in the UK?
i just see grey at night
This is what I cna see
B5
And this is like
If I wanna take long exposure image
Its still kind a crap
Light pollution is bad
Andromeda is barely visible but it looks like a smudge
It's cropped
How did you get so much detail then
😉
It's just integration time and because of bortle scale 5
2015 data
Also I changed it's position frequently like every 20-30 photos so I can get more details on corners but even with that I lost many side details and due to street light just beside me, also Gave boost to noise
Hopefully next time I will change the place to more dark place without any Street light near that church but without that i am risking my life to dangerous situations
man my phone sucks for ap
it’s a regular iphone 13
no pro
the camera just auto denoises the shit out of every image
I also have the same IPhone 13 this is one of the best pictur
b6 skys
it's not tho
what do you mean?
if you got 1000 hrs int time on andromeda with a 100mm fl you aren't gonna have more detail than 10h int time at 2500mm fl
because you can't resolve it
its 40 min of integration. 10 seconds*250 light frames
int time helps with signal
yeah
not sharpness
i mean i dont have answers for that cause "it is what it is" situation
maybe bortle scale
helped me
Wait nvm
and he migt did drizzle
It's bc nothing phone 1 only has 2 lenses, 1 ultra wide and 1 50mp wide
i used wide not ultra wide
nothing phone 1 camera is not special in any way
Deepskycamera only uses your main lens
the main camera is 50mp
i didnt used deek sky camera
is it meant for astro
intervals
nah
it is same as orginal camera but has settings for interval
i dont pay, i am broke( university student)

deepskycamera is free
It's just that some apps don't take real raws
like samsungs pro mode processes their raws
hmm nah this was raw
omg
so if that app processes their raws it wouldn't be good
let me check, i dont think they proccess but let me check
Idk tho, I never used that app
its a good app doesnt give any problems
Reason I say it might be processed is bc this looks a bit off
it's the 50mp sensor
for others not for me 
trying to push the limits of phone is what makes me in interested in phone astrophotography. even i had old phone i would do it
yeah it's still heavily dependent on what phone you have
This is taken with the pixel 9 pro fold camera on its own, it's about 30 mins of data, no tracking, no tripod, just the phone and stacking and processing software
interesting colors
ngl the dull looks better, the other one looks kind overproccesed but still both are great photos congo
I don't like the dull lol, I prefer more color
Idk it's just more appealing to the eye imo, I even asked my photography teacher and he said he likes the saturated one more
It's looks unreal*
imo the more dull one is good and the saturated one is extremely oversaturated and i always oversaturate my stuff
heres one with a starmask applied
(the saturation looks a lil diff on different devices for me so on my pc it def looks a little oversaturated)
It's a star mask so I removed all the stars then overlayed the brighter ones on it so it was less cluttered
does anyone here use astroshader?
thank you!
I do exclusively
yes
🔥
Redmi note 8 pro + astromaster 70az, 900mm focal length (20mm eyepiece)
Redmi note 8 pro sensor - 1/1.76inch 64mp
For anyone wondering
What is the size of your phones main sensor?
Oh it's stacked so nvm
Google it
What's yo phone name?
s20+
64mp telephoto
why?
deepskycamera hasn't added lens switching support yet
and it's not a real telephoto
the fov is the same
it's just higher resolution
hmm
?
🫡🤣

im still waiting for this too lmfao
deepskycamera plus samsung's 10x would go so hard
The developer will release the Pro version this December. But I'm not sure if it will already come with the option to switch lenses in this version.
might have resolved a mag 18 star
oh mahh gawd, i just remeber you the LUCAS, i saw your milky way photo from astrobin and it was amazing..... i also do phone ap but didnt get much good sessions( only one). i dont have a mount like you but still its fun to do with simple tripod.
New toy 
lucas, do you plan to use phone ap for different targets like orion constellation and other specified targets?? heres my first try of orion constellation. ( i am damn sure you will nail it)
and if you have tricks for phone and tripod ap?? please let me know and also let me know if i did anything wrong..
phone: nothing phone 1
iso: 800, exposure: 10 seconds, integration time : 41min 40sec
b4 6" dob
thx
Did you use a phone to take the pic?
ofc wanna see the whole pic?
im tryna push phone ap to the liimits
3600x1sec exposures
I haven't done orion nebula but I did other objects
Damnnn
Oh yeah cuz you have a dobsonian
I'm very impressed
Also how can you tell if you properly aligned your phone to the eyepiece
it was a huge pain to get that many subs
i just increese the iso a lot and then adjust the alignment until the pic is brightest
I can relate lmao everytime when I take a pic and it's blurry I have to go inside and fix the phone with the eyepiece
Alr ill do that in December holiday only time I'm free
also all the pics have to be almost perfectly alligned with eachother
or else kaboom
I have a few good pics but I don't even know if it's aligned properly
I have this one but someone said the edge have to be really sharp to be aligned
Its mid pic there's noise
this is amazing nick. one of the best photo i have ever seen using phone
should i download deepskycamera for phone ap? does it have lot of bugs?
idk, never used it, people say its better than astroshader but i disagree
why?
why ive never used it or y people say its better
i have never seen a good pic taken with deep sky cam
🤣
or atleast better than astroshader
u got an iphone?
im afraid astroshader is only for iiphones
only a new phone
oh no problem
i already have a app already that i trust but i want to try deep sky camera as it has more features the app i have
can it sstack?
no i stack on deep sky stacker and edit in siril
astroshader stacks and edits
will u ever get a telescope?
yes but not rn i have university fees to pay for
doesn't Lucas use deepskycamera
3 second from b9 looking better than any other I've taken
more
Yep!
I need to make a widefield of the southern Milky Way, capturing Carina. It's the only one I haven't done yet with the Mi12. I only have a very old one with the Mi9T on a fixed tripod. I want to do it with the mount
I'm going to capture some better DSOs now with the telescope. I got a much better mount, so it will handle my telescope better. My old one was blurring my photos when it was windy.
Nice
Yes you can!!
Eagle Image Stacker, baby! 😁
On a side note
Shot on Pixel 8 Pro, 115mm
Looks hella better without compression
It is lol
It's pretty niceee😀
use deep sky stacker if you have laptop or pc. its free
oh I guess an app exists now, got any stacked results?
#MotionCamPromasterrace
EIS is comparable tho, even has calibration frames integration (darks, flats)
I use motioncam for shooting/acquisitions and timelapses, EIS for stacking
All of the above are pixel 8 pro, with 115mm lens
Welp, it looks horrible here
thats actually really good for phone software
might be good for me in a pinch or im too lazy to transfer files
It's super convenient and elegant
Aw it costs $10
Really interesting though
Yes, it's not free unfortunately but tbh I am a mobile only enthusiast
If I had money maybe 
With a kid I appreciate the impromptu nature of being able to work and resume on my stuff
On the go
At any moment
It does average stacking too for normal pics
And I've seen some use it for HDR and focus stacking even though not originally meant for it
Sounds useful not only if you don't have a computer also if you don't have the time to do all of it
Exactly
Ooo
Imma try on my 70 gig raw data
Its seems useful you know without sacrificing your storage
I've tried some large amounts, curious if it can take on that 😄
I've done a few gigs worth of MotionCam raw video when trying moon shots and such, worked fine
Wait you can insert video?
Unfortunately no, but I've shot raw video which then I exported into individual DNGs
So mad amounts of files and sizes dumped to it
Guys is it possible to take a video of a planet and get like a stacked image from it
yes
that is what all of us phone ap-ers do
i can teach you if you want
@grizzled lance
Yes
Lucky imagining
Use the motioncam demo and burst that beech
Raw video, 5 second limiter on demo but let's say 30fps
150 dngs/5 seconds
Go Brtt
yes. thats how planetary astro works.
Any tips for geminid meteor shower with phone and tripod
?!
Like what should we take video or long exposure, shot exposure?
I'm guessing you're shooting with your main camera and not a telephoto
if so, I'd say 10 second exposures is good
unless you want to shoot a timelapse of course
but if you're going for one single stacked image, shoot it like you would normally shoot a milky way picture
lower ISO maybe to see if you can get more color out of the trails (dont know if this is true but it's good to experiment)
which would be better, timelapse or just single 10 second expsoure
wouldnt the exposure make things worse?? sorry if it doesnt make sense. i dont know how to do timelapse so confused
hmm what is most preffered and succesful to capture showers>
both can do amazing things
hmm
the timelapse is generally easier
like 10 seconds will make meteor trails right
but in my opinion the stacked image is absolutely beautiful
well meteor trails are bright enough to be picked up by exposures as short as probably hundredths of a second
mhm no problem
just gotta sift through the clear ones
so maybe tommorow
??
and if it's scattered, you can just do a timelapse
yeah lets see
clear exposures that is*
atleast i want to see one with naked eye
mhm, basically what you would do with a normal astrophoto
didnt liked much
well you're trying to cram as much information as possible into one picture and this is the best way to do it
yeah thats the best bet
no worries
like its cool but seems odd right
your phone's timelapse feature should just do the trick
honestly it's more unique than odd
i have to learn how to do that so i will practise tonight
something you dont see often
yeah its unique and i appretiate it
I did 30 sec exposure and 3200 Iso 8 got 2 meterorites but some star trails
This is the reprocess of one hour of completely untracked data (means the phone just stayed still, i didn't even reframe, and at the time I got this data I didn't know that would cause weird stacking artifacts, mainly the dark lines you see). This was in Bortle 6 and the gradients in the final stack were so horrible it needed not one but two gradient removals. Also there was more noise than signal so GraXpert's denoise went brrrr on this, it did a great job, but it probably hallucinated a few stars along the way lol. But yeah, this data is terrible to deal with, Bortle 6 really ain't it for untracked milky way, but at least i got something out of it.
Xiaomi 11T Pro, Bortle 6. Sequator, GraXpert, GIMP
nice, what phone?
Yes, it has a bearing on the DEC axis (unlike the EQ5), and its structure is also more robust. I will use it with OnStep
It is?
I thought it had some issue
I might get that then, I was planning on getting an eq5 and onstepping it
Re-edit of a shot from last year. iPhone13: 50x, 4s, ISO 3000
(Second attempt after some funky discord compression)
What I know is that sometimes they come with more backlash than the EQ5. But it’s very easy to adjust.
Mine came without backlash
I think the issues are more related to the stock motorized version of it. Since I’ll be using OnStep, I won’t have those gears that connect the motor to the axes. Those cause a lot of backlash.
That’s why there’s the pulley upgrade kit for the HEQ5 Pro
Yo Lucas what's up
🫡
So since I'm planning to onstep whatever I get since pro version is too expensive I shouldn't have any issue?
also btw, is onstep hard to install? I know like nothing about it
If it comes like mine exos, then no. I haven’t motorized mine yet, but since I modified an entire generic EQ3 to install OnStep, I already have an idea of how it will perform. For my setup, the Exos is very stable. Testing it with the knobs, the movement is quite smooth. Way more smooth than mine eq3
pretty much anything will be better than my current mount
so even if it does have backlash issues i could fix that later
And I used to guide with around 0.80 total error on the EQ3, which was already very good.
It just wasn’t stable for my OTA when it was windy or even with a light breeze.
It's easy. The Exos even has a ready-made OnStep kit for sale on AliExpress
Considering that the movement of the knobs is very smooth, there’s no reason for it to perform poorly without guiding. It should maintain the correct tracking speed well. I plan to install OnStep on it this month. When I test it, I’ll let you know here
could u send a link if u have it?
i don't see it
