#Planetary Imaging
1 messages Ā· Page 36 of 1
All i know is that instead of a video he takes loads of pics with one overexposed
Like hundreds of moon pics, with one overexposed
Phone can too
How well would you deem a 12'' thats untracked?
Might be practical with a larger sensor like the IMX585. Never done it with a scope that large though.
FOV is about comparable to the tightest I've done untracked.
Another option I have is a Class Cass 6'' F/12 I could get and put on my HEQ5
thats about 1850 Focal Length
You can always DIY a ServoCat or OnStep system onto the dob if you're inclined to put in the work.
i have no idea how that would even work
I mean i can prolly figure it out with my dad
hi
bad focusing or bad weather
Looks out of focus
@somber stratus escuse me for the ping, does it looks like DRIZZLE3 is doing something here? I'm very undersampled in this shot but the two results seem very similar to me.
resize the small one 300% and see if it changes at 1:1.
I don't see any benefit from drizzle personally.
Meaning I just upsample it 3x?
I also have this comparison, again very similar to me
2 degrees above horizon
kinda was yh
My first image of a star since april. (Vega after sunset)
great colimation
Thatās cool
also new and improved venus
I just realized I have Venus data to edit
nice
also why its elongated is due to it being very low in the sky
@low oar new improved Saturn
old vs new
differnet data btw
Could be a smidge out of focus or a combination with wobbly seeing
Literally perfect colimation
Didnāt say anything about collimation š
What?
Nvm read combination as colimation
Its killing my happines
I'm interested to hear that, as well. Guessing a low light setting.
But isn't a lot of signal from Venus in IR so wouldn't IR Pass make more sense?
The point is to reduce signal in venus.
Its so incredibly bright you have to isolate light
Infrared shows deep clouds/surface
UV is for general clouds
So you could capture some general clouds with a UV/IR cut filter
Fine-tune gain/exp/brightness settings.
Which ... is true pretty much for anything, just with Venus you're working with an object that is brighter than normal.
One of two things:
- You got the settings exactly right and your seeing was fantastic.
- Something else is at play, maybe another piece in the imaging train that you forgot about.
Either way, I hope to be able to capture some details on Venus.
Yes, but it would be INSANELY bright still.
These were the same morning
Uranus C and a C 11 and Uv/Ir cut filter, nothing elese
OOO A C11
How bright was it and how much int
I have no idea lol it was July 8th
my assumption is the exposure to make the background appear black, paired with the fact that you have such a wide aperature and long focal length with a high res camera allows you to get a real-colour image of the clouds
Venus rises when itās still dark anyway
who's is this?
I recognise the processing but can't put a name to it
more time in the slow cooker
Do people just not care if their cooked limb makes the planet look like a watermelon?
Those are the ice water clouds obviously. Itās real detail.
I understand the cooked monochrome images, for ALPO etc.
but otherwise absolutely not
I do, that's why I get frustrated at about 99% of my Mars images
dang seeing clouds with just a uv ir cut is insane
what scope does your friend have
oh thats where the sharp edge came from
Partly yeah
He has a 9.25 and I used a 11
nice
dang
venus will be quite smol
but ill prolly shoot without a barlow
cuz clouds
Yea
i mean i shot mars when it was small
with my mak
and this is with my old zwo 224 mc i have player one 664 now
so i should get... some? detail
Uranus c
Hell yeah, I love my 664
mine has yet to arrive
what scope are you pairing it with?
expect amazing deep sky and planetary with this cam
also if u have questions abt it u can ask me ive used it for half a year already
130PDS and hopefully a C8
oh nice
did you order the one from zwo or player one
dude
i am the Nr. 1 zwo hater
i look down with dissapointment to new people who willingly bought a zwo camera and didnt buy the P1/touptek counterpart
ive saved a few people from the asiair spiral
ZWO makes great equipment but its overpriced and i dont like their closed asiair ecosystem
Great is an overstatement
their cams are average
the red metallic finish is drippy as flip though
the cygnus app on NINA makes advising against it so much easier lol
yes it is
what cygnus app
oh you dont know
AsiAir but for NINA
nah a new one
is it free? yes
can you use it right now? yes
download advanced API plugin and the app on your phone and youre set
Does it work on IOS?
when NINA is open on your laptop, the app recognizes that and builds this connection;
Phone -> Home Wifi -> PC
yes
so basically you can control your rig from your literal BED
provided your PC and phone are on the same network
ive been thinking of buying a touchscreen for my minipc to imitate controlling from a phone or something but this is a gamechanger
this also means you can literally control 99% of your setup from INSIDE the house
can i use the network my remote desktop creates
i dont know lol
ill try\
yes true
NINA is the GOAT
it is
spread the word
whats it called
i dont see anything if i just search cygnus
cygnus astro
is it ios only
nawr its on google play as well iirc
ig my phones too old then
im on android 13
s20+
do you know how to put apps on yo phone using apk files
if so
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hpHNIsWhp_6wkB-OfmWBAh4ZZRiMK_mw/view?pli=1
i dont
real
mars is SUCH a pain
the right one looks like it has a bit more detail to me but the edges are terrible
@rugged knoll is the moonlight gonna effect my Saturn photo?
No
Only the clouds will
Also that wind might make your mount wobbly
yoo
not bad
thanks, need to learn to process better

Hard to when bro is getting detail with uv/ir cut and I cant even get detail with ir passš
What equipment
8" dob, zwo 224mc and celestron xcel lx 3x barlow
However my tracking didnt work and it was 3° above horizion
Okay you cant compare a C11 with a 585 on tracking and good seeing with that lol
im aware lol
theyre not common nor simple to capture afaik
yeah it was on purpose
which moon is that? titan?
@somber stratus any chance you could process this data? just dont crop it at all?
i like this process too
Yeah.
@white yoke
Nice
That's me
Saturn and titan with my seestarš
Stellarium free ahh
Luna from yesterday (20° above horizon)
LMAO
titan shadow transit
i need more data but ended up being ambushed by clouds
Nice though
3? lol
š
Fuckkkkk I wish I got this
Just posted these on Instagram, the transit would have been so much better
The next transit is on my bday
Yeah
Also Tom what do you think about my moon from yesterday? (15° above horizon)
Vey cool line
vs google moon
@somber stratus how do I pick the correct ir filter?
there arent that many different types to pick from
a 685 is bright but you lose out on the ability to treat it output like mono on an osc cam, and its a bit less of seeing benefit
a 850 is dimmer, better seeing, notably worse diffraction, can treat like mono on most oscs
890 is a unique narrowband for some planets, revealing methane
1um is used for venus nightside
Highly dependent on gear and conditions.
I don't. I use mono cameras for my IR stuff
with the exception of Venus NS, but I will be using the Uranus-M for that now too.
Not pointless, just less useful. You're limited to using the longer wavelength filters, IR850 pass and 889/20 CH4 are your only (efficient) options with OSC due to the bayer matrix transparency
see above^
And osc stands for?
one-shot-colour
I see
osc, like the uranus c
hence the -C
lol yea
So I feel like I would want to pick one for just sharper results
Not to enhance planet specifics like clouds and such
your best bet then is an 850
filter should be as close to your camera as it can be, i think
Should I buy a good adc first or a better Barlow first or the correct filter first haha
No I know
Iām not saying order on the image train
Iām saying importance of purchase
lol
Sorry
o
yeah i mean
with filters, adc becomes a bit less important, barlow is probably most important tho depending on your setup
Because rn for my imaging Iāve been just doing native
Or a cheap Barlow
Yea I have a c11
Every time I use the Barlow I get ghosting on Saturn on the right side
is ur barlow out of collimation?
Canāt see it in the live view or in the ser but after I sharpen it pops out and ruins it
I mean Iāve collimated the best I could
On multiple occasions
nah like
did u drop ur barlow
and now its messed up
Shoot idk itās cheap and sometimes I take it apart to clean it š
š¬
....
so yeah your barlow is a wee bit screwed probably
everything needs collimation
yeah
probably
and dont take it apart
Because I know my results are good Iām not saying that but Iāve seen what the c11 can do and I feel like I can do better
Treat barlows like refracs
Haha
Thatās what Iām saying
My potential is there
Itās just I need some puzzle pieces to fit
Whatās like the best Barlow
Thatās not the cost of a new telescope
You donāt need an extremely professional Barlow for it to work
You should just have a functional one
So any 100 USD one should suffice
Doesn't matter for fairly wide bandpasses.
Only CH4 it might make some difference due to wavelength shift on fast systems. Best place it after/behind the barlow in this case.
Well I screw my uv ir cut right on my cam and itās fine
I see a lot of people use one called powermate?
I saw one guy do really well with a Celestron
Most modern barlows that aren't awfully cheap work well. Powermate is just a (usually 4-element) telecentric barlow made by Tele Vue
So itās better?
Also tom you gonna try and catch a titan transit this time around or no?
Itās worth it
Barely. I don't notice much difference.
Ahh I see
I could have gotten the transit this morning but just didnāt wake up š
Maybe I can get a Barlow before the next one
All of them aren't visible here due to a odd 'resonance' between Titan's orbital period and Earth's rotational period. Only one part of Earth gets to see them for an entire season. This equinox it's NA/SA.
Woah shoot dude
I had no clue
Thatās insane
Thatās like actually crazy how that works
Literally not visible anywhere else. I think the 2040 series is better placed for us.
maybe
I donāt understand but itās crazy haha
It's all coincidence. No causal relationship
so we are safe from u specifically in the category of titan transits
Haha
How does that work though that doesnāt make sense
Itās a billion miles away
And a shadow
How is it not visible
Or is it just light out when itās happening or something
Just the orbital period is a multiple of earth days. Just coincidence
like how Jupiter's inner 3 moons have roughly the same position every 7 days.
Oh
15.95d to be exact, but that 0.05 drift is countered by the fact Saturn rises earlier and earlier due to Earth's orbit around the Sun.
I sure I could understand if there was a picture š
Thanks for attempting to explain though
But you got it in 2040
A Solar Eclipse 1 Billion Miles Away! šŖ
This morning on June 2nd I was lucky enough to image Saturn and its largest moon Titan, Titan was casting its shadow on to the surface of the gas giant! šø
I am very happy with this image but it could have been better as when I was packing up i noticed some dew was sitting on the glass of my telesc...
723
This is the best I could do on the last one
Hopefully I get the one on my bday
Shadows are well-placed for me again in 2039. Thank goodness, I'll need it at this rate. 
Yeah, checked it just now. 2039 is also shit for us
then 2054 is good for Asia.
gg
I am so certain the solar system has beef with Europe
Soon ā¢
How often are titan transits
I was awake but i didnt feel like moving anything
UNTIL 2040?ā¦.?
Depending on where you live I guess
But yea
They come in periods
We are in one rn for certain areas
Last one of this stretch is late this year. After that, you'll be waiting until 2039
Only happen near and around Saturnian equinox (~15 years).
Ill be 34
Solar system for ya
You'll be lucky if Neptune does half an orbit during your entire lifetime
Sv183
ćNew Productć
Weāre excited to announce the release of the ASI662MM ā a high-sensitivity monochrome planetary camera with low read noise, no amp glow, and a large full well capacity!
Also launching tomorrow: upgraded versions of DSO cameras ā ASI6200MM/MC Pro to meet the demands of more astrophotographers.
š Available starting tom...
216
New cam coming
āPlanetaryā
dang powermate 2x is expensive
Doesn't have to be Tele Vue to be good.
yup
In my case I just have it as it's one of the few that can reach focus, and it puts me in the correct FL range
Btw the Barlow u recomended has been working great! Thanks
Thats the one i have but mono
tom prob got surface details on neptune
I've gotten them.
Only way I would consider valid is with a time-lapse except possibly in exceptional circumstances. Hard to distinguish from artifacts otherwise.
This was with the EdgeHD 14.
What software do you use to add the time/info?
Oh damn. Yeah I ain't getting shit with the C8 then 
Affinity Photo
Neptune would likely be a little over half the size of that with Rio then.
There a free equivalent or am I fine to keep using Gimp?
GIMP is the free equivalent.
Krita too but think that's geared more towards art than photo manipulation.
Ethan thatās crazy you can see Neptune
With good seeing and a 6 inch and a good 2x Barlow at 1500 focal length total could I detect it?
Easily. It's only mag +8
You can detect it very easily
only issue is actually imaging it
its a blurry circle
How many pixels could I get like could I image it?
The only 2 planets I havenāt imaged are mercury and Neptune
Go figure
My pixel size is 1.45
Microns
At 1500 focal length
Asi715mc
Itās like 2.2 arcseconds wide so
You can use telescopius to figure out how many arcseconds you get per pixel with zat
I have no idea how to do that but
Oh damn
11 pixels wideā¦
Thatās pretty damn small
The only planet I need left is Neptune
Okay. Wth.
hm yeah i can see there are quite a lot of artefacts
timelapse helps
did you use any filters or just color rgb imaging?
Would assume uv/ircut
Right???
Centered on something else?
I think there's a speck or something in the band on the first image ... which happens to be at ... about the center of the image.
kinda sad i cannot get this kind of result
: (
this is what i can get max
Yooo this looks exactly like mine earlier this year, whats your focal length?
native 900mm
but i use 1800mm and dslr camera
and software and use the 5x live view magnification
collected like 5k frames and stack them
whats your framerate?
8ms?
And try going for like 20k frames
This is my test saturn using a cheap 2x on top of an expensive 2x, mimicking a 4x at 3000 FL, my scopes normal focal length is 750
8ms per frame
Clearly the cheap 2x is holding me back, im gonna buy a 4x soon
this is fine
wait 1ms perframe how much it is?
my iso is 3200 and i use 1/80
1/80 its dim already in my telescope haha
i dont use a dslr so idk whar that means
uranus c is good?
YES DUDE THE BEST
if you get one of those you are golden
I canāt afford one
I have an asi715mc
Cheap one
@somber stratus @livid sierra is it worth trying to shoot Jupiter just to shoot it at 27 degrees?
At that angle I believe you are shooting through 2.2 atmospheres, and at 20 degrees it goes to 2.9. If you want to, you should go ahead.
You could also just get rid of the blue channel and replace it with half of the red and green channel. Or mess around with ir imaging
I shoot in RGGB, is there a way to separate the colors?
I think there is on registax rught
However I donāt know how to replace it per say
Yes
Siril
You can separate the channels then use color math to recombine them
Make sure the debayer option is deselect when you select the image, or siril won't recombine the channels and give an error message
In this video I will show you how I use Pixelmath to combine my monochrome images. It shows everything you need to know to get started using pixelmath in Siril.
I will be combining Ha and green data. But this can be done with any data set.
Pixinsight documentation: https://pixinsight.com/doc/legacy/LE/22_pixel_math/pixel_math/pixel_math.html
seperate color?
anytime i do a image i make 2 layers in photoshop
one detail and 1 color
and seperate them
I have no idea haha
Assuming I even find Jupiter tmr morningā¦. Will you do it for me?
finally jupiter is coming back
I mean sorta
Itās in the same situation that Saturn was 2 months ago yk
I cant, sorry. But it's not hard to do. And it's optional so you don't have to
Yea! I can't wait to start imaging it again
And I'll give a try for Uranus too
Although I know it won't be much, I still want to check it off the list of planets I've captured
jupiter top 10 overrated targets
whats an underrated target
Uranus
whats your top 5 underrated targets
Uranus
The Hidden Galaxy (C5)
Tulip Nebula
Cone Nebula
Cat's Eye Nebula
š¤Æ
Yooo! Could someone please derotate my saturn data?
(each image)
(one of the files)
this is my sharpest saturn's pic from DSLR and 80mm diameter telescope
What can i improve to make it better?
Do you have a high quality 2x Barlow?
80mm is so small this is really good for it
I use Barlow already
Bought cheap one
Omni 2x
How much was it?
I donāt know what your price range is but I would get this brand
Experience the Celestron X-Cel LX 2X Barlow Lens, your indispensable companion for astronomical exploration! This optical marvel doubles your eyepiece's magnification, bringing distant celestial marvels closer with unparalleled clarity. Precision-engineered with fully multi-coated optics, it ensures vivid, detailed views. Crafted for seamless st...
These are absolutely insane
They make 3x and 5x version as well
But donāt go above your theoretical max
X-Cel
From a DSLR??
Barlows arent that sensitive
Tbh a 50 buck one should do well enough
Yeahh
Thats really good for a dslr
Woah really? Thank you
Do you happen to know the Focal Length of your scope
Which DSLR do you use?
With your setup you could do a 3x barlow and get something out of it
You can go ahead and look for any local suppliers of a 3x, as long as it isnt terribly cheap it should do a lot for you
To calculate which barlow makes sense to use, use this formula;
( pixel size x seeing value ) / Focal Ratio (Focal Length / Aperture)
Seeing Values are;
Bad Seeing = 5
Good Seeing = 6
Excellent Seeing = 7
Not any in particular.
of course the celestron ones are nice but you can go with off-brand ones like from GSO
Just dont buy any under 20 USD
How to check the seeing value?
Alright thanks
Why canāt you?
Svbony 2x Telecentric is actually pretty good to start
Idk how to derotate
alr
Seeing is by your own judgement
If you can see VERY far, you have excellent seeing.
If its average, then its "good/ok" seeing.
If its bad, like foggy, then its well, bad.
Like Tomās version of good seeing is our version of perfect seeing
You are confusing seeing with transparency.
Zats how i was explained to find out how good seeing is lol
couldnt actually test it yet and didnt have any incentive to
https://youtu.be/-tiIFhNVPT0?si=VepHzb1z5LH_KGCO
https://youtu.be/RavpiN0Axj4?si=ov88fm3pRdpKVjae
This is what is meant when talking about seeing.
Video sample showing poor to very poor seeing conditions.
A video example showing excellent astronomical seeing conditions.
A video example showing very poor astronomical seeing conditions.
Ohh ok ok alright thanks
So much difference
Is it not recommend shooting Planetary with very low in horizon?
It is not
Air is denser and light pollution is worse
I wouldnāt but if there is a cool event like a transit or something go for it
No stopping you
Ah yes "Jupiter"
Light pollution 
Meh, I like the challenge, even without a transit. All of my Saturn images are sub-35°
mostly due to my latitude, so not out of choice unfortunately
Fair
I'll go for it regardless in the early or late stage of an apparition.
Not with Uranus and Neptune.
And never pushed it with Venus but probably should.
Mercury is begging for a revisit after 5 years.
Pluto and Charon need a visit too.

can you even resolve the difference

Charon has been seen with a 14".
It doesn't split off but it's there.
Other stars being elongated 
Would like to give it a shot for six days straight. Hard to doubt if you can see them orbiting.
Light pollution doesn't really matter
The one image I have of Saturn was shot when the sky was bright blue after sun rise lol
right i forgor
with perfect conditions i would believe so
it should have the resolving power to do so
Btw @somber stratus I have a question. So recently I tried planetary for the first time (yeah I know, I have a C8 and i never did planetary with it
) and I got this. Saturn was decently low, I believe 30° or so, and seeing was quite bad. I notice a weird artifact on top, it looks like the planet is "doubled". Could this be the really bad seeing splitting the colours so much that they land on different pixels?
This is luminance
This is not a sharpening or stacking artifact as I can kinda see the same thing in the raw video. I'll send that too in a moment.
what Ethan said
small chance is astigmatism from poor collimation but much more likely a lack of an ADC
Also, are you imaging with a diagonal?
Depends if "horizontal" here is aligned with the horizon as to whether it's dispersion or not.
I can tell from the ring shadow it's mirrored. If so, no need for it unless there's a clearance issue.
Oh nevermind.
Guess who forgot which way the rings are tilted? 
š

Stuck in 2019
stuck in 2024
lol
It's been 12 years. This is a strange new world. 
Yeah, shooting the individual RGB channels helps with that right?
You know how you might accidentally write the previous year for a couple weeks after new year's day? This is me with Saturn right now.
Collimation is fine
Considering the images he gets, the right amount 
Will be less but not gone entirely without an ADC.
Is the zwo one alright?
Gear is worth more than what I've spent on it due to finding good deals, but I've actually spent probably in the ballpark of 12.5k, with a good chunk of that being financed from APY winnings over the years.
Apy?
Astronomy Photographer of the Year
Yearly international competition run by Royal Museums Greenwich in London. They have an exhibition of all the shortlisted images.
You get prize money for 3rd,2nd,1st in each category
I aināt a Londoner
International enteries, it's just the physical exhibition is in London
Ethan has won a fair few prizes over the years too and he's in the states
Woah
In theory, probably.
but you have to be unique. It's not as simple as "take a high res image"
What if I take the clearest pic ever of the moon or something would that do well how does it work
š
I seee lol
click on these green tabs to show all images in each category
I don't even understand the image completely lol
Is there a grand winner?
The orientation was something like this
Yeah. £10k for overall win, and in each category: £1.5k for win, £500 for 2nd, £250 for third.
Hmm then probably not dispersion.
Could be anything really.
Collimation, barlow optics playing up, diagonal (if you used one)..
The barlow could definitely be one of the issues. Another user here had a similar issue and apparently it was internal reflections. Flocking the barlow seems to have helped.
Thanks for the help, I'll try narrowing down the possibilities till I find the cause
Agree to disagree lol
you dont need a terribly expensive one lol
buying a 123 USD one is a wast eof money in my eyes
They need to be properly assembled and use proper optics but thats all
I mean I guess you donāt NEED, but Iāve used a 59$ one and the 123$ one I bought is much much better
In my experience atleast
I guess it depends what defines terribly expensive as well
you still need to watch out what you buy
often times theyre either cheap china shit or just no-brand stuff
like GSO and Omegon are the exact same just for different distributors

zwo makes incredibly mid products for a premium price
and the company just SUCKS
Holy, is there a lot of competition though?
Is someone mad they raised prices because of American tariffs?
Itās hard to know if thatās true or not soully based on 1 person
Fine then, give me the best planetary camera you know of? Iām guessing youāll say Uranus-c or an Ares-c
On another note @somber stratus any advice for how to process lots and lots of images when making a timelaps for planetary rotation? You already gave me the python code to correct field rotation, however my next issue is I feel like Iām not mass processing the images to there full potential, the limiting factor being that you want every image to look similar, tell me what you think please
The best planetary camera?
Based on what?
Price to Performance ratio?
Im not American 
A personal favourite of mine the mars c II, otherwise the asi678mm is very nice too but well, itās zwo
And youāre right the Uranus C is a godtier pick as well
-.- let me get the message
No period
It doesnāt tell me who sent the message, and itās still opinion based if itās 1 person
Iām a single person too so there is no reason for me to think itās great either, however my cheap 199$ camera works wonders for me
Personally
I donāt see 200$ cameras from other companyās doing as well
If so I would have bought that one
I like my tiny ass 1.45 pixels š
Sensor isnāt as popular
Zwo is generally a horrible company which you yourself can check by just researching
If they have cams with sensors you need and no other one has it so be it
I mean I like smaller pixels personally but im not educated on the subject, so itās hard to know what to and what to not buy, especially if you were going to invest a lot of money, half the people say something is good and half the people say itās bad
Mmmm would have to be the Uranus-C due to its insane sensitivity in the proper lines
What
Uranas-c
The Uranus C costs like 360 USD
What?
Where did you get 2k from
Their own website lol
Send me a link rn š
Just go onto player one astronomy
And go to planetary cams
Itās not that hard lolol
The TEC cooled version costs like 550 usd
Is it worth the money for planetary?
Oh itās awesome
Tom uses it
The cooled version is more for DSO
The uncooled does plenty for the price
For planets, itās not worth it.
Got it
Thermal Noise only really is relevant when it comes to DSO
Also the ACS they promote also is not worth it
Not because of planets but because itās generally shit lolol
They promote a fan cooler
Ahh
Active Cooling System
Do you do plantary?
I did a bit with my dslr, rn Iām waiting on my Neptune-664C to arrive
Im well versed in the topic but just lack physical experience
Gotcha
Would you say itās worth the money to buy the ura-C when I already have an asi715mc, for my setup 6 inch reflector 750mm, OR keep saving for my 10 or 12 inch and get one faster? Iām thinking it might be worth getting it now because once I have a bigger scope Iāll want it anyways but lmk?
For purely plants yours should suffice
It is worth the money but you have a totally functional and by no means bad camera at your disposal
The cams are by no means bad but
Just mid for what you pay yk
Theyāre insanely average
Yeah
Of course. Arguably the biggest in the world for AP, they had 6000 entrants this year. There is a similar competition for wildlife photography iirc too
Batch process in Astrosurface
Thatās how I do the timelapses
Fairly simple. Open one of your images, go to wavelets-decon tab and choose the wavelets you want to apply. Then āsave pā for saving the process. Then exit and go to batch>wavelets decon and load up the process/batch of images you want to process there
Thanks, Tom
Was I wrong when I saw the winner was a simple picture of the moon?
Nice dude
Hey man you got ISS?
Wait, there's a python code? Can I have it to try?
Everything China
except the scope
China Products ā Cheap China Shit
Cheap China Shit are those 50 buck junior telescopes
I thought some of you guys think Svbony is conaidered "China shit"
Example of extremly horrible seeingššš» (5Arc/s)
I love Svbonys filters
theyre svbony
theyre okay
Yeah I actually used their UV IR Cut and Telecentric Lens
I tried comparing with my old GSO 2.5x, turns out my Svbony did better job
Is this current Jupiter? It's already high in my place but sadly the tropical weather hit me
Looks a touch out of focus, but still diabolical
If you rack the focuser outwards slightly, you bring the upper atmosphere (i.e jet stream) into focus so the ripples appear more defined.
As long as you don't get the bottom level economy stuff. Looking at the SV105
"What are you imaging?"
"The jet stream. Frickin' Jupiter got in the way."
Wait until they find out that all sensors are the same for P1/ZWO/QHY/Svbony. The manufacturers just add the camera body and RAM buffer.
Firmware as well no?
The Specs are slightly different across companies Iāve noticed
ToupTek has a lower full well than P1
Hm?
Have you captured the ISS yet?
585 sensor š
Awesome dude, how do you know when itās gonna be a bright Passover?
then you just gotta track it
Okay, and how bright should I want it to be?
What?
Tellurium will tell you the magnitude, how bright should I want it
It just needs to be illuminated by the sun
It's going to be around the -1 / -3 range I assume
Your exposure has to be really low
The ISS gets insanely bright
Look at it pass Saturn
Itās still bright and look how dim Saturn is
Crazy
processed image gonna look like one of those round ceiling lamps
It wasnt out of focus. Seeing was just stupid. (It was no joke 55° above horizon)
I tried. U can make out the 2 bands but thats about itš
I agree with Tom that Jupiter is out of focus and the atmosphere is in focus. See the same thing all the time in winter.
Saturn with my. Phone
With 4 mm eye piece
Celestron 80Eq 80/900mm
With infinix note 50 pro
nice
Thatās honestly the best iPhone start I have EVER seen
Likely due to not being collimated well
Multiple possible causes;
Atmospheric Dispersion
Out of Collimation (fixable)
Bad Barlow (fixable)
I personally feel like even with atmospheric dispersion the stacking program wonāt stack really bad frames so I donāt think it would be there, but the rest Iād agree with
Earth Astrophysics is new to me, how was this done?
The satellite broadcasts images every 10 minutes. All you need is a satellite dish, SDR and a computer to receive and decode it.
It almost looks like the same picture but I didnāt get as long video time
But we both have a werid green effect and color shift
Just how long is that focal length is on that scope? It must have a huge apture to have that much small details
I think Iām gonna try Saturn in the morning
Is this worth trying to shoot? Iām getting really bored with ap and want one thing to do
Or what time during sunset can you start to see mars?
Whatās its apparent size? Isnāt it way outta season rn? Iāve been out of the planetary loop for a while.
Honesty have no idea, thatās why Iām asking, I havenāt tried for mars in forever
Itās somewhat close to the sun so probably tiny
Saturn is really the only major one Iād bother with.
Yep, a shame
Or just shoot DSOs like a normal person

Soon to return?
I would say to small for most people
I could capture it, but my dark site is blocked on the direction by trees
i could go venus
but ill prob fail again
Yea I recently got Venus
Saturn in the morning, Venus in the morning and soon Jupiter in the korning
May I see?
Jupiter 23 Jul
Not bad, how high was it?
around 12 deg
lol
sorry I live in asia
yeah it's 22nd
this year
Damn probably then
I think I probably stacked 3-5% of 40k
Gotcha
2 minutes of data or something
Damn
Hmmm ok ok, my Telescope used to be fell of, idk bout that
Thanks haha
You like the pfp?
Lunar eclipse moon š
Haha
That's a 10" scope at 1200mm native. I typically shoot planets at 5400mm.
If I understand correctly the green effect you're talking about is both due to shooting in raw mode without any color correction as well as atmospheric dispersion maybe some CA.
Yes, you need an ir cut filter
Hey, @somber stratus, have even captured a Dione eclipse on Saturn?
On another note, do you ever just go out and look at things visually?
I'm not sure if it's visible due to discord compression
27/9/2024
Had to oversharpen a bit
Oh awesome dude
What scope do you have?
yoo ur malaysian too? also nice image with the 8"
Skywatcher Flextube 200p
Ain't no way I found another malaysian here
Im at equator too haha
What IR filter is the best for fighting bad seeing? And not being too dark?
I was thinking of getting an IR850 or something like this, could also be useful for Venus clouds
It depends on the qe of your sensor
I have imx 664 color, I will also have imx462 mono in the future
685
Will it help with resolving Venus clouds too?
Yeah
I have it and it works awsome
saturn tonight
this morning, my IR data seems useless to make as (L)RGB
Compared to my two nights ago
I wonder how did Jupiter change by now
And did the GRS shrink
Cuz in my months long timelapses it has been slowly shrinking
Someone with a deep archive of Jupiter images should work on that.
Yes it's shrinking
Seeing Venusian surface would be very cool
Probably lots of stuff happening there
Yes
Nice yay
I wonder by what year will grs be gone and will we see new storms like this forming
You can see it tho
Thermal Vision is weird
With 1010nm filter?
I donāt think I can image with it on my makš
Gotta wait for a big dob
Soon ā¢
Wow this is very cool
24 inch dob and iNova PLa-Mx camera
First time hearing abt this camera
Sony ICX618ALA ccd
im thinking of combining w47 and NPZ SZS-22 for venus clouds imaging, is this a good combo? Or should i buy a ZWB2 filter?
Re-edited my Saturn and Jupiter and got a little bit more detailed but only slightly and fixed the colors a little better because the original images were green
You can still see the green with Saturn a little
Both those images were originally captured over a year ago but tonight Iām going to try to get Saturn again but with more video time but itās lower on the horizon so I have no idea how itās gonna turn out
If it's any consolation, iirc Jupiter's red storm is constricting because it's intensifying, and the winds are getting faster. It could deintensify at some point, and the eyewall of the storm would expand again, potentially making the red spot larger.
This does also bring up the potential that the storm dissipates too intensely, and loses all structure entirely, which would be sad to see.
yesterday saturn, phone with 4mm eyepiece and telescope 80eq, seeing was poor
with a phone thats very nice man
Thank youu
I'll be invest on good Barlow lens soon, or maybe buy an astro cam?
Like Uranus C
If you can do only one, Barlow.
Best do both. Though if you're good with the phone you might be able to do some interesting stuff. I was never able to capture anything of decent quality on my phone. I got a couple of shots of Saturn and Jupiter was just a bright ball of light no matter what I did.
I have that
Ok ok
Thank you very much
Wow, thats great
Oh I didnāt know that
Interesting interesting
How did you stack it good?
Iām very bad at stacking
Iām trying to stack a picture of Saturn rn
I use autostakkert to stack it tho
What settings did you use?
But before you do the stacking process, you need pipp to align it, chose Planetary option,(i shot the Saturn with iso 6400 and 1/60 30 fps
Record max 2 Minutes
Import to pipp
Check Planetary option
Then to the processing option
Choose stretch to 50 percent or something
Crop AS you like(444x444) usually will do the job
Then import it AS avi uncompress
Import the avi files to autostakkert
Analayse it
So you want to see the graphs that show, check the RGB align, there are 4 empty, write it 80 50 35 and 20, place ap grid, make sure it's not too small(idk for some cases it creates weird stacks artifact)
Then do the stack, and... see which the best frame you consider. Process it into registax, sharpened it, and your done
That's my workflow, idk about the others, other perhaps will do more professional than me