#is this real…
63 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
It’s pretty long but definitely doable
Just from looking at it you can find all angles and split it up 2 different ways to get triangles -> find areas
@harsh surge
help me find another angle
i got stuck at that exact point 💔
well actually i did more but then realised it was wrong
they are not bro
you can split the kite at the top into 2 triangles i think (the one with corners ECG)
one of the triangles will have angles 54 and 36
ah nvm that still wouldn’t help to get a new angle
ts is never coming up 🥀
bro stfu
none is asking whether it is coming or not
we are asking for help here
here's the solution from the guy who made the question
haven't read the q myself but there ya go
Is that a 5 marker?
no
it is very long to be a 5 marker
it is not even a gcse exam question
I think this works there’s defo a way to simplify this
Cba to think too much about it thou
Actually there may be a problem with the final produced line in the trapezium since it may not hit the vertex in which case you need to repeat with the resultant quadrilateral and so on
Still probably possible but you might have to introduce iteration until 3sf accuracy
What do you need to assume
This has no assumptions I’m pretty sure except from the iteration part which should also be assumption free (just won’t be exact)
Have u done the q
No but where might there be an assumption in the working
Try the q and you’ll see
?
You can’t assume an assumption 🙏
I think the easiest way to see if there is an assumption required is to see if the problem can be reposed with the same set up but have a clearly different area, which I don’t think works because of the perpendicular intersection
the guy who made the q said he didn't know if there was a way to do it without making an assumption
that's written in the first line of his working
genius idea, problem is
the last triangle
you are assuming it would perfectly fit
oh mb
for not reading
Hi how did u find 21 degrees to be the angle
look at next line of working
i showed it
Oh mb I didn’t see there was annotations on the side
icl i thought that solving simultaneous equations were long