#What does part B even mean?
9 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
It’s because in the first part they’re trying to get you to see the correlation between the x value and the gradient at that point
and then you use that to try figure out what the gradient at p would be
by trying to make equations with the points you do know
so when x = 1 then m = 0
and then at x = -1 you’d draw a tangent and find that m = -6
at x = 2 you’d find that m = 2
and you’d try figure out what is the correlation between these values
Is there an equation which allows me to get from the x value to the gradient
x = -1, m = -6
x = 0, m = -2
x = 1, m = 0
x = 2, m = 2
x = 3, m = 6
since when x=0, m = -2, we can deduce that there is a constant of -2 in our equation
since x = 1, m = 0, we can deduce that the coefficient in front of x is probs 2
so now we have gradient = 2x - 2
Now we check to see if this formula works for all the other values, which it does, and therefore it is our answer