#um whats wrong with this?

46 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

raw bay
fervent lotus
#

No more questions hippo.

#

I’ll be over in 5.

#

You can’t take ln like that

#

Not ྀིྀ it works

summer crown
#

the way youve ln'd each term makes me want to tear my hair follicles out

fervent lotus
#

It’s almost as bad as when people would square root(x^2 + 25)

#

And say it’s x + 5

summer crown
#

i slide tackle anyone who does that

raw bay
#

instead of cooking me @summer crown @fervent lotus maybe HELP

languid vine
# raw bay

why do it like this anyway just setup a quadratic

#

multiply the line before your awful ln stuff by e^0.05t youll get a quadratic with e^0.05t and you can say say e^0.05t = y or something

#

then solve

fervent lotus
#

You should know me by now

#

I only help 66% of the time

#

The other 34% I use to hate

raw bay
naive bobcat
raw bay
# raw bay

@prime oracle could you do it? I really like the way u do the working out very clear

prime oracle
#

one seconds

fervent lotus
#

I’ll do it for u

#

@raw bay

#

My 66% of the time help has been fulfilled

#

Please come again next week

prime oracle
# raw bay

It looks like you got rid of the 10 in the first line, then also took the logarithm wrong

#

this is my working (took long bc I decided to do everything) if you want it

raw bay
#

@prime oracle @fervent lotus how did u get 0.01t

prime oracle
#

e^0.1t is (e^0.05t)^2

#

It allows you to create a quadratic equation with the values that you have

raw bay
#

im cofnsued

fervent lotus
#

Think about power rules

#

When two things w the same base multiply

#

What do you do w rhe powers

#

You add them

#

Remmeber

#

It’s basic indicies laws

#

e^0.05t x e^0.05t is e^(0.05t + 0.05t)

#

Which is e^0.1t

raw bay
floral raptor
# raw bay

i would have done it in a different way