#type checker change in 0.27.0 - is this compiler error as intended?
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
0.27 has the correct behaviour, the previous one was the result of a soundness bug in the type system
It had the side effect of making this code type check successfully, but it broke it in other scenarios
Is that because there could be another record with field loc? Something else about records that I miss?