#ICCP-XX Alliance Program

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

quiet cloud
#

Objective:
Include In-App purchases in calculations for rewards for the Alliance Program

Summary:
Currently only ETH revenue is calculated for Alliance Program rewards, but this excludes revenue from one of Illuvium core games. Currently Illuvium Zero revenue comes solely from in-app purchases, but there may be other future titles that take advantage of this.

Overview:
Mobile app stores do take a percentage of the revenue, upwards of 30%. I suggest using 70% of the revenue generated for Alliance Program rewards, but would leave it up to the team to come up with a number between 50% and 70% based on any additional costs that are associated with in-app purchases.

Mobile purchases are made with local currency so at the end of each Alliance Program pay period these local currencies will be converted to ETH. This ETH will be added to direct ETH sales to determine Alliance Program Tier status and rewards.

Rational:
Creators should be incentivized to make content and promote all areas/games of the Illuvium ecosystem and currently there is no incentive for Illuvium ZERO. This will be increasingly more important if there would be a push for free to play gamers to play ZERO.

proud lodge
#

Maybe we could get someone from labs to comment on the feasibility of this. Top of my head, how do we integrate the creator code for izero purchases? Can labs track in-game purchases via username and therefore track who's creator code is currently being used?

Aside from this, my other concern is the net revenue that goes to the dao considering play store or apple store cut

quiet cloud
proud lodge
quiet cloud
plush crown
#

uploading this to github

plush crown
#

ICCP-20
@forest jewel

hearty elbow
# proud lodge Maybe we could get someone from labs to comment on the feasibility of this. Top ...

No added work to be done is a gross overstatement imo

Tracking is different from a fully automated system with all decision points in place

Properly choosing a threshold based on data, predicting dynamics of this in the future, implementation of this process and upkeep, full 100% robust verification of said tracking

We all know these 'laws' are sticky and old laws have given us some recent issues

Not saying we shouldn't do this, but let's paint a full picture. If we do it, I would add a cadence for said process (yearly alongside yearly report or quarterly)

#

@proud lodge @plush crown Please consider these points with your councils before locking the DAO into a law

forest jewel
#

<@&1107754780744487002>

#

<@&814435151307866142>

uncut ridge
left tiger
#

We were both tagged lol 😛

#

Rich tagged all council members

uncut ridge
#

mb

serene forum
plush crown
#

<@&814435151307866142> guys can we please have the rationale for the revision?
thank you

forest jewel
#

@quiet cloud is aware and in the discussion internally

plush crown
#

they had 6 days

#

since the ICC started voting

forest jewel
#

Yeah I think there are other more pressing issues imho

plush crown
#

IMC still can provide the rationale regardless they have voted

forest jewel
#

Ah yeah, I meant more on the revisions

#

themselves

serene forum