#IIP-XX QuestDex and Player-Driven Quest System

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

grave flume
#

Simple Summary:
Introduce a player-driven quest system in the Illuvium Overworld that enables players to create and offer quests to others. This system aims to enhance player interaction and engagement with the Overworld, providing opportunities for investors/collectors to participate without direct gameplay and allowing players access to every Overworld stage and region without paying travel fees. The implementation of this system will require the creation of a marketplace for quests (QuestDex).

Full Proposal:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQDVPzV-gr-VWX9nLDQZGNAVuILC03Baikr1ONb9eZywulJ1sT_H0W_HwYhXC0LSlBbqFdWwuhJ7ZZu/pub

Sponsor: @grave flume

Key Contributors: @slender vault, @worn iron, @supple olive, @vocal tartan, @neon panther, @wet robin, @nova salmon, @rustic bronze

questboard.png
proven owl
#

Who in your mind will create this dex? And why it has to be decentralized?

grave flume
proven owl
#

What Oracle will this use to determine if someone actually acomplished a task to receive their reward?
If Labs is doing this again. What's the point of decentralization?
Does this even need to be on chain?

I think the idea is a great way to do scholarships. But having it onchain can just drag it down in dev time and effort.

grave flume
proven owl
grave flume
rustic bronze
#

Its a good IIP which solves several problems (mobile buyers, whales, access to higher tiers, scholars) while remaining simple to understand - go to board, accept or create a quest. You could flip the idea too - illuvium creates quests, rangers fulfill them, then illuvium puts the resources found into lootboxes buyable on the open market. For the whales who dont want to wait to get their rewards.

upbeat vigil
#

incredible idea I love (I'm going to keep all the fuel and sell nothing! to give them to the player who completes my questdex ^^

void stratus
#

Is quest the best word? Would missions be better?

grave flume
wet robin
#

I'm cool with this as long as it doesn't take priority over the release of the 8 man arena mode, multiplayer in Overworld, or full real time OW combat

rustic bronze
# wet robin I'm cool with this as long as it doesn't take priority over the release of the 8...

How does the passing of an IIP effect scheduling? We probably need a way to indicate that. Like I love this proposal as a solution to illuvials popping out of gatcha but it probably shouldn't get in the way of the tent poles you listed. Is it up to the team how they take on the directive and where it sits in the roadmap?

Some IIPs may be important enough to warrant immediate change, others could get approval and sit in a queue. It's interesting because if you present an idea as filow did, people will encourage you to do an IIP if you feel strongly. Then you do one and it can be struck down by the council because of scheduling issues. Does the gov system handle this nuance?

grave flume
# rustic bronze How does the passing of an IIP effect scheduling? We probably need a way to indi...

Yes, I intentionally omitted any specific dates from the proposal to avoid disrupting the team's schedule. It's simply a topic I think we should start discussing. It will be up to the DAO/team to determine its importance and where it should fit in the work pipeline. Our priority should always be what attracts the largest amount of players into our ecosystem.

Like @wet robin said I also don't want this to delay the implementation of multiplayer in the OW or the Gauntlet Arena mode.