#Save the poor Illuvidex before OB
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I guess they are working hard to solve the issues with illuvidex. Because as you said, it's a core Feature that has to work in Order for pumping revenue streams... Buying/selling assets has to be seamingless
We have been seeing the slowness of illuvidex since the wave 1 started and it hasn't improved since then... i must say that it has degraded in performance compare to last year... its more than a year and still having lots of performance issues. I dont want to keep pointing out previous issues again here but it shows how the illuvidex related matter didn't get proper attention to fix it from the root. I hope team is doing the best to fix it now as we are near to open beta
I can't imagine OB launching without a working illuvidex. I'm sure the team is on this already.
Yah I think so too… but the goal of this post (goalpost) is to get some kind of official statement rather than hope.
Would be nice.
I would rather the team started making fast iterations, then saying a and b 😕 really thought things would be improving at a rapid pace instead of all this; We are aware. we are working on something better now.
I hear yah! The Illuvidex is really the backbone of our future endeavors... I'd think things are well in process to update it. Just looking for something concrete for us peasants XD... anyone? @royal badger @hearty apex @sacred walrus
There is an project in Jira to fix up a number of Illuvidex issues. Its just slightly lower priority than the PB4 stuff. Even though they aren't 'building games' the web team still has qutie a bit to do with PB4 and Open Beta inlcuding Fuel Exchange, Account updates, various ladders and leaderboards, etc, etc.
Cool. Also Kieran just addressed the Illuvidex issues during the town hall... stating that the intention is to have the Illuvidex ready to go for OB.
Yeah they stated in the town hall that they are working on big changes that could be messing with it. Exciting times tho!!!
Why push the illuvidex update through knowing it was broken. Coudn't it have just been left alone on testnet until everything was ready to go live. Still seems an odd move.
Point stands 😅 #1224108943337328700 message
I’m not sure what you’re saying? Did they recently put out an update for the illuvidex and then it messed up?
I believe so. Don't think it can break itself 😅
I mean there's obviously more reasons than an update that could cause it to go down.. please dont be mean to me I can't mentally handle it
Please let me know what other causes there could be, i'm struggling to think of any. It all seems to come back to pushing an update live before testing it thoroughly.
You’re probably right but could it not be AWS, IMX, etc? Again I think you’re right but you don’t have to mean to me and give me attitude lol.
It doesn't look that way to me. Happy to be proven wrong though, makes no odds to me.
You think I am being mean? 😆 . Sorry if it comes across that way. Really don't intend to be.
All good I must have misinterpreted the energy through text 🙏
Try go into your album, find a spot that’s missing an illuvitar and press the buy now button. I don’t think AWS could cause filters to fuck up like that for so long. 😬
Yah... searching, filtering all wacky for a whilke now.
Appreciate this post! 🙂 Don't consider this an official statement but we're tinkering under the IlluviDex hood right now - especially with Filtering (implementing a layer between us and IMX) ultimately to make filtering and analytics smoother and more feature rich. Also supporting all the new collections.
Also have some new features coming to the IlluviDex too, like listing multiple items up for sale at once and a cart to purchase multiple items (even if we are limited to one item per signature due to IMX limitations 😦 )
The Web team is juggling a lot at the moment but the goal is to have these ready for Open Beta - and to polish as we near launch and continue to do so after launch until it's a very smooth seamless experience.
If you encounter specific issues, please provide examples or specific details of your experience. This information is crucial for us to identify and address any problems quickly. I'll jot them down and ensure we get them on the backlog to be fixed.
Hi Kosta, one thing to add to the list of its not on there is the ability to list at a price inclusive of fees.
If you want to lo list slightly under the floor price you have to guess what the ETH or USDC price will be once fees are taken into account.
I’d want the option to list at the gross price and let the system work out the fees and net price
wen trading
that's an IMX limitation not Illuvium
yes thats pretty annoying
Analytics - we've got some designs for improved analytics at a high level (seeing volume, across date/time and also popular items, top items sold) also down to a per item type basis (how a specific item is selling). Hopefully we can get them in for Open Beta, depends on capacity/priorities.
Collection offer & unlisted items offer both IMX limitations unfortunately 😦
