#vercel blob local development
23 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
🔎 This post has been indexed in our web forum and will be seen by search engines so other users can find it outside Discord
🕵️ Your user profile is private by default and won't be visible to users outside Discord, if you want to be visible in the web forum you can add the "Public Profile" role in id:customize
✅ You can mark a message as the answer for your post with Right click -> Apps -> Mark Solution
(if you don't see the option, try refreshing Discord with Ctrl + R)
as they have their own info and things, i think you have to use their servers even for dev 😭
For the future if you’re just using an s3 complaint store
You can always run minio in a docker container locally
To simulate the s3 api locally
Sadly vercel blob has vendor lock in
i was thinking because they used r2, that it can be s3 compatible, but wasn't sure what vercel magic is done
R2 is s3 complaint
yeah that is what i was saying
I misunderstood
i was trying to say that they use something that is s3 comp, but i wasn't sure that vercel passes that on (but i can see how i didn't convey that ;()
Thanks for the responses. Unfortunate that there isn't an easy way to write tests against the vercel API that don't use their hosted services
@balmy notch you could try to mock the functions
yeah. that is an option. I think I will just stick to S3 for now. Looking forward to this tech progressing though.
Ah okay
Hey if you’re using s3 check out next-upload
It’s a package I built as an alternative to vercel blob
It streamlines the upload process without any of the vendor lock in of vercel
All you need is an s3 compatible object store
very cool. will check that out!