Angular example code doubt.

[nova yew]

Note: Msg has been edited to include working link of the code

Code: https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-buyafd?file=src/app/peek-a-boo-parent.component.ts

The code above is from the official angular website.

The line 47, the tick method confuses me.

When I remove it, The following code in the template of the same component

<div> *ngFor = "let msg of hookLog" class = "log"> {{msg}} </div> 

Only displays a single log message.

But when I do not remove it: The above code works correctly and displays all of the required messages in the logs.

**question: **

1. I do not completely understand why the tick function makes the template of the component behave properly (prints out all the logs, instead of just the first message in the log) .

[I have read the definition of the tick() function in the code and also read about the Event loop and how JS queues these things, but still I do not understand this.]

2. My second question would be about the single log that gets printed **when tick() function is removed **. I would like to know what is the mechanism behind the first log, which is the message :

**#1 name is not known at construction**

being printed.
Why did this particular message get chosen to get printed, and not the other ones that are also available in the hookLog?

Thank you.

**Link to documentation where code is present: **
https://angular.io/guide/lifecycle-hooks#lifecycle-example-set

[merry yew]

g!rule3 @nova yew

[sonic arch]

@nova yew, please take a moment to go over our #rules. Do not spam communication channels. Keep messages relevant to the channel they are in. Do not send the same message or question across channels or platforms (ie. StackOverflow). Be patient. Someone will be with you when they have a moment to help.

[nova yew]

@merry yew

Sorry for the repeated message.

I deleted the previous post because it was cluttered with the discussion over the code link, which could deter possible answerers.

Hence I deleted the post and remade it.

Please excuse me for the spam. That was not my intention.