#RF Bug Seeker
weary oxide
long pebble
How does this differ from the built-in frequency analyzer? It doesn't look like it is scanning for any specific protocols, just any kind of noise.
Also I note that it requires a specific firmware that is against the #rules here...
weary oxide
Also I note that it requires a specific firmware that is against the <#755146389...
I think the description in the repository is sufficient. Also, you can compile it according to whichever firmware you prefer; the version I published is just built for a different firmware.
Additionally, it feels a bit strange that everything created and shared in this community is received this way—there seems to be an attitude against productivity and contribution.
In the tools I shared before, they were criticized just because the repository image was generated with AI 😀😀😀
You can use it or not—that’s up to you. I’m not keeping it to myself; I’m sharing it openly. It’s also open to improvement, so you can build on it and add your own ideas. I’ve just made a starting point.
long pebble
My apologies, I'm not trying to tear it down, I was asking what advantage it has over the frequency analyzer as it is not clear to me in the description.
Also, you can compile it according to whichever firmware you prefer; the version I published is just built for a different firmware.
I would recommend making this more clear in the README. It says that specific firmware is required due do dependencies, not that what is provided is built for one over the other.
EDIT: It does build and run on official firmware. I wouldn't have even attempted it with how its worded in the README, that may be worth clarifying in the documentation.