#ark-2
1 messages · Page 30 of 1
I’d also like to hear your thoughts on why it seems it would take that long
I can see it taking 4-5 years for Early-Access.
But 10? Yeah, no.
4-5 years just for early acces?
Wait, no. Just remembered that they can't do 4-5 years.
Microsoft only allows Early-Access games to stay on their platforms for 3-years.
I’d say 2 to be out of early access
We'll see, since it did take ARK-1 the 3 years they allow to get out of it.
What does early acces mean? Is it that the game isnt finished or something?
A fancy term for 'beta'
Betas and early-access are basically the same.
Studios started changing it to 'early-access' since that was a appealing name, compared to 'beta'
Something about cause 'beta' indicates you're playing a unfinished game, while 'early-access' means you're just getting early access to a upcoming game....which....
"Is literally what a fucking beta is."
Is it bad if a game stays a long time on early acces?
Other then your game being removed from the Microsoft store after 3-years? No
Betas are restricted and don’t allow access to everyone. Early access allows everyone who purchases the game to play the game.
"Open-Betas" would like a word with you.
“Open-betas” are temporary testing periods
But is the game guaranteed to have lots of bugs and glitches on early acces or not
So are early-access
Early access is for anyone who purchases the game and is permanent
It’s Ark so more than likely gonna be a few bugs
iirr, if you pre-ordered the MW remake, you got access to the closed-beta, and kept the game.
Yeah. There’s a few studios that seem to be using beta access as a means to sell more preorders
I think they're doing that again with the MW2 remake.
Just like how some studios are using the term 'early-access' as an excuse to manipulate their players. 'cough, cough, every early-access game on steam, cough, cough.'
At the end of the day, they're pretty much one in the same.
Sure there's 'some' differences. But not enough that them to be completely separate.
Early access isn’t just another name for beta though. The biggest difference is when betas end all the time and progress is lost and must be redone upon launch. Early access does not. Early access is usually implemented by smaller studios to provide more funds for the game during the games creation.
I mean they wiped official when ark left early access on a lot of servers
They left some legacy servers up but a majority were wiped
I mean star citizen exists so who fucking knows
I dont mind arkII being in early access as long as it needs to be personally
...as long as its in early access and I can play it during that time
Isn't star citizen made by a very small group of developers though?
still been in development for over a decade while actively taking peoples money
Star Citizen is made by thieves and scam artists lmao
lowkey
Not even lowkey, highkey
Highest of keys
Literally everyone knows it
Like there's still almost next to nothing to show for the amount of money they've pulled in, besides "OOH fancy new ship that costs a couple grand 🤩 time to pull out ye old wallet again and take out a loan and sell the other kidney"
Not really. It definitely slowed down this year, but last year they made tons of progress
Not saying its not a garbage and exploitative system, but it is at least being actively developed
Glad I never put my eggs in that basket, all I'm sayin. Game is not even nearly as good as the next few competitors in the space sim realm
Namely Elite: Dangerous and No Man's Sky
No man's sky and elite dangerous are both cool at first but get boring very quickly
Elite Dangerous has pretty unique pvp. I do like the base building aspect of NMS tho
I've never played star citizen tho so idk about if it's better or not fully but from what I've seen it looks more in depth with mechanics than both of the others.
Man just go play space engineers if ya like the building mechanics lol
Eh i tried it. Not very fun to me, i much prefer nms
Oh wait, have you only played it on Xbox?
Cause the Xbox version is pretty bad in terms of controls and performance
No mans sky got nothing on space engineers
Ark 2 is just Spongebob SquarePants Battle for Bikini Bottom
i hope ark 2 is gonna have dinosaurs
so true
On god
for real, Miettisen herra.
space engineers has no point though there are no goals after you leave to space except building bigger ships and going to other planets (where you wont find anything new) but its a fun sandbox though
Yeah. The only real point is building cool stuff. The PvP is a great time on the right servers though.
Is ARK 2 published yet?
it will be probably released in the first half of 2023
you got that backwards
space engineers not only has ridiculous requirements (my pc can run modded ark for example, but barely vanilla space enginners with minimum graphics, for example), but is also just lame
if it is that would be a win, the game is releasing in early access after all unlike cyberpunk
Will it be anything like preview mode on Ark 1
Nah. Space Engineers building is unmatched. It will fry an unprepared pc though.
Sooo fun but ran equally as bad but those old Xboxs didn't have the power tbh
wym?
meh but if I wanted to build I'd just go play minecraft-
I just BOUGHT ark so wil ark 2 be soon otherwise im fucked
arkII will likely release next year
noooooo\
but dont trust that because wildcard is as terrible with keeping release dates as ark is buggy
its not all bad
everything you learn playing arkI will be relevant in arkII to some degree
Ark will get like 3 delays probably
ok
Comparing Minecraft to space engineers is like comparing my 1 year olds crayon work to the Sistine Chapel.
Crayons taster gooder though???
how expensive do yall gonna think it is??????????
40-60 is my guess
100
thxxx
not really, you missed my point
the only good thing you said about space engineers is "building"... in a space game?
like if I wanted to just build, I'd go play a game where building is one of the primary points of it, like minecraft
You build your space ships
to do what with them?
Custom designs and custom resource pathways
lose them in the next five minutes pvping?
Kill or harvest or even build other ships
You can copy them down and get a bp and rebuild them in a welder put that is custom built
You buil ships or vehicles to do whatever you want
like?
calling space enginners planets, planets, is an insult to actual planets... they are just glorified chunks of rock
That was never the point tho
It’s about custom building space ships and fighting each other
so if space ships is all you can give me
I'd rather just go play no mans sky where I have more than just spaceship simulator
Umm you can build cars and bases to
but why would I want to build a base on an ugly ass planet?
The amount of stuff you can build in space engineers is ridiculous. Cars, trucks, trailers, boats, submarines, I once seen a functioning gundam, tanks, space ships, stations.
or build cars to drive around on ugly ass planets
Statute base
Your just salty about the graphics
not really
You try rendering multiple high definition planets on the same server
That’s why ark maps are separate
Im just saying space engineers really doesnt have much going for it compared to other space games
which makes the stupidly high pc requirements and lack of content even sadder
You sound salty with no creativity
no, you sound salty because you cant handle my objective truth and are calling me salty to cover up your own insecurity

Space Engineers is a game for builders and builders only. If you like interactive gameplay and things like that you’re not gonna be into it.
My insecurity for defending an old game requiring critical planning and thinking
Yeah I’m insecure
^
Im curious how element will play into arkIIs story
I mean, its obviously not gone, being element and all
Why is it obviously not gone?
it would be kind of cool if the bosses of arkII are creatures who became corrupted by element
because that would be physically impossible
element is a hivemind thats kind of everywhere
As far as im aware, WC said no tek on ark2
element is not synonymous with tek
What would it be used for?
tek is simply machines running on element, not element itself
Because Rockwell isn’t actually the main antagonist, element is.
element is more than just fuel or a building component, its alive
K didnt know about that
so the question is less what its for, and more what it will do
Dont know much about lore. In what moment does ark 2 start?
I think it’s gonna take over the Aratai leadership, and corrupt them.
And use them to try and end us and Arat.
we dont exactly know
its a common theory that its left in the dark so the player can either self insert their old survivor from arkI or be just an entirely new person if they never played the original ark
but arkII ends with the genesis ship exploding and the ring (and us) crashing into Arat
you cant leave behind something that is literally everywhere
element doesnt originate from earth, its extraterrestrial
Wow what
yeah
No. Rockwell brought the corruption with him. If the gen 2 ship is on the planet element is as well.
Didnt the gen 2 ship explode?
the lifeboat of the genesis ship blew up in space and likely crashed on arats moon
but the eden ring crashed on arat itself
What is the eden ring
(you see it at the end of the arkII trailer, and bits in the second trailer as well)
Bro have you ever played Ark!?
where the genesis map itself was
💯
genesis 2 map specifically
Is it like a physical thing?
the genesis 1 map was a simulation done in the lifeboat
yes it is
watch the arkII trailer, you see it at the very end.. the part with the terminal, and also the scrap metal ring the pteradons flew off of
the eden ring is still actively functioning to some degree btw
hence why the dinosaurs are on arat and not just dead
So element is a living thing which is everywhere and and it want to corrupt us
we werent actually in the eden ring when it crashed, we were in space in a mek
None to say
element does not necessarily want to corrupt us, no
We don't know if element is ever gonna be corrupted again
Not all element is corrupt
We made element corrupted after a war
where do the titans come in then?
It can be a multitude of things that could cause it to be corrupt
Weapons of war?
Element's reaction
Nope
interesting
It is made by element itself... With some earth biomass
Pollution from the Tek war is what created the corruption. Whether that created the element hivemind or not we don’t know.
so it would be cool if arkII bosses were like, aratian? aratic? titans
We don't know that the "hivemind" is even a thing
Yeah we do
I doubt it made the element hivemind, one would assume that if element even has a hivemind, it would be native with the materials creation
I’m pretty sure some humans are gonna want tek back
Will there be obelisks like in ark 1?
No
well thats if they even know about it
no, arkII is on a planet, not an ark
So how will stransfering work?
if it even will
Citation Needed
All I heard about this "hivemind" is from spartan
you can see it in the behavior of corrupted creatures, no?
Yeah, the original lore writer confirmed it
Nope
That’s corrupted element tho
This too
Behaving for the titans?
Corrupted or not, it is a hivemind
though I do find it curious that stuff like manas and snow owls can coexist with element
Are they two separate hivemeinds then
See Snow Owl dossier on why
The fact that it chose to treat itself like a weapon and wage war on humanity is evidence enough
I mean king titan and Rockwell are considered “hivemind pillars”
it could be whatever causes element to corrupt also causes it to "break away" from its native hivemind, and form its own with similar corrupted element
Because it was treated as a weapon by us first
That’s why tamable element creatures wouldn’t be affected by pillar controls
The element infused creatures have a way to filter out element that we can't really grasp, hence why they aren't corrupted by it like say a spino or rex would
🦖🤬
Very helpful
I wonder if its the element they are bonded with keeping them safe from corrupted element
like, its bonded element acting as like a mini obelisk for the creature
Perhaps, some theories suggest that their strange abilities and the use of those abilities are tied to the way that they filter element, so it wouldn't be too much of a stretch to say that the good element in them protects them in a symbiosis of sorts
yeah
if we do get bosses similar to titans in arat
I want a giant dragon titan boss
would be epic
my thoughts is maybe us crashing into arat and violently changing the planets eco system stirs up a defensive response in the planets "native" element
Magma titan and you have to clog it’s vents to overheat it
which would cause it to form titans similar to what happened on earth
But does arat naturally have eke
No one knows for sure, but there's a note that says the element nodes on them receive signals from the king titan that command them to do things, and lord over their respective habitats. Most likely, the lesser titans are the test bosses for their respective proto-arks
Cus earth didn’t
I used native in quotes for a reason
🤷♂️
its very likely arat has element before we get there
but the planet forming with element? probably not
Yeah, I am very attached to the idea that the Aratai possibly made element, and it sent them back to the stone age like it did to us
its certainly an interesting concept
but then why is arat so healthy?
if arat went through an element apocalypse like earth, wouldnt it also be desolate and ready to make like reach?
Would make sense if the element left afterwards, or their "Genesis Ship/Reseed Protocol" was to catapult it into space
I dont see why element would though
Our last ditch effort worked, why wouldn't theirs?
Earth is healthy again, albeit primitive
And with dinosaurs and such now
"Earth, now with DINOSAURS™️!"
and if arat doesnt have element, why would rockwell want to be heading towards it?
like, didnt he almost have the entire ship taken over by time we managed to blow him up?
He wants living things to
yeah but if thats all he wanted, why not stay on earth
Yeah, he (the element) kinda seemed to want a world teeming with life to corrupt and further his (it's) main goal of taking over the universe
Rockwell picked arat put of all the other planets. It kind of makes sense that arat is the homeplace of element
I dont know about home place
but its likely arat at least has some connection to elements origin
Definitely either home planet/birthplace via Aratai or just another planet that it ravaged and/or landed on
As far as why arat looks healthy, element was actively trying to destroy earth. It would have no reason to actively try to destroy its home
fair point
but I feel like arat being the straight up birthplace of element is too easy
That too, the civilization on Arat hasn't had time to develop weapons out of it and wage war for years on end
after all, we blew up the ship before it got to its final destination
Perhaps element has a similar type of life form as that of homodeus and was trying to eradicate humans before they could challenge them
Arat was the final destination
so Im hesitant to say arat is elements origin
but I could believe it does at least serve a key role in elements creation
Could be
its just too easy to straight up say arat is the origin
Like what? Element sobriety test?
I believe it is a step closer to the origin, if nothing else
hell, the aratai dont even look like they've been exposed to element at all
yeahhh
a step closer
Their biology could naturally include element
That makes me think more that element hasn't been used by the native creatures and species there because they aren't advanced enough, but maybe there is, in fact, a meteor of it that landed there too
Or because they are too stupid to use it
Which is something I never considered in my original theory
but if that was the case, wouldnt they be lowkey super soldiers and not struggling to fight crome dome mcgee over here?
I don't see why they would be any stronger
I'm also convinced that an iq of like 95 would be like a 140 iq to us
the aratai ambushed vindiagos party after all... why bother if they were stronger
They could theoretically learn things such as driving
I dont see why they wouldnt be honestly
Anti tek party
Element doesn't make things stronger

Corrupted dilos are no stronger than normal dilos
Not inherently, anyways
maybe not directly, but it certainly does seem to indirectly improve things it comes into contact with
Corrupt dilos can destroy tek, normal ones cany
yeah but those are also corrupted dilos
the element wouldnt be interested in making its host stronger if that host is just a means to an end
Non-corrupted element, yes
I mean, the extinction tames certainly wouldnt be as good as they are with the element they are bonded with
Also this is literally what I said and you aren't helping, go sober up 😂
Alternatively, astrodelphis eat element and they aren't naturally stronger than anything else
No u didn't say that
I mean, literally space dolphins and space whales
dont think much else needs to be said there
Fair enough, but that may have been by careful experimentation by humans pre-Ark saga, we still don't know how they do those things
and if they are eating element, why would element want to empower those creatures?
... because it's the host
but then they wouldnt be eating element
eating as in actively hunting it
but I doubt element doesnt affect astro creatures at all... they are, after all, quite literally living in space
Ig it comes down to how element corrupts the host, and as Bruce said I need to find a way to get sober
They don't actively hunt it, that's just the taming method. They eat normal meat after tame, and I highly doubt them eating element is more than a game mechanic to tie them behind the resource tbh
fair
They can't even be fed element post-tame
As for them being literal whales in space, that's just sci-fi, baby
maybe its because they are enhanced by element in some way that they become fond of people who feed them element
They're a concept in like 95% of sci-fi space literature
true
I wonder if tek wyverns are connected with elements origins
..maybe astro creatures are too, as they are also kind of everywhere
It's probably like candy to humans, no nutritional value, but we love it
Those are just guardians of the Genesis Ship, they're made by the ship
oh I see
well astro creatures are in every system we visit in gen2 as well
which unless those are also ship made, would mean they are likely as widespread as element
God I hope Astrodelphis make it to Ark 2
That one's a no for me fam
Your opinions are suffering from a 90% validation debuff until you complete a 1 long rest.
well, astrocetus are made by the simulation since they are in the lunar biome
but its possible they were just inspired by astrodelphis
Element being in the space biome at least every once in a while does seem to confirm it isn't unique to Earth's solar system, and the fact that there's astrodelphis in most (if not all) of the systems we travel between during our journey to fight Rockwell seems to hint the same
honestly same, I adore glowy things
It’s also possible they existed and were discovered at some point. Leading them to be added to the simulation
Also the cetus are from space too, they appear during the element dust phase I believe
Their inclusion in the sim is probably just for fun for the ship inhabitants
yeah
which makes me curious if astrodelphis are related to elements origin in some way
maybe astro creatures help spread it or something
oh i see, I honestly never noticed that
Me to. They can scrap the saddles for all I care. I’ll ride bare back.
from the dossier
"The crew saw one of those creatures swimming in the interstellar medium, and named it astrodelphis -- 'space dolphin'.
Someone aboard figured out how to tame and ride them -- guess they must've had a lot of time on their hands."
which would mean they most likely did not come from the ship
Perhaps, would certainly get my goat if they delved deeper into the space creatures (and maybe the remains of the rest of the Genesis ship) with a lunar DLC based on Arat's moon
Obviously far down the line
I'd love a lunar dlc eventually
the lifeboat of the genesis ship blew up in proximity to the moon
so i certainly see it having some value to the story later on down the line
With an actual space suit, not power armor lol
meh
Would be sick if, in the lunar DLC, we can float up to the bits of it that aren't moored in the moon itself
if we do get to the moon, I think it should be through the use of some alien creature, rather than technological methods
so the game can still keep its relative primitive feel without handicapping the story
I don't think the whole game, DLCs and all, should stay primarily primitive forever, per se
I agree
The moon also looks suspiciously like a gas giant though, to me
but it also shouldnt be tek in the way arkI was either
Maybe bits of the Gen ship are just floating in it, and that's the map
that tek is what made element want to destroy earth in the first place, after all
Oh for sure, 100% agree
I think if tek does return further down the line, it should return via biological enhancement
I would be ok with just bits and pieces of tek to come later in the games life.
Like maybe a malfunctioning chest piece from the wreckage that is only capable of short bursts every now and then.
I think it would be cool if the player could bio engineer themselves with element to enhance skills they've gotten in the skill tree
Becoming cyborgs could be neat
I’d so bioengineer myself to be able to throw fireballs
Astrocetus are also in space, and they aren't made by the ship
yeah we been over that
I'd bioengineer myself with mobility
to the surprise of absolutely no one
There is a lot to read lol
A gas giant moon... Yeah that actually can't happen
It's probably just a thick atmosphere
Theorycrafting is a female dog (since that word isn't allowed also the term is in jest don't shoot me)
the moon kind of looked like earths moon in the water reflection seen in the second arkII trailer
True
I am envisioning just an oxygen atmosphere, that they somehow explain away
There is two moons, at least we think they're moons
If earth were to have a constant cloud cover, it would look like that from the moon though
wait really?
woah arats sky at night is going to look so prettyyyy
Giant celestial bodies in orbit around something that isn't a star, that's basically the definition of moons lol
Yeah, I forgot about clouds and atmospheres because I'm tired lol
Well, I meant like the fact that they look bigger than Arat and Arat may be in orbit of them, ya know?
They may be the planet(s)
thats also not physically possible
There was no really good pov for determining that in any of the clips
You can’t just be a human Managarmr
Why not?
Neither is element to our knowledge lol
There is in the Gen 2 ascension
Kind of
because of how planet creation works
It is possible to have a habitable moon in orbit around a planet. Titan in our solar system is a good example of that
I'll have to watch it again

Even the best astrophysicists today can't make a consistent model for how planets form. To a degree it is all speculation
moons happen because they are typically either astroids caught in a planets atmosphere, or a piece of a planet that has been broken off into orbit
but two full on planets cannot form close enough to be in orbit while also orbiting a star, they are simply too big
That's not exactly true. There are cases of binary gas giants in extrasolar systems
Umm I wouldn’t say anything is impossible
Yeh
if anything, arats rotation and orbit would be stalled entirely so it would be tidally locked with its "moon" and it would always be on the side of the moon closest to the systems sun
Hola
I feel like we don’t know enough about the universe or the limits of it to argue for or against either option here.
yeah I know the moon wouldnt be a moon in this scenenrio, Im calling it a moon for convenience

That's actually rare that that happens
I’m pretty sure you can have two or Panera orbiting if the main planet is massive
Panera
My bad
I'd kill for Panera mac and cheese rn
Only certain distances of orbit actually cause 1:1 tidelock
but not close enough to the star that life would be possible
Thanks for that
Depends on the star
Some permeat heat further and stronger than our own
That being said. It’s fiction so we can for sure have 2 planets orbiting each other and a sun, both just chock full of dinosaurs and survivors that can throw fireballs.
😂
Aren’t their two star solar systems
I don’t see how two planets orbiting another can be that crazy then
Okay, I can see it. The other planet definitely looks bigger in the gen2 ascention
Binary, trinary, plenty of types of solar systems
It do tho, don't it?
That is mainly determined by the planet structure itself
Artistic listener app exist
Yeah, but this is entirely different than planets
the difference is that with two stars, the center of mass of the solar system is is between the stars
for a planet to orbit another planet, it would have to be far enough from the stars gravitational pull that the planet isnt affected by it in a significant way, while also not getting pulled into its hosts atmosphere
Sounds like a moon but bigger
and bigger is the key word here
They could orbit each other and the star would pull on the center between them
bigger would mean much further away
Or, like titan...
All the planet needs is a mass large enough to have a decent jeans mass to keep its atmosphere, and to have or be in a strong magnetic field to keep the radiation from frying everything
Earth creates its own, jupiter provides one for titan
but it would be highly improbably to have a planet sized moon while also being in your stars goldilocks zone
But what if the base planet being orbited is massive
Again, this depends more on the planet than anything
then it the planet sized moon would probably fall into the planets atmosphere, or be pulled out of orbit by the stars gravity during one of the planets seasons
No
Im just saying its rather unlikely
There is no well defined habitable zone for planets. Loads of different configurations of planets moons and geological properties can create adequate scenarios for earthlike life
It’s just ridiculous to say the dual planet orbit is impossible
Because we simply don’t know enough to claim 100 percent anything
Again, dual planet systems have been observed. I actually took data down for one of them
anyway, arats moons dont even look bigger than arat
They don't have to. The possibility of such a system, while improbable isn't really much less probable than the earth existing with a single tide locked moon
well unless arat is massive as fuck, I wouldnt call its moons planets any more than pluto is called a planet these days
Well, star-citizen isn't on Xbox.
Im not saying arats moons cant be habitable
The reason pluto isn't called a planet anymore is mostly a political reason and to help elementary education to not have to teach kids about the 27 new planets
Im just saying arats moons arent planets
unless arat is genuinely massive as fuck
Arat 'is' the moon
It's a matter of definition. We call the Moon a moon instead of a planet only because it orbits the earth
that moon definitely does not look bigger than arat
I have also.
The curvature on arats horizon looks more pronounced than the curvature on the other planet
well no
the moon isnt really planet sized either, it would be an astroid if it wasnt orbiting earth
The planet the ship was 'actually' going to was like 5x bigger then Arat.
And they're close enough together that Arat would have to be within the main-planets gravitational pole to not be colliding with the other planet.
The moon is nearly mercury sized
Hard to know measurements when we don't have references to others. But Arat is 100% smaller then the main planet.
And we call mercury a planet
not from what I saw
Bruh
Then you need to rewatch not only the ending, but the fight also
There is no size requirement to be a planet other than hydrostatic equilibrium
We literally 'pass' Arat.
The planet is a lot more smaller then the main one.
The Moon is a moon only because it orbits the earth and not the sun
Yep.
So Arat, if orbiting this other planet. Would be a moon.
Again, it's all semantics. With a different solar system, the planet formation can be totally different
There is nothing fundamentally different from a moon than a planet
Wanna know something funny I discovered?
Sure
yeah fair
but it doesnt look like its orbiting the moon though
If they are the same size, technically they are both planets, and both moons
sure we are closer to arat in the alpha cutscene
but there's no way that the moon the ships lifeboat blew up near is bigger than arat
Sorry, your bullshittery made me crash my Discord
that or your own short mindedness
No need to make it personal
What I was referring to is the actual 'fight'
Once Rockwell reaches phase-2, you see the planets.
We pass Arat, and it's pretty tiny compared to the main planet that the ship is heading towards.
it could be because we were closer to what the ship was headed towards than arat
but in the cutscene, arat most definitely looks bigger
We where kind of skimming the underside of Arat
The ship was going to Arat lol
Arat is what we land on, isn't it
Nope, it passed it in the fight
Yes, but not where the ship officially crashed.
yes
its why the orc people in the arkII trailer are called aratai
Because it was derelict, at that point?
and hell the girl even calls the planet arat in the second trailer
Or the other planet was the actual planet the ship found. 🤷♂️
true, rockwell wouldnt really be focused on navigating it when we are kicking his ass tbf
I mean, in any case the naming system used for arat isn't scientifically accurate, I do remember one is called arat prime right?
No, Arat Prime is the launch station on Earth
I rewatched the fight, and arat still looks bigger tbh
For the Gen ship
What do you mean?
yeah ^
Right
arat prime is the gen2 ships launch sight
so the planet arat was likely named after arat prime
They're properly called 'star-systems'
The name 'solar-system' is the name of our specific 'star-system.'
"Sol" is the name of our sun, which apparently we named our star-system after. Which is why it's called the 'Solar-system'
That's just semantics
though it should be noted Micca (I think thats the girls name anyway) pronounced arat "ah-rot"
AHH!! RAT!
Ask literally anyone, they'll tell you that they refer to other star-systems as solar-systems
Meeka but yeah, it's pronounced weird
Arat that is
but we also call other planet satellites "moons" even though the term moon refers specifically to earths satellite
so meh, science
close enough
After also discovering that our moon has a legit name. I've made it my oath to only refer to her as name.
Cause 'the moon' is so fucking lackluster.
yeah its luna
and earths legit name is terra
Yeah.
Short for 'Lunar' which......also means 'moon'
So, are we on Earth or Terra?
both are technically correct, as Terra is just earth in latin
Ahhh, so it's the good old 'yes' answer
but anyway, yeah "moon" actually refers specifically to earths satellite
other planet moons are called satellites and not moons
yeah
Does anybody know if there is going to be an Abberation-style map in Ark II?
there is no new on ark 2 yet look for it next month on 5th
I’m down for going underground and to the sea as DLC content
I would be down for a total ocean map as a dlc.
I can't wait for ark 2 it's gonna be awesome (I hope)
wildcard have a 100% rate on messing up games and you gonna have to wait 1-2 years until they patch the half of the bugs maybe we are in luck and we can enjoy the ark I engine again xD
its a whole different team building the game on a much better engine and foundation
ark 1 was built with a small team and horrendous code
same as their other game
stop being so negative
give them a chance
im just saying it was a 100% rate hopefully they learned with the history becouse if they dont do it we have to becouse the 100% rate would be there still
first off it is no where near 100%
but like...is a buggy product you play a lot a messed up game? Honest question
they only have 2 games
the 2 game
games they have are built on the same terrible code
which is what makes them so buggy
its beyond fixable
ark 2 has a 90% of success
atlas was literally 4 years early acces but for an price of an tripple a title
atlas was a cash grab
so
Atlas wasn't Wildcard either. Just fyi.
Atlas wasn't developed by Wildcard, but a separate studio that the head of Wildcard went to for a time.
Iirr also, if this article was telling the truth. Atlas was the byproduct of Snail-games (the company that owns Wildcard) to want to make another product like ARK due to how successful it was.
Which if that was true, then the blame goes more towards Snail-Games.
thats the thing why i hate todays games (the most of it) becouse people like you defend these games and companies dont have to care about the product
not what I said but alright. If you're going to rant about ark 1, politely move to #general or #ark-survival-ascended and keep this channel specifically on ark 2.

just sayin that ark 2 isnt being rushed nor has the same code or team
it looks promising
Exactly.
but ark 1 and possibly ark 2 will sell based on players buying it yea?
Is a game messed up if tons of people buy it? Most would consider that a fiscal success
yes
through what criteria would you consider a game "not messed up"?
just for an examble if you buy a car full price and you dont get doors and wheels and you have to wait years to get them is that messed up for you?
like you look on a picture and stats and there are wheels but the wheels are just fcking broken
they are cubes literally
is that normal for you? xD
if the car was one of the best selling cars, and people were reviewing the cars as having no wheels yet were still buying and using them...sounds like a success of some sort or another
there was a historical person in germany was he good in your eyes only becouse he had many followers O.o
try flipping it: what about the perfect car with 10,000 miles per gallon, fantastic acceleration, etc, but it sold once and didn't earn enough money to get produced anymore
is that a perfect product? or is it messed up?
everything useless becouse there are no heels
wheels
like wtf
if the essential doesnt work every extra dont help
if your brain dont work and your heart dont beat your bones can be as tough as they like
I'd argue if the essential doesn't work, people wouldn't buy it
ofc they do becouse they think its working
thats why i say the picture is showing wheels
but there are none
would you spend thousands of hours driving something that doesn't work and then still think it worked?
ark's been out for seven years, and many people play it for hundreds or thousands of hours. We both surely agree it takes less than a couple to notice some pretty big bugs. So why is it being played and recommended so much to others?
Shifter — heute um 03:08 Uhr
ark's been out for seven years what has that to do with "RELEASING" a messed up game
and i said 1-2 year to fix the half of it
so after 7 years it should be mostly fixed
ah I see. I think ark is still insanely broken XD
i sense ark 2 will have similar trouble
As it's been pointed out many times, it'll likely cost more to try to fix ark 1 than a whole new game at this point.
if they do the same stuff again it will be a messed up game in release and maybe they fix it so it is only broken xDDD
ye
sure, but ark 2 is no more safe than ark 1 in many respects to the same scope creep and fast content release schedule that likely complicated ark 1
I fell like they're being more careful, more teams working on it and seeming to take their time as well, not sharing things too early. I don't think it'll be as buggy as ark 1, but I'm not disagreeing with it having bugs.
is there ingame footage of it?
All we have is in the pins.
what would ingame footage prove about bugs
Nothing
no sane dev team will showcase game footage with bugs LOL
did i said "oh i need ingame footage to prove the state of an game release"
you dont have to hope if you just read
Ark1 code base was written in like 7 months by like 4 people. The majority of the rest of the code is added onto that. To fix ark1 would require an entire rework of the whole code base, basically for free because as of right now no one would buy ark all over again. They would expect the rework to be free. It would be a huge drain on the company and would very possibly make it impossible for them to make another game. Hence, ark2 instead of ark:remastered
not the question, but yes that's accurate
Robi is voicing concern that ark 2 will be bug filled like ark 1, which is valid
since we as the ark community strongly prefer content over polish
how many people worked on fallout 76
Not enough apparently
thats a good number
but probably more than for ark 1
so we need quality instead of quantity
*you
YOU need quality instead of quantity. The gaming community very strongly disagrees
yeah becouse the gaming community is not that smart and doesnt question the sht they get to eat
unlike food, a basic human need, games are fully elective entertainment lol
i can choose to just...not buy a game if i want polish and the game fails to deliver
i mean you either a smart fella or a fart smella
I mean alternatively you could just be happy to live in a time when a game like ark is even able to be made
🤝
Please don't ask for personal information
Please don't give personal information either 💀
i mean im just saying i let people that are 40 years old with high blood pressure and a smelly T-shirt in the internet win discussions becouse you cant win against a stone
i suppose you can declare yourself the winner whenever you'd like. I prefer to let the bystanders decide 🙂
ye i dont care about that so
Soo what are we arguing over?
Why does there always have to be a winner in a discussion when you could instead opt for a civil quality discussion 💀
im just saying dont defend your game blind say good and bad things about it becouse a game cant be good or bad its just a view of things
Robi has decided all gamers who buy ark 1 because it has bugs are making a mistake #explainanargumentbadly
This^
I mean, shifter makes a good point. More money is made in quantity over quality. It is a byproduct of the consumerist mentality that a huge percentage of people in modern society have
Thank you 🤝
civil discussion is itself a victory these days is it not?
Robi has decided all gamers who buy ark 1 because it has bugs are making a mistake #explainanargumentbadly what does that mean
A victory that doesn't see to a loser. Its possible to win without it being at another's expense
it's also that people prefer cutting edge products or products they can contribute to (which early access tends to provide) when it comes to gaming
i just want to say that i dont believ in a good ark II release by comparing the history of ark I and the current games
well, you did say that, and people read it 🙂
Within that mentality is also the idea that people somehow deserve or merit better products than they have received or feel that they have received. That's what drives the whole culture at its core lol
and edgte products dont have the price of an tripple A title
well people always want more these days, can't argue with that
not these days all days thats why we have planes
Campaigning for better products doest actually make better products, just more of them
Quality nor quantity is better. A kick ass game could come out but if there's not enough quantity to keep it updated the game will die. But if a game has a corp who doesn't care about the quality of the games releases a game and has a whole section of a company working on it the game will be crap and will die there's a fine balance you need and while ark 1 is buggy at least we don't have a fallout 76 situation
A surplus of bullshit helps nobody
the market determines the amount of "bullshit" is my point lol
Someone gets paid for it
a crap game nobody buys is as dead as a legendary game nobody buys
Then the people willing to pay for it plummet, you'll make something day one but after that, probably not. Unless it's CoD, those people will buy anything 💀
ye you are right i still remember the one game no one buyed in the past man it was good
what a legend
RIP the untold legendary games nobody bought
As long as money and paychecks are a thing, quantity will always trump quality because it is both faster and cheaper to make. That doesn't mean it can't be good also
hmm, there's something to the concept of maximizing quantity and minimizing quality. But if someone can make the same quantity at higher quality and outcompete you, you sell nada
now im actually confused either A all your arguments are stupid to confuse me and say hahaha it was all a parody or B i actually forgot what B wasshifter
Lots of room for improvement in quantity over time, but with quality, if the quality just isn't enough it's probably not gonna get any better than it already is
Tbh though, Ue5 is good enough you can basically spit in the keyboard and make an okay game
LOL
Soo is ark 2 on xbox for 3 years?
Ark was successful mainly as a proof of concept. It showed that people enjoy this type of game and was coded at a time when almost nothing like it existed. Technology has definitely caught up, and I envision huge leaps in quality for ark2. They have had 8 years to think of how to do things better
Yes
so basicly Ark I would be a nearly perfect game if they would fix everything and that would prove that wildcard know what they are doing and would give me hope for Ark II
Welp I'm screwed
Early access will probably be 1 year, followed by a full release and then perpetual lifespan lol
oh yikes, disagree about bug free ark 1 being anywhere near perfect
hold on
ark 1 has hella design flaws lol
Ark 2 will be on Xbox game pass for 3 years atleast and Ark 1 will probably never leave the game pass.
Looks like im switching back to xbox
I am guessing you are a pvp player, because that is basically verbatum pvp you tuber propaganda lol
i turn around for two seconds...pvp propaganda? 😂 hold on
i hate early access becouse companies use this to manipulate wrong informed or not smart people becouse early access is not a to early released tripple a titel
PvP Propaganda in history class today guys
early access triple A (and triple A in general) has fallen off hard over the years
Hit up some battlefield 2042???
indie games are in large part defining the trends in gaming...see rust and ark pioneering the survival pvp gameplay
Just to be clear though, ark is not an AAA game
neither is ark 2 🙂
Well, do we definitively know ARK-2 isn't?
ofc there's garbage indie games, as well as flat out scams. Can't deny it. But it's a net positive
Yes? WC ain't triple A
Only triple a game I've seen "thrive" recently is Destiny 2 but bungie privately owns that now so
True, but it's being helped by Grove-street, which is triple-A if I recall
not rly but i want to play pvp becouse it is a feature in the game and i want the whole exp for this game but like i said i dont enjoy it that much becouse its broken and bad balanced the time you have to invest doesnt make even sence and dont come up with realism and earning thing becouse there is literally a lore for why it is not real and its not earning if you just wait do the exact same thing over and over
I am 90% sure ark2 isn't AAA, I am just hoping Vin diesel being in it doesn't ruin quality for prestige
I would've preferred no Vin Diesel but I mean I won't say anything bad until I get to see it in game
it will be treated like a AAA game becouse it cost 60$
100 bucks take it or leave it
There is no price announced for ark2, and ark1 definitely didn't cost $60
ark 1 EA was around 20 iirc
Ark 1 was like 20 ,30 max for me.
"Studio Wildcard was founded in 2014 with the mission of bringing AAA quality to ambitious indie productions designed for core gamers."
So their motive is to bring AAA quality stuff to an Indie production?
atlas actually was an idea to be an ark dlc and it was 60$
like they would take all your money your hair and blood if they could
As has been stated before, atlas is not wildcard
nobody is taking anything lol, people are BUYING these games
Ark 1 was money well spent
you wait about...six hours or so after release and you can read reviews that tell you about a game before you purchase it
Also, I don't remember Atlas ever being 60$ USD.
Game is still in Early-Access, so I don't even think they 'can' market that high.
basicly greedy companies with an community that only defend and not compare with other games critique mistakes and and praise good things dont get the learning curve
same will be true for ark 2. If someone is a bozo who buys on launch while not being sure, plays the entire two hours of refund period, then cries...idk what to tell them
Currently it is $30, and I don't ever recall seeing it higher
I defend WC when they're being rational and frequently express concern or distaste when they make choices I dislike
I apologize for not being the white knight you dream me to be 😦
I mean, wanting to make a living wage isn't being greedy. But maybe that is just me
After pre-ordering Mass Effect Andromeda, I made a oath to never pre-order or day-one buy a game unless they show enough gameplay to satisfy me, or reviews from non-official sources (fuck IGN)
oh yea IGN kinda fell off lol. They had a good run while it lasted
so how do you like the choice that ark dont get patches and bug fixes
It's a good policy to have lol
Im just happy they haven't abandoned an important part of their history like Respawn did
It does get patches and bug fixes though
I purchased the game in 2015 with the expectation that it was possible to never get another update. That is how I always buy early access titles
People who pre-ordered Battlefield 2042:
2042 isn't terrible now, it just had a bad enough start that it doesn't have people playing
Same with no man's sky
I know they fixed a ton of shit now but my god that launch was ass
Nms is quite frankly amazing
I preordered NMS and refused to refund because I saw mad potential in that game that was muddied by cluelessly horrible marketing lol
internet historian has a great video about that
i love it
I might check it out lol
Yup. It definitely is a huge point to the whole release matters a lot. 2042 is way better now than cods most recent title, but it lacks the playerbase because of a bad launch
Still hate how they have pre-made characters, instead of being able to choose from an actual class
Hopefully ark2 doesn't have the same issue
bad launch can be devastating, but ark 2 should be protected because it has SP and unofficial
I hope not but call me an idiot but regardless I will definitely be buying the game
I have no doubt that it will be amazing, but hopefully it is being delayed enough that the launch will live upt to expectations
official can die and it's not world ending
Me too lol, even if it isn't everything I expect it to be I appreciate wildcards stuff so far to be willing to give it a go
Atleast it's not elder scrolls 6. The expectations and anticipation are so high that its impossible to reach any of that
There will never be another game like oblivion
I don't even know what that is tbh
I'm willing to stick to it and buy it day 1 just because I'm a fan of Wildcards work
I've played Skyrim, not Oblivion but I've watched many videos on it. I doubt we will get anything like it again but I am hopeful
I think the expectations for Bethesda have gotten to high for their own good
i never buyed a game pre release or near release the only time i bought a game on release day was eldenring becouse i played darksouls I II III and it was a good release and well supported
Like ID software games are always hyped but they I don't think they've ever overhyped a game to thr point where they can't live up to expectations
speaking of buggy games people love
So true. But like Ark 2, I'm buying it anyway. I loved Skyrim too much to not atleast try it out.
normaly i wait years and watch yt vids about it time to time to see the state of it
True im definitely buying ark w either way the only thing i don't like so far is 3rd person only
I don't see how you do that man I'd forget the game exists
i mean i love ark and you can love buggy and messed up games
me too but sometimes you get random stuff or hear about it
I'd like the option but I don't mind it that much, I'll try it out for sure
I want Chibi events in Ark 2 🤌🏻
Let us ps players know what it's like to play
Best part of ark hands down no questions asked
i will buy ark II if it is proven that it is not completly broken and playable xD if there are flying megalodons and idk my inv dissapear becouse i tame something or idk i would not touch it
Of course, I will enlighten people if I can. I just wish everyone could play it. And have it cross platform so there's no restrictions on who can play with eachother
and you are entitled to do that 🙂
to do what
Amen
not buy the game if you feel it isn't worth buying
crossplay would be great
The only problem with that would be mods
For Microsoft and Steam
Nope, mod.io is allowing cross-platform mods.
Sony though
They wouldn't allow that
so there are communitys mods and server is ther something combined? i know there is but dead or weird and im just thinking maybe i missed something
Ark2 isn't slated to join Sony though atm anyway.
True
Don't know yet. All known info is in the pins, including mod.io
i mean in ark I
True but like, I want all my friends to be included and it would make for an awesome community experience if everyone in the discord could play with eachother to some degree. I care more about the community than the game itself 💀
Ark 1 has mods via steam workshop. This is about Ark 2.
Welcome lmao
i know
Then make sure to pick a role and use the recruitment channel.
are you doing the same
Not in this channel no.
I don't think ark2 will come to ps honestly if it does it'll be a botched version of it like with fallout new Vegas or minecraft
tbh what are you doing with a PS expecting indie games
not to be rude, but Sony is known for being exclusive both ways
Nah I'm here because I wanted to engage with the community. It's a fun experience
I agree im not a ps fanboy or anything I just don't like xbox controllers if I'm being completely honest
I would be upset, everyone should be included even though Xbox has better controllers 🤫
just plug a PS controller in :p
Does that work?
i cant find the right channel :c
why wouldn't it? Ark 1 should allow it. You just need a USB connector for the PS controller
unsure if wireless works tho, haven't tried that
I don't think ps controllers work with xbox or vice versa
no, but they do on PC
Sony isn't gonna allow a bunch of things they've been alot more open than they have in the past but they're not just gonna suddenly allow mods or official crossplay
My controller on pc gonna be a modded watermelon
I'm to broke for a pc
I'm in a band I don't make any money
Mods on skyrim for ps were so ass 😭
I am looking forward to meeting up with my Microsoft friends again if Ark2 allows for crossplay between it and Steam
🤝 Love to hear it
Agreed
Farming Simulator, Skyrim, Fallout 4, Snowrunner.. all on PS with mods. Mods are not impossible.. Just depends on what the mods are. Console has more restrictions. Scripted mods or branded mods are not allowed, nudity etc..
Sony doesn't allow mods that use custom assets which are 90% of the fun ones
On xbox you can at least get custom weapons, enemies, maps, etc
Snowrunner and Farming simulator have custom assets for console mods. Again. Not impossible. I believe it has something to do with how the devs implement the mods into the game. FS for example tests every mod before they are released. So the mods are officially released by Giants. Not sure if Bethesda does that for their console mods.
Does ps support custom mods for snow runner and farm sim? I know xbox does but ps is alott more strict
I think Snowrunner does. But they can’t have brands like Ford, Chevy etc.. Farm Sim for sure does.
Again limited by brands that aren’t affiliated with Farm sim. But they just relabel the brand name to Lizard.
i might buy ark 2 on PlayStation cause ark was my childhood game that i played all day with friends and i wanna relive that but ill have to wait till early 2023 🥲
Nope. Ark2 will not release on PS at launch.
Have to wait longer for Sony.
I read something today that MS paid to have Ark2 on Gamepass for 15 years?! Is that accurate? And does that imply exclusivity for 15 years?
Phew and that’s why I avoid Twitter. Lol. That seemed a little crazy. Ark 5 should be out by then.
I'd just block whatever source said that and let it disappear, telling those lies 😂😂
3 years for Gamepass, I wish they'd give a rough estimate of cost for Steam and Microsoft (just on console or win10 without gamepass)
well i didnt say it would come out on launch… i just said ill buy it when it does…if it does
Probably easier to delete Twitter lol
You kind of did by saying you'll have to wait until early 2023, the rough release date/assumed release date, but alright if I misread.
i dont think it’ll take three years to release on ps though.. cause ark 1 came out like a few days after its launch
It released on PS a year and a half after it was already out on Microsoft and Steam once it was done with beta.
still
If it's a timed exclusive with Microsoft and Steam, it won't come to PS until that deal is finished.
We just do not know when that will be.
It being on Gamepass for 3 years doesn't mean it's exclusive for 3 years, but at launch we do know that it will be. So at least 3-6 months to a year minimum.
i guess thats not too bad… still gonna buy it
I was just pointing out that your timelines were off, it was not a few days. It was a year and a half, maybe a little less. It definitely won't be a few days. If it even comes to PS, since Ark2 will have access to mods and possibly crossplay.
i thought it was released on ps at the same time pc version was released but i was way off cause it said released on 2017 when i viewed ark on my ps 💀
2015 for Steam, 2015/2016 for Microsoft, 2017 for PS. If Ark 2 follows that, it might be a year.
im still buying it regardless of what anyone says when it arrives
I was just saying lmao. No one said not to buy it.
i just realised i was talking to a moderator
So? I'm just a person, and you weren't breaking any rules or even being disrespectful. We were chatting. You're fine.

I am hoping Ark 2 has an official environment for players to play on, similar to that found in WoW or other MMO's.
Rather than the pointless Anarchy-Sandbox vibe it currently has
I really prefer the environment it has now, where I can demo things that are in my way.
Trees, bushes, rocks, etc.
I like the sandbox, which has already been confirmed, just don't know how much of it is sandbox.
dont press strg and - while you are in discord i made everything weird and i hope that Ark II gets more optional content
I am finding it too hard to explain what I mean, my apologies 😛
It's more I am hoping if they go down the Official server route again, the servers will feel more official and purposeful than they currently are. If there is a character system, it shouldn't be randomly deleted when doing expected activities
Yeah it’s a sandbox. We prefer our anarchy around here
A global save system in the main screen where you can view your characters and what servers ( if there are servers) they're on would be nice.
The thing is
MMOs are overcrowded, there are so many failed MMOs especially from established devs and with existing IP
New World is a flop, Starcraft MMO "Ghost" got cancelled, a lot of failed indie MMOs are some of the examples
What makes ARK successful is the sandbox nature plus paid support for modders
ATLAS is basically ARK but RPG focused sandbox and that is a flop
Yes the sandbox environment is nice, I suppose I just wanted more moderation/support for what they call 'Official' servers.
Like imagine World of Warcraft where the world first kills / hardest raids were completed by cheaters - whether that is PvE content or PvP content...
ie make their Official gamemodes more 'official'
I donut it will work in ARK 2 especially how many things to make in order to make MMOs work that is not compatible with ARK gameplay
The reason WoW works because Warcraft is a RTS game
Complete different from the RPG genre plus they have a well crafted lore within the RTS line that fits so we'll with a RPG
If ARK make Tek War instead for the RPG then sure
But I don't think ARK will work as a MMO in a already crowded genre filled with dead MMOs
It takes 3 Warcrafts and 14 Final Fantasies until they made their MMO happen
They can try to offer us a stable form of gamemode, not an unofficial server that may shutdown random, not official with is riddled with lack of enforcement, not single player which barely works and is clearly designed for a server to host etc
They can have small achievements they actively promote, rather than having to set your own goals entirely...ie 'first to kill this boss, first to collect every dinosaur'.
In the upcoming features the 'character' you play is intended to progress and upgrade a lot. If they have no stable character system (like in Ark 1)...it is pointless
Official will shut down regardless
Nothing lasts forever
There is no longevity when comes to live services
It's all relative though, a game lasting 5 years is different from a few weeks
I mean look at official now, 7 years and still going, made starting to those servers impossible unless you wipe them
The only solution for official replayability, cheating, and duping issues is to make ARKpoc official
After all ARKpoc and Beginners are more popular than standard official because of the wipes
Some form of wipe interval would be good, it encourages people to collectively get back into the game at the same time
There already did
Like I just said, they just make ARKpoc official
Or better yet have yearly Conquest
Yeah :p was trying to say 1 month for a game like Ark can be a bit much, yearly is probably the better way to go
"Maybe if you just read it you would understand 100% rate"
Wildcard isn't a triple A studio, nor has it ever been. Also, what is edgte?
Price has little to no bearing on whether or not a game is made by a AAA studio, tf? You are delusional
I was the original source of this information and it's 3 years. No idea how anyone could have stretched that out to 15 years. 🤣
Objectively wrong

💯
Just like Path of Titans, those aren't actual, entirely community made mods and we both know it. If it has/needs the developers' support and work to implement into the game, it's not a mod, it's just an addon. Think Rag and the other community made maps that became official for Ark 1, it's just like that. Bethesda has a bot screen the mod's files for console to make sure there's no obvious nudity or copyright infringement, with the bot for Playstation (at Sony's behest) being far more strict as to not let anything that is made with external assets or textures make it onto the platform, because Sony is scared of anything referencing games they don't own potentially drawing interest from their players and "killing" their brand lol
Who lied to you about Ghost being an MMO? It was an action-stealth story based game with a potential multiplayer (as in like Halo couch multiplayer) mode, lol
Ark 1 did, it's an MMO...
All caught up, whew
Ark is not an MMO
People seem to define mmo ranging from having multiplayer to having hundreds of people interacting at once, with transfers i think ark is easily an mmo
Give me a tldr
Isn't mmo literally "massive multiplayer online"?
Would you consider Minecraft an mmo? Or Rust?
I tried to find where I read that again. It seems to have disappeared into the void of useless information. 🤷♂️
Yeah
Same here, they totally are MMOs
Anything that can have more than say 50 players on a server at once and has multiple magnitudes of servers is an MMO
Warzone is technically an MMO
Oh god
I disagree. 50 players isn’t massive at all. If it isn’t thousands it’s just multiplayer
Well, here it is, straight from the world wide web: "massively multiplayer online game: any online video game in which a player interacts with a large number of other players." What that number is? I have no idea. But I'd say it's around 50 as most casual multiplayer games hardly ever break 50
Another definition:
"What determines an MMO?
A massively multiplayer online game (MMOG or more commonly MMO) is an online video game with a large numbers of players, often hundreds or thousands, on the same server. MMOs usually feature a huge, persistent open world, although there are games that differ."
massively multiplayer online game (MMOG or more commonly MMO) is an online video game with a large numbers of players, often hundreds or thousands, on the same server.
Also from the World Wide Web
Yeah, I saw it too lol
Is Ark not played in a persistent world?
An, dare I say, open world?
With less than 100 players yes
Transfers
More often than not with less than 20
Often ≠ the rule
“On the same server”
Just because it's "often" with hundreds or more doesn't mean it has to be
That's just semantics
So is this entire debate
Look we have 2 people who agree and one person who doesnt so we win lol
No. Google “is Ark an mmo” the community agrees with me lol
Anyway i think it is you dont i dont really care good night
That's where I come in just to disagree
Game. Set and match.
Not Ark 2 lol
Night pumpkin
Neverwinter Nights, one of the first and most important MMOs (to the genre) had a server limit of 50 when it first released
Sleep tight
But I digress
No need to get fancy
(Ark can have servers of up to 200, depending on provider, btw 😉 )
On steam?
Yes
I’ll die on this hill pikmin
Bruh
You will die
That shits gotta be laggy as hell
Die wrong
Imagine trying to find a base spot
Ong
Sounds like fun
Just tribe warring over base spots
Highest pop server I've been on off of official was 120 pop on a wipe
Literally every cave had like 3 tribes in it fighting constantly
Those can be fun
There wouldn’t even be any room for Dino’s to spawn lol
Oh trust me they still spawn
I'm usually the guy infecting everyone with swamp fever and mega rabies on those types of servers, just so fun to do
They stop caring if you're in render or not after a while
Log in and a pack of troodons spawned next to your bed
Like how dinos spawn in ur spam still if you spam off a map
I hope Ark 2 addresses that
I hate when I walk off a nice large cliff and shit still spawns in it
By making it so u can't spam or so they don't spawn at all?
Wild spawns
If there’s one thing I can’t stand it’s a bronto that just stomps around my base causing a ruckus while I’m trying to work just refusing to piss off.
Build a better fence, hoser
And then the new guy whistles attack and every line you have just goes ape shit and has to be setup all over again
U don't set up ignore group whistles?
I do now
Used to not have too cause everyone knew what buttons not to press when they’re not using group whistles
I don't because I'm solo, no new guys to have do that
If ur in a tribe with me and a stalker picks me off my tame idc what u say I'm whistling my tame on that mf
Now anyone new I play with the first thing I tell them is to take J of their gd keyboard
The amount of people I've killed doing that is hilarious
The pains of playing the game solo
Also is easier at times cause you don't gotta deal with peoples stupid shit
“Tribelog: Your level 377 gigantosaurus was killed by Pegomastix”
“Bro I swear he wasn’t on passive when I went into the cave”
Pegos in a cave?
I don't think wild dinos even aggro onto Gigas except for like rex's and yuts and other stuff that size
It was an exaggerated example of peoples stupid shit. Not something to take seriously
Anyways, I was more thinking of the stupid shit like leaving stuff on breed. Asking questions with obvious answers.
Building useless stuff
My tribe had a Spanish tribe blue tagged on gen 2 release and oh god those people were so stupid
I saw one try to shoot a Tek turret with a mek for like 20 minutes straight
💯
Ark OFFICIAL is an MMO. The official network connects hundreds to thousands of people
Old MMO servers for some games could only hold 50 or so people but the transfer between them that connects hundreds-thousands is what made them an MMO
I'd beg to differ (if only slightly), before transferring between servers was a thing even the 50 player server games were considered MMOs
Citation: Neverwinter Nights
Couldn't transfer characters until a bit after release iirc, once the characters became savable client side
Oof that is asking for abuse right there
See: New World
