#Sharply Squad
1 messages · Page 9 of 1
Just AI expand it 1mm
Whatever you want honestly
cimimom
As long as the image can be consistent
im im lazy ill just do something in my garden
if not lazy ill use my car
or cinnamoroll thats a good idea yeah
no the hello kitty guy in my pfp 😭
Lmao, okay maybe keep it somewhat serious
if you want a pastry i can make it happen
Typical subjects
Waterbottle
A couple landscapes, someone should do a portrait with a model, someone should put a fake bird on a branch
its gonna be rough getting something visible well at 15mm and 400mm 😭
Water bottle is a classic
Doesn’t have to be lol
15mm not suitable for all subjects
so just keep everything same distance?
Yes
sensor distance i presume
easy enough
just gotta get my tripod and find something/multiple things to use as a subject
and hope it isnt raining...
How tf 40 mm from Nikon is smaller than 40 mm from TT?!
because focal lengths are never perfectly correct
something like a 300mm will be 295mm or something in actual focal length
but like saying 295mm is annoying
also same with apertures
they arent accurant unless its T stops iirc
Oh, okay
Open ef lens tab 🔥 🔥 🔥
we already pretty much knew this but cameradecision.com is defintely just using maufacturer images
just nice to see someone else doing this
working on a cool modern UI/UX for this
still adding some stuff like an overlay, and support for sensor sizes
stuff got delivered today
should be able to get a basic test done tonight
yeah first time probably somethign will go wrong
dont take it too seriously lol
only thing i can think of rn is make sure your longest minimum focus distance is not too close to the item
yeah i have a 5m hallway i plan to test in
u want the raws or just for me to export joegs
Looks pretty nice I look forward to the further refinement
just make sure it's edited nice
send here before doing any steps that take a lot of time
added crop overlay
any particular apertures?
idk i was thinking
maybe just like always f/11
or f/9
too much DOF might add another layer and make this confusing
this is pretty sick tho
16, 20, 24, 28, 35, 40, 50, 65, 85, 105, 135, 200, 300, 400
fuck 28 and 40
about to drop in new pano tool
this is what i got for now
is that picture actually 16mm?
absolutely not
you should find one that's actually 16mm
I'll find you a CC0 16mm photo
shawn is taking
or anyone can
just going to use actual photos at each length rather than cropping bs
one big thing people ignore in focal length comparisons is compression
cater is, isn't he?
it should be one scene, at different focal lengths
ok well, fuck me
yup
instead of one photo, at different focal lengths
so you shoot the same scene at [11, 13, ]16, 17, 20, 24, 28, 35, 50, 70, 85, 105, 135, 200
the difference of 17 to 20 is very dramatic, and 24 to 28 is also very dramatic
i mean we can add more if people have them i guess
sharply sponsors my fullframe superzoom? 
I have a friend I'm meeting up with who has the Sigma 16-300 for APS-C
insane
so I can do 24-450 of the same scene
need me one of these
how are you doing size comparisons @errant fox
only correct sizes right now are camera bodies on compare page and collection
just using width spec to do maths
do you have the camera size comparison page up?
yes
no
just normal compare page
but the size for cameras is accurate
first step is to get top view of cameras added, then a place to collect normal top views of lenses without the front element showing
so how are you comparing them size-by-side
idk what you're asking really
if camera A has width of 1000mm, and camera 2 has width of 2000mm that means camera A is 50% smaller so we scale the image by 50% width wise
height is untouched
z6iii leads to this https://8v5lpkd4bi.ufs.sh/f/mJwI0W8NBfTnoRN6VfxSEWlyU2Xqj5mRrZ1KfVDiTsNFHcYw
link me that page
seems you have something going on with your bucket integration @errant fox
all the photos are gone, you only have static cached files
yeah fuck me, i had this issue on local and i thought it was just an issue with that
i fix
what the fuck bro
i copy the URL for the image directly from uploadthing dashboard and it's still 404
upload thing outage FML
nice
@proven glade fixed
if this happens again the fix is gonna be a different storage provider
this actually doesnt look very accurate
but it gets it roughly correct for extreme cases
have an opacity overlap mode
inspo: https://www.carsized.com/en/
how they dont have a jetta
clearly not the most comprehensive car database
it might just be called another thing
oh have to type brand first
best UX
why make user type 1 query when you can make them type 3

focal length page will be shareable by URL
/focal-length-reference?scene=landscape-1&lf=50&rf=50&ls=full-frame&rs=canon-aps-c
3d size comparisons would be cool u should make a detailed 3d model for every camera
i was literlaly just thinking about that

feels so shit making this when there;s like 20 sites that do it
and theyre all equally good
and they do the same exact thing
i should just buy one of those and add it to sharply
true
If I may offer my 2c I think you should just make sure the compare images are relatively accurate as best you can considering the constraints. Then just make a basic shape overlay comparison for the dimensions put into the specs. Expand upon it in the future to support 3d/our product images etc
Just create a basic framework with shape overlays, colored blocks for now
idk i feel colored boxes will get Sharply roasted
its not that hard to just get top images
maybe would be okay if we already had like 90% coverage then the last 10% can be boxes
i'm mostly just annoyed at how popular and useful that feature is
@versed fjord ok development > main is now blocked by you getting those images done ❤️
about a bajillion times more work than a simple frontfacing photo
Pretty much
do we even care to have 2 columns or should it just be a single image
you could do the wider angle on the bottom and the tighter angle overlayed on the top to show how zoomed it is or smth
Think it would be useful to have an overlayed box on the wider one showing the crop?
which is exactly what i fucking said
I think its harder to differentiate when its two columns
sorry my chat was way up
lmao
try it out and see how you feel
once its out
for me the line overlayed on one image isn't visually useful
2 columns is nice
just have both
on the bottom you can do the overlapping lines
also can we not do scroll wheel, it makes it way too hard to use, one person's one line of scrolling doesn't equal the next person's one line of scrolling
up-down buttons would be nicer for incremental measurements, and the buttons would indicate what focal length you're going to
There’s a select box at the top
it's live at https://www.sharplyphoto.com/focal-length-reference
the images are just placeholders rn
i was in the process of setting this up this morning and realised i missed work by like 20 mins 💀
ill try get something you you tonight
what was the focal lengths you wanted again?
just so i can screenshot to remember
16, 24, 35, 50, 85, 135, 200, 400 is fine for now but feel free to add others
top view is coming!
lol
literally
I don’t mind the process. It’s kinda fun trying to hunt down a usable photo. The photoshop part takes ten seconds
What's a "top" view for lenses
Cuz technically they're already top view
head on front element
Yeah there isn’t one, I need to disable for lenses
Actually
It should be the view with no front element
So we can use for size comparison
Just do what we can find
Wonder if Bozeman camera would let me take photos of products
Remember that this is a crowdsourcing project and not being assigned to you lol
You can just not do it
ya just saying in general
(I’m going to do it)
assuming we use the same image specs for top view?
1000px long edge and stuff
Yes
@errant fox how to add top view
- front view
- back view
- top view
- leftside ports view
- rightside view
- bottom view
and 7. an isometric view, but most camera photos from this angle are trimetric
Panasonic has a forward-heavy trimetric that they've standardized for all their cameras
Canon's angle is very similar, and their website already has everything in PNG and transparent background
Canon's website gaps Panasonic unfortunately lol
you have Canon, all their photos don't even have backgrounds
Atp just make a 3d view like bhphoto
enter Panasonic 
Only modern canon does that
Like 2017 onwards
Anything older than that is a complete mystery
half my cameras don't even have photos bigger than 300px
Please tell me you're not putting those up
no, I find the high res ones

What is this thing 
yes
Oh while youre there can you check if sony qx1 has been added
I see


I am resisting the urge to absolutely go nuts on Sony mirrorless
I SHOULD FINISH CANON FIRST
resist
who uploaded the Sony a7IV pic
this has got to be the most oversharpened picture on the website
Does adding images put you on the contributor list
@errant fox
I’ll do this in a bit just wait before adding more if you care
@proven glade
yes
sorry dealing with database migration bullshit
will add contributions for images soon
🖼️ New Gear Visuals
• Added top view images for supported gear (top view for cameras, view without front element for lenses, this will be used for size comparison tool down the line)
• Added RAW sample images to gear items, admins can upload them and users can view and download them
🔁 Smarter Gear Discovery
• New gear alternatives section to help you compare and find similar options, editor + roles can adjust this. We should use this to show which gear items are the direct competitors to each other IE. Z6iii and R6 Mark III
📝 Reviews & Contributions
• Reviews on gear pages now support pagination, making longer discussions easier to browse
• Adding images to a gear item now counts as a contribution, giving proper credit for your work
📅 Date & Display Fixes
• Gear cards now fall back to the announced date when a release date is not available, fixing confusing or empty date displays
@jagged epoch @proven glade image contributions coming
building now
sharply on wearOS when
sorry about the comparison delay but as the uk does it rained nonstop from sunrise to sunset
so we try tomorrow 😭
all good
I wish I knew more web stuff to help
I’ll tinker with it when I can. Probably not until Monday. I have to figure out wtf your read me means cause it’s all moon speak to me
well, luckily it's all step by step and you can just ask
web environment stuff is a fucking bitch though no joke so if you can get it working you can do anything
especially if you just focus on small/easy adjustments
all this stuff is live
Your readme doesn't actually setup a working environment, you need a few api keys that isn't mentioned
details ples
I'll have to look at my CLI history
im pretty sure everything required is actually required
Also because of how env is setup ypi can't generate a salt cause at the end of the file you reset the salt which is p funny
salt?
ok one sec
sorry ghost ping
anyway dev, i pushed fixes, you can pull and the instructions will work
payload secret is required but i said it wasnt
and resend secret key was required, i made it optional
Any notes on how to do the raw sample pics?
Or can they be anything
As long as it’s a properly exposed photo of a very generic subject no problems
Ideally natural light
Ya know, just minimal effort
Street/travel/macro
Just intentionally boring daytime outdoor photos
I guess they should be taken on sharp lenses
Oh, there goes my 10-22 
static payload secret?
yeah everything you need to add to run this at first is just stuff you generate on your own
except the auth stuff
@errant fox alternatives tab is displaying duplicate brand name
I forgot how goofy r5c looked 
also, 2 things:
- disable the ability to select the same item (for example selecting r5 as alternative to r5)
- remove the ability to select different gear types for alternatives (lenses for cameras, etc.)
took some comparison images
may not be the greatest because lighting changed a bit with clouds and 200-400 is enormous so cant guarantee its perfect
just need more time
takes a few months for search engiens to really start rolling for a new site
this and the other thing are fixed btw
Fire
think i was half of that ngl
Fine with me
@frosty plaza just so you know, you put "Dual Axis Tilt" for Z50ii display type but it's "Fully Articulated"
Dual axis tilt is like what sony and Z9 and Z8 have
what would a9iii class as?
or is there an option for both
uh wow i was not aware of this
i'll add an option
not sure what to call it though lmao
yeaaa its an odd one 😭
DPR just has it as "fully articulated" but that's kinda not true
The a9 III gets the flexible tilt-and-hinge cradle we previously saw on the a7R V
dpreview said
i keep seeing "flexible"
no idea what that really means though lol
seems no one has coined a name for it
I've always called it tilty flippy
ah perfect
its stupid because everyone calls different stuff the same 😭
id probably just allow you to choose articulated and tilting at the same time on the specs
Four-Axis Tilt-Flip
then pana calls it tilt and free angle
so basically just call it whatever the fuck you want 😭
oops
i guess you can have cables plugged in while using the screen?
not really a surprising thing 😭
4 Axis Tilt/Articulated perhaps
ok but what are we calling the Pentax mechanism
we can call it "some bullshit"
Pentax K-1 Flex-Tilt Screen movement, as well as strength testing the screen by picking up the camera with lens attached and lifting the camera. Visit https://www.ephotozine.com/article/pentax-k-1-hands-on-preview-28884 for more information.
infinite axis tilt
that the fuck is the purpose of that
why would i want my screen to be slightly crooked
this is going in "other" because its cursed tech
ngl theres only like one guy who would add pentax anyway so we get to then when it comes 😭
they put lights behind the LCD so you can illuminate your buttons at night
bcs they didn't figure out backlit buttons ig
pentax doing thing the long way
bro
delete this thing
theyre just doing things different for the sake of doing it different
pentax moment
SINCE WHEN PENTAX HAVE THAT COOKED LCD??
finding top down photos without lenses is... fun.
yeah sadge
for the Z6iii i photoshopped out the lens
i can't recommend this very much though was kinda a pain
might be the only option for some
I tried to do that with the x2dii but it created such a nasty edge because I can only find low-res versions
I didn't really try very hard tbf
For newer stuff it's easy enough
Older stuff...yeah
even newer stuff
@errant fox for lenses, if the normal pic is already the "top" view, do I have to upload the same pic in top view?
For those odd cases where there isn't an angled lens pic
hmm
yes please
Alr
in case we ever find/take a better one for the main
and makes it easier for me to make size comparison
I've also been redoing some of the newer canon ones
Getting higher res pics
Apparently for some items, if you push the width to max, you get a more detailed pic
Not always
Canon needs to standardize their white balance tho 
fr
In other news, I've started doing the specs for a few missing Z lenses
Nikon website funny
16k now

only 14k to go for first place advion
i do
need a higher res of that version
just send me full res of either one ill do it
oh above is the one
ok one sec
what's the name of this body
Hasselblad X2D II 100C
ok fixed
what did you fix
white border
ah I didn't even notice originally
Just make 3d view like some bh items atp 😭
ah yes the easy 3d view
3d scan the 3d scanner
it knows what it looks like because it knows what it doesnt look like
im 3rd
crazy
i might do some on tuesday if i can be arsed
just busy
not a problem but like........
nikon wtf man 😭
or is this some tech thing someone explain to me
Assuming you guys added all the Nikon Z lenses, only 6 more of those have no images
I'll finish up tomorrow and add top views to the rest
Specs aren't done for all lenses yet
im pretty sure all added yeah
I'm so glad nikon keeps every press release ever
Makes it easy to find release dates
yo
also there's no way this price is accurate right?
@jagged epoch
https://www.nikonusa.com/p/nikkor-z-dx-18-140mm-f35-63-vr/20104/overview
https://www.nikonusa.com/p/nikkor-z-24mm-f18-s/20080/overview
https://www.nikonusa.com/p/nikkor-z-28-400mm-f4-8-vr/20125/overview (added but wrong image)
https://www.nikonusa.com/p/nikkor-z-35mm-f14/20126/overview
these are missing, ill add them
Yeah I didn't do these(yet)
Today I did mostly wide and normal lenses
Also didn't do this
Or this
ik
Are you gonna do top view pics for all or do I get more unpaid labour 🔥
i do images here and there where important
but if im spending time its mostly coding
i need to improve the comparison page
Rn there's no way to actually go to each gear page is there
ill prob help with Z lens images some time today though
I don't remember but it was weird
I'm not working anymore today
Just do however much you want, I'll go through every single one of them tomorrow anyway
ok all z lenses added and fixed any mount/focal length issues
Not even F5.6 🥱 🥱 🥱
you'll never be able to afford it anyway
With how good the € is doing I might have a shot in 5-6 years 🤞 🥹
Canon has rf 800 5.6 
how much does that weigh again
Nikon has 800 5.6 too
the RF 800 5.6 is mid it's not sharp enough to justify the price
Yes get rf 800 f11 instead
@jagged epoch @errant fox just stumbled across the holy grail of L mount lenses randomly https://lesdeuxpiedsdehors.com/en/lenses-for-l-mount/#lenses-mount-l-full-frame
with data that looks like this
just sitting waiting to be mined and put on a csv
thats insane
and this website has all the different mounts
some of the notable/better known M mount lenses (there is a shit shit ton) https://lesdeuxpiedsdehors.com/en/leica-m-mount-lenses-list/
this might be 15-20% of the M mount lenses available
a good chunk of K mount
fuckin ez
insane
have we found someone who cares enough to add any sony lenses
or are they still neglected
nah fuck sony
so true
Sony users too busy living life to its fullest to enter numbers on a spreadsheet all day 😔
too busy taking photos of cars
Damn I haven't had a good laugh like that in a while
ive seen some cheaper than this lol
crazy prices on it sometimes
Sigma added
Panasonic/Lumix added
7 Artisans added
Lensbaby bullshit added
TTArtisan added
passsed 1000 🔥
ok i added all things from that list except some niche brands i have to add
i unfortunately could not import the specs also easily so
Hooray
ok i added like 200 L mount lenses
get to work
here's the list, and some basic specs
Gyatt
noice
admin/editor actions are now floating at the bottom
no problem
nice my muscle memory is gone 🔥
where sensor view smh
doing
https://alikgriffin.com/sony-fe-lenses-the-ultimate-list/
https://alikgriffin.com/every-sony-e-mount-aps-c-lens-you-can-buy/
bet u could scrape this
looks like its only a couple months out of date
can’t believe we’re getting pentax k-x before a substantial amount of sony
has this info for each lens
useful thanks
i can look later
cant believe these guys did all this unpaid labor for sharply without even knowing it 🔥
lol
jk jk
i also created the KX on accident which is an SLR
coming 2084
No problem hah
You know why?
Even Pentax K-x is better than any Sony
look at that 40mm lens tho I want it
i mean considering the flange is like 12 inches it's not really a useful pancake
kinda looks like it pokes into t he body too lol
I kinda do too
can i put on Z?
I dont see why not
adapter would be fat though
nah im doing Zr for street
@gusty yoke sorry i created on the test database not the real one, link will work now if it didn't before
It worked
But it didn't showed in a gear database
Only I can't see ,,AF Area Modes" possible thiniges?
Oke
I think the good/bad section is loud
Isn't that the point?
It's the final easy to read gist of the specs/review/verdict etc
I understand, but I feel it's a little out of place for how relatively minimalist and drab the design language has been so far
Yeah I agree
I think the site needs more color in general I don't understand
here let me edit up an idea
I want to revisit it again but I’m not really sure how
Color is fine but this specific treatment is just too much compared to the rest of the site
Maybe colored bullets only or something
Or just changing the structure/content of that section entirely is also on the table
I was thinking this
or full color text is fine too
helps break away from the header being white
A-B showcase
color's good
i dont like any of it tbh
wdym
well
now you'll have to go think real deep and hard about design language
it's hard to deliver a lot of information without delivering a lot of information, you'll have to rely on cues
unless you want to go with tooltips, which I don't think is anywhere to be found in this design language
I don't like boxes
here's what I would've done
well I would've written it in a different way, but drop half the text, remove half the boxes
leaves you with this
mfw Z6iii isn't on your wishlist
should be on everyone's wishlist
wait that's just my screenshot lol
dev db 🥀
wat
@frosty plaza bro is the #1 z6 hater
yes
well, better bulk edit based on slug
or teach me how I can through the powers I have and I'll do it
i prob make a script that goes through the whole lens db and sets focal length based on name
just remember the funky hasselblad naming, XCD 2,8-4/35-100E
yeah ideally you disregard/manually review the possibility of a 4mm
ah fk
leica lenses also do this i think
thinking of making a presets/recipes catalog for sharply
fuji sims, nikon profiles, lightroom presets
canon and sony and kiss ass
yea
i like the idea of having a really cohesive set of these
well made, not a lot of overlap between them
and hopefully the same options for each system
Maybee more things at post builder etc. too?
Oh yeah, that will be soo gooood
I mena
It's important to
Nvm lol
BTW, how many members are there?
37
(you can import picture controls on nikon with SD card confirmed)
only the Zf and Z6iii support this right now right?
Racism 🔥
Anyways, I fixed the focal lengths for the RF VR lenses too
@versed fjord you're gonna need to get fl samples up to 3.8mm, thanks

rent the rfs 3.9mm for us thanks
no.
No
do we have samyang shit on sharply yet
Go add every samyang lens ever
You unemployed thing
i cant add
I forgot to add Samyang brand I think
I think my D750 has something like that too, but I may be wrong
They all have picture controls but only some support the new imaging cloud
Idk if the recipes are specific to the cloud or not
def adding this
Why did nikon upload 10mp files for their press release on 24-70ii 💀
Rip
No like that's huge
5000px × 2000px 💀
thats my goat
@errant fox what happens if you upload a pic with side more than 1000px
I'm curious
WHAT THE FUCK
They uploaded 24mp pic for 28-135 f4 pz 💀 💀
You will hurt my feelings and make the image load real slow
Also if you do that for every image it will cost me money every month
~~ oh fire ~~
what if i want to hurt your feelings and make the image load real slow and cost you money every month
what then
Blacklist speedrun
First sharply ban 🔥
🔥
Anyways I'm going around redoing every single Z lens image because I have trust issues 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥
most of them are fine
Why lol
It’s not that important, much more important to add images for things without it
I had done the 24-70 ii again yesterday and you're just redoing what I had already done
Yeah that too
Someone do 12-24, I can't find a top view
Like every single Sony lens 
advion sent a top down of 14-24
meant to paste it into my browser not discord

also if I wanted to share what I had deleted I would have Mr. Third Party Client
Why the fuck does the official nikonusa pic for 35 1.8 top view have holes in it 
I'm not uploading ts
@errant fox do this one
skill issue
You do it then 
Yeah remove white bg and select alpha
What the fuck is gimp doing

uh huh

I don't have discord open
?
Sharply more important than laundry so you do it
On my pc discord isn't open
what does that have to do with anything
i have a solution for you
You pay for my photoshop
i already closed PS and deleted the image from my computer
I uttered a racial slur
Anyways you do it, I'm going to bed
Could somebody deny my contribute to Leica APO-Summicron-SL 50 f/2 ASPH? I fcked up the version of that thingie
skill issue
The whole thing? Or is just one field the problem?
Does anyone have any ideas for comparisons?
I want to do something fresh and better than other sites, but i'm empty on ideas
have adapters, that's for one
and I'm talking about all possible combination
I want to compare the size of an EF adapted lens on L
and people should be able to compare E mount adapted lens on Z
well that's my three cents on size comparison
good start
React error #185 https://react.dev/errors/185
select an item
idk im thikning how to do it
average the product's color, make it a button, if it's matte make it a matte color, if it's metallic give it a sheen, when you hit the button it shows you that camera in that color
hmmm cool idea
have it anchored to a corner of the image container
when you submit photos you can choose from the colors already available, if no colors are available you make a new one
ofc there would be the default "gray" which is every camera ever
when you implement it, all the current images would be default, if they aren't default we'll change it
I would do this one like this, for example
yeah could do that
could make a dual color selector when uploading color images
could also submit a color swatch icon alongside the camera photo
well most cameras that do have color variants have more than one other variant
i mean dual swatches for the stacked colors thing like this
so a dropdown of pre-existing colors, if doesn't already exist, create a new variant with the name
yeah something like that
then you would have a default overlay for leatherette/metallic/matte
nah fk that
no, I mean you select the color of the leather, and select that it's a leather, and the swatch would indicate that the color shown is leatherette, if that makes sense
so the top would be a metallic, and bottom would be a leather
otherwise it would look like this
i'm fine with that
it's gonna be a tiny circle anyway
people won't even be able to see any detail
can add like a gradient to metallics or something maybe
yeah that's what I mean
and some dithering/halftoning is a good enough effect for leather
this is a lot of work for like 10 cameras that have colorways 💀
I was thinking overlaying this
crackle.png
or overlaying the svg that makes leather grooves is fine, let me find one
detail won't even show
Good luck with Pentax bodies 
how are you going to know this camera has a hammertoning
going to be a nightmare to find these color variant photos
good luck pentax guys
Uhmm, what's hammertoning?
as you can see on the top metal plate
it's a finish/texturing on paints and metallics
i accidentally rejected the other 50mm too
Ohh, okay
That's too
K-50
K-r have a lot of colors too
And special versions for Japan market
Ohhh yeah
It's like 120 ,,normal" coloristic versions for K-r
- that special colours
pentax is different, we'll just have this picture instead of 120 different variants 
more than 120 variants on the same body...
They done same thing to lens bruh
I don't believe that somebody made that not-on-high
different lens colors is fire tho wish more companies did that
Yaa
@errant fox, what if Pentax KX can do continuos drive only with accesory? Check it true or false?
hmmm i remember seeing this while planning the analog specs
let me check
do false for that
just leave empty
$15 is crazy
Yup
"photography is expensive"
I couldn't find the original price bruh
yeah that's tough
Some of the reviewers bought that for smth around 10$
uh oh
Weird how nikon z 16-50 silver is a completely separate item
true
working on better search/filter tool
Feel like R5C should be next to R5ii and not r50v
more analog stuff when
i am not
send a list of things you want added
square will probably add all the canon shit eventually and i'll work on the specs
but for now, just my shit i guess
cameras:
AE-1 (FD)
AE-1 Program (FD)
Canonet G-III 17 (fixed lens)
EOS 500N /Rebel G/Kiss (EF)
EOS 500/Rebel XS/Kiss (EF)
FD cameras also support FL and nFD lenses
IF lenses are also possible:
FL 55mm f/1.2
New FD 28mm f/2.8
New FD 50mm f/1.8
New FD 100mm f/2.8
New FD 200mm f/4
send a list with full OEM names as listed on the product page🙏
im just wondering if sharply supports film stuff yet
ah
it does
"Analog Camera" gear type is available
this is such an ugly reskin of the a6000
Camera is checked but lenses showing cuz they’re typed wrong lol
LETSG OOOOOO
fix white balance on the Canon photos @jagged epoch
Bro I have no idea what wb they use
imo you should be able to sort by release date, sort by rating
categorize by market segment (consumer, prosumer, professional)
hit auto
Does gimp have that
Ok I go home and fix
@errant fox archiving services retrieve the image and they get it back as a jpeg with a black background
What is an example of an archiving service
archive.md, waybackmachine
Hm
uploadthing serves the content as jpeg when you request it
how are you loading the image that it appears transparent to the user but black when you download it
No clue
vibecoded too hard
<img alt="Sony a7 V" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-nimg="fill" class="pointer-events-none object-contain transition-opacity group-hover:opacity-50" style="position: absolute; height: 100%; width: 100%; inset: 0px; color: transparent;" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 85vw, 560px" srcset="/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2F8v5lpkd4bi.ufs.sh%2Ff%2FmJwI0W8NBfTnHeOJu7rrhAFzEMGx89UK4c1Qwlby0CP6YnIa&w=640&q=75 640w, /_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2F8v5lpkd4bi.ufs.sh%2Ff%2FmJwI0W8NBfTnHeOJu7rrhAFzEMGx89UK4c1Qwlby0CP6YnIa&w=750&q=75 750w, /_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2F8v5lpkd4bi.ufs.sh%2Ff%2FmJwI0W8NBfTnHeOJu7rrhAFzEMGx89UK4c1Qwlby0CP6YnIa&w=828&q=75 828w, /_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2F8v5lpkd4bi.ufs.sh%2Ff%2FmJwI0W8NBfTnHeOJu7rrhAFzEMGx89UK4c1Qwlby0CP6YnIa&w=1080&q=75 1080w, /_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2F8v5lpkd4bi.ufs.sh%2Ff%2FmJwI0W8NBfTnHeOJu7rrhAFzEMGx89UK4c1Qwlby0CP6YnIa&w=1200&q=75 1200w, /_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2F8v5lpkd4bi.ufs.sh%2Ff%2FmJwI0W8NBfTnHeOJu7rrhAFzEMGx89UK4c1Qwlby0CP6YnIa&w=1920&q=75 1920w, /_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2F8v5lpkd4bi.ufs.sh%2Ff%2FmJwI0W8NBfTnHeOJu7rrhAFzEMGx89UK4c1Qwlby0CP6YnIa&w=2048&q=75 2048w, /_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2F8v5lpkd4bi.ufs.sh%2Ff%2FmJwI0W8NBfTnHeOJu7rrhAFzEMGx89UK4c1Qwlby0CP6YnIa&w=3840&q=75 3840w" src="/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2F8v5lpkd4bi.ufs.sh%2Ff%2FmJwI0W8NBfTnHeOJu7rrhAFzEMGx89UK4c1Qwlby0CP6YnIa&w=3840&q=75">
It’s literally just a transparent webp over a gray background
it's within this tag
Color is transparent so idk
does uploadthing respond to request headers and serve pretranscoded content?
from uploadthing
Yeah but where are you looking at the site
I see you also don't understand it
i see when its downloaded its a jpg now yeah
i think i don't care
must be uploadthing behavior
okay I think I understand it
when you specify &q=75 it doesn't pull the webp at 75% quality
it reencodes the webp at jpeg 75% quality
try these two for example
so you want to change how the react object encodes the url
ok yeah it shouldnt be doing that ill change
your server is serving the webp somehow
that's the interesting part, idk how you're serving webp when you're also pulling the jpeg for the user
some funky cache behavior
its just probably uploadthing behavior somehow
yeah but when you go to it it becomes a jpeg, uploadthing weird
also are you optimizing the page for webcrawlers?
archive.today receives a non-stylized version for some reason
this is above my pay grade
does archive just not run js
are you loading css with js?
lmfao
your site shouldn't rely on javascript to load html and css
idk exactly how nextjs handles css
this is every site
btw
no one is using static html anymore
its just tailwind
afaik it compiles to plain css at build time
@proven glade wayback machine renders it fine
archive.today is trash
Ooof
BTW, I got an idea for comparinsions
You are choosing first camera, then you are checking what do you want to compare from specifications (like release date, mpix, max fps etc.) and then site is comparising random second camera with the same specs that you checked
For example: I'm choosing Pentax K-r and I want to compare it to random body that have 12mpix too
yeah i was thinking this
instead of having to add 2 things then click compare, just click "compare this item" then immediately choose the second
oh wait i see what you're saying
ok good idea ill think about it
Manually? I mean both will be chosen by user?
i understand now
Yeah, I understand you here, but what's your idea?
currently you click "add to compare" then have to go to another item and click "add to compare" then click the compare button
it would be better to just chagne the button to "compare this item" and then immediately a box pops up to pick the other item
Ohh, I understand now
Aaand I have a next idea, but not for comparisions
Add a carousel instagram post maker
Oh, mb
I was thinking about stacking the horizontal photos to make it vertical
Smth like that
Ohhh, okay
fwiw I've never seen archive.today fail on anything other than sharply
Day 2 of asking for Canon M2 photo @jagged epoch




