#Sharply Squad
1 messages Β· Page 8 of 1
This should be standard for all manufacturers at the very least.
Iβll never understand why companies make things difficult
i love the datasheets
theyre so good
leica does them im pretty sure
for the export thing ive done it at 2000x2000, 300ppi and png π«©
mb
ill do some tonight
could be worse
@errant fox are other camera stores (e.g. park cameras) fine or no
ok
many websites do use the press release assets though, so if you can no longer find the press release, you usually can find same images on product pages, or other websites using them
but you have to be sure it's the same image
its usually pretty clear since the manufacturers take all of their photos in similar ways
ok
also uh how tf do you export something in .webp from PS
save as
if ur not gonna crop and resize just don't bother exporign as webp lol
either send how you found it or do the full process
sorry thats literally as wide as it is
unless you want it some form of other aspect ratio??
huh
did you read the thing lol
Processing Images
- Import into Photoshop
- Remove background if there is one, make sure edges are clean, no white or black left. Do this before sizing the image down.
- Select > Subject
- Select > Modify > Contract > 1px (check "apply effect at image bounds")
- Make sure to remove any holes for straps or in small details
- If it's a lens and not facing left (front element toward left) rotate into that orientation
- Crop tightly on all edges (aspect ratio does not matter)
- If image is larger than 1000px wide, do Image > Image Size > Select "Pixels" for Width > Type 1000px for pixel value leaving resolution at 72 and resampling automatic
- Export as .webp (File > Save As or Save a Copy > Format = webp)
- Select 75% quality, do not include any metadata or extras
yes i did???
well either you didn't read it or you skipped the steps on purpose π
which is also fine
but don't bother importing to photoshop and exporting webp since someone else will just have to do it anyway
π
im aware
If image is larger than 1000px wide, do Image > Image Size > Select "Pixels" for Width > Type 1000px for pixel value leaving resolution at 72 and resampling automatic
i already did it
either read the instructions for creating images, or just send the original
don't bother to do half of it
just wasting your own time
sending image with the name of the item is just as helpful
yes cropped is correct
that's better yes
nah gotta be exact
ah
it's important for size comparisons
i mean if its like 1-2 pixels it doesnt matter
because the strap things are already skewing the scale a bit
should be that now
this was 75% quality?
from photoshop right?
hm ok
that's good then
choose with your heart
if there's a "default" then that one, otherwise it doesnt matter
we will add color variations later
ah
where do accessories like FTZ fall on the roadmap?
yeah fix that
white border on top and bottom
i literally contracted it as said so probably lighting
now maybe or is it still
THAT is an adobe skill issue
whys it so ass quality (from the tamron website)
did you contract selection
I always do 2 just because
fair
My workflow is just load it, auto select subject, contract 2, selection layer mask, crop to selection, resize, save copy
where did you find fuji images?
lets try again
i went onto the eshop, opened image in new tab so its max resolution they uploaded it as
then took it there
could just be ass quality ig
oh hello
advanced tip here
if you inspect the page
and find the image url
you can usually find parameters in the URL like width = 700 height = 700
oh
wouldnt it be uploaded in 72dpi so it would look like shit even if it was small anyway
this was &fit=bounds&height=700&width=700&canvas=700:700 before
no the actual images are much larger but they use a cdn to serve smaller version to the web
ah
right
heres a g2 (i think its quite shit because whoever at tamron took the photo clearly didnt check focus, theres ones that are higher quality from amazon tho)
and an m11 mono (should be fine??)
a7iv
π π π
My dude can you pick a brand and just do that 
Or if you're as unemployed as me, go do the specs for the Canon bodies
Youβre not his boss
i just went through the list of the gear section
and did the ones i could that werent filled in already
where did you find this one? it looks different
canons website
photoshop
literallt clicking the layer then remove background
lol
brother
tried to install a scripting language, accidentally installed a game for bass players
nevermind, what is this shit
@errant fox are we allowed to use pics from the Internet Archive

I haven't yet but just wanna know
what is "the internet archive"
u mean the wayback thing?
it's just the same rules
if you find some manufacturer press asset in there it's fair game
brother just use photoshop or gimp or something π
loser mentality
my next bet would've been darktable-cli

bro was considering touching darktable
but wait does it resize them?
it trims them yeah
massive white border
color floodfill background removal,
edge blankspace trim
for i in *.jpg; set f "$(basename $i .jpg)" ; magick $i -format jpg -bordercolor white -border 1x1 -alpha set -channel RGBA -fuzz 20% -fill none -draw "color 0,0 floodfill" -shave 1x1 -trim
+repage -sharpen 0x1.0 -define webp:quality=75 $f.webp; end```
the
that was the old version
it's 1084 pixels
that was using this
diod -resize 1000x, now it's 1000 width
unless you want 1000x1000?
where did you get the og pic
panasonic
I can't find a very high res one
just take off 2 px bro
square u know the whole point of the site is for the public to populate the specs
square is like "i am the public"
people said I should be more outgoing
going out and filling sharply specs
I would add every 85mm lens but im too employed
employment worst disease
the second I become employed sharply will become a barren desert
bangkok
what do you want to do
what kind
mechanical or electrical
yeah gonna be jobless for a second
mechanical is the cool one do that one
yeah all very good ideas
needs multiple pics if the camera/lens is sold in multiple colors
also that
sample images probably highest prio, not sure how to source them though
select people, public submissions with approvals, etc.
Loan every camera in existence
do we care about sample jpg for cameras?
or just raws?
sample jpg more important for lenses right?
It depends, how does the site process and display raw files?
floh can we duplicate specs for s5ii and s5iix
sample jpgs are nice for default profile color stuff
it won't
purley for purposes of downloading and viewing yourself
Oh hmm
like yesterday i was looking for raw files from X100VI or X-E5
could not find them
ended up finding 1 on some random forum because a guy dropped a google drive link
can you copy s5iix data and copy it to s5ii @errant fox
I'll mend what needs to be changed
also did you allow the video specs to exceed 200
will do in a sec
most of what changes between S5II and S5IIX are video related
so actually so far with no video codecs added nothing is different
but since the video mode manager does not differentiate between LongGOP and All-I or codecs per video modes, I don't think people would know how the S5II and S5IIX differ
s5iix is $200 cheaper
What is that s5ii pic bro π
Stop fueling my unemployment...
Like, around April/May or so, production will decline because I have to get my tests and uni apps ready
But after that we ball π₯ π₯ π₯
Sharply is the newest and most comprehensive photography gear database and review platform featuring expert reviews, real specs, and side-by-side comparisons in a modern, minimalist interface.
the longgop/all i thing could just be written with the h.264/h.265 codecs or in the footnotes
i did that for a camera cant remember which (prob a fuji)
@proven glade any chance you know roughly how many you needed over 200?
I guesstimate not more than 350
350-400 rows for one camera could really get out of hand fast π
hopefully there's very few cameras that need that many
i'm raising limit to 500, at this point it's just a security thing to prevent data sabatoge
photo not coming through on the x hmm
i didnt add photo
but the s5ii came instantly
cached
also did a cache reset
cached on server
sucks
skill issue
thumb works
i'll be pushing the video thing and panorama for instsagram builder in a sec
dont start video specs yet lol
yeah the list/browse page itself is cached
@proven glade video modes increased to 500, refresh and good to go
horizontal not vertical?
yes
so do I just flip it
mount facing what way
yes
is it supposed to be scaled like this
unforatunately yes
there's just not really a simple way to make lens scaling make sense
maybe will try one day
floh doesnt wanna make everything to scale bcs this actually isnt the most comprehensive photography gear database
so true bestie
whats with the random.... you know what I'm talking about
Use mount size 
we dont know how many pixels the mount is in the image
Count by hand individually for each lens π₯ π₯ π₯ π₯ π₯ π₯ π₯ π₯
Nah but fr, maybe use the lens diameter values
cant reproduce this
give @jagged epoch a GUI to manually scale every lens
yeah it's possible, just hard
floh
Is web design ever easy π₯ π₯ π₯
yeah i've had some ideas for brand allegiance stuff, want to plan it out fully
yeah deal with it
mpb unfortunately uses fucking garbage affiliate service
might just turn it off
Yes please have 1 redirect instead of 2

I go sleep
Canon bodies will be done tomorrow or Thursday
@proven glade panorama coming soon
nice
@errant fox hi when you approve the Z 28mm f/2.8 can you copy over all the data to the SE variant except and the weight/size and the screenshot below
i really have no way of doing so
just have to type everything
just open in a new tab, that's what i did last time
fish supremacy
i cant believe how large this thing is
this one looks kinda shit
thought so
it was the one from the sony website so
hm
fish is pretty ass
not being able to bash script is one pretty ass feature
and in exchange you don't even get that good for a cli experience
I used to be zsh all the way but people around me insisted on using fish so I had to adapt
u can
right?
wdym
Update coming soon
πΌοΈ Instagram Post Builder Upgrades
The Instagram Post Builder now supports panorama / multi-slide posts.
You can create frames that span across multiple slides, making it much easier to design wide images that flow naturally when swiping on Instagram. Exporting now correctly slices and numbers slides so everything posts cleanly.
π₯ Trending & New Gear Badges
β’ Gear items can now show a Trending badge across browse and brand pages
β’ Newly released gear now displays a New badge, making fresh releases easier to spot
π
More Accurate Release Info
Gear pages now handle release date precision better, so dates are displayed more accurately when only a month or year is known.
π€ Profile Page Improvements
Empty and personalized states on profile pages have been cleaned up, making profiles feel clearer and more intentional whether youβre just getting started or already have content.
π οΈ Small Improvements
β’ Reordered MSRP fields for clearer spec layout
β’ General cleanup and polish across related pages
sharply photo forum when
planning to add questions and answers to gear maybe?
forum better?
idk just thinking of ways to drive engagement
whats the incentive to sign up?
/rant
Right now just contributing specs and reviews, and collection is a big one as we have seen first hand. Iβm not really super worried about sign ups, more just being the first place people go to look up specs and information on gear.
DPReview will be hard to beat, but hopefully eventually if we can pull off things like sample photos, lens charts, RAW samples, and a solid amount of editorial reviews, it could be a no-brainer. Their advantage is time and legacy, amount of handwritten reviews, lots of good samples. But Iβm still maintaining that the value of hand-written reviews is highly, highly inflated in the photography community. Iβve read them maybe like 2β3 times ever; usually Iβm just fishing around for a specific spec or answer to a specific question or samples on them, which is much more easily done with a structure like Sharply has.
At the end of the day, no one actually gives a fuck what Ken Rockwell or the DPReview writers have to say about the gear; they just want the specs and samples and easily available information about detailed specs and niche questions. It just so happens these sites are the only ones that have these things, but not in the best structure.
you should add something to profiles so we can upload bag layout pics
if sharply had camera bag support and all the pictures were to scale you could drag and drop lenses into your camera bag on your profile
holy crap
id like to see this implemented by 7am
what about a way to share bag layout pics tho
eh
i dont see the vision
mediocre bag pics not very sexy
plus collection is already there
58mm filter thread vro
also collection page lookin a bit funky, i think someone mentioned it before me tho
oh that's a big collection

He owns like 2% of it rn
Sold most of it
π₯ π₯ π₯ π« π« π« π«
nah this is after i sold
Me when I lie
i took 70d off
Show current
and this isnt including my film shit 
i sell to fund 16-35 f4 in summer
FIRE
Why do you still keep 60d vro
first canon
sentimental value typa shit
i still have 2 btw
π
should i transplant the good focusing screen from the newer 60d to my old first 60d π₯
the old one has a scratch on focusing screen
No cuz you don't use either of them anyway π₯
no fish does not support the same syntaxing
for example, you can't export A=B, you set A B
Wsp was just taking a look at sharply seems like a cool idea I'd love to help out if I can @errant fox
Go for it! Itβs open to anyone to add specs
If you need an item added or have an idea just ping me
still trending lets goo
has no one managed to get a picture of a PF 85 1.4?
@errant fox what if image smaller than 1000 long edge
just dont downscale it
as long as its like 800 or more it's good
what about upscale?
no
no, like, bilinear upscaling
1000 is just a safety net
now at 1000x669 (nice)
any way to fix this with ur script
No one gonna notice bro π
though I've noticed other things, like this
most cams do its just... weird to be in manu images
Lumix special in the head π₯
I'll get started on canon body images when I get home
differential masking
feathering
floodfilling
left to right
think I'll do a mix of differential masking and feathering
nah
...but not perfect
Still white edge on the bottom
Nah but seriously wtf is differential doing π
looks good
logic by me
copilot wrote the fish script
I was the 24 karat golden comb sludging through slop
Similar to how some companies work
Higher up has an idea, and has subordinate make it
AI is the normal way now π₯
oh, note to anyone doing canon pics:
if you search a discontinued item and add "canonusa" at the end there's a high chance you'll encounter "Canon Support for XXXXX", which will have decent quality pics
fills the screen π₯
all the old canon photos felt like they were shot with the wrong white balance
yeah lol
idk or maybe nowadays theyre doing a bit of post work to make everything more netural looking
or maybe they had not the best lights with color casts or something
TRUE
can we use pictures from bestbuy or amazon?
if you can confirm that they're the same as manufacturer images sure
I can't find a normal fucking picture for 1dx2 
I mean, whereelse did they get them
π€·
they didn't coincidentally have the same lighting and room setup as the manu
there's a good chance it's those
but yeah if it has same lighting then it's most likely them
but some sites like B&H do their own photos
so just have to be careful
need to find a way to clean up those corners
drop shadow's a bitch
might just change my approach to background removal, use machine learned or something
experiment with parametric masking on darktable-cli
it's the S9 in plain silver
bro doing anything to not open photoshop
i sysadmin
my whole job is making sure i only have to do it once
also making sure everything's opensource so I can make this a tool on a website
if this thing had tilt instead of flip it would be exactly what i was looking for 
Meanwhile I can churn out a photo done properly in photoshop in 20 seconds with no fiddling
just to go back to your 2nd job on factorio?
look what you've done to the man @errant fox
I havenβt played a lot of Factorio in over a year. I dabble for a day or two and then drop it for months.
thats how i play rimworld
lol
alr kinda cool
200% is actually the amount it matches your search query
it's debugging
i need to remove, just waiting until i rework that panel
I don't think you quite understand math
yeah well tell that to my AI slave
would be nice if the percentage meant completion of information
maybe i will think
my biggest dilemma are the pana bodies with multicolor
silver is technically not the default color of the S9
yeah same issue with fuji, just need to add multicolor later
theres also the sick titanium colorway
so hot
fuck it I'm putting up the titanium colorway
yeah honsetly
feel free to put the best or most unique one
makes it easier to identify camera at a glance
Damn that is sexy
if only it had a fucking tilt screen
does lumix have any good jpg profile stuff like fuji at all?
the workspace atm
ofc you use linux
Was immediately apparent when they wanted to do the hard way just because lol
Just a friendly jab. I understand the personal enrichment and enjoyment of making your own stuff and what not. Itβs still just amusing to me when people choose to do really simple things the hard/long way.
nothing wrong with a little self hate once in a while
Also if you have other purposes in mind like you said earlier I think
Will still give me a chuckle though either way
if you haven't seen it https://www.sharplyphoto.com/lists/hall-of-fame
oops
Ah yes localhost
wow no metadata
"guys my website is not working"
yeah I've seen it
I think the first lens that included a built in switchable TC should be in the hall of fame
Donβt ask me which it was though
lol
I think you should have it work like passportindex
I imagine a lot of things will be on the hall of fame
hmm
also personally think lenses should be upright in thumbnail view
EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x will go on sale in June
I believe so
I donβt think there has been a lens with a built in tc that was a dud yet
more canon shitness with the lighting
if you wanted to be unique and happen to have a subscription to Luminar, they've got a nice studio light correction tool
might give it a try sometime/later, have it on my laptop
can you link me your profile
not at my computer rn but i changed my handle to "shawn"
improved
glorious thumb
very cool
the one thing on my wishlist is the 50 f1π₯π₯π₯
i dont care how shit it is i dont care how slow the T stop is I WANT IT
if i remember correctly it's like t1.4 kek
crocodile mini camera
That's weird to you? Check the coloristic versions of Pentax K-r hah
no it's not weird
the context is just that the S9 is a camera made in the time where everything's black and grey
Yup, crazy idea
But hey, if you want to get a new, colored body, you have to buy that, because as you said no other brands makes colored bodies. Or you can buy a body skin
weird how much a body can change association
left is Pana while right looks like Nikon
@errant fox add Four Thirds
43 is the DSLR mount
M43 is Mirrorless
I need to add this camera
also instead of referring to the sensor as m4/3 refer to it as 4/3
yes, this thing is a DSLR
damn thats annoying
also 4/3 and MFT are Olympus' inventions
whats the actual difference?
oh sensor is same?
think you'll come to learn of many.... weird one offs
Olympus has a whole line of weird looking one offs in the Four Thirds mount
basically i'm asking do i need to add a sensor format entry also or just a mount type entry @proven glade
and it's commonly shown as 4/3 or Four-Thirds?
so right now in mounts i have:
m43-panasonic
i should add 43-panasonic
in sensor formats i have
Micro 4/3
i should change to just 4/3
@proven glade 
Panasonic and Olympus doing their thing again
I'm getting award at Ministry of Education rn so I can't do pics 
yes change it to 4/3
and add 43-panasonic
really it should be 43-olympus
and m43-panasonic
the first 4/3 camera was the Olympus E1 in 2003
and the first m4/3 camera was the Panasonic G1 in 2008
on par with nikons 180-400 f4 1.4x
very good lens
( i have met a few 200-400 glazers on canon π )
what in the leica copycat is this
wym
it looks like an old leica m camera
from the back
idk might just be me
no the backside of it
wair what
they copycated lumix instead??
leica and lumix have always had a thing between them
lots of leica designs are based on lumix
leica's the biggest copycat in the industry
these are deploying now
yikes
tiring doing a whole brand by yourself isn't it @jagged epoch
the fun cameras surrounded by the cameras no one uses or knows about
still no sonypillen people sweating sony π
no one cares about sony fr
leica and pana will be done before sony even gets touched
I'm probably moving to all of Olympus's cameras next, digital and film
if you're bored you can help with Panasonic
@jagged epoch
Maybe
actually having to open gimp
gets it more out of the way of ur hand prolly idk
I like how canon does strap lugs the most
doesnt stick out at all
nikon does it too on some cams others they go out of their way to have the lugs stick out straight idk
z8 at launch had the lugs falling off
S5IIX strap lugs
tucked, strong, secure
a little pokey on the left
i can do sony
for shits and giggles
once leica is done
yea cuz they have holes in the body to make them fit without sticking out 
it's cool
Canon lugs definitely best
this view, for example, but without the lens of course
whats the bug
why are there two trendings
oh :P
it's trending extra
trending^2
Ty
fixed in staging
trying to add a lens for someone - but panasonic/lumix/leica naming is so confusing. It seems to go as Panasonic Leica DG Elmarit 200mm f/2.8 POWER O.I.S. Lens most places, but on shop.panasonic.com it's listed as LUMIX G Series LEICA 200mm F2.8 Lens. I think I'm going to add it as the Panasonic Leica DG... one, we can change it later
https://shop.panasonic.com/products/g-series-200mm-f2-8-asph-leica-1-4x-teleconverter
With its 200mm ultra telephoto focal length and stunning descriptive performance, the LEICA DG ELMARIT 200mm / F2.8 / POWER O.I.S. is suitable for wildlife or sports photography. The 1.4x Tele converter (DMW-TC14) is bundled to extend the focusing distance to 280mm (560mm 35mm camera equivalent) for more close-up shots
also @errant fox the Create Gear page only has manufacturer/amazon/mpb links, not bhphoto/etc
yeah that's cursed
very
yes
figured
good luck the best I could find was from BH which resembles the official Panasonic stuff. But there's no press release/announcement with press photos either
i normally would, but literally everywhere referrs to it as a panasonic lens not a lumix lens. MPB etc too
i really don't know how much i care to dig for a picture
yes but what does the manufacturer do
aren't panasonic/lumix related, and referred to differently depending on market?
i'm guessing that it's a panasonic lens internationally, and a lumix lens in the US or something?
hmm
so why does everyone refer to it as panasonic leica and not lumix
well, i'll rename it then
dunno, maybe Leica paid them to be more prevalent elsewhere. Who can say
panasonic/leica stuff is too complicated for me
i give up
(also probably not the greatest thing to be doing while i'm sick and not 100% in the head)
@errant fox could you add a 1/5" sensor size for the sofort 2
i have no idea why it uses such a specific sensor but whatever
yes
5 times smaller than a 1" sensor
even the iphone 4 has a 1/3" sensor π₯
that's horrid
i'll add it later
also can you add a 200k ISO option
alr
i set it to 11.5x
there's no chance this is uniform across other niche cameras with this type of sensor
but
π€·
that's a problem for later
guys
π
yeah i used it for the first day i had it, then never touched it since
but i'm sure i will one day again
it's mostly just a collector item
hey I can explain
the same way it's Panasonic Lumix it's Panasonic Leica
so it would be Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm f/1.4 or Panasonic Lumix G 25mm f/1.7
instead of writing Lumix, you write Leica
I'm not a historian on the topic but I think how Panasonic names their products, Lumix is the brand, and Leica is also the brand, and Panasonic is the manufacturer/producer, the same way you don't refer to Eneloop batteries as Panasonic, but Eneloop
if you need further reference, m43lenses.com calls them by the names they should go, add G or DG depending on Lumix or Leica
the full full name of this lens
@errant fox works well
also really have to like, edit this photo, looks like it was taken with a camera from 2004
True
makes no sense to me but i'm glad someone else gets it π
Nikon's had it forever with Nikkor
some lenses Nikon, some lenses Nikkor, some lenses Leica, some lenses Leitz
brands, subbrands, branding
now I'm going to go and look because it's just been Nikkor forever though
yeah I thought (without paying attention) that nikon lenses were pretty much all Nikkor
but i don't know for sure
yeah
almost every lens for like the last three decades at least have just been Nikkor
actually I might be wrong on Nikon and Nikkor, Nikkor might just be how they brand all their lenses, but I do see some people refer to certain lenses by the Nikkor branding
i'm sure there are exceptions, being a 60+ year old system, but for the most part
but Leitz and Leica are different in that Leitz is the cinema-focused side of the company, also history and stuff
wiki but yeah
Lumix is a branding
Leica is also a branding
some lenses branded Pana Lumix
some lenses branded Pana Leica, based on who helps design and coat the optics
and some lenses seemingly branded both?
so really we should have Nikon Nikkor Tamron Z 28-75 f/2.8
i see
no cause Nikon doesn't make it
Nikon is just licensing the patent/design basically and making it their own
uncommon nikon L
no it's a W
is the Tamron design or the Nikkor design cheaper?
Presumably they couldn't come up with a better design for the money
so they license the design and then control the manufacturing and qc and slap their name on it
they can utilize that money and time and put it towards other useful R&D projects
everybody wins
but yeah, technically, Nikkor, also a branding, technically the analogy is correct but Nikon's not called a lens just Nikon for a while
I think their film pns lenses aren't referred to as Nikkor
the Z mounts are all AF-S right?
AF-S is specific to F mount
AF-S just means "uses silent wave motor and has A/M switch"
are all the Z mounts one focusing technology?
I see they no longer differentiate, at least not in the name
yeah they don't
only thing in name is S identifier and VR
and DX
and TC for the fancy shit
trying to keep the branding lowkey
thankfully they started to simplify the names with Z
yeah they realized their mistake with f-mount π
i'm sure it will get really ugly again over time though
I see the Pana Leica 200mm has 3 USM motors but no way to find that out in the name
but then Panasonic just slaps the branding in the face by putting "POWER O.I.S" at the end
if only they would do that with their actual focus system names. Silky Swift Voice Coil Motor really slides off the tongue
@errant fox can we get an "external build material" category π
or something like that
Did internal storage (and size) ever get added as an option? I know it's only useful for maybe a few things right now but I think in the future it will be needed as well anyway
is it ever not just plastic?
sometimes metal for vintage stuff?
dont think so, would it just be amount?
you... don't have metal lenses?
my 100-400, 70-200 are both metal and 100 f2 is partially metal too
its mostly coated metal no?
i thought plastic was prefered since it doesnt expand/contract with temperature as much
yeah really just need to be able to check internal storage and then assign an amount that's it. Could just do 1TB for now I don't think there are any other sizes
or maybe preemptively do the common sizes like 256, 512, 1TB
bigma has 320gb or something 
oh the block thing?
looks like 230
The SD card slot is replaced by 230GB of internal memory, capable of storing more than 14 000 JPEG files, 4 300 Lossless compression RAW images or 2.5 hours of video at the highest-quality setting, with the USB-C port offering fast charging and data-transfer speeds.```
I mean if you're in there may as well do the common sizes too may save you time later
π
Yeah will
easy for the one not doing it to say
Iβll just make it number input
hell yeah
No need for predefined options
@tepid nest added
sick
Their film era "E" lenses, which were budget lenses, didn't have Nikkor on them because they weren't good enough for that apparently
Not to be confused with modern "E" lenses, which represent electronic aperture
Those are Nikkor
see
@errant fox add a page or some script to check percentages of each field filled out for each item
would be cool
@errant fox put image submitter as contributor
for being such an elegant product it was not an elegant process finding a good photo for this
a few more cameras from Leica, DJI, and Sigma and L mount's complete I think
@jagged epoch wake up slave
@tepid nest the Z 24-70 2.8 S II has VR?
sources I find tells me lenses for Z generally don't have VR including this one
also, Aperture Ring yes/no if it's technically a Control Ring?
cause that would make a lot of Canons' and Nikons' lenses not have Aperture Rings cause they're either 1x control ring or 2x control ring
afaik no
update
Sir I'm at ΰΉΰΈΰΈ²ΰΈΰΈΰΉΰΈΰΉ
why are you gambling
...what?
I did not consider multifunction control rings as aperture rings when I was doing rf lenses
Cuz there's already a separate control ring input
I could but unfortunately I can backfill this
Most Z lenses that arenβt telephotos donβt have it, ibis is more than enough at low focal lengths
Me when Canon RF 10-20mm has IS
And 35 1.8 
So pointless
Nah bro we can get multiple seconds handheld π₯ π₯
10mm ff is also way too much for like 99% of people kek
I wasnβt done I just didnβt feel like starting again
should we add top down images?
seems like nikon at least provides them
idk about others
yes
add more angles, whether you can find it is another question
i guess no reason not to really
i was worried about storage at first but it seems that's not really an isuse
I know with Sigma and Panasonic they give you jsut about every angle you want
there should be a graphic background-less view, and marketing material view @errant fox
for example, the image I sent earlier, is Sigma's official marketing material for their 200 f2
ahh interesting idea
also have like, a banner
but i think that kind of image is much more likely to be caught for copyright issues
that's artistic
hold on let me cook up what I mean
we could come up with our own thing like that thogh
something artistic like
parametric generation could work
wouldn't be every product, but having a slot to submit something like this would be cool
yeah could do something like this
or just mke our deafult look cooler
idk
cant use their actual content though because it belongs to them
would have to make our own graphic
not all of it, but some are released for marketing purposes or non-commercial usage
Does anyone else see the images cut off like this on mobile on the browse page?
You can always change to desktop mode hah
i fixed it a minute ago
Oh, okay
canon never heard of white balance
common nikon W
making some nice changes to the spec table display logic
hiding a lot of obvious things like
- if the lens is a prime lens, force hide internal zoom value
- if the lens has no autofocus, force hide "has AF/MF switch"
and making some True/False values only show when true or certain other conditions are met
like "has10BitVideo" is only going to show "No" for mirrorless, action, and cinema cameras
for DSLR it will just hide the row entirely (will still show "Yes" on DSLR if it happens to have it)
D7200 before/after
(after = there's no more video section) lol
does it say if a lens is external focus
yes we have internal focus as a true/false
what about focus breathing thats more subjective
afaik there's no measurement of this that's standardized
just something we can include in notes or staff verdict in dramatic cases
i wanna add a page with a bunch of things like this
this image has the actual images from different lenses overlayed on the same scene
then i want to add a "fit" mode where it actualy just changes between the images at full size
You could atleast start with a base image, showing what different focal lengths look like on different sensors
The issue with that is we can't all have the exact same location to shoot at so you'd get a bunch of variety in the comparison photos and it makes it harder to compare
I mean we just need someone with like 16-200mm covered with not too many gaps
I have that myself
13-30, 40, 50, 70-200, 400
Iβll just do a few myself and others can do some
We can do multiple subjects
And could add APSC vs full frame to this as well
this reminds me i entirely forgot to do this a while ago
i have 15-560
only gap is 30-35
Get on it π₯
We have to choose focal lengths though
16, 24, 35, 50, 85, 105, 135, 200, 400
I meant like if you did it on a lens basis like that photo shows
youll have to remind me later once i get my tripod back
Every single mm
but yeah i can cover all of those
Oh gotcha yeah Iβm not worried about that,
That image is comparing effective focal lengths of different lenses of same aperture, I just want to do the focal lengths overlayed
i have all these except 16, i have 17

big difference smh


