#Bird Photography
1 messages · Page 19 of 1
Can I ask what you lot use to edit your photos?
Lightroom classic
Those droplets coming off from the wings are really cool, but otherwise really high ISO and not enough background separation.
Dipper?
yep white throated dipper
i do enjoy those occassional shots though where everything lines up just right and editing needed is minimal. i'm sure that's more frequent with higher end gear
What a goofy sparrow 
wow how rude of him
poor sparrow got sacrificed as my first real attempt at playing with masking
Going for this chonky boi atm
black metal bird
Wanna see them too but theres none anywhere close to me
Theyre 15km from me at some reeds
sick
Waiting begins
nahh too far away, get into those reeds for the ultimate close up shots
allegedly sigma will be announcing an e mount 800mm f6.3 this month
big grain of salt tho til there's actual leaks
Thatd be crazy
Shit quality because it's a preview
I'm going to cook tonight
lil Tennessee warbler
What lens do you use, Vox?
Sigma 150-600mm C
Nice
how's the far end sharpness wise?
Pretty great! That one above and most of my shots posted here / on my portfolio (profile) are right at 600mm / 550mm due to the way my blind is positioned.
only real issue is needing pretty much perfect lighting conditions due to its high fstop and using a dx camera. has me eyeing a Z8 lol, but I came up from a D90 and a tamron 70-300 a little over a year ago so I'm still pretty happy with it
that's good to hear, when I was looking at a 150-600 I found a lot of people saying it could be a tad soft at the far end if you don't stop down
D90+70-300 combo is a helluva step up 🤣 I love my D7500 it's pretty damn good for what it is
I was thinking of going out today but... Light lol
it's overcast all day today which isn't great 
Man the detail you can get with the 180-600 is crazy
I do think this is true from the lab images I've seen (and have had GPT explain to me 😂 ) plus I think you can tell - for example this one is at 500mm (unedited) in similar conditions and seems much sharper
but b/c of sophisticated post processing and that my perspective is coming from a d90, i think it's fine enough for a $600 lens
glad to know i'm at a point in my life where i'm considering spending 1800+ to look at bird follicles.
Can reccomend, it's a lovely lens, really have very little to complain. Except about things that are only really available in the multiple thousand euros teleprimes
right, easy to think about it in levels, like my next jump would be thousands where your next jump is probably 10's of thousands, and the upgrade window gets longer the higher up you are
how do you feel about the z8, did you have a diff body before it?
Had an a6400 before this. The Z8 is such a huge step up in every single way, that I can't even really compare them. The 45MP is super nice to have for birds, high iso cleans up really well and once you get the hang of how to use the autofocus most efficiently it's a real treat. Only thing I wish this would have would be full raw precapture, but other than that, not much else to wish for.
mmm fomo
gonna make me enter generational debt for a bnib z8
fr, looks like the a6400 is a bit better than the d7500 as well so would have an even better time coming up here
Am I the only one constantly struggling with this problem?
Welcome to the team bro 
I have 6tb of storage and i have 4tb used 
I have lately browsed through my old photos and tried to delete some that I don't need. But I'm having difficulties to let go. 😭

Me too lmao
i think almost everyone have this problem 
I made an 'inbox' folder for where I cull photos first THEN move them to their respective bird folders for editing later...except every time I go to cull I find myself editing a specific pic and importing more from my sd card
inbox has 1.3k photos in it atm 😂
I just use FastRawViewer
anything in _rejected gets deleted
I wish I figured that out before I filled up almost 100gb of online storage
My problem might be that I tend to keep almost all photos that are sharp. Now there is good amount of sharp photos so I have tried to start keeping only the interesting photos. Then it comes to that when I'm culling it often feels like every picture of a blue tit is interesting. 😅
VR on the 300mm f2.8 that I bought used about month ago started to do that. Luckily store that I bought it from grants 1 month warranty and I had two days left. 🫣
Yeah imo it's one of the hardest things about Photography. I try to really only keep the great and interesting photos and often will even stop halfway through editing one bc I realize it's not as interesting as I thought
That is so true.
Wow, very lucky that its just inside warranty!
Totally, I already had bit of a cold sweat when it first happened and I started to look for the receipt. Luckily it was only a close call situation and it wasn't over a month ago. 😄
Nice. Im soon getting the sigma 500 f4
@green meadow Goddamn ifs hard to find animals to photograph now here in finland. Its so dead
Yeah hawfinches are crazy big
oh nice, I haven't yet owned a prime. will this be your first one?
Yeah only small birds at bird feeder.
do you try to capture all variations of a bird, female male, juvenile of each? ..realizing last one probably near impossible with most of them looking the same lol
Well not specially, I just photograph anything that comes by. Of course it is nice to photograph new species but for me it is not the main thing. I just try to get nice photos...even from the everyday birds.
No i have a 600mm f4 L is but its soo heavy. But im getting a good profit for it if they buy it
And switching to 500mm f4 sigma. Way lighter
and here i though the 150-600 was heavy at 68oz lol
Weird bird I saw today

Those are some really nice conditions damn
combo of the completely still water with the fog
lovely
Yeah it was pretty sick today, sadly no good pics apart from that one
Water looked like that because it was frozen for some reason
It's not the most beautiful bird but it was worth it
i have 150-600 aswell. its super light. my 600m f4 is fuckin 5.3kg
that look is so expressive i'm not convinced this isn't a human who got turned into a bird by witchcraft
I didn't get the whole weight thing until I took the 200-500 out for the first time
pshhhhh it's not that heavy, I lift more 3 days a week
who knew 5lbs of lens got heavier by the hour
also cool pfp
this is bird adjacent
#🐒・gear-discussion message
If any of yall have experience I would appreciate it
Z8 is killer for birding, if you have the budget i'd pick that ove the Z6III anyday
And also super future proof. If you take good care of the body it will last you 10+ years and no worry about shutter wear bc electronic shutter only
budget is kinda the issue atm
I can get a new z6iii+ftz for the price of a used z8 
caught a blink :p
I might be able to stretch a z8 in a few months if I put some money away and then try to get a decent price for my current birding setup but I would rather not just be without a camera for however long that takes
hmm
am I using the wrong color settings for export
that seems a lot different than even browser view
A7iii and 200-600, idk abt sharp since thats a 3mp photo with blown highlights on the birb‘s head + weird ca thing from my lazy masking probably 
Had to make the photo work since its the only long tailed tit photo I have so far and I really like the bird
Yeah it comes down to your financial situation. But saving up for a few months isn't a bad idea to wait for the Z8
I actually just meant the 3 photos as a whole
Got the same setup and its great
Cant really get sharper than that, next step up would just be more mp
think i'll be using these photos as reference when clearing my inbox. "can you get it to this level? then no, you can't "fix" it. reject it!!"
essentially digital hoarding at this point
Hahaha thank you, but I also got probably like 1000 non edited pics juuuust in case I ever come back to them 
Hoping the a7v will be the camera for this
A1 too expensive, R series too specialized i feel and not fast enough (burst)
Yeah I'm waiting for that, if it doesnt have like 20fps 35mp I'll buy an a7iv
Yep, Sony burst overall is the biggest problem imo
Wouldve already bought an a7iv otherwise
But only 10 fps, and only actually having 10 fps when shooting craw is very mid
Sucks that they limit third party to 15
I mean we dont have that Problem with our 200-600's 
Like that would be a big hurdle if for instance sigma did release an amazing 800mm f6.3 BUT theres that restriction
Tough decision especially since sony‘s 800mm lens is the 400-800 at f8
Yea thats true
yea I’m really jealous, the canon r5 and 100-500 I dream of is so expensive 😭
a7iii half the price of r5 and 200-600 2/3 the price of 100-500
get Sony
Why do ppl go for the 100-500 and not 200-800? Is it the quality or the size
Sony superiority
Or both
ive heard iq isn’t that big of a improvement over the sigma 150-600 I have now
and I don’t like the iq of the sigma much at all
plus the r5 has enough mp to crop down quite a bit anyways
Maybe I’m wrong though
I see, i just watched some of jan wegener‘s vids back then and thought he got nice results with the 200-800
Also the 200-800* def can not fit in my bag
But then again hes just good ig 
Jan Wegener will get nice results with any combo tbf
Real
Featured club
congrats

Representing the birds in the featured channel 🫡
Crazy composition/moment btw
yea that’s insane 😭
Thank you mate! Conditions were super beautiful that morning
Was really far out but 45MP saved my ass 🙏
Congrats, that’s lovely monochrome
And yeah the 45MP sensor makes the Z8 a better pure birding camera
Personally I’d rather have the Z6iii and $1000 towards a nice prime, if budget is a question, but once you have Z8+lens money it becomes the best choice
Yeah I had the right budget for a Z8 and the 180-600. For just birding you'll really have a great time with just that combo for a while
And since the cam is so future proof, there's more than enough time to save for other lenses
I could’ve gone Z8, my issue at the time was that I’d have had to upgrade my computer at the same time
Turned $3500 into $5000 before I even looked at lens upgrades
So I spent less, had money left over for a pair of short primes
Yeah multiple big spending points at the same time always suck
I got 3500eu back in tax returns so basically got a free Z8 
What kinda short primes do you have?
Been looking to get some other lenses for the Z8 as well, but not sure which route I wanna go
Wanna get into landscape photography, thinking of just getting the 24-70 f4 since its dirt cheap
Also wanna get the viktrox 85mm f1.8
Seems like a sexy lens
35/1.4 G, 85/1.4 G, 300/4 PF and a full set of converters
All adapted
Man they will feature anyone these days
In all seriousness congrats that’s a lovely photo
But boo ced cause now I can’t delete the earlier version.
Yeah, the Prestige has completely disappeared if they're going as low as featuring me 
Bc he mentioned the earlier version in the featured channel?
Yeah
Normally don’t let the originals of re edits stay up. But I’ll make an exception for you since you’re a big shot now.
Oh stop it, my ego is already way too big after today
guys I know why my tamron 150-500mm had problems focusing on animals in flight...
I had AF mode which was set only to triggers and therefore there was no time to do it correctly
i'm going to kill myself 
and I had AF balance mode disabled (i don't even know why)
What do you think about the Nikon d500 for photographing birds?
Which type of autofocus are you using? (Like autofocus continuous or what?)
And what’s the camera brand?
Because I think the problem comes from the camera, not the lenses
AF-C with a Sony a6400
I see most ppl with this lens have this problem
Caused to bad settings
And a friend have the same camera but with a sigma tele and the focus is really better
The bird is like : what are you looking at hooman

Can I dm you? It’s easy to lose your answers and I can’t help you properly
It's okay i found the problem i will test that in the day
the settings i put is now really great
Great option
reedits of an old photo with some ai tree branch removal in lightroom, feels like it can help but eh with anything other than bokeh, tail feathers are off
old one for reference, fun to find the old cr3s and try a different edit but i feel like i kinda got the same look, minus some saturation lol
if anyones curious the ef 150-600 sigma attached to a rebel can get small birds in flight
Ok sounds good
Thanks man
Put a 300PF and a 1.4c TC on it for a lightweight prime setup
literally the pinnacle of birding dslr
for nikon at least, I would say it's basically the gold standard across brands too but that's arguable
awesome af, 10fps, functionally unlimited buffer (I barely hit my 33 shot buffer lmao, d500 is basically 20 seconds of continous shooting) and 1.5x crop for reach advantage
oh, and battery grip (unlike d7500, thanks Nikon)
Personally I’d take a D5 over a D500 but some people enjoy the denser sensor
D5 is also like 3x the price
you can get a used z8 body for the same price as a used d5
I really want to buy it but I’m not sure for some things:
- less mp than my Nikon d3500 (that has around 23-25)
- afaik not very costumizable settings (like having a specific button that does a specific thing you want)
- low light
How much for the d5?
$5000 cad
Oh ok so no
I can’t go higher than 1200 euros (around 1150 dollars)
Plz @ me cuz I’m going to bed atm
less mp is a reasonable concern but you're trading a few mp for 2x burst fps and over 15x larger raw buffer
I believe the prosumer bodies (iirc d500 is prosumer anyway) have a decent amount of button customization, with my d7500 I can customize two dedicated function buttons, the ae lock button, another one that I forget atm, as well as set the dials to do different things based on which of those buttons are pressed
low light on apsc is almost always worse than ff, obviously, but I've been happy with the low light performance of my d7500 which I believe is basically the same sensor setup, I can push 4k iso pretty comfortably and even on super dark shots I can recover shadows pretty well with 14bit raws assuming they aren't completely black
ebay has them around 800 usd, I would imagine rather good condition too
So you are suggesting me a d7500 instead?
Okok
no, I was talking about the d500
I was using my d7500 as an example since that's what I have experience with
overall you will be very happy with the d500 coming from the d3200, I wouldn't even consider the mp loss personally
It’s a d3500 but few changes. Btw I’ll consider that. Do you suggest me other good Nikon cameras if the d500 isn’t available?
honestly I'm quite happy with the d7500, it's not as much of a birding powerhouse as the d500 but I haven't really noticed many limiting factors, mainly coming down to my skill level at this point
it's apparently held as pretty good in low light for a dx, one of the better ones I've read
9fps, 33 shot buffer at the highest quality and uhs1 only which isn't great but it's pretty solid build wise and feels great in the hand
Just amazing
With or without branches
The contrast 😮💨🤌
@carmine fox Do you know if the Nikon d500 can display the light histogram when you are in live view and you press “info”. I’m asking to you cuz you seem pretty expert, but everyone can respond to this
fall is a fun time for the colours, had a nice spot there where the sun would always hit from behind the camera
I'm not an expert but thanks lol
I'm not sure, google/reddit might be better
I'm sure someone here has a d500 and can tell you
Light was shite anyways, but still wouldve been a cool moment to capture on camera
Ofc grebes do a pairing ritual right in front of me when I dont have my camera with me
rule one of birding is be an autist and bring your gear literally everywhere
cmon stork me'lad
Yeah I just wanted to have a long walk and the light was bad anyways
But I underestimated the amount of birds there would be on my walk
birds hate us
they always are out doing cool stuff when it's overcast
Can someone tell me if battery grips increase the frame per second?
I know, but a friend told me so….
they do on some bodies lol
@waxen coyote what cam
Nikon d700 and Nikon d500
d700 is 5 without grip and 7 with grip
d500 is 10 without and 10 with
no increase
older cams
idk why
something something more power easier to sustain more fps i guess
i think d850 also does it from 7 to 9 fps
D850 has only 7 fps?
i believe so
And the battery grip is only helpful for the battery life?
And another shot button?
Idk how it’s called
you get 2 dials one shutter a focus joystick and a bbaf button
some cams gives more fps
some doesnt
i need a 600/4 lol
Goldeneyes are always so far out 😭
Who doesnt lol
Street/travel photographers: „its not about the gear“
Wildlife:
The whole genre aint even accessible without getting a tele 
Ok maybe the exception being the trap photography thing using a trigger
Or if you have ninja level sneak skills
I don't even have a chance without a tele and my blind is my house, have a pet door in my window screen I prop open to aim through at the feeders placed only feet away
"Just get closer!"
Nickon when dx 120fps w bird eye af z500 überbirding body
This poor bastard probably has some first hand experience about that kind of encountering. 😬
Yes and it acted normally, but I think animals tries to hide any weaknesses till the end. Looks like it is missing some toes as well.
If he lives through the initial healing I bet he does fine
Birds are resilient for their weight
Damn, very cool encounter to have tho
Yes they are. And if it doesn't it just becomes someones food.
sometimes it is bit rough out there.
I've been cautious to share this shot I got in 2023 because of the conjunctivitis, but i guess while we're here
learned that day about how contagious it is and feeder sanitation once it shows up
at least it seemed fine though for the most part, saw it quite a few more times
Yeah sometimes they get sick no matter what and that is part of life. But keeping places clean is important at feeder.
How do you clean yours?
me I did soap & water / 1:1 vinegar water when I had the metal feeders, but looking for more natural photos I switched to wooden platform feeders connected to my fence.
now its mostly remove the food if I see sick so they don't continue to gather and spread
Well I only feed them in winter and some rare occasions in summer so here freezing temperatures does mostly the job. Then by changing the spot where feeder is so that poo doesn't "pile" up to food that drops to the ground. When feeding season is over I rinse feeders with hot/boiling water.
That makes sense
I am thinking of putting a feeder up this weekend, the side of my house makes a natural blind
we get bird flu almost yearly now so sanitation is pretty much required especially if you see sick birds
10% bleach solution is good but I got a big thing of Virkon S from a vet friend awhile ago and it's kinda scary but God is it effective
usually I do spring & fall anyway just to get rid of any accumulated nasties
And you sanitize once a season?
once in spring, once in fall, unless i see a sick bird
then they're nuked and covered
Makes sense
winter birbs (sad about the second one, still tryna get a decent pic with 2 birds on one branch 😭)
we have the same birds! are you in southern US?
juncos are my favorite
yep! southern Virginia
wish there was some blue tits though
small birds are so adorable
when juncos are looking straight at the camera it’s so cute 😭
yesss
we have cedar waxwings though at least, those are pretty amazing (AL here so non-breeding, but still)

quit stealing all the damn cardinals

There’s about 4 at my feeder at all times during the winter
I was coping about mirrorless until I just learned, scrolling through reels, one of my favorite wildlife photogs uses my exact gear combo
I have some pontification to do and skillz to acquire I reckon
No clue what bird is attacking a owl but i got a sick shot
Hawk owl and something else
turned out pretty okay
Cool picture and attacker is probably a fieldfare. 👍
could be a red wing as well
But idk, not too good in recognizing thrushes
I'm not sure either. Redwing is also a good guess.
think i need to rework the background, less muted and tone down the artificial lens blur, maybe kill some warmth, but the b/a difference is wild lol
long tailed tit in free fall
creed bird
we finally got snow!!
Really angry bullfinch.
Kiitos! Yea a fieldfare!
owl one is sick
what lens you shoot, man?
Thanks!
Nikkor 500mm f4 G VR
damn, how much that'd set you back
Absolutely amazing set of pictures!
Few grand, it's a pretty old lens so you can get them for not too much.
But when people find out what lens you have their like, "holy smokes a f4 prime"
Lol
I really am wanting to upgrade to a z8 or z9
But also be warned, it's a pretty chunky lens, my setup is currently 12 pounds 👀
So worth it though
Even older wide primes are great and much better than consumer zooms. And yeah those are so heavy that you don't want to take them on long hikes.
My experience is that f-mount lenses adapts really well to z-bodies and AF on those mirrorless bodies is pretty great.
Thats what Ive heard, hopefully someday I will be able to make it happen!
Some new large landscape
this one hits hard
final result
v.nice work on the eye especially
Was that brown color in the iris still there in the shadow, just had to pull it out? Or did you need to add the color
it's the original color I just increased its luminance and saturation
Not so long into bird photography but this are the best results I've got so far.
Anyone got any feedback on what to do better next time or with edit?
they're reasonably good
better than my first few cards full
you have the basic components down
I would say for editing, play with subject masking to make the subject pop a little bit
they're well composed and sharp, however they're a bit flat, but that's nearly unavoidable in typical overcast winter so that's fine
kinda like this
#🦀・creatures message
I like to separate the subject (and usually whatever else is in sharp focus according to Adobe), clean up as needed, dupe & invert and then adjust accordingly
thanks for the review. What techniques do you use to seperate them better?
if you can try to get background separation, but that's usually not possible since they tend to do what they want, I would do the whole masking system I mentioned, or at least play around with it, cuz I find myself using it more often than not even when I have good bokeh and subject isolation
hard to get great lighting when it's winter and overcast for 6 months straight here
Adding to the tips: I pretty much always use a graduated density mask to create the illusion of light falling in from one direction. It helps to make the photo seem less flat. One of my examples: #🦀・creatures message
did that already from top right corner. Maybe its just because Im inexperienced but I kinda like this somewhat flat look in this pictures as I think it adds to the situation
I could increase it a bit though
Yeah i'd increase it a bit and also the saturation on the bird itself, just makes it pop a bit more
Like that?
Yeah thats better
Some of my work ❤️
Thoughts on this shot?
Try to make the subject pop a little bit more to make a cooler effect (for example, try to make as less visible as possible the branches in the background)
The picture in my opinion could turn really good
And try to add more contrast to the wings so the transparency can pop more
nice I had started planning a custom floating hide a while also. I should continue it
Anyone got any Willow Ptmarigan pic?
Also where would be the most accessable place to find them, preferably somewhere I wouldnt have to take a shaky prop plane too
eBird my friend
I like getting first hand accounts
that's fine but supplementing them with ebird recent sightings is the way to go
What’s that
The base and frame for a floating camera blind. Essentially you place a camouflaged blanket or tarp over the frame and stand inside it while wearing chest waders in the water.
Allows you to get really low to the water surface and often much closer to animals than you otherwise might be able to.
epic, however it seems cold
also don't think the people at my local pond would appreciate it very much 
Screw em! There's pics to take!
it's not terrible if you wear waders/dry suit and have a layer underneath.
rather comfortable actually
I mean if it gets too bad you can just piss yourself 
true
the neoprene ones are decently warm I imagine
part of me wants to build one still but another part just wants to buy a premade floating hide
yeah probably and just throw a wool baselayer on underneath and you're good
it would be cool to get custom carbon rods for a frame though
fucking ridiculous but cool
Solid round carbon fiber rod with high linear strength is great for structural reinforcement and used in industrial equipment and aerospace applications.
but the tubes not rods
I wonder if you could make one compact enough that you could put it on a ruck frame
this is cool rendering! which software was this done in?
Yeah, there's actually a bunch of placed that make custom length tent poles and I might switch to that at some point. You kind-of need to do an "x" pattern with them though. I'm planning on using 0.5" pvc which should still be really light and is only $4 for a 10ft length.
It's actually just a screenshot from Autodesk Inventor while I was modeling it.
This one is designed to fold in half so I can fit it in the back seat of my sedan.
You could definitely design one that is basically just 2 side outriggers with nothing but a frame in the middle. that would easily fit on a ruck frame, but you would have to do a LOT more testing for center of gravity and stability since there would be a lot less boyant material
awesome
Just saw a bald eagle right next to my house while waiting for the bus omw to college, obviously didn’t have my camera
Finally have my first decent kingfisher pic @gilded yarrow
Encountered it by chance in a little delta next to the sea. I think it came there bc pretty much all fresh water had been frozen over, and the water there is a mix between salt and fresh
did you have the raw ? i want to try something
Niice
Yeah, that's the RAW files Nikon gives me
I went to my kingfisher lake today and its almost completely frozen, didnt see or hear him
Hope he's still there
Got my own kingfisher now lmao
Yeah the frost can be very hard on them. I try to open up some holes in the ice under perches to help them out a bit when I can
if you have time i'm going to edit it in vc creator channel
ayo that's sick
Yup, theres a hole where he could still fish but all the ducks chill there too so no clue
I'll come have a look but can't talk bc there's other ppl over
bad that it's not mine x)
but really good shot it's a good one
it's was cool to edit it
Yeah, Z8 saved my ass. Would've never got it in focus with my old a6400 :,)
Kingfishers in flight are super tough
you trust me if i already did one ? (very blurry bc of the shutter speed but i did it)
show me
let me check if i still have it
(I think I deleted it but I have my doubts)
it was deleted i don't find it
that was the very first time i go at this lake
Ah, that's a shame, kingfishers are such beautiful birds, just so hard to photograph
yeah but with some good equipement, knowledge and luck you can take good photos
Yeah for sure, for me the hardest is finding good locations and then having the patience to sit for hours/days at those locations
btw i found that the large landscape is my format style idk why but i love that
for me it's really easy i have lakes, river and ponds almost everywhere where i live it only take 10 minutes with a bus to go at my nearest lake
it's just a gif
Today was a dipper day. One of my favorite birds to watch and follow what it is doing. 😄
Man I wish we had dippers here in the Netherlands
I think we have them all the way in the southeast, sadly that is a 5 houd drive for me :(
silly chickadees
Thanks. I found great place where I could get close to the rapids/water. Also this bird was extremely co-operative and it wasn't bothered by me at all. Then it flew off and dived regularly from same spot. If only it wasn't in shadow other than that it was nearly perfect spot.
We only have them here during winter in places where rapids doesn’t freeze. Luckily I have two spots within about a 15-minute drive. It’s a great little bird, and I’m always amazed at how it can dive into the ice-cold water. 🥶
At first, I was using 20 fps as the frame rate, but as this series of shots shows, it matched too well with the bird’s wingbeat interval, making the shots look almost identical. So, I had to drop it down to 15 fps to get some variation in the wing positions.
I’ve found that 20fps will usually match two wing positions on ducks as well
Will have to try dropping down to 15, that’s good advice
Thanks
Man I am so close to buying one of those for myself
Lmao bro is just levitating around
True 😅
see i get like 8fps so I dont have this problem
got these two house finches posing for their album cover
Here's my finch contribution from today haha
love goldfinches. we now have an influx of pine warblers over here and i just continue to misclassify them as goldfinches
probably because for the longest time brain could be "yellow = goldfinch"
"Song of a Feather" ahh album cover

featuring covers such as:
"Uptown Finch" by Mark Ronson ft. Bruno Mars
"Bohemian Finch-sody" by Queen
"Smells Like Finch-spirit" by Nirvana
"Free Bird" by Lynyrd Skynyrd
sounds about right
my keep rate for my camera overall is 4.5% 
counting my saved raws and shutter count
what's about 15% for me ? 
I think mine is less than 1%
What 20fps and a trigger happy finger on the shutter does to a mf
real
I've found myself happily sitting in my buffer now that I'm a bit more confident
I used to be scared now I'm all AHHHHHHHHHHHH DO SOMETHING

I'm having gear fomo, greener 600mm pastures
however we appear to be quite sharp at 500
despite 90% crop
I need to test against birds farther away
Today I took 5740 frames and ended up keeping 84 pictures and even then there is some that I won't probably ever use. So today my keeper rate was 1,5% and for fly/action shots it is definitely even less. 😅
When your photo turn into a drawing 
first halfway decent shot of redshouldered hawk
pulled over on the side of the road w/o a brace so was swaying all over the place with the 150-600 lol
Can someone help me figuring out if bird photos I took recently I should edit any of them out ?
I think the main problem in all of these pictures, is that the birds are very small in frame. There's also very little action hall ing in most of them. If u start implementing more action and getting closer shots of the birds, it would improve your pictures a lot
This was the closest I could get to them with my 100-400 mm lens I'm not sure how to get action shots of it
focus on filling the frame first
These were all in Auto mode cause I had just gotten the camera when I took these shots
Is that the one that has the blue bird ?
ther e is too much going on in all of these
were you at 400mm for all of these?
But what if that's not possible for things like birds ?
Some of these birds are in the water and going to them isn't possible
then it wont be a good photo lol
Not even with a different lens ?
no not really
unless you have a 800mm lens or smth
then maybe
but like lens cant usually fix you being that far
Also, on auto mode doesn't it focus on the main object ? and the background might not be the main focus ?
you look in #🦀・creatures right? how close they are?
Do you think that it might be an issue of the 100 - 400 mm lens ?
Or an issue of my skill deficiency perhaps ?
what camera body?
Canon EOS R7
Also, should I put what camera I use in my profile somewhere?
But for some of the shot I wanted to capture the birds specially and didn't really want to focus on the background like the storms
*storks
With that should it not be on Auto mode ?
nah only if you want to, just preference.
it's not the body at least, better than mine lol. not familiar with the 100-400mm but looking on flickr, looks like you're getting what that lens can do that far away https://www.flickr.com/search/?text=canon+ef+100-400mm
auto will focus on whatever your focus point is on. it sounds like you're meaning depth of field, which is aperture http://www.thedigitalprocess.com/aperture-priority-and-depth-of-field/
the focus was on full auto mode?
as in doing everything on its own?
Yes @fallow token
So if I wanted to take only the storks haven't I achieved that in some of the shots ?
okay id change the af to some sort of tracking mode or single point if you want best results
im not sure what the r7 has but letting the camera decide often wont give the desired result
I'm not sure how to do the tracking mode on mine
But my lens was on 400 mm with these shots so I'm not sure how exactly I could have gotten it crisper
against the sun, but i like it
found more pipers and lots of different ducks too around, 2x TC on the 500 f/4 is tough at times but other times gets a decent enough shot, noticiably is softer though than without
any examples?
2x and still looks that nice damn
(its like 13 lb so i bring both and swap when i get tired)
which 500 f4?
oof huge thing
far away shots itll struggle (anything will with distance)
but it does land sharp shots at times
full crop?
yeah
still very nice damn
will say it's AF suffers a lot with 2x (1.4 is fine) but one of these days ill get a chickadee close up again lo, some stuff zooms just are easier for anyway, swinging 13lb around like air is hard
no monopod or anything?
i do have one but i generally handhold it
my zoom is about the same, got the 100-500
used to feel heavier, now it feels like im taking a break lol
always gonna be a heavier lens out there 
think if i ever plan to stay somewhere for hours like a puffin tour again id bring some stability, or just go with my zoom
seem some guy with a 400 2.8 struggling to stand on a moving boat
learnt that after taking almost all my kit on a 4 hour hike lol
definitely need to get out birding again sometime looks fun
only like 12lbs lmao
definitely need a monopod or something for that
i need to get out more lately but its a sheet of ice here, today not so bad
last few times ive gone out have been very icy or just entirely grey as the uk usually is
sucks to happen but what can you really do 🤷
spring will be soon but where im at theres like 5000 species of waterfowl, can expect to see the tiny yellow fluffs swimming around again, prob more herons too
winter seems like its loons, some ducks, little songbirds, bluejays, cardinals
1 and 4 do look to be poor af
2 looks okay just a tad dark and 3 looks to be affected by fog or something making visibility worse
the r7 is incredibly capable
i would try using some other autofocus modes where you get more control over it as the camera cant do it all every time
What seems to be the deficit with the 4th one ?
For the first one is it bad because the focus is off on it ?
my bad i stated the wrong image
1st is poor focus yet
4th is barely out of focus it seems
as you can see it looks a lot clearer on the water
2nd was shot before sunrise so it seems that it was a bit darker of a shot
You mean the water looks clearer than the bird ?
the water is more in focus than the bird
therefore the r7 probably missed by a little bit
Little fella wouldn’t leave my car alone. Loved lookin in the mirror 
Yeah these were all shot with Auto in the R7
I didn't change the mode even once
theres your issue
you need to learn the cam a bit more
use different modes and learn the autofocus
This was when I was a real beginner to using a camera
the cam doesnt exactly know its shooting birds so wont always use the best settings
Makes sense
i dont exactly know how the r7 is but there should be some basic tutorials online for birding with it
not entirely true
you can have a good bird photo even if the bird is 1/10th of the frame
it's mainly about telling a story or conveying the emotion
well with those bgs it wont be
you absolutely can
it's more than just perfect bokeh and institutionally clean closeups of birds
could also improve some of them by taking the time to frame them better and get closer to the ground
like technically this is a shit photo, it's soft and a very heavy crop
but arguably it has more story than my other dozen crisp birds on a branch images
But that does have a clean background though, nice contrast to the bird
I think that the heron photo has potential with some editing
This one I mean
Maybe some high contrast bnw, a somewhat minimalist fine art approach typa thing
@echo rain but yeah I think one of your biggest issues rn is to learn the camera and get off auto mode. Going full auto does not generally work well with birds or most genres of photography as it often does not get u what u want
sure, but could be technically better
messy background is fine if you can compose your frame
one of the biggest things is living 300m away from a refinery apparently
that haze obliterates any semblance of sharpness, you're certainly gonna have to get closer
Most detailed picture I’ve ever seen. What lenses did you use and how far were you from the mandarin duck?
What do you guys use as camouflage? Kinda want to get something for sittings next to feeders and at my spot for the Kingfisher. But a full on tent hide seems kinda clunky and annoying to log around, so I'm leaning towards one of those camo nets you can throw over yourself and camera with peepholes in it
A tamron 150-500mm and i'm really close (1-2 meter close)
I use a net and a outfit
Good combo
cut up 3d netting or a decently sized rifle veil works
it's what we use for hunting, I would imagine it's more than effective and slightly overkill for birding
Please help! I can't hold much longer!!! 😄
excited to see this shot that looks awesome
Fantastic
Thanks! 😄
This one is quite good also. As you can see blue tits are kinda only birds to photograph here currently. 😅
still prefer the first one, bur this one is fire as well❤️
i was really close to this heron but the quality isnt still much. Why? I was with an aperture of f/10 with my sigma 150-600 f/5.6-6.3 and a shutter speed around 1/1250
f10 will be at or near diffraction limits on most sensors
idk i think ir was focused well… iso i need tk check
7.1-8 is usually rule of thumb for best spot on 150-600
i saw online that for my lenses the sweet spot was around f/10-f/11
iso 640
You have the raw let me try something
i have it, one sec (it is not cropped too)
oh
i dont know id u can open that, lemme know pinning me
i've already open nef
so u opened it? Sorry im nit english so dont be angry if i dont understand smth
Now im not on the discord app and the images are really bad. Ping me so i can go to these messages when i’ll be on the app again so the quality will be better
btw what did u use?
DXO pureraw
it's a paid app but when you have it it's massive
??
LOOOOOOW TAPER FADEEEEEEEE


edited vs raw (denoised)
i'm really lucky to have a lot of bird species in a really small lake accessible by bus
(the size of the lake is like a tiny tennis court)
in terms of birds, we have plenty of species of passerines including the kingfisher, ducks (mallard and teal), cormorants, herons, egrets
i'll trade you for alabama, counting 16 mourning doves, 6 cardinals and 2 squirrels in the yard rn.
same here, but not near where i live. We literally have one of the most visited places for bird watching in Europe
afterwards I am in a region of France extremely rich in birds
we have more than 376 species of birds in my region (compared to an average of 330 species of birds throughout France)
we are the region richest in bird species
I have a terrible habit of editing after 5-7 business days of taking the photo
ooo nice one
makes me wish i'd brought the longer converter, but it was a fun shot
it can be really good for a 5:2 landscape
how exactly is it better than lr
Superior optical performance and agility for professionals:
The innovative Sigma 300-600mm F4 DG OS | Sports combines the power of a prime lens with the freedom to zoom.
Made in Aizu, Japan.
Product Information | https://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/c025_300_600_4/
#Sigma #Sigma300600mmSports #SigmaAizuJapan
#SigmaSports #SigmaSportsZoom #Si...
its a lot better at denoising
but i havent found any other use for it personally that lr cant do
Bro how much does it cost
79€ or 100€
Where is that if I may ask?
in this case it's not very visible but in some other case it's really visible
pixelation is a bit offputting
DXO (200% zoom)
doesn't seem like a worthwhile upgrade for $220 tho
lightroom (200% zoom)
for you it's 220€ ? 
wild
dollars
not euros
yeah it's aprox the same
it's 118€ actually
pureraw is?
yep
I'll try the trial I suppose
I dont think it's worth the money at this point
200% crop is aggressive and a bit of an edge case, I don't think anything looks good at 200% crop
it's just to show you i'm never going to do it 
but like that you can see the difference
what denoise level did you use
even at 40 it starts to smooth details
I stay around 30 or so
i'm at 50 on lightroom and DEEPRIMEXD on DXO
is pureraw apart of photolab
dxo is not just denoise, it removes chromatic abberation, lens distortions, increases sharpness, removes vignetting
yeah I saw that
increase sharpness seems like a gimmick
it's just smart sharpening, which is cool
the only way to increase sharpness is better light or glass 
that of dxo allows you to retrieve a lot of information in quite complex areas such as bird plumage
I suppose so yeah
I'm just put off by the
MUH NEURAL NETWORK
MUH DEEP LEARNING
marketing wank
crazy, but for 6k I'd probably rather get a 300 2.8 with converters
I think having the zoom lends to the versatility more
@dark ermine
little sunbird attracted to the mirror on my car from yesterday
and a couple quackers
Just wanted to try something
Wouldnt that be more expensive in total? Since the 300 itself is like 6.5k€
300 kinda short
Holy shit that’s crazy
You know what else is crazy?
thanks
lovely! not every day you see a birb checking itself out. the bokeh is really plesant on #3 as well
this is a good comparison, do you have the raw to share? want to see the difference between a high pass filter in photoshop
it's on my sd card i'll give you when i have time
oh damn I had 4k or something in mind, yeah nvm then
Are you going to wait until someone asks „what“
or is this meant to be left unanswered
Yeah. I think its pretty crazy thats its less than half the price of the 600gm and a zoom. Hopefully the reviews dont disappoint
Yeah and 300-600 f4 is kinda insane
300-600 f/4 for 6k feels odd
like too good to be true
will see what happens
without prior knowledge if you just asked me how much id think itd be something more like this, hopefully its a good alternative though
I think big teles have always been overpriced just because they could get away with it
like big elements definitely cost more to make than a smaller lens but most of the elements are small
and theres stuff like sigma 105mm 1.4 which has a huge 105mm front element and is sharp af but is $1600
well i dont think sigma is innocent in making money either, like, i dont think for a second theyre doing it and losing money
maybe using cheaper alternatives which can affect quality, such as a 150-600 vs 100-400
but that doesnt make it bad
dont think id preorder though, wait for reviews lol
sigma made a 500 f4 for $6k a while ago
yeah and it had its own flaws
use to not even work really on RF mount until they patched it
the 500 f4 was 16 elements in 11 groups
and the 300-600 is 28 elements in 21 groups 
as it stands now its good, but it had various AF issues
plus the lens i got which is the mk 1 500 f/4 didnt and is 1.5k
u cant compare new to used prices
im thinking consumer wise
200-400 is prob about the same as this 300-600 used or around it roughly
what im hoping is that it beats that old lens + has better fl
I think if panasonic s1rii ends up good it would be a great combo
44mp 40fps with pre capture and teleconverter support
on sony its still pretty cool but limited
also looks nice as a lens in general
dunno if panasonic af can keep up with 40fps and a 600 f4
doesnt seem itll be on canon for now for me to worry about buying it but i think im fine anyway with what i got
this is like the only other thing i can think of similar in sigmas line up
not many really cared much for it since it was heavy, pricey, uncessary and all but this one looks better in that regard, 300-600 seems to be 8lb
id prob recommend a monopod though lol, but im also guessing its internal zoom, 500 f/4 is hard somedays
theres some hands on videos with it alr
internal zoom nice controls
about the same size as a 600f4 but a kg more
if i were to upgrade from my 100-500 which ive no reason to id want something like that i suppose, clearly i could handle the weight now but still hefty
kinda looks like the rf 600 f/4
I literally wrote the answer below the question
Oh yeah my bad
Btw it was low taper fade, but now it is not funny anymore
💀
naw still funny, just in a different way lol
this chonky boi
meirl
f6.3?
I sometimes struggle to get the toesies in focus at 5.6 for some reason especially when they're leaned forward like that
Personally idt it matters that much, just need the eyes and majority of the face in focus and Im happy
Yeah usually I focus on the face but I like the look of the full sharp body
looks more "professional"
not sure how else to put it
the objective of this edit is to make the flamingo scary with the eye with an oppressive ambiance
7.1, it usually does ok at my shooting distance to grab the entire front body. example this chickadee. i think it's just motion blur because those little guys are just so fast and I scramble every time I see one perched for more than half a second.
cleaned up pretty well though
nice what kind is this? assuming something warbler
That looks sick
gl! i feel like waiting for kingfishers should be classified as a type of meditation
Hmm, I could do that too
Could at least check if he's still alive
I already have shot this one from the lake but i want a better one next wednesday and thursday i'll go in the full day
I WANT THAT CLOSE UP 
Same bro
30 hours for nothing
Not a single pic
Omw to the lake now lmao, wanna see if the kingfisher survived the frost
ngl I'm like 80% sure the one at my lake didnt survive
Havent seen or heard him last time I was here and the lake was almost completely frozen over for like almost a week

Lol this is kinda cool
Angry birds. Shame that it was bit too dark to get good results.
Bro I dont understand how you get so many bif shots, I tried again today and didnt get a single one
This is the closest I got lmao
I feel like I need more fps and better af for bif
Kinda happy with this one, not really tho
That woodpecker looks ready to murder
I just take a huge number of photos. Also I think that I have learned to anticipate when something interesting is about to happen. Lately I haven't been using precapture because those jpeg's feels quite limiting after all. So 20fps is enough but more could be better. 😅 Z9 AF keeps amazing again and again. It is not 100% but my experience is that it is really good.
Really sharp frame and cool bird. Is it firecrest? Goldgrest are quite common here, but firecrest are rare visitors.
Yes it does. They are clearly more aware of their territories as spring approaches.
Are they nesting yet? Might be a bit early but one never knows
Not yet but they are drumming a lot. I think that it has something to do with marking territories.
@scarlet tulip What are your thoughts of Z6III and its af capapilities?
My major point of comparison is the Z6, and the Z6iii wins without much trouble
The z6iii lacks bird-AF, but I have not found that to be an obstacle
It acquires focus on the eye very well
If you are on a 45MP sensor you will miss the ability to crop
Does it find birds eye even without dedicated bird af?
It does, it’ll grab the eye or the head if it’s a very dark bird
If Z8 bird-AF is even more reliable then it must be some real magic stuff, because the current Z6iii setup is excellent
Definitely yes. And great that Z6III works so well. It would be nice to test and compare those.
Those eagle shots that you posted were amazing
I was not happy with my lens choice that day, but it was a special moment
Never seen one from that close
Camera did its job against a pretty dirty background, the Z6 would have had issues with tracking
I can imagine that it was something else. It is always nice to come back home with some memories of that moment and that kind of photos are also a great bonus.
I’d gone out for ducks that day, and only knew the eagle was coming when about 50 birds all got up and flew away at once
Goes totally silent, then the eagle glides in
Pretty sure its just a goldcrest
OH WAIT
FIRECREST YEAH
LIFERRR
yeah our goldcrests looks like this and I'm quite sure that you have seen a firecrest. Congrats!! 🥳
pretty close indeed. Seems that kinglets are also really small birds.
I got chills just thinking about that moment. 😀
You get the white-tail eagles in Finland, right?
They seem like a lot of fun to watch, very active hunters
Yeah we do. More common at shore but it is possible to see them inland also now and then.
Sometimes they are active. But they can also spent hours just by sitting at the favorite spot and then it does something interesting just when you look else where. 😅
they stare the world like : i'm the king of this place and nobody will remove that from me
indeed 😅
They sit and stare, then when you look away they leave
Only saw one so far and it was like 200m high, still insane tho
Their size is crazy
Only pic I got 💀 
beautiful day today
+3 and bright sun all day but next to ZERO bird action in my usual spots :(
im cooking on this one
how much time did you spend masking the bill 
15 second lol
(object mask)
ahh nice
it's a good use for some
that's wild. also the line on the bottom of the top bill makes it look like the bill is both closed and open at the same time
ah yes well seen I hadn't even seen
this edit hits really hard in term of color recovery
the line ?
ohhh yeah in dumb lel
reminded me of some weird artifacting I get sometimes so immediately thought of that
I just saw a bif shot off a d3400 that made me feel a bit inadequate
always someone else better with worse gear to humble you
"worse"
not like that matters but still 5fps with a 16 shot raw buffer requires either more luck or more skill
probably both
it probably took a lot to get that shot though. personally i'm all about work smarter not harder. bif def requires luck, patience, and / or finding / staging a spot that's easier to predict movements
i can only imagine still shooting with my d90, the hits would slap harder because they'd be so few and far between, but i'd take one look at antti's discards and probably give up lol
speak of the devil
Sure
hardest part is getting em in frame without them also being so small in your frame that you need to crop a lot
need medium format birding once af gets good 
I have pretty good autofocus but taking pics of small flying birds makes me wonder how much better the flagship stuff is because it's still frustrating
I got this one but also like 2mp lmao
Treecreepes was this time a groundcrawler. 😅
all that tree creeping has him due for a ground sit
He’s got to rest
Feather shooting 
Really like how you got the dark greens to look
Oooh nice
I'm trying my macro room with some things and a feather was part of it
It's just a raw preview but this is what it looks like (mallard hen feather)
thank you!
the only thing I might do is make the jump to the black vignette more gradual (ignore the artifacts, quick example) and pull the highlights down a bit in the subject to regain some detail in the face
usual disclaimer eye of the beholder and all that. still like the original!
this is really cool. what light are you using there in the box?
Yeah true maybe its a bit much, thanks 
A small rig light and the box have leds too
Just get a9iii, pretty cheap
Holy sharp
Lmao
600mm + 1,4x tc so it was 840mm at shutter speed 1/60s and hand held. 
Man I love the stabilization of the Z8 and Z9
It's so incredibly good
You can just handheld 600mm without a problem, even with some wind an tired arms
Yes it is and vr+ibis combination makes stabilization feel bit like magic. 😅
Also on extreme cases, like that goldcrest photo, I usually take much longer bursts and that way there is far better change that one or two images are sharp.
Yeah I've only ever had to go that low in extremely dark conditions
Was taking pictures on one of the rare times we got snow here and was at 1/50 and 5000 iso
But got some really sharp results still
Day 2 for the kingfisher
In my opinion bohemian waxwing might be one of the pretties birds at least here in Finland.
waxwings are by far the prettiest imo, they almost look like a painting come to life
couldn't get close enough unfortunately but saw a flock of them back in december
didn't even realize they were waxwings until near the end right before I went home, first time seeing in person
headed to a wildlife refuge today, hoping to see a whooping crane, ~536 left as of 2023
https://ebird.org/species/whocra
Larger, pure white, rare cousin of the Sandhill Crane. One of the tallest birds in North America, striking and unmistakable: brilliant white overall with black wingtips and a red crown and mustache. Male and female similar; juvenile stained cinnamon-brown and lacks red on face. Only a couple hundred individuals left in the wild, but population s...
I'm so happy to have sold them
Heading to Singapore this month, seems the big thing rn is a Black thigh falconlet
But could change later
These are gorgeous pictures. I love the detail of the wing
when
which date(s), i can join you
19th-27th
My favorites shots of ferbuary
seems like i always get a chickadee each start of the month lol, but heres another one
wat lens?
Canon EF 70-300

