#Bird Photography
1 messages ยท Page 17 of 1
What's the preferred metering mode for birds? Also, what is the consensus on auto iso? it seems to be best for very dynamic scenes cuz it was pushing mine to 2500 in some parts when 1-1500 was more than sufficient
I use full manual pretty much always, used Auto iso for a few weeks but didnt like it, exposure was never as good as with manual iso
Metering Mode -> my eyes
yeah that's what I figured, it seems like it would catch a shadow and over expose the whole frame
Contrary to the last point, I usually just have the 'full scene' equiv metering on at all times and use Auto-ISO. If the exposure is off it's easy enough to just flip through exposure comp quickly. Shooting full manual risks missing shots due to rapidly changing conditions or the bird moving around an unevenly lit scene.
The point where a modern camera massively fucks up exposure to the point you cannot recover is few.
And well, with an EVF, it's easy to see before you screw up that hard.
yeah I understand that, I only have 21mp to spare & 300mm eqiv so I want everything to be as optimal as I can, I've lost a few good shots over the past few days from auto iso and full scene metering, weighted centre and full manual seems to have gotten a few keepers, I try to use live view & test shots where they'll be flying to make extra sure tho
at the end of the day - horses for courses. Use what works best for you in the given situation.
Well I just leave aperture and exposure time the same and change iso unless I go from shooting flying to sitting birds then I change exposure time too
But yeah different people will do it differently, doesnt mean they cant all have good results
Just try what works best for you
I used to have a gif somewhere of one of the birds I shoot. It was a 3 second burst at 7FPS and the birds has like 15+ different poses in that sequence. If I have to stop to change settings I miss the shot usually, so it's gotta be as fast and fluid as possible.
Most of the times I shoot with matrix metering and auto ISO. As @pure belfry said then it is easy to adjust with exposure compensation. And I do adjustments to that really often almost constantly. I have noticed that only time that it doesn't work really well is if background changes rapidly from really dark to really bright. Like bird flying against trees and then background changes to sky. When I'm expecting something like that to happen then I change to manual ISO.
that would line up with what I was shooting today yeah, maybe that's why it was acting up, water+reflections into a pretty constant treeline which might've been throwing it for a loop, I'll have to try it in a more constant environment and see how well it works for me, at this point I'm so used to manual iso it's strange not paying attention to it
I do pretty much the same as Raptor and Antti. Just auto iso and if the camera over or underexposes I just change the exposure compensation, works pretty well most of the time.
like I said I haven't played with it much, I'll try again tomorrow when I'm out at the pond, thanks lads
But I can imagine that with a dslr its harder to judge than with a mirrorless camera, in the end it's best to just try it out and see what works for you
Hello bird photographers, can someone tell me for certain if this bird is an eagle?
Head and beak looks like a cormorant. I might be wrong
The bird itself was black and white and it was in North Queensland
Black faced cormorant. Thanks for your help
@green meadow Congrats!
Thanks ๐
Yeah, if changing ISO manually comes naturally to you, then it is kind of same as using auto ISO and exposure compensation. ๐
nvm they are out of stock, and 8 other sellers too.
might just buy a camo net lol
buy the buteo photo hide
Thats a cormorant yes. If in europe, then thats Phalacrocorax carbo
I am in Australia so it must be a cormorant
there are douzains of cormorants. Phalacrocorax carbo is a cormorant, it's its scientific name lol
cormorant is not a species
Evaluative metering (default) + auto iso and exposure comp dial for me
Unless im waiting on a particular spot with consistent ish lighting I think going full manual would be too much of hassle lol
I am all out of bird photos or any photos atm 
Few times i did go out for birding i had no luck and for now i dont have the time
I usually sit on a rock watching the ducks & geese take off & land
mainly BIF practice honestly, but I only really need to adjust when the sun starts to set
auto iso is very temperamental in my conditions atm
Is that the northern one that was mentioned the other week?
Yeah I think so, the only one and first one ever in germany
Congrats!
Thanks 
Congrats!
very cool
Amazing and congrats!
Thanks guys 
Yeah it was crazy, at first it was an accident but then I realized he's super chill and even kept singing even tho I was standing literally 2m or even closer to him
There was also a dark sided flycatcher like right next to where I live last weekend, 1st for the Netherlands and 3rd for Europe, sadly I was away the whole weekend
Oh cool
1st quick edit, not sure if I like it
just don't forget the spots between the feets and between the birb and branch when you edit further ๐
Oh yeah true
the crop is to change
Yeah that pic is pretty much uncropped
Bit more color
In all the other pics he's behind leaves
Maybe I'll go back there tomorrow and try again lmao
still a lot too centered imo
Would cut the tail off otherwise
Or theres no room on the top and the bottom
maybe
Yeah maybe I'll go back tomorrow for more pics lol
@spring vault What about this? Tried generative expand for the 1st time haha
I was so excited to see that bird that I didnt pay attention to composition etc lmao
many such cases
could anyone please identify this
I took it in southern England august 2022
just back tracking through photos to compile a list of species ive captured but cant figure this guy out
only thing i can see which looks similar ish is
Alder flycatcher
which i doubt it is
wagtail maybe
damn
thank you
yeah a juvenile one
well the image im looking at seems close enough
not the sharpest photo ever, but def my favorite I've ever taken
from today, no less
nyoom
I wish I had my aperture slightly higher it would've been literally perfect
also Mr. Squirrel feeling left out
haha
man just swiped that shit
really proud of this one, got a bunch like this from today, a small group of nuthatches was putting seeds from a nearby feeder into this post... and the chickadees would come steal them seconds later
Sweet!
Was it hard to find?
Nope not at all haha
yesterday I found it instantly because he was singing, today it took like 5 minutes
He was way more active today, flying around and even drinking from a puddle at one point
Probably because I was there a lot earlier than yesterday
Do you have a uv filter on your lens?
No why
Ah I was wondering bc of these lines in the bokeh. I noticed them in some of my shots as well and was wondering if it was bc I was using a uv filter on those shots.
Ahh thought you were thinking it isnt sharp thats why I was confused lmao
Thats just jpeg artifacts/banding
Discord makes it worse
Isnt there in the original
No wait it's not the banding im talking about
It's like straight lines in that direction
Or is that just me tripping
They're very faint but still noticeable as a pattern in the bokeh
Oh yeah I see them too but just barely
Like almost not there
lmao
Wait I'll see if theyre in the raw too or if thats because of the editing
Ohhh I know what it is

Theres a wire fence behind him, far enough away that its basically gone but just barely noticeable
I think thats where those lines come from
Not 100% sure tho
nice bird
mockingbirds are the best they make the coolest sounds
Hhhmm I dont think it's that, bc u can see it in the grass too
My theory is that it's like the intersections between bokeh balls which are in a very even pattern bc the background is pretty uniform and far away
Bc u can kinda see it on the right as well, but less clearly since there's more variation in the bokeh balls
Not bird photo related, but this older squirrel photo of mine recently got featured on my countryโs sony alpha instagram 
Not the best of my work so idk why they decided to feature that, but a featureโs a feature anyway
I believe this is the squirrel
this is awesome, plus the squirrel in the background, think this is the most interesting action birding shot I've seen honestly.
Opinions?
I didn't even realize until I was reviewing them heh, lil guy was gone in an instant
thanks btw!
What do you guys think
I think this one could be pretty nice too, havent edited it yet tho
very clean
Damn. The guy took 161(of 238 observed) unique bird species pics in 50 days.
Hopefully i can go into such trips/missions in the future.
sadly my day job says no
3 per day isn't too bad, but you'd have to be out every, day which is the hard part, weather doesn't really cooperate
Yea
Any one awake here ?
There are more than 20,000 people on this server...
I would say good morning/evening but with 20,000 it could also be midday ๐
So what does a person has to do to start a conversation here ?
Hope I'm not being too forward ๐
If I'm am... do tell me so I can adjust... I'm here to have a nice conversation about birds in flight and photography in general not to offend any one ๐
i guess just be a bit patient for replies, a lot of different time zones here ๐
oh lol hello again. yea I'm really bored and eager to talk. You are right of course. see you in the other channel we are talking on ๐คฃ
hello bird people
what are these birds. i dont bird often
identify my birbs for me
1st one is some species of bee eater
last one seems to be some kind of finch
but I'm not familiar with these species tbh since they're not from Europe
Yeah I'm in Australia
Nice, Australia has some really cools birds
The bee eater is a rainbow bee eater to be specific btw
And the finch is a Chestnut-breasted Mannikin
I think the other one is a golden-headed cisticola
Yeah I'd agree on that
What setting are best in your opinions for bird in flight photography ?
High shutter speed, preferably 1/4000. Also if the light allows I'll stop down to f/8 to get a bit more sharpness and have a bigger chance of hitting focus. Iso I just leave on auto
Nah 1/4000 isnt needed
Small birds 1/3200th, bigger birds you can even go as low as 1/1000th-1/1600th
I'm wondering if my af will sufice for a bird in flight (d750)
oh its the zoo from our other channel conversation. really beautiful. keep up the good work.
Thanks!
Thanks for the reply go sleep the hungover off. It help I think... never been drunk in my life ๐
Copy pasting my comment from else where:
I use nikon D7200 and have no stabilizer on my 70-300 lens so I usually shoot at 1/800(something) shutter speed, ISO on 200-500 depends on the sun and lighting conditions, and my lens at 300mm is maxed on f5.6 so it is what it is...
auto ISO tends to get the the picture well balanced and the subject (mostly pigeons) to dark.
also I use manual mode and set all the parameters to be just right for 3 of the lighting option I have in the scene in front of me, then wait for a bird of any kind to pass by, and continues auto focus+6.0 picture per second the heck out of her ๐ while I pretend I'm a rock with a camera stuck in it ๐ ๐
I've had relative success with as low as 1/2000 for small birds, 1/1600 for perched is fine, too
all depends on your light, higher is usually better
got excited and forgot metering was a thing apparently
cool shot, hopefully recoverable
Looks well exposed for the situation tbh, better to underexpose so you don't blow out the white feathers on it's head
dang! you have time to set up a tripod that's crazy
Haha yeah the bird completely ignored me
Which ones cooler? I like the 2nd pose more but that 1st background is like 100x better
Lmao
Ez fix
The power of technology
light autumn rain
suprised i got so close up
kinda felt like adding in more rain post processing but this is natural lol
That is one beautiful cormorant
double crested cormorant, was on a little decorative boat earlier
they have these bright blue eyes which i got in the above photo, rain can be interesting to shoot in
Dont our cormorants look basically the same
Pretty much
Just without the eyebrow and blue eye
Love how the blue eye matches with the orange/yellow beak
Just had a white tailed eagle fly by in Amsterdam
Didn't expect it in the city
Barely had time to get some pics, thought it was a buzzard at first ๐ฌ
Why is it always the sticks that are in exactly the wrong place
I choose to believe they do it on purpose at this point
mockery
that's about it
they know what they're doing 
They're just out there to bully me, I feel it
Got some decent shots tho
lighting conditions were super tough, in the shade, this was at 5000 iso and I still had to crank on like 1,5 stops of exposure in post
Topaz is my best friend for these shot
Also have thise one where halfway through editing I realized it was out of focus.....
many such cases 
overcast?
it's 50/50 lol either perf lighting or obscenely bad in some places
Yeah partially cloudy, so one moment you actually had some spot of light where the birds sometimes sat in, but then most of the time the light was on the wrong part of the body
Tough conditions but some good lessons learned
See @exotic cosmos, finding wildlife isn't too hard in the Netherlands, even in the big cities ;)
Hahah nicee bro!! ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ
low mp tree ornament
Almost naturally black&white hooded crow
And its not even winter yet...just overexposed grey sky. ๐ But snow is great for clean backgrounds. ๐
windy and very sunny today
my favorite combination, the lil songbirds tend to perch low
wish me luck
Yeah thats great, they'll drop into foliage for cover from the wind
Great for spotting migrating birds
Anyone here also record bird sounds? Not sure what mic to get 
I would imagine something highly directional
Today's birdies
The last pic 

I still need to find a spot where I can take in flight pics of small birds
Bit different angle ๐คญ
Beautiful shots tho!!!
I'm a little confused is this like a new group? On discord?
Just asking๐
i demand you be offered a specialist role for that last pic alone
Thanks, I really like that treecreeper photo even thou it is not the sharpest one or otherwise special photo. But for me somehow it is just interesting little bird.
No really new it has been here from 2022. ๐ I think this is kind of separate channel/forum, but not one of the official channels. But not sure how to describe it better I'm still kind of noob in discord. ๐
Am I only one or does others see it too, that there's a dog on this ducks face. ๐
Ahhh okay, but not everyone can join?
Great photo man!!
No everyone can join, it's one of the "forums" in the discord. If you go to #981874992880963594 you can see all the different kind of forums with different topics that don't have their own special channel
Ahhh okay thank you, also a disc newbie๐คฃ
Great shots as always Antti! Do you just walk around in the woods for these or do you have a hide setup?
Thanks and both. Some are taken from the hide at my bird feeder. Others just encountered randomly or places where I think that I might find them.
Like those yesterday shots. Longtailed-tit and treecreeper are so-called lucky shots. Others are taken from the hide. Ok that woodpecker is quite random visitor so luck is also needed with the hide. ๐
slightly jealous of this reach
what lens?
That one I took with a nikkor z 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 @400mm.
And it is cropped quite a bit
ah nice
I can't wait to get a good tele, hopefully come spring
z is out of my league unfortunately so f mount will have to do
I'm thinking of eventually upgrading to a fx, something like D850 that will do what I want but retain value over the years
plus crop potential because nothing in this hobby stays still when I damn need It to ๐ซ
There are great f mount lenses. And there is a good amount of used ones available. I had a 200-500mm f5.6 and 500mm f5.6. The zoom version was good and the prime one was great. Crop sensor body is a great choice for wildlife but ff with high megapixels works really well also and is probably bit more versatile. ๐
Great shots!
An Atlantic Puffin was in my area today. Hoping it's still around tomorrow.
nice recovery and also shows the new lens can catch these guys in flight (had no doubts but still, tough to aim upwards with)
ignoring the weight on my arm the 500 f/4 felt easy for BiF, after handholding it upwards i feel like using my 100-500 today though. Benefits of having both lol
next time im just hoping i got the time to change settings prior lol, but it cleans the shadows up well enough
also a decent shot ive yet to edit (not a bird, but i can see one where this squirrel would be ) which with that darkness at 5.6, i cant imagine my zoom at f/10
Not that bad image quality. Considering that it is taken with ISO 12800.
What shutter speed did you use?
1/5000s
Impressive to get it that sharp at 12800!
Thanks! I was curious as I usually go to around 1/4000.
That might have been enough for this jay. But I have noticed that for small birds taking off relatively close range even 1/5000s is bit too slow.
Bigger birds further away that can be tracked smoothly 1/3200s or even slower might be enough.
Sick photo @green meadow
Looks really good. ๐
Going through my phone I found a bunch of my old bird pics, early 2022, this would've been the winter I got my tele I think
some of them are honestly not bad, would've been cool to scrounge up the raws and apply my new editing skills but they're long gone
I seemed to have a hard on for blue saturation and sticks obscuring my subject 
just wanted to share :)
Australia moment
Thank you for making me laugh this morning, at the very least. Sorry about the birds though ๐ญ ๐
I think most of these are great and seemingly only limited by their resolution
my bee eater photo from this week, not as cool as yours though @mint warren . couldn't seem to spot any couples - will be doing the little trail hike around this area soon i think... hopefully less fires and snakes and more birbs
Could be passing through and hasn't paired up maybe
Once you find a nest area it'll all be pairs
yeah I think so, the three I saw were all along the road which isnt ideal for them but like you said, maybe there'll be a nest area on the trail somewhere
If you check local boomer bird pages they'll have a spot they usually go too
Will be hiking tomorrow with the birding group(20 people). Hoping to get some pics of the raptor migration.
Grebes look so Goofy from the front
Nvm i failed to get any keeper pics
But damn they(the raptors) gets reallly high up in the air
Chilling in a chair and put some bird feed up on that tree stump, hoping to get some birds
Maybe should get a camo net or a hide for this
birds are unlikely to immediately find it it's better to keep putting food there for a couple days before setting up for pics
Yeah I would, but it's my grandma's garden so I only have 2 days here
But with sound tapes they came out and showed themselves really well
Only not on the treestump, only got 1 Robin there when the light was already pretty much gone
But got some really nice shots of tits and a wren, so overall i'm happy
The robin
Honestly not horrible for 6400 iso, love topaz
white balance lookin magenta I would check that
You're right, should be better now
can I see the shot of the tits?
I found bird photography boring before
And now it's the thing i love the most ๐
I want to take really good pics only using my Sx40 HS
And one day buy a better camera
Didn't edit them all yet
Went out this morning and got a wren perching up on the log, was showing itself really nice for a couple of minutes
Also had a common firecrest visit very briefly, was already gone before I could get decent shots
Man those autumn colors r crazy beautiful
Yeah the colors are amazing atm. Got some even better and cleaner shots today, can't wait to go edit those
Do you guys have any success with upscaling? asking here because I feel like birds are relatively more complex of a subject to upscale with ai and such
A relative wants a print of my eagle but I want to send them something bigger than 8x10 at 180dpi ๐ญ
topaz can upscale with mixed results
I was wondering if super resolution would work
1st one imo
Yeah I think that it might be the better one. But on the second one I like the snow on the foreground and feather patter on the birds back is visible more. ๐ค
both are great bro XD
but first stands out a little more
thanks and thank you for telling your opinion. ๐
I do agree that the snow in the foreground looks good in the second one, but the overall scene of the first one is much more appealing. Feels like it has more of a story of the bird scouting where to fly to next going downstream.
Catch of today
He came back today and actually showed himself nicely for about 1,5 seconds
this shot is really beautiful!!! is this in the hague?
Thank you! Not in the Hague but in Zelhem, tho I think firecrests aren't impossible in the Hague, especially at the edge of the city
agree
I much prefer #1. Iโm not a fan of the snowy foreground, to me it just looks like a gradient mask. But the pose looks way more majestic in the first too
Pretty birb. Last photo looks like itโs cut out for a meme
swans aren't very common here. sadly i only had a 20D on me
if this was eye level wauww, but still a great shot!!
are these raw files?
yeah its a frequent problem
the pond has a steep bank so I cant get much lower without being in the water 
ahh that sucks, but still great shot man!
much appreciated! I've been trying for awhile to get a mallard doing the whole wing shake thing and yesterday those two did it almost simultaneously and I almost dropped my camera in excitement 
yeahh it's a great feeling when you finnaly get the shot! ๐
Seems like 2 females to me, going of my limited research
The grey head and white eyering seems to be a pretty defining female feature
Maybe @green meadow knows?
Not sure. I'm not familiar with that species.
EABLs are very common where I am. I am 98% sure those are both male with that vivid blue https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Eastern_Bluebird/id
comparison with my own shots, female left.
was just popping in to say my last few days shooting have been uncertainty if a bird was actually in a tree, or if it was the wind, taking a bunch of shots anyway, then playing ispy for a bird that may not even be present
seems like yall are having better luck ๐
The females can have very vivid blue in the wings as well. Left is male, right is female. But the males are also blue on the head which is lacking in that picture, and the very noticeable white eye-ring which is present in females, but much less so in males. I also think the colours are pushed pretty far in @sinful flint's shot which makes the grey and blue seem more vibrant and blue than it actually was.
Little chickadee landing on a tree
yeah could be just oversatuation making it appear male, the more I look at the bottom one the more it looks female
Yeah, like 99% sure the bottom one is female. Not super sure about the top one, but I think it's also female, considering the still pretty clear gradient from blue on the body to gray on the wings
My camera can't shoot in RAW
but if you mean "Raw" in the sense of unedited, yes, i didn't edit
I see thanks everyone for the input
I've searched up why eastern bluebirds fight and they usually fight male vs male or female vs female so I'm curious if it's a male and female why they fought
im actually so confused im looking at the raws and i cant tell
I mean, they both have black heads
lookin at the raws im only more convinced they're both female
Mmm okie
after careful review i am 98% sure these are both birds at least
i appreciate the input!!
He blue
Blurb
Burbl
Blirbo
couldn't get close enough but spotted a thrasher havin a bath ๐
Same with me and this Hoopoe
how lovely! are these common where you are?
Apparently! I'm currently in Tenerife and I've seen a few of them.
Yeah hoopoes are quite common there
Lovely birds, saw a lot of them in Romania this summer, sadly didn't have my 100-400 lens yet back then :(
That quality is honestly not bad for 10x zoom on a phone
Phone camera's really keep surprising me
I also just realised I was using the 16:9 crop instead of the 4:3 full image resolution
new wallpaper drop
fucking leaf ruined my otherwise perfect shot
i've got photoshop's gen ai if you want me to get rid of it for you
I was going to try smart removal or wtv in lrc but I wasn't sure how it would handle something nuanced like that, also my gf kept asking about her new phone background so I didn't want to mess with it too much lmao!
not at my PC atm but here's a (hopefully) full res upload if you want to mess around with it, I'd be curious of the results
https://postimg.cc/k2zC7C4W
Yeah smart removal should work just fine
Wouldve been an even better pic when you were lower down
Alex, how is your hunt for the Kingfisher going?
Havent been out in a while actually, maybe I'll go back next week
Didnt have the motivation anymore after not getting anything after 20 hours lol, but since I'm about to start a new job I'll need to go out again a few times before I have much less free time
every single time people say this I have to tell them again that where I shoot there's a 70ยฐ bank lol, mostly I don't have the time to kneel over it and put my camera over the water in live view mode ๐
Yeah I get that, it's not super motivating to put so much time into it and then walk away with nothing
Hopefully you'll have better luck soon
Thanks๐ I hope so too haha
https://postimg.cc/G8mhy6Mn - grabbed video of workflow example too. not perfect but then can follow up with other adjustments like shadow / noise, or just regen smaller selections
one thing I found it struggles with the most is dark noisy areas, doesn't easily mimic noise / contrast patterns
first ever kingfisher today!! unfortunately too far away, but hopefully frequency illusion kicks in now that i've seen at least one ๐
great timing. last one looks like it's tossing it up in the air like a snack food ๐
That was later with a bee
The other 3 are him regurgitating a pellet
I'm back at my potential new kingfisher spot to check if they are still here, dumbest idea ever because I'm still a bit sick and I went here by bike so I have no clue how to get back home without dying lmao
Can only stay here for 1 hour max before it gets dark so that makes this even dumber
bruh he's still trolling me
Just packed my stuff and went back towards the street when he flew past me
Atleast now I know theres atleast 1 still there
Damn, you're really one of the least lucky people I've ever seen
Lmao yeah but I was only there for half an hour anyways today
Yeah but you already put in like 20+ hours no?
Yeah at a different lake, I think there was too many other spots where they couldve landed so that didnt work
Today I was at a small creek where at least one lives, I think I just wasnt there long enough
Yeah that sounds like a smart strategy, less possible perches so more likely it will land on your perch
Ohhh so cool!
Great pic, looks like its in captivitiy tho? Background doesnt look very nature like for some reason lmao
thanks, and yea it is in singapore's bird paradise, i go there very very frequently
Bird watching
dump with the same preset, anyone have feedback in terms of colour?
You could still mask and denoise the background a little more probably
But yeah, denoise has gotten so good these days. Im pretty comfortable shooting up to 12.8k iso on my a6400 and then just run it through Topaz
Some gorgeous framing and layer depth in this one blimey
Thank you! Yeah I'm really happy with it, I usually like clean backgrounds a lot more but it worked amazingly well for that pic
I know what you mean, but unless the bird's doing something interesting a clean background can make it a boring photo to me. Birdy has some nice contrast with the foliage
Thats true yeah
and all that I've state above, explains why I'm a trash birb photographer
because i fail to do it hahah
I was amazed by how well the colors pop for some reason, thats without any additional saturation
Me too tbh, in most of my pics the birds are just perched because I never find good spots for in flight pics etc
I think I found one today tho, if I go there with my tent I think I can get some nice pics
A looot of foliage but if I do it right it could work
Tons of small birds there
yup same, I struggle to find time to hide from birds for longer periods of time. I do enjoy doing walks to spot and shoot though
Hoping the crested Tit lives there too or atleast visits often, ive seen it there once a while ago but theyre pretty rare here
Yeah I dont really like walking around tbh, have had way more success with waiting
Apart from the kingfisher ๐
That mf
I'll get him one day
Yep, it won't take me long to get that way, especially when I have the 200-600 around my neck 
Yeah waiting just gets you way closer to the birds with nicer perches in general
Crested tits are beautiful, hope you have some luck today!
Ah I wont go there today bqcsuse the weather is pretty bad, super cloudy and dark again, maybe tomorrow morning tho
Yeah the weather has been pretty shit lately, very cloudy and a lot of fog
Yeah super annoying
Maybe second one. But I would probably crop it differently. ๐ค
Something like this?
I agree, thanks for the suggestion! much better without the leaves
Rather unusual Spot, tons of different tits so hoping to get something nice even tho the spot is lowkey terrible
You can try playing some sound tapes to get them closer. Works pretty well with tits from my experience
Kinda unethical tho
Not supposed to do that
In what way is it unethical?
In some cases it is yes
But the majority of birders use it on a very regular basis
the use of bird calls is controversial, really just up to however the birder feels about them.
personally, I don't use them because it feels like i'd be disrupting their behavior having them come look for something that's not there, etc.
then again, I have feeders in my yard which some also consider unethical
just depends how you feel about it
Yeah there's definitely cases where it's unethical. But imo just using it to get birds closer when they're already there is a fair use case. As long as you don't sit there blasting sounds the whole day.
mating calls are certainly unethical but I feel the impact of those mixed call recordings where they're just kinda yelling at eachother is negligible
personally the people at the park spread bird seed about anyway so I'll just toss some in the area I am in and hope they land on branches nearby
it gives them something actual so I don't feel that strange about it
mostly the same 3 types of birds anyway
pro tip most lil songbirds go nuts for sunflower seeds
Yeah the type of calls does also matter. I only using the allerting calls since it just makes them curious and they come check it out. Pygmy owl calls also work well sometimes to get them to come check since it's not a predator to them.
Yeah sunflower seeds and insects work really well
Yeah thats why I dont do it either
autumn duck
Out looking for bearded reedlings. Have some decent pictures already but god damn these buggers are hard to photograph
They just stay in the foliage the whole time and move very fast
So much going on at the lake today lol
I feel this. Everyone posting Kingfishers in creatures and I'm still over here with my one blurry bigfoot like photo
Lmao
Lemme see one of your photos
first ever sighting a week ago
i mean if you combine our photos we almost have 1 quality photo lol
Yeah lmao ๐
Did you use AI to blur the background?
The best quality image i've ever seen 
right, we on it, move over national geographic
I'm also still praying one day a kingfisher gets curious about me when I'm out T.T
Lol
Alright Im back again, I think I come on here like once a month haha
Here are some recent shots from me
I also just got a 500 F4, which I have been loving!
A dream...
the dream is a d500 under $1.5k ๐
The real dream is a Z8 under 3.5k ๐
wait a decade or two until we inevitably loop back to "hur mirrors kewl"
or, wait until midwinter and scoop up those ehrm
"birders of age" estate sales selling $8k of gear for $1200
pro strat right there
Yeah I still need to wait on my tax returns anyways till I have the funds for a Z8 + 180-600
But I'll just be scouting for good deals, sadly they're really hard to find in the Netherlands, even the second hand market is super overpriced
Yeah. Gotta wait for the old guys to sell their kgs of gear for cheap, and migrating to an om-1mk2 or something light.
I think I'll try to photograph birds again tomorrow
Iโve been happy with mine, heavy but very handholdable once used to it
Fl seems perfect
grabbed a Tennessee warbler passing through.. they hover like hummingbirds!
https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/626441759
Lifer Eared Grebe today, super happy with this shot!
Gonna pick up a Z8 body later this week. Can't wait to have bird eye autofocus
Gonna wait a bit with getting the 180-600, untill black friday has been and I have my old gear sold
I thought the A6400 had good autofocus
Yeah the autofocus is nice and fast and pretty damn accurate. It just doesn't have a bird eye autofocus mode. So im having to work with spot and zone autofocus which is less than ideal in quite some situations
Oh ok
And also in general I wanted to make the step to full frame and a higher burst rate camera
z8 is a big jump have fun
that's awesome. i'm now over here comparing the a6400 to the d7500 trying to justify my own jump to a z8
Yeah it took some time to justify my jump as well. Until I got 3.5k in taxes that I payed too much for back, pretty easy call at that point
hey yeah that makes sense, money already assumed gone, might as well! I'm excited for you
finally got a decent shot of a red-bellied woodpecker today, sad I lost the tail but still, new best
the trick is to cope about mirrorless "not being all that" until you can pick one up and then memoryhole your previous statements 
Birb
Can confirm, birb
I like how oversaturated birds like this exist and then there are mourning doves who are just a blob of beige
You should see white winged fairywrens
Of course we have our share of greyish, brownish, greenish indistinct birds might be a thornbill or something idk types
How tf did you manage to get so much details?!
They come pretty close
I had to actually back up a few times when they were too close and it wouldn't focus
Ohhh
What lenses did you use?
Sigma 150-600 c
And what camera?
Eos r7
It's a Canon.
I'd probably say in lands in the area of "budget enthusiast"
Probably one of their more popular bodies atm
Like sigma 150-600?
Yes actually
Oh ok, sorry but I use Nikon and I donโt know much of other brands
sigma 150-600c here too!
I love it, but I also upgraded from a tamron 70-300 soo doesn't say much lol
will edit more later
I donโt get how the quality isnโt as good as yours even if the distance from this robin was really short
Same for this one. Can someone help me?
which nikon body is that, and what lens were you using?
Im using a sigma 150-600mm f/5.6-6.4 and Iโm using a Nikon D3500 for the camera. I can also give you the information of the shot:
- ISO: 800
- aperture: f/8-9
- exposure: 1/3200 of a second
And I was around 4-6 meters from the bird
to me the quality between yours and bungins looks pretty close. zoomed in makes it look like yours is crushed by compression though. you shoot raw?
shoot raw if you aren't already, take advantage of LR denoise, and practice sharpening
also getting closer is usually best, optically or physically, I shoot basically 200mm all the time, I crop a lot less than I used to
embrace your inner snow white
Yeah
Some species can stay really long, as long as there is some kind of open water it's fine for them
Luminar Neo
Crazy pics
That have any sort of AI noise reduction?
What?
Does Luminar Neo have AI noise reduction
Wdym with โembrace your inner Snow Whiteโ?
Spot sharpening with masks also is handy to do
I use it all the time. But the quality is still less than your pics or otherโs picsโฆ.
Maybe I have a basic camera? I know the 80% of the quality of the pic comes from the lenses, but a part of the job is still thanks to the camera
Maybe, D3500 is Nikons entry level model right?
stand still and talk to the birds lmao
a lot of the time I'll be sitting on a log and they'll come within my focus distance,
or come play around me, etc etc
Yes
Thatโs cool ngl. But, since I donโt have much time cuz of the school, I prefer doing โhunting photographyโ (I go around and photograph what I can find, without waiting behind a bush, ecc.).
that's what I do too
however you are unlikely to get close, most of my shots go as follows
see bird -> approach-> snag a few pictures -> spook 'em-> position myself good to get a clean, frame filling shot of the area they were just at -> wait 2, 3, 5min depending on bird -> they come back, shoot away
it works very well
Thanks for the help. Iโll try it as soon as I can
Seconding this. Just walking around all the time and always chasing after the birds is not gonna give you the best results.
I did the whole chase the birds like they owe you money thing for a bit and then started getting like, double the hits just waiting around specific areas
kinda like you're supposed to lol
take notes and observe where you tend to see them, and start going there instead of wasting time walking around 60-70% empty brush, especially if you're short on time
Yeah, staying still for just a few minutes will get you much better results. Was really amazed when I tried that for the first time and it worked wonders
d3500 is fine tho imo, you lack some of the "newer" af modes I think like group af? the 4 points that you hold over your subject & it focuses between them, and can potentially be limited by the 5fps burst but that shouldn't stop you, depending on your lens you could be pushing it past the "sweet spot" for sharpness, my 70-300 is sharpest around 200 so that's where I stay, my shots are noticeably less sharp past 250 even, which could be why you perceive a "lack" of image quality
if you want too, post a full resolution image of the first one or another one you feel the settings and focus were correct on, will be easier to see anything obvious that could help
When i edit with luninar neo, the photo goes from raw to jpeg, so all the pics i edited with luminar arent in raw. I can still send you a pic that wasnt edited with luminar
wait
now that i noticed
i cant even send a raw image here cuz it is too heavy. I thought this one was raw but actually no
Yeah no thats normal, you need to convert them to jpeg or png before sending
Yeah. Nowadays i set my goals before every trip. Will i be sitting and chatting with other birders and wait for a good shot of 1-3 species(usually a nest, a hunting ground, or something similar). Or just go walk around and take pics of more birds.
I usually get better pictures when waiting on a known area. But going around helps identify potential areas to revisit.
Also changes my bag contents lol. I will bring a folding chair and other stuff when waiting.
But leave most stuff behind when exploring.
will the quality be the same tho? I mean the visual quality. Ive never understand it: even with luminar neo, a pic that must have weight around 20MB, after editing on luminar neo, it goes down to a single MB. I hope that doesnt influence the sharpeness or the details
idk specifics about neo but that's definitely compressing something
my raws are about 20-25mb depending on image and usually go down to 10-15mb
check your export settings
I would look for banding and other such artifacts that's a surefire way to tell
so does the quality get shrinked?
how?
you should be able to do it directly on export
or check preferences
you'll have to see I'm not familiar with it myself
yeah, essentially the algorithm gets rid of data in the image it deems useless
I like Lightroom classic for its exporting in particular, grants you a good bit of control in naming and export settings
How do I achieve this gritty "real life"/wild look, idk how to describe it, all my bird pictures seem to be kinda like fairytale esque, kinda soft, but not detail soft if that makes sense
-# thanks Hans Roemer
like that
seems like some clarity stuff
I donโt get the point sorry
Me neither. Can you give us some example what you are trying to achieve?
this image is the one I saw that sparked interest
let me try and find an equivalent one of mine on my phone one sec
let's go with this one
not sure how to explain it but it's a bit more of a "soft" look
less harsh? idk
If you mean that the bird in your photo is bit softer. Then there is lots of possible reasons. Like motion blur, missed focus, softer lens or something related to editing the picture. ๐ค On this specific picture there is some softness around birds eye. I think that it is because you/camera has focused little bit behind it.
or in front of it...not sure
I mean the color in general, not really optical softness, even in my sharper images it's the same
I more meant the harshness of the feathers and overall feel of the image
like if you look at this one the underlying blacks are much more pronounced especially on the breast etc
Then it is probably editing style and contrast related things. Try adding some texture, dehaze, clarity and maybe sharpness. Or then it is lighting difference. I think that your picture is taken at overcast day and that one above on a rather sunny day. But I'm not totally sure if we are talking about same thing. ๐ Also if your photo was under exposed, then blacks might be too dark and lack details because of that.
I was just about to say it's probably a combination of lighting and editing, exaggerating clarity & sharpness was definitely going in the right direction, finally snowing here so next time I'm out I'll get some shots with that in mind, the snow works wonders for scattering light so that should help brighten things up
I'm totally having motivation issues. Because days are short and it constantly cloudy and not enough light to photograph. It also feels like there is nothing to photograph either. ๐ฅน
I can relate. Also school stuff is keeping me bussy when there is still light outside :c
Hope you'll find motivation tho cuz I love your pics 
not the greatest example but lightroom has these three settings which give some "crunch"
I know here we can only talk about bird photography, but I have a question and most of the times they donโt respond me on the question chat. Can I ask you if this editing is too much?
Editing looks fine to me, colours are natural
Would maybe get rid of the bright spot on the top left, doesn't really add anything imo
The โbright shadeโ you mean?
Is this better?
Ngl I'd try getting something out of those shadows and see how it looks
Yeah a little bit more detail in the shadows on the deer itself would be nice
I made the pic like that cuz it was half covered by a branch
So if I make more details in the shadows youโll see the branch
its moody, I like it.
Depends on what you want to do with it but I think it looks good as it is
You can mask just the head of the deer and play with the shadows there
And what do you think about this one?
Shit
Im already complaining about the 5 degrees we're getting here
I miss the winters with some good snow tho, haven't had that in years
Fking climate change
nothing too crazy just a duck but i like it
aperture really blows out the background, need to use it like this more
cute mallard
11/10
we already got 3 inches
started snowing a week ago 
want some snow?
this is probably the best place to ask
you lads have any glove recommendations?
my ski gloves barely keep me warm and I also have to fumble with controls like it's my first time 
also... maybe a balaclava too
I love ducks
one of the cooler flicks from the day
cold as hoth but all in all I enjoyed the first outing of the winter season
this one I really like too
it reminds me of an OG pic of mine that I took when I first got started and still love
I have been using Viking gloves for the last 2 years for skiing/snowboarding and I have no complains
But viking is generally good for gloves so you can chceck them out
someone doesn't get winter 
Only summer, rainy, and mosquito season here 
Send us snow
Might just move to Australia just for the birding photography honestly
Wdym by that lol
the birds got their own cameras
In Australia it's birds photographing you, not the other way around
Forget it, it's political stuff
a family member asked me to do portraits yesterday at 10C, I almost cancelled the morning of b/c it was too cold til I saw your post about birding at -15 ๐
I'm glad I can be the "Well if he's doing it I can" metric for somebody 
yeah they are very amusing to me
ignore like 90% of that photo besides the bird. It was taken as a joke Car photo
one of the ones above i recall followed me because i pointed a camera at it lol, smart birds too, prob figured i had food or something
I've noticed a lot of them in Yellowstone like that one I posted have tracking units on them
It's pretty interesting
interesting to see theyre a bit different looking in your area too, feel like everywhere has their own version, where im from we had ravens instead of the crows
chickadees are similar
one im seeing around me in the city is prob an american crow
some day i want to see a magpie but i hear they attack lol
i havent seen anything like that before, although theres been reports of marked birds in the area like song sparrows, usually just on their leg
lots of spots taking care of birds and wildlife in general here, theres a spot i could drive to to see rehabitilated owls and things like that, which just somehow get into trouble be it a window or worse, different from a wildlife sanctuary as its free and all
they just take care of the birds and release them when they can (doesnt matter if its a pigeon, or a golden eagle)
Most likely for research, pretty cool
I see enough birds with rings around there legs, but never seen one with an actual tracking device
nah
it's irrefutable proof that birds do not exist
well, as we know it
they are cute lil featherdrones made by the feds
those calls you hear?
modulated data transmissions. Literally just a giant LORA network
so funny
It's a lot of different stuff including that, again don't wanna derail
Nice one, Hawk Owls are so cool
I almost ran over a Barn Owl that was hunting at night the other day
Glad u didnt haha
Yup. Took me only 1 hour to find. I knew one location
I wish i had a better cam
Don't we all wish we had better gear?
How is this shot? Handheld 5.3kg lens ๐คฃ๐ญ Idk if i like it or not
Yea it was only on the highest trees ๐ญ
Its a hawk owl
went to a wildlife reserve today, don't think I got any usable closeups but the hoards of birds were a sight
This is how I feel about our wetlands reserve. It's just hoards and hoards of the same fucking duck
what's funny is i was actually looking for ducks but got this ominous cloud instead
so that's where all the birds went
Leave some birds for the rest of us next time please
Considering the bird only takes up a small amount of the frame something like this is what I would do
Keep the nice purple foliage
Yeah I second that
You could also keep it a little bit wider than Flo's suggestion to make it a bit more of an environmental shot
i like last one the best for some reason, though the framing doesnt follow any rules
I don't actually know any of the rules so ๐ญ
I would go with a very wide crop. Keep the bird on the right side and sth like a 16:9.
One downside is the green foliage on the left side drawing a bit of attention away
I also quit like this version. Maybe just a tiny bit more space for the bird on the right side. But otherwise quite nice
yeah i can feel my eyes keep dragging to the bottom right
I would go with this crop. Looks the best to me
I like the first on more, because the foliage on the left and bottom create some layers and draw the eye more to the bird. It feels more natural and intimate, because you show more of its environment.
Tried shooting a bird in 1/4 today i hope the results are good. Its a bird that stands still alot near water
Tried to make the water moving in the pic
White throated dipper
Nice
Dippers are such cool birds
Diy monopod sleeve/pad
. hopefully helps for tomorrowโs birding session.
Idk. Might need to buy a proper one, or get one of those pipe insulations.
bicycle bar tape might work well
Currently using some random 25x25x3 foam i found.
Kinda helps. Might try doing it to my tripod too.
managed to capture 2 dippers standing still at 1/4 shutterspeed 600mm f5.6. thoughts?
1/4 wow
oh nvm this was 1/8
Still impressive lol
My slowest bird attempt was at 1/15 on a tripod, with a 2 sec timer
this was my setting @broken mantle
prime birding temp
Is it good?
the foliage is a bit distracting but it's cool!
old birder put me on to a couple owl hotspots and some cooper's hawk locations

same park I frequent too
very happy
Whoa
it's been -15 or lower the past few days
I am a very happy boy

lucky
Ok so this always confused me
I usually use group af since it is a bit more natural/accurate for my use
however how does nikon "point" autofocus work? surely it doesn't just focus on that one point right? I always see people recommending that for birding but I can never seem to get focus
I want to try and get some better BIF images, especially takeoffs but group af always seems to slightly miss, a lot of the time 3d tracking seems like it would work but other cases there isn't enough contrast for it to grab the right subject
Idk lol, on my D7200 i use the small cluster AF.(the 5 or 9 points). And pray. 
Reading up on it in the d7500 manual it does seem to only be for stationary subjects where you specify where to focus https://onlinemanual.nikonimglib.com/d7500/en/13_focus_01.html
No clue how on earth that's recommended for birding unless I'm missing something
This weather sucks. Even on 600mm f4 i have to use 1/500 6400 iso
Same here. Sucks when i just got a new lens
Took ~20 pics of the local blue eared kingfisher
Then BAM a storm
Got stuck on a small roofed seating area for 2 hours
not the best birding trip. Havenโt copied out the files.
Now iโm reconsidering my long trip 23-29 dec. the birders there warned me of the slippery terrain and bad light till next year.
Another areaโs birding guide outright declined clients due to the bad weather for the next few weeks.
Sucks living in the north lol
Atleast winter time is ass
The local marketplace ran out of vanguard alta rcxl(rain cape). Thats like the only rain cover for large lenses available here.
Might need to diy one from a cheap raincoat.
ornament
adobe pls add shift focus point slider 
I think that in these photos it is about motion blur rather than missed focus...or both. What shutter speed you used?
Seems like most picture have the wings perfectly frozen so I doubt motion blur would be a problem there, considering the wings are the fastest moving parts
Wings are also some what blurry so I'm quite sure that there is also motion blur involved (specially pictures 1 and 2 maybe 3). 4 and 5 are clearly out of focus. ๐ค
I have noticed that when shutter speed is fast enough there can be some details visible also on the wings. In this one the shutter speed was 1/6400s. 1/4000s might be enough but preferably faster.
have you guys seen https://lightroom.adobe.com/learn/discover/sm:animals ?
just found out about it, not exactly relevant to only bird photography but think it's neat, can view other's editing process
Hmmm yeah you have a point. But even then, the wings are moving so much faster than the body of the bird that I doubt the head would suffer from the same amount of motion blur as the wings do
be a lot cooler if I liked any of the edits people did on that site lol
yikes
1/3200 or 1/4000 iirc
I believe I cranked my iso up & was shooting at 1/5000 for a bit as well, I'll check metadata when I get home
yeah you have to kind of dig and find the ones that do quality edits. searching for a specific bird then following the rabbit hole down works pretty well
I really like the feature where you can post your own and allow others to remix it and reimagine the edit.
they're all 1/4000 actually
Precarious perching
Then it is probably just missed focus. Best possibility to get sharp fly shots of small birds is, if you find spot where you can photograph them taking off/flying side ways and not towards you.
Is it a good shot?
After i took the picture, i saw that i could have placed the bird further to the right
But idk
hell yeah could use some editing tho
Well I think I would crop it tighter. For me there is too much negative or dead space on the left side and above the bird. ๐ค
Tip 1: 1/40s isn't fast enough for photographing white-throated dipper in flight and some slight motion blur will be visible. On the other hand it is possible to keep ISO at very moderate level with that shutter speed. ๐
nah perfect photo
throw some filters on it, give it some wanky name and you've got a beautiful Instagram pic
Could pass as รกrtistic
Some crypto farmer did buy a banana taped to a wall for like 6 million so....
This piece of art is on sale right now. Just 1 million $, so it is kind of a bargain. ๐
1 million yeetcoin right?
managed to snag a creeper, of course when I wasn't looking for it
Cool bro
eastern phoebe today
epic
thank you!
i know it's been awhile lol but I just got anther bluebird pic, and I now agree with you about those 2 bluebird in that pic being female. it's def the white eye ring
Damn that was quite some time ago lol
borb
harsh sun can really just change an image lol, still like this skatebird though
I would murder for some nice light
been overcast nearly two weeks straight
Same here, we haven't had any sun for 8 days straight, which is the longest period since like 1990
Same here
apparently there will be sun in friday but it'll just go back to rain/overcast after that
clipped
wing
firstish time using dynamic point af
anecdotally my keep rate seems a bit higher for the take off ones
i'm kinda sad the face was just out of focus on this one
Yesterday I got some quite nice fly shots of great tits and blue tits. Like these ones. Pretty nice poses. But there wasn't enough light...so ISO 25600. ๐
noise or not those are fantastic
Thanks! ๐
Auto ISO failed me there, bit lower would been enough. Most cases there were only snow as a bc, but in that case there were also some trees so ISO jumped without me realizing it or having time to adjust the exposure compensation. ๐
mind sharing your technique for this kind of shot? they're phenomenal
Snow is the only time I really don't like how Auto ISO does things
I usually end up turning it off now if it has been snowing.
I had some peanuts in a box on the ground and birds hesitated on landing there. So I was lucky to take pictures while they flew for a while kind of "stationary" bit like hummingbirds. So I was on the ground and took photos like crazy. ๐ Shutter speed was 1/2500s and af had just enough time to focus to the bird.
I should probably also stop using it in the winter. ๐ค
When birds looks like this then you know it is cold out side. ๐ฅถ
I love borbs
I didn't know what borb means, but it definitely describes that type of birds quite well. ๐
both 600mm f6.3 pf and 100-400mm f4.5-5.6. But at my bird feeder I think I like the zoom lens better because of how versatile it is. Borb was taken with the 600mm and flying ones with the zoom.
and also closest focusing distance of the 600mm is not ideal when birds are in close range.
forgive the atrocity known as phoneposting images
I want to get this printed, how do we feel about the composition?
I feel like centered might be the way but I'm not sure
I'm pretty sure I have some crop space to play with since it's like 10mp
Somehow, I often feel a certain antipathy toward portrait orientation. I really struggle to get the composition to look good to me. It either ends up feeling too tight or having too much empty space. If you're planning to put it on your own wall, the best approach is to make it in a way that looks good to you. After all, you're the one who will be looking at it the most.
love all these shots! i've banned myself from taking anymore photos until I get through my leftover culling from 2024..only like 4000 more to go ๐
Thanks dude
I wanted to crop it as less as possibile since the quality isnโt the best.
Man, first day with the Z8 and the 180-600mm and I'm in love. You can crop in so much and still get great quality
Noise performance also seems very good compared to my old a6400
Btw @green meadow am I doing something wrong or does your Z9 also give pretty underexposed files while using auto iso? In camera everything looks fine, but when I drag the files into my editing software I had to bump the exposure a stop or more for some reason
Could also be something with my editing software but idk
I haven't noticed that kind of issue. Could there be some Picture Controls on which affect pictures on the back of the camera but not raw files?
And congrats on the new camera.
speaking of z
I haven't looked much into them, but I found a second hand Z6 with 50k shutter for about $100 more than I'm planning to get my 150-600 for
I haven't used Z6 so I can't give any insights, but look out for some reviews to determine if it matches your requirements. I have heard that first z cameras didn't have great af, but not sure if that is the case and did they got any updates to fix that.
I have th picture controls set to auto but I think it's my editing software
Since it also did some weird stuff with white balance and stuff
Hopefully it is just some simple setting issue and you'll find out what's wrong. I'm sure you made really good choice with that camera and lens combo. Can't wait to see more results with those. And really promising start by the way. ๐
consensus seems to be z6i is a waste ever since the z6iii dropped
I think I might go through with my 150-600 purchase and continue with my current body, and maybe by spring see if prices drop a bit so I can pickup a new/refurb z6iii w/ ftz
So my savings plan is currently set for z6iii
however I'm already getting some fomo from bird af+nearly 2x mp on the z8
however off sale the z8 is nearly 80% more than the price of z6iii off sale
Yeah very happy with the combo, even with the limited shooting in very bad weather today. Hoping for some decent weather next week since I'm free and on a birding island the whole week
Tough choice. I heard the Z6III does pretty well with birds on the animal eye autofocus settings, so that shouldnt be a huge problem. But the 45MP of the Z8 is very nice
yeah, I'm decently versed with the ~20mp format since that's what I've used for most of my time shooting
I think I might go for the z6iii and save the rest for z glass
all I really want is muh af modes and the epic pre release capture
pre release in itself is fucking awesome for anything action related
even though it's just a second, I've had some shots where I've missed by less than one 
I'm sure everyone has
Sadly it's only in jpeg
But in the right conditions it isn't the end of the world to shoot in jpeg
WHAT
have I been lied to
Maybe just misheard is all. Donโt think any Nikon does raw pre capture yet.
ah unfortunate
probably yeah, I just assumed
hopefully more of a software limitation than hardware
I can't see why it wouldn't be
Yeah it is in all models jpeg only. And I have lost all my hope that updates would enable it to raws also.
I think they would already have given it to us if it was possible. ๐ญ
Lately I have noticed that I get better results shooting raw and by using my own "precapture", so that I start shooting before bird takes off or something happens.
I have a feeling they are done with feature updates
Yeah probably preparing for launching new models of current cameras.
and saving new features to those.
Yeah I wouldnt hope for raw precapture coming to the current models with a firmware update
It would be very nice
But I dont see it happening
One can hope at least
so I'm going to get a large format done of this for a relative-
should the small sharpness dropoff of the claws be an issue or am I just being a paranoid pixel peeper
those are my main concern
(150% crop btw lmfao)
does it get any more paranoid? I don't think so
I gotta remember to stop down a bit
heat of the moment and all that jazz 
the age old "shallow focus or am I zooming in too much"
Pixel peeping is great fun but doesn't lead anywhere. Well not entirely true it probably helps learning techniques of getting sharp photos. But sometimes even blurry photo can be much better or interesting that super sharp technically perfect photo. So it is good to remember that sharpness isn't everything. And that being said I'm a helpless pixel peeper. ๐ I'm quite sure that after you get the print you will think that it is not sharp enough (at least I have looked every of my larger prints that way). But after you hang it on the wall and look it from normal viewing distance I think it will be fine. ๐ ๐
Love the blue-tit photo and those out of focus leafs ๐ and robins are really nice too. ๐
Thx, i havent been out to photograph anything for a while now. And didnt have any luck last time i tried either lol. Iโll be trying again soon now that the Christmas break has started
Facebook knows the exact type of content I like to spend time on 
Swan and dipper
Finally some better light today. Really happy with these ones
Also absolutely love how goofy the bill of the northern shoveler looks
Little egg shaped bird
Man y'all are making me jealous, weather here in germany is still terrible
It's still not great here, super windy and a lot of rain. But luckily enough light and sometimes the sun coming through the clouds a bit, so good enough to go out and use the new gear properly
Nice, I can maybe go out on tuesday again but not sure yet
i had a bad snow storm in my photo lmao (had some sunlight beforehand though), excited to go out again today or tomorrow
looks sunny today though
snow is really fun with birds, been waiting for it
I'll gladly give some of ours to you. It has been snowing almost every day this week. I'm already so full of cleaning my car from snow every morning. And I won't stop snowing until march or in worst case in may. ๐
I'd happily take some of yours! Really thinking about takin a winter photography trip to Scandinavia in the coming years.
I recommend doing it. I'm sure itโs an amazing experience for someone who isnโt so used to snow. But when you have to deal with it year after year, it becomes a bit of a burden. I have to say that Even though Iโm complaining about winter, Iโm still happy that we have different seasons. Also the worst is over now because the days are starting to get longer, little by little. ๐
kudos to everyone, but especially with in flight photos, I've been staging my usual spot and still most of my pics are of birds sitting still because I fired too late..gonna blow out my shutter in no time
got a bird in basically "perfect" focus today, almost too an odd looking image lol, was nice to see all the birds at home still around. Bluejays, nuthatches, chickadees, goldfinches, crows and it looks like theres either a robin nest or a bluejay nest nearby now
ive yet to see the mourning doves but they tend to arrive later in the day anyway
nest is easy to spot now but in the summer prob not as much, my guess is a robin (unless they have extremely large baby chickadees)
eye focus would never
i think the bird may have seen me
this lens performs well in the trees, first time ive used it around home so lots of experience with the zoom lens there, havent denoised at all today
lucky duck
I've yet to see a bluejay with my camera
theyre my favorite birds along with cardinals 
got both at my apartment area which is nice, lots of bluejays at my family home area though
got the red guy at a flower garden
im on the hunt for an owl always though, everyone has some bird thats just tough for some reason lol
There's a pretty reliable spot near here for owls apparently
I check it every time I go now
wanna trade locations? 
What lens do you usually use anyway?
Depends on the day but Iโll use rf 100-500 or the 500 f/4
500mm seems to be the common fl
Owls here are far and few although lots of eagles
ah nice
I'm excited for my first big lens
70-300 is limiting at times 
Yeah itโll be nice the more range you get, prob best to have access to 500/600 over higher/lower
500 f/4 I just got in sept, while heavy itโs almost been my main lens since
I find an image like this is a good idea of what it can do
Wonโt be super close like 800mm, wonโt be super wide like 200mm
If I want super close I just put on a tc, depending on the zoom + body might not need that though lol, assuming itโs a zoom lens
Yeah I don't know if I'll end up getting a tc for the tamron, Maybe if I decide to go the nikkor route but 200-500 is strange range. From what I've heard the IQ is negligible but the Tamron G2 has more snappy AF which is more important to me, plenty of people have also noted 200 can be too much up close sometimes and 500 can be just a bit less than needed, I'd prefer to have more range even if I drop edge sharpness at full 600
I can always just stop up, I don't plan on using it in low light, however the iso performance on d7500 is quite good from my experience and consensus
full 600 on apsc is like 900 anyway, literally 3x my max right now
even 500 is pretty much 2.5x my max, supposedly quite sharp there anyway
Iโm using ff myself so 900mm is like double what I have
I prob wouldnโt go above my max which is 700mm but I do want a 2x tc occasionally
@gilded yarrow I'm also giving the Kingfisher a go these coming days
Turns out one visits the little stream next to my moms house pretty regularly
Sick, I hope you are more lucky than I am
I'd like to think it's almost impossible to be more unlucky then you 
Really hope I'm not gonna spend 20 hours without even seeing one
Yeah true 
Almost 4 hours and had one fly by
Calling it a day, already too little light
Found a new and probably better spot for tommorow, hoping there's more light tommorow
Average kingfisher experience
I'll go look for them again next week in a different spot where I got my 1st kingfisher pic ever, not expecting anything tho since thats a bad spot lmao

