When you start to link more and more nodes to a page, the pages that link to a page get buried deeper and deeper, therefore they should be at the top
#Pages should be at the top of Linked references
stoic shoal
undone abyss
Hmm, that would improve UX when page references are needed more often. That might not be the case.
Why do "Pages" have a section under "Linked References" and the rest is just cluttered on top? There could be a new section "Journal" under Linked References, which can be colapsed, but there can also be an option for the order. Enabling all use-cases.
stoic shoal
Hmm, that would improve UX when page references are needed more often. That migh...
I dont know if "Journal" would be appropiate since that section shows blocks, no matter where thet are from (they can be from other pages not just Journals). But I do like the idea, perhaps the new section could be called "Blocks", and you would be able to collapse it
tardy elm
I think all the blocks can still be under Linked references, and a new section to be added for Linked pages.
undone abyss
A link on a page is also a reference.
undone abyss
Hmm, that would improve UX when page references are needed more often. That migh...
Turns out everything under Linked references is a page, even the journal pages.
@stoic shoal You can have the other pages on top by sort group by page name instead of the default journal date.
stoic shoal
Turns out everything under Linked references is a page, even the journal pages.
...
Thats not what I have in mind, since I dont really have many blocks inside pages that arent Journals. What I want is to either be able to move Pages that are linked to this page at the beginning of Linked references instead of them being at the bottom, or be able to fold all of the blocks linked to this page
undone abyss
@stoic shoal i don't understand. doesn't that do exactly what you want? the pages are on top now