Node embed vs block embed

[jade cliff]

Not sure if this is intentional, but there is a difference between ref counts between MD embeds and DB embeds.

In DB version, the node reference itself is counted, so you always see a counter with at least 1 when embedding a node.

In the MD version, a block reference on the same page didn't create a counter.

I think the old MD behaviour is cleaner, when I'm referencing a node, I don't need to see that very reference in the counter, I'm rather interested in other references.

Might go against a principle that an embedded node should appear the same in every context though.

There are some other UX issues with references too.

It's cool that highlighting one of the references highlights the others too. But when I e.g. click Del here, it deletes either the nodes below (if expanded) or the text content of the node (which creates a blank page error). It seems the only way to remove the reference is to right-click on the link icon and delete it from the context menu.

In the MD version, deleting a block ref only deleted that references and no content from the actual block. I think most people rather want that when deleting?

Finally, editing references does not feel great.

When I hit Enter and Tab below a regular node, I can start typing right away.

When I do the same below a node reference, the experience differs whether the node is collapsed (it's just blank and I don't know what happens) or expanded (I see the nodes below the reference but cursor is not focused, so need to click before I can start typing).