#Trump Indictment III - Jack Smith: Return of the Fed-Guy
335 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
The third indictment of Donald J. Trump — this one for trying to steal the government of the United States. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.1.0_1.pdf
💖 149
If you cannot see Twitter stuff, here's a PDF for you
Indicted 3: Oh Hell No!
"America Decides" reports on the latest developments in special counsel Jack Smith's investigation into alleged efforts to interfere with the peaceful transf...
Watch live at 6:00 p.m. ET: Special Counsel Jack Smith to Make a Statement
Likes
476
Retweets
287
For future reference.
@potent abyss 45 Page Indictment for the 45th President 
The press conference has begun.
And it’s over, short and sweet, not taking questions of course.
Jeffery Clark is my guess for one of the Co-Conspirators.
Seems plausible
https://twitter.com/froomkin/status/1686502259583016960
Co-conspirator cheat sheet
- Rudy Giuliani
- John Eastman
- Sidney Powell
- Jeffrey Clark
- Ken Chesebro
- Steve Bannon*
Damn, I was stuck on #5.
On June 4, 2014, her nomination was confirmed by a 95–0 vote. https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1132/vote_113_2_00173.htm
roll_call_vote.xml
https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1686456824000593920? Marcy with the right uppercut.
I hope someone who has interns is pulling the quotes of all the Republicans, starting with MItch McConnell, who said they voted against impeachment bc the proper remedy was prosecution.
Likes
7050
Retweets
1775
Better get to work on my title for the Georgia indictment
Willard Hotel War Room. Surprising we haven’t seen indictments of Stone, Kash Patel and the others in DoD. I wonder if they flipped.
Trump Indictment IV: A New Case
I'd been hoping for a Return of the King/Return of the Jedi vibe for this one, but it happened before I could think of something that rhymes with "king" or "Jedi"
Trump Indictment III: Revenge of Smith Or Return of Smith?
Mine was a reference to Sharknado, which honestly suits better this whole debacle 😅
You're in charge of this now
Yeah this is like, Snakes on a Plane or Cocaine Bear shit
This is how I become a power mad despot.
Trump Indictment III - NYT Gonna Need A Bigger Font was my best
Trump Indictment: Third's the Charm
Jack Smith: Return of the Fed-Guy
Trump Indictment III - Jack Smith: Return of the Fed-Guy
Trump Indictment IV - A New Dope 🍑
Boom! Lock that in.
The fourth indictment will be in Georgia
God it's so hard to keep track of all of the Trump legal news. Is there a calendar of all his trials and court hearings somewhere?
How about Georgia related indictment puns.
Trump Indictment IV - The Devil Comes North to Georgia.
I feel like I need a spreadsheet just to keep all of his legal drama straight
I need more red string. 😉
Trump Indictment IV: He Gets His Phones Tapped Down In Georgia
It's going to be a mad primary for sure
March 25th 2024 - New York (city) hush money trial start date
May 20th 2024 - Florida (federal) classified documents trial start date
? - D.C. (federal) January 6th indictment
? - Possible Georgia (state) indictment
Georgia is expected this month iirc, they are setting up fences and such rn
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis says she will announce charging decisions by September 1 , 2023.
If I recall, he doesn't even have to turn up to the NYC one.
Not sure about the others.
Correct for the civil ones. His attorneys are grateful for that blessing. 😂
Not to derail the thread but may as well post this https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4131756-fulton-county-sheriff-says-threats-have-been-made-against-himself-district-attorney-leading-up-to-potential-trump-indictment/
Presumably in the criminal ones he can waive his right to be present?
One would assume his defence plan is to just be elected again and be able to tell the courts to go and do one.
Yep, i think procedurally he’ll have to be there for a few key moments. Its up to the judge. Not sure a judge would allow it in most cases. He raises a lot of money from rubes for these moments so who knows. 🤷♂️
Likewise on the derailing point lots of indictment news today!. NY AG is ready for trial ($250 million) civil case if successful these bans the entire trump family from effectively running a business in NY State https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=Mh7T6YNL3ysJbWUq2rffTQ==&system=prod
I wonder if Ginni Thomas is sweating right now. 🤔
Fox News, atleast on the Ingram hour, is going with the "free speech has been criminalized" and "Joe and Hunter Biden are the real criminals" angles
I can send screen caps later when I get my laptop, some of the chyrons are very funny in that they are more Twitter cope updates. Current one is "Follow the money on Biden family corruption"
I would like to see that but I'm not getting my hopes up for her.
And pence continues to defend the guy
Well, they had good reason to worry about pence's safety
Sitting on the Docket of GA [awaitin time]
I would love to hear recordings of Pence conversations that day and especially to former VP Quayle.
Just saw on CNN, identifying the first five of these, leaving the sixth unknown (unless I misread, all the same names as this)
Ingraham, like Harlan Crow likely has a secret room of “memorabilia”
Number six could be Tom Fitton.
I remember there was an episode of "Freaks and Geeks" where Ben Stiller played the vice president's security detail, and he was having a midlife crisis because "no one's ever tried to kill the vice president"
I think of that whenever I read about Pence on 1/6
Ha! I love that show. I forgot about that part.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/donald-trump-jan6-jack-smith-rudy-giuliani-john-eastman-1234798826/ defendants love this one weird trick!
I'm predicting that "Hang Mike Pence" is going to make a comeback
https://twitter.com/BrianKarem/status/1686513807122718720
Future proves past
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/08/01/us/trump-indictment-jan-6/ff970098-98bf-5ecf-ad1f-b3e8922239a9?smid=url-share "Trump has been summoned to appear at the federal courthouse in Washington at 4 p.m. on Thursday, according to the special counsel’s office. Magistrate Judge Moxila A. Upadhyaya will preside."
I really feel we have lost touch with how close we came in 2020 to authoritarianism enforced by nationwide, city-by-city state violence. The forces behind that effort remain widely influential in US politics and their return to power in 15 months is entirely plausible.
Likes
2503
Retweets
790
plugging my favorite, time-tested Trump crystal ball reader again. great thread on Jack Smith's meta-strategy https://twitter.com/tomiahonen/status/1682736116296822784
Jack Smith Carpet Bombing Thread/1
I think I can see how Jack Smith plans to run the prosecution of Trump. I all this his carpet bombing strategy. Let me explain
In Jack Smith 1, Espionage, Florida federal - he only charged 2 people, Walt Nauta & Trump BUT foretold of more
Likes
10252
Retweets
2965
We're gonna need a bigger discord
A disturbingly large number of flag officers are sympathetic to Trump.
Is this Tomi account for real or is it parody?
lol. it's for real but he has an insane sense of humor. he's a retired telecomms lawyer who apparently drinks whiskey, reads trump's legal documents and tweets
Weird. It seems like a Brian and Ed Krassensteins/MuellerSheWrote/etc level klout seeking account.
yeah he makes outlandish claims and tweets a lot. I wouldn't bet on his speculation but I enjoy reading him to get a comical, blistering take on the latest Trump legal events
Say what you want about "Let's Go Brandon" but as a slogan it was definitely an upgrade from this
Dang it! If you have a NYT subscription https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/08/01/us/politics/trump-jan-6-indictment-2020-election-annotated.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare you'll get notes as well.
oooo no paywall https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/01/us/politics/jack-smith-trump-indictment-investigations.html
the mandatory
false alarm, no?
Breaking News: Donald Trump pleaded not guilty in court to charges that he conspired to remain in office despite his 2020 election loss. https://t.co/2irxCAE4PP
For anyone interested: Trump's Jet tracker in BlueSky https://bsky.app/profile/trumpjet.grndcntrl.net
McCarthy: I can say the same thing that Hillary Clinton says about her election that she lost. I can say the same thing about the DNC who said it about the 2016 race. But were any of them prosecuted? Were any of …
💖 125
Man, 0 to 100 kmh in 25 seconds.
Whataboutism
McCarthy is a big fan of Stalin’s favorite technique. Tu quoquo
He’s still angry that Rep. Swalwell got his 🐐 in public.
not even, it's such a totally different thing
Another myth you may encounter: "they have to prove Trump believed he lost". Based on Ken White's podcast, because the prosecution is mainly for defrauding the United States, the bar is lower, essentially "he did not actually 'know' he won in the way he represented to the Senate with the false electors etc".
You could compare the crime to selling a shiny piece of brass you found on the street as gold and even paying a bunch of people to sign fake certificates of it being chemically tested gold (the fake elector scheme). When behind the scenes everyone around you (including jewelry experts you have relied upon before) told you it isn't gold and that you shouldn't be selling it as gold. In this case the prosecutor doesn't have to show that you believed it was brass, only that you didn't actually have the claimed certainty of the material and defrauded people, in part by making false statements and forging documents saying it is certainly gold.
which gets funny with the statements he is recorded making, on a fox segment tonight they had to dismiss Trump telling Pence he was "too honest" as Trump being loose with words. Because we all tell people they are being too honest when we are doing things totally legit in our minds.
you know amongst this entire indictment
I'm surprised they don't even indicate Roman as a co-defendent
He's the one responsible for the "ballot stuffing" video and a host of other disinformation based content
You could make a really strong case adding him in considering he was up to a bunch of really shady stuff that we really only see in malign influence campaigns.
I mean with a fatal flaw like that Trump won't even have to pull out the reverse Uno card in court and say "No, You!".
as funny as this is, with how serious this might proceed, small things like that may actually present an issue
Well this one is literally just taking literally an extremely common figure of speech. No judge in USA is going to take an issue with that.
https://web.archive.org/web/20230805005341/https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/08/04/trump-criminal-cases-prison-secret-service/ imagine the message it sends that coup leader gets to stay home.
Have you seen the filing floating around - a link and not just a screenshot?
Screenshots of the whole doc at least https://twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/1687650039932256256?t=IDzdAhTLUudw4HeLVyRhEQ&s=19
Thank you!
Not so much the judge but a jury trial if it goes that way
Judge will see past it yh
Can't readily find a link to the filing atm, but brain no works properly
So insurrection is a crime now? 👨💻 Remove personal information off the web with Incogni with code LEGALEAGLE https://legaleagle.link/incogni ⚖️⚖️⚖️ Need a lawyer? The EagleTeam can help! https://legaleagle.link/eagleteam
Welcome back to LegalEagle. The most avian legal analysis on the internets.
🚀 Watch my next video early & ad-free on Ne...
Trump is such a dork with his specialized nicknames
At least he’s not Aldi Mike Pence. 
Nobody should be putting Mike Pence's name on Aldi. Aldi did nothing wrong.
Lidl didn’t either. 
Judge Cannon’s latest ruling. Trump Document Trial. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.100.0_1.pdf
This ruling shows Judge Cannons inexperience and favor towards Trump. She’s demanding the prosecution state why its using an out of district grand jury. Trump and his confederates have been explicit about exposing identities of the grand juries members. Judge Cannon is trying to help him in that regard. Smith and crew seem to respond to this stuff quickly. Only took three hours to ask the Judge in the Coup Indictment to push back on his call to action against Smith and co.
This part is interesting of the Special Counsel's latest "The district court also found reason to believe that the former
President would "flee from prosecution." J.A. 1. The government
later acknowledged, however, that it had "errantly included flight
from prosecution as a predicate" in its application. J.A. 281 n.1. The
district court did not rely on risk of flight in its ultimate analysis." on page 5. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cadc.39513/gov.uscourts.cadc.39513.1208541751.0.pdf
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23904723-doj-proposal-for-trump-trial-date DOJ request for January 2, 2024 four to six week trial. Insurrection Case (Indictment III)
I think the timeline of this is going to be interesting. Jack Smith (prosecutor) said of the January 2 date request, "would vindicate the public's strong interest in a speedy trial"[1]. That "speedy trial" language invokes the Sixth Amendment of the US Constitution[2]. However, it's really important to note: the public gets no right to a "speedy trial" under the US Constitution - that right belongs to "the accused". If the accused says they need more time to evaluate the charges and evidence and mount a defense, there's no constitutional argument that I'm aware of which would argue that it needs to be faster.
1 - https://www.axios.com/2023/08/10/trump-trial-date-2020-election-fraud
2 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
https://www.congress.gov/bill/96th-congress/senate-bill/961#:~:text=Speedy Trial Act Amendments Act of 1979 - Amends the Speedy,require commencement of trial within Speedy Trial Act of 1974. It’s really up to Judge Churkan. The People have an overwhelming interest in a a resolution to these crimes. He can appeal the Judges decisions all he wants. It’s just going to put the higher courts on notice and if they rule in his favor for delay the outrage is going to activate a democratic backlash at the ballot box.
Summary of S.961 - 96th Congress (1979-1980): Speedy Trial Act Amendments Act of 1979
Before I retire, looks like things are happening for a change! r/t ehiggins https://twitter.com/hugolowell/status/1691645991483498797
that's a lot of info I surely wish Twitter wouldn't keep if I used it actively
Hmm, giving false statements to a jury is probably not a good thing
Federal election interference trial will begin on the 4th of March 2024.
Entirely possible he’d be convicted in Georgia Case the time this one starts.
Especially if the Georgia (USA) case starts in October in the 23rd.
The prosecutors in Georgia have asked for it to also start on March 4th.
Oh I must be behind. I was basing that off the Reuters reporting from the 24th a few days ago. https://www.reuters.com/legal/georgia-prosecutor-wants-october-start-trump-election-trial-filing-2023-08-24/
Prior to Trump and his co-defendants’ surrender last week, Willis initially proposed a March 4 trial date preceded by arraignments the week of Sept. 5.
“In light of Defendant Donald John Trump’s other criminal and civil matters pending in the courts of our sister sovereigns, the State of Georgia proposes certain deadlines that do not conflict with these other courts’ already-scheduled hearings and trial dates,” Willis wrote in a court filing this month
Looks like the March 4th date was from before your article, although who knows, as the article says they’ll probably specifically arrange it in order to not have overlapping cases.
Don’t do (multi-jurisdictional) crime, if you don’t want to do the (juggle multiple court cases) time.
I’ll dig through the DA filings in the court records. My impression she and the Fulton team was ready to go. The case is straightforward too. If any the defense wants it pushed back. Some of the indictees I believe are still in detention as far as I know not having posted bail.
I believe one of them yea, Harrison Floyd.
Apparently Chesebro’s trial is set for October 23rd.
A trial date for one of Trump’s co-defendants in the Georgia election interference case, lawyer Kenneth Chesebro, has been set for October 23, 2023 after Chesebro asked for the process to be expedited
To be fair, it may not be as colossally impractical as it sounds. With all these cases, purely from a security shitshow standpoint, they are probably going to be happy that he turns up as little as possible/perhaps appears through video link.
If he doesn’t have to appear for most of the hearings, and it’s just his various teams of lawyers, even if they end up overlapping, it may not really matter in terms of the practicality of campaigning.
Elon v. Smith v. Trump 🪒🪒🪒 Get 100 free blades with your purchase of a Henson Shaving razor with code LEGALEAGLE: https://legaleagle.link/Henson ⚖️⚖️⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! https://legaleagle.link/eagleteam
Welcome back to LegalEagle. The most avian legal analysis on the internets.
🚀 Watch my next video early & ad-free ...
Documents 40 to 46 are just randos trying to intervene in the case.
https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/53FDEC7E544D232E85258A29005F24EC/$file/23-3001-2016705.pdf these Judges rap sheets are something! Especially Judge Henderson!
🔴 Judge Rao (50), Scientologist, Clarence Thomas Clerk, FedSoc Trump Appointee, abhorrent writing and rulings. 🔴 Judge Katsos (59), FedSoc, Trump Appointee, former WH Counsel to Trump, big fan of child torture.
🔴Judge Karen L Henderson, FedSoc, probably the worst of all….and the other two judges are terrible (79 yo) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_L._Henderson
👀 Scientologist and judge?
It’s unclear. It appears she is both Zoroastrian and converted to Scientology.
Tl:dr these are three incredibly compromised judges with massive conflicts of interest in thrall to Donald Trump who all hold deeply reactionary and disturbing rulings on many cases involving Trump and his confederates.
They all have deep ties to Peter Rutledge, Leonard Leo, and Mark Paoletta and FedSoc and seem to be Clarence Thomases personal acolytes.
don't know the author's credibility 🧂 tho he does observe that a well-known terrorist prosecutor has joined the ranks. fascinating turn.
https://twitter.com/TimInHonolulu/status/1702417043780501533
https://twitter.com/TimInHonolulu/status/1702417045751812557
- Trump's deranged Megyan Kelly interview ranting about having right to do whatever he wants with top secrets may indicate something big is coming. I believe he's been trading secrets with foreign powers likely the IRGC to get out of his Suleimani Fatwa. IRGC is a terrorist org.
Likes
8473
Retweets
1936
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/28/raskin-mar-a-lago-trump-documents/ has him as part of the investigation from the start it seems. But now he is added as prosecution then?
Due to filing error last week, the govt's actual proposed gag order in USA v Trump (DC) was not filed. It finally was just now (at my request). It's attached. ...
/1
https://t.co/RsR04FU1n0
Likes
863
Retweets
287
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmRFys0V7xg soo, another gag order coming in tomorrow? Let's see :)
MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on a massively critical hearing that is set to take place in federal court in Washington DC on Monday where Federal Judge Tanya Chutkan will asses whether a gag order should be imposed on Donald Trump based on his threats. Special Counsel Jack Smith is ready.
Visit https://meidastouch.com for more!
Support...
Chutkan also warned she will order sanctions against Trump if he violates her order, whether or not prosecutors request them.
pretty significant move.
They're not on the best of turns
And as expected, he's turned on it being a witch hunt again and that biden ordered it.
God what an echo chamber..
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/111246010120912412
See also: Old Man Yells at Cloud.
Shouldn't this be under any reasonable gag order?
that's the thing though. There is a gag order for this one afaik
you could definitely say this is witness tampering I guess
trying to grab the link but god this guy is a serial shitposter
exactly where my head is at, too.
I am not a fan of cameras in the court room generally, but it would have been really interesting to see him in the stand today right before he stormed out of the courtroom for the Trump Org Dissolution Trial in Manhattan in a huff and threw his temper tantrum. Also having the judge grill him about his latest gag order violation too.
It has been asked apparently
But it's all slow going
Need help keeping Trump's problems straight? So does everyone else:
#1091113297589309450
https://discord.com/channels/709752884257882135/1116515685170958346
#1136050746593382512
#1140013258175156275
https://discord.com/channels/709752884257882135/1167472810466213898
Arguments in the gag order appeal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngUhSD35DoA
Monday, November 20, 2023 9:30 A.M. USCA (Live-Stream)
Judges Millett, Pillard, Garcia
Case #: 23-3190 USA v. Donald Trump
Thank you for watching, for more information, please visit https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf/Content/Oral+Arguments.
sounds like this panel is gonna keep the gag in place
thats nice as long as they actually have consequences for breaking the gag
aside from "pay us"
right
They will absolutely appeal to scotus if they don't win though
Just a few seconds after this, one of the judges raises her voice at Trump's counsel and tells him that her question was hypothetical https://youtu.be/ngUhSD35DoA?t=2399s
Monday, November 20, 2023 9:30 A.M. USCA (Live-Stream)
Judges Millett, Pillard, Garcia
Case #: 23-3190 USA v. Donald Trump
Thank you for watching, for more information, please visit https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf/Content/Oral+Arguments.
made me jump
Guess who's breaking a gag order again? https://mastodon.social/@MissingThePt/111460197456496283
This directly emphasizes why some other, less enlightened(?) countries would simply “disappear” someone Trump. We can only hope our legal system is strong enough to eventually hold him to consequences.
Instead of complaining, he should be grateful he is in court and not on the scaffold.
Ahh wrong thread
Breaking: DC Circuit panel rules unanimously that lawsuits against Donald Trump for his Jan. 6 speech and related acts can proceed, holding that Trump did not show that they should be dismissed under presidential immunity. https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/A3464AEB2C1CB89985258A7800537E73/$file/22-5069-2029472.pdf
💖 58
https://www.democracydocket.com/cases/washington-d-c-former-president-donald-trump-indictment/ gag order reinstated for the DC case
Judge Chuktan has largely put former president Trump's D.C. case on hold while he argues for immunity. She halted "any further proceedings that would move this case towards trial or impose additional burdens of litigation on Defendant."
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.186.0_5.pdf
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24234728-smith-reply-to-scotus “The public interest in a prompt resolution of this case favors an immediate, definitive decision by this Court. The charges here are of the utmost gravity,” new filing
Amusing that Trump's appeal seems to have spent a lot of time arguing why the government couldn't appeal in this specific situation (despite the government obviously not being the appellant)
https://mastodon.social/@Teri_Kanefield/111633449406623740 has a breakdown of it
Yeah, this is his “The Founders Wanted a King and Monarchy” Defense.
Something like that
I’m sure Justice Thomas is furiously typing up a concurrence on how that Trump’s position is “deeply rooted rooted in the Nations history and tradition” 😂
I thought the "immunity" thing had been quelched already
ah no, it's just that there's a bunch of precedent set which don't really support his claims accordingt to NYT for instance; https://archive.is/m6xwG
It's mostly that describing the day's speeches as "official actions" is really tortured. The office of the president does have criminal immunity (so for example if the president orders a military operation that results in deaths, he is not guilty for a murder conspiracy like an ordinary citizen would be) but that obviously doesn't apply to the president doing something unrelated
The specious argument:
... no current or former president had ever been criminally prosecuted for official acts. That unbroken tradition died this year ...
Is a multi-car pile-up of deception and misconception. Seems more a PR attempt to shape public opinion (i.e., self-victimhood and outrage) than to form a credible legal position.
Is this derived from the DoJ and OLC memos?
Multiple times, by lower courts https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/chutkan-denies-trump-motions-to-dismiss.pdf and https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/trump-jan-6-immunity-order-dc-circuit.pdf in this case in particular.
yeah, I had it in my head that the supreme court had said something as well but that was definitely misremembering
For sure. There are 44 federal charges and 47 state charges, all of them felonies across dozens of Civil and Criminal cases. It’s a-lot to parse https://www.justsecurity.org/75032/litigation-tracker-pending-criminal-and-civil-cases-against-donald-trump/
SCOTUS has only denied cert.. Meaning they opt not to hear his immunity defense now but reserve the right for consider it in the future. It doesn’t set a binding precedent and the lower courts ruling only applies to the geographical jurisdiction of its ruling. Some pundits and legal scholars are saying this denial is only temporary (suggesting they will rule imminently). Generally, no one knows where this is going to land with SCOTUS 🤷♂️
https://bsky.app/profile/nicholasgrossman.bsky.social/post/3khcot6ga4z2c succinct summary of all of this.
Bluesky Social
If you enforce the law in good faith as written, then we'll try to abuse it in bad faith, and you wouldn't like that, so don't enforce the law.
That's extortion, and the only reasonable response is a hard no.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490070/245/united-states-v-trump/ latest Speedy Trial report
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cadc.40415/gov.uscourts.cadc.40415.1208583920.0.pdf Absolute Immunity Response from Special Counsel Jack Smith
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68073028/united-states-v-donald-trump/?order_by=desc Appeal of No Immunity to Election Obstruction Charges by Donald Trump. Amicus Curiae brief by Paul Dorsey.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240105120744/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/05/donald-trump-january-6-supporters-behind-joe-biden-impeachment wasn’t aware The Guardian referred to the events and lead up to Jan 6 as a Coup. Refreshing honesty.
Judge Pan is better at her job that D. John Sauer is at his.
he really lost it when challenged on his impeachment line of reasoning.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/special-counsel-questioned-witnesses-2-rooms-fbi-search/story? Trump still has classified documents this whole time. Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20240202130819/https://abcnews.go.com/US/special-counsel-questioned-witnesses-2-rooms-fbi-search/story?id=106826552&cid=social_twitter_abcn
I...think(?)...that this is the right Trump trial....?
TL;DR: Judge Tanya Chutkan postponed the case indefinitely while the appeal about presidential immunity is decided.
https://www.axios.com/2024/02/02/trump-trial-postponed-election-fraud-claims-jan-6
If that belongs in Trump I or II, let me know. It's not the Goergia nor Colorado case....
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656595/united-states-v-trump/?page=2#minute-entry-377424198
MINUTE ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: The February 9, 2024 administration of a written questionnaire to prospective jurors, as set forth in the court's 130 Order, is hereby VACATED. In addition, the March 4, 2024 trial set by the court's 39 Pretrial Order, as amended, is hereby VACATED. The court will set a new schedule if and when the mandate is returned. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 2/2/2024. (zjd)
This isn't a major development in the case, rather a bowing to reality as the DC Circuit Court of Appeals is taking longer than anticipated to rule on the immunity question. Until they complete their ruling, the original case cannot proceed. The major impact is going to be the domino effect in the timeline because a trial date that was set for March 4 is no longer feasible, so when will it happen and how may the updated schedule to this case, or the other cases that are held up by it, be impacted - and how will it play into the politics of the election (obviously.)
II is for the Special Counsel and Documents and III Special Counsel Coup criminal cases, you are in the right place second things related to Judge Chutkan.
I thought Trump II is the Florida SD classified documents case? The one with Judge Cannon. The OTHER Special Counsel indictment….
Ah yeah good catch:
#1091113297589309450
https://discord.com/channels/709752884257882135/1116515685170958346
#1136050746593382512
#1140013258175156275
https://discord.com/channels/709752884257882135/1167472810466213898
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.277.0.pdf for the response from Jack
Rick Perry has basically disappeared but he is in the circle with Trump with respect to all of this. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1R82LY/
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cadc.40415/gov.uscourts.cadc.40415.1208593677.0_1.pdf. archive https://archive.ph/a6yup
“For the purpose of this criminal case, former President Trump has become citizen
Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant.But any executive
immunity that may have protected him while he served as President no longer protects
him against this prosecution.”
also
"We have balanced former President Trump’s asserted
interests in executive immunity against the vital public interests
that favor allowing this prosecution to proceed. We conclude
that “[c]oncerns of public policy, especially as illuminated by
our history and the structure of our government” compel the
rejection of his claim of immunity in this case. See Fitzgerald,
457 U.S. at 747–48. We also have considered his contention
that he is entitled to categorical immunity from criminal
liability for any assertedly “official” action that he took as
President — a contention that is unsupported by precedent,
history or the text and structure of the Constitution. Finally,
we are unpersuaded by his argument that this prosecution is
barred by “double jeopardy principles.” Accordingly, the order
of the district court is AFFIRMED."
Next stop SCOTUS on the appeal if done by Trump prior to February 12 (which he will). This kicks it back to U.S. District Court Judge Chutkan for now.
Yup. Let's see how quick SCOTUS handles it
that's a pretty potent statement.
It took this appeals panel 3+ weeks to make this ruling plus we have hearings on the ballot case coming up imminently at SCOTUS this month
Another good one from the ruling, via Chutkan, “Every President will face difficult decisions; whether to intentionally commit a federal crime should not be one of them.”
As Law&Crime previously reported, Trump argued in a Friday reply in support of his motion to compel discovery ... that he was “entitled to discovery and a hearing concerning selective and vindictive prosecution” to defend himself and, ultimately, dismiss the charges against him. As proof of his claim, the filing cited special counsel Robert Hur’s decision not to charge Biden for his retention of documents from his time as Barack Obama’s vice president. That decision came down to a number of factors, but chief among them was a publicly controversial claim in the 388-page report that said Biden’s “poor memory” precluded him from breaking retention laws. Notably, Hur also underlined that Trump’s alleged offenses were far more serious.
A legal pundit commented on the differences between time in office vs out of office wrt retention of those papers. If I can find that again, I'll post it here.
Yeah one of the pieces of evidence is a handwritten noted by Biden about strategies to convince President Obama to exit Afghanistan. I'll find it and post it, it came from Wheeler. According to Hur that is 'top secret'. So like I said earlier notes about a FOB in Afghanistan vs secretly selling nuclear weapons secrets to an Middle Eastern autocracy are not the same. Hur's actions are rotten to the core.
I believe this article relates to this topic given it's part and parcel are what Hur's baseless accusations are https://oldgoats.substack.com/p/surviving-bidens-brain-freezes
There is a strong possibility that the documents Biden had were actually declassified by Trump as well. It's part of the bog standard declassification process. Wheeler discussed it.
I will take prop bets on Hur's nomination/appointment to the Attorney General Cabinet position in the event of a Trump win in November. Quid meet Quo. 🥴
Special counsel Jack Smith strongly refuted Donald Trump’s attempts to obtain information relevant to his classified documents case in a 67-page court filing.
“One particularly interesting part of the government’s response related to a suggestion in Trump’s motion that he had some form of security clearance issued by the Department of Energy that continued after he left the White House,” former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance wrote. “Smith eviscerates that claim in response to Trump’s effort to force the government to search for more evidence that such a clearance existed.”
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24427532/23a745-response.pdf Jack Smith SCOTUS brief in opposition to Trump's request for a stay in the presidential-immunity case.
Not confirmed yet, but Jack Smith is trying to reverse another decision by Cannon. In this case to unseal names of witnesses.
Trumps filed to dismiss the case, again. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490070/327/united-states-v-trump/ and https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490070/327/1/united-states-v-trump/ trying to insert nonsense into the record (Crossfire Hurricane) along with https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490070/326/united-states-v-trump/ that Jack Smiths appointment and funding is unlawful. and https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490070/325/united-states-v-trump/ Unconstitutional Vagueness. 😆
Chris Kise is going to lose his license to practice law over this nonsense. He's already been sanctioned on repetitive and frivolous filings.
CourtListener
MOTION to Dismiss 85 Indictment, Based on the Presidential Records Act by Donald J. Trump. Responses due by 3/7/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Kise, Christopher) (Entered: 02/22/2024)
CourtListener
MOTION to Dismiss 85 Indictment, Based on the Presidential Records Act by Donald J. Trump. Responses due by 3/7/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Kise, Christopher) (Entered: 02/22/2024)
CourtListener
MOTION to Dismiss 85 Indictment, Based on the Unlawful Appointment and Funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith by Donald J. Trump. Responses due by 3/7/2024. (Kise, Christopher) (Entered: 02/22/2024)
The judge overseeing Donald Trump's classified documents case has granted a request from Special Counsel Jack Smith to deny the former president's co-defendants access to the sensitive materials they are accused of concealing at Mar-a-Lago.
https://vxtwitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1765478735220732076
https://vxtwitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1765485592832344507
JUST IN: Judge Cannon says two amicus briefs filed by Trump-aligned lawyers "may be of considerable help" to her on Trump's motions to dismiss.
1 says NARA referral to DOJ was deficient: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.360.1.pdf
1 says Jack Smith appointment was inv…
💖 316 🔁 205
TL;DR
- Cannon declined to toss classified docs case
- Rejects claim that law used to prosecute too vague to be used
- Finding statue unconstitutionally vague would be "extraordinary" to dimiss)
- No ruling yet on Presidential Records Act
- Arguments on facts in dispute best left to a jury
- Doesnt merit a dismissal
https://vxtwitter.com/rparloff/status/1769363483080962345
https://vxtwitter.com/rparloff/status/1769363571610190320
https://vxtwitter.com/rparloff/status/1769363679454110066
https://vxtwitter.com/rparloff/status/1769363846899052588
Now that I’ve decompressed, here are some notes about Thursday’s USA v Trump hearing in Fort Pierce before Judge Cannon, which I covered for @lawfare . Some mixed messages but, to me, very strange. ...
1/19
💖 3.52K 🔁 1.02K
... She heard 2 motions to dismiss, granting one “without prejudice” hours later. But she also asked questions about a 3d motion, alleging “selective or vindictive prosecution.” Though the last is breathtakingly baseless, she is treating it very seriously ...
/2
💖 1.44K 🔁 166
... The selective/vindictive prosecution theory is that Trump is being treated unfairly compared to previous ex-presidents or ex-VPs who took classified docs or info home from WH. The obvious distinction is ...
/3
💖 1.3K 🔁 124
This judge 🤦♂️
she's trying all kinds of ways to jeopardize and sabotage the case.
seems like she's angling for plausible deniability in some of those absolutely daft moves, but it's too obvious.
It's insane. She's already gotten slapped down multiple times by the higher court. She's very inexperienced as a judge too.
I think it also creates an incentive for jurors to try and not serve as well. "Yes ma'am you are going to have to take this highly classified nuclear war/weapons secrets with you to your grave, you cannot tell anyone, even your spouse/partner/kids, we will prosecute you and track you for the rest of you life, would you like to serve as juror number #8?"
Pretty sure this will just get appealed, delaying it further
it's odd that after all the things she's still allowed to sit this case
Oh yes, Cannon’s goal is to run out the clock till after the inauguration. Procedurally she keeps violating basic trial rules.
I just think of any other national security case like this and the special treatment of the defendant. It really is extreme.
Just show the jury the papers. Our enemies already have them.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.407.0.pdf with archive: https://archive.is/0ukxw Quite a read, just created novel law out of whole cloth.
Or put forward grounds for her removal and replacement, also causing delays.
Trump asks for adjournment because his other trial is starting and would overlap with the trial regarding the documents
"has left"
Yep, he broke the attorney crime fraud exception threshold. Pretty big deal.
IIRC this is the third lawyer of Trump who has done this. Eastman was one as well.
The ruling by the judge, Aileen M. Cannon, was made in a bare-bones order that contained no factual or legal reasoning. It did not schedule a new deadline but erased the one she had set almost a month ago ordering Mr. Trump’s lawyers to file by Thursday a detailed list of the classified materials that they intend to introduce at the trial, which is set to take place at some point in Federal District Court in Fort Pierce, Fla.
This is probably not going to do anything, but it's nice to see people come together I guess. https://www.newsweek.com/remove-aileen-cannon-petitions-300k-signatures-1898410
"Federal law requires a judge to step away from a case in which impartiality 'might reasonably be questioned.' Given Judge Cannon's history and previous rulings in Trump's favor, her impartiality reaches that threshold," the petition said.
wishful thinking, but a laymen misunderstanding of how it works.
11th circuit court cannot be compelled to recuse her without proof of intentional judicial malpractice. the threshold for recusal is high, and despite her many questionable calls that only delay the trial, there isn't a smoking gun.
it's been noted here before that she comes close to the line without actually crossing it. there's a pattern, but not sufficient proof.
Hence the "this isn't going to do anything"
right. adding context to that very statement.
these sorts of petitions are usually feel-good virtue signaling without much weight.
No, it wasnt at a a criticism aimed at you. Apologies if it seemed that way.
It was direct response to the messaging in that article.
Ah k, I havent had my coffee yet :)
Soo
Judge Aileen Cannon dismisses the Mar-a-Lago case against Trump, finding that Special Counsel Jack Smith’s appointment is unconstitutional.
Unbelievable.
It's another sandbag effort as it goes into appeals.
Jip. Drag it out
Smith's office alerted the court over the weekend that it was seeking to file a nearly 200-page brief regarding how the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling regarding presidential immunity impacts the charges against Trump, who is facing four felony counts related to his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148.252.0.pdf the unsealed filing. Let the fun continue
https://abcnews.go.com/US/bombshell-special-counsel-filing-includes-new-allegations-trumps/story?id=114409494 If you like a news blurb
it's been called