#Hey folks so I ve been using a remote

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

wicked sable
lime shuttle
#

@wicked sable that's correct. There's been some changes in the architecture lately that removed that capability. I'll defer this to @timber lantern or @normal vessel since they have more context about why that was changed.

wicked sable
#

I know Solomon had a verison matrix concern and wanted to pack buildkit with dagger engine but I sorta liked the "do it at your own peril" way which worked at the time.

#

Actually, if I can connect to dagger engine remotely, that would be great too.

lime shuttle
#

well.. you can. cloak dev listens in a TCP port, so that shouldn't be a problem

wicked sable
#

I think I tried that in the past. Issue was that I can't connect to the Dagger engine via tcp/http. It seems to only support unix / embedded , I don't know if support for tcp/http is added?

lime shuttle
#

that starts a tcp server in the specified port

wicked sable
#

Awesome! I'll try it out, thanks 🙂

pseudo imp
#

Hi, it's been replaced by DAGGER_HOST

lime shuttle
#

@pseudo imp it's not the same thing. DAGGER_HOST is the host to our helper binary, not buildkitd

#

I also found about it yesterday 😄 things move fast here :sonic:

wicked sable
#

Yeah, I was previously running buildkit on a remote host but dagger engine locally

pseudo imp
wicked sable
#

I don't know how the file related operations will work anymore. Only one way to find out

lime shuttle
#

all the magic keeps working. No worries

latent ingot
#

if you connect remotely to cloak dev host file system access will not work. That’s why we’ve temporarily disabled the feature. Don’t connect remotely to cloak dev it won’t work the way you hope

#

we’re in a complicated in-between right now, but there’s a PR underway to fix it

lime shuttle
#

Yeah.. Solomon's right, I misinterpreted your "file operations" comment with something else

latent ingot