ivory vale
I would follow standard resume formats and conventions - not only is yours very far from typical (in a bad sense), it inhibits readability significantly. At places where there is manual review, your resume is more likely to get scrapped at first glance.
Is your lab researcher position an official position (paid or unpaid) with a school/lab? I would put it in your experience section if so
Your bullets just generally do not convey impact whatsoever. The separation by what seems to be project is atypical and difficult to understand, and the contributions within each subsection do not warrant it receiving its own section. Your internship with Lockheed Martin appears to be your most recent, but are your biggest contributions really just writing two matlab scripts?
I’d strongly advise you take the time to go through other resume forums and postings, going through the feedback given, and comparing your resume there, seeing where that feedback can apply to yours.
You are understandably a sophomore, and it’s awesome that you’ve had three internships at this point, but the market is far more competitive than what you seem to take it for. I believe you’re ambitious, and a lot more competent than you let on, but as it stands, your growth potential is not well conveyed through the results of your two internships. You will need to exhibit a lot more competence and growth through your resume to impress recruiters and engineers.