#Is a plant considered a pet?

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

green island
#

debate:

opal swift
#

no pets are only animals

#

it’s in the legitimate definition of ‘pet’

#

“a domestic or tamed animal kept for companionship or pleasure.”

native quiver
#

Yes but no, I consider my plants to be pets but if you wanted to be officially correct then no

rigid valve
#

No, even tho plants are alive they lack the sentience that animals do

opal swift
#

?

#

I don’t believe so

#

I mean there are many living organisms that are neither

jolly star
#

Nope

#

Plays are kingdom Plantae whereas animals are kingdom Animalia

#

They share a domain but that’s it

limpid schooner
#

saying that all eukaryotes are animals is,, very wrong,,

opal swift
#

Yeah it’s literally in different kingdom classifications

#

which is why I was thoroughly confused by what u were saying lol

brittle herald
#

i would post plant pics in a pet pics channel but other than that no, theyre not exactly pets

rigid valve
#

they're still in different kingdom classifications 💀

#

they even have different tissues and bodily systems

#

Humans are very closely related to chimpanzees but we're still not chimpanzees, ik its not a super accurate comparison because its species rather than anything broader but still

gloomy cedar
#

No but that doesn’t mean we love them any less! 😊

celest glen
#

what about pet rocks then

#

i need to know

stone crypt
#

i have a carnivore plant
soooo

rigid valve
#

I mean, I considered carnivorous plants but had decided against them being pets as well because on a fundamental level they're not rlly different from normal plants, lack of sentience and their carnivorous response is triggered mechanically rather than by choice

rugged stone
#

yes yes they r