#Legal attribution and EFIGS localization

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

strong bobcat
#

We will soon be releasing our title on Steam, Xbox, and PlayStation, and are in the process of adding the required legal attribution as outlined here: https://playfab.com/attribution/

We are localizing our title into the standard EFIGS languages, and were wondering if there are any translated versions of these resources available, or is an English-only display acceptable?

Credits notice:
"Portions of this program © 2023 Microsoft Azure PlayFab"

Splash screen label:
https://playfab.com/assets/img/attribution/game-attribution-tall.png
https://playfab.com/assets/img/attribution/game-attribution-wide.png

jolly comet
#

I must have missed the part where we are legally required to include PlayFab attribution? Either way on that page, it gives you clear specs to follow with a text label, that you can translate. It isn't saying you need to use their images.

fast ice
#

It doesn't seem to state where "powered by.." must be displayed. I would assume the splash, but it's not explicit. It is specific about the copyright location.

strong bobcat
#

The terms of service state:

"2.6. You agree to include a PlayFab logo in a prominent location in your Game, such as on the splash screen of your Game, and also to include our copyright and credit notice as is, without modification, on any "help" or "credit" screens. More details are provided in https://playfab.com/style-guide/ (or such other URL as PlayFab may provide), which by this reference is incorporated into the Terms."

The linked Style Guide redirects to the Attribution page.

strong bobcat
#

I realize we are not required to use those images, but we do not have the specified font in our title and would not have the precise control to meet the specified layout requirements. So, rather than recreate them ourselves as an image it would be easier to just use those assets directly. Of course if they need to be translated, we would need to make our own versions, but translating them would seem to contradict the "as-is, without modification" clause which is why I was asking for clarification.