#Functional Analysis
80 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Hey @visual echo, Thanks for sharing your math problem with us. While you wait for a Helper to help you, we want to share some vital information with you.
Please take a moment to read the helpee guidelines. This will make sure that your post follows the helpee rules of our community.
Please don't ping <@&775784618955505685>, <@&1283689826742440016>, <@&819616364188139550>, or <@&624327278137966593> for help because their job is to take care of the server's administrative tasks, not to answer queries directly. However, if you have a problem with how a Helper is acting, you can ping a Helper Moderator.
It's always very useful if you can show us the work you've done so far. This makes it easier for our Helpers to find mistakes and help you get to the right answer.
what'd you try?
also wdym by L2 inner product? I've only L2 followed by norm or metric
$\int_0^1 f\cdot g$
$\langle f\vert g\rangle =\int_0^1\overline{f}g?$
Yes
Great
We are in an R vectorspace tho
did you try some U?
Tony
Ofc f is continuous
On [0;1]
It‘s closed (I checked). My idea is to show it‘s orthogonal complement is {0} and then take it‘s complement to get X which isn‘t equal to U obviously
I don‘t know how to show it‘s complement is {0}
Hmm
I could try proof by contradiction, no?
And then make use of the continuity of f maybe?
Lemme do it rq
Did you figure it out ?
Yess
I showed that U is equal to the span of the indicator functions [0;1/2]
Thats pretty easy to show
Oh wait
I noticed a mistake in my proof
Yeah well this isn’t a continuous function
It’s not L^2[0,1] but C([0,1])
And I’m guessing you meant U^perp
Uhh I fixed it
I think
Well
I showed U=span{indicatorfunction}^perp
Then perp both sides to get U^perp=span{indicator function}
But the indicator function isn’t continuous
Except 0
it’s not in X
Yes, U^perp is {0}
So the solution is correct, no?
i don’t understand your proof, like I said the indicator function isn’t continuous it’s not an element of your prehilbert space
you can’t use it here
You can prove this differently
Uhh isn‘t C in L^2?
I mean Not literally
But like
And then argue that since U perp only consists of continuous functions, the only valid element in the span would 0
Since 0 is both in the span and continuous
Sooo, what do you think? Is it correct or are there any mistakes?
Oh shi
I see what you mean
Uhh
Actually, this argument does work but it assumes that you know stuff on L^2[0,1], ie that C[0,1] is dense it it for instance and that it’s indeed a Hilbert space
Yes, I proved it before
Sure, I‘d love to see it
if g is orthogonal to U, then you can first show that g(x)=0 for any x in [1/2,1], by seeing that int_1/2^1 f(x) g(x) dx=0 for any continuous function f which is supported in [1/2,1]
Proof by contradiction?
And then use the continuity to find a neighborhood where it‘s non zero?
well generally if $\mathcal{C}([a,b])$ has the $L^2$ inner product then ${f: f(a)=0}^{\perp}={0}$ and yeah you can show this by contradiction
Rotator
I see I see
So here you’ll have notably $g_{|[\frac{1}{2}1]} \in {f \in \mathcal{C}([\frac{1}{2},1]:f(\frac{1}{2})=0}^{\perp}$
Rotator
got a bit mixed up but yeah
I suppose you mean f(x)=0?
Because if f is continuous on [1/2,1] with f(1/2)=0 then you can extend it to [0,1] by simply setting f(x)=0 for x<1/2
and such an extension is supported in [1/2,1] by definition
Ohh I see
@visual echo
Hello tony.241, this is a friendly reminder that your help request has been inactive for more than 24 hours. If you no longer need assistance, please consider closing the thread using the +close command. This thread will be automatically closed in 3 days if it remains inactive.