#Thoughts on Wikipedia as a source/place for information?

21 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

broken vault
#

Can be math related, political, whatever is interesting for you

main glacier
#

Good source of information to get an overview on any topic

eager valve
#

i put 100% faith into wikipedia and so it will be an international emergency if there is any untruth anywhere on the website

fallow sandal
#

Get your info from a credible source

#

Anybody can put anything on wikipedia

gloomy sedge
fallow sandal
#

MIT OpenCourseWare is good for free math content (and countless other subjects besides math) (although you'll typically need some kind of textbook),

OpenStax (initiative of Rice University, their books written by college professors and some high school math teachers),

Any kind of textbook or book in general written by a professor, like Calculus by James Stewart (super well known textbook, one of the best), or Introduction to Linear Algebra sixth edition by Professor Gilbert Strang (also widely known and used)

#

That's kinda a summary of who/what you wanna be looking for

broken vault
#

It's not bad, but definitely hit or miss depending on topic

fallow sandal
#

Agreed

broken vault
#

Safe to say, I wouldn't use it as a primary source, probably just a secondary sourcing for a primary source like a book

stable quartz
#

good

stable quartz
#

everyone says wikipedia is bad but then they see wiki fandom and uh... yeah...

grave harbor
#

Well, assuming you have an eye for spotting trivial errors or enough mathematical maturity to not misunderstand things when it isn't explained like you are five

broken vault
dusky latch
#

They keep reverting my edits.

primal flower
#

maybe Stack Exchange or MO would be a liable source?

broken vault