#Thoughts on Wikipedia as a source/place for information?
21 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Good source of information to get an overview on any topic
i put 100% faith into wikipedia and so it will be an international emergency if there is any untruth anywhere on the website
Name some credible source
MIT OpenCourseWare is good for free math content (and countless other subjects besides math) (although you'll typically need some kind of textbook),
OpenStax (initiative of Rice University, their books written by college professors and some high school math teachers),
Any kind of textbook or book in general written by a professor, like Calculus by James Stewart (super well known textbook, one of the best), or Introduction to Linear Algebra sixth edition by Professor Gilbert Strang (also widely known and used)
That's kinda a summary of who/what you wanna be looking for
I've used MIT OCW for things like introductions to complex analysis and signal analysis before reading more in depth about them
It's not bad, but definitely hit or miss depending on topic
Agreed
Safe to say, I wouldn't use it as a primary source, probably just a secondary sourcing for a primary source like a book
good
everyone says wikipedia is bad but then they see wiki fandom and uh... yeah...
sufficient for anything stem related.
Well, assuming you have an eye for spotting trivial errors or enough mathematical maturity to not misunderstand things when it isn't explained like you are five
Hey! I haven’t seen you around… did you change your username or something? I checked I guess you haven’t been so active when I got mod.
I keep trying to edit the page for Coneheads to imply that it was based on Mark Andreessen's weird fucking head.
They keep reverting my edits.
maybe Stack Exchange or MO would be a liable source?
Tragic