#proof about subspace

79 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

grave monolith
nimble ermineBOT
#
  1. Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
  2. Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
  3. Do not ping other members randomly for help.
  4. Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
  5. Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
  6. If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:

+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:

grave monolith
#

Here's my proof for (a)(->): Since W is a subspace of V, W is a vector space with the operations defined on V. Therefore, 0 is in W by VS 3.

#

the proof in text is longer so I'm wondering if it's valid

hoary basin
#

What you're actually saying would be a proof that W being a subspace would imply condition a.

grave monolith
hoary basin
grave monolith
#

ok if it’s backward then is the proof valid?

austere snow
#

@grave monolith What's your definition of vector subspace?

#

I'm under the impression that people just learn what you showed in the theorem as a definition

austere snow
austere snow
#

like, say the 0 of V is denoted 0_V

#

And the 0 of W is denoted 0_W

#

there is essentially no reason why they should be the same thing at this stage yet

#

The point (a) argues that 0_V is in W, which you have yet to prove

#

You know that 0_W is in W, but not that 0_V is in W

#

(it should be noted that for a vector space V, the 0_V given by VS 3 is provably unique, which has important consequences)

grave monolith
#

How do I know it’s who’s 0 in (a)?

austere snow
#

in a vector space

grave monolith
austere snow
#

So this makes things a whole lot easier

#

you just have to verify that 0_V is a neutral element of W, as in, it is a good candidate to be a 0_W

#

by uniqueness, it is the 0_W

grave monolith
#

I’m not sure what neutral element means, does that imply I have to show 0_v + x=x for all x in W?

grave monolith
#

In general, do we need to say that what 0 being mentioned?

austere snow
#

But you don't yet know whether or not 0_W = 0_V

#

But you can prove that 0_V is also in W and verifies the same properties

#

And by uniqueness, 0_V = 0_W

austere snow
austere snow
grave monolith
austere snow
austere snow
#

What is w + (-1)w?

grave monolith
austere snow
#

You know:

  • 0_V is in V
  • 0_W is in W
  • 0_V verifies 0_V + x = x + 0_V = x for all x in W

You don't know, but must prove one of the two following:

  • 0_V is in W
  • 0_V = 0_W
#

(Note that here, if you can prove one of the two, the other one follows automatically)

grave monolith
#

If I prove the zero element for w is unique, then 0_V = 0_W?

austere snow
#

But if 0_V is in W, it is a fortiori a zero element in W, therefore it is the zero element of W

#

conversely, if 0_V = 0_W, it is obvious that 0_V is in W

#

so you have to prove that one of the two holds, at least

grave monolith
#

But 0_V and 0_W are both zero element for W, and also zero is unique, what am I missing?

austere snow
#

so it is a nonzero element of V that acts like a zero only on W

#

Such a situation cannot happen, indeed, but it has not yet been proven why

hoary basin
#

To be clear, you have not yet proved why. Lest you believe there are unproven mathematical statements which are accepted as fact.

grave monolith
hoary basin
austere snow
hoary basin
#

Hypothetically, unless you can prove we can't.

austere snow
#

nothing says that the red dot should be exactly the black dot

#

(It is true that a situation where 0_W is different from 0_V cannot happen, but you must show why)

grave monolith
#

When I prove uniqueness of zero, I used theorem 1.1, which assumes the vectors are from the same vector space

grave monolith
austere snow
#

But on the other hand, w is also a vector in V since W is a subset of V

#

So?

grave monolith
#

also equals to 0_V

austere snow
grave monolith
#

0_V = 0_W so 0_V is in W

austere snow
grave monolith
#

Thx a lot

grave monolith
#

+close

royal sealBOT
# grave monolith +close
Please thank your Helpers before closing!

Please thank the helpers who assisted you by clicking the buttons below. You can thank each helper only once. Once you're done, click "Close Post" to close this thread.

royal sealBOT
# royal seal

Thank you for your feedback! Save humanity by destroying it has been awarded 1 helper_points. They now have 103 helper_points. They have 3 helper_points daily left for today.

royal sealBOT
# royal seal

Thank you for your feedback! Techie Literate has been awarded 1 helper_points. They now have 1053 helper_points. They have 3 helper_points daily left for today.