#Continuity and differentiability
111 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
Why is the floor function discontinuous at integers?
What is the definition of continuity?
for example let's take [x]
now let's take an integer k
if x approaches k from left.. it will be a value less than k. so the GIF function will give (k-1)
and if it approaches k from right.. it will be greater than k.. then it GIF function would return k
with the same logic.. all gif functions are discontinuous at integers.. because LHL not equal to RHL
What is the definition of continuity?
lhl not equal to rhl
lhl equal to rhl but the function isn't defined at that point
there are many ways of defining continuity
but I think the best way to visualize it is like if we trace the graph of a function at a point like that we'd need to uh
A function f is continuous at a point a if and only if $\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = f(a)$.
Techie Literate
LHL = RHL = function at that point
yeah sorry I thought you meant discontinuity. my bad
Discontinuity is literally just the absence of continuity.
yeah
A function f is discontinuous at a point a if and only if $\lim_{x \to a} f(x) \neq f(a)$.
Techie Literate
okay
could you tell me why I should not consider the point 0 in this case? is 0 not an integer?
...because it's the endpoint of the domain.
The left-sided limit doesn't exist because there's no domain of the function to the left.
The function is undefined there.
yeah so if the limit (LHL) doesn't exist can't we say it's discontinuous
By that logic f(x) = x^2 on [2, 4] is discontinuous at 2 and 4.
mhm you do make sense
the thing is
I encountered a question literally before this one
have a look
okay wait a minute before I come to that. if it's incorrect to consider 0. why are we considering 4? RHL at 4 doesn't exist too cuz it's outside the domain
When we have an endpoint of the domain, we take the limit on the side where the domain exists.
ah
And $\lim_{x \to 4^-} f(x) \neq f(4)$.
Techie Literate
this one isn't really clear to me. I mean.. why don't we?
...what?
why do we do this
what's the logic
this is the "previous problem" I was talking about. see.. in this one they considered 0..
Because "continuity" isn't some arbitrary thing we made up for no reason. We use it to talk about and think about the behavior of functions. "This function ends at the endpoint of its domain" is a trivial observation that doesn't have anything to do with the behavior we're talking about when we talk about continuity.
the left hand side of 0 also lies outside the domain of this function eifht here
What's sgn(0)?
0
And what's $\lim_{x \to 0^+} sgn(x)$?
Techie Literate
I know sgn is discontinuous at 0 because because RHL would give 1 and LHL would give -1
No.
Sgn is discontinuous at 0 because sgn(0) = 0 and the limit as x approaches 0 of sgn(x) is not 0.
yeah literally RHL not equal to LHL. that's enough to say it's discontinuous which I already said here. but yes since value of function AT 0 is neither LHL nor RHL its neither left cont nor right cont
No.
RHL not equal to LHL is only relevant ever because it means the limit doesn't exist, therefore it's not equal to anything, therefore it's not equal to the function at the point.
okay fine
Again, this is the definition of continuity.
You're going to have a bad time in math if you struggle to think about definitions.
could you please explain why we considered 0 in this question ... 0 is outside the domain the lhl part
right. will be careful from now on
No it's not. The statement "0 is outside the domain the lhl part" is literally meaningless.
the left hand side of 0 doesn't lie inside the domain
could you please explain why we considered 0 in this example and not the one I sent before (the original questn)
I already did.
The fact that the domain does not extend to the left of the point under consideration is not relevant.
And I explained why.
And I explained why we decided to do it that way.
so why did we consider the point 0 in the sgn problem. the left of the point 0 is outside the domain of the given problem. it isn't supposed to be relevant
domain of the function doesn't extend to the left of 0 for both the problems. why are we considering it for one and not for the other
We consider the point in both cases.
so what's the answer to the sgn(sinx) problem?
and what's the answer to the sgn(quadratic) + [x+3] problem?
The answers are correct.
And I have already said why.
You haven't been listening.
this one is 5 (according to book)
the book considered 0. said function is discontinuous at x = 0
and in this one the book says 4. there was no mention of the point 0
you said we considered 0 for both the cases. but if we did.. then like sgn(sinx) is discontinuous for 0. it's left hand limit DOES not exist because it lies outside the domain. the function is not defined at those points.
similarly for the second problem.. the left hand part lies OUTSIDE the provided domain.
No. Wrong.
And I've already said why it's wrong.
And you didn't listen.
we considered 0 for sgn(sinx) and said it's discontinuous there. right?
Stopp.
alright
Stop repeating the question I've already answered
Especially since you didn't listen to the answer the first time.
Answering it again is just a bigger waste of my time.
thus one?
Yes.
so?
same case for both questions
No it's not.
how
And I've already explained why.
I will consider repeating myself if you apologize for not listening.
this?
...close?
okay what does this even mean?
What does it look like it means?
I don't get it. could you please explain for both the cases
I've said the conditions under which I will consider repeating myself.
I will consider repeating myself if you apologize for not listening.
@knotty abyss
if c is an end point only RHL for left endpoint and LHL for right end point is supposed to be checked for continuity, yes?
and now for the f(x) = sgn(sinx) problem... at 0 (0 is a left endpoint)... the right hand limit
didn't match the value of the function at that point so its discontinuous
and for the sgn(quadratic) + [x-3]
that [x-3] part
the right hand limit of the function perfectly matches the value of the function at 0 (left endpoint so right endpoint is being checked)
this is why it's continuous at 0
I will consider repeating myself if you apologize for not listening.
could you kindly confirm if this conclusion is correct or not?
I will consider repeating myself if you apologize for not listening.
you don't need to repeat everything from scratch.
I thought about this myself.. and if this is wrong please say it. I'll go through it again
Why should I say anything to someone who doesn't listen?
+close
Please thank the helpers who assisted you by clicking the buttons below. You can thank each helper only once. Once you're done, click "Close Post" to close this thread.